2026-05-262025/26:JuU28 · p.1JuUJustice

Government's legislative proposal

The government's legislative proposal on police use of real-time AI facial recognition

What's at stake: Adoption would give police a powerful new tool for analyzing images and identifying people in public spaces to fight serious crime, but it entails restrictions on rights for a potentially large number of people and raises questions about whether adequate legal safeguards, oversight, and avenues for appeal are in place.

Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.

What the vote decides

The question is whether the Riksdag should adopt the government's legislative proposal giving the Police Authority and, in some cases, the Security Service the power to use real-time AI facial-recognition systems to fight crime, or whether the proposal should be rejected as too far-reaching an intrusion on personal privacy.

Yes Yes — the committee proposal

The committee shares the government's assessment that law-enforcement authorities need effective tools to reverse the trend in crime, agrees that the regulation strikes a reasonable balance between crime-fighting and the protection of personal privacy, with requirements for authorization, notification, and proportionality, and therefore supports the government's legislative proposal.

No No — the reservations

Reservation 1 (C)

The reservation holds that the proposal goes considerably further than necessary and involves an intrusion on personal privacy that conflicts with the constitution and the European Convention on Human Rights, that decision-making power which under the Instrument of Government should rest with parliament is shifted to courts and prosecutors, that genuine avenues for appeal are missing, and that oversight is heavily curtailed, and therefore wants the legislative proposal rejected in full.

Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.

VSMPCLKDMSD
YesNoAbstainAbsent

What do the votes mean here?

Yes The committee proposal: adopting the government's legislative proposal and rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).

No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 1 by C.

Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.

What each plan points to — and how the party voted

For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.

PlanVoteConfidenceEvidence
VNoYes 19/1/0/1departs from the planconfidence: highderived
SYesYes 106/0/0/0follows the planconfidence: mediumderived
MPNoYes 18/0/0/0departs from the planconfidence: mediumderived
Cown reservationNoNo 0/24/0/0follows the planconfidence: mediumderived
LYesYes 16/0/0/0follows the planconfidence: highderived
KDYesYes 19/0/0/0follows the planconfidence: mediumderived
MYesYes 64/0/0/2follows the planconfidence: mediumderived
SDYesYes 69/0/0/1follows the planconfidence: highderived

Broke with the party line

VJessica Wetterling (V, Västra Götalands läns västra)No — party line: Yes

MPs whose vote differs from their party's majority position in this division. Marked with a dark ring in the chamber view.

Committee proposal

The Riksdag adopts the Government's proposal for 1. an act on the use of AI systems for real-time facial recognition for crime prevention purposes, 2. an act on amendments to the act (2026:000) on the use of AI systems for real-time facial recognition for crime prevention purposes, 3. an act on amendments to the act (1957:668) on extradition for crimes, 4. an act on amendments to the act (2000:562) on international legal assistance in criminal matters, 5. an act on amendments to the act (2003:1156) on surrender from Sweden under a European arrest warrant, 6. an act on amendments to the Public Access to Information and Secrecy Act (2009:400), 7. an act on amendments to the act (2011:1165) on surrender from Sweden under a Nordic arrest warrant, 8. an act on amendments to the act (2017:1000) on a European investigation order, 9. an act on amendments to the act (2021:709) with supplementary provisions on criminal cooperation between the European Union and the United Kingdom. Thereby the Riksdag approves Government Bill 2025/26:150 points 1-9 and rejects motion 2025/26:3956 by Ulrika Liljeberg et al. (C).

Original (Swedish)

Riksdagen antar regeringens förslag till 1. lag om användning av AI-system för ansiktsigenkänning i realtid för brottsbekämpande ändamål, 2. lag om ändring i lagen (2026:000) om användning av AI-system för ansiktsigenkänning i realtid för brottsbekämpande ändamål, 3. lag om ändring i lagen (1957:668) om utlämning för brott, 4. lag om ändring i lagen (2000:562) om internationell rättslig hjälp i brottmål, 5. lag om ändring i lagen (2003:1156) om överlämnande från Sverige enligt en europeisk arresteringsorder, 6. lag om ändring i offentlighets- och sekretesslagen (2009:400), 7. lag om ändring i lagen (2011:1165) om överlämnande från Sverige enligt en nordisk arresteringsorder, 8. lag om ändring i lagen (2017:1000) om en europeisk utredningsorder, 9. lag om ändring i lagen (2021:709) med kompletterande bestämmelser om straffrättsligt samarbete mellan Europeiska unionen och Förenade kungariket. Därmed bifaller riksdagen proposition 2025/26:150 punkterna 1-9 och avslår motion 2025/26:3956 av Ulrika Liljeberg m.fl. (C).

Riksdag decision: The Riksdag approved the Government's proposal to give the Police Authority the opportunity to use AI technology for real-time facial recognition. The proposal means that the Police Authority shall be allowed to use AI technology if it is absolutely necessary to locate or identify a specific person who is suspected of being a victim of human trafficking, trafficking or exploitation or who is missing and suspected of being a victim of a crime if there is an imminent risk that the person will commit a serious crime that poses a danger to another's life or physical safety who may reasonably be suspected of having committed a certain serious crime for which the penalty scale includes imprisonment for four years or more, or such penalty may follow for attempt, preparation or insigation to such crimes, for the purpose of investigating or prosecuting the crime who has been convicted of such a serious crime, for the purpose of implementing the criminal sentence. The use of the technology must be proportionate and permission from a prosecutor or court is required. In urgent cases, however, use may begin without permission, and an application for permission must be made within 24 hours. The new law and other legislative amendments enter into force on 1 July 2026.

Counter-proposals

Plan vs actual vote

Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.

VVänsterpartietNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The plan states that all people have the right to protection of their personal privacy and that the fundamental laws shall protect democracy and people's freedoms and rights, with legal security through transparency and independent oversight.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan states that all people have the right to protection of their personal privacy and that the fundamental laws shall protect democracy and people's freedoms and rights, with legal security through transparency and independent oversight. Real-time surveillance with facial recognition without effective appeal options and with insufficient supervision goes against this, and the election manifesto also warns of discriminatory policing. The plan therefore supports the counter-proposal's demand that the legislation be rejected.

Original (Swedish)

Planen slår fast att alla människor har rätt till skydd av sin personliga integritet och att grundlagarna ska värna demokratin och människors fri- och rättigheter, med rättssäkerhet genom insyn och oberoende granskning. Realtidsövervakning med ansiktsigenkänning utan reella överklagandemöjligheter och med otillräcklig tillsyn går emot det, och valmanifestet varnar dessutom för diskriminerande polisarbete. Planen stöder därför motförslagets krav att lagstiftningen avvisas.

  • protection of personal privacydecisive»har rätt till skydd av sin personliga integritet.« (party programme ↗)“have the right to protection of their personal privacy.”
  • constitutionally protected rights»Grundlagarna ska värna demokratin och människors fri- och« (party programme ↗)“The fundamental laws shall protect democracy and people's freedom and”
  • legal security and oversight»Rättssäkerheten behöver upprätthållas genom rättshjälp, medborgerlig« (party programme ↗)“Legal security needs to be maintained through legal aid, civic”
  • risk of discriminatory surveillance»Många unga, särskilt med utländsk bakgrund, som bor i fattiga områden, utsätts även för rasism och övervåld från polisen« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Many young people, especially with foreign background, who live in poor areas, also face racism and excessive force from the police”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

SSocialdemokraternaYesYesfollows the planderived

The plan wants to give the police more tools and wage an uncompromising fight against serious and organized crime.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan wants to give the police more tools and wage an uncompromising fight against serious and organized crime. Rejecting the legislation on facial recognition entirely would deny the police such a tool. The plan's requirement to protect personal integrity is met through permit review, notification and proportionality requirements rather than through a complete rejection.

Original (Swedish)

Planen vill ge polisen fler verktyg och för en kompromisslös kamp mot den grova och organiserade brottsligheten. Att avvisa lagstiftningen om ansiktsigenkänning i sin helhet skulle förvägra polisen ett sådant verktyg. Planens krav på skydd för den personliga integriteten tillgodoses genom tillståndsprövning, underrättelse och proportionalitetskrav snarare än genom ett totalt avslag.

  • more tools for the policedecisive»Polisen behöver också fler verktyg, som bättre möjligheter till avlyssning och husrannsakan.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The police also need more tools, such as better opportunities for wiretapping and house searches.”
  • combat organized crime»Kraftfullt bekämpande av organiserad kriminell verksamhet.« (party programme ↗)“Vigorous combating of organized criminal activity.”
  • uncompromising crime fighting»Kampen mot kriminaliteten ska vara kompromisslös.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The fight against crime must be uncompromising.”
  • protection of integrity»Skydd för den personliga integriteten.« (party programme ↗)“Protection of personal integrity.”
MPMiljöpartietNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The plan requires that politics actively shapes how AI is used, that risks are managed when powerful technologies are established and that use occurs with respect for fundamental freedoms, rights and integrity.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan requires that politics actively shapes how AI is used, that risks are managed when powerful technologies are established and that use occurs with respect for fundamental freedoms, rights and integrity. Real-time surveillance with facial recognition without real appeal options and with insufficient oversight is in conflict with this. The counter-proposal's requirement to reject the legislation is therefore in line with the plan.

Original (Swedish)

Planen kräver att politiken aktivt formar hur AI används, att riskerna hanteras när kraftfulla tekniker etableras och att användningen sker med respekt för grundläggande fri- och rättigheter och integritet. Realtidsövervakning med ansiktsigenkänning utan reella överklagandemöjligheter och med otillräcklig tillsyn står i strid med det. Motförslagets krav att avvisa lagstiftningen ligger därför i linje med planen.

  • political steering of AIdecisive»Vi i Miljöpartiet anser att politiken måste spela en aktiv roll i hur AI formas och används.« (party programme ↗)“We in the Green Party believe that politics must play an active role in how AI is shaped and used.”
  • risk management for new technology»När nya kraftfulla tekniker etableras måste de risker som finns hanteras.« (party programme ↗)“When new powerful technologies are established, the risks that exist must be managed.”
  • strong oversight protects integrity»Ett sätt att värna integriteten är en stark, oberoende tillsyn över« (party programme ↗)“One way to safeguard integrity is strong, independent oversight of”
  • legal certainty assessment of legislation»prövas noggrant utifrån rättssäkerhet och grundläggande fri- och rättigheter.« (party programme ↗)“must be carefully assessed based on legal certainty and fundamental freedoms and rights.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

CCenterpartietNoNofollows the planderived

The election manifesto explicitly establishes that the rule of law and individuals' rights against the state shall be defended and lists a series of rejected coercive measures, among other things preventive wiretapping.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The election manifesto explicitly establishes that the rule of law and individuals' rights against the state shall be defended and lists a series of rejected coercive measures, among other things preventive wiretapping. Real-time use of facial recognition in public space is the same kind of advance surveillance of the innocent. The party programme additionally demands that all legislation be tested against its integrity impact and that the restriction be proportionate to the purpose. The plan therefore speaks for the counter-proposal's demand to reject the legislation.

Original (Swedish)

Valmanifestet slår uttryckligen fast att rättsstaten och individens rättigheter gentemot staten ska försvaras och räknar upp en rad avvisade tvångsmedel, bland annat preventiv avlyssning. Realtidsanvändning av ansiktsigenkänning i det offentliga rummet är samma slags förhandsövervakning av oskyldiga. Partiprogrammet kräver dessutom att all lagstiftning prövas mot sin integritetspåverkan och att inskränkningen står i proportion till syftet. Planen talar därför för motförslagets krav att avvisa lagstiftningen.

  • no to preventive wiretappingdecisive»Rättsstaten och individens rättigheter gentemot staten måste försvaras. Vi säger därför nej till visitationszoner, kollektiv bestraffning, omvänd bevisbörda, anonyma vittnen, preventiv avlyssning och inskränkningar av religionsfriheten.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The rule of law and individuals' rights against the state must be defended. We therefore say no to search zones, collective punishment, reversed burden of proof, anonymous witnesses, preventive wiretapping and restrictions on freedom of religion.”
  • integrity assessment of legislationweak support»All lagstiftning bör prövas mot dess påverkan på människors personliga integritet.« (party programme ↗)“All legislation should be tested against its impact on people's personal integrity.”
  • proportionality in integrity intrusion»Det måste finnas en proportionalitet mellan lagstiftningens inskränkning av medborgarnas integritet och lagarnas syfte.« (party programme ↗)“There must be proportionality between legislation's restriction of citizens' integrity and the laws' purpose.”
  • action against gang crime»Samhället ska inte vika sig för gängen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Society shall not back down to gangs.”

flags: citat_svagt

LLiberalernaYesYesfollows the planderived

The plan explicitly requires that the police be given more and more modern tools, and that secret coercive measures shall be able to be used in more cases than today to combat gang crime.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan explicitly requires that the police be given more and more modern tools, and that secret coercive measures shall be able to be used in more cases than today to combat gang crime. The counter-proposal instead wants to reject the legislation entirely, which goes directly against this commitment. The plan's integrity requirements are met in the proposal through authorization, notification and proportionality, and therefore do not constitute a reason to reject.

Original (Swedish)

Planen kräver uttryckligen att polisen får fler och modernare verktyg, och att hemliga tvångsmedel ska kunna användas i fler fall än i dag för att bekämpa gängkriminaliteten. Motförslaget vill i stället avvisa lagstiftningen i sin helhet, vilket går tvärtemot detta åtagande. Planens integritetskrav tillgodoses i förslaget genom tillstånd, underrättelse och proportionalitet, och utgör därför inget skäl att avslå.

  • expanded secret coercive measuresdecisive»Avlyssning och andra hemliga tvångsmedel ska kunna användas både vid misstanke om fler brott än i dag och efter domstolsbeslut mot organiserade gängmedlemmar även utan konkret brottsmisstanke.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Wiretapping and other secret coercive measures shall be able to be used both on suspicion of more crimes than today and after court decision against organized gang members even without concrete suspicion of crime.”
  • modern police equipment»För att stoppa upplopp och kravaller ska polisen kunna använda mer effektiv och modern utrustning så att fler kan gripas och lagföras.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“To stop riots and civil disturbances the police shall be able to use more effective and modern equipment so that more can be arrested and prosecuted.”
  • proportionality in integrity intrusions»Åtgärder som påverkar den personliga integriteten negativt är endast berättigade om ett motstående intresse väger uppenbart tyngre och åtgärden är effektiv.« (party programme ↗)“Measures that negatively affect personal integrity are only justified if an opposing interest weighs clearly more heavily and the measure is effective.”
  • regulated camera surveillance»Tydliga regler ska finnas om tillsyn och ansvar vid kamerabevakning på offentlig plats.« (party programme ↗)“Clear rules shall exist regarding supervision and responsibility in camera surveillance in public places.”
KDKristdemokraternaYesYesfollows the planderived

The plan is unambiguous that crime prevention needs new and sharper tools: confidentiality rules shall be reviewed so that authorities can share information, and new methods such as anonymous witnesses are explicitly advocated.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan is unambiguous that crime prevention needs new and sharper tools: confidentiality rules shall be reviewed so that authorities can share information, and new methods such as anonymous witnesses are explicitly advocated. A counter-proposal that wants to reject the legislation in its entirety therefore goes against the plan's line. That privacy protection should be strong argues for the proportionality and authorization requirements that have been built in, not for rejection.

Original (Swedish)

Planen är entydig om att brottsbekämpningen behöver nya och skarpare verktyg: sekretessreglerna ska ses över så att myndigheter kan dela uppgifter, och nya metoder som anonyma vittnen förordas uttryckligen. Ett motförslag som vill avvisa lagstiftningen i sin helhet går därför emot planens linje. Att integritetsskyddet ska vara starkt talar för de proportionalitets- och tillståndskrav som byggts in, inte för avslag.

  • more effective tools against crimedecisive»Total översyn av sekretessreglerna, så att myndigheter kan dela uppgifter mellan sig för att förebygga och klara upp brott.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Comprehensive review of confidentiality rules, so that authorities can share information between them to prevent and clear up crime.”
  • new methods against gang crime»Inför anonyma vittnen. Det finns i flera andra länder och har bidragit till fler fällande domar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Introduce anonymous witnesses. It exists in several other countries and has contributed to more convictions.”
  • effective crime prevention»Tilltron till rättssamhället bygger på att människorna kan förlita sig på att en effektiv brottsbekämpning och en fri och oberoende rättskipning ger trygghet för personlig integritet och egendom.« (party programme ↗)“Trust in the justice system is based on people being able to rely on effective crime prevention and a free and independent judiciary providing security for personal integrity and property.”
  • strong privacy protection»Den personliga integriteten ska ha ett starkt grundlagsskydd« (party programme ↗)“Personal integrity shall have strong constitutional protection”
MModeraternaYesYesfollows the planderived

The plan wants to significantly increase the number of surveillance cameras and adapt legislation so that more gang criminals are held accountable and removed from the streets, in light of the fact that only one of four gang murders was solved.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan wants to significantly increase the number of surveillance cameras and adapt legislation so that more gang criminals are held accountable and removed from the streets, in light of the fact that only one of four gang murders was solved. Real-time analysis with facial recognition is such a tool. The counter-proposal's requirement to reject the legislation in its entirety therefore goes against the plan, despite the fact that the plan also protects personal integrity.

Original (Swedish)

Planen vill kraftigt öka antalet övervakningskameror och anpassa lagstiftningen så att fler gängkriminella ställs till svars och försvinner från gatan, mot bakgrund av att bara ett av fyra gängmord klarades upp. Realtidsanalys med ansiktsigenkänning är ett sådant verktyg. Motförslagets krav på att avvisa lagstiftningen i sin helhet går därför emot planen, trots att planen också värnar den personliga integriteten.

  • expanded camera surveillancedecisive»Kraftigt öka antalet övervakningskameror« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Significantly increase the number of surveillance cameras”
  • adapted legislation against gangs»Gängen är Sveriges inhemska terrorister – och lagstiftningen måste anpassas därefter så att fler ställs till svars och försvinner från gatan.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Gangs are Sweden's domestic terrorists – and legislation must be adapted accordingly so that more are held accountable and disappear from the streets.”
  • low clearance rate for gang murders»Under 2020 klarades endast 1 av 4 av alla gängmord upp.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“In 2020, only 1 of 4 of all gang murders was solved.”
  • security as condition for freedom»Frihet och trygghet går hand i hand.« (party programme ↗)“Freedom and security go hand in hand.”
SDSverigedemokraternaYesYesfollows the planderived

The plan establishes that few political measures are too far-reaching when it comes to push back both the criminal gangs and the culture that allows them to gain foothold and explicitly points out camera surveillance, surveillance and wiretapping as tools that shall be expanded.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan establishes that few political measures are too far-reaching when it comes to push back both the criminal gangs and the culture that allows them to gain foothold and explicitly points out camera surveillance, surveillance and wiretapping as tools that shall be expanded. The counter-proposal wants to reject legislation on facial recognition in real time entirely, which is the direct opposite of that commitment. The plan therefore speaks against the counter-proposal's demands.

Original (Swedish)

Planen slår fast att få politiska åtgärder är för långtgående för att pressa tillbaka de kriminella gängen och pekar uttryckligen ut kameraövervakning, spaning och avlyssning som verktyg som ska byggas ut. Motförslaget vill avvisa lagstiftningen om ansiktsigenkänning i realtid i sin helhet, vilket är raka motsatsen till det åtagandet. Planen talar därför emot motförslagets krav.

  • no measures too far-reachingdecisive»Sverigedemokraterna anser att få politiska åtgärder är för långtgående när det kommer till att pressa tillbaka både de kriminella gängen och den kultur som gör att de får fäste.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden Democrats believe that few political measures are too far-reaching when it comes to push back both the criminal gangs and the culture that allows them to gain foothold.”
  • camera surveillance and surveillance»Åtgärder ska vidtas för att bättre kunna kartlägga gängaktiva genom t.ex. underrättelsearbete och informationsinhämtning, spaning, kameraövervakning och avlyssning.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Measures shall be taken to better map gang-active persons through e.g. intelligence work and information gathering, surveillance, camera surveillance and wiretapping.”
  • tools against gangs»Ge rättsväsendet resurser och verktyg för att bekämpa gängen« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Give the justice system resources and tools to combat gangs.”
  • removed procedural obstacles»Processuella hinder för att möjliggöra en ökad lagföring måste också undanröjas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Procedural obstacles to enabling increased prosecution must also be removed.”

Share and embed

Embed as a widget (iframe): previewSizeLanguage

Sources and documents

Documents under consideration

Source: The Swedish Parliament