2024-04-032023/24:KU16 · p.4KUConstitution
Regulation of lobbyists
Regulation of lobbyists and a mandatory lobbying register
What's at stake: The decision affects how openly the public can see which interests meet with decision-makers and when - a matter concerning all citizens who want to track who influences politics, as well as the organisations and companies engaged in lobbying.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether a mandatory, public lobbying register covering parliament, government, agencies and potentially municipalities and regions should be established now by parliamentary decision, or whether the matter should await the parliamentary committee already tasked with reviewing transparency in lobbying contacts.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee rejects the motions on regulating lobbyists. The reason is that the 2023 transparency committee has already been tasked with investigating strengthened insight and transparency in the financing of political parties, including whether a requirement for transparency around contacts between political decision-makers and lobbyists should be introduced and, if so, how it should be designed and administered. The committee therefore considers several motions calling for this to be investigated already addressed, and sees no reason to expand the committee's mandate at this stage.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 9 (MP)
The reservation (MP) calls for the government to already establish now that the lobbying register to be reviewed by the appointed committee will be mandatory, public, and cover meetings and actors within parliament, government and agencies, and preferably regions and municipalities too. The reasoning is that lobbying itself is valuable to democracy, but citizens need insight into which interests are influencing political decisions.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 9 by MP.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
What each plan points to — and how the party voted
For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| Plan | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Yes 21/0/0/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| S | No | Abstain 0/0/92/14 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| MP | No | No 0/14/0/4 | follows the plan | confidence: high | not addressed |
| C | No | Abstain 0/0/21/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: high | explicit |
| L | No | Yes 14/0/0/2 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| KD | No | Yes 15/0/0/4 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| M | Yes | Yes 60/0/0/8 | follows the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| SD | No | Yes 63/0/0/9 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2023/24:2007 by Peter Hultqvist et al. (S), 2023/24:2490 by Malin Björk et al. (C) point 14, 2023/24:2571 by Mattias Vepsä and Lawen Redar (both S), 2023/24:2669 by Märta Stenevi et al. (MP) point 160 and 2023/24:2685 by Ida Karkiainen et al. (S) point 5.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2023/24:2007 av Peter Hultqvist m.fl. (S), 2023/24:2490 av Malin Björk m.fl. (C) yrkande 14, 2023/24:2571 av Mattias Vepsä och Lawen Redar (båda S), 2023/24:2669 av Märta Stenevi m.fl. (MP) yrkande 160 och 2023/24:2685 av Ida Karkiainen m.fl. (S) yrkande 5.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag rejected approximately 90 proposals in motions regarding constitutional matters from the general motions period 2023. The motions dealt with, among other things, EU membership, subsidiarity testing within the EU and party financing, regulation of lobbyists and changes in legislation on cooling-off periods for ministers and senior civil servants. The Riksdag refers, among other things, to ongoing work.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to tighten regulation of anonymous party donations and restrict foreign financing of political parties. (MP) — Reservation 9
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The party programme makes the principle of public access and the right to scrutinize those in power into cornerstones of democracy, and warns that decision-makers adapt themselves to powerful economic interests beyond public control.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme makes the principle of public access and the right to scrutinize those in power into cornerstones of democracy, and warns that decision-makers adapt themselves to powerful economic interests beyond public control. The election manifesto requires that the role of politics is re-established and that accountability is demanded from those who decide. A mandatory and public lobby register is precisely such a transparency instrument and is therefore supported by the plan's principles.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet gör offentlighetsprincipen och rätten att granska makthavarna till grundbultar i demokratin och varnar för att beslutsfattare anpassar sig till mäktiga ekonomiska intressen bortom folkets kontroll. Valplattformen kräver att politikens roll återupprättas och att ansvar utkrävs av dem som bestämmer. Ett obligatoriskt och offentligt lobbyregister är just ett sådant insynsinstrument och stöds därför av planens principer.
- public access as foundation of democracydecisive»föreningsfriheten, yttrande- och tryckfriheten, offentlighetsprincipen« (party programme ↗)“freedom of association, freedom of expression and freedom of the press, and the principle of public access”
- right to scrutinize those in power»delta i offentlig debatt, granska makthavarna« (party programme ↗)“participate in public debate, scrutinize those in power”
- economic interests control politics»beslutsfattare anpassar sig till mäktiga ekonomiska intressen bortom« (party programme ↗)“decision-makers adapt themselves to powerful economic interests beyond”
- demand accountability from those in power»Att återupprätta politikens roll, och utkräva ansvar från de som bestämmer, är något som du är med och gör.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Re-establishing the role of politics, and demanding accountability from those who decide, is something you are part of doing.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan builds the entire democratic process and public administration on openness and transparency, and enjoins parties and public bodies to with all force prevent any form of improper influence.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan builds the entire democratic process and public administration on openness and transparency, and enjoins parties and public bodies to with all force prevent any form of improper influence. A mandatory and public lobbying register gives citizens precisely that insight into which interests influence decisions. The plan already requires open disclosure of contributions from outside interests.
