2025-03-262024/25:UU15 · p.1UUForeign affairs
The Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Sweden's stance on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict
What's at stake: The position affects how actively Sweden pursues ceasefire, humanitarian access and accountability in the conflict, with major significance for the civilian population in Gaza and for Sweden's role in EU and international action.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is the government's and the Riksdag's stance on the war in Gaza and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and whether Sweden should instead take a more assertive line – including working for the EU to freeze its association agreement with Israel and to support ICC investigations of war crimes.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee welcomes the ceasefire that has begun in Gaza and states that it is crucial that the agreement is implemented, that the hostages are released, and that humanitarian access for the civilian population in Gaza improves. The committee holds that a sustainable peace must rest on a negotiated two-state solution and that the government, together with other EU and Nordic countries, should actively pursue the access issue, while Israel has obligations under international law to ensure humanitarian aid reaches civilians.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 1 (S)
The dissenters (S) demand that Sweden more actively push for an immediate ceasefire and the release of hostages, that Sweden support the ICC's work investigating war crimes by both Israel and Hamas, and that the government work for the EU to freeze its association agreement with Israel until it complies with the International Court of Justice's ruling.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 1 by S.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
What each plan points to — and how the party voted
For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| Plan | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Abstain 0/0/20/4 | departs from the plan | confidence: high | derived |
| S | No | No 0/93/0/13 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| MP | No | Abstain 0/0/16/2 | departs from the plan | confidence: high | derived |
| C | No | Abstain 0/0/20/4 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| L | No | Yes 14/0/0/2 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | derived |
| KD | No | Yes 17/0/0/2 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| M | Yes | Yes 60/0/0/8 | follows the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| SD | Yes | Yes 62/0/0/10 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2024/25:3020 by Nooshi Dadgostar et al. (V) motions 1-6, 8, 10-12, 14, 18 and 19, 2024/25:3043 by Jacob Risberg et al. (MP) motions 1-6, 11, 12 and 15-18, 2024/25:3107 by Morgan Johansson et al. (S) motions 7, 8 and 10 and 2024/25:3162 by Kerstin Lundgren et al. (C) motion 47.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2024/25:3020 av Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V) yrkandena 1-6, 8, 10-12, 14, 18 och 19, 2024/25:3043 av Jacob Risberg m.fl. (MP) yrkandena 1-6, 11, 12 och 15-18, 2024/25:3107 av Morgan Johansson m.fl. (S) yrkandena 7, 8 och 10 samt 2024/25:3162 av Kerstin Lundgren m.fl. (C) yrkande 47.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag rejected approximately 150 proposals on the situation in Israel and Palestine, among other things. These concern the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, aid to Palestine and UNRWA, and measures against settlers in the West Bank. The proposals were submitted during the general motion period in 2024.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants Sweden to push for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza, for hostages to be released, and for the EU to freeze its association agreement with Israel. (S) — Reservation 1
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan requires that Sweden consistently defends international law and human rights and that violations of international law are monitored and countered, and that Sweden is a voice for peace rather than militarization.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that Sweden consistently defends international law and human rights and that violations of international law are monitored and countered, and that Sweden is a voice for peace rather than militarization. Demands for a ceasefire, support for the ICC's investigations of war crimes on both sides and that the association agreement is frozen until the court's ruling are applications of this. The measures are not explicitly mentioned in the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att Sverige konsekvent försvarar folkrätten och de mänskliga rättigheterna och att brott mot internationell lag uppmärksammas och motverkas, samt att Sverige är en röst för fred snarare än militarisering. Krav på vapenvila, stöd till ICC:s utredningar av krigsbrott på båda sidor och att associeringsavtalet fryses till dess domstolens utslag följs är tillämpningar av det. Åtgärderna nämns inte uttryckligen i planen.
- international law uphelddecisive»Genom FN får även små länder en röst och starka militärmakters brott mot internationell lag kan uppmärksammas och motverkas.« (party programme ↗)“Through the UN, even small countries get a voice and powerful military powers' violations of international law can be monitored and countered.”
- voice for peace»Vänsterpartiet anser att Sverige ska vara en röst för fred och rättvisa, inte för ökad militarisering.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Left Party believes that Sweden should be a voice for peace and justice, not for increased militarization.”
