2024-04-032023/24:UU15 · p.4UUForeign affairs

The Israeli-Palestinian conflict

The war in Gaza and the demand for an immediate ceasefire

What's at stake: The stance shapes Sweden's official position on the Gaza war and affects civilians in Gaza and Israel, hostages held by Hamas, and how Sweden acts in the UN and international courts.

Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.

What the vote decides

The question is whether Sweden should demand an immediate, permanent and unconditional ceasefire in Gaza and back international legal proceedings against Israel, or maintain a position that ties ceasefire support to the release of hostages and to Israel's right to self-defence.

Yes Yes — the committee proposal

The Committee on Foreign Affairs condemns Hamas's terrorist attack on Israel and demands the immediate, unconditional release of all hostages. It backs calls for an immediate humanitarian ceasefire and unhindered humanitarian access to Gaza, and notes that Sweden has voted for UN ceasefire resolutions, while also affirming Israel's right to defend itself against Hamas. The committee therefore sees no need to adopt the motions.

No No — the reservations

Reservation 6 (V, MP)

The Left Party and the Green Party want Sweden to demand an immediate, unconditional and permanent ceasefire in Gaza, condemn Israel's bombing and blockade that have killed tens of thousands, back South Africa's genocide case against Israel at the International Court of Justice, and work to end Israel's occupation so Palestinians can live freely.

Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.

VSMPCLKDMSD
YesNoAbstainAbsent

What do the votes mean here?

Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).

No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 6 by V, MP.

Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.

What each plan points to — and how the party voted

For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.

PlanVoteConfidenceEvidence
Vown reservationNoNo 0/21/0/3follows the planconfidence: highderived
SNoAbstain 0/0/92/14departs from the planconfidence: mediumderived
MPown reservationNoNo 0/14/0/4follows the planconfidence: highderived
CNoYes 21/0/0/3departs from the planconfidence: lownot addressed
LYesYes 14/0/0/2follows the planconfidence: lownot addressed
KDYesYes 15/0/0/4follows the planconfidence: mediumderived
MYesYes 60/0/0/8follows the planconfidence: lownot addressed
SDYesYes 63/0/0/9follows the planconfidence: highderived

Committee proposal

The Riksdag rejects the motions 2023/24:462 by Håkan Svenneling et al. (V) points 16-18, 2023/24:989 by Lorena Delgado Varas et al. (V) point 13 and 2023/24:2659 by Jamal El-Haj et al. (S) points 1-3.

Original (Swedish)

Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2023/24:462 av Håkan Svenneling m.fl. (V) yrkandena 16-18, 2023/24:989 av Lorena Delgado Varas m.fl. (V) yrkande 13 och 2023/24:2659 av Jamal El-Haj m.fl. (S) yrkandena 1-3.

Riksdag decision: The Riksdag rejected approximately 80 proposals in motions regarding the Middle East and North Africa that were submitted during the general motions period 2023. The Riksdag's assessments and positions are based on the current situation in the regions and on the information available at present.

Counter-proposals

Plan vs actual vote

Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.

VVänsterpartietNoNofollows the planderived

The election manifesto states that Sweden must be a voice for peace and justice, not for increased militarization, and that development aid and the UN must be strengthened.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The election manifesto states that Sweden must be a voice for peace and justice, not for increased militarization, and that development aid and the UN must be strengthened. The party programme makes international law and respect for human rights the foundation for an independent foreign policy that dares to challenge great powers. The counter-proposal's demands for immediate ceasefire, free humanitarian access, legal prosecution of international law violations and an end to occupation directly follow from these commitments.

Original (Swedish)

Valplattformen slår fast att Sverige ska vara en röst för fred och rättvisa, inte för ökad militarisering, och att biståndet och FN ska stärkas. Partiprogrammet gör folkrätten och respekten för de mänskliga rättigheterna till grund för en självständig utrikespolitik som vågar utmana stormakter. Motförslagets krav på omedelbart eldupphör, fri humanitär tillgång, rättslig prövning av folkrättsbrott och ett slut på ockupationen följer direkt av dessa åtaganden.

