2025-11-052025/26:NU7 · p.4NUBusiness & energy
Ban on mining in alum shale
What's at stake: The decision affects local communities and natural areas near alum shale deposits, which risk leakage of sulfuric acid, heavy metals and radioactive substances as well as loss of farmland and biodiversity, and also affects Sweden's and the EU's access to uranium and other critical metals and minerals needed for, among other things, the green transition.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether a general, nationwide ban on mining in alum shale should be introduced because of its particular environmental risks, or whether the existing protections in the Environmental Code and the Minerals Act are sufficient to allow such mining under controlled conditions.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee notes that alum shale contains several innovation-critical metals and minerals, including uranium. With reference to the high environmental and safety requirements that will continue to apply, the existing aptitude requirement introduced into the Minerals Act in 2022, and the strong public interest that may exist in alum shale mining together with the precautionary measures already built into the legislation, the committee agrees with the government that a general ban on mining in alum shale is not warranted. The motions are rejected.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 5 (V, MP)
The reservation (V, MP) calls for the government to come back to the Riksdag with a proposal to introduce a national ban on mining in alum shale in the Minerals Act. Only small amounts of uranium can be extracted from alum shale while the mining generates large amounts of waste, and alum shale also contains many heavy metals and other toxic substances, making large-scale extraction more environmentally risky than traditional ore extraction. The mining takes place in open pits that require large areas of land, often in areas with fertile farmland, cultural values and biodiversity, and safe techniques do not currently exist that can guarantee that sulfuric acid, heavy metals and radioactive substances do not leak out and damage the environment and human health. The reservation therefore holds that extraction from alum shale carries unacceptable risks and should be banned.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 5 by V, MP.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
What each plan points to — and how the party voted
For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| Plan | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | No 0/19/0/3 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| S | No | Yes 86/1/4/15 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | derived |
| MP | No | No 0/15/0/3 | follows the plan | confidence: high | derived |
| C | Yes | Yes 18/0/1/5 | follows the plan | confidence: low | derived |
| L | Yes | Yes 14/0/0/2 | follows the plan | confidence: low | derived |
| KD | No | Yes 16/0/0/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | derived |
| M | Yes | Yes 58/0/0/10 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| SD | Yes | Yes 61/0/0/11 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
Broke with the party line
| SAnnika Strandhäll (S, Stockholms kommun) | Abstain — party line: Yes |
| SKadir Kasirga (S, Stockholms kommun) | Abstain — party line: Yes |
| SMatilda Ernkrans (S, Örebro län) | Abstain — party line: Yes |
| SMikael Dahlqvist (S, Värmlands län) | No — party line: Yes |
| SSerkan Köse (S, Stockholms län) | Abstain — party line: Yes |
| CFredrik Lindstål (C, Stockholms kommun) | Abstain — party line: Yes |
MPs whose vote differs from their party's majority position in this division. Marked with a dark ring in the chamber view.
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2025/26:56 by Birger Lahti et al. (V) proposition 2 and 2025/26:208 by Katarina Luhr et al. (MP) proposition 2.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2025/26:56 av Birger Lahti m.fl. (V) yrkande 2 och 2025/26:208 av Katarina Luhr m.fl. (MP) yrkande 2.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag approved the government's proposal on uranium mining in Sweden. The decision means that uranium mining will be permitted in Sweden and that uranium is classified as a concession mineral, meaning a mineral that is particularly important for society. The decision also means that activities that handle small amounts of uranium will not be subject to licensing requirements and will not be covered by municipal veto. Municipal veto means that municipalities through a local political decision can determine whether the activity should be permitted or not in the municipality. The legislative changes enter into force on 1 January 2026.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to introduce a national ban on alum shale mining. (V, MP) — Reservation 5
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan demands ambitious environmental goals followed up with sharp legislation and that mining be driven with a long-term holistic perspective that weighs local natural values.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan demands ambitious environmental goals followed up with sharp legislation and that mining be driven with a long-term holistic perspective that weighs local natural values. Mining in alum shale means, according to the counter-proposal, large waste quantities, heavy metals, and risk of leakage, and takes arable farmland, which clashes with the state's responsibility for food self-sufficiency. That uranium would primarily go to nuclear power, which the plan rejects, strengthens the conclusion.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver ambitiösa miljömål som följs upp med skarp lagstiftning och att gruvbrytningen drivs med ett långsiktigt helhetsperspektiv som väger in lokala naturvärden. Brytning i alunskiffer innebär enligt motförslaget stora avfallsmängder, tungmetaller och risk för läckage, och tar bördig jordbruksmark i anspråk, vilket krockar med statens ansvar för livsmedelsförsörjningen. Att uranet dessutom huvudsakligen skulle gå till kärnkraft, som planen avvisar, förstärker slutsatsen.
