2025-02-262024/25:JuU21 · p.2JuUJustice
Time limitation
Time limit on the law on secret data interception
What's at stake: A continued time limit would mean parliament must revisit the law within a set period and could factor in the outcome of an upcoming review, whereas removing that limit lets the rules apply indefinitely.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the law on secret data interception should remain subject to a time limit pending a broader review of secret coercive measures, or whether the legislation should apply without such a time limit.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee rejects the motions calling for a continued time limit on the law on secret data interception and instead backs the government's proposal, under which the legislation applies without a new time limit.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 2 (V, MP)
The reservation (V, MP), in line with the Council on Legislation's assessment, wants the law on secret data interception to remain time-limited pending a comprehensive review of secret coercive measures, arguing that a continued time limit would not harm crime-fighting and that several consultation bodies, including the Swedish Bar Association and the National Council for Crime Prevention, have questioned the tool's benefit and the adequacy of the evidence for it.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 2 by V, MP.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
What each plan points to — and how the party voted
For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| Plan | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | No 0/19/0/5 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| S | Yes | Yes 93/0/0/13 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| MP | No | No 0/15/0/3 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| C | No | Yes 21/0/0/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| L | Yes | Yes 12/0/0/4 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| KD | Yes | Yes 15/0/0/4 | follows the plan | confidence: low | derived |
| M | Yes | Yes 60/0/0/8 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| SD | Yes | Yes 63/0/0/9 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
Committee proposal
Parliament rejects the motions 2024/25:3271 by Gudrun Nordborg et al. (V) motion 6 and 2024/25:3279 by Rasmus Ling et al. (MP) motion 1.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2024/25:3271 av Gudrun Nordborg m.fl. (V) yrkande 6 och 2024/25:3279 av Rasmus Ling m.fl. (MP) yrkande 1.
Riksdag decision: Parliament approved the government's proposal that secret data reading against serious crimes should continue to be permitted. The proposal entails that certain rules are clarified and in some cases the possibility of using secret data reading is expanded. The proposal entails, among other things: The law shall apply without time limitation. Secret data reading shall be allowed to be used in more cases in order to investigate who may reasonably be suspected of a crime. The rules for what types of information may be obtained shall be clarified. The rules for the formulation of a permit for secret data reading shall be clarified. Excess information that has emerged from secret data reading may be used for other purposes. The legal certainty of the individual shall be strengthened. Among other things through improved opportunities for transparency and oversight. Current legislation ceases to apply on 31 March 2025. The legislative amendments are proposed to come into force on 1 April 2025. At the same time, Parliament said no to several motions, one of which was a proposal in a motion submitted during the general motion period of 2024.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to reject expanded secret data access capabilities and limit the use of overflow information from coercive measures. (V, MP) — Reservation 2
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The party programme makes personal integrity a right and requires legal security with citizen oversight and independent scrutiny; a continued time limitation is precisely such a control mechanism pending a comprehensive review.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme makes personal integrity a right and requires legal security with citizen oversight and independent scrutiny; a continued time limitation is precisely such a control mechanism pending a comprehensive review. The plan also requires that legislation shall be designed so that it proves effective, which speaks for that a measure with questioned demonstrated benefit not be made permanent. The counter-proposal's requirement therefore has support in the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet gör den personliga integriteten till en rättighet och kräver rättssäkerhet med medborgerlig insyn och oberoende granskning; en fortsatt tidsbegränsning är just en sådan kontrollmekanism i avvaktan på en samlad översyn. Planen kräver också att lagstiftning ska vara utformad så att den visar sig effektiv, vilket talar för att en åtgärd med ifrågasatt påvisad nytta inte görs permanent. Motförslagets krav har därmed stöd i planen.
- protection of personal integritydecisive»rätt till skydd av sin personliga integritet« (party programme ↗)“right to protection of their personal integrity”
- legal security and oversight»Rättssäkerheten behöver upprätthållas genom rättshjälp, medborgerlig« (party programme ↗)“Legal security needs to be maintained through legal aid, citizen”
- requirement for demonstrated effect»förslag som visar sig effektiva och rättvisa den dag de genomförs.« (party programme ↗)“proposals that prove effective and fair on the day they are implemented.”
- scepticism towards harder approaches»Alltför ofta lyfts repression och hårdare tag upp som lösningar istället för att ta itu med problemen på allvar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Too often repression and harder approaches are put forward as solutions instead of tackling problems seriously.”
