2026-03-192025/26:AU6 · p.1AULabour market
National Audit Office report on the Public Employment Service's support for persons with disabilities, etc.
Employment agency support for people with disabilities – processing times and individualized support
What's at stake: Unemployment among people whose disability affects their capacity to work is significantly higher than among other jobseekers, and long processing times can lead employers who want to hire with a wage subsidy to move on to other candidates before support is in place.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the government should take action to sharply cut processing times and ensure fast, individualized support for people with disabilities, and give the public sector a special responsibility as employer and purchaser, or whether the government's work already under way is sufficient without such an instruction.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee welcomes the audit office's review and shares the motion authors' view that society needs to make it easier for people with disabilities to participate in working life, but reaches a different assessment than the motion authors on the immediate need for action. The committee stresses that the employment agency should identify people with reduced work capacity early so that support can be put in place quickly, and recommends rejecting the motions on shorter processing times, individualized support, and a special responsibility for the public sector.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 1 (S)
The reservation (S) wants stronger, more individualized support, with the employment agency retaining a coordinating role and better cooperation with municipalities, education coordinators, social services and healthcare. The reservation points out that long processing times - partly due to slow coding in the employment agency's systems - lead employers wanting to hire with a wage subsidy to move on to other candidates, and wants processing times halved and the public sector given a special responsibility as an employer and purchaser of services from Samhall and similar providers.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: closing the file on the government's report (no further action) and rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 1 by S.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have gone the other way
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: LLiberalerna
Ja 107–93Nej 95–105
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Abstain 0/0/17/5 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
| S | No | No 0/92/1/13 | match | confidence: high | explicit |
| MP | No | Abstain 0/0/13/5 | differs | confidence: high | derived |
| C | No | Yes 21/0/0/3 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
| L | No | Yes 12/0/0/4 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: medium | explicit |
| KD | No | Yes 14/0/0/5 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
| M | No | Yes 60/0/0/8 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
| SD | No | Abstain 0/0/61/10 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
Broke with the party line
| SJoakim Sandell (S, Malmö kommun) | Abstain — party line: No |
MPs whose vote differs from their party's majority position in this division. Marked with a dark ring in the chamber view.
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2025/26:949 by Daniel Persson (SD), 2025/26:1951 by Mattias Vepsä and Alexandra Völker (both S) motion 2, 2025/26:3543 by Nils Seye Larsen et al. (MP) motion 14, 2025/26:3590 by Ardalan Shekarabi et al. (S) motion 12, 2025/26:3877 by Magnus Persson et al. (SD) motion 1, 2025/26:3878 by Ciczie Weidby et al. (V) motion 1 and 2025/26:3887 by Leila Ali Elmi et al. (MP) motions 1 and 3-5 as well as files government communication 2025/26:72.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2025/26:949 av Daniel Persson (SD), 2025/26:1951 av Mattias Vepsä och Alexandra Völker (båda S) yrkande 2, 2025/26:3543 av Nils Seye Larsen m.fl. (MP) yrkande 14, 2025/26:3590 av Ardalan Shekarabi m.fl. (S) yrkande 12, 2025/26:3877 av Magnus Persson m.fl. (SD) yrkande 1, 2025/26:3878 av Ciczie Weidby m.fl. (V) yrkande 1 och 2025/26:3887 av Leila Ali Elmi m.fl. (MP) yrkandena 1 och 3-5 samt lägger skrivelse 2025/26:72 till handlingarna.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag directs a formal statement (tillkännagivande) to the government to review the regulation on special measures for persons with disabilities resulting in reduced work capacity. Examples of special measures are wage subsidies, subsidies for workplace aids and interpreters for persons with visual or hearing impairments. The reason for the review is to ensure that the conditions for the measures contribute to achieving the purpose of the labor market policy program. The formal statement is based on proposals in motions in response to the government's communication regarding the National Audit Office's audit report Employment Service Support for Persons with Disabilities. In the report, the National Audit Office concludes that there are shortcomings in how effectively the Employment Service works with the target group. Furthermore, the National Audit Office assesses that the government's steering has not been sufficiently effective. The Labor Market Committee believes that the National Audit Office's audit is an important contribution to the work of providing appropriate measures to persons with disabilities affecting work capacity. The Committee also notes that the government has already taken several measures to improve the support and that further measures may be needed. The Riksdag rejected the other proposals in the motions and filed the government communication.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants people with disabilities to receive faster, more individualized support from the Employment Agency and for processing times to be significantly reduced. (S) — Reservation 1
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan requires that someone living with a disability can trust getting the support they need without constantly having to fight for it, and that everyone should be able to have work and self-support.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that someone living with a disability can trust getting the support they need without constantly having to fight for it, and that everyone should be able to have work and self-support. It notes that the group has higher unemployment and wants to create a more inclusive society through strengthened welfare. Shorter processing times, more individually tailored support and a particular responsibility for the public follow from this.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att den som lever med funktionsnedsättning ska kunna lita på att få det stöd som behövs utan att ständigt behöva strida för det, och att alla ska kunna ha arbete och försörjning. Den konstaterar att gruppen har högre arbetslöshet och vill skapa ett mer inkluderande samhälle genom en stärkt välfärd. Kortare handläggningstider, mer individanpassat stöd och ett särskilt ansvar för det offentliga följer av detta.
