2025-02-272024/25:TU7 · p.1TUTransport & infrastructure

The establishment of Svevia and Infranord

The creation of Svevia and Infranord and the governance of road and rail maintenance

What's at stake: Svevia and Infranord were spun out of the agencies' own production and today carry out much of Sweden's road and rail maintenance. If ownership governance fails to secure productivity and target fulfilment, the quality and cost of maintenance suffer, which in turn affects travellers, freight transport and taxpayers.

Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.

What the vote decides

The question is whether the government's current ownership governance of Svevia and Infranord is sufficient, or whether the state should take back more control of road and rail maintenance and an inquiry into returning to state organisation should be launched.

Yes Yes — the committee proposal

The committee welcomes the review but shares the government's assessments: the companies have return targets that steer them towards higher productivity, they are governed under the same model as other state-owned companies, and owner dialogues have clarified procedures and serve as a tool for following up the financial targets and demanding an action plan if targets are missed. No requirement to bring maintenance back in-house is therefore needed.

No No — the reservations

Reservation 1 (S)

The Social Democrats want the state to take back more control of rail and road maintenance and an inquiry into returning to state organisation, since according to the review the ownership governance does not ensure that parliament's intentions with the corporatisation are met.

Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.

VSMPCLKDMSD
YesNoAbstainAbsent

What do the votes mean here?

Yes The committee proposal: closing the file on the government's report (no further action) and rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).

No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 1 by S.

Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.

What each plan points to — and how the party voted

For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.

PlanVoteConfidenceEvidence
VNoAbstain 0/0/19/5departs from the planconfidence: highexplicit
Sown reservationNoNo 0/93/0/13follows the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
MPNoAbstain 0/0/14/4departs from the planconfidence: highexplicit
CYesAbstain 0/0/20/4departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
LYesYes 12/0/0/4follows the planconfidence: mediumderived
KDYesYes 14/0/0/5follows the planconfidence: mediumderived
MYesYes 60/0/0/8follows the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
SDNoYes 62/0/0/10departs from the planconfidence: mediumderived

Committee proposal

The Riksdag rejects the motions 2024/25:3288 by Malin Östh et al. (V), 2024/25:3290 by Gunilla Svantorp et al. (S) demands 1-3, 2024/25:3292 by Linus Lakso et al. (MP) and 2024/25:3294 by Ulrika Heie et al. (C) demands 1 and 2, and lays letter 2024/25:35 to file.

Original (Swedish)

Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2024/25:3288 av Malin Östh m.fl. (V), 2024/25:3290 av Gunilla Svantorp m.fl. (S) yrkandena 1-3, 2024/25:3292 av Linus Lakso m.fl. (MP) och 2024/25:3294 av Ulrika Heie m.fl. (C) yrkandena 1 och 2 samt lägger skrivelse 2024/25:35 till handlingarna.

Riksdag decision: The Riksdag has considered a letter from the government concerning the National Audit Office's report on the establishment of the state infrastructure companies Svevia and Infranord. The National Audit Office makes several recommendations to the government, including that they should systematically follow up and evaluate Svevia's and Infranord's measures to achieve their financial targets. The government states in its letter that it can follow the companies' goal achievement through existing owner dialogues, and that the owner can demand an action plan if the targets are not met. The government also states that it will not take any other measures in connection with the National Audit Office's findings and that the report is thus considered concluded. The Riksdag laid the letter to file, that is, concluded the matter.

Counter-proposals

Plan vs actual vote

Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.

VVänsterpartietNoAbstaindeparts from the planexplicit

The election manifesto establishes that it is high time to take back the socially important activities and infrastructure that have been privatized and that the state must increase its control over infrastructure.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The election manifesto establishes that it is high time to take back the socially important activities and infrastructure that have been privatized and that the state must increase its control over infrastructure. The party programme wants to strongly strengthen common ownership in key sectors such as infrastructure, because decisions there need to weigh long-term socioeconomic goals rather than return requirements. An inquiry into returning to state organization for road and rail maintenance is exactly what the plan requires.

Original (Swedish)

Valmanifestet slår fast att det är hög tid att ta tillbaka den samhällsviktiga verksamhet och infrastruktur som privatiserats och att staten måste öka sin kontroll över infrastrukturen. Partiprogrammet vill kraftigt stärka det gemensamma ägandet i nyckelsektorer som infrastruktur, eftersom besluten där behöver väga in långsiktiga samhällsekonomiska mål snarare än avkastningskrav. En utredning om återgång till statlig organisation för väg- och järnvägsunderhåll är precis det planen kräver.