Original (Swedish)
Planen bygger hela den demokratiska processen och samhällsförvaltningen på offentlighet och insyn, och ålägger partier och offentliga organ att med all kraft förhindra varje form av otillbörlig påverkan. Ett obligatoriskt och offentligt lobbyregister ger medborgarna just den insynen i vilka intressen som påverkar besluten. Planen kräver redan öppen redovisning av bidrag från utomstående intressen.
- openness and transparencydecisive»Den demokratiska processen och samhällsförvaltningen måste bygga på offentlighet« (party programme ↗)“The democratic process and public administration must build on openness”
- prevent improper influence»ett gemensamt ansvar att med all kraft förhindra all form av otillbörlig påverkan« (party programme ↗)“a shared responsibility to with all force prevent all forms of improper influence”
- open disclosure of contributions»Partierna ska vara skyldiga att öppet redovisa de bidrag de erhåller« (party programme ↗)“Parties shall be obligated to openly disclose the contributions they receive”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The party programme states that influence shall not be determined by economic resources and that lobbying shall therefore be regulated, and that citizens shall always be able to scrutinize power.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme states that influence shall not be determined by economic resources and that lobbying shall therefore be regulated, and that citizens shall always be able to scrutinize power. A mandatory and public lobbying register that covers parliament, government and agencies is the concrete form for that transparency. The public access principle shall also be protected and strengthened.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet slår fast att inflytande inte ska avgöras av ekonomiska resurser och att lobbyismen därför ska regleras, samt att medborgarna alltid ska kunna granska makten. Ett obligatoriskt och offentligt lobbyregister som omfattar riksdag, regering och myndigheter är den konkreta formen för den insynen. Offentlighetsprincipen ska dessutom värnas och stärkas.
- regulated lobbyingdecisive»Inflytande ska inte avgöras av vilka ekonomiska resurser man har, och därför ska lobbyismen regleras« (party programme ↗)“Influence shall not be determined by what economic resources one has, and therefore lobbying shall be regulated”
- citizen scrutiny of power»Medborgarna ska alltid kunna granska makten.« (party programme ↗)“Citizens shall always be able to scrutinize power.”
- public access principle protected»Offentlighetsprincipen och meddelarfriheten måste värnas och stärkas.« (party programme ↗)“The public access principle and freedom of expression must be protected and strengthened.”
- easily accessible information»En deltagande demokrati kräver lättillgänglig information« (party programme ↗)“Participatory democracy requires easily accessible information”
The election manifesto explicitly promises to introduce a lobby register as part of work for a more transparent Sweden.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto explicitly promises to introduce a lobby register as part of work for a more transparent Sweden. The counter-proposal's demand for a mandatory and public register covering parliament, government and agencies is exactly this commitment. The party programme sees openness and transparency as fundamental preconditions to prevent corruption.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet lovar uttryckligen att införa ett lobbyregister som en del av arbetet för ett mer transparent Sverige. Motförslagets krav på ett obligatoriskt och offentligt register som omfattar riksdag, regering och myndigheter är just detta åtagande. Partiprogrammet ser öppenhet och transparens som grundförutsättningar för att förhindra korruption.
- introduce a lobby registerdecisive»Vi vill inrätta en antikorruptionsmyndighet, skärpa regler mot korruption och införa ett lobbyregister.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We wish to establish an anti-corruption agency, tighten rules against corruption and introduce a lobby register.”
- increased transparency»Sverige ska bli ännu mer transparent.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden shall become even more transparent.”
- openness against corruption»Öppenhet och transparens är grundförutsättningar för frihet, demokrati och för att förhindra korruption och övergrepp.« (party programme ↗)“Openness and transparency are fundamental preconditions for freedom, democracy and to prevent corruption and abuse.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan establishes that the principle of public access has fundamental importance for democracy and that documents shall be made more accessible to facilitate transparency.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that the principle of public access has fundamental importance for democracy and that documents shall be made more accessible to facilitate transparency. The same transparency idea carries the requirements for law-regulated disclosure of parties' financing and cooling-off rules for government ministers. A mandatory and public lobby register is an application of precisely this line.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att offentlighetsprincipen har grundläggande betydelse för folkstyret och att handlingar i större utsträckning ska göras tillgängliga för att underlätta insyn. Samma insynstanke bär kraven på lagreglerad redovisning av partiernas finansiering och på karensregler för statsråd. Ett obligatoriskt och offentligt lobbyregister är en tillämpning av just denna linje.
