2026-03-192025/26:TU10 · p.7TUTransport & infrastructure

Shipping's environmental and climate impact

What's at stake: Shipping's climate impact is significant and expected to grow with demand for freight transport, while shipping lags behind road transport in the shift to fossil-free fuels. The outcome affects how quickly shipowners get economic incentives to invest in emission-reducing technology and how well shipping's overall impact on the marine environment is mapped.

Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.

What the vote decides

The question is whether the government should be tasked with setting a national target for fossil-free fuels in shipping and establishing state investment support and a dedicated climate initiative for shipping, or whether the ongoing investments in electrification, sustainable fuels and EU regulation are sufficient to drive the transition forward.

Yes Yes — the committee proposal

The committee welcomes the government's investments in electrification, sustainable fuels and green shipping corridors, as well as the EU's binding rules on reducing climate impact, and notes that shipping's environmental rules are mainly set at the international level. The committee supports the government's work on action programs and national initiatives, and recommends rejecting the motions calling for a dedicated national target, investment support, and a climate initiative for shipping.

No No — the reservations

Reservation 16 (V, MP)

The reservation (V and MP) holds that shipping, which today is heavily dependent on untaxed fossil fuels, lacks a clear national direction for the transition, and wants the government to set a national target for fossil-free fuels and investigate state investment support and a climate initiative for shipping. The reservation also wants Trafikanalys tasked with following up shipping's overall impact on the marine environment, which currently lacks systematic monitoring.

Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.

VSMPCLKDMSD
YesNoAbstainAbsent

What do the votes mean here?

Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).

No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 16 by V, MP.

Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.

What each plan points to — and how the party voted

For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.

PlanVoteConfidenceEvidence
Vown reservationNoNo 0/17/0/5follows the planconfidence: highderived
SNoAbstain 0/0/93/13departs from the planconfidence: highderived
MPown reservationNoNo 0/13/0/5follows the planconfidence: highexplicit
CNoAbstain 0/0/21/3departs from the planconfidence: highderived
LYesYes 12/0/0/4follows the planconfidence: lowderived
KDNoYes 14/0/0/5departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
MYesYes 60/0/0/8follows the planconfidence: mediumderived
SDYesYes 61/0/0/10follows the planconfidence: mediumderived

Committee proposal

The Riksdag rejects the motions 2025/26:865 by Magnus Manhammar (S), 2025/26:1626 by Magnus Manhammar and Eva Lindh (both S), 2025/26:1922 by Magnus Manhammar and Heléne Björklund (both S), 2025/26:2780 by Nooshi Dadgostar et al. (V) motions 46 and 53-59, 2025/26:2789 by Nooshi Dadgostar et al. (V) motion 18, 2025/26:2825 by Stina Larsson et al. (C) motion 9, 2025/26:2849 by Markus Wiechel (SD) motion 10, 2025/26:3582 by Rickard Nordin et al. (C) motions 77 and 78, 2025/26:3653 by Aylin Nouri et al. (S) motions 28 and 87, 2025/26:3728 by Ulrika Heie et al. (C) motions 78, 80 and 95, 2025/26:3732 by Åsa Westlund et al. (S) motion 40 and 2025/26:3774 by Emma Nohrén et al. (MP) motion 40.

Original (Swedish)

Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2025/26:865 av Magnus Manhammar (S), 2025/26:1626 av Magnus Manhammar och Eva Lindh (båda S), 2025/26:1922 av Magnus Manhammar och Heléne Björklund (båda S), 2025/26:2780 av Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V) yrkandena 46 och 53-59, 2025/26:2789 av Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V) yrkande 18, 2025/26:2825 av Stina Larsson m.fl. (C) yrkande 9, 2025/26:2849 av Markus Wiechel (SD) yrkande 10, 2025/26:3582 av Rickard Nordin m.fl. (C) yrkandena 77 och 78, 2025/26:3653 av Aylin Nouri m.fl. (S) yrkandena 28 och 87, 2025/26:3728 av Ulrika Heie m.fl. (C) yrkandena 78, 80 och 95, 2025/26:3732 av Åsa Westlund m.fl. (S) yrkande 40 och 2025/26:3774 av Emma Nohrén m.fl. (MP) yrkande 40.