  • reclaim privatized infrastructuredecisive»Det är hög tid att agera och ta tillbaka den samhällsviktiga verksamhet och infrastruktur som har privatiserats.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It is high time to act and take back the socially important activities and infrastructure that have been privatized.”
  • increased state control over infrastructure»Staten måste öka sin kontroll över infrastruktur och resurser som behövs för att genomföra klimatomställningen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The state must increase its control over infrastructure and resources needed to implement the climate transition.”
  • common ownership in key sectors»I nyckelsektorer som finans, infrastruktur, bostäder och energiförsörjning vill« (party programme ↗)“In key sectors such as finance, infrastructure, housing and energy supply want”
  • upgraded road and rail networks»Vägnätet och järnvägen behöver rustas upp i stora delar av Sverige, när industrierna nu expanderar på nya platser.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Road networks and railways need to be upgraded in large parts of Sweden, as industries now expand in new places.”

The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.

SSocialdemokraternaNoNofollows the plannot addressed

The plan's basic stance is that society shall advance positions and take back control of socially important activities, and the party programme gives democracy priority over the market with the requirement to test in each situation which operational form gives best results.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan's basic stance is that society shall advance positions and take back control of socially important activities, and the party programme gives democracy priority over the market with the requirement to test in each situation which operational form gives best results. An investigation into return to state organisation of road and rail maintenance is precisely such a test. Moreover, the plan's massive rail investments presuppose maintenance that functions.

Original (Swedish)

Planens grundhållning är att samhället ska flytta fram positionerna och ta tillbaka kontrollen över samhällsviktig verksamhet, och partiprogrammet ger demokratin företräde före marknaden med kravet att i varje situation pröva vilken driftsform som ger bäst resultat. En utredning om återgång till statlig organisation av väg- och järnvägsunderhållet är just en sådan prövning. Planens massiva järnvägssatsningar förutsätter dessutom ett underhåll som fungerar.

  • take back democratic controldecisive»Samhället ska flytta fram positionerna för att ta tillbaka kontrollen över utvecklingen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Society shall advance positions to take back control of development.”
  • priority of democracy»Demokratin har därför företräde före marknaden.« (party programme ↗)“Democracy therefore has priority over the market.”
  • test operational form against results»måste vara att i varje situation pröva vilken form som ger det bästa resultatet med hänsyn« (party programme ↗)“must be to test in each situation which form gives the best result with consideration”
  • investments in rail»Genom massiva investeringar i både ny och befintlig järnväg kommer fler att kunna resa klimatsmart med tåg.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Through massive investments in both new and existing rail, more people will be able to travel climate-smartly by rail.”
MPMiljöpartietNoAbstaindeparts from the planexplicit

The plan explicitly states that the rail system needs to be reviewed and to some degree re-regulated for the transport system to function long-term, and that society itself must control and pay for infrastructure systems.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan explicitly states that the rail system needs to be reviewed and to some degree re-regulated for the transport system to function long-term, and that society itself must control and pay for infrastructure systems. The counter-proposal's requirement that the state takes back control of road and rail maintenance and that a return is examined is therefore what the plan advocates. The plan accepts state ownership of business operations when there is reason for it.

Original (Swedish)

Planen säger uttryckligen att järnvägssystemet behöver ses över och till vissa delar återregleras för att transportsystemet ska fungera långsiktigt, och att samhället självt måste styra och stå för infrastruktursystemen. Motförslagets krav på att staten återtar kontrollen över väg- och järnvägsunderhållet och att en återgång utreds är därmed vad planen förordar. Planen godtar statligt ägande av affärsverksamhet när det finns skäl för det.

  • re-regulate railwaysdecisive»Järnvägssystemet behöver ses över och till vissa delar återregleras för att få ett optimalt och långsiktigt fungerande transportsystem.« (party programme ↗)“The rail system needs to be reviewed and to some degree re-regulated to get an optimal and long-term functioning transport system.”
  • society controls infrastructure»Samhället måste själv styra och stå för utbyggnad av infrastruktursystemen.« (party programme ↗)“Society must itself control and pay for expansion of infrastructure systems.”
  • reliable track maintenance»Man ska kunna lita på järnvägen. Därför måste spåren underhållas och förseningar minimeras.« (party programme ↗)“You should be able to rely on the railways. Therefore, the tracks must be maintained and delays minimized.”
  • state ownership can be justified»I vissa fall kan det dock finnas skäl för staten eller en kommun att äga och driva affärsverksamheter.« (party programme ↗)“In some cases, there may, however, be reason for the state or a municipality to own and operate business operations.”

