2024-12-042024/25:SoU5 · p.7SoUHealth & social services
Time-limited legislation
Time-limiting the law on seclusion during nighttime rest at special youth homes
What's at stake: The decision determines how long an intrusive coercive measure against children and young people at special youth homes can be used without the Riksdag revisiting it, affecting both the children's legal safeguards and staff's ability to handle acute situations at night.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the new power to hold children and young people in seclusion during nighttime rest at special youth homes should be permanent, or time-limited to one year and then lapse unless a new decision is taken.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee backs the government's proposal without a time limit. Despite ongoing work to strengthen care quality and staffing, the situation at the youth homes during evenings and nights is still assessed as very serious, and the committee considers a legally regulated power to use seclusion during nighttime rest necessary to create safety and prevent absconding.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 9 (C)
The reservation wants the legislative change to be temporary, lasting one year and then lapsing, arguing that the shortcomings at the special youth homes should be fixed first and that the need for coercive measures will shrink as care improves through the government's investments in competence and resources.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 9 by C.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
What each plan points to — and how the party voted
For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| Plan | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Abstain 0/0/17/7 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| S | No | Yes 93/0/0/13 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | derived |
| MP | No | Yes 15/0/0/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| C | No | No 0/20/0/4 | follows the plan | confidence: low | derived |
| L | Yes | Yes 10/0/0/6 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| KD | Yes | Yes 16/0/0/3 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| M | Yes | Yes 60/0/0/8 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| SD | Yes | Yes 62/0/0/10 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects motion 2024/25:3261 by Martina Johansson et al. (C) request 2.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motion 2024/25:3261 av Martina Johansson m.fl. (C) yrkande 2.
Riksdag decision: According to a proposal from the government, the Swedish Agency for State Institutional Care (Statens institutionsstyrelse, SiS), should have the opportunity in certain cases to hold children and young people in solitary confinement in connection with nighttime rest at special youth homes. The Riksdag said yes to the government's proposal. Solitary confinement in connection with nighttime rest can occur if it is necessary for the order or security of the special youth home. Another reason can be to prevent the child or young person from absconding from the home. The purpose of the proposal is to increase safety and security. The proposal applies to children and young people who are cared for on a locked unit at a special youth home with enhanced security level or who are serving closed youth care. The legislative changes take effect on December 15, 2024.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants parliament to reject the proposal. (C) — Reservation 9
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan means that shortcomings in activities for children and young people should be met with resources and preventative work, not with harder approaches, and that the child's best interest should guide in every case.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan means that shortcomings in activities for children and young people should be met with resources and preventative work, not with harder approaches, and that the child's best interest should guide in every case. That a possibility for isolation in that case applies only temporarily, while care is upgraded, lies closer to the plan than a permanent coercive rule. The counter-proposal's requirement for time-limitation is therefore supported.
Original (Swedish)
Planen menar att brister i verksamheter för barn och unga ska mötas med resurser och förebyggande arbete, inte med hårdare tag, och att barnets bästa ska styra i varje läge. Att en möjlighet till avskildhet i så fall bara gäller tillfälligt, medan vården rustas upp, ligger närmare planen än en permanent tvångsregel. Motförslagets krav på tidsbegränsning stöds därför.
- prevention before repressiondecisive»Alltför ofta lyfts repression och hårdare tag upp som lösningar istället för att ta itu med problemen på allvar. Det kräver nämligen omfattande förebyggande insatser.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Too often repression and harder approaches are put forward as solutions instead of tackling problems seriously. This requires extensive preventative efforts.”
- child's best interest»principen att i varje läge se till barnets« (party programme ↗)“the principle that in every case consider the child's”
- resources for child protection»förstärk socialtjänsten med tillräckliga resurser och kunskap för att arbeta både förebyggande och med barnskydd« (2022 manifesto ↗)“strengthen social services with sufficient resources and knowledge to work both preventatively and with child protection”
- staffing and competence»välfärden har goda arbetsvillkor och löner.« (party programme ↗)“welfare has good working conditions and wages.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan's line is that shortcomings concerning children in society's care are met with strengthened social services, more social measures and secured skills supply, and that the child's best interests must be considered in all decisions.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's line is that shortcomings concerning children in society's care are met with strengthened social services, more social measures and secured skills supply, and that the child's best interests must be considered in all decisions. This speaks for the counter-proposal's demand that an expanded possibility for seclusion shall be temporary while care is upgraded. The plan does not, however, take a stance on coercive measures as such, so the conclusion is weakly supported.
Original (Swedish)
Planens linje är att bristerna kring barn i samhällets vård möts med stärkt socialtjänst, fler sociala insatser och säkrad kompetensförsörjning, och att barnens bästa ska beaktas vid alla beslut. Det talar för motförslagets krav att en utökad möjlighet till avskildhet ska vara tillfällig medan vården rustas upp. Planen tar dock inte ställning till tvångsåtgärder som sådana, varför slutsatsen är svagt underbyggd.
- the child's best interests decidesdecisive»Alla barn ska ha rätt till en trygg uppväxt i enlighet med FN:s barnkonvention.« (party programme ↗)“All children shall have the right to a safe upbringing in accordance with the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child.”
- social measures before coercion»Vi vill se fler och mer långtgående sociala insatser« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to see more and more far-reaching social measures”
- skills supply in welfare»Staten har ett ansvar för att säkra kompetensförsörjningen, inte minst i välfärden.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The state has responsibility for securing skills supply, particularly in welfare.”
- staff must be able to intervene»Lärare och annan personal i skolan ska omedelbart kunna ingripa vid stök och oro.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Teachers and other school staff must immediately be able to intervene in disorder and unrest.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan's line is that shortcomings should be met with investments in care, competence and staffing rather than permanent coercive measures, and that decisions concerning children should be tested against the Convention on the Rights of the Child.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's line is that shortcomings should be met with investments in care, competence and staffing rather than permanent coercive measures, and that decisions concerning children should be tested against the Convention on the Rights of the Child. A time-limited legal change keeps coercion open for reconsideration as care improves, which is close to the plan's commitments. The plan therefore supports the counter-proposal's demand for temporary legislation.
Original (Swedish)
Planens linje är att bristerna ska mötas med satsningar på vård, kompetens och bemanning snarare än med permanenta tvångsbefogenheter, och att beslut som rör barn ska prövas mot barnkonventionen. En tidsbegränsad lagändring håller tvånget öppet för omprövning i takt med att vården förbättras, vilket ligger nära planens åtaganden. Planen stöder därför motförslagets krav på tillfällig lagstiftning.
- investments before restrictionsdecisive»I det nya gröna folkhemmet sätter vi satsningar framför restriktioner, och ser möjligheter istället för hot.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“In the new green people's home we put investments before restrictions, and see opportunities instead of threats.”
- care measures when deprived of liberty»• höja maxtiden för sluten ungdomsvård och förstärka vårdinsatser och utbildning under tiden den unge är frihetsberövad, samt införa en utslussningsverksamhet när straffet är avtjänat.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“raise the maximum time for closed youth care and strengthen care measures and education while the young person is deprived of liberty, and introduce exit preparation when the sentence is completed.”
- child impact analysis of decisions»FN:s barnkonvention ska bli svensk lag och politiska beslut bör föregås av en barnkonsekvensanalys.« (party programme ↗)“The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child should become Swedish law and political decisions should be preceded by a child impact analysis.”
- humane and rehabilitative care»Kriminalvård ska vara human och ha som mål att den som dömts inte ska återfalla i kriminalitet.« (party programme ↗)“Criminal care should be humane and aimed at ensuring that the convicted person does not reoffend.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The party programme requires that all legislation be tested against its impact on integrity, that any restriction be proportionate to its purpose, and defends freedom from coercion and paternalism.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme requires that all legislation be tested against its impact on integrity, that any restriction be proportionate to its purpose, and defends freedom from coercion and paternalism. The election manifesto simultaneously ties better staffing to better results, which supports the counter-proposal's logic that the need for coercive measures decreases when care is strengthened. A time-limited isolation rule is thus the solution the plan's principles point toward.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet kräver att all lagstiftning prövas mot sin påverkan på integriteten, att inskränkningen står i proportion till syftet, och försvarar friheten från tvång och förmynderi. Valmanifestet knyter samtidigt bättre bemanning till bättre resultat, vilket stöder motförslagets logik att behovet av tvångsåtgärder minskar när vården förstärks. En tidsbegränsad avskildhetsregel är därmed den lösning planens principer pekar mot.
- integrity testing of all legislationweak support»All lagstiftning bör prövas mot dess påverkan på människors personliga integritet.« (party programme ↗)“All legislation should be tested against its impact on people's personal integrity.”
- freedom from coerciondecisive»frihet från tvång, våld och förmynderi« (party programme ↗)“freedom from coercion, violence and paternalism”
- child's right to respect»Särskilt viktigt är att värna varje barns rätt att bli respekterad och att bli sedd för den man är.« (party programme ↗)“Particularly important is to protect every child's right to be respected and to be seen for who they are.”
- staffing before coercion»Att anställa fler sjuksköterskor leder till mindre stress på jobbet och bättre resultat för patienten.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Employing more nurses leads to less stress at work and better results for patients.”
flags: citat_svagt
The plan's line is that coercive measures against young offenders shall be expanded and extended, not time-limited: more shall be able to be taken into custody and the maximum care time within closed youth care shall be extended.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's line is that coercive measures against young offenders shall be expanded and extended, not time-limited: more shall be able to be taken into custody and the maximum care time within closed youth care shall be extended. A sunset rule after one year is based on the assumption that the need for coercion is temporary, which the plan does not start from. The protection of integrity justifies review, not automatic cessation.
Original (Swedish)
Planens linje är att tvångsmöjligheterna gentemot unga lagöverträdare ska byggas ut och förlängas, inte tidsbegränsas: fler ska kunna omhändertas och den maximala vårdtiden inom sluten ungdomsvård ska förlängas. En solnedgångsregel efter ett år bygger på att behovet av tvång är övergående, vilket planen inte utgår från. Integritetsskyddet motiverar prövning, inte automatiskt upphörande.
- extended coercive periods for young peopledecisive»Den maximala vårdtiden för sluten ungdomsvård ska förlängas« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The maximum care time for closed youth care shall be extended”
- more forced custody of young people»att betydligt fler barn som fostras in i kriminalitet eller själva begår grova brott ska kunna omhändertas« (2022 manifesto ↗)“that significantly more children raised into criminality or who themselves commit serious crimes shall be able to be taken into custody”
- more placements in youth homes»Fler unga i behov av omfattande sociala insatser ska placeras på särskilda ungdomshem.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“More young people in need of comprehensive social measures shall be placed in special youth homes.”
- strengthened integrity protection»Skyddet för den enskildes integritet ska stärkas.« (party programme ↗)“Protection of the individual's integrity shall be strengthened.”
The election manifesto wants to strengthen the social services' possibilities for compulsory measures against children and young people, and the party programme emphasizes long-term rules for society.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto wants to strengthen the social services' possibilities for compulsory measures against children and young people, and the party programme emphasizes long-term rules for society. A rule that expires after one year gives the opposite: temporary and uncertain authority. The plan therefore does not support the counter-proposal's requirement for time limitation, even though the restrictive view on coercion points in the opposite direction.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet vill stärka socialtjänstens möjligheter till tvingande åtgärder gentemot barn och unga, och partiprogrammet betonar långsiktiga spelregler för samhället. En regel som upphör efter ett år ger det motsatta: en tillfällig och osäker befogenhet. Planen ger därför inte stöd för motförslagets krav på tidsbegränsning, även om den restriktiva synen på tvång pekar i motsatt riktning.
- compulsory measures against youthdecisive»Stärk sociala insatser och socialtjänstens möjligheter till tvingande åtgärder gentemot barn och unga som begår brott.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strengthen social services and social services' possibilities for compulsory measures against children and young people who commit crimes.”
- long-term rules»Det innebär bland annat att säkerställa de långsiktiga spelreglerna för samhället.« (party programme ↗)“This means among other things ensuring the long-term rules for society.”
- safe upbringing for children»Barn har rätt till en trygg uppväxtmiljö.« (party programme ↗)“Children have the right to a safe growing-up environment.”
- restrictive use of coercion»Tvångsvård ska användas restriktivt« (party programme ↗)“Compulsory care shall be used restrictively”
The plan wants more young people to be taken into care under the Act on Care of Young Persons (LVU), for youth prisons to be established and for more young offenders to be remanded in custody.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants more young people to be taken into care under the Act on Care of Young Persons (LVU), for youth prisons to be established and for more young offenders to be remanded in custody. It thus demands lasting and sharper coercive tools against disorder among placed young people, not temporary ones. A legislative change that automatically expires after one year does not correspond to that commitment, which is why the counter-proposal's demand is rejected.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill att fler unga omhändertas enligt LVU, att ungdomsfängelser inrättas och att fler unga lagöverträdare häktas. Den efterfrågar alltså varaktiga och skarpare tvångsverktyg mot ordningsproblem bland placerade unga, inte tillfälliga. En lagändring som automatiskt upphör efter ett år motsvarar inte det åtagandet, varför motförslagets krav avvisas.
- more LVU placementsdecisive»Säkerställa att fler omhändertas enligt LVU« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Ensure that more are taken into care under LVU”
- toughened tools against young people»Utreda sänkt straffmyndighetsålder och inrätta ungdomsfängelser« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Investigate lowering the age of criminal responsibility and establish youth prisons”
- detention of young offenders»Se till att fler unga lagöverträdare häktas när det rör sig om allvarliga brott och det finns risk för återfall« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Ensure that more young offenders are remanded in custody when it concerns serious crimes and there is a risk of reoffending”
- responsibility from a young age»skolan och socialtjänsten ska inskärpa den enskildes ansvar« (party programme ↗)“schools and social services shall emphasize the individual's responsibility”
The plan wants to give social services, schools and the judicial system the ability to intervene more firmly at an early stage and believes that few measures are too far-reaching when it comes to destructive environments, including removing young people who grow up in a negative environment.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to give social services, schools and the judicial system the ability to intervene more firmly at an early stage and believes that few measures are too far-reaching when it comes to destructive environments, including removing young people who grow up in a negative environment. Time-limiting the solitary confinement option to one year and letting it expire directly contradicts this commitment. The plan assumes lasting tools, not temporary ones.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill ge socialtjänst, skola och rättsväsende möjlighet att ingripa med tuffare tag i ett tidigt skede och anser att få åtgärder är för långtgående mot destruktiva miljöer, inklusive att omhänderta unga som växer upp i en negativ miljö. Att tidsbegränsa avskildhetsmöjligheten till ett år och låta den upphöra går tvärtemot detta åtagande. Planen förutsätter varaktiga verktyg, inte tillfälliga.
- tougher early interventionsdecisive»Ge socialtjänst, skola och rättsväsende möjlighet att ingripa med tuffare tag i ett tidigt skede« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Give social services, schools and the judicial system the ability to intervene with tougher measures at an early stage”
- no measures too far-reaching»Sverigedemokraterna anser att få politiska åtgärder är för långtgående när det kommer till att pressa tillbaka både de kriminella gängen och den kultur som gör att de får fäste.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden Democrats believe that few political measures are too far-reaching when it comes to pressing back both the criminal gangs and the culture that allows them to gain a foothold.”
- removal of at-risk youth»omhänderta barn och unga som växer upp i en negativ miljö« (2022 manifesto ↗)“remove children and young people who grow up in a negative environment”
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2024/25:SoU5)
- Committee report full text (HC01SoU5)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2024/25:3260 — med anledning av prop. 2024/25:41 Avskildhet i anslutning till dygnsvilan - för ökad trygghet och säkerhet på särskilda ungdomshem av Maj Karlsson m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2024/25:3261 — med anledning av prop. 2024/25:41 Avskildhet i anslutning till dygnsvilan - för ökad trygghet och säkerhet på särskilda ungdomshem av Martina Johansson m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2024/25:3262 — med anledning av prop. 2024/25:41 Avskildhet i anslutning till dygnsvilan - för ökad trygghet och säkerhet på särskilda ungdomshem av Ulrika Westerlund m.fl. (MP)
- Proposition 2024/25:41 — Avskildhet i anslutning till dygnsvilan - för ökad trygghet och säkerhet på särskilda ungdomshem
Source: The Swedish Parliament