The election manifesto commits to giving the police more tools, explicitly better opportunities for wiretapping, and that the fight against crime shall be uncompromising.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto commits to giving the police more tools, explicitly better opportunities for wiretapping, and that the fight against crime shall be uncompromising. A continued time-limitation on secret data reading, motivated by the fact that benefit has not been demonstrated, pulls in the opposite direction from that commitment. The party programme's integrity commitment speaks for continued regulation and control, but not for the tool to be provided with a new outer limit.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet åtar sig att ge polisen fler verktyg, uttryckligen bättre möjligheter till avlyssning, och att kampen mot kriminaliteten ska vara kompromisslös. En fortsatt tidsbegränsning av hemlig dataavläsning, motiverad med att nyttan inte är visad, drar i motsatt riktning mot det åtagandet. Partiprogrammets integritetsåtagande talar för fortsatt reglering och kontroll, men inte för att verktyget ska förses med ny bortre gräns.
- more tools for the policedecisive»Polisen behöver också fler verktyg, som bättre möjligheter till avlyssning och husrannsakan.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The police also need more tools, such as better opportunities for wiretapping and house searches.”
- uncompromising crime fighting»Kampen mot kriminaliteten ska vara kompromisslös.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The fight against crime shall be uncompromising.”
- society's full force against gangs»Samhällets fulla kraft ska mobiliseras för att trycka tillbaka de kriminella, kapa återväxten in i kriminaliteten och öka tryggheten.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Society's full force shall be mobilised to push back the criminals, cut the regrowth into criminality and increase safety.”
- protection of personal integrity»Det är samhällets absoluta skyldighet att skydda friheten och den personliga integriteten« (party programme ↗)“It is society's absolute duty to protect freedom and personal integrity”
Secret data interception is one of the most intrusive coercive measures, and the plan requires that policy protects privacy as surveillance capabilities increase and opposes disproportionate privacy violations.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
Secret data interception is one of the most intrusive coercive measures, and the plan requires that policy protects privacy as surveillance capabilities increase and opposes disproportionate privacy violations. Continued time limitation pending a comprehensive review maintains precisely that proportionality test. The plan accepts that authorities have tools against crime, but not that they are made permanent without testing their utility.
Original (Swedish)
Hemlig dataavläsning är ett av de mest ingripande tvångsmedlen, och planen kräver att politiken slår vakt om integriteten när övervakningsmöjligheterna ökar och motsätter sig oproportionerliga integritetsingrepp. En fortsatt tidsbegränsning i avvaktan på en samlad översyn håller kvar just den proportionalitetsprövningen. Planen godtar att myndigheterna har verktyg mot kriminaliteten, men inte att de permanentas utan prövning av nyttan.
- no disproportionate privacy violationsdecisive»Vi motsätter oss alla lagar som innebär oproportionerliga ingrepp i integriteten.« (party programme ↗)“We oppose all laws that involve disproportionate privacy violations.”
- protect privacy against surveillance»De ökade möjligheterna till övervakning kräver att politiken slår vakt om människors möjlighet att värna sin integritet.« (party programme ↗)“Increased surveillance capabilities require that policy protects people's ability to safeguard their privacy.”
- rights before crime prevention»Brotts- och terrorbekämpning är viktigt men ska inte ske på bekostnad av mänskliga rättigheter.« (party programme ↗)“Crime and counterterrorism are important but should not happen at the expense of human rights.”
- right to privacy»Vi vill värna människors rätt till integritet och privatliv.« (party programme ↗)“We want to protect people's right to privacy and private life.”
The election manifesto says no to a range of intrusive methods, including preventive wiretapping, and the party programme demands proportionality between restriction and purpose as well as testing of all legislation against integrity impact.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto says no to a range of intrusive methods, including preventive wiretapping, and the party programme demands proportionality between restriction and purpose as well as testing of all legislation against integrity impact. Continued time-limitation of secret data reading enforces precisely that recurring testing. The plan thus speaks for the counter-proposal's demand.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet säger nej till en rad ingripande metoder, bland dem preventiv avlyssning, och partiprogrammet kräver proportionalitet mellan inskränkning och syfte samt prövning av all lagstiftning mot integritetspåverkan. En fortsatt tidsbegränsning av hemlig dataavläsning tvingar fram just den återkommande prövningen. Planen talar därför för motförslagets krav.