- support without questioningdecisive»På samma sätt ska du som lever med funktionsnedsättning kunna lita på att du får det stöd du behöver, och på att din rätt att delta i samhället på det sätt du vill inte ständigt ifrågasätts och försvåras.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“In the same way, you who live with a disability should be able to rely on getting the support you need, and on your right to participate in society in the way you want not constantly being questioned and impeded.”
- participation through work»Det handlar om allt ifrån att ha arbete och försörjning, vara med« (party programme ↗)“It is about everything from having work and self-support, to being part”
- higher unemployment in the group»Människor med normbrytande funktionalitet har idag som grupp« (party programme ↗)“People with non-normative functionality currently have as a group”
- inclusive society»Vi vill skapa ett mer inkluderande samhälle genom att stärka välfärden« (party programme ↗)“We want to create a more inclusive society by strengthening welfare”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan explicitly promises more individually designed measures to create jobs or education for people with disabilities, which is the core of the counter-proposal's demand for stronger and more individually tailored support.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan explicitly promises more individually designed measures to create jobs or education for people with disabilities, which is the core of the counter-proposal's demand for stronger and more individually tailored support. The plan wants an active labour market policy with an employment agency in state administration, which supports the requirement for a coherent authority role and shorter processing times. That the public sector shall lead as an employer follows from the requirement that everyone's working capacity shall be utilized.
Original (Swedish)
Planen lovar uttryckligen mer individuellt utformade insatser för att skapa jobb eller utbildning för personer med funktionsnedsättning, vilket är kärnan i motförslagets krav på starkare och mer individanpassat stöd. Planen vill ha en aktiv arbetsmarknadspolitik med arbetsförmedling i statlig regi, vilket bär kravet på en sammanhållande myndighetsroll och kortare handläggningstider. Att det offentliga ska gå före som arbetsgivare följer av att allas arbetsförmåga ska tas tillvara.
- individualized work supportdecisive»Vi vill se mer individuellt utformade insatser för att skapa jobb eller utbildning för personer med funktionsnedsättningar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to see more individually designed measures to create jobs or education for people with disabilities.”
- state employment agency»Aktiv arbetsmarknadspolitik med arbetsförmedling i statlig regi.« (party programme ↗)“Active labour market policy with an employment agency in state administration.”
- everyone's working capacity is utilized»Allas arbetsförmåga tas tillvara.« (party programme ↗)“Everyone's working capacity is utilized.”
- removed obstacles for participation»Undanröjda hinder för personer med funktionsnedsättning att delta i samhällslivet.« (party programme ↗)“Removed obstacles for people with disabilities to participate in community life.”
The plan wants to see more paths into the labour market and improved labour market policy for people with disabilities, and requires that people should not be passed between authorities when they need society's support.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to see more paths into the labour market and improved labour market policy for people with disabilities, and requires that people should not be passed between authorities when they need society's support. Shorter processing times, a unified authority role and better cooperation are precisely that. The plan also places a particular responsibility on the public sector, whose activities shall be accessible to all.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill se fler vägar in på arbetsmarknaden och en förbättrad arbetsmarknadspolitik för personer med funktionsnedsättning, och kräver att människor inte bollas mellan myndigheter när de behöver samhällets stöd. Kortare handläggningstider, en sammanhållande myndighetsroll och bättre samverkan är precis det. Planen lägger också ett särskilt ansvar på det offentliga, vars verksamhet ska vara tillgänglig för alla.
- more paths into the labour marketdecisive»Vi vill se fler vägar in på arbetsmarknaden och en förbättrad arbetsmarknadspolitik för« (party programme ↗)“We want to see more paths into the labour market and improved labour market policy for”
- unified support»se till att människor inte bollas mellan myndigheter när de behöver samhällets stöd.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“ensure that people are not passed between authorities when they need society's support.”
- right preconditions for work»Ingen ska heller vara utan jobb för att rätt sorts hjälpmedel inte finns att tillgå på arbetsplatsen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“No one shall be without work because the right kind of aid equipment is not available at the workplace.”
