2026-05-272025/26:UU4 · p.1UUForeign affairs
Nordic Cooperation
Nordic cooperation: border obstacles and the Helsinki Treaty
What's at stake: The decision affects how quickly practical obstacles facing Nordic citizens and businesses, e.g. in the labour market, social security and border controls, can be removed, and how the legal foundation of Nordic cooperation can be modernised.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the government should step up work on cross-border obstacles and a review of the Helsinki Treaty, or whether the Nordic Border Obstacle Council's new mandate already covers this.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee holds that cross-border obstacle work already operates under an updated 2025–2027 mandate from the Nordic Council's Reykjavik session, focused on bigger structural problems and closer dialogue among cooperation ministers, and therefore rejects the motions on reviving the border-obstacle database. The committee also welcomes that Nordic environmental, climate and energy cooperation is already developing in line with the vision of the Nordic region as the world's most sustainable by 2030.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 1 (C)
C argues that the Nordic border-obstacle database should be revived as soon as possible as a key tool, that the government should evaluate the effects of intra-Nordic border controls on the labour market and business, and that revising the Helsinki Treaty should be given clearer political direction, since the appointed commission lacks a mandate to propose changes to the treaty's political content.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 1 by C.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have held
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: LLiberalerna
Ja 305–24Ja 289–40
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Yes 21/0/0/0 | differs | confidence: low | not addressed |
| S | No | Yes 106/0/0/0 | differs | confidence: low | not addressed |
| MP | No | Abstain 0/0/18/0 | differs | confidence: low | not addressed |
| C | No | No 0/24/0/0 | match | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| L | No | Yes 16/0/0/0 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| KD | No | Yes 19/0/0/0 | differs | confidence: low | not addressed |
| M | No | Yes 66/0/0/0 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| SD | No | Yes 70/0/0/0 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
Committee proposal
Parliament rejects the motions 2025/26:3729 by Kerstin Lundgren et al. (C) demand 44, 2025/26:3986 by Jacob Risberg et al. (MP) demand 1 and 2025/26:4039 by Catarina Deremar and Ulrika Liljeberg (both C) demands 1-3.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2025/26:3729 av Kerstin Lundgren m.fl. (C) yrkande 44, 2025/26:3986 av Jacob Risberg m.fl. (MP) yrkande 1 och 2025/26:4039 av Catarina Deremar och Ulrika Liljeberg (båda C) yrkandena 1-3.
Riksdag decision: Nordic cooperation during 2025 has been addressed in a communication from the government and in an account from the Nordic Council's Swedish delegation. In the communication, the government reports on cooperation between the governments of the Nordic countries during 2025, focusing on activities in the Nordic Council of Ministers. The communication contains information about the informal foreign and security policy cooperation between the Nordic countries, and between the Nordic-Baltic countries, which during 2025 was more intensive than ever. The account presents the Nordic Council's Swedish delegation's activities during the Swedish presidency 2025, which was characterized by a turbulent international environment and the need for strengthened cohesion and cooperation. Parliament laid the communication and the account to the files. Approximately 50 motions were addressed in connection with the matter. The proposals deal with, among other things, Nordic cooperation, foreign and security policy, crisis preparedness and the Arctic. Parliament rejected the motions.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to resume work with the Nordic border obstacle database and initiate an evaluation of the effects of intra-Nordic border controls. (C) — Reservation 1
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan wants to see close cooperation between the Nordic countries, which speaks for giving the work on removing border obstacles sharper tools such as a common database and an evaluation of the effects of border controls.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to see close cooperation between the Nordic countries, which speaks for giving the work on removing border obstacles sharper tools such as a common database and an evaluation of the effects of border controls. The plan also wants political decisions to be made democratically and nationally anchored rather than delegated to bodies without mandate. This is however a derivation: the plan does not address the revision of the Nordic cooperation agreement.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill se ett tätt samarbete mellan de nordiska länderna, vilket talar för att gränshinderarbetet ges skarpare verktyg som en gemensam databas och en utvärdering av gränskontrollernas effekter. Planen vill också att politiska inriktningsbeslut fattas demokratiskt och nationellt förankrat snarare än överlämnas till organ utan mandat. Detta är dock en härledning: planen behandlar inte det nordiska samarbetsavtalets revidering.