- no to intrusive coercive measuresdecisive»Vi säger därför nej till visitationszoner, kollektiv bestraffning, omvänd bevisbörda, anonyma vittnen, preventiv avlyssning och inskränkningar av religionsfriheten.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We therefore say no to search zones, collective punishment, reversed burden of proof, anonymous witnesses, preventive wiretapping and restrictions of religious freedom.”
- proportionality requirement»Det måste finnas en proportionalitet mellan lagstiftningens inskränkning av medborgarnas integritet och lagarnas syfte.« (party programme ↗)“There must be proportionality between the law's restriction of citizens' integrity and the laws' purpose.”
- integrity testing of legislationweak support»All lagstiftning bör prövas mot dess påverkan på människors personliga integritet.« (party programme ↗)“All legislation should be tested against its impact on people's personal integrity.”
- integrity as democratic cornerstone»Respekten för den enskildes personliga integritet är en grundsten i varje demokrati.« (party programme ↗)“Respect for the individual's personal integrity is a cornerstone in every democracy.”
flags: citat_svagt
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto, which weighs most, wants secret coercive measures to be able to be used in more crimes than today and also without concrete suspicion against organized gang members, and that police get more tools.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto, which weighs most, wants secret coercive measures to be able to be used in more crimes than today and also without concrete suspicion against organized gang members, and that police get more tools. Retaining a time limitation and questioning the benefit of secret data interception pulls in the opposite direction. The plan's integrity requirement sets conditions on how the tool is regulated, but does not speak for it to be temporary.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet, som väger tyngst, vill att hemliga tvångsmedel ska kunna användas vid fler brott än i dag och även utan konkret brottsmisstanke mot organiserade gängmedlemmar, och att polisen får fler verktyg. Att behålla en tidsbegränsning och ifrågasätta nyttan av hemlig dataavläsning drar i motsatt riktning. Planens integritetskrav ställer villkor på hur verktyget regleras, men talar inte för att det ska vara tillfälligt.
- expanded secret coercive measuresdecisive»Avlyssning och andra hemliga tvångsmedel ska kunna användas både vid misstanke om fler brott än i dag och efter domstolsbeslut mot organiserade gängmedlemmar även utan konkret brottsmisstanke.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Interception and other secret coercive measures shall be able to be used both when suspecting more crimes than today and after court decision against organized gang members even without concrete suspicion.”
- more tools to police»Ge polisen fler verktyg och vapen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Give police more tools and weapons.”
- more effective crime investigation»Rättsväsendets förmåga och effektivitet behöver förbättras så att handläggningstiderna kortas, fler brott anmäls och klaras upp samt färre brottsanmälningar avskrivs.« (party programme ↗)“The legal system's capability and efficiency need to be improved so that processing times shorten, more crimes are reported and solved, and fewer crime reports are dismissed.”
- integrity review of measures»Åtgärder som påverkar den personliga integriteten negativt är endast berättigade om ett motstående intresse väger uppenbart tyngre och åtgärden är effektiv.« (party programme ↗)“Measures that negatively affect personal integrity are only justified if an opposing interest weighs significantly more and the measure is effective.”
The plan requires that all crimes are effectively prosecuted and that Sweden can meet attacks from international crime and terrorism, and it raises politics' task to ensure long-term rules for society.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that all crimes are effectively prosecuted and that Sweden can meet attacks from international crime and terrorism, and it raises politics' task to ensure long-term rules for society. That keeping a time limit for the law on secret data interception in awaiting a broader review pulls in the opposite direction. The plan's requirement for caution with personal integrity speaks however for the counter-proposal, therefore certainty is low.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att alla brott effektivt beivras och att Sverige kan möta angrepp från internationell kriminalitet och terrorism, och den lyfter politikens uppgift att säkerställa långsiktiga spelregler för samhället. Att behålla en tidsbegränsning för lagen om hemlig dataavläsning i avvaktan på en bredare översyn drar i motsatt riktning. Planens krav på försiktighet med den personliga integriteten talar dock för motförslaget, varför säkerheten är låg.
- effective crime prosecutiondecisive»Alla brott ska effektivt och utan undantag beivras« (party programme ↗)“All crimes shall be effectively and without exception prosecuted”
- long-term rules»att säkerställa de långsiktiga spelreglerna för samhället.« (party programme ↗)“to ensure long-term rules for society.”
