Every vote where the AI's document-faithful vote differs from the real one — sorted, searchable, with sources and embeddable graphics.
ResearcherMethods, data and reproducibilityFull methodology, contamination defence, open prompts, raw data and code.
CuriousSearch a topic you care aboutFind the vote, see how your party voted — and what its own plan pointed to.
Evidence
Every claim can be followed in both directions
The quotes are not decoration — they are an index that reads both ways. 77,522 citations tie 4,715 lines of 23 party documents to 2,536 divisions.
Every AI decision has to quote the party’s own documents verbatim. The quote links to that exact line, highlighted where it stands.
Open a vote →From the document to the votesOpen a party document and every cited line carries a margin note: which divisions leaned on it, and whether the party then voted with its own plan or against it.
Open a party document →By party
How often did parties vote against their own plan?
Share of the party’s explicit commitments — where the plan took a position on that very question — that it voted against anyway.
The same thing, but across every decision the agent could read a position from the plan for, including where the plan only touches the question in principle. More decisions per party, weaker evidence per row.
Explore
Navigate by time
Each cell is a month: number of votes, colored by AI ↔ actual agreement (green = follows the plan). Click for that month's cases.