  • Sweden as a voice for peacedecisive»Vänsterpartiet anser att Sverige ska vara en röst för fred och rättvisa, inte för ökad militarisering.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Left Party believes that Sweden must be a voice for peace and justice, not for increased militarization.”
  • international law guides foreign policy»Sverige ska föra en självständig utrikespolitik där demokrati, respekt för folkrätten« (party programme ↗)“Sweden must pursue an independent foreign policy where democracy, respect for international law”
  • human rights fundamental»Respekten för de mänskliga rättigheterna ska vara grundläggande« (party programme ↗)“Respect for human rights must be fundamental”
  • strengthen UN and development aid»Sverige ska öka biståndet, stärka FN och skriva under kärnvapenkonventionen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden must increase development aid, strengthen the UN and sign the nuclear weapons convention.”
SSocialdemokraternaNoAbstaindeparts from the planderived

The plan builds foreign policy on international law and the UN's role and requires that every person's right to life in freedom and security always be defended and that the world community react to serious threats to population groups.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan builds foreign policy on international law and the UN's role and requires that every person's right to life in freedom and security always be defended and that the world community react to serious threats to population groups. An immediate ceasefire, free humanitarian access and a legal examination of the allegations are measures within that framework. The Security Council's call for immediate ceasefire now strengthens the connection to the plan's UN line.

Original (Swedish)

Planen bygger utrikespolitiken på folkrätten och FN:s roll och kräver att enskilda människors rätt till liv i frihet och säkerhet alltid försvaras samt att världssamfundet reagerar vid allvarliga hot mot befolkningsgrupper. Ett omedelbart eldupphör, fritt humanitärt tillträde och en rättslig prövning av anklagelserna är åtgärder inom den ramen. Att säkerhetsrådet nu manat till omedelbar vapenvila stärker kopplingen till planens FN-linje.

  • the UN and international lawdecisive»Vi kommer att fortsätta värna FN:s roll i arbetet för folkrätten och det internationella samarbetet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We will continue to safeguard the UN's role in work for international law and international cooperation.”
  • civilians' right to life and security»människors rätt till liv i frihet och säkerhet måste alltid försvaras« (party programme ↗)“people's right to life in freedom and security must always be defended”
  • react to threats against population groups»kunna reagera vid allvarliga hot mot befolkningsgrupper, även när hotet kommer från dem« (party programme ↗)“be able to react to serious threats to population groups, even when the threat comes from them”
  • rules-based world order»Vi kommer att fortsätta arbetet för att öka respekten för de mänskliga rättigheterna, demokratin och en regelbaserad världsordning och global säkerhet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We will continue the work to increase respect for human rights, democracy and a rules-based world order and global security.”

Worldstate weighed in: The UN Security Council has adopted a resolution on immediate ceasefire in Gaza — The plan's commitment to safeguard the UN's role for international law then points directly to the demand for immediate ceasefire.

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

MPMiljöpartietNoNofollows the planderived

The party programme places international law and human rights at the centre, wants politics to place human security ahead of territorial and accepts military violence only in self-defence or with UN mandate.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The party programme places international law and human rights at the centre, wants politics to place human security ahead of territorial and accepts military violence only in self-defence or with UN mandate. The requirements for immediate ceasefire, free humanitarian access, legal proceedings for violations of international law and an end to occupation follow from these commitments and from the fact that rights are universal.

Original (Swedish)

Partiprogrammet sätter folkrätten och de mänskliga rättigheterna i centrum, vill att politiken sätter mänsklig säkerhet före territoriell och accepterar militärt våld endast i självförsvar eller med FN-mandat. Kraven på omedelbart eldupphör, fri humanitär tillgång, rättslig prövning av folkrättsbrott och ett slut på ockupationen följer av dessa åtaganden och av att rättigheterna är universella.

  • international law and human rights at centredecisive»Miljöpartiet de gröna sätter folkrätten och de mänskliga rättigheterna i centrum.« (party programme ↗)“The Green Party places international law and human rights at the centre.”
  • human security ahead of territorial»Vi vill se en politik som sätter mänsklig säkerhet före territoriell.« (party programme ↗)“We want to see a politics that places human security ahead of territorial.”
  • violence only with UN mandate»En förutsättning är att det sker i självförsvar eller med FN-mandat.« (party programme ↗)“A prerequisite is that it occurs in self-defence or with UN mandate.”
  • universal rights»De rättigheter som vi arbetar för i vår del av världen är universella.« (party programme ↗)“The rights we work for in our part of the world are universal.”

Worldstate weighed in: The UN Security Council has adopted a resolution on immediate ceasefire in Gaza — Gives the plan's international law principle a concrete expression to support; Mass deaths among civilians in queue for aid in Gaza — Sharpens the plan's requirements on humanitarian access and human security

CCenterpartietNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan binds foreign policy to universal human rights and freedoms and makes peace and the protection of human rights a responsibility of the whole world, with the United Nations as arena.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan binds foreign policy to universal human rights and freedoms and makes peace and the protection of human rights a responsibility of the whole world, with the United Nations as arena. Demands for ceasefire, humanitarian access and international legal proceedings are applications of that line in an acute humanitarian catastrophe. The plan does not however take a position in the conflict as such, so security is low.

