2025-06-102024/25:TU14 · p.13TUTransport & infrastructure

Vision checks and tests for elderly at driving license renewal

Vision checks and health tests for older drivers at licence renewal

What's at stake: The decision affects how driving licences for older drivers are checked going forward, weighing the benefit of detecting drivers with impaired vision or health earlier against the costs and consequences for the licence holders who would be subject to new requirements.

Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.

What the vote decides

The question is whether mandatory vision or health checks should be introduced for older drivers at licence renewal, or whether the current system without such recurring checks should be kept.

Yes Yes — the committee proposal

The committee rejects the motions on vision checks and health tests for older drivers at licence renewal. It refers to the fact that the Swedish Transport Agency has already investigated the benefit of recurring health checks for older drivers and found no reason to proceed, since the consequences for licence holders and the increased healthcare costs are disproportionate to the marginal safety effect expected. The committee also points out that most older drivers adjust their driving to their abilities, that doctors' existing duty to report already makes it easier to identify unsuitable drivers, and that medical requirements are also being addressed in the work on a new EU driving-licence directive.

No No — the reservations

Reservation 12 (V, C)

The reservation (V, C) wants an inquiry to examine whether it would be reasonable to introduce mandatory vision tests for private individuals at licence renewal after a certain age. The reasoning is that current rules require no vision examinations for private individuals after the original test taken when obtaining the licence, even as a driver's ability to perceive the traffic environment through their senses remains crucial as technology - such as self-driving cars - develops.

Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.

VSMPCLKDMSD
YesNoAbstainAbsent

What do the votes mean here?

Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).

No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 12 by V, C.

Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.

What each plan points to — and how the party voted

For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.

PlanVoteConfidenceEvidence
Vown reservationNoNo 0/20/0/4follows the planconfidence: lownot addressed
SYesYes 93/0/0/13follows the planconfidence: lownot addressed
MPNoYes 14/0/0/4departs from the planconfidence: lownot addressed
Cown reservationYesNo 0/17/0/7departs from the planconfidence: lownot addressed
LYesYes 14/0/0/2follows the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
KDYesYes 15/0/0/4follows the planconfidence: lownot addressed
MYesYes 59/0/0/9follows the planconfidence: lownot addressed
SDYesYes 60/0/0/12follows the planconfidence: mediumderived

Committee proposal

The Riksdag rejects the motions 2024/25:1549 by Jörgen Grubb (SD), 2024/25:1663 by Camilla Rinaldo Miller (KD), 2024/25:2409 by Magnus Resare (M) claims 1 and 2 as well as 2024/25:2947 by Ulrika Heie et al. (C) claim 27.

Original (Swedish)

Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2024/25:1549 av Jörgen Grubb (SD), 2024/25:1663 av Camilla Rinaldo Miller (KD), 2024/25:2409 av Magnus Resare (M) yrkandena 1 och 2 samt 2024/25:2947 av Ulrika Heie m.fl. (C) yrkande 27.

Riksdag decision: The Riksdag rejected approximately 110 proposals on various traffic safety issues in motions from the general motion period of 2024. The proposals concern, among other things, speed limits and speed monitoring, measures against alcohol and drugs in traffic, traffic safety for mopeds and A-tractors, as well as driver training and driving licenses. The Riksdag refers, among other things, to planned or already taken measures and that work is ongoing on several of the issues that the proposals address.

Counter-proposals

Plan vs actual vote

Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.

VVänsterpartietNoNofollows the plannot addressed

The documents say nothing about licence renewal or health checks for older drivers.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The documents say nothing about licence renewal or health checks for older drivers. The closest underlying principle is that healthcare should be seen as part of broader public health work and that society should act to prevent people from being harmed. On the basis of that principle, a review of vision tests is a reasonable preventive step, but the conclusion is derived and uncertain.

Original (Swedish)

Dokumenten säger ingenting om körkortsförnyelse eller hälsokontroller för äldre förare. Närmast liggande princip är att vården ska ses som en del av ett bredare folkhälsoarbete och att samhället ska agera för att förhindra att människor skadas. Utifrån den principen är en utredning av syntester ett rimligt förebyggande steg, men slutsatsen är härledd och osäker.