- ambitious environmental goalsdecisive»Vi vill se ambitiösa miljömål som följs upp med skarp lagstiftning och praktiskt arbete.« (party programme ↗)“We want to see ambitious environmental goals followed up with sharp legislation and practical work.”
- holistic view of mining»Den behöver drivas med ett långsiktigt helhetsperspektiv som ser till såväl de globala behoven som lokala naturvärden och den ekonomiska utvecklingen i närområdet.« (party programme ↗)“It needs to be driven with a long-term holistic perspective that considers both global needs and local natural values and the economic development in the surrounding area.”
- protection of farmland»Staten har ett särskilt ansvar att se till att landet är tillräckligt självförsörjande med livsmedel.« (party programme ↗)“The state has a special responsibility to ensure that the country is sufficiently self-sufficient in food.”
- no to nuclear power expansion»Vänsterpartiet avvisar planerna på att bygga ut kärnkraften som en väg ut ur fossilberoendet.« (party programme ↗)“The Left Party rejects plans to expand nuclear power as a way out of fossil dependence.”
The plan requires a poison-free environment with clean air and clean water throughout Sweden, protection of biological diversity and that the extraction of natural resources should be sustainable, and a viable food production.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires a poison-free environment with clean air and clean water throughout Sweden, protection of biological diversity and that the extraction of natural resources should be sustainable, and a viable food production. Large-scale open-pit mining in alum shale with heavy metals and radioactive waste products on fertile agricultural land stands in conflict with these commitments. However, a general ban is a far-reaching measure the plan does not express, which is why the uncertainty is great.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver en giftfri miljö med ren luft och rent vatten i hela Sverige, värn av biologisk mångfald och att utvinning av naturresurser ska vara hållbar, samt en livskraftig livsmedelsproduktion. Storskalig dagbrottsbrytning i alunskiffer med tungmetaller och radioaktiva restprodukter på bördig jordbruksmark står i konflikt med dessa åtaganden. Ett generellt förbud är dock ett långtgående medel planen inte uttalar, varför osäkerheten är stor.
- poison-free environmentdecisive»Giftfri miljö med ren luft och rent vatten i hela Sverige.« (party programme ↗)“Poison-free environment with clean air and clean water throughout Sweden.”
- protection of natural values»Värn av biologisk mångfald och Sveriges värdefulla natur och vattenmiljöer.« (party programme ↗)“Protection of biological diversity and Sweden's valuable nature and water environments.”
- protection of agricultural land»Livskraftig svensk livsmedelsproduktion som stärker landets självförsörjningsförmåga.« (party programme ↗)“Viable Swedish food production that strengthens the country's self-sufficiency capacity.”
- sustainable natural resource extraction»Hållbar utvinning och användning av naturresurser, med ekonomisk kompensation till« (party programme ↗)“Sustainable extraction and use of natural resources, with economic compensation to”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan establishes that uranium mining shall be prohibited and describes uranium extraction as environmentally destructive with dangerous waste without sustainable solution.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that uranium mining shall be prohibited and describes uranium extraction as environmentally destructive with dangerous waste without sustainable solution. It also requires that the precautionary principle be applied to greater extent and that legislation against spread of pollution is sharpened. A national ban against mining in oil shale, where most uranium deposits are found, follows from these commitments even though oil shale is not specifically mentioned.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att uranbrytning ska vara förbjuden och beskriver uranutvinning som miljöförstörande med farligt avfall utan hållbar lösning. Den kräver dessutom att försiktighetsprincipen tillämpas i högre utsträckning och att lagstiftningen mot spridning av föroreningar skärps. Ett nationellt förbud mot brytning i alunskiffer, där merparten av uranfyndigheterna finns, följer av dessa åtaganden även om alunskiffer inte nämns särskilt.
- förbjuden uranbrytningdecisive»inga nya tillstånd för torvbrytning ska ges och uranbrytning ska vara« (party programme ↗)“no new permits for peat mining should be given and uranium mining shall be”
- försiktighetsprincipen»försiktighetsprincipen tillämpas i högre utsträckning« (party programme ↗)“the precautionary principle be applied to greater extent”
- uranbrytning skapar farligt avfall»miljöförstörande brytning av uran, som är en ändlig resurs som skapar farligt avfall utan« (party programme ↗)“environmentally destructive mining of uranium, which is a finite resource that creates dangerous waste without”
- skärpt föroreningslagstiftning»Lagstiftningen mot spridning av föroreningar i miljön måste skärpas.« (party programme ↗)“Legislation against spread of pollution in the environment must be sharpened.”