Original (Swedish)

Planen binder utrikespolitiken vid universella mänskliga fri- och rättigheter och gör fred och skyddet av mänskliga rättigheter till hela världens ansvar, med FN som arena. Krav på eldupphör, humanitärt tillträde och internationell rättslig prövning är tillämpningar av den linjen i en akut humanitär katastrof. Planen tar dock inte ställning i konflikten som sådan, varför säkerheten är låg.

  • global responsibility for peacedecisive»Fred, skyddet av mänskliga rättigheter och hållbar utveckling är hela världens ansvar.« (party programme ↗)“Peace, protection of human rights and sustainable development are the responsibility of the whole world.”
  • rights-based foreign policy»Utrikes- och säkerhetspolitiken syftar ytterst till att värna universella mänskliga fri- och rättigheter.« (party programme ↗)“Foreign and security policy ultimately aims to safeguard universal human rights and freedoms.”
  • Swedish support for peacekeeping»Centerpartiet vill att Sverige ska bistå i internationella fredsinsatser« (party programme ↗)“The Centre Party wishes Sweden to assist in international peacekeeping operations”
  • human rights as foundation»Respekten för de mänskliga rättigheterna är grunden för ett demokratiskt samhälle.« (party programme ↗)“Respect for human rights is the foundation of a democratic society.”

Worldstate weighed in: Catastrophic humanitarian situation in Gaza — Actualizes the plan's demands for protection of civilians and humanitarian responsibility; UN resolution on immediate ceasefire — Provides the plan's UN and international law line a concrete application

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

LLiberalernaYesYesfollows the plannot addressed

The plan does not address the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan does not address the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The nearest principle is that Sweden shall never waver in support for freedom in the world around us and that foreign policy is values-driven, which speaks against an unconditional and permanent ceasefire that makes no demands on the terrorist organisation. The plan's support for a strengthened international criminal court speaks instead for the legal process the counter-proposal wants to see, but does not carry the requirement as a whole.

Original (Swedish)

Planen behandlar inte den israelisk-palestinska konflikten. Närmast liggande princip är att Sverige aldrig ska svikta i stödet för friheten i omvärlden och att utrikespolitiken är värderingsstyrd, vilket talar emot ett villkorslöst och permanent eldupphör som inte ställer några krav på terrorrörelsen. Planens stöd för en stärkt internationell brottmålsdomstol talar däremot för den rättsliga prövning som motförslaget vill se, men bär inte kravet som helhet.

  • support for freedom in the worlddecisive»Sverige aldrig ska svikta i stödet för friheten i vår omvärld« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden shall never waver in support for freedom in the world around us”
  • values-driven foreign policy»Målet med vår utrikespolitik är en friare värld för alla.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The goal of our foreign policy is a freer world for all.”
  • strengthened criminal court»Internationella brottmålsdomstolens roll för att lagföra brott mot mänskliga rättigheter ska stärkas.« (party programme ↗)“The role of the International Criminal Court in prosecuting crimes against human rights shall be strengthened.”
KDKristdemokraternaYesYesfollows the planderived

The party programme explicitly recognizes the right to defend oneself against attack and that self-defence is a justified purpose for force.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The party programme explicitly recognizes the right to defend oneself against attack and that self-defence is a justified purpose for force. A demand for immediate and permanent ceasefire without conditions takes away precisely that right and places no demands on the attacking party. The programme supports instead that civilians are protected and that international courts are strengthened, which qualifies but does not reverse the conclusion.

Original (Swedish)

Principprogrammet erkänner uttryckligen rätten att försvara sig mot angrepp och att självförsvar är ett rättfärdigt ändamål för vapenmakt. Ett krav på omedelbart och permanent eldupphör utan villkor tar bort just den rätten och ställer inga krav på den angripande parten. Programmet stöder däremot att civila skyddas och att internationella domstolar stärks, vilket kvalificerar men inte vänder slutsatsen.

  • the right to self-defencedecisive»Rätten till liv, kroppslig integritet och respekt för den personliga värdigheten innefattar även rätten att försvara sig mot angrepp.« (party programme ↗)“The right to life, bodily integrity and respect for personal dignity also includes the right to defend oneself against attack.”
  • criteria for defensive war»Om det är ett försvarskrig måste det föreligga ett rättfärdigt ändamål, det vill säga självförsvar, skydda oskyldigas liv eller säkrande av grundläggande mänskliga rättigheter.« (party programme ↗)“If it is a defensive war, there must be a justified purpose, that is self-defence, to protect innocent lives or to secure fundamental human rights.”
  • protection of civilians»Aggression riktad mot civila är ej försvarbar.« (party programme ↗)“Aggression directed at civilians is not defensible.”
  • strengthened international courts»Därför måste FN:s ställning skyddas och stärkas, liksom olika internationella domstolar och rättssystem inom FN-systemet.« (party programme ↗)“Therefore the UN's position must be protected and strengthened, as well as various international courts and legal systems within the UN system.”