  • broad public health perspectivedecisive»Vården behöver ses som en del i det bredare arbetet med folkhälsa.« (party programme ↗)“Healthcare needs to be seen as part of the broader work on public health.”
  • society should prevent harm»Ingen människa ska behöva utsättas för brott. Samhället behöver« (party programme ↗)“No person should have to be exposed to crime. Society needs”
  • care for older people»Vi vill investera i högre kvalitet i omsorgen för äldre och personer med« (party programme ↗)“We want to invest in higher quality in care for older people and people with”
SSocialdemokraternaYesYesfollows the plannot addressed

The plan says nothing about driving licences or health checks for drivers.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan says nothing about driving licences or health checks for drivers. The closest underlying principle is that age shall not be allowed to determine people's freedom and that the continued participation of older people in social life shall be valued, which argues against introducing a new mandatory requirement that only affects older people. The position is therefore derived from a general principle and uncertain.

Original (Swedish)

Planen säger ingenting om körkort eller hälsokontroller för förare. Närmast liggande princip är att ålder inte ska få avgöra människors frihet och att äldres fortsatta delaktighet i samhällslivet ska värnas, vilket talar emot att införa ett nytt obligatoriskt krav som enbart träffar äldre. Ställningstagandet är därför härlett ur en allmän princip och osäkert.

  • age shall not limit freedomdecisive»Klass och kön ska inte få avgöra människors frihet, och inte heller faktorer som etnicitet och trosuppfattning, sexuell läggning, könsidentitet, funktionsnedsättningar och ålder.« (party programme ↗)“Class and gender shall not determine people's freedom, and neither shall factors like ethnicity and religion, sexual orientation, gender identity, disabilities and age.”
  • participation after retirement»Ett fortsatt socialt engagemang och sammanhang är en viktig faktor för att behålla ett gott liv också efter pensioneringen.« (party programme ↗)“Continued social engagement and community is an important factor in maintaining a good life after retirement.”
  • removed obstacles for participation»Undanröjda hinder för personer med funktionsnedsättning att delta i samhällslivet.« (party programme ↗)“Removed obstacles for persons with disabilities to participate in social life.”
MPMiljöpartietNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan does not address health checks for driving licence renewal.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan does not address health checks for driving licence renewal. The closest principle is that transports should occur with high traffic standards and maintained traffic safety, which argues for at least investigating mandatory eye tests. The plan emphasizes elderly self-determination and countryside car dependence at the same time, which makes the conclusion uncertain.

Original (Swedish)

Planen behandlar inte hälsokontroller vid körkortsförnyelse. Närmast liggande princip är att transporterna ska ske med hög trafikstandard och upprätthållen trafiksäkerhet, vilket talar för att åtminstone utreda obligatoriska syntester. Planen betonar samtidigt äldres självbestämmande och landsbygdens bilberoende, vilket gör slutsatsen osäker.

  • upprätthållen trafiksäkerhetdecisive»De transporter som ändå behöver utföras ska ske med trafikslag, fordon och drivmedel som har liten miljöpåverkan samtidigt som en hög trafikstandard och trafiksäkerhet upprätthålls.« (party programme ↗)“The transports that still need to be carried out shall occur with traffic modes, vehicles and fuels that have low environmental impact while maintaining a high traffic standard and traffic safety.”
  • äldres självbestämmande»Ett rikt liv kännetecknas av självbestämmande,« (party programme ↗)“A rich life is characterized by self-determination,”
  • landsbygdens bilberoende»Många på landsbygden är beroende av bilen, även med en utbyggd kollektivtrafik.« (party programme ↗)“Many in the countryside are dependent on the car, even with expanded public transport.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

CCenterpartietYesNodeparts from the plannot addressed

The party programme opposes paternalism and combats special treatment on grounds including age, which speaks against mandatory tests triggered only by the driver's age.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The party programme opposes paternalism and combats special treatment on grounds including age, which speaks against mandatory tests triggered only by the driver's age. The election manifesto's promise of increased freedom and accessibility in all parts of the country also carries great weight since the car is necessary in rural areas. The plan does not address licence testing, so the position rests on general principles.

Original (Swedish)

Partiprogrammet motsätter sig förmynderi och bekämpar särbehandling som sker på grund av bland annat ålder, vilket talar mot obligatoriska tester som utlöses enbart av förarens ålder. Valmanifestets löfte om ökad frihet och tillgänglighet i alla delar av landet väger också tungt eftersom bilen är nödvändig på landsbygden. Planen berör inte körkortsprövning, så ställningstagandet vilar på allmänna principer.

  • freedom from paternalismdecisive»Det är därför vi försvarar alla människors frihet från förmynderi och påtvingad kollektivism.« (party programme ↗)“This is why we defend all people's freedom from paternalism and forced collectivism.”
  • no special treatment by age»Det har ingen betydelse på vilken grund detta sker; kön, ålder, sexuell läggning, könsidentitet, könsuttryck, funktionsnedsättning, trosuppfattning eller etnicitet.« (party programme ↗)“The reason is of no importance; gender, age, sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, disability, religious belief or ethnicity.”
  • accessibility throughout the country»Alla delar av Sverige ska se ökad frihet, trygghet och tillgänglighet nästa mandatperiod.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“All parts of Sweden shall see increased freedom, security and accessibility next election period.”
  • traffic safety through road upgrading»Vi vill rusta upp vägarna, göra dem mer trafiksäkra för alla trafikanter, förbättra belysningen, vägunderhållet året runt och bygga fler laddstolpar och snabbladdare i hela landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to upgrade roads, make them safer for all road users, improve lighting, road maintenance year-round and build more charging stations and fast-charging points throughout the country.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

LLiberalernaYesYesfollows the plannot addressed

The plan asserts older people's right to self-determination and requires that all tendencies to age discrimination be combated and that the ban on age discrimination is strong and effective.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan asserts older people's right to self-determination and requires that all tendencies to age discrimination be combated and that the ban on age discrimination is strong and effective. A mandatory test triggered by the driver passing a certain age is precisely such age-based special treatment. The plan also recognizes the car's role for the individual's mobility, so the counter-proposal's demand is rejected.

Original (Swedish)

Planen hävdar äldres rätt till självbestämmande och kräver att alla tendenser till åldersfördomar bekämpas och att förbudet mot åldersdiskriminering är starkt och effektivt. Ett obligatoriskt test som utlöses av att föraren passerat en viss ålder är just en sådan åldersgrundad särbehandling. Planen erkänner dessutom bilens roll för den enskildes rörlighet, varför motförslagets krav avvisas.

  • older people's self-determinationdecisive»Äldres rätt till självbestämmande ska hävdas och alla tendenser till åldersfördomar bekämpas.« (party programme ↗)“Older people's right to self-determination shall be asserted and all tendencies to age discrimination shall be combated.”
  • ban on age discrimination»Förbudet mot åldersdiskriminering ska vara starkt och effektivt.« (party programme ↗)“The ban on age discrimination shall be strong and effective.”
  • the car's role for mobility»Transportpolitiken måste erkänna bilens roll på landsbygden.« (party programme ↗)“Transport policy must recognize the car's role in the countryside.”
  • older people's continued participation»Att äldre ges större möjlighet att fortsätta arbeta ökar den enskildes valfrihet och förbättrar« (party programme ↗)“Giving older people greater opportunity to continue working increases individual choice and improves”
KDKristdemokraternaYesYesfollows the plannot addressed

The election manifesto wants to build a society where people can age in security and dignity without age discrimination and facilitate for elderly people to continue being active, while the plan emphasizes that access to a car for many is a prerequisite for being able to live and work.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The election manifesto wants to build a society where people can age in security and dignity without age discrimination and facilitate for elderly people to continue being active, while the plan emphasizes that access to a car for many is a prerequisite for being able to live and work. A requirement tied to a certain age affects elderly people as a group rather than the individual's ability. The zero vision points the other way, so the basis is weak.

Original (Swedish)

Valmanifestet vill bygga ett samhälle där människor kan åldras i trygghet och värdighet utan åldersdiskriminering och underlätta för äldre att fortsätta vara aktiva, medan planen framhåller att tillgång till bil för många är en förutsättning för att kunna leva och verka. Ett krav som knyts till en viss ålder träffar äldre som grupp snarare än den enskildes förmåga. Nollvisionen talar åt andra hållet, så underlaget är svagt.

  • no age discriminationdecisive»Vi vill bygga ett samhälle där människor kan åldras i trygghet och värdighet utan åldersdiskriminering.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to build a society where people can age in security and dignity without age discrimination.”
  • car as prerequisite for life»Tillgång till bil är för många en förutsättning för att« (party programme ↗)“Access to a car is for many a prerequisite for”
  • elderly people's continued activity»Skattelättnad för äldre (69+) som vill och kan fortsätta arbeta.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Tax relief for elderly (69+) who want and can continue working.”
  • zero vision in traffic»Det är viktigt med en nollvision för dödsfall och svåra« (party programme ↗)“It is important with a zero vision for deaths and severe”
MModeraternaYesYesfollows the plannot addressed

The plan does not address health checks or eye tests upon driving licence renewal.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan does not address health checks or eye tests upon driving licence renewal. The closest principles are that the primary responsibility lies with the individual themselves and that authorities' requirements and processing should be simplified and shortened, which speaks against introducing new mandatory tests for individuals with only marginal safety gain. The plan's traffic safety commitment concerns road condition, not recurring driver checks.

Original (Swedish)

Planen behandlar inte hälsokontroller eller syntester vid körkortsförnyelse. Närmast liggande principer är att huvudansvaret ligger på individen själv och att myndigheternas krav och handläggning ska förenklas och kortas, vilket talar emot att införa nya obligatoriska prov för enskilda med enbart marginell säkerhetsvinst. Planens trafiksäkerhetsåtagande gäller vägarnas skick, inte återkommande kontroller av förare.

  • individens eget ansvardecisive»Huvudansvaret ligger först och främst på individen.« (party programme ↗)“Primary responsibility lies first and foremost with the individual.”
  • mindre administrativ börda»Korta myndigheternas handläggningstider genom en bortre tidsgräns« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Shorten authorities' processing times through an outer time limit”
  • trafiksäkerhet genom vägunderhåll»Laga Sveriges vägar så att du kan komma fram säkert och i tid« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Fix Sweden's roads so that you can get there safely and on time”
SDSverigedemokraternaYesYesfollows the planderived

The plan states that the car for most people is not a luxury and that mobility is fundamental for those living where distances are long.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan states that the car for most people is not a luxury and that mobility is fundamental for those living where distances are long. Mandatory driving tests upon driver's licence renewal after a certain age places a new obstacle precisely on these groups. The plan furthermore demands clear results for every public investment and that unnecessary public expenditure is scaled down, which speaks against a costly check with marginal effect.

Original (Swedish)

Planen slår fast att bilen för de allra flesta inte är någon lyx och att mobilitet är grundläggande för dem som bor där avstånden är långa. Obligatoriska syntester vid körkortsförnyelse efter en viss ålder lägger ett nytt hinder på just dessa grupper. Planen kräver dessutom tydliga resultat för varje offentlig satsning och att onödiga offentliga utgifter skalas bort, vilket talar mot en kostsam kontroll med marginell effekt.

  • the car as necessitydecisive»Bilen är för de allra flesta ingen lyx.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The car is for most people not a luxury.”
  • mobility in rural areas»Mobilitet är grundläggande för att människor ska kunna leva och verka i mindre orter där avstånden till jobb och offentlig service är längre.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Mobility is fundamental for people to be able to live and work in smaller towns where distances to jobs and public services are longer.”
  • results requirement on initiatives»Begära tydliga resultat för varje offentlig satsning« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Demand clear results for every public investment”
  • avoid unnecessary costs»Skala bort onödiga utgifter i det offentliga« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Scale down unnecessary expenditure in the public sector”

Share and embed

Embed as a widget (iframe): previewSizeLanguage

Sources and documents

Documents under consideration

Source: The Swedish Parliament