2023-12-202023/24:NU1 · p.1NUBusiness & energy
Goals for tourism policy within the Business Policy area
Target for tourism policy
What's at stake: If the target is removed, the visitor industry loses its dedicated parliamentary benchmark, which could affect how policy prioritises a sector that gives many young people and the foreign-born their first job, particularly in rural areas.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the dedicated parliamentary target for tourism policy should be discontinued, as the government proposes, or kept to continue guiding policy for the visitor industry.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee endorses the government's proposal to discontinue the target for tourism policy, for the reasons set out in the government bill.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 1 (S, V)
The reservation (S, V) wants to reject the proposal and keep the target, pointing out that the visitor industry strengthens Sweden's international image, creates rural jobs, and is an important engine for integration since a third of employees are under 26 and four in ten are foreign-born; scrapping the target, in their view, signals far too little ambition for tourism and the visitor industry.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: approving what the committee proposes and rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 1 by S, V.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
What each plan points to — and how the party voted
For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| Plan | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | No 0/21/0/3 | follows the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| S | No | No 0/91/0/16 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| MP | No | Yes 14/1/0/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| C | No | Yes 20/0/0/4 | departs from the plan | confidence: high | not addressed |
| L | Yes | Yes 14/0/0/2 | follows the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| KD | No | Yes 16/0/0/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| M | Yes | Yes 57/0/0/11 | follows the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| SD | No | Yes 62/0/0/10 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
Broke with the party line
| MPEmma Nohrén (MP, Göteborgs kommun) | No — party line: Yes |
MPs whose vote differs from their party's majority position in this division. Marked with a dark ring in the chamber view.
Committee proposal
The Riksdag approves that the goal for tourism policy shall cease to be valid. Thereby the Riksdag approves proposition 2023/24:1 expenditure area 24 point 1 and rejects the motions 2023/24:2325 by Nooshi Dadgostar et al. (V) amendment 2 and 2023/24:2634 by Fredrik Olovsson et al. (S) amendment 2.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen godkänner att målet för turismpolitiken upphör att gälla. Därmed bifaller riksdagen proposition 2023/24:1 utgiftsområde 24 punkt 1 och avslår motionerna 2023/24:2325 av Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V) yrkande 2 och 2023/24:2634 av Fredrik Olovsson m.fl. (S) yrkande 2.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag approved the government's proposal on how the appropriations in the state budget for 2024 within the Business Policy expenditure area should be distributed. In total, this amounts to approximately 9.5 billion kronor from the state budget. The largest amount, approximately 3.5 billion kronor, goes to the Agency for Innovation Systems: research and development. Approximately 834 million kronor goes to the institutes' strategic competence funds and approximately 680 million goes to grants for business development and innovation. Thereby the Riksdag rejected alternative budget proposals in motions. The Riksdag also approved the government's proposal on certain authorizations regarding SAS AB and Almi AB, as well as approval of other proposals for authorizations regarding economic commitments. Furthermore, the Riksdag approves the government's proposal that the goal for tourism policy shall cease to be valid. The Riksdag decides on the state budget in two steps. First, the framework for the 27 expenditure areas in the budget is decided. The Riksdag decided that on November 29, 2023. Thereafter, in a second step, the Riksdag determines how the money should be distributed within each expenditure area. This decision concerns step two in the decision-making process.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants parliament to reject the government's proposal to abolish the parliamentary tourism policy target. (S, V) — Reservation 1
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan establishes that the countryside must not be drained, that unemployment is an enormous waste, and that regional policy should be pursued to reduce disparities with a more active state rural policy.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that the countryside must not be drained, that unemployment is an enormous waste, and that regional policy should be pursued to reduce disparities with a more active state rural policy. Retaining a goal for tourism policy, by reference to jobs in the countryside and to the fact that the sector employs many young people and foreign-born workers, is consistent with this. The plan says nothing about the committee's reasons that the goal could be phased out.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att landsbygden inte får utarmas, att arbetslöshet är ett enormt slöseri och att regionalpolitiken ska drivas för att minska klyftorna med en mer aktiv statlig landsbygdspolitik. Att behålla ett mål för turismpolitiken, med hänvisning till arbetstillfällen på landsbygden och till att näringen sysselsätter många unga och utrikesfödda, ligger i linje med detta. Planen säger inget om utskottets skäl att målet kan avvecklas.
- the countryside must not be draineddecisive»Oavsett var i landet vi bor så har vi ett gemensamt intresse av att landsbygden inte utarmas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Regardless of where in the country we live, we have a common interest that the countryside is not drained.”
- regional equalisation»Regionalpolitiken ska därför drivas för att minska klyftorna.« (party programme ↗)“Regional policy should therefore be pursued to reduce disparities.”
- jobs across the country»Arbetslöshet är ett enormt slöseri med människors kompetens och erfarenheter.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Unemployment is an enormous waste of people's skills and experience.”
- active rural policy»mer aktiv statlig industri- och landsbygdspolitik« (party programme ↗)“more active state industry and rural policy”
The plan's overarching goal is full employment and that the whole country shall be able to live and develop with good conditions for work and business in all regions.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's overarching goal is full employment and that the whole country shall be able to live and develop with good conditions for work and business in all regions. The tourism industry creates precisely such jobs in rural areas and for young people and foreign-born, which also aligns with the plan's integration commitment that everyone who can work shall work. Maintaining a specific tourism policy goal is therefore in line with the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Planens övergripande mål är full sysselsättning och att hela landet ska kunna leva och utvecklas med goda förutsättningar för arbete och företagande i alla regioner. Besöksnäringen skapar just sådana jobb på landsbygden och för unga och utrikesfödda, vilket också ligger i planens integrationsåtagande att alla som kan jobba ska jobba. Att behålla ett särskilt turismpolitiskt mål ligger därför i linje med planen.
- the whole country shall livedecisive»Alla har ett gemensamt intresse av att hela landet kan leva och utvecklas.« (party programme ↗)“Everyone has a common interest in the whole country being able to live and develop.”
- full employment»Full sysselsättning är vårt övergripande mål.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Full employment is our overarching goal.”
- regional development»förutsättningar för arbete, företagande och studier samt erbjuda goda levnadsvillkor« (party programme ↗)“conditions for work, business and studies as well as offering good living conditions”
- work as a path to integration»Alla som kan jobba ska jobba och bidra för att bli en del av samhället.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Everyone who can work shall work and contribute to become part of society.”
The plan sees tourism and modern ecotourism as industries that create many green jobs, highlights that the tourism industry is strengthened by culture and contributes to the attractiveness of rural areas, and requires jobs and development throughout the country.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan sees tourism and modern ecotourism as industries that create many green jobs, highlights that the tourism industry is strengthened by culture and contributes to the attractiveness of rural areas, and requires jobs and development throughout the country. To abolish the specific target for tourism policy lowers the ambition for an industry that the plan explicitly wants to develop. The demand to keep the target is therefore supported, even though the plan does not comment on the target structure.
Original (Swedish)
Planen ser turism och modern ekoturism som näringar som ger många gröna jobb, framhåller att besöksnäringen stärks av kulturen och bidrar till landsbygdens attraktionskraft, och kräver jobb och utveckling i hela landet. Att avskaffa det särskilda målet för turismpolitiken sänker ambitionen för en näring som planen uttryckligen vill utveckla. Kravet att behålla målet stöds därför, även om planen inte uttalar sig om målstrukturen.
- ecotourism creates green jobsdecisive»utveckling av modern ekoturism kan ge många« (party programme ↗)“development of modern ecotourism can create many”
- tourism strengthens rural areas»Kultur bidrar till landsbygdens attraktionskraft och främjar inflyttning och besöksnäring.« (party programme ↗)“Culture contributes to the attractiveness of rural areas and promotes in-migration and tourism.”
- tourism as part of rural business»på flera ben som till exempel specialiserad livsmedelstillverkning, egen energiproduktion, gårdsbutiker, turism och naturskydd« (party programme ↗)“on several legs such as specialised food production, own energy production, farm shops, tourism and nature conservation”
- jobs throughout the country»Ett fungerande samhälle bygger på välfärd, utveckling och högkvalificerade jobb i hela landet« (party programme ↗)“A functioning society is built on welfare, development and highly qualified jobs throughout the country”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan establishes that the tourism industry is of great importance for the whole country's development and wants actively to strengthen it, among other things through on-farm sales of alcohol and better communications.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that the tourism industry is of great importance for the whole country's development and wants actively to strengthen it, among other things through on-farm sales of alcohol and better communications. Dismantling the special tourism policy goal means lower ambitions for an industry the plan points to as important for jobs in rural areas and for integration. The plan therefore supports the demand that the goal be kept.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att besöksnäringen har stor betydelse för hela landets utveckling och vill aktivt stärka den, bland annat genom gårdsförsäljning av alkohol och bättre kommunikationer. Att avveckla det särskilda turismpolitiska målet innebär lägre ambitioner för en näring planen pekar ut som viktig för jobb på landsbygden och för integrationen. Planen stöder därför kravet att målet behålls.
- importance of the tourism industrydecisive»Besöksnäringen har stor betydelse för hela landets utveckling, och för att den ska kunna fortsätta växa krävs också bättre kommunikationer och infrastruktur.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The tourism industry is of great importance for the development of the whole country, and for it to be able to continue growing also requires better communications and infrastructure.”
- actively strengthened tourism industry»Det är orimligt att lokala producenter av alkoholhaltiga drycker inte kan sälja sina produkter till besökare. Tillåt gårdsförsäljning av alkohol för att stärka besöksnäringen och utveckla landsbygden.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It is unreasonable that local producers of alcoholic beverages cannot sell their products to visitors. Permit on-farm sales of alcohol to strengthen the tourism industry and develop rural areas.”
- tourism creates jobs»Naturnära turism och upplevelser kan skapa både förståelse för miljöutmaningarna och nya jobb.« (party programme ↗)“Nature-close tourism and experiences can create both understanding of environmental challenges and new jobs.”
- entrepreneurship as integration»Småföretagen är också nyckeln till att lösa många av de problem Sverige står inför, som arbetslösheten och den bristande integrationen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Small businesses are also the key to solving many of the problems Sweden faces, such as unemployment and poor integration.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan takes no stance on a specific goal for tourism policy.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan takes no stance on a specific goal for tourism policy. The closest commitment is that conditions for business and growth shall be strengthened throughout the country and that general measures for business climate and infrastructure are most important, not sector-specific goals. On that basis, the plan gives no support for keeping a separate tourism policy goal.
Original (Swedish)
Planen tar inte ställning till ett särskilt mål för turismpolitiken. Närmast liggande åtagande är att förutsättningarna för företagande och tillväxt ska stärkas i hela landet och att generella åtgärder för företagsklimat och infrastruktur är viktigast, inte branschspecifika mål. Utifrån den principen ger planen inget stöd för att behålla ett eget turismpolitiskt mål.
- general measures rather than targeteddecisive»Viktigast är generella åtgärder för« (party programme ↗)“Most important are general measures for”
- growth throughout the country»företagande, innovationer och tillväxt ska stärkas i hela landet.« (party programme ↗)“business, innovation and growth shall be strengthened throughout the country.”
- tourism policy at national level»EU:s kultur-, turism- och mediepolitik ska till största delen återföras till nationell nivå.« (party programme ↗)“The EU's culture, tourism and media policy shall largely be returned to national level.”
The plan states that all of Sweden shall thrive and that differentiated rural entrepreneurship shall be facilitated, which supports keeping a goal for an industry that creates jobs in the countryside.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan states that all of Sweden shall thrive and that differentiated rural entrepreneurship shall be facilitated, which supports keeping a goal for an industry that creates jobs in the countryside. Jobs are also described as a key to integration, which aligns with the counter-proposal's argument. The plan's requirement for general measures in industrial policy at the same time pulls against sector-specific goals, which is why the support is weak.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att hela Sverige ska leva och att differentierat landsbygdsföretagande ska underlättas, vilket talar för att behålla ett mål för en näring som skapar arbetstillfällen på landsbygden. Jobb beskrivs dessutom som en nyckel till integration, vilket ligger nära motförslagets argument. Planens krav på generella medel i näringspolitiken drar samtidigt emot sektorsspecifika mål, varför stödet är svagt.
- all of Sweden shall thrivedecisive»Målet är att hela Sverige ska leva« (party programme ↗)“The goal is that all of Sweden shall thrive”
- rural entrepreneurship»Även differentierat landsbygdsföretagande ska underlättas.« (party programme ↗)“Differentiated rural entrepreneurship shall also be facilitated.”
- jobs as a key to integration»Jobb, kunskap i svenska språket och det civila samhället är viktiga nycklar till integration.« (party programme ↗)“Jobs, knowledge of the Swedish language and civil society are important keys to integration.”
- general industrial policy measures»Näringspolitiken ska bedrivas med generella medel,« (party programme ↗)“Industrial policy shall be conducted with general measures,”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan does not address tourism or visitor industry policy and has no goal for the area.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan does not address tourism or visitor industry policy and has no goal for the area. The nearest principle is that policy has an important task to prioritize and choose not to and that a large state creates a weaker society, which speaks against keeping a special political goal for a single industry. Based on that principle the counter-proposal's demand is rejected, but the basis is weak.
Original (Swedish)
Planen behandlar inte turism- eller besöksnäringspolitiken och har inget mål för området. Närmast liggande princip är att politiken har en viktig uppgift att prioritera och välja bort och att en stor stat ger ett svagare samhälle, vilket talar mot att behålla ett särskilt politiskt mål för en enskild näring. Utifrån den principen avvisas motförslagets krav, men underlaget är svagt.
- prioritize and choose not todecisive»Politiken har en viktig uppgift att prioritera och välja bort,« (party programme ↗)“Policy has an important task to prioritize and choose not to,”
- limited political ambitions»En stor stat leder till ett svagare samhälle.« (party programme ↗)“A large state leads to a weaker society.”
- industry before political goals»Om något kan göras lika bra eller bättre av« (party programme ↗)“If something can be done equally well or better by”
The counter-proposal wants to retain a specific goal for tourism policy, referring to tourism industry jobs in the countryside.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The counter-proposal wants to retain a specific goal for tourism policy, referring to tourism industry jobs in the countryside. The plan points out the enormous potential for recreation and tourism in the countryside and requires a policy that makes use of rural values and makes it easier to create more activities and jobs there. Derived from these commitments, the plan speaks for continued ambition for tourism industry, while the plan does not take a position on the goal structure as such.
Original (Swedish)
Motförslaget vill behålla ett särskilt mål för turismpolitiken med hänvisning till besöksnäringens jobb på landsbygden. Planen pekar ut potentialen för rekreation och turism på landsbygden som enorm och kräver en politik som tar till vara landsbygdens värden och gör det enklare att skapa fler verksamheter och jobb där. Härlett ur dessa åtaganden talar planen för fortsatt ambition för besöksnäringen, medan planen inte uttalar sig om målstrukturen som sådan.
- tourism's value in the countrysidedecisive»Värdet på mineraler i marken, på skogar och potentialen för rekreation och turism är enorm på landsbygden.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The value of minerals in the ground, forests and the potential for recreation and tourism is enormous in the countryside.”
- more activities and jobs in the countryside»Sverige behöver en politik som tar till vara värdet ute i landsbygden och som gör det enklare att i kombination med en väl avvägd miljöhänsyn att skapa fler verksamheter, jobb och ökad tillväxt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden needs policy that makes use of the value of the countryside and that makes it easier, in combination with a well-balanced environmental consideration, to create more activities, jobs and increased growth.”
- business throughout the country»Underlätta för industri och näringsliv i hela landet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Facilitate industry and business throughout the country”
- policy for the whole of Sweden»Bedriva en politik för hela Sverige« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Conduct policy for the whole of Sweden”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2023/24:NU1)
- Committee report full text (HB01NU1)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2023/24:2325 — Utgiftsområde 24 Näringsliv av Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2023/24:2632 — Handel och exportfrämjande av Fredrik Olovsson m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2023/24:2634 — Utgiftsområde 24 Näringsliv av Fredrik Olovsson m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2023/24:2703 — Utgiftsområde 24 Näringsliv av Elin Söderberg m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2023/24:2728 — Utgiftsområde 24 Näringsliv av Elisabeth Thand Ringqvist m.fl. (C)
- Proposition 2023/24:1 — Budgetpropositionen för 2024
Source: The Swedish Parliament