The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.

CCenterpartietYesAbstaindeparts from the plannot addressed

The party programme establishes that the market economy shall be free from planned economy steering and that public activities can advantageously be put out to competitive tender.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The party programme establishes that the market economy shall be free from planned economy steering and that public activities can advantageously be put out to competitive tender. A re-nationalization of road and railway maintenance goes in the opposite direction. The plan wishes instead to upgrade railways, that is, to raise maintenance quality, but not by taking the activity back into state management.

Original (Swedish)

Partiprogrammet slår fast att marknadsekonomin ska vara fri från planekonomiska pekpinnar och att offentlig verksamhet med fördel kan konkurrensutsättas. Ett återförstatligande av väg- och järnvägsunderhållet går i motsatt riktning. Planen vill däremot rusta upp järnvägarna, alltså höja underhållets kvalitet, men inte genom att återta verksamheten i statlig regi.

  • competitive tendering of public activitiesdecisive»Offentlig verksamhet kan med fördel konkurrensutsättas för att ge det privata näringslivet möjlighet att skapa« (party programme ↗)“Public activities can advantageously be put out to competitive tender to give the private business sector the opportunity to create”
  • upgraded railways»Vi vill rusta upp regionala järnvägar, bygga nya stambanor från norr till söder, höja standarden på det nationella stambanenätet i hela landet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We wish to upgrade regional railways, build new main trunk lines from north to south, raise the standard of the national trunk line network across the country”
  • predictable rules»Ekonomin ska ha givna och förutsägbara spelregler, som« (party programme ↗)“The economy shall have given and predictable rules, as”

flags: citat_blockerat

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

LLiberalernaYesYesfollows the planderived

The plan establishes that the public sector shall only conduct business when there is a strong societal interest and shall not conduct activities that crowd out functioning private alternatives.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan establishes that the public sector shall only conduct business when there is a strong societal interest and shall not conduct activities that crowd out functioning private alternatives. To bring back road and rail maintenance into state organisation goes in the opposite direction. The plan instead wants procurement to stimulate competition and the rail network to be upgraded, not for the market to be abolished.

Original (Swedish)

Planen slår fast att det offentliga endast ska driva affärsverksamhet när det finns ett starkt samhällsintresse och inte ska driva verksamheter som tränger ut fungerande privata alternativ. Att återta väg- och järnvägsunderhållet i statlig organisation går i motsatt riktning. Planen vill i stället att upphandling stimulerar konkurrens och att järnvägsnätet rustas upp, inte att marknaden avskaffas.

  • limited public businessdecisive»Det offentliga ska endast driva affärsverksamhet om det finns ett starkt samhällsintresse.« (party programme ↗)“The public sector shall only conduct business if there is a strong societal interest.”
  • no crowding out of private alternatives»Det offentliga ska inte driva verksamheter som tränger ut fungerande privata alternativ eller försvårar nyföretagande.« (party programme ↗)“The public sector shall not conduct activities that crowd out functioning private alternatives or make it harder to start new businesses.”
  • procurement that stimulates competition»Offentlig upphandling ska ske på sätt som ger skattebetalarna låga kostnader, hög kvalitet, säkrar likabehandling och stimulerar konkurrens.« (party programme ↗)“Public procurement shall be conducted in ways that give taxpayers low costs, high quality, secures equal treatment and stimulates competition.”
  • upgraded rail and road network»Järnvägsnätet för gods- och persontransporter är i starkt behov av upprustning och utbyggnad, liksom vissa delar av vägnätet.« (party programme ↗)“The rail network for freight and passenger transport is in great need of upgrading and expansion, as are certain parts of the road network.”
KDKristdemokraternaYesYesfollows the planderived

The plan establishes that public activity shall, as far as possible, be based on the absence of monopolies, that activity which is not the exercise of state authority should be procured through competition, and that actual traffic shall be conducted in competition whilst the public sector is responsible for the infrastructure.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan establishes that public activity shall, as far as possible, be based on the absence of monopolies, that activity which is not the exercise of state authority should be procured through competition, and that actual traffic shall be conducted in competition whilst the public sector is responsible for the infrastructure. An investigation into taking back road and rail maintenance in state organization runs counter to that line. The plan, however, gives support to the requirement for evaluation and cost monitoring of the companies' activities.