- transparency and oversightdecisive»Offentlighetsprincipen har en grundläggande betydelse« (party programme ↗)“The principle of public access has fundamental importance”
- accessible documents»Diarier och allmänna handlingar bör i större« (party programme ↗)“Diaries and official documents should to a greater”
- law-regulated party financing»källorna för sin finansiering ska vara reglerad i lag.« (party programme ↗)“sources of its financing shall be regulated in law.”
- scrutiny as democracy's lifeblood»Demokratins livsluft är att fler granskar, diskuterar och pekar ut samhällets brister.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Democracy's lifeblood is that more scrutinise, discuss and point out society's shortcomings.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The party programme makes the public access principle central to an open democracy and wants secrecy to be used restrictively.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme makes the public access principle central to an open democracy and wants secrecy to be used restrictively. It also requires that the decision-making process is surveyable for citizens so that responsibility can be demanded, which is precisely the oversight need the counter-proposal points to. An obligatory and public lobby register follows from these openness commitments.
Original (Swedish)
Principprogrammet gör offentlighetsprincipen central för en öppen demokrati och vill att sekretess nyttjas restriktivt. Det kräver också att beslutsprocessen är överblickbar för medborgarna så att ansvar kan utkrävas, vilket är just det insynsbehov motförslaget pekar på. Ett obligatoriskt och offentligt lobbyregister följer av dessa öppenhetsåtaganden.
- openness and restrictive secrecydecisive»Offentlighetsprincipen, det vill säga tillgången till allmänna handlingar, är central för en öppen och vital demokrati. Sekretessmöjligheten ska nyttjas restriktivt.« (party programme ↗)“The public access principle, that is access to public records, is central to an open and vital democracy. The secrecy option shall be used restrictively.”
- surveyable decision-making process»Beslutsprocessen måste vara överblickbar för medborgarna och därmed ge möjlighet att utkräva ansvar.« (party programme ↗)“The decision-making process must be surveyable for citizens and thereby provide the opportunity to demand responsibility.”
- continuous citizen participation»Det ideal som kristdemokraterna framhäver är en demokrati där varje medborgare ges möjligheter till deltagande, inflytande och delaktighet, inte bara vid valtillfället utan kontinuerligt.« (party programme ↗)“The ideal that the Christian Democrats emphasize is a democracy where every citizen is given opportunities for participation, influence and involvement, not only at election times but continuously.”
- avoid unnecessary bureaucracy»Byråkrati och krångliga regler ska motverkas.« (party programme ↗)“Bureaucracy and complicated rules shall be counteracted.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan contains no commitment to a lobby register, and its consistent line is to reduce red tape and bureaucracy rather than add new mandatory registration requirements for the Riksdag, government, authorities and municipalities.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan contains no commitment to a lobby register, and its consistent line is to reduce red tape and bureaucracy rather than add new mandatory registration requirements for the Riksdag, government, authorities and municipalities. Accountability in the plan happens instead through tightened civil service responsibility. A mandatory and comprehensive lobby register therefore goes beyond what the plan calls for.
Original (Swedish)
Planen innehåller inget åtagande om lobbyregister, och dess genomgående linje är att minska regelkrångel och byråkrati snarare än att lägga till nya obligatoriska registerkrav på riksdag, regering, myndigheter och kommuner. Ansvarsutkrävandet i planen sker i stället genom skärpt tjänstemannaansvar. Ett obligatoriskt och heltäckande lobbyregister går därför utöver vad planen efterfrågar.
- reduced red tapedecisive»Ta bort en tredjedel av företagens administrationskostnader och en tredjedel av regelkrånglet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Remove one third of companies' administrative costs and one third of red tape”
- regulation at minimum level»Minska regelkrånglet och onödig byråkrati, bland annat genom att motverka överimplementering i Sverige av EU-beslut – som huvudregel ska EU-direktiv genomföras på miniminivå« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Reduce red tape and unnecessary bureaucracy, including by counteracting over-implementation in Sweden of EU decisions - as a main principle EU directives should be implemented at minimum level”
- tightened civil service responsibility»Skärpa tjänstemannaansvaret så att du som skattebetalare vet att med all offentlig maktutövning följer ett ansvar för de beslut som fattas« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Tighten civil service responsibility so that you as a taxpayer know that with all public exercise of power comes responsibility for the decisions made”
- vibrant political life»Sverige ska ha ett levande politiskt liv« (party programme ↗)“Sweden should have a vibrant political life”
flags: citat_migrerat
The plan wants to implement measures that increase transparency and the opportunity for political accountability, and criticises an informal agency governance model that complicates precisely this.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to implement measures that increase transparency and the opportunity for political accountability, and criticises an informal agency governance model that complicates precisely this. The counter-proposal's requirement for a mandatory and public lobby register that covers the Riksdag, government and agencies is such a transparency measure. The plan also points out that organised interests are politically affiliated in a way that distorts democratic conditions.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill genomföra åtgärder som ökar transparensen och möjligheten till politiskt ansvarsutkrävande, och kritiserar en informell myndighetsstyrningsmodell som försvårar just detta. Motförslagets krav på ett obligatoriskt och offentligt lobbyregister som omfattar riksdag, regering och myndigheter är en sådan transparensåtgärd. Planen pekar också ut att organiserade intressen är partipolitiskt knutna på ett sätt som snedvrider de demokratiska förutsättningarna.