The plan states that Sweden would rather itself extract the minerals and metals the green transition requires than import them from countries with greater carbon footprint.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan states that Sweden would rather itself extract the minerals and metals the green transition requires than import them from countries with greater carbon footprint. A general national ban on mining in alum shale would shut out several innovation-critical metals, and the plan's environmental protection is based on assessment and that it should be unprofitable to act in an environmentally destructive way rather than on general mining bans. The risks to a poison-free environment and agricultural land work against, which is why certainty is low.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att Sverige hellre själv ska utvinna de mineral och metaller den gröna omställningen kräver än importera dem från länder med större klimatavtryck. Ett generellt nationellt förbud mot brytning i alunskiffer skulle stänga ute flera innovationskritiska metaller, och planens miljöskydd bygger på prövning och att det ska vara olönsamt att agera miljöförstörande snarare än på generella brytningsförbud. Riskerna för giftfri miljö och åkermark väger emot, varför säkerheten är låg.
- domestic mineral extractiondecisive»Det är bättre att Sverige tar ansvar och utvinner mer mineral och metaller istället för att fortsätta importera dem från länder med större klimatavtryck och sämre arbetsvillkor.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It is better that Sweden takes responsibility and extracts more minerals and metals instead of continuing to import them from countries with greater carbon footprint and worse working conditions.”
- economic incentives over bans»Det ska alltid vara lönsamt att vara miljövårdande och olönsamt att agera miljöförstörande.« (party programme ↗)“It shall always be profitable to be environmentally responsible and unprofitable to act in an environmentally destructive way.”
- poison-free environment as right»Tillgång till rent vatten, ren luft och giftfri miljö är en fundamental rätt för alla människor« (party programme ↗)“Access to clean water, clean air and a poison-free environment is a fundamental right for all people”
- protection of agricultural land»Åkermarken är en begränsad tillgång som måste skyddas bättre.« (party programme ↗)“Agricultural land is a limited resource that must be protected better.”
The plan meets environmental risks in extraction with clear environmental and safety requirements and state neutrality between energy types that meet these requirements, not with general mining bans.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan meets environmental risks in extraction with clear environmental and safety requirements and state neutrality between energy types that meet these requirements, not with general mining bans. It also wants to expand nuclear power and take advantage of mineral resources. The counter-proposal's demand for a national ban on mining in alum shale thus goes against the plan, although the plan's protection of arable farmland pulls in the opposite direction.
Original (Swedish)
Planen möter miljörisker i utvinning med tydliga miljö- och säkerhetskrav och statlig neutralitet mellan energislag som uppfyller dessa krav, inte med generella brytningsförbud. Den vill dessutom bygga ut kärnkraften och ta till vara mineraltillgångar. Motförslagets krav på ett nationellt förbud mot brytning i alunskiffer går därför emot planen, även om planens skydd av bördig jordbruksmark drar åt motsatt håll.
- clear environmental and safety requirementsdecisive»För alla energislag ska finnas tydliga miljö- och säkerhetskrav.« (party programme ↗)“For all energy types there shall be clear environmental and safety requirements.”
- technology neutrality between energy types»vara neutral mellan energislag som uppfyller miljö- och säkerhetskraven.« (party programme ↗)“be neutral between energy types that meet environmental and safety requirements.”
- expanded nuclear power»I stället vill vi möjliggöra fler nya reaktorer på fler ställen« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Instead we want to enable more new reactors in more places”
- protection of farmland»Bevarandet av bördig jordbruksmark är viktig för matförsörjningen av den växande« (party programme ↗)“Preservation of arable farmland is important for the food supply of the growing”
The party programme requires extra caution when there is suspicion of threat or irreversible damage to the environment and explicitly names legislation with prohibitions as a strategic instrument.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme requires extra caution when there is suspicion of threat or irreversible damage to the environment and explicitly names legislation with prohibitions as a strategic instrument. Large-scale open-pit mining of alum shale on agricultural land, with risk of leakage of heavy metals and radioactive substances to groundwater, is such a situation. The plan also values agricultural land for food production. That the Christian Democrats at the same time want to use natural resources makes the conclusion uncertain.
Original (Swedish)
Principprogrammet kräver extra försiktighet när det finns misstanke om hot eller oåterkallelig skada på miljön och anger uttryckligen lagstiftning med förbud som ett strategiskt instrument. Storskalig dagbrottsbrytning i alunskiffer på jordbruksmark, med risk för läckage av tungmetaller och radioaktiva ämnen till grundvattnet, är en sådan situation. Planen värnar också åkermarken för livsmedelsproduktion. Att KD samtidigt vill bruka naturresurser gör slutsatsen osäker.
- caution at irreversible damagedecisive»Med detta menas att om misstanke finns om hot eller oåterkallelig skada på miljön, måste extra försiktighet tillämpas.« (party programme ↗)“This means that if suspicion exists of threat or irreversible damage to the environment, extra caution must be applied.”