- meet international crime»möta angrepp från internationell kriminalitet, terrorism« (party programme ↗)“meet attacks from international crime, terrorism”
- caution with integrity»försiktighet och respekt för den personliga integriteten« (party programme ↗)“caution and respect for personal integrity”
The plan's decisive commitment is that legislation shall be adapted so that more gang criminals are held accountable and that the justice system is strengthened to clear up more crimes.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's decisive commitment is that legislation shall be adapted so that more gang criminals are held accountable and that the justice system is strengthened to clear up more crimes. Continued time-limitation of covert data interception, motivated by doubt about the measure's usefulness, pulls in the opposite direction and makes the tool uncertain over time. The plan requires that personal integrity be protected, but that does not outweigh the commitment to effective crime-fighting tools. The requirement is rejected.
Original (Swedish)
Planens avgörande åtagande är att lagstiftningen ska anpassas så att fler gängkriminella ställs till svars och att rättsväsendet rustas upp för att klara upp fler brott. En fortsatt tidsbegränsning av hemlig dataavläsning, motiverad av tvivel på åtgärdens nytta, drar i motsatt riktning och gör verktyget osäkert över tid. Planen kräver att den personliga integriteten värnas, men det väger inte upp åtagandet om verkningsfulla brottsbekämpande verktyg. Kravet avvisas.
- adapted legislation against gangsdecisive»lagstiftningen måste anpassas därefter så att fler ställs till svars och försvinner från gatan« (2022 manifesto ↗)“legislation must be adapted so that more are held accountable and disappear from the streets”
- strengthen the justice system»Vi ska rusta upp rättsväsendet för att utreda och klara upp fler brott« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We shall strengthen the justice system to investigate and clear up more crimes”
- strengthened security police»Stärka Säkerhetspolisen för att öka deras förmåga att skydda den liberala demokratin och landets alla medborgare« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strengthen the Security Police to increase their capacity to protect liberal democracy and the country's all citizens”
- protected personal integrity»Den personliga integriteten ska värnas« (party programme ↗)“Personal integrity shall be protected”
The election manifesto demands that the justice system get more effective tools against gang crime and that gang members can be mapped through, among other things, wiretapping, and that procedural obstacles be removed.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto demands that the justice system get more effective tools against gang crime and that gang members can be mapped through, among other things, wiretapping, and that procedural obstacles be removed. Continuing time-limitation of secret data reading pending a broader review would instead keep the tool uncertain and questioned. The plan therefore speaks against the counter-proposal's demands.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet kräver att rättsväsendet får mer effektiva verktyg mot gängbrott och att gängaktiva ska kunna kartläggas genom bland annat avlyssning, samt att processuella hinder undanröjs. En fortsatt tidsbegränsning av hemlig dataavläsning i avvaktan på en bredare översyn skulle tvärtom hålla verktyget osäkert och ifrågasatt. Planen talar därför mot motförslagets krav.
- effektivare verktyg mot gängendecisive»Framförallt behöver rättsväsendet få mer effektiva verktyg för att bekämpa gängbrott.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Above all, the justice system needs more effective tools to combat gang crime.”
- avlyssning mot gängaktiva»Åtgärder ska vidtas för att bättre kunna kartlägga gängaktiva genom t.ex. underrättelsearbete och informationsinhämtning, spaning, kameraövervakning och avlyssning.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Steps shall be taken to better map gang members through e.g. intelligence work and information gathering, surveillance, camera surveillance and wiretapping.”
- undanröj processuella hinder»Processuella hinder för att möjliggöra en ökad lagföring måste också undanröjas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Procedural obstacles to enable increased prosecution must also be removed.”
- befogenheter åt rättsväsendet»resurser och befogenheter för att kunna lösa sina uppgifter och skydda medborgarna.« (party programme ↗)“resources and powers to be able to fulfil their tasks and protect citizens.”
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2024/25:JuU21)
- Committee report full text (HC01JuU21)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2024/25:3111 — Utgiftsområde 4 Rättsväsendet av Teresa Carvalho m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2024/25:3271 — med anledning av prop. 2024/25:51 Hemlig dataavläsning mot allvarliga brott av Gudrun Nordborg m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2024/25:3279 — med anledning av prop. 2024/25:51 Hemlig dataavläsning mot allvarliga brott av Rasmus Ling m.fl. (MP)
- Proposition 2024/25:51 — Hemlig dataavläsning mot allvarliga brott
Source: The Swedish Parliament