- increased transparencydecisive»Tjänstemannaansvar ska införas och åtgärder ska genomföras för att öka transparensen och möjligheten att utkräva politiskt ansvarsutkrävande.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Civil service responsibility should be implemented and measures should be undertaken to increase transparency and the opportunity to hold politicians accountable.”
- against informal power exercise»En politiserad utnämningsmakt tillsammans med en i hög grad informell myndighetsstyrningsmodell försvårar demokratiskt ansvarsutkrävande.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“A politicised appointment power combined with a highly informal agency governance model complicates democratic accountability.”
- insight into interest influence»Inom civilsamhället är både fackförbund och andra organisationer med viktiga samhällsuppdrag i hög grad partipolitiskt knutna på ett sätt som riskerar att snedvrida de demokratiska förutsättningarna.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Within civil society, both trade unions and other organisations with important societal assignments are highly politically affiliated in a way that risks distorting democratic conditions.”
- strengthened accountability»Sverigedemokraterna vill stärka möjligheter för ansvarsutkrävande när hanteringen av de offentliga resurserna brister.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden Democrats want to strengthen opportunities for accountability when the management of public resources falls short.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2023/24:KU16)
- Committee report full text (HB01KU16)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2023/24:1121 — Karensregler för tunga regeringsföreträdare av Jan Ericson (M)
- Motion 2023/24:1137 — Skydd för arbetare mot påtvingad partisponsring av Oliver Rosengren och Lars Beckman (båda M)
- Motion 2023/24:1149 — Former för att säkerställa medborgarnas informerade och fria åsikter vid folkomröstning av Staffan Eklöf (SD)
- Motion 2023/24:1156 — En mer demokratisk process vid ingående av avtal för Sveriges räkning av Staffan Eklöf (SD)
- Motion 2023/24:1157 — Folklig granskning inför ratificering av internationella avtal av Staffan Eklöf (SD)
- Motion 2023/24:1247 — Ett modernt statsskick av Niels Paarup-Petersen m.fl. (C, S, L, MP, V)
- Motion 2023/24:1299 — Grundlagsfästning av public service av Hanna Westerén (S)
- Motion 2023/24:1354 — Skydd för gemensam egendom av Niklas Karlsson och Joakim Sandell (båda S)
- Motion 2023/24:1395 — Värn för demokratin av Ann-Sofie Alm (M)
- Motion 2023/24:1457 — Riksrevisionens uppgift av Markus Wiechel och Alexander Christiansson (båda SD)
- Motion 2023/24:1472 — Löpande och transparent redovisning av korruptionsärenden vid svenska utrikesmyndigheter av Markus Wiechel och Alexander Christiansson (båda SD)
- Motion 2023/24:1473 — Förtroendevaldas närvaro och arvodessystemet av Markus Wiechel och Alexander Christiansson (båda SD)
- Motion 2023/24:160 — Kristendomen formaliserad i regeringsformen av Erik Hellsborn (SD)
- Motion 2023/24:1702 — Demokratiskt val av statschef av Teresa Carvalho m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2023/24:1791 — Avskaffande av anonyma partibidrag av Niels Paarup-Petersen (C)
- Motion 2023/24:1793 — Öppenhet kring lokala partiers finansiering av Rickard Nordin (C)
- Motion 2023/24:1963 — Anmälningsplikt för medlemskap i ordenssällskap och hemliga sällskap av Tomas Kronståhl m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2023/24:2007 — Reglering av pr-byråer och lobbyister av Peter Hultqvist m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2023/24:2108 — Ändamålsenlig grundlag av Jesper Skalberg Karlsson och Johan Hultberg (båda M)
- Motion 2023/24:2374 — Grundlagsskydd för public service av Magnus Manhammar (S)
Source: The Swedish Parliament