- voice for human rights»en stadig röst i världen som talar för mänskliga rättigheter« (party programme ↗)“a steady voice in the world speaking for human rights”
- pressure on human rights violations»förbjuda vapenexport till diktaturer, stater som för angreppskrig och« (party programme ↗)“ban arms exports to dictatorships, states that wage aggressive wars and”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan binds the party to upholding international law and that the UN Charter shall guide the use of military force, while organized violence against the civilian population shall always be rejected.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan binds the party to upholding international law and that the UN Charter shall guide the use of military force, while organized violence against the civilian population shall always be rejected. More active work for ceasefire and hostage release, support for ICC's investigations of war crimes and demand that agreements be conditioned on international law rulings following is in line with this - the plan wants EU agreements to be guided by human rights. However, the association agreement is not specifically mentioned.
Original (Swedish)
Planen förbinder partiet att stå upp för folkrätten och att FN-stadgan ska vara styrande för användandet av militärt våld, samtidigt som organiserat våld mot civilbefolkningen alltid ska avvisas. Ett mer aktivt arbete för vapenvila och gisslanfrigivning, stöd till ICC:s utredningar av krigsbrott och krav på att avtal villkoras av att folkrättsliga utslag följs ligger i linje med detta - planen vill ju att EU:s avtal ska vägledas av mänskliga rättigheter. Just associeringsavtalet nämns dock inte.
- uphold international lawdecisive»Vi har en lång historia av att stå upp för folkrätten, solidaritet, nedrustning, demokrati och jämställdhet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We have a long history of upholding international law, solidarity, disarmament, democracy and equality.”
- international law guiding»Vetorätten i säkerhetsrådet måste inskränkas och FN och FN-stadgan bli styrande för allt« (party programme ↗)“Veto power in the Security Council must be restricted and the UN and UN Charter become guiding for all”
- human rights in agreements»EU behöver sluta fler handelsavtal där också våra värderingar om social dialog, mänskliga rättigheter och miljö är vägledande.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“EU needs to conclude more trade agreements where also our values about social dialogue, human rights and environment are guiding.”
- violence against civilians rejected»mot civilbefolkningen, måste därför alltid avvisas.« (party programme ↗)“against the civilian population, must therefore always be rejected.”
The party programme places international law and human rights at the centre, wants to put human security before territorial and requires strict demands on human rights in trade policy as well as developed EU tools against rights violations.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme places international law and human rights at the centre, wants to put human security before territorial and requires strict demands on human rights in trade policy as well as developed EU tools against rights violations. To actively pursue ceasefires and hostage releases, support investigation of war crimes and freeze the association agreement until the court's decision is consistent with this.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet sätter folkrätten och de mänskliga rättigheterna i centrum, vill sätta mänsklig säkerhet före territoriell och kräver hårda krav på mänskliga rättigheter i handelspolitiken samt utvecklade EU-verktyg mot rättighetsbrott. Att driva vapenvila och gisslanfrigivning aktivt, stödja utredning av krigsbrott och frysa associeringsavtalet till dess domstolens utslag följs ligger i linje med detta.
- international law at the centredecisive»Miljöpartiet de gröna sätter folkrätten och de mänskliga rättigheterna i centrum.« (party programme ↗)“The Green Party places international law and human rights at the centre.”
- rights demands in trade policy»Vi vill införa hårda miljökrav och sociala krav i handelspolitiken som kan bidra till förbättringar långt utanför EU:s gränser.« (party programme ↗)“We want to introduce strict environmental and social demands in trade policy that can contribute to improvements far outside the EU's borders.”
- human security first»Vi vill se en politik som sätter mänsklig säkerhet före territoriell.« (party programme ↗)“We want to see a policy that puts human security before territorial.”
- sharper EU tools»EU måste få bättre verktyg att ta itu med brott mot de mänskliga rättigheterna inom unionen, och sanktionssystemet behöver utvecklas.« (party programme ↗)“The EU must get better tools to address violations of human rights within the union, and the sanctions system needs to be developed.”