- agricultural land shall be protected»det långsiktigt nödvändigt att åkermarken i Sverige och övriga Europa kan nyttjas för livsmedelsproduk- tion« (party programme ↗)“it is long-term necessary for agricultural land in Sweden and the rest of Europe to be used for food production”
- prohibition as environmental instrument»Lagstiftning med förbud och gränsvärden, en ekologiskt färgad skattepolitik, miljöledningssystem och miljövänlig upphandling är exempel på strategiska instrument som ska användas.« (party programme ↗)“Legislation with prohibitions and limits, an ecologically coloured tax policy, environmental management systems and environmentally sound procurement are examples of strategic instruments that shall be used.”
- clean water as a threatened resource»tillgång till betes- och jordbruksmark, till rent vatten och ren luft samt fiskemöjligheter som är hotad.« (party programme ↗)“access to grazing and agricultural land, to clean water and clean air and fishing opportunities which is threatened.”
flags: citat_migrerat
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan states that Sweden's rich mineral resources should be able to be extracted responsibly and sustainably in the long term and that environmental considerations should be combined with technological development and growth rather than general bans.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan states that Sweden's rich mineral resources should be able to be extracted responsibly and sustainably in the long term and that environmental considerations should be combined with technological development and growth rather than general bans. A national ban on mining in alum shale would close most of the country's deposits of innovation-critical metals. The plan therefore speaks against the counter-proposal's demand.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att Sveriges rika mineraltillgångar ska kunna utvinnas ansvarsfullt och långsiktigt hållbart och att miljöhänsyn ska förenas med teknisk utveckling och tillväxt snarare än med generella förbud. Ett nationellt förbud mot brytning i alunskiffer skulle stänga merparten av landets fyndigheter av innovationskritiska metaller. Planen talar därför emot motförslagets krav.
- responsible mineral extractiondecisive»Våra rika mineraltillgångar ska kunna utvinnas ansvarsfullt och långsiktigt hållbart.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Our rich mineral resources should be able to be extracted responsibly and sustainably in the long term.”
- technology before bans(2022 manifesto)
- natural resources as source of prosperity»Sveriges välstånd har i hög grad byggt på våra rika naturtillgångar« (party programme ↗)“Sweden's prosperity has been built to a large extent on our rich natural resources”
- faster environmental review»Minska antalet regler för jordbruket och korta handläggningstider för miljötillstånd« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Reduce the number of regulations for agriculture and shorten processing times for environmental permits”
flags: citat_ej_verifierat
The plan opposes mines not being allowed to start and demands that it become easier and faster to open mines and that mineral values in the ground be utilized.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan opposes mines not being allowed to start and demands that it become easier and faster to open mines and that mineral values in the ground be utilized. A national ban on mining alum shale is such a general obstacle that the plan wants to avoid, and the assessment should instead take place in the permit process. The precautionary principle in the party programme remains as a balance but does not justify a total ban.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vänder sig mot att gruvor inte får startas och kräver att det blir enklare och snabbare att öppna gruvor samt att mineralvärdena i marken tas till vara. Ett nationellt förbud mot brytning i alunskiffer är ett sådant generellt hinder som planen vill undvika, och prövningen ska i stället ske i tillståndsprocessen. Försiktighetsprincipen i partiprogrammet kvarstår som en avvägning men motiverar inte ett totalförbud.
- enklare gruvdriftdecisive»Det behöver också bli enklare och gå snabbare att öppna gruvor för de mineraler som behövs för exempelvis tillverkning av batterier.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It also needs to become easier and faster to open mines for the minerals needed for, for example, battery manufacturing.”
- ta tillvara mineralvärden»Värdet på mineraler i marken, på skogar och potentialen för rekreation och turism är enorm på landsbygden.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The value of minerals in the ground, in forests and the potential for recreation and tourism is enormous in the countryside.”
- effektiva tillståndsprocesser»Effektivisera och öka förutsägbarheten i tillståndsprocesserna för gruvnäring, elnätsutbyggnad och industri« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Streamline and increase predictability in permit processes for mining, power grid expansion and industry”
- försiktighetsprincipen»Försiktighetsprincipen är således central inom Sverigedemokraternas miljöpolitik« (party programme ↗)“The precautionary principle is thus central to Sweden Democrats' environmental policy”
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2025/26:NU7)
- Committee report full text (HD01NU7)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2025/26:208 — med anledning av prop. 2024/25:203 Förbudet mot utvinning av uran tas bort av Katarina Luhr m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2025/26:216 — med anledning av prop. 2024/25:203 Förbudet mot utvinning av uran tas bort av Fredrik Olovsson m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:272 — med anledning av prop. 2024/25:203 Förbudet mot utvinning av uran tas bort av Elisabeth Thand Ringqvist (C)
- Motion 2025/26:56 — med anledning av prop. 2024/25:203 Förbudet mot utvinning av uran tas bort av Birger Lahti m.fl. (V)
- Proposition 2024/25:203 — Förbudet mot utvinning av uran tas bort
Source: The Swedish Parliament