Worldstate weighed in: The UN Security Council adopts a resolution on immediate ceasefire in Gaza — Reinforces the plan's commitment to the UN's position, but does not change the requirement to respect the right to self-defence

MModeraternaYesYesfollows the plannot addressed

The plan does not address the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan does not address the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The principle that comes closest is that tolerance never extends to those who use violence or threats of violence, and that Sweden should wholeheartedly support those subjected to armed attack. An unconditional and permanent ceasefire without corresponding demands on the attacking party, linked to genocide allegations, lacks support in the plan, although its commitment to humanitarian aid speaks in favour of humanitarian access.

Original (Swedish)

Planen behandlar inte den israelisk-palestinska konflikten. Den princip som ligger närmast är att toleransen aldrig sträcks till den som använder våld eller hot om våld, och att Sverige helhjärtat ska stå upp för den som utsätts för väpnat angrepp. Ett villkorslöst och permanent eldupphör utan motsvarande krav på den angripande parten, kopplat till folkmordsanklagelser, saknar stöd i planen, även om dess åtagande om humanitärt bistånd talar för humanitärt tillträde.

  • no tolerance for violencedecisive»Den tolererar inte uppmaningar till hat- eller våldsbrott.« (party programme ↗)“It does not tolerate incitement to hate or violent crime.”
  • support for the attacked party»Sverige ska helhjärtat stå upp för Ukraina, även med fortsatta vapenleveranser.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden should wholeheartedly support Ukraine, even with continued arms deliveries.”
  • increased humanitarian aid»Öka andelen humanitärt bistånd i den svenska biståndsbudgeten« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Increase the share of humanitarian aid in the Swedish aid budget”
  • democracy and human rights»Prioritera insatser som stödjer arbetet för demokrati och mänskliga rättigheter« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Prioritize initiatives that support work for democracy and human rights”

Worldstate weighed in: The UN Security Council adopts a resolution on an immediate ceasefire in Gaza — Strengthens the humanitarian ceasefire requirement, but the plan still does not support unconditional terms or genocide prosecution.

SDSverigedemokraternaYesYesfollows the planderived

The plan states that the relationship with Israel, as the only democracy in its region, should be re-established and cared for, and that international terrorism and Islamism should be combated.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan states that the relationship with Israel, as the only democracy in its region, should be re-established and cared for, and that international terrorism and Islamism should be combated. The counter-proposal's requirements for an unconditional permanent ceasefire, condemnation of Israel's military operations and Swedish support for a genocide inquiry conflict with that line. The plan also sees Islamist influence in the region as a threat to Sweden.

Original (Swedish)

Planen slår fast att relationen till Israel, som den enda demokratin i sin region, ska återupprättas och vårdas, och att internationell terrorism och islamism ska bekämpas. Motförslagets krav på villkorslöst permanent eldupphör, fördömande av Israels krigföring och svenskt stöd för en folkmordsprövning står i strid med den linjen. Planen ser dessutom det islamistiska inflytandet i regionen som ett hot mot Sverige.

  • care for the relationship with Israeldecisive»Relationen till Israel, som den enda demokratin i sin region, bör återupprättas och vårdas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The relationship with Israel, as the only democracy in its region, should be re-established and cared for.”
  • combat terrorism and Islamism»Bekämpa internationell terrorism och islamism« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Combat international terrorism and Islamism”
  • Islamism as a security threat»Ett allt mer aggressivt islamistiskt inflytande i mellanöstern och Afrika innebär att risken för terrorism ökar i Sverige och att mänskliga rättigheter och respekten för kvinnor trycks tillbaka i världen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Increasingly aggressive Islamist influence in the Middle East and Africa means that the risk of terrorism in Sweden increases and that human rights and respect for women are pushed back in the world.”
  • mark against territorial violations»Sverige ska tydligt markera mot kränkningar av grundläggande fri- och rättigheter och av suveräna staters territorium.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden should clearly mark against violations of basic freedoms and rights and of sovereign states' territory.”

Share and embed

Embed as a widget (iframe): previewSizeLanguage

Sources and documents

Documents under consideration

Source: The Swedish Parliament