- close Nordic cooperationdecisive»Vi vill se ett tätt samarbete mellan de nordiska länderna och ett gott« (party programme ↗)“We want to see close cooperation between the Nordic countries and a good”
- political control instead of technocracy»Vi vill att Sverige utmanar EU:s överstatliga fördrag och lagar« (party programme ↗)“We want Sweden to challenge EU's supranational treaties and laws”
- against closed borders»När rasismen växer, länder sluter sig och EU bygger murar ska Sverige agera för flyktingars rättigheter och försvara asylrätten både i Sverige och internationellt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“When racism grows, countries close themselves and the EU builds walls Sweden should act for refugees' rights and defend the right to asylum both in Sweden and internationally.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan wants to develop Nordic cooperation and sees it as central together with cooperation with the Baltic states.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to develop Nordic cooperation and sees it as central together with cooperation with the Baltic states. Tools such as a border obstacles database and an evaluation of border controls' effects on labour market and business serve that goal and strengthen the business climate. The plan, however, says nothing about revising the cooperation agreement, so the conclusion is derived.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill utveckla det nordiska samarbetet och ser det som centralt tillsammans med samarbetet med de baltiska staterna. Verktyg som en gränshinderdatabas och en utvärdering av gränskontrollernas effekter på arbetsmarknad och näringsliv tjänar det målet och stärker företagsklimatet. Planen säger dock inget om samarbetsavtalets revidering, så slutsatsen är härledd.
- developed Nordic cooperationdecisive»Utvecklat nordiskt samarbete« (party programme ↗)“Developed Nordic cooperation”
- Nordic cooperation central»Också det nordiska samarbetet är centralt, liksom samarbetet med de baltiska staterna.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Nordic cooperation is also central, as is cooperation with the Baltic states.”
- removed obstacles for business»Innovationskraft, gott företagsklimat och stark konkurrenskraft för ökad tillväxt.« (party programme ↗)“Innovation, good business climate and strong competitiveness for increased growth.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan does not address the border barriers database or the Nordic cooperation agreement, but states that security systems shall facilitate workers' mobility across borders and that Sweden shall be tied closer to its Nordic neighbours.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan does not address the border barriers database or the Nordic cooperation agreement, but states that security systems shall facilitate workers' mobility across borders and that Sweden shall be tied closer to its Nordic neighbours. To resume a tool against border barriers and evaluate the effects of border controls on the labour market follows from that principle. However, the derivation is indirect.
Original (Swedish)
Planen behandlar inte gränshinderdatabasen eller det nordiska samarbetsavtalet, men slår fast att trygghetssystemen ska underlätta arbetstagares rörlighet över gränserna och att Sverige ska knytas närmare sina nordiska grannländer. Att återuppta ett verktyg mot gränshinder och utvärdera gränskontrollernas effekter på arbetsmarknaden följer av den principen. Härledningen är dock indirekt.
- mobility across bordersdecisive»Trygghetssystemen ska underlätta arbetstagares rörlighet och våra rättigheter ska respekteras även när vi reser, lever och arbetar i Europa.« (party programme ↗)“Security systems shall facilitate workers' mobility and our rights shall be respected even when we travel, live and work in Europe.”
- closer to Nordic neighbours»säkra och utveckla nattågstrafiken i hela Sverige och knyt oss närmare våra nordiska grannländer och övriga Europa med fler avgångar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“secure and develop night train traffic throughout Sweden and tie us closer to our Nordic neighbours and the rest of Europe with more departures.”
- more interstate cooperation»Vi är övertygade om att det behövs mer samarbete mellan länder för att lösa gränsöverskridande problem.« (party programme ↗)“We are convinced that there is a need for more cooperation between countries to solve cross-border problems.”
- Nordic cooperation»Miljöpartiet ser positivt på ett försvarssamarbete med likasinnade demokratiska stater – särskilt våra grannländer i Norden och Baltikum.« (party programme ↗)“The Green Party views positively defence cooperation with like-minded democratic states – especially our neighbours in the Nordic region and the Baltics.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The party programme establishes that the Centre Party wants to continue removing the barriers that exist for people's mobility and that it is not borders that should be closed but the labour market that should be opened.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme establishes that the Centre Party wants to continue removing the barriers that exist for people's mobility and that it is not borders that should be closed but the labour market that should be opened. A renewed border barriers database and an evaluation of the effects of border controls on the labour market and business are exactly such barrier-removal work. The Nordic cooperation is also given an important role in the programme.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet slår fast att Centerpartiet vill fortsätta avlägsna de hinder som finns för människors rörlighet och att det inte är gränserna som ska stängas utan arbetsmarknaden som ska öppnas. En återupptagen gränshinderdatabas och en utvärdering av gränskontrollernas effekter på arbetsmarknad och näringsliv är precis sådant hinderröjande arbete. Det nordiska samarbetet tillmäts dessutom en viktig roll i programmet.
- remove border barriersdecisive»Centerpartiet vill fortsätta att avlägsna de hinder som finns för enskilda människors rörlighet i världen.« (party programme ↗)“The Centre Party wants to continue to remove the barriers that exist for individuals' mobility in the world.”
- open borders and labour market»är inte gränserna som ska stängas, utan arbetsmarknaden som ska öppnas.« (party programme ↗)“it is not borders that should be closed, but the labour market that should be opened.”
