2025-05-222024/25:MJU19 · p.15MJUEnvironment & agriculture
Distribution of fishing opportunities and transferable fishing rights
Allocation of fishing opportunities and transferable fishing rights
What's at stake: The current system of individually transferable fishing quotas (ITQ) is said by critics to favour large vessels and make it harder for small-scale coastal fishers to make a living, while single-species catch permits can be difficult to reconcile with the Baltic Sea's sensitive ecosystems. The issue affects both the environmental impact of fishing and the livelihoods of commercial fishers, including the younger fishers who will need to take over the industry.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The reservation wanted the government to task the Swedish Agency for Marine and Water Management with reviewing the system for allocating fishing quotas so that commercial fishing could be more ecosystem-adapted and less concentrated among a few large vessels, while the committee held that ongoing work on competitiveness and profitability within the fishing industry already addresses these needs.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee rejects the motions, pointing out that the Swedish food strategy and the joint strategy of the Swedish Agency for Marine and Water Management and the Swedish Board of Agriculture already aim at increased competitiveness, profitability and social value within the blue industries, with specific follow-up on small-scale coastal fishing, and that any measures must not create an unreasonable administrative burden for the industry.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 27 (V)
The reservation (V) argues that the current system of individually transferable fishing quotas (ITQ) is not sustainable in the long run because quotas become concentrated among a few large vessels, and wants the government to task the Swedish Agency for Marine and Water Management with reviewing quota allocation so that commercial fishing can be ecosystem-adapted, with a plan to compensate small-scale fishers when quota allocations change quickly.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 27 by V.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have held
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: LLiberalerna
Ja 194–18Ja 183–29
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | No 0/18/0/6 | match | confidence: high | derived |
| S | No | Yes 89/0/0/17 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| MP | No | Abstain 0/0/14/4 | differs | confidence: high | explicit |
| C | No | Yes 20/0/1/3 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
| L | No | Yes 11/0/0/5 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: medium | explicit |
| KD | No | Yes 15/0/0/4 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
| M | No | Yes 58/0/0/10 | differs | confidence: low | derived |
| SD | No | Abstain 0/0/63/9 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
Broke with the party line
| CJonny Cato (C, Skåne läns västra) | Abstain — party line: Yes |
MPs whose vote differs from their party's majority position in this division. Marked with a dark ring in the chamber view.
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2024/25:1369 by Martin Kinnunen et al. (SD) points 11, 13, 14 and 28, 2024/25:1928 by Andrea Andersson Tay et al. (V) points 1 and 2, 2024/25:2803 by Sten Bergheden (M) and 2024/25:3037 by Daniel Helldén et al. (MP) point 80.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2024/25:1369 av Martin Kinnunen m.fl. (SD) yrkandena 11, 13, 14 och 28, 2024/25:1928 av Andrea Andersson Tay m.fl. (V) yrkandena 1 och 2, 2024/25:2803 av Sten Bergheden (M) och 2024/25:3037 av Daniel Helldén m.fl. (MP) yrkande 80.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag rejected approximately 100 proposals on fishing policy in motions from the general motion period 2024. The Riksdag refers primarily to the fact that work is already underway in the matters the proposals address. The proposals concern, among other things, sustainable fish stocks, measures to protect Swedish fisheries, supervision and sanctions.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants specific guidance from ICES on herring spawning stocks and to limit transfers of fishing rights between years. (V) — Reservation 27
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan points out the unsustainable development where ever more capital concentrates in ever fewer hands and wants more of the value of natural resources to remain where they are produced, with greater common ownership of natural resources.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan points out the unsustainable development where ever more capital concentrates in ever fewer hands and wants more of the value of natural resources to remain where they are produced, with greater common ownership of natural resources. That the system of individually transferable quotas is reviewed, because the quotas accumulate with a few large vessels, and that small-scale fishers are compensated follows directly from that. Ecosystem-adapted fishing is also the plan's line.