Original (Swedish)

Planen slår fast att offentlig verksamhet så långt möjligt ska bygga på frånvaro av monopol, att verksamhet som inte är myndighetsutövning bör upphandlas i konkurrens och att själva trafiken bör bedrivas i konkurrens medan det offentliga svarar för infrastrukturen. En utredning om att återta väg- och järnvägsunderhållet i statlig organisation går emot den linjen. Planen ger däremot stöd för kravet på utvärdering och kostnadsuppföljning av bolagens verksamhet.

  • absence of monopoliesdecisive»verksamhetsformer ska så långt möjligt bygga på frånvaro av monopol.« (party programme ↗)“activity forms shall, as far as possible, be based on the absence of monopolies.”
  • procurement in competition»Övrig offentlig verksamhet, som inte är myndighetsutövning, bör« (party programme ↗)“Other public activity, which is not the exercise of state authority, should”
  • traffic in competition»Själva trafiken bör bedrivas i konkurrens.« (party programme ↗)“Traffic itself should be conducted in competition.”
  • monitoring and evaluation»Utvärdering, kostnadsuppföljning och kvalitetskontroll är därför viktiga politiska« (party programme ↗)“Evaluation, cost monitoring and quality control are therefore important political”
MModeraternaYesYesfollows the plannot addressed

The plan's guiding principle is that what can be done equally well or better by someone else should not be carried out by the public sector and that a large state gives a weaker society; the plan also wants to reduce state ownership.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan's guiding principle is that what can be done equally well or better by someone else should not be carried out by the public sector and that a large state gives a weaker society; the plan also wants to reduce state ownership. The state taking back road and rail maintenance in its own organization goes directly against this. The plan's transport commitment is to upgrade existing railways and repair roads, not to nationalize the operations. The demand is rejected.

Original (Swedish)

Planens bärande princip är att det som kan göras lika bra eller bättre av någon annan inte ska utföras av det offentliga och att en stor stat ger ett svagare samhälle; planen vill dessutom minska statligt ägande. Att staten återtar väg- och järnvägsunderhållet i egen organisation går rakt emot detta. Planens transportåtagande är att rusta upp befintlig järnväg och laga vägarna, inte att förstatliga utförandet. Kravet avvisas.

  • private before public executiondecisive»Om något kan göras lika bra eller bättre av« (party programme ↗)“If something can be done equally well or better by”
  • limited state»En stor stat leder till ett svagare samhälle.« (party programme ↗)“A large state leads to a weaker society.”
  • reduced state ownership»Sälja av en större andel av statliga Sveaskogs innehav till personer med regional anknytning« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sell a larger share of the state-owned Sveaskog holdings to people with regional connections”
  • maintenance before new construction»Rusta upp dagens järnväg i stället för att satsa på höghastighetståg som riskerar att vara omoderna redan innan de är klara« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Upgrade today's railway instead of investing in high-speed trains that risk being outdated before they are finished”
SDSverigedemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The party programme states that essential parts of the infrastructure should be under state control and that the state and municipality must retain significant influence over the infrastructure.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The party programme states that essential parts of the infrastructure should be under state control and that the state and municipality must retain significant influence over the infrastructure. The election manifesto makes improved maintenance of roads and railways a commitment, which is precisely what the review calls into question. An investigation into a return to state organisation is therefore in line with the plan, although the party programme is otherwise pragmatic about operational form.

Original (Swedish)

Partiprogrammet slår fast att väsentliga delar av infrastrukturen bör stå under statlig kontroll och att stat och kommun måste behålla ett betydande mått av inflytande över infrastrukturen. Valmanifestet gör förbättrat underhåll av vägar och järnväg till ett åtagande, vilket är just vad granskningen sätter i fråga. En utredning om återgång till statlig organisation ligger därför i linje med planen, även om partiprogrammet i övrigt är pragmatiskt om driftsformen.

  • infrastructure under state controldecisive»försvar och väsentliga delar av vår infrastruktur bör stå under statlig kontroll« (party programme ↗)“defence and essential parts of our infrastructure should be under state control”
  • public influence over infrastructure»behålla ett betydande mått av inflytande över infrastruktur och kollektivtrafik« (party programme ↗)“retain significant influence over infrastructure and public transport”
  • better maintenance»Förbättra underhållet av vägar och järnväg« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Improve the maintenance of roads and railways”
  • pragmatic operational form»inte vem som utför en specifik uppgift« (party programme ↗)“not who performs a specific task”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

Share and embed

Embed as a widget (iframe): previewSizeLanguage

Sources and documents

Documents under consideration

Source: The Swedish Parliament