Riksdag decision: The Riksdag rejected 79 proposals in motions from the ordinary motion period 2025 concerning shipping matters. The proposals concern, among other things, Swedish shipping competitiveness, icebreaking, environmental and climate issues and recreational boating matters. The Riksdag refers, among other things, to measures taken and that work is already underway in the areas covered by the proposals.

Counter-proposals

Plan vs actual vote

Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.

VVänsterpartietNoNofollows the planderived

The plan starts from a climate emergency and demands strengthened steering based on sharpened climate goals and a coordinated strategy for electrifying transport.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan starts from a climate emergency and demands strengthened steering based on sharpened climate goals and a coordinated strategy for electrifying transport. It wants to steer heavy transport to sustainable maritime transport, which presupposes that shipping itself transforms. A national goal for fossil-free fuels with state investment support and systematic follow-up of maritime environmental impact follows from this.

Original (Swedish)

Planen utgår från ett klimatnödläge och kräver stärkt styrning utifrån skärpta klimatmål samt en sammanhållen strategi för elektrifiering av transporterna. Den vill styra tunga transporter till hållbar sjöfart, vilket förutsätter att sjöfarten själv ställer om. Ett nationellt mål för fossilfria drivmedel med statligt investeringsstöd och systematisk uppföljning av havsmiljöpåverkan följer av detta.

  • sharpened climate goals and steeringdecisive»Investeringar i grön teknik, industri och infrastruktur, utbyggd energikapacitet och stärkt styrning utifrån nya, skärpta klimatmål behövs.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Investments in green technology, industry, and infrastructure, expanded energy capacity, and strengthened steering based on new, sharpened climate goals are needed.”
  • sustainable maritime transport»Tunga transporter behöver styras till järnväg och hållbar sjöfart.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Heavy transport needs to be steered to rail and sustainable maritime transport.”
  • coordinated transport transition»en sammanhållen strategi för elektrifiering av transporterna, där stadsplanering, kollektivtrafik och elfordon alla har viktiga roller att spela.« (party programme ↗)“a coordinated strategy for electrifying transport, where urban planning, public transport, and electric vehicles all have important roles to play.”
  • climate emergency»Vi befinner oss i ett klimatnödläge.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We are in a climate emergency.”
SSocialdemokraternaNoAbstaindeparts from the planderived

The plan's goal is that Sweden shall become the world's first fossil-free welfare state and that Sweden shall go ahead, which supports the counter-proposal's requirement for a national goal for fossil-free fuels in shipping instead of merely relying on international rules.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan's goal is that Sweden shall become the world's first fossil-free welfare state and that Sweden shall go ahead, which supports the counter-proposal's requirement for a national goal for fossil-free fuels in shipping instead of merely relying on international rules. The plan also wants to increase Swedish production of renewable fuels and break dependence on fossil fuels from other countries. State investment support is in line with the plan's green investment line.

Original (Swedish)

Planens mål är att Sverige ska bli världens första fossilfria välfärdsnation och att Sverige ska gå före, vilket bär motförslagets krav på ett nationellt mål för fossilfria drivmedel i sjöfarten i stället för att enbart luta sig mot internationella regler. Planen vill också öka den svenska produktionen av förnybara drivmedel och bryta beroendet av fossila bränslen från andra länder. Statligt investeringsstöd ligger i linje med planens gröna investeringslinje.

  • fossil-free welfare statedecisive»Sverige ska bli världens första fossilfria välfärdsnation.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden shall become the world's first fossil-free welfare state.”
  • Sweden goes ahead»Genom att gå före kan Sverige göra en insats både för klimatet och för tillväxten i vårt land.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“By going ahead, Sweden can make a contribution both to the climate and for growth in our country.”
  • more renewable fuels»Vi vill öka den svenska produktionen av förnybara drivmedel, så att det blir lättare att tanka fossilfritt i Sverige.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to increase Swedish production of renewable fuels so that it becomes easier to fill up fossil-free in Sweden.”
  • broken fossil dependence»Stopp för svenskt beroende av fossila bränslen från andra länder.« (party programme ↗)“Stop for Swedish dependence on fossil fuels from other countries.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

MPMiljöpartietNoNofollows the planexplicit

The plan explicitly wants to get shipping emissions into the emissions trading system and shift freight traffic to fossil-free fuels, with legally binding climate goals as the foundation.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan explicitly wants to get shipping emissions into the emissions trading system and shift freight traffic to fossil-free fuels, with legally binding climate goals as the foundation. A national target for fossil-free fuels and state investment support are direct means for this. The plan also establishes that the seas can only be saved if emissions from fossil fuels and environmental poisons are stopped, which supports the requirement for follow-up of sea environment impact.

Original (Swedish)

Planen vill uttryckligen få in sjöfartens utsläpp i utsläppshandeln och ställa om godstrafiken till fossilfria drivmedel, med juridiskt bindande klimatmål som grund. Ett nationellt mål för fossilfria drivmedel och statligt investeringsstöd är direkta medel för det. Planen slår också fast att haven bara kan räddas om utsläppen från fossila bränslen och miljögifter stoppas, vilket bär kravet på uppföljning av havsmiljöpåverkan.

  • sjöfartens utsläpp prissättsdecisive»inkludera utsläpp från flyg och sjöfart i systemet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“include emissions from aviation and shipping in the system”
  • fossilfria drivmedel i godstrafiken»fossilfrihet – genom effektivare logistik och fordon, fossilfria drivmedel samt en« (party programme ↗)“fossil freedom – through more efficient logistics and vehicles, fossil-free fuels and a”
  • bindande klimatmål»juridiskt bindande klimatmål som ligger i linje med forskningen.« (party programme ↗)“legally binding climate goals that are in line with research.”
  • skydda havsmiljön»haven ska kunna räddas måste utsläppen från fossila bränslen och miljögifter stoppas« (party programme ↗)“the seas can only be saved if emissions from fossil fuels and environmental poisons are stopped”
CCenterpartietNoAbstaindeparts from the planderived

The plan says that more needs to be done for maritime shipping to switch to renewable fuels with strengthened competitiveness, that transport emissions should be removed and that production of biofuels should be manyfold increased.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan says that more needs to be done for maritime shipping to switch to renewable fuels with strengthened competitiveness, that transport emissions should be removed and that production of biofuels should be manyfold increased. It additionally wants to save lakes, watercourses and seas. A national target for fossil-free fuels, investment support and follow-up of sea environmental impact answer these commitments.

Original (Swedish)

Planen säger att mer behöver göras för att sjöfarten ska ställa om till förnybara drivmedel med stärkt konkurrenskraft, att transporternas utsläpp ska bort och att produktionen av biobränslen ska mångdubblas. Den vill dessutom rädda sjöar, vattendrag och hav. Ett nationellt mål för fossilfria drivmedel, investeringsstöd och uppföljning av havsmiljöpåverkan svarar mot dessa åtaganden.

  • maritime shipping's transitiondecisive»Mer behöver göras för att flyget, sjöfarten och jordbruket ska kunna ställa om till förnybara drivmedel med stärkt konkurrenskraft.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“More needs to be done for aviation, maritime shipping and agriculture to be able to switch to renewable fuels with strengthened competitiveness.”
  • emission-free transport»Transporternas utsläpp ska bort och ny utsläppsfri infrastruktur ska komma på plats.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Transport emissions shall be removed and new emission-free infrastructure shall be put in place.”
  • more renewable fuels»Sveriges energioberoende måste stärkas, bland annat genom att mångdubbla produktionen av biobränslen och biogas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden's energy independence must be strengthened, among other things through manyfold increased production of biofuels and biogas.”
  • protect the sea environment»Rädda Sveriges sjöar, vattendrag och hav. Våra barn ska kunna bada utan att utsättas för gifter, nedskräpning eller algblomning.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Save Sweden's lakes, watercourses and seas. Our children shall be able to swim without being exposed to poisons, litter or algal blooms.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

