2026-06-152025/26:NU25 · p.3NUBusiness & energy

Designated Electricity Agreements

Future model for default (assigned) electricity contracts

What's at stake: The decision affects electricity users who have not actively chosen a supplier, and determines whether they risk being left without electricity if they fail to sign a new contract, or whether they continue to be guaranteed supply through a procured solution. It particularly affects vulnerable electricity customers and price competition in the market.

Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.

What the vote decides

The question is how the system of default electricity contracts should be designed once the current one is abolished: whether electricity users must actively sign a contract with a supplier to receive electricity, or whether a new default supplier should instead be procured through competitive tendering, similar to the Norwegian model.

Yes Yes — the committee proposal

The committee welcomes the government's new model replacing the current default electricity contracts and shares the assessment that a procurement-based solution, similar to Norway's, is less suitable; the committee therefore rejects the motion calling for such regulation.

No No — the reservations

Reservation 2 (S, V, MP)

The reservation (S, V, MP) welcomes abolishing the current default electricity contracts, but argues that requiring electricity users to actively sign a contract to receive electricity risks serious economic and health consequences; instead they want a Norwegian-style model with regular procurement of a default electricity supplier, which would both push down prices and guarantee supply.

Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.

VSMPCLKDMSD
YesNoAbstainAbsent

What do the votes mean here?

Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).

No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 2 by S, V, MP.

Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.

What each plan points to — and how the party voted

For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.

PlanVoteConfidenceEvidence
Vown reservationNoNo 0/21/0/0follows the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
Sown reservationNoNo 0/105/0/1follows the planconfidence: mediumderived
MPown reservationNoNo 0/18/0/0follows the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
CNoYes 24/0/0/0departs from the planconfidence: lowderived
LNoYes 16/0/0/0departs from the planconfidence: lowderived
KDNoYes 19/0/0/0departs from the planconfidence: lownot addressed
MYesYes 66/0/0/0follows the planconfidence: lownot addressed
SDNoYes 70/0/0/0departs from the planconfidence: lownot addressed

Committee proposal

The Riksdag rejects motion 2025/26:4129 by Fredrik Olovsson et al. (S).

Original (Swedish)

Riksdagen avslår motion 2025/26:4129 av Fredrik Olovsson m.fl. (S).

Riksdag decision: The Riksdag voted yes to the government's proposal for a new electricity market act and for a new law on electrical installations. The Electricity Market Act shall regulate the function of the electricity market, and the law on electrical installations contains provisions on network concession and on electrical installations laid out within the area of traffic routes. The two new laws replace the current Electricity Act. Among other things: new terminology shall be introduced to adapt Swedish law to EU law and to clarify that companies conducting network operations have a system responsibility the tasks related to operational security of the national electricity system which have hitherto been performed by a system-responsible authority shall instead be performed by the one holding the transmission system the provisions on designated electricity agreements shall be removed and replaced with a system with a delivery-obliged final customer supplier. The laws start to apply on 1 July 2027 regarding delivery-obliged final customer suppliers and otherwise on 1 January 2027.

Counter-proposals

Plan vs actual vote

Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.

VVänsterpartietNoNofollows the plannot addressed

The plan states that the state can play important roles in keeping companies' pricing at a reasonable level and that electricity is infrastructure where prices should be based on socio-economic goals.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan states that the state can play important roles in keeping companies' pricing at a reasonable level and that electricity is infrastructure where prices should be based on socio-economic goals. A regular procurement of assigned electricity trading company that presses prices and guarantees electricity supply addresses that, while a requirement that the customer themselves actively sign contracts affects the most vulnerable. The plan also points out privatization as the cause of higher electricity prices.

Original (Swedish)

Planen slår fast att staten kan spela viktiga roller för att hålla företagens prissättning på en rimlig nivå och att el är infrastruktur där priser ska utgå från samhällsekonomiska mål. En regelbunden upphandling av anvisat elhandelsföretag som pressar priserna och garanterar elleverans svarar mot det, medan ett krav på att kunden själv aktivt tecknar avtal drabbar de mest utsatta. Planen pekar dessutom ut privatiseringen som orsak till dyrare elpriser.

  • the state keeps prices downdecisive»Staten kan också spela viktiga roller för att hålla företagens« (party programme ↗)“The state can also play important roles in keeping companies'”
  • electricity as societally managed infrastructure»investeringar och priser behöver utgå från samhällsekonomiska mål.« (party programme ↗)“investments and prices need to be based on socio-economic goals.”
  • privatization brought higher electricity»Privatiseringar har lett till dyrare elpris« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Privatizations have led to higher electricity prices”
SSocialdemokraternaNoNofollows the planderived

The plan requires low and fair energy prices throughout the country and prevention of unfair pricing, and wants to support those most affected by price increases.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan requires low and fair energy prices throughout the country and prevention of unfair pricing, and wants to support those most affected by price increases. A procured assignment model that presses down prices and guarantees electricity supply protects precisely those electricity customers who do not actively enter into contracts. The plan also establishes that society shall intervene when the market does not function for households.

Original (Swedish)

Planen kräver låga och rättvisa energipriser i hela landet och förhindrande av oskälig prissättning, och vill stötta dem som drabbas hårdast av prisökningar. En upphandlad anvisningsmodell som pressar priserna och garanterar elleverans skyddar just de elkunder som inte aktivt tecknar avtal. Planen slår också fast att samhället ska gripa in när marknaden inte fungerar för hushållen.

  • low and fair electricity pricesdecisive»Låga och rättvisa energipriser i hela landet.« (party programme ↗)“Low and fair energy prices throughout the country.”
  • stop to unfair pricing»Förhindrande av priskarteller och oskälig prissättning.« (party programme ↗)“Prevention of price cartels and unfair pricing.”
  • support to vulnerable households»Stöd till de som drabbas hårdast av prisökningarna.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Support for those most affected by price increases.”
  • equal conditions for households»Ekonomiska och praktiska möjligheter för omställning för alla, oavsett egna resurser.« (party programme ↗)“Economic and practical possibilities for transition for everyone, regardless of own resources.”
MPMiljöpartietNoNofollows the plannot addressed

The counter-proposal wants regular procurement of assigned electricity trading companies to drive down prices and guarantee electricity supply to vulnerable customers.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The counter-proposal wants regular procurement of assigned electricity trading companies to drive down prices and guarantee electricity supply to vulnerable customers. The plan states that the state shall ensure regulations that allow markets to function and that insufficient competition hurts ordinary households, and that the energy system shall provide low prices for households. Households with small margins shall be especially supported in the transition.

Original (Swedish)

Motförslaget vill ha regelbunden upphandling av anvisat elhandelsföretag för att pressa priserna och garantera elleverans till utsatta kunder. Planen slår fast att staten ska säkerställa regelverk som får marknader att fungera och att bristande konkurrens går ut över vanliga hushåll, samt att energisystemet ska ge låga priser för hushållen. Hushåll med små marginaler ska särskilt stöttas i omställningen.

  • regulation protects householdsdecisive»präglas av privata monopol och bristande konkurrens. Det går ut över vanliga hushåll och« (party programme ↗)“characterised by private monopolies and insufficient competition. This hurts ordinary households and”
  • the state shapes market rules»Staten ska säkerställa att det finns regelverk och institutioner som ser till att marknader« (party programme ↗)“The state shall ensure that there are regulations and institutions that see to it that markets”
  • low electricity prices for households»energisystem som kan leverera el dygnet runt, året om – till låga priser för hushåll och« (party programme ↗)“energy system that can deliver electricity day and night, year round – at low prices for households and”
  • vulnerable households shall be supported»Alla ska kunna vara med i omställningen. Miljöpartiet vill driva en politik som gör att de« (party programme ↗)“Everyone shall be able to take part in the transition. The Greens want to drive a policy that means that”
CCenterpartietNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The plan wants to dampen prices through better competition and particularly highlights the need for measures that mitigate the worst effects for households with small margins.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan wants to dampen prices through better competition and particularly highlights the need for measures that mitigate the worst effects for households with small margins. Regular procurement of assigned electricity retail company is a competition mechanism that presses the price while electricity supply is guaranteed for those who do not sign contracts. The plan's strong emphasis on choice pulls the other way, which makes the assessment uncertain.

Original (Swedish)

Planen vill dämpa priserna genom bättre konkurrens och lyfter särskilt behovet av insatser som mildrar de värsta effekterna för hushåll med små marginaler. En regelbunden upphandling av anvisat elhandelsföretag är en konkurrensmekanism som pressar priset samtidigt som elleveransen garanteras för dem som inte tecknar avtal. Planens starka betoning av valfrihet drar åt andra hållet, vilket gör bedömningen osäker.

  • competition presses pricesdecisive»Genom att skapa friare marknader och förbättra konkurrensen kan vi dämpa priserna ytterligare.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“By creating freer markets and improving competition we can dampen prices further.”
  • protect those with small margins»För att möta detta krävs insatser som mildrar inflationens värsta effekter för dem med små marginaler.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“To address this requires measures that mitigate inflation's worst effects for those with small margins.”
  • competition as driving force»Konkurrens är en viktig drivkraft för utvecklingen av marknadsekonomin.« (party programme ↗)“Competition is an important driving force for market economy development.”
  • choice»Valfriheten är en viktig princip och en nyckel för att förena frihet med rättvisa.« (party programme ↗)“Choice is an important principle and a key to combining freedom with justice.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

LLiberalernaNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The plan wants to strengthen the individual's position in everyday contracts through improved consumer and contract legislation and assumes that the consumer shall have knowledge and power to make well-informed decisions.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan wants to strengthen the individual's position in everyday contracts through improved consumer and contract legislation and assumes that the consumer shall have knowledge and power to make well-informed decisions. A regularly procured assigned electricity supplier protects precisely those customers who do not make an active choice and simultaneously presses prices, in line with the plan's view of procurement as a way to press costs. The plan, however, does not address assigned electricity contracts.

Original (Swedish)

Planen vill stärka den enskildes ställning i vardagens avtal genom förbättrad konsument- och avtalslagstiftning och utgår från att konsumenten ska ha kunskap och makt att fatta välinformerade beslut. En regelbundet upphandlad anvisad elleverantör skyddar just de kunder som inte gör ett aktivt val och pressar samtidigt priset, i linje med planens syn på upphandling som ett sätt att pressa kostnader. Planen behandlar dock inte anvisade elavtal.

  • strengthened consumer powerdecisive»Den enskildes inflytande över de avtal som ingås i vardagen behöver stärkas genom förbättrad konsument- och avtalslagstiftning.« (party programme ↗)“The individual's influence over everyday contracts needs to be strengthened through improved consumer and contract legislation.”
  • informed consumers»I en fungerande marknadsekonomi har konsumenten kunskap och makt att fatta välinformerade beslut.« (party programme ↗)“In a functioning market economy, the consumer has knowledge and power to make well-informed decisions.”
  • procurement presses costs»Offentlig upphandling ska ske på sätt som ger skattebetalarna låga kostnader, hög kvalitet, säkrar likabehandling och stimulerar konkurrens.« (party programme ↗)“Public procurement shall be conducted in a way that gives taxpayers low costs, high quality, ensures equal treatment, and stimulates competition.”
  • lower electricity costs for households»Vi vill både sänka elmomsen och den särskilda extraskatten på el för att mildra elprischocken här och nu.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to both lower the VAT on electricity and the special extra tax on electricity to mitigate the electricity price shock here and now.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

KDKristdemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan wants to protect households against high electricity prices and particularly points to those affected by electricity poverty.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan wants to protect households against high electricity prices and particularly points to those affected by electricity poverty. A procurement model that presses prices while simultaneously guaranteeing electricity delivery to customers who do not actively enter an agreement serves that purpose, and increased competition is according to the plan to customers' benefit. The documents however say nothing about the design of the assignment model.

Original (Swedish)

Planen vill skydda hushållen mot höga elpriser och lyfter särskilt dem som drabbats av elfattigdom. En upphandlingsmodell som pressar priserna och samtidigt garanterar elleverans till kunder som inte aktivt tecknar avtal tjänar det syftet, och ökad konkurrens är enligt planen till nytta för kunderna. Dokumenten säger dock inget om anvisningsmodellens utformning.

  • protection against high electricity pricesdecisive»i elskatten så att den sänks om elpriserna ökar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“in the electricity tax so that it is lowered if electricity prices rise.”
  • value vulnerable electricity customers»Vi ser den som drabbats av elfattigdom och som tvingades ha ytterjackan på sig hemma i vintras för att uppvärmningen blivit för dyr.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We see those affected by electricity poverty and who were forced to have an outer jacket on at home in winter because heating became too expensive.”
  • competition benefits customers»och internationell energimarknad med ökad konkurrens är till nytta för kunderna.« (party programme ↗)“and international energy market with increased competition is to customers' benefit.”
  • oversight of price formation»Prisbildningen och marknadens funktionssätt behöver samtidigt hållas under kontinuerlig« (party programme ↗)“Price formation and the market's functioning must meanwhile be kept under continuous”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

MModeraternaYesYesfollows the plannot addressed

The plan says nothing about how assigned electricity contracts shall be designed.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan says nothing about how assigned electricity contracts shall be designed. Its closest underlying principle is market economy and freedom of contract, while the chosen method to protect vulnerable electricity customers is targeted high-cost protection and a review of electricity price zones. A state-procured assigned electricity supplier lies outside that line. The position is derived and uncertain.

Original (Swedish)

Planen säger inget om hur anvisade elavtal ska utformas. Dess närmast liggande princip är marknadsekonomi och avtalsfrihet, medan den valda metoden för att skydda utsatta elkunder är ett riktat högkostnadsskydd och en översyn av elprisområdena. En statligt upphandlad anvisad elleverantör ligger utanför den linjen. Ställningstagandet är härlett och osäkert.

  • market economy and freedom of contractdecisive»Grunden för Sveriges välstånd är en marknadsekonomi baserad« (party programme ↗)“The foundation for Sweden's prosperity is a market economy based”
  • targeted protection for households»Skydda hushållen mot vinterns elräkningar genom ett högkostnadsskydd« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Protect households against winter electricity bills through a high-cost protection scheme”
  • review of electricity price zones»Se över elprisområdenas utformning« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Review the design of electricity price zones”
SDSverigedemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The party programme is pragmatic about the form of delivery and decides the issue based on greatest possible benefit to the lowest possible cost, and wants electricity distribution to be under strong societal control.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The party programme is pragmatic about the form of delivery and decides the issue based on greatest possible benefit to the lowest possible cost, and wants electricity distribution to be under strong societal control. A procured referral model that presses prices and guarantees electricity supply to vulnerable customers aligns with the requirement for affordable and reliable energy for households. The plan therefore supports the counter-proposal's demand.

Original (Swedish)

Partiprogrammet är pragmatiskt om utförandeform och avgör frågan utifrån största möjliga nytta till lägsta möjliga kostnad, samt vill att eldistributionen står under stark samhällskontroll. En upphandlad anvisningsmodell som pressar priserna och garanterar elleverans till utsatta kunder ligger i linje med kravet på prisvärd och tillförlitlig energi för hushållen. Planen ger därför stöd åt motförslagets krav.

  • benefit at lowest costdecisive»Det viktigaste för oss är i de flesta fall inte vem som utför en specifik uppgift utan att uppgiften utförs på ett sätt som renderar medborgarna största möjliga nytta till lägsta möjliga kostnad.« (party programme ↗)“What is most important to us in most cases is not who performs a specific task but that the task is performed in a way that provides citizens with the greatest possible benefit at the lowest possible cost.”
  • affordable and reliable electricity»vill Sverigedemokraterna föra en energipolitik som säkerställer en prisvärd och tillförlitlig energiförsörjning för såväl hushåll som näringsliv« (party programme ↗)“want Sweden-democrats to conduct an energy policy that ensures an affordable and reliable energy supply for both households and businesses”
  • societal control over electricity distribution»Även andra sektorer av central strategisk och säkerhetspolitisk betydelse, såsom el- och vattendistributionen, bör stå under stark samhällskontroll.« (party programme ↗)“Other sectors of central strategic and security-political importance, such as electricity and water distribution, should be under strong societal control.”
  • lower electricity cost for households»Sänka skatten på elenergi permanent för att underlätta elektrifieringen« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Lower the tax on electricity permanently to facilitate electrification”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

Share and embed

Embed as a widget (iframe): previewSizeLanguage

Sources and documents

Documents under consideration

Source: The Swedish Parliament