Original (Swedish)
Planen pekar ut den ohållbara utvecklingen där alltmer kapital koncentreras på allt färre händer och vill att mer av naturresursernas värden stannar där de produceras, med ett större gemensamt ägande av naturtillgångar. Att systemet med individuellt överförbara kvoter ses över, eftersom kvoterna samlas hos ett fåtal stora båtar, och att småskaliga fiskare kompenseras följer direkt av det. Ekosystemanpassat fiske är också planens linje.
- capital concentration is unsustainabledecisive»Vi har länge sett en ohållbar utveckling där alltmer kapital« (party programme ↗)“We have long seen an unsustainable development where ever more capital”
- value remains locally»Mer av naturresursernas värden måste stanna kvar där de utvinns och produceras.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“More of the value of natural resources must remain where they are extracted and produced.”
- common ownership of natural resources»Vi vill gå mot ett större gemensamt ägande av gruvbrytningen i« (party programme ↗)“We want to move toward greater common ownership of mining in”
- ecosystem considerations»skapa goda villkor för rika ekosystem, bland annat genom att återställa« (party programme ↗)“create good conditions for rich ecosystems, among other things by restoring”
The party programme demands effective competition law that counters monopolies and concentration and establishes that ecosystems are used beyond sustainability limits.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme demands effective competition law that counters monopolies and concentration and establishes that ecosystems are used beyond sustainability limits. That quotas are concentrated with a few large boats is precisely such a concentration, and a review of quota distribution with compensation to small-scale fishers follows from the principles of development for the whole country and a restructured fisheries policy. The plan therefore supports the counter-proposal's demand.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet kräver en effektiv konkurrenslagstiftning som motverkar monopol och koncentration och slår fast att ekosystemen utnyttjas över hållbarhetsgränsen. Att kvoterna samlas hos ett fåtal stora båtar är just en sådan koncentration, och en översyn av kvotfördelningen med kompensation till småskaliga fiskare följer av principerna om hela landets utveckling och en omlagd fiskeripolitik. Planen stöder därför motförslagets krav.
- counter concentrationdecisive»konkurrenslagstiftning ska motverka monopol och koncentration.« (party programme ↗)“competition law shall counter monopolies and concentration.”
- ecosystems' limits»naturtillgångar och ekosystem utnyttjas i dag över gränsen för det långsiktigt hållbara, och« (party programme ↗)“natural resources and ecosystems are used today beyond the limit for what is long-term sustainable, and”
- restructured fisheries policy»också en omläggning av jordbruks- och fiskeripolitiken. Konsumentperspektivet, inte« (party programme ↗)“also a restructuring of agricultural and fisheries policy. The consumer perspective, not”
- the whole country must live»Alla har ett gemensamt intresse av att hela landet kan leva och utvecklas.« (party programme ↗)“All have a common interest in the whole country being able to live and develop.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The party programme states that fishing rights shall be distributed according to sustainability criteria and that strict requirements shall be placed on the enterprises that are permitted to exploit the common fishing resource.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme states that fishing rights shall be distributed according to sustainability criteria and that strict requirements shall be placed on the enterprises that are permitted to exploit the common fishing resource. The election manifesto wants the ecosystems to set the boundaries and for fishing to become sustainable. A review of quota distribution that prevents concentration to a few large boats follows directly from this.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet slår fast att fiskerätter ska fördelas utifrån hållbarhetskriterier och att hårda krav ska ställas på de företag som får utnyttja den gemensamma fiskresursen. Valmanifestet vill att ekosystemen sätter gränserna och att fisket blir skonsamt. En översyn av kvotfördelningen som motverkar koncentration till ett fåtal stora båtar följer direkt av detta.
- sustainability guides quota distributiondecisive»Fiskerätter ska fördelas utifrån hållbarhetskriterier.« (party programme ↗)“Fishing rights shall be distributed according to sustainability criteria.”
- ecosystem-adapted fishing»låt ekosystemen i haven sätta gränserna för hur mycket fisk som får fångas, inför en ekosystembaserad havsförvaltning och gå över till skonsamma fiskemetoder.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“let the ecosystems in the seas set the boundaries for how much fish may be caught, introduce an ecosystem-based marine management and switch to sustainable fishing methods.”