- strengthened Nordic cooperation»Det nordiska samarbetet, som överbryggar många europeiska konstellationer, spelar en viktig roll.« (party programme ↗)“Nordic cooperation, which bridges many European constellations, plays an important role.”
- free trade and openness»Sverige klarar sig inte utan frihandel.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden cannot manage without free trade.”
The plan says explicitly that the Nordic countries shall lead the way and remove border obstacles faster than others, and that freedom grows as border obstacles for travel, work and trade disappear.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan says explicitly that the Nordic countries shall lead the way and remove border obstacles faster than others, and that freedom grows as border obstacles for travel, work and trade disappear. The counter-proposal's demand for a re-launched border obstacles database, evaluation of border controls' effects and clearer political steering of cooperation agreements are tools for precisely this. The plan provides no support for being satisfied with existing forms.
Original (Swedish)
Planen säger uttryckligen att de nordiska länderna ska gå före och riva gränshinder snabbare än andra, och att friheten växer när gränshindren för resor, arbete och handel försvinner. Motförslagets krav på en återupptagen gränshinderdatabas, utvärdering av gränskontrollernas effekter och tydligare politisk styrning av samarbetsavtalet är verktyg för just detta. Planen ger inget stöd för att nöja sig med befintliga former.
- remove Nordic border obstaclesdecisive»De nordiska länderna kan, liksom vi har gjort tidigare med t.ex. passfrihet och gemensam arbetsmarknad, fortsätta att gå före och riva gränshinder snabbare än andra.« (party programme ↗)“The Nordic countries can, like we have done previously with e.g. passport freedom and a shared labour market, continue to lead the way and remove border obstacles faster than others.”
- free movement without border obstacles»Vi vet att friheten växer i takt med att gränshindren för resor, arbete och handel på vår kontinent försvinner.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We know that freedom grows as border obstacles for travel, work and trade on our continent disappear.”
- valued free movement»Den fria rörligheten för individer är grunden i Europasamarbetet och ska värnas.« (party programme ↗)“Free movement for individuals is the foundation of European cooperation and shall be valued.”
- close Nordic cooperation»Sverige bör samarbeta nära med andra länder, både globalt och med våra närmaste grannländer i Norden och Europa.« (party programme ↗)“Sweden should cooperate closely with other countries, both globally and with our nearest neighbours in the Nordic region and Europe.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan defends openness and free movement and wants countries to be able to deepen cooperation at their own pace, which argues for mapping and removing border barriers.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan defends openness and free movement and wants countries to be able to deepen cooperation at their own pace, which argues for mapping and removing border barriers. That evaluation and monitoring are important political tasks supports the requirement for an evaluation of the effects of border controls. The Nordic cooperation agreement is not addressed in the documents.
Original (Swedish)
Planen försvarar öppenheten och den fria rörligheten och vill att länder ska kunna fördjupa samarbetet i egen takt, vilket talar för att gränshinder kartläggs och undanröjs. Att utvärdering och uppföljning är viktiga politiska uppgifter bär kravet på en utvärdering av gränskontrollernas effekter. Det nordiska samarbetsavtalet behandlas inte i dokumenten.
- free movement within the uniondecisive»att försvara öppenheten och den fria rörligheten inom EU genom stärkt kontroll av EU:s yttre gräns« (party programme ↗)“to defend openness and free movement within the EU by strengthening control of the EU's external border”
- evaluation as a political task»Utvärdering, kostnadsuppföljning och kvalitetskontroll är därför viktiga politiska uppgifter.« (party programme ↗)“Evaluation, cost monitoring and quality control are therefore important political tasks.”
- deepened regional cooperation»Inom unionen bör en flexibel integration tillåtas, för att ge länder möjlighet att fördjupa samarbetet i sin egen takt« (party programme ↗)“Within the union flexible integration should be allowed, to give countries the opportunity to deepen cooperation at their own pace”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan commits to strengthening relations with neighbouring countries precisely to secure trade and movement across borders and to deepened cooperation in Northern Europe.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan commits to strengthening relations with neighbouring countries precisely to secure trade and movement across borders and to deepened cooperation in Northern Europe. Resuming border obstacles work as a tool and evaluating the effects of border controls on the labour market and business serves that commitment. The plan's requirement for reduced red tape points in the same direction.
Original (Swedish)
Planen binder sig vid att stärka relationerna till grannländerna just för att säkra handel och rörlighet över gränserna och vid ett fördjupat samarbete i norra Europa. Att återuppta gränshinderarbetet som verktyg och utvärdera gränskontrollernas effekter på arbetsmarknad och näringsliv tjänar det åtagandet. Planens krav på minskat regelkrångel pekar åt samma håll.