- public sector leads»offentlig verksamhet ska vara tillgänglig för alla.« (party programme ↗)“public sector activities shall be accessible to all.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan requires that matching be improved and that everyone has the right to an effective matching service, that lead times in administrative practice be shortened and that it becomes cheaper and easier to employ those far from the labour market.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that matching be improved and that everyone has the right to an effective matching service, that lead times in administrative practice be shortened and that it becomes cheaper and easier to employ those far from the labour market. Long processing times that make employers give up wage subsidy employments go against all this. More individualized and coordinated support thus follows from the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att matchningen förbättras och att alla har rätt till en effektiv matchningstjänst, att ledtiderna i myndighetsutövningen kortas och att det blir billigare och lättare att anställa dem som står långt från arbetsmarknaden. Långa handläggningstider som gör att arbetsgivare hoppar av lönebidragsanställningar strider mot allt detta. Ett mer individanpassat och samordnat stöd följer därför av planen.
- effective matchingdecisive»Matchningen måste förbättras. Alla ska ha rätt till en effektiv matchningstjänst och det ska bli lättare att hitta medarbetare inom alla yrken.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Matching must be improved. Everyone should have the right to an effective matching service and it should be easier to find employees within all professions.”
- shorter processing times»Alla som bor i Sverige ska kunna få sin sak prövad. Ledtiderna för handläggning och myndighetsutövning i domstolar och myndigheter måste kortas och tillgången till ombud förbättras.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Everyone living in Sweden should be able to have their matter examined. Processing times for hearings and administrative practice in courts and authorities must be shortened and access to legal representatives improved.”
- easier to hire»Det måste bli billigare och lättare att anställa, särskilt personer som står långt från arbetsmarknaden.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It must become cheaper and easier to employ, especially people far from the labour market.”
- support with disability»Du som har en funktionsnedsättning ska få det stöd du behöver, och staten ska ta ett större ansvar för att LSS fungerar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“You who have a disability should get the support you need, and the state should take greater responsibility for LSS to function.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan makes opening the labour market for persons with disabilities a main task and establishes that public employers shall be models and that the public sector shall take increased responsibility for those far from the labour market.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan makes opening the labour market for persons with disabilities a main task and establishes that public employers shall be models and that the public sector shall take increased responsibility for those far from the labour market. Stronger individually adapted support and special responsibility for the public as an employer are precisely these commitments.
Original (Swedish)
Planen gör det till en huvuduppgift att öppna arbetsmarknaden för personer med funktionsnedsättning och slår fast att offentliga arbetsgivare ska vara föredömen och att den offentliga sektorn ska ta ökat ansvar för dem som står långt från arbetsmarknaden. Ett starkare individanpassat stöd och ett särskilt ansvar för det offentliga som arbetsgivare är precis dessa åtaganden.
- open the labour marketdecisive»En huvuduppgift är därför att öppna arbetsmarknaden för personer med« (party programme ↗)“A main task is therefore to open the labour market for persons with”
- public employers as model»arbetsgivare ska vara föredömen.« (party programme ↗)“employers shall be models.”
- public responsibility for vulnerable groups»Den offentliga sektorn ska ta ökat ansvar för att« (party programme ↗)“The public sector shall take increased responsibility for”
- clear authority role»Arbetsförmedlingens myndighetsuppdrag ska tydligt skiljas från utförarrollen.« (party programme ↗)“The Employment Service's authority remit shall be clearly separated from its implementation role.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan requires that support and services for persons with disabilities be designed according to the individual's needs, which is the core of the counter-proposal's demand for stronger and more individually tailored support.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that support and services for persons with disabilities be designed according to the individual's needs, which is the core of the counter-proposal's demand for stronger and more individually tailored support. Compensatory measures are described as necessary, and labour market policy should be supportive when required, which argues against employers being lost due to long processing times. That the state and municipalities should lead by example as employers carries the requirement for a particular responsibility for the public sector.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att stöd och service till personer med funktionsnedsättning utformas efter den enskildes behov, vilket är kärnan i motförslagets krav på ett starkare och mer individanpassat stöd. Kompensatoriska insatser beskrivs som nödvändiga, och arbetsmarknadspolitiken ska vara stödjande när så krävs, vilket talar mot att arbetsgivare tappas bort på grund av långa handläggningstider. Att stat och kommun ska föregå med gott exempel som arbetsgivare bär kravet på ett särskilt ansvar för offentlig sektor.
- support according to the individual's needsdecisive»den enskildes behov. Ansträngningar måste göras för att säkerställa en hög grad av valfrihet i« (party programme ↗)“the individual's needs. Efforts must be made to ensure a high degree of choice in”
- compensatory measures»Även insatser som är kompensatoriska minskar betydelsen« (party programme ↗)“Even measures that are compensatory reduce the significance”
- public sector as a model»föregå med gott exempel bland annat då det gäller att anställa människor med« (party programme ↗)“lead by example including when it comes to employing people with”
- supportive labour market policy»Arbetsmarknadspolitiken ska vara subsidiär på så sätt att samhällets insatser ska vara« (party programme ↗)“Labour market policy shall be supportive in that society's efforts shall be”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan wants to shorten the processing time of authorities with an outer time limit and significantly reduce the cost of employing someone far from the job market.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to shorten the processing time of authorities with an outer time limit and significantly reduce the cost of employing someone far from the job market. The counter-proposal's demand for halved processing times and more individualized support directly meets this, because long waiting times make employers reject the candidate. The plan's work line is built on making use of each person's working capacity.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill korta myndigheternas handläggningstider med en bortre tidsgräns och kraftigt sänka kostnaden för att anställa den som står långt från arbetsmarknaden. Motförslagets krav på halverade handläggningstider och mer individanpassat stöd svarar direkt mot det, eftersom långa väntetider gör att arbetsgivare väljer bort kandidaten. Planens arbetslinje bygger på att varje persons arbetsförmåga tas till vara.
- shorter processing timesdecisive»Korta myndigheternas handläggningstider genom en bortre tidsgräns« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Shorten the processing time of authorities through an outer time limit”
- lower thresholds for employment»Kraftigt sänka kostnaden för att anställa långtidsarbetslösa« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Significantly reduce the cost of employing the long-term unemployed”
- the work line»Skatter och bidragssystem ska utgå från arbetslinjen.« (party programme ↗)“Taxes and benefit systems shall be based on the work line.”
- more pathways into work»Bygga ut antalet praktikplatser med 30 000« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Expand the number of internship places by 30,000”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The counter-proposal wants stronger and more individually adapted support, halved processing times and better coordination around people with disabilities.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The counter-proposal wants stronger and more individually adapted support, halved processing times and better coordination around people with disabilities. The plan requires that people with disabilities' opportunities to participate in the labour market be strengthened based on individual circumstances, and that processing times be shortened with more flexible and individually adapted decisions. The requirement thus follows from the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Motförslaget vill ha ett starkare och mer individanpassat stöd, halverade handläggningstider och bättre samverkan kring personer med funktionsnedsättning. Planen kräver att funktionsnedsattas möjligheter till deltagande på arbetsmarknaden stärks utifrån individuella förutsättningar, och att handläggningstiderna kortas med mer flexibla och individanpassade beslut. Kravet följer därmed av planen.
- strengthened access to the labour marketdecisive»Funktionsnedsattas och funktionsvarierades möjligheter till deltagande på arbetsmarknaden måste stärkas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“People with disabilities and those with functional variation must have their opportunities to participate in the labour market strengthened.”
- individual circumstances»Sverigedemokraterna vill stärka möjligheten för personer med nedsatt arbetsförmåga att delta i arbetslivet och i sysselsättning utifrån individuella förutsättningar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden Democrats want to strengthen the opportunity for people with reduced work capacity to participate in working life and in employment based on individual circumstances.”
- shorter processing times»Sverigedemokraterna vill också verka för kortare handläggningstider, mer rättssäkra beslut och kvalitetssäkring i utredningsarbetet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden Democrats also want to work for shorter processing times, more legally secure decisions and quality assurance in investigation work.”
- individually adapted decision-making»Öka flexibiliteten och individanpassningen i beslutsfattandet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Increase flexibility and individual adaptation in decision-making”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2025/26:AU6)
- Committee report full text (HD01AU6)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2025/26:1951 — Starkare tillsammans - för en rättvis funktionshinderspolitik som håller ihop Sverige av Mattias Vepsä och Alexandra Völker (båda S)
- Motion 2025/26:3543 — Ett samhälle för alla - stärkt funktionsrätt, trygg personlig assistans och rätt till ledsagning av Nils Seye Larsen m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2025/26:3590 — Utgiftsområde 14 Arbetsmarknad och arbetsliv av Ardalan Shekarabi m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:3872 — med anledning av skr. 2025/26:72 Riksrevisionens rapport om Arbetsförmedlingens stöd till personer med funktionsnedsättning av Ardalan Shekarabi m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:3877 — med anledning av skr. 2025/26:72 Riksrevisionens rapport om Arbetsförmedlingens stöd till personer med funktionsnedsättning av Magnus Persson m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:3878 — med anledning av skr. 2025/26:72 Riksrevisionens rapport om Arbetsförmedlingens stöd till personer med funktionsnedsättning av Ciczie Weidby m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2025/26:3887 — med anledning av skr. 2025/26:72 Riksrevisionens rapport om Arbetsförmedlingens stöd till personer med funktionsnedsättning av Leila Ali Elmi m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2025/26:949 — Fler personer med en funktionsnedsättning i arbete av Daniel Persson (SD)
- Regeringens skrivelse 2025/26:72 — Riksrevisionens rapport om Arbetsförmedlingens stöd till personer med funktionsnedsättning
Source: The Swedish Parliament