- requirements on quota holders»Hårda krav ska ställas på de företag som får utnyttja den gemensamma fiskresursen för kommersiell vinning.« (party programme ↗)“Strict requirements shall be placed on the enterprises that are permitted to exploit the common fishing resource for commercial profit.”
- protect small-scale fishing»Det kustnära fisket och fritidsfisket har en viktig roll både för människors rekreation och för att våra skärgårdar ska hållas levande.« (party programme ↗)“Coastal fishing and recreational fishing have an important role both for people's recreation and for our archipelagos to remain lively.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The election manifesto explicitly values the small-scale fishing industry and wishes to strengthen the green sectors' competitiveness, while the party programme sees concentration as a threat to sound competition and demands that biological diversity is protected.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto explicitly values the small-scale fishing industry and wishes to strengthen the green sectors' competitiveness, while the party programme sees concentration as a threat to sound competition and demands that biological diversity is protected. A review of quota distribution when rights are gathered by a few large boats, with compensation to the small-scale operators, follows from these commitments.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet värnar uttryckligen den småskaliga fiskenäringen och vill stärka de gröna näringarnas konkurrenskraft, medan partiprogrammet ser koncentration som ett hot mot den sunda konkurrensen och kräver att biologisk mångfald skyddas. En översyn av kvotfördelningen när rättigheterna samlas hos ett fåtal stora båtar, med kompensation till de småskaliga, följer av dessa åtaganden.
- value the small-scale fishing industrydecisive»Skadlig bottentrålning ska inte få förstöra för varken havsmiljön, den småskaliga fiskenäringen eller sportfisket.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Harmful bottom trawling shall not be allowed to destroy the marine environment, the small-scale fishing industry or recreational fishing.”
- counter concentration»Konkurrens är en viktig drivkraft för utvecklingen av marknadsekonomin.« (party programme ↗)“Competition is an important driving force for the development of the market economy.”
- ecosystem-adapted fishing»Att skydda den biologiska mångfalden är nödvändigt för att ekosystemen ska kunna fortleva.« (party programme ↗)“Protecting biological diversity is necessary for ecosystems to continue to survive.”
- green sectors' competitiveness»Vi vill stärka de gröna näringarnas konkurrenskraft.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We wish to strengthen the green sectors' competitiveness.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The party programme requires that regulations shall favour small-scale and coastal fishing and that fishing is kept within scientific frameworks, and the election manifesto that industrial fishing is limited.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme requires that regulations shall favour small-scale and coastal fishing and that fishing is kept within scientific frameworks, and the election manifesto that industrial fishing is limited. A quota system where rights are concentrated among a few large vessels runs counter to this. A review of quota distribution with compensation to small-scale fishermen therefore follows from the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet kräver att regelverket ska gynna småskaligt och kustnära fiske och att fisket hålls inom vetenskapliga ramar, och valmanifestet att industrifisket begränsas. Ett kvotsystem där rättigheterna samlas hos ett fåtal stora båtar går på tvärs mot det. En översyn av kvotfördelningen med kompensation till småskaliga fiskare följer därför av planen.
- favour small-scale coastal fishingdecisive»Regelverket ska gynna småskaligt och kustnära fiske samt« (party programme ↗)“Regulations shall favour small-scale and coastal fishing as well as”
- limited industrial fishing»Kampen mot övergödningen ska fortsätta, industrifisket ska begränsas och de mest värdefulla havsområdena skyddas som marina reservat.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The fight against eutrophication shall continue, industrial fishing shall be limited and the most valuable marine areas protected as marine reserves.”
- ecosystem-adapted fishing»Fisket måste bedrivas på ett långsiktigt hållbart sätt och hålla sig inom ramen för vetenskapliga« (party programme ↗)“Fishing must be conducted in a long-term sustainable manner and stay within scientific”
- reasonable burden on the sector»Regelbördan för små företag ska minska, genom ansträngningar på både kommunal, statlig och« (party programme ↗)“The regulatory burden for small businesses shall be reduced, through efforts at municipal, state and”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan wants personal ownership to be encouraged at the expense of institutional ownership and regards sustainable family farms as the basis of Swedish rural industries.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants personal ownership to be encouraged at the expense of institutional ownership and regards sustainable family farms as the basis of Swedish rural industries. That quotas accumulate with a few large players goes against that ownership structure and risks the coastal communities that depend on the fishing industry. A review of quota allocation with ecosystem adaptation also follows from the stewardship principle.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill att det personliga ägandet uppmuntras på bekostnad av det institutionella och håller bärkraftiga familjejordbruk som basen i den svenska naturnäringen. Att kvoter samlas hos ett fåtal stora aktörer går emot den ägarstrukturen och riskerar de skärgårdssamhällen som är beroende av fiskerinäringen. En översyn av kvotfördelningen med ekosystemanpassning följer också av förvaltarskapsprincipen.
- personal over institutional ownershipdecisive»Det är också angeläget att det personliga ägandet uppmuntras på bekostnad av det institutionella ägandet.« (party programme ↗)“It is also important that personal ownership is encouraged at the expense of institutional ownership.”
- the importance of coastal fishing»Många i skärgården är direkt eller indirekt beroende av en väl fungerande och livskraftig fiskerinäring.« (party programme ↗)“Many in the archipelago are directly or indirectly dependent on a well- functioning and viable fishing industry.”
- family enterprises as basis»Bärkraftiga familjejordbruk bör även i fortsättningen vara basen i svenskt jordbruk.« (party programme ↗)“Sustainable family farms should continue to be the basis in Swedish agriculture.”
- counter overfishing»Ett alltför omfattande fiskeuttag gynnar ingen utan resulterar endast i att tillgången sinar och att näringen på lång sikt dör ut.« (party programme ↗)“Overly extensive fishing takes benefits no one but results only in supplies dwindling and the industry becoming extinct in the long run.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan's concrete fishing commitment is to break the development where large-scale coastal trawling is depleting the stocks, inter alia through a relocated trawl boundary.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's concrete fishing commitment is to break the development where large-scale coastal trawling is depleting the stocks, inter alia through a relocated trawl boundary. A review of quota distribution so that rights do not accumulate with a few large boats and small-scale fishing is protected goes in the same direction. The plan's view of ownership as the foundation for long-term stewardship also speaks for transferable rights, which qualifies the conclusion.
Original (Swedish)
Planens konkreta fiskeriåtagande är att bryta den utveckling där det storskaliga kustnära trålfisket tär på bestånden, bland annat genom en utflyttad trålgräns. En översyn av kvotfördelningen så att rättigheterna inte samlas hos ett fåtal stora båtar och det småskaliga fisket skyddas går i samma riktning. Planens syn på ägande som grunden för långsiktigt förvaltarskap talar samtidigt för överlåtbara rättigheter, vilket kvalificerar slutsatsen.
- break large-scale trawlingdecisive»Fiskerinäringen har drabbats hårt av minskade bestånd på senare år inte minst på grund av det kustnära trålfisket – den utvecklingen måste brytas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The fishing industry has been hit hard by declining stocks in recent years not least because of coastal trawling – that development must be broken.”
- protection of coastal fishing»Stävja minskningen av sill-/strömmingsbestånden i Östersjön genom att flytta gränsen för trålfiske från fyra till tolv nautiska mil« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Stem the decline of herring/sprat stocks in the Baltic Sea by moving the trawl boundary from four to twelve nautical miles”
- strengthened food strategy»Förstärka livsmedelsstrategin« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strengthen the food strategy”
- property rights as stewardship»Den enskilda äganderätten är central i förvaltarskapstanken« (party programme ↗)“Individual property rights are central in stewardship thinking”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto prioritises marine and water environments over overly intensive fishing and wants to utilise the values of rural areas with well-balanced environmental considerations.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto prioritises marine and water environments over overly intensive fishing and wants to utilise the values of rural areas with well-balanced environmental considerations. A review of quota allocation so that fishing can be conducted in an ecosystem-adapted manner and small-scale fishers are not wiped out by quotas being concentrated in the hands of a few is in line with this. Transferable quotas are, however, not addressed in the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet prioriterar havs- och vattenmiljön framför ett alltför intensivt fiske och vill ta tillvara landsbygdens värden med en väl avvägd miljöhänsyn. En översyn av kvotfördelningen så att fisket kan bedrivas ekosystemanpassat och småskaliga fiskare inte slås ut av att kvoterna samlas hos ett fåtal ligger i linje med det. Överlåtbara kvoter behandlas dock inte i planen.
- environment before intensive fishingdecisive»Vår havs- och vattenmiljö måste prioriteras tydligare framför ett allt för intensivt fiske och omfattande vindkraftsutbyggnad.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Our marine and water environments must be prioritised more clearly over overly intensive fishing and extensive wind power expansion.”
- rural livelihoods»Sverige behöver en politik som tar till vara värdet ute i landsbygden och som gör det enklare att i kombination med en väl avvägd miljöhänsyn att skapa fler verksamheter, jobb och ökad tillväxt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden needs a policy that utilises the value out in rural areas and that makes it easier to create more businesses, jobs and increased growth in combination with well-balanced environmental considerations.”
- restored marine environment»Öka takten i arbetet med att återställa havsmiljön i Östersjön« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Increase the pace of work to restore the marine environment in the Baltic Sea”
- business throughout the country»Underlätta för industri och näringsliv i hela landet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Facilitate industry and business throughout the country”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2024/25:MJU19)
- Committee report full text (HC01MJU19)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2024/25:1019 — Rädda sillen, trålfiskeförbud för Östersjön och klimatet av Kerstin Lundgren (C)
- Motion 2024/25:1025 — Det småskaliga kustnära fisket efter Norrlandskusten av Anders W Jonsson (C)
- Motion 2024/25:1033 — Undervattensjakt i Sverige - lärdomar från våra nordiska grannländer av Magnus Berntsson (KD)
- Motion 2024/25:1039 — Utveckling av selektiva redskap för yrkesfisket av Roland Utbult (KD)
- Motion 2024/25:1303 — Flodkräftans bevarande av Runar Filper (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1369 — Svenskt fiske och vattenbruk av Martin Kinnunen m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1395 — Jordbruk - ökad konkurrenskraft utan förlust av biologisk mångfald av Martin Kinnunen m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1676 — Bevarande av ålfisket som ett kulturarv av Ludvig Ceimertz m.fl. (M)
- Motion 2024/25:1778 — Förbud mot storskaligt fiske och bottentrålning av Carl Nordblom (M)
- Motion 2024/25:1828 — Fiske som en del av besöksnäringen av Jennie Wernäng och Marléne Lund Kopparklint (båda M)
- Motion 2024/25:1928 — Hållbart och rättvist fiske av Andrea Andersson Tay m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2024/25:2038 — Det industriella trålfisket i Östersjön av Kjell Jansson m.fl. (M)
- Motion 2024/25:2050 — Levande fiske i Skåne av Ann-Charlotte Hammar Johnsson m.fl. (M)
- Motion 2024/25:2061 — Kvotfiske av blåfenad tonfisk i Bohuslän av Ann-Sofie Alm (M)
- Motion 2024/25:2320 — Hållbart fiske för konsumtion av Sanne Lennström m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2024/25:2364 — Rädda strömmingen i Östersjön av Jesper Skalberg Karlsson m.fl. (M)
- Motion 2024/25:2486 — Vatten, hav och fiske av Stina Larsson m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2024/25:2803 — Bottennära fiske av Sten Bergheden (M)
- Motion 2024/25:2954 — En folkrörelse för klimatet av Muharrem Demirok m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2024/25:2978 — Satsningar på Stockholms skärgård av Markus Wiechel m.fl. (SD)
Source: The Swedish Parliament