2025-05-142024/25:UU7 · p.1UUForeign affairs
International cooperation
Sweden's global engagement and multilateral cooperation
What's at stake: The decision affects how Sweden balances support for Ukraine and the transatlantic relationship against a broader global engagement, for example in the UN and with countries in Africa, Asia and Latin America. It affects Sweden's role and reputation on issues such as peacebuilding, human rights, disarmament and the climate transition, and its ability to meet cross-border challenges through international cooperation.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether Swedish foreign policy has become too one-sidedly focused on the near region and Europe and therefore needs a more active global and multilateral orientation, or whether the current focus on the near region alongside continued global engagement through the UN and partnerships is the right priority.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee endorses the government giving the near region top priority in foreign and security policy and making support for Ukraine its foremost task, while agreeing that Europe needs to take greater responsibility for its own security. It notes that Sweden at the same time has an unwavering global engagement and welcomes the government continuing to work in the UN through alliance-building and strengthening partnerships with countries in Africa, Asia and Latin America, and upholding core values such as democracy, human rights and gender equality in foreign policy. The committee therefore rejects the motions for a more active foreign policy.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 1 (S)
The reservation (S) argues that the government has stepped back from the global stage and made Swedish foreign policy passive and provincial through a one-eyed focus on the near region and Europe, risking isolation and damaging Sweden's international reputation in peacebuilding, human rights and the climate transition. It calls for Sweden to return to an active foreign policy that upholds and develops multilateralism and the rules-based world order to address global challenges such as climate change, terrorism and trade.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 1 by S.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have gone the other way
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: LLiberalerna, VVänsterpartiet
Ja 126–93Nej 91–128
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Yes 21/0/0/3 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| S | No | No 0/92/0/14 | match | confidence: high | explicit |
| MP | No | Abstain 0/0/15/3 | differs | confidence: high | explicit |
| C | No | Abstain 0/0/21/3 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
| L | No | Yes 14/0/0/2 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| KD | No | Yes 16/0/0/3 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| M | Yes | Yes 60/0/0/8 | match | confidence: medium | derived |
| SD | Yes | Abstain 15/0/48/9 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
Broke with the party line
| SDBo Broman (SD, Skåne läns västra) | Yes — party line: Abstain |
| SDClara Aranda (SD, Östergötlands län) | Yes — party line: Abstain |
| SDDaniel Persson (SD, Gävleborgs län) | Yes — party line: Abstain |
| SDDavid Perez (SD, Uppsala län) | Yes — party line: Abstain |
| SDErik Hellsborn (SD, Hallands län) | Yes — party line: Abstain |
| SDJonas Andersson (SD, Östergötlands län) | Yes — party line: Abstain |
| SDKatja Nyberg (SD, Kronobergs län) | Yes — party line: Abstain |
| SDLeonid Yurkovskiy (SD, Stockholms län) | Yes — party line: Abstain |
| SDLinda Lindberg (SD, Skåne läns västra) | Yes — party line: Abstain |
| SDMats Hellhoff (SD, Västernorrlands län) | Yes — party line: Abstain |
| SDMattias Bäckström Johansson (SD, Kalmar län) | Yes — party line: Abstain |
| SDMona Olin (SD, Kalmar län) | Yes — party line: Abstain |
| SDPer Söderlund (SD, Örebro län) | Yes — party line: Abstain |
| SDPia Trollehjelm (SD, Skåne läns västra) | Yes — party line: Abstain |
| SDRasmus Giertz (SD, Dalarnas län) | Yes — party line: Abstain |
MPs whose vote differs from their party's majority position in this division. Marked with a dark ring in the chamber view.
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2024/25:1323 by Jacob Risberg et al. (MP) demand 2, 2024/25:1439 by Markus Wiechel et al. (SD) demands 1 and 2, 2024/25:3038 by Daniel Helldén et al. (MP) demand 3, 2024/25:3107 by Morgan Johansson et al. (S) demands 1, 24, 26 and 32, and 2024/25:3162 by Kerstin Lundgren et al. (C) demands 1, 3 and 52.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2024/25:1323 av Jacob Risberg m.fl. (MP) yrkande 2, 2024/25:1439 av Markus Wiechel m.fl. (SD) yrkandena 1 och 2, 2024/25:3038 av Daniel Helldén m.fl. (MP) yrkande 3, 2024/25:3107 av Morgan Johansson m.fl. (S) yrkandena 1, 24, 26 och 32 samt 2024/25:3162 av Kerstin Lundgren m.fl. (C) yrkandena 1, 3 och 52.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag rejected approximately 130 proposals in motions about international relations. The motions were submitted during the general motion period 2024 and concern, among other things, international cooperation, gender equality and women, peace and security, relations with China and consular matters.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants Sweden to continue pursuing an active and international foreign policy through multilateral cooperation. (S) — Reservation 1
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan requires Sweden to be a voice for peace and justice in the world, increase aid and strengthen the UN, and for the UN to have a greater role in world politics.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires Sweden to be a voice for peace and justice in the world, increase aid and strengthen the UN, and for the UN to have a greater role in world politics. The counter-proposal's demand for a return to an active foreign policy that values multilateralism and the rule-based order is the same commitment. The plan also places international solidarity high and wants Sweden to participate wholeheartedly in climate transition and poverty reduction work.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att Sverige är en röst för fred och rättvisa i världen, ökar biståndet och stärker FN, och att FN får en större roll i världspolitiken. Motförslagets krav på en återgång till en aktiv utrikespolitik som värnar multilateralismen och den regelbaserade ordningen är samma åtagande. Planen sätter dessutom den internationella solidariteten högt och vill att Sverige deltar helhjärtat i arbetet med klimatomställning och fattigdomsbekämpning.
- strengthened UN and aiddecisive»Vänsterpartiet anser att Sverige ska vara en röst för fred och rättvisa, inte för ökad militarisering. Sverige ska öka biståndet, stärka FN och skriva under kärnvapenkonventionen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Left Party believes that Sweden should be a voice for peace and justice, not for increased militarization. Sweden should increase aid, strengthen the UN and sign the nuclear weapons convention.”
- UN as central arena»Vi vill därför att Sverige verkar för att FN ska spela en större roll« (party programme ↗)“We therefore want Sweden to work for the UN to play a greater role”
- wholehearted global engagement»Vi vill att Sverige ska vara ett land som deltar helhjärtat i arbetet med« (party programme ↗)“We want Sweden to be a country that participates wholeheartedly in”
- international solidarity»Därför är vi en rörelse som sätter den internationella solidariteten högt på dagordningen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Therefore we are a movement that places international solidarity high on the agenda.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The election manifesto establishes that Sweden must be a strong global voice and continue to protect the role of the UN for international law and international cooperation, which is precisely the active and multilateral line the counter-proposal demands.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto establishes that Sweden must be a strong global voice and continue to protect the role of the UN for international law and international cooperation, which is precisely the active and multilateral line the counter-proposal demands. The party programme charges Sweden to play an active role as a mediator and bridge-builder in international conflicts. Work for a rules-based world order is an explicit commitment in the manifesto.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet slår fast att Sverige ska vara en stark global röst och fortsätta värna FN:s roll för folkrätten och det internationella samarbetet, vilket är precis den aktiva och multilaterala linje motförslaget kräver. Partiprogrammet ålägger Sverige att spela en aktiv roll som medlare och brobyggare i internationella konflikter. Arbetet för en regelbaserad världsordning är ett uttalat åtagande i manifestet.
- strong global voicedecisive»Sverige ska vara en stark global röst.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden must be a strong global voice.”
- protect the UN and international law»Vi kommer att fortsätta värna FN:s roll i arbetet för folkrätten och det internationella samarbetet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We will continue to protect the role of the UN in the work for international law and international cooperation.”
- active foreign policy»Sverige ska fortsätta att spela en aktiv roll som medlare, brobyggare och samtalspartner vid« (party programme ↗)“Sweden must continue to play an active role as a mediator, bridge-builder and conversation partner in”
- rules-based world order»Vi kommer att fortsätta arbetet för att öka respekten för de mänskliga rättigheterna, demokratin och en regelbaserad världsordning och global säkerhet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We will continue working to increase respect for human rights, democracy and a rules-based world order and global security.”
The plan wants to see strong international cooperation with the UN as a central actor for peace and human rights, and explicitly warns that common foreign policy becomes an excuse for passive Swedish policy.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to see strong international cooperation with the UN as a central actor for peace and human rights, and explicitly warns that common foreign policy becomes an excuse for passive Swedish policy. A return to an active foreign policy that values multilateralism and the rules-based order is thus the plan's own line. The plan also emphasises global responsibility through aid and feminist foreign policy.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill se ett starkt internationellt samarbete med FN som central aktör för fred och mänskliga rättigheter, och varnar uttryckligen för att den gemensamma utrikespolitiken blir en ursäkt för en passiv svensk politik. En återgång till en aktiv utrikespolitik som värnar multilateralismen och den regelbaserade ordningen är därmed planens egen linje. Planen betonar också globalt ansvar genom bistånd och feministisk utrikespolitik.
- UN-centred cooperationdecisive»vill se ett starkt internationellt samarbete med FN som central aktör för fred« (party programme ↗)“wants to see strong international cooperation with the UN as a central actor for peace”
- against passive foreign policy»den gemensamma utrikespolitiken får inte bli en ursäkt för en passiv svensk politik« (party programme ↗)“common foreign policy must not become an excuse for passive Swedish policy”
- active feminist foreign policy»utveckla och förstärka Sveriges feministiska utrikes- och utvecklingspolitik.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“develop and strengthen Sweden's feminist foreign and development policy.”
- global responsibility through aid»att mer än 1 procent av Sveriges bruttonationalinkomst fortsatt ska gå till bistånd« (2022 manifesto ↗)“that more than 1 per cent of Sweden's gross national income continues to go to aid”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan establishes that common challenges like tariff barriers, the climate question and international crime can only be solved through international cooperation, and that Sweden needs more free trade and international cooperation rather than closed borders.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that common challenges like tariff barriers, the climate question and international crime can only be solved through international cooperation, and that Sweden needs more free trade and international cooperation rather than closed borders. An active foreign policy that values multilateralism and the rule-based order follows from that commitment. The plan therefore supports the counter-proposal's demand.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att gemensamma utmaningar som tullmurar, klimatfrågan och internationell brottslighet bara kan lösas genom internationellt samarbete, och att Sverige behöver mer frihandel och internationellt samarbete snarare än stängda gränser. En aktiv utrikespolitik som värnar multilateralismen och den regelbaserade ordningen följer av det åtagandet. Planen stödjer därför motförslagets krav.
- global challenges require cooperationdecisive»Utmaningar som är gemensamma för många nationer, som tullmurar, klimatfrågan och internationell brottslighet, kan bara lösas genom internationellt samarbete.« (party programme ↗)“Challenges that are common to many nations, such as tariff barriers, the climate question and international crime, can only be solved through international cooperation.”
- more international cooperation»Sverige behöver mer frihandel och internationellt samarbete, inte protektionism och stängda gränser.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden needs more free trade and international cooperation, not protectionism and closed borders.”
- global responsibility»Fred, skyddet av mänskliga rättigheter och hållbar utveckling är hela världens ansvar.« (party programme ↗)“Peace, protection of human rights and sustainable development are the responsibility of the whole world.”
- openness to the world»Sverige behöver också ett politiskt ledarskap som ser resten av världen som en möjlighet, inte som ett hot« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden also needs political leadership that sees the rest of the world as an opportunity, not as a threat”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan states that defence of democracy far beyond Europe's borders shall always form the foundation for Sweden's and the EU's foreign policy, and that Sweden shall do much more both as an individual country and within international cooperation.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan states that defence of democracy far beyond Europe's borders shall always form the foundation for Sweden's and the EU's foreign policy, and that Sweden shall do much more both as an individual country and within international cooperation. That is exactly the counter-proposal's requirement for an active foreign policy instead of a one-sided focus on the neighbourhood. The plan also gives the UN a special position as a global actor and states that the climate challenge can only be met through cooperation in Europe and globally.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att försvaret av demokratin även långt bortom Europas gränser alltid ska utgöra grunden för Sveriges och EU:s utrikespolitik, och att Sverige ska göra mycket mer både som enskilt land och inom internationella samarbeten. Det är precis motförslagets krav på en aktiv utrikespolitik i stället för ett ensidigt fokus på närområdet. Planen ger också FN en särställning som global aktör och slår fast att klimatutmaningen bara kan mötas genom samarbete i Europa och globalt.
- democracy beyond Europe's bordersdecisive»Och vi är rösten för att försvaret av demokratin – även långt bortom Europas gränser – alltid ska utgöra grunden för Sveriges och EU:s utrikespolitik.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“And we are the voice for the defence of democracy – even far beyond Europe's borders – shall always form the foundation for Sweden's and the EU's foreign policy.”
- more international engagement»Därför vill vi att Sverige gör mycket mer, både som enskilt land och inom internationella samarbeten, för fri- och rättigheter, frihandel, fria val och samarbete i den fria världen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Therefore we want Sweden to do much more, both as an individual country and within international cooperation, for freedom and rights, free trade, free choices and cooperation in the free world.”
- UN as global actor»Förenta nationerna (FN) har en särställning som den viktigaste globala aktören för fred och« (party programme ↗)“The United Nations (UN) has a special position as the most important global actor for peace and”
- global climate cooperation»EU är världens viktigaste miljöorganisation – det är bara genom samarbete i Europa och globalt som klimatutmaningen kan mötas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The EU is the world's most important environmental organization – it is only through cooperation in Europe and globally that the climate challenge can be met.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan sets the goal of deepening peace-building in the neighboring region, in Europe and in the rest of the world, and requires that the UN's position and compliance with international obligations are protected and strengthened.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan sets the goal of deepening peace-building in the neighboring region, in Europe and in the rest of the world, and requires that the UN's position and compliance with international obligations are protected and strengthened. The counter-proposal's requirement for an active foreign policy that values multilateralism and the rule-based world order follows from these commitments. The plan's statement that Sweden cannot remain neutral if neighboring countries are attacked does however qualify the prioritization of the neighboring region.
Original (Swedish)
Planen sätter målet att fördjupa fredsuppbyggnaden i närområdet, i Europa och i övriga världen, och kräver att FN:s ställning och efterlevnaden av internationella förpliktelser skyddas och stärks. Motförslagets krav på en aktiv utrikespolitik som värnar multilateralismen och den regelbaserade världsordningen följer av dessa åtaganden. Planens konstaterande att Sverige inte kan stå neutralt om grannländer anfalls kvalificerar dock prioriteringen av närområdet.
- strengthened UN and international lawdecisive»Om de mänskliga rättigheterna ska stärkas måste efterlevandet av internationella förpliktelser garanteras. Därför måste FN:s ställning skyddas och stärkas,« (party programme ↗)“If human rights are to be strengthened, compliance with international obligations must be guaranteed. Therefore, the UN's position must be protected and strengthened,”
- peace work also globally»Målet är att fördjupa fredsuppbyggnaden i vårt närområde, i Europa samt i övriga världen.« (party programme ↗)“The goal is to deepen peace-building in our neighboring region, in Europe and in the rest of the world.”
- value-based foreign policy»Svensk utrikespolitik ska främja fred, frihet, demokrati och utveckling samt mänskliga rättigheter, förståelse och försoning.« (party programme ↗)“Swedish foreign policy shall promote peace, freedom, democracy and development as well as human rights, understanding and reconciliation.”
- neighboring region's security»Vi kan inte stå neutrala om våra grannländer anfalls.« (party programme ↗)“We cannot remain neutral if our neighboring countries are attacked.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan explicitly prioritises the neighbouring region: the relationship with the Nordic and Baltic neighbours has special standing, EU cooperation is the core of Sweden's international engagement and foreign policy should protect Swedish interests.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan explicitly prioritises the neighbouring region: the relationship with the Nordic and Baltic neighbours has special standing, EU cooperation is the core of Sweden's international engagement and foreign policy should protect Swedish interests. It also wants to focus efforts where they do the most good and reform the UN rather than broaden engagement. The counter-proposal's requirement for a broader, more multilaterally oriented foreign policy therefore goes against the plan's prioritisation.
Original (Swedish)
Planen prioriterar uttryckligen närområdet: relationen till de nordiska och baltiska grannländerna har en särställning, EU-samarbetet är kärnan i Sveriges internationella engagemang och utrikespolitiken ska värna svenska intressen. Den vill dessutom fokusera insatserna dit de gör störst nytta och reformera FN snarare än att bredda engagemanget. Motförslagets krav på en bredare, mer multilateralt inriktad utrikespolitik går därför emot planens prioritering.
- neighbouring region in special positiondecisive»Relationen till våra nordiska och baltiska grannländer har en« (party programme ↗)“The relationship to our Nordic and Baltic neighbours has”
- Swedish interests guideweak support»Svensk utrikespolitik ska värna svenska intressen.« (party programme ↗)“Swedish foreign policy should protect Swedish interests.”
- EU as the core»EU-samarbetet är kärnan i Sveriges ekonomiska och politiska internationella engagemang« (party programme ↗)“EU cooperation is the core of Sweden's economic and political international engagement”
- focus over breadth»Fokusera det svenska biståndet till de länder, organisationer och tematiska områden där det gör störst nytta« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Focus Swedish aid on the countries, organisations and thematic areas where it does the most good”
flags: citat_svagt
The plan states that Sweden is in descending order part of a Nordic, European, Western and global community and that foreign policy should primarily safeguard Swedish interests and the independence of Swedish self-governance.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan states that Sweden is in descending order part of a Nordic, European, Western and global community and that foreign policy should primarily safeguard Swedish interests and the independence of Swedish self-governance. A return to an active policy that develops multilateralism and the rules-based international order as the main direction goes in the opposite direction from this prioritization of the local area. The plan therefore argues against the counter-proposal's demands.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att Sverige i fallande ordning är en del av en nordisk, europeisk, västerländsk och global gemenskap och att utrikespolitiken främst ska värna svenska intressen och det svenska folkstyrets oberoende. En återgång till en aktiv politik som utvecklar multilateralismen och den regelbaserade världsordningen som huvudspår går i motsatt riktning mot denna prioritering av närområdet. Planen talar därför emot motförslagets krav.
- local area firstdecisive»Sverigedemokraterna betraktar Sverige som, i fallande ordning, en del av en nordisk, europeisk, västerländsk och global gemenskap.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden-democrats regard Sweden as, in descending order, part of a Nordic, European, Western and global community.”
- focus on local area»Rusta Sverige inför en ny säkerhetspolitisk situation i vårt närområde« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Arm Sweden for a new geopolitical situation in our local area”
- self-governance independence»Bejaka och stärka det svenska folkstyrets oberoende« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Support and strengthen the independence of Swedish self-governance”
- Swedish interests»Värna svenska intressen i internationella sammanhang« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Safeguard Swedish interests in international contexts”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2024/25:UU7)
- Committee report full text (HC01UU7)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2024/25:1042 — Kinas felaktiga tolkning av resolution 2758 och Taiwans representation i FN-systemet av Magnus Berntsson (KD)
- Motion 2024/25:1166 — Estonias last under förlisningsnatten av Mikael Oscarsson (KD)
- Motion 2024/25:1192 — Kinas ökande makt av Anne-Li Sjölund och Niels Paarup-Petersen (båda C)
- Motion 2024/25:1274 — Om behovet av en ny politik gentemot Taiwan av Mathias Tegnér m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2024/25:1323 — Värnande av folkrätten av Jacob Risberg m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2024/25:1430 — Vissa frågor i Mellanöstern och Afrika av Markus Wiechel m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1431 — Vissa Asienfrågor av Markus Wiechel m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1433 — Säkerhetspolitik av Aron Emilsson m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1438 — Internationella relationer och mänskliga rättigheter av Markus Wiechel m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1439 — Ett ökat svenskt internationellt inflytande av Markus Wiechel m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1440 — En ny och skärpt Kinapolitik av Aron Emilsson m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1637 — Frigivande av Dawit Isaak av Lawen Redar (S)
- Motion 2024/25:1638 — Frigivande av Gui Minhai av Lawen Redar (S)
- Motion 2024/25:1712 — Solidaritet av Jamal El-Haj (-)
- Motion 2024/25:1723 — Ett land i förändring av Jamal El-Haj (-)
- Motion 2024/25:1730 — Utredning avseende Raoul Wallenbergs försvinnande av Magnus Oscarsson och Mikael Oscarsson (båda KD)
- Motion 2024/25:1732 — Ny utredning om Raoul Wallenbergs öde av Mikael Oscarsson (KD)
- Motion 2024/25:1738 — Frisläppande av Dawit Isaak av Magnus Oscarsson (KD)
- Motion 2024/25:1739 — Nya fynd kring Dag Hammarskjölds död av Gudrun Brunegård (KD)
- Motion 2024/25:1802 — Enprocentsmålet i biståndet av Annika Strandhäll (S)
Source: The Swedish Parliament