Worldstate weighed in: Parliamentary questions about Israel's actions in Gaza and Sweden's commitments to the International Court of Justice — activates the plan's international law principle in a situation the documents did not anticipate
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The party programme states that foreign and security policy ultimately aims to protect universal human freedoms and rights and that peace and protection of human rights are the whole world's responsibility.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme states that foreign and security policy ultimately aims to protect universal human freedoms and rights and that peace and protection of human rights are the whole world's responsibility. The election manifesto is prepared to impose tougher requirements in trade agreements. Driving for ceasefire and hostage release more actively, supporting legal proceedings for war crimes and conditioning the association agreement on compliance with international law follow from these principles, but the conflict is not addressed in the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet slår fast att utrikes- och säkerhetspolitiken ytterst syftar till att värna universella mänskliga fri- och rättigheter och att fred och skyddet av mänskliga rättigheter är hela världens ansvar. Valmanifestet är berett att ställa hårdare krav i handelsavtal. Att driva vapenvila och gisslanfrigivning aktivare, stödja rättslig prövning av krigsbrott och villkora associeringsavtalet mot folkrättslig efterlevnad följer av dessa principer, men konflikten behandlas inte i planen.
- foreign policy protects rightsdecisive»Utrikes- och säkerhetspolitiken syftar ytterst till att värna universella mänskliga fri- och rättigheter.« (party programme ↗)“Foreign and security policy ultimately aims to protect universal human freedoms and rights.”
- conditional trade agreements»Ställ hårdare krav på arbetsvillkor, miljö och klimat i handelsavtal.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Set tougher requirements on working conditions, environment and climate in trade agreements.”
- global responsibility for peace»Fred, skyddet av mänskliga rättigheter och hållbar utveckling är hela världens ansvar.« (party programme ↗)“Peace, protection of human rights and sustainable development are the whole world's responsibility.”
- international peace operations»Centerpartiet vill att Sverige ska bistå i internationella fredsinsatser, gärna i ökad utsträckning under direkt FN-ledning.« (party programme ↗)“The Centre Party wants Sweden to assist in international peace operations, preferably in increasing scope under direct UN leadership.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan takes no stance in the conflict, but requires that the International Criminal Court's role in prosecuting crimes against humanity is strengthened and that the EU's agreements with its neighbours to the south contain the same requirements for democracy and human rights as the agreements to the east.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan takes no stance in the conflict, but requires that the International Criminal Court's role in prosecuting crimes against humanity is strengthened and that the EU's agreements with its neighbours to the south contain the same requirements for democracy and human rights as the agreements to the east. On that basis, the requirement for ICC support, active work for ceasefire and conditioning of the association agreement is supported. The plan's strong free trade line however constitutes a reservation against agreement freezing as an instrument.
Original (Swedish)
Planen tar inte ställning i konflikten, men kräver att Internationella brottmålsdomstolens roll för att lagföra brott mot mänskliga rättigheter stärks och att EU:s avtal med grannländerna söderut innehåller samma krav på demokrati och mänskliga rättigheter som avtalen österut. Utifrån det stöds kravet på ICC-stöd, aktivt arbete för vapenvila och villkorande av associeringsavtalet. Planens starka frihandelslinje utgör dock ett förbehåll mot avtalsfrysning som instrument.
- accountability for crimes against humanitydecisive»Internationella brottmålsdomstolens roll för att lagföra brott mot mänskliga rättigheter ska stärkas.« (party programme ↗)“The International Criminal Court's role in prosecuting crimes against humanity shall be strengthened.”
- human rights conditions in EU agreements»EU:s grannskapsavtal med unionens grannar söderut måste innehålla samma krav på demokrati« (party programme ↗)“The EU's association agreements with its southern neighbours must contain the same requirements for democracy”
- values-driven foreign policy»Vi kallar det för vad det är: en ny värderingsstyrd utrikespolitik.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We call it what it is: a new values-driven foreign policy.”
- the EU as foreign policy forum»Europeiska unionen är det främsta forumet för svensk utrikes- och säkerhetspolitik.« (party programme ↗)“The European Union is the foremost forum for Swedish foreign and security policy.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan makes peace, human rights and reconciliation aims for foreign policy, requires that compliance with international obligations is guaranteed and that international courts and legal systems are protected and strengthened.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan makes peace, human rights and reconciliation aims for foreign policy, requires that compliance with international obligations is guaranteed and that international courts and legal systems are protected and strengthened. Boycott and sanctions are permitted as a last resort. Actively driving ceasefire and hostage release, supporting criminal investigations on both sides and freezing the association agreement until court ruling lies in accordance with this.
Original (Swedish)
Planen gör fred, mänskliga rättigheter och försoning till mål för utrikespolitiken, kräver att efterlevnaden av internationella förpliktelser garanteras och att internationella domstolar och rättssystem skyddas och stärks. Bojkott och sanktioner tillåts som en sista utväg. Att driva vapenvila och gisslanfrigivning aktivt, stödja brottsutredningