2026-06-032025/26:KrU9 · p.2KrUCulture

The direction of policy for architecture, form and design

What's at stake: Architecture, form and design policy concerns how the shared environment is shaped and who gets to help influence it, including children and young people in the places where they spend time. The question is whether the government's new direction needs to be supplemented with concrete measures and a clear implementation plan to have an impact, or whether a more general approach gives those involved better scope to adapt measures to their own circumstances.

Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.

What the vote decides

The motion called for the government to produce a new, more concrete policy document for architecture, form and design policy, while the committee held that a broad direction without specified measures gives better scope for adapting over time.

Yes Yes — the committee proposal

The committee has some understanding for the view that the direction can in places come across as generally worded, but considers that a broad design without specified activities has advantages since it allows adaptation over time and gives those involved scope to shape measures based on their own circumstances, and therefore rejects the motion while intending to follow how the matter develops.

No No — the reservations

Reservation 1 (V, MP)

The reserving parties (V, MP) consider the government's new direction to be vaguely worded and unclear, making it hard to understand what it means and how it is to be implemented, and say it also lacks an explicit children's-rights perspective even though, under the Convention on the Rights of the Child, children and young people have a right to influence over the built environments where they spend time, and want the government to come back with a new, clearer direction.

Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.

VSMPCLKDMSD
YesNoAbstainAbsent

What do the votes mean here?

Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).

No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 1 by V, MP.

Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.

What each plan points to — and how the party voted

For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.

PlanVoteConfidenceEvidence
Vown reservationNoNo 0/21/0/0follows the planconfidence: lownot addressed
SNoYes 106/0/0/0departs from the planconfidence: lownot addressed
MPown reservationNoNo 0/18/0/0follows the planconfidence: lownot addressed
CYesYes 23/0/0/1follows the planconfidence: mediumderived
LYesYes 16/0/0/0follows the planconfidence: lowderived
KDNoYes 19/0/0/0departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
MYesYes 66/0/0/0follows the planconfidence: lowderived
SDNoYes 70/0/0/0departs from the planconfidence: mediumderived

Committee proposal

The Riksdag rejects motion 2025/26:4053 by Mats Berglund et al. (MP) motions 1-7.

Original (Swedish)

Riksdagen avslår motion 2025/26:4053 av Mats Berglund m.fl. (MP) yrkandena 1-7.

Riksdag decision: The government has in a letter presented a new direction for work toward the national objective for architecture, form and design policy. The new direction means, among other things, that more actors shall be involved and different perspectives shall be included when the shared environment is to be designed. Dialogue and cooperation shall increase between public actors, business, civil society and local communities. The Riksdag shares the government's view that it is important that everyone is given good opportunities to influence changes to the shared environment and therefore welcomes the government's initiative for a new direction for work toward the national objective for architecture, form and design policy. The Riksdag referred the government's letter to the records, which meant that the matter was closed.

Counter-proposals

Plan vs actual vote

Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.

VVänsterpartietNoNofollows the plannot addressed

The plan wants to realize stronger rights for children and has expressed confidence in young people's ability to decide about their lives, which speaks for the counter-proposal's demand for a clear child rights perspective in the direction for shaped living environments.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan wants to realize stronger rights for children and has expressed confidence in young people's ability to decide about their lives, which speaks for the counter-proposal's demand for a clear child rights perspective in the direction for shaped living environments. The plan also requires societal planning with genuine democratic anchorage, which sits poorly with a vaguely held direction without specified measures. However, this is a derivation; the plan does not address architecture, form and design policy.

Original (Swedish)

Planen vill förverkliga starkare rättigheter för barn och har uttalat förtroende för ungas förmåga att fatta beslut om sina liv, vilket talar för motförslagets krav på ett tydligt barnrättsperspektiv i inriktningen för gestaltade livsmiljöer. Planen kräver också en samhällsplanering med genuin demokratisk förankring, vilket rimmar illa med en vagt hållen inriktning utan angivna åtgärder. Detta är dock en härledning; planen behandlar inte arkitektur-, form- och designpolitiken.

  • children's rightsdecisive»Utvecklingen mot starkare rättigheter för barn är en av de progressiva« (party programme ↗)“Development towards stronger rights for children is one of the progressive”
  • democratically anchored planning»Planeringen behöver en genuin demokratisk« (party programme ↗)“Planning needs genuine democratic”
  • youth influence»Vi har ett starkt förtroende för unga människors förmåga att fatta« (party programme ↗)“We have strong confidence in young people's ability to decide”
  • culture available to everyone»Politiken ska skapa förutsättningar för en bred kultur som kommer alla till del och hålla armlängds avstånd till innehållet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Politics should create conditions for broad culture available to all and maintain arm's length distance from content.”
SSocialdemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan does not address policy for architecture, form and design.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan does not address policy for architecture, form and design. The nearest-lying principles are that culture shall be present in all people's everyday life, that cultural infrastructure with meeting places shall be built out and that everyone has the right to a safe immediate environment. From this the demand for a clearer orientation with a children's rights perspective lies closer to the plan than a generally held wording.

Original (Swedish)

Planen behandlar inte politiken för arkitektur, form och design. Närmast liggande principer är att kulturen ska vara närvarande i alla människors vardag, att den kulturella infrastrukturen med mötesplatser ska byggas ut och att alla har rätt till en trygg närmiljö. Utifrån dessa ligger kravet på en tydligare inriktning med barnrättsperspektiv närmare planen än en allmänt hållen skrivning.

  • culture in everyday lifedecisive»Kulturen ska vara närvarande i alla människors vardag.« (party programme ↗)“Culture shall be present in all people's everyday life.”
  • designed meeting places»Kulturell infrastruktur med fler samlingslokaler och andra mötesplatser« (party programme ↗)“Cultural infrastructure with more community halls and other meeting places”
  • safe living environment»Rätt till trygg närmiljö för alla, prioritering av trygghetsskapande arbete.« (party programme ↗)“Right to safe immediate environment for all, prioritisation of safety-creating work.”
  • children and young people's participation»Livskraftigt föreningsliv som särskilt stöttar barn och unga.« (party programme ↗)“Vigorous association life that particularly supports children and young people.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

MPMiljöpartietNoNofollows the plannot addressed

The plan states that what is built should be pleasant and safe with good architecture and greenery and that buildings should take account of cultural and natural values.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan states that what is built should be pleasant and safe with good architecture and greenery and that buildings should take account of cultural and natural values. The plan also sees children as active co-creators of society, which supports the counter-proposal's demand for an explicit child rights perspective in the designed living environments. The plan does not however say anything about how a political direction in the area should be formulated.

Original (Swedish)

Planen slår fast att det som byggs ska vara trivsamt och tryggt med god arkitektur och grönska och att bebyggelse ska ta hänsyn till kultur- och naturvärden. Planen ser också barn som aktiva medskapare av samhället, vilket bär motförslagets krav på ett uttalat barnrättsperspektiv i de gestaltade livsmiljöerna. Planen säger dock inget om hur en politisk inriktning på området bör formuleras.

  • good architecture and greenerydecisive»Det vi bygger ska vara trivsamt och tryggt för människor, med god arkitektur och grönska.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“What we build should be pleasant and safe for people, with good architecture and greenery.”
  • children as co-creators»Barn är aktiva medskapare av samhället och ska inte ses som passiva mottagare av det samhälle som vuxna skapar åt dem.« (party programme ↗)“Children are active co-creators of society and should not be seen as passive receivers of the society adults create for them.”
  • regard for cultural and natural values»Bebyggelse ska ta hänsyn till kultur- och naturvärden och bidra till goda livsmiljöer.« (party programme ↗)“Construction should take account of cultural and natural values and contribute to good living environments.”
  • children's designed living environments»Skolgårdarna ska vara inspirerande, gröna, tillgängliga och trygga platser för lek, rörelse och återhämtning.« (party programme ↗)“School playgrounds should be inspiring, green, accessible and safe places for play, movement and recovery.”
CCenterpartietYesYesfollows the planderived

The party programme states that policy should be careful not to act as a tastemaker and instead focus on creating preconditions, and the election manifesto that policy should maintain arm's length from culture.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The party programme states that policy should be careful not to act as a tastemaker and instead focus on creating preconditions, and the election manifesto that policy should maintain arm's length from culture. A broad-based direction that leaves room for actors themselves thus comes closer to the plan than a new, more detailed state direction. The plan's emphasis on children's rights pulls in the opposite direction but weighs less.

Original (Swedish)

Partiprogrammet slår fast att politiken ska akta sig för att agera smakdomare och i stället fokusera på att skapa förutsättningar, och valmanifestet att politiken ska hålla armlängds avstånd till kulturen. En övergripande inriktning som lämnar utrymme åt aktörerna själva ligger därmed närmare planen än en ny, mer detaljerad statlig inriktning. Planens betoning av barnens rättigheter drar åt motsatt håll men väger lättare.

  • no political direction-setting in culturedecisive»Politiken ska akta sig för att agera smakdomare och diktera kulturens innehåll.« (party programme ↗)“Policy should be careful not to act as a tastemaker and dictate the content of culture.”
  • arm's length»Politiken ska bidra till goda förutsättningar men hålla armlängds avstånd.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Policy should contribute to good conditions but maintain arm's length.”
  • create conditions, not govern»Politiken ska fokusera på att skapa förutsättningar för alla att delta i kulturlivet.« (party programme ↗)“Policy should focus on creating conditions for everyone to participate in cultural life.”
  • children's rights perspective»Av största betydelse är då barnens rättigheter och perspektiv.« (party programme ↗)“Of greatest importance are then the rights and perspectives of children.”
LLiberalernaYesYesfollows the planderived

The plan establishes that the state shall steer culture less and that public financing shall take forms that guarantee independence from political detailed control.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan establishes that the state shall steer culture less and that public financing shall take forms that guarantee independence from political detailed control. A requirement for a new, more precisely formulated state direction pulls in the opposite direction and therefore gets no support. The plan's acknowledgement of children's and young people's rights does speak in favour of a child rights perspective, but does not carry the requirement for a new direction.

Original (Swedish)

Planen slår fast att staten ska styra kulturen mindre och att offentlig finansiering ska ske i former som garanterar oberoende från politisk detaljstyrning. Ett krav på en ny, mer preciserad statlig inriktning drar åt motsatt håll och får därför inte stöd. Planens erkännande av barns och ungas rättigheter talar visserligen för barnrättsperspektivet, men bär inte kravet på en ny inriktning.

  • the state shall steer culture lessdecisive»Kulturpolitiken ska utgå från frihet, mångfald och kvalitet men ska inte lägga sig i innehållet i kulturen. Därför vill vi att staten ska styra mindre och att det ska vara kulturskapare och inte politiker som fattar besluten om stöd.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Cultural policy shall be based on freedom, diversity and quality but shall not meddle in the content of culture. Therefore we want the state to steer less and for it to be culture creators and not politicians who make decisions about support.”
  • cultural policy without steering»Den liberala kulturpolitikens uppgift är inte att styra kulturen, utan att förbättra förutsättningarna för det konstnärliga skapandet och för individens bildning.« (party programme ↗)“The liberal cultural policy's task is not to steer culture, but to improve the conditions for artistic creation and for the individual's education.”
  • freedom from detailed control»Offentlig finansiering ska ske i former som garanterar kulturlivets oberoende gentemot politisk detaljstyrning.« (party programme ↗)“Public financing shall take place in forms that guarantee the cultural life's independence from political detailed control.”
  • children's rights»Barn och ungdomar har rätt att respekteras som individer och i takt med åldern få ta ett ökande ansvar för sin egen tillvaro.« (party programme ↗)“Children and young people have the right to be respected as individuals and with increasing age take increasing responsibility for their own lives.”
KDKristdemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan requires architecture and urban planning that creates lasting values and safe, aesthetically pleasing local environments, and it explicitly highlights children as the smallest citizens in the planning with the best interests of the child in the foremost place.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan requires architecture and urban planning that creates lasting values and safe, aesthetically pleasing local environments, and it explicitly highlights children as the smallest citizens in the planning with the best interests of the child in the foremost place. A vaguely formulated direction without a child rights perspective does not meet these commitments, which supports the counter-proposal's demand for a new and clearer direction.

Original (Swedish)

Planen kräver en arkitektur och stadsplanering som skapar bestående värden och trygga, estetiskt tilltalande närmiljöer, och den lyfter uttryckligen fram barnen som de minsta medborgarna i planeringen med barnets bästa i främsta rummet. En vagt formulerad inriktning utan barnrättsperspektiv svarar inte mot dessa åtaganden, vilket bär motförslagets krav på en ny och tydligare inriktning.