LLiberalernaYesYesfollows the planderived

The plan builds climate policy on real climate taxes instead of subsidies and symbolic measures, and wants economic policy instruments primarily coordinated at EU level and through international agreements for long-distance transport.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan builds climate policy on real climate taxes instead of subsidies and symbolic measures, and wants economic policy instruments primarily coordinated at EU level and through international agreements for long-distance transport. A national investment support and a climate leap for shipping are precisely the subsidy policy the plan rejects, although the goal of fossil-free transport is shared.

Original (Swedish)

Planen bygger klimatpolitiken på riktiga klimatskatter i stället för bidrag och symbolåtgärder, och vill att de ekonomiska styrmedlen i första hand samordnas på EU-nivå och genom internationella överenskommelser för långväga transporter. Ett nationellt investeringsstöd och ett klimatkliv för sjöfarten är just den bidragspolitik planen avvisar, även om målet om fossilfria transporter delas.

  • policy instruments before subsidiesdecisive»Därför är vi för riktiga klimatskatter i stället för att göra klimatpolitiken till en tävling i högst bidrag och flest symbolskatter.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Therefore we are for real climate taxes instead of making climate policy into a competition in the most subsidies and most symbolic taxes.”
  • policy instruments coordinated in the EU»De ekonomiska styrmedlen bör i första hand samordnas på EU-nivå, till exempel« (party programme ↗)“Economic policy instruments should primarily be coordinated at EU level, for example”
  • international agreements»Internationella överenskommelser behövs om skatt« (party programme ↗)“International agreements are needed about tax”
  • all transport types bear their costs»Beroendet av fossila bränslen måste brytas och alla transportslag måste stå för sina« (party programme ↗)“Dependence on fossil fuels must be broken and all transport types must account for their”
KDKristdemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan requires that fossil fuels be phased out from both the energy and transport sectors and that renewable fuels be favoured through taxation, which supports the counter-proposal's requirement for a national goal for fossil-free fuels in shipping.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan requires that fossil fuels be phased out from both the energy and transport sectors and that renewable fuels be favoured through taxation, which supports the counter-proposal's requirement for a national goal for fossil-free fuels in shipping. It also wants policy to support and accelerate development and use of energy-efficient vehicles and non-fossil fuels, which corresponds to the requirement for a climate step for shipping. The plan's rejection of direct business subsidies at the same time sets a limit on how investment support is designed.

Original (Swedish)

Planen kräver att fossilbränslena fasas ut från såväl energi- som transportsektorn och att förnybara bränslen gynnas skattemässigt, vilket bär motförslagets krav på ett nationellt mål för fossilfria drivmedel i sjöfarten. Den vill också att politiken understödjer och påskyndar utveckling och användning av energieffektiva fordon och icke-fossila drivmedel, vilket motsvarar kravet på ett klimatkliv för sjöfarten. Planens avvisande av direkta företagssubventioner sätter samtidigt en gräns för hur investeringsstödet utformas.

  • phase out fossil fuelsdecisive»Fossilbränslena måste fasas ut från såväl energi- som transportsektorn.« (party programme ↗)“Fossil fuels must be phased out from both the energy and transport sectors.”
  • favour renewable fuels»Förnyelsebara bränslen måste skattemässigt gynnas.« (party programme ↗)“Renewable fuels must be favoured through taxation.”
  • accelerate the transition»understödja och påskynda utveckling, produktion och användning av energieffektiva fordon« (party programme ↗)“support and accelerate development, production and use of energy-efficient vehicles”
  • no direct business subsidies»Direkta företagssubventioner avvisas.« (party programme ↗)“Direct business subsidies are rejected.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

MModeraternaYesYesfollows the planderived

The plan explicitly rejects expensive symbolism and narrow climate nationalism and points out that emissions reductions are often cheaper through international initiatives.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan explicitly rejects expensive symbolism and narrow climate nationalism and points out that emissions reductions are often cheaper through international initiatives. A particular national goal and new government investment support for maritime transport are precisely the kind of national solution the plan does not commit to. The plan instead invests in biofuels and electrification broadly in the transport sector.

Original (Swedish)

Planen avvisar uttryckligen dyrbar symbolpolitik och snäv klimatnationalism och pekar på att utsläppsminskningar ofta är billigare genom internationella insatser. Ett särskilt nationellt mål och nya statliga investeringsstöd för sjöfarten är just den nationella särlösning planen inte utfäster. Planen satsar i stället på biodrivmedel och elektrifiering brett i transportsektorn.

  • no climate nationalismdecisive»Klimatpolitiken får aldrig reduceras till dyrbar symbolpolitik eller snäv klimatnationalism.« (party programme ↗)“Climate policy must never be reduced to expensive symbolism or narrow climate nationalism.”
  • cost-effective climate benefit»Samtidigt är kostnaden för att minska utsläppen genom internationella klimatinsatser ofta mycket lägre än för att minska utsläppen i Sverige« (2022 manifesto ↗)“At the same time, the cost of reducing emissions through international climate initiatives is often much lower than reducing emissions in Sweden”
  • electrification of transport»Vår politik syftar därför till att ställa om transportsektorn genom elektrifiering.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Our policy therefore aims to transform the transport sector through electrification.”
  • biofuels without new special support»Satsa på tillverkning av biodrivmedel« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Invest in biofuel production”
SDSverigedemokraternaYesYesfollows the planderived

The counter-proposal wants to introduce a national target for fossil-free fuels in shipping as well as government investment support and a climate leap.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The counter-proposal wants to introduce a national target for fossil-free fuels in shipping as well as government investment support and a climate leap. The plan requires that Swedish climate targets be adapted to EU level instead of Sweden doing more than necessary at the expense of competitiveness, and that climate funds be invested where they reduce emissions most per crown. A national separate target with subsidies is therefore something the plan speaks against.

Original (Swedish)

Motförslaget vill införa ett nationellt mål för fossilfria drivmedel i sjöfarten samt statligt investeringsstöd och ett klimatkliv. Planen kräver att de svenska klimatmålen anpassas till EU-nivån i stället för att Sverige gör mer än nödvändigt på bekostnad av konkurrenskraften, och att klimatmedel satsas där de minskar utsläppen mest per krona. Ett nationellt särmål med subventioner är därmed något planen talar emot.

  • klimatmål på EU-nivådecisive»De svenska klimatmålen bör anpassas till den klimatlagstiftning som finns på EU-nivå för att inte kraven på andra länder ska bli lägre som en konsekvens av att vi gör mer än nödvändigt på bekostnad av vår levnadsstandard och konkurrenskraft.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Swedish climate targets should be adapted to the climate legislation that exists at EU level so that requirements on other countries do not become lower as a consequence of us doing more than necessary at the expense of our standard of living and competitiveness.”
  • utsläppsminskning per krona»Satsa på åtgärder som minskar utsläppen mest per satsad krona som t ex internationella klimatinvesteringar« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Invest in measures that reduce emissions the most per invested crown such as international climate investments”
  • globalt perspektiv»Bedriva en effektiv klimatpolitik med ett tydligt globalt perspektiv« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Conduct effective climate policy with a clear global perspective”
  • stoppa symbolpolitik»Stoppa symbolpolitik som går ut över möjligheten att bedriva industri och näring« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Stop symbolic politics that hinders the possibility of conducting industry and business”

Share and embed

Embed as a widget (iframe): previewSizeLanguage

Sources and documents

Documents under consideration

Source: The Swedish Parliament