- strengthened neighbouring country relationsdecisive»Sveriges relationer till våra grannländer ska stärkas.« (party programme ↗)“Sweden's relations with our neighbouring countries shall be strengthened.”
- deepened Nordic cooperation»Verka för ett fördjupat samarbete i norra Europa« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Work for deepened cooperation in Northern Europe”
- free movement and internal market»Fördjupa den inre marknaden, inte minst för tjänster och digitala produkter« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Deepen the internal market, not least for services and digital products”
- reduced red tape»Minska regelkrånglet och onödig byråkrati, bland annat genom att motverka överimplementering i Sverige av EU-beslut – som huvudregel ska EU-direktiv genomföras på miniminivå« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Reduce red tape and unnecessary bureaucracy, inter alia by preventing over-implementation in Sweden of EU decisions - as a rule EU directives shall be implemented at minimum level”
flags: citat_migrerat
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan requires increased mobility within the Nordic region for people and authorities and points out that smoothed internal borders would increase intra-Nordic trade by hundreds of billions.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires increased mobility within the Nordic region for people and authorities and points out that smoothed internal borders would increase intra-Nordic trade by hundreds of billions. The counter-proposal's requirement for a resumed border barrier database, evaluation of border controls' effects and clearer political direction for the cooperation agreement responds to that commitment. The plan's requirement for joint monitoring of the Nordic region's external border is not addressed by the counter-proposal.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver ökad mobilitet inom Norden för människor och myndigheter och pekar på att nedslipade inre gränser skulle öka den inomnordiska handeln med hundratals miljarder. Motförslagets krav på en återupptagen gränshinderdatabas, utvärdering av gränskontrollernas effekter och tydligare politisk inriktning för samarbetsavtalet svarar mot det åtagandet. Planens krav på gemensam bevakning av Nordens yttre gräns berörs inte av motförslaget.
- increased Nordic mobilitydecisive»Ökad mobilitet inom Norden – för människor och myndigheter« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Increased mobility within the Nordic region – for people and authorities”
- border barriers cost trade»Studier har under de gångna åren visat att om gränserna internt i Norden kunnat slipas ned, så hade värdet av den inomnordiska handeln ökat med hundratals miljarder.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Studies over recent years have shown that if the borders internally in the Nordic region could have been smoothed down, the value of intra-Nordic trade would have increased by hundreds of billions.”
- strengthened Nordic cohesion»Nordisk sammanhållning får inte förpassas till historien, därför krävs också både gemensam forskning och teknikutveckling samt insatser för nordisk språkförståelse och kulturutbyte.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Nordic cohesion must not be relegated to history, therefore both shared research and technological development and efforts for Nordic language understanding and cultural exchange are also required.”
- Nordic external border monitoring»Verka för gemensam nordisk gränsbevakning av Nordens yttre gräns« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Work for joint Nordic monitoring of the Nordic region's external border”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2025/26:UU4)
- Committee report full text (HD01UU4)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2025/26:1537 — En fungerande arbetsmarknad i hela Öresundsområdet av Niels Paarup-Petersen (C)
- Motion 2025/26:2368 — Säkerhetspolitik för en fredligare värld av Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2025/26:2812 — Arktis av Markus Wiechel (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:3047 — Internationellt kris- och hälsosamarbete av Markus Wiechel (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:3054 — Nationell Öresundsagenda av Noria Manouchi m.fl. (M)
- Motion 2025/26:3357 — Om vikten av ett stärkt nordisk-baltiskt samarbete av Lars Püss (M)
- Motion 2025/26:3408 — Försvarets klimat- och miljöpåverkan av Emma Berginger m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2025/26:3411 — Kina - mänskliga rättigheter, miljö och geopolitik av Jacob Risberg m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2025/26:3422 — En grön klimathandlingsplan 2026 av Katarina Luhr m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2025/26:3623 — Internationell samverkan av Morgan Johansson m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:3729 — Internationellt samarbete i en utmanande tid av Kerstin Lundgren m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2025/26:3986 — med anledning av skr. 2025/26:90 Nordiskt samarbete 2025 av Jacob Risberg m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2025/26:4003 — med anledning av skr. 2025/26:90 Nordiskt samarbete 2025 av Håkan Svenneling m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2025/26:4039 — med anledning av skr. 2025/26:90 Nordiskt samarbete 2025 av Catarina Deremar och Ulrika Liljeberg (båda C)
- Motion 2025/26:754 — Nordiskt gränsboendeintyg av Kjell-Arne Ottosson (KD)
- Framställning / redogörelse 2025/26:NR1 — Nordiska rådets svenska delegations redogörelse för verksamheten under 2025
- Regeringens skrivelse 2025/26:90 — Nordiskt samarbete 2025
Source: The Swedish Parliament