  • architecture with lasting valuesdecisive»Därför är det av stor vikt med en arkitektur och stadsplanering som skapar bestående värden och är hållbar i begreppets fulla bemärkelse.« (party programme ↗)“Therefore, it is of great importance to have architecture and urban planning that creates lasting values and is sustainable in the full sense of the term.”
  • plan with children in mind»skapar ett småskaligt och greppbart boende även för de minsta av våra medborgare« (party programme ↗)“creates small-scale and comprehensible housing also for the smallest of our citizens”
  • the best interests of the child»FN:s barnkonvention stadgar att barnets bästa ska komma i främsta rummet.« (party programme ↗)“The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child stipulates that the best interests of the child should come first.”
  • safe and beautiful local environment»En trygg och estetiskt tilltalande närmiljö är viktig för att vi ska må väl och utvecklas i positiv riktning.« (party programme ↗)“A safe and aesthetically pleasing local environment is important for us to feel well and develop in a positive direction.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

MModeraternaYesYesfollows the planderived

The plan wants to give citizens greater influence over architecture and replace advanced plans with simpler ones, not establish a more detailed state direction.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan wants to give citizens greater influence over architecture and replace advanced plans with simpler ones, not establish a more detailed state direction. It also warns that public funding and political ambitions constitute a risk in culture and media policy. The counter-proposal's demand for a new, clearer and more precise direction therefore goes against the plan's line.

Original (Swedish)

Planen vill ge medborgarna större inflytande över arkitekturen och ersätta avancerade planer med enklare, inte lägga fast en mer detaljerad statlig inriktning. Den varnar också för att offentlig finansiering och politiska ambitioner utgör en risk i kultur- och mediepolitiken. Motförslagets krav på en ny, tydligare och mer preciserad inriktning går därför emot planens linje.

  • citizen influence over architecturedecisive»Låta medborgare få större inflytande över arkitekturen för att minska överklaganden« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Allow citizens to have greater influence over architecture to reduce appeals”
  • political control of culture is a risk»offentlig finansiering och politiska ambitioner utgör en risk.« (party programme ↗)“public funding and political ambitions constitute a risk.”
  • free cultural life»Fria medier och ett fritt kulturliv är fundament i ett pluralistiskt« (party programme ↗)“Free media and a free cultural life are fundamental in a pluralistic”
  • simpler planning»Ersätta avancerade detaljplaner med enklare byggplaner« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Replace advanced detailed plans with simpler building plans”
SDSverigedemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The plan takes a clear position on design matters: it wants to work for pleasant and safe areas with classical architecture and emphasises aesthetics and design as crucial to how an environment is experienced.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan takes a clear position on design matters: it wants to work for pleasant and safe areas with classical architecture and emphasises aesthetics and design as crucial to how an environment is experienced. A vaguely framed direction without precisions does not provide such steering, and the plan additionally requires that a child and family perspective permeates spatial planning. The plan therefore supports the requirement for a new and clearer direction.

Original (Swedish)

Planen tar tydlig ställning i gestaltningsfrågan: den vill verka för trivsamma och trygga områden med klassisk arkitektur och framhåller estetik och gestaltning som avgörande för hur en miljö upplevs. En vagt hållen inriktning utan preciseringar ger inte den styrningen, och planen kräver dessutom att barn- och familjeperspektivet är genomgående i samhällsplaneringen. Planen stöder därför kravet på en ny och tydligare inriktning.

  • classical architecturedecisive»Sverigedemokraterna vill verka för trivsamma och trygga områden med klassisk arkitektur.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden Democrats want to work for pleasant and safe areas with classical architecture.”
  • aesthetics and safety»Estetik och gestaltning är viktiga faktorer för hur en miljö upplevs och för tryggheten.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Aesthetics and design are important factors for how an environment is experienced and for safety.”
  • child and family perspective»barn- och familjeperspektivet vara genomgående och grönytor och naturliknande« (party programme ↗)“child and family perspective be pervasive and green spaces and nature-like”
  • citizen influence over environments»Fördela offentliga kulturmedel och utforma offentliga miljöer med ett större medborgarinflytande« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Distribute public cultural funding and design public environments with greater citizen influence”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

Share and embed

Embed as a widget (iframe): previewSizeLanguage

Sources and documents

Documents under consideration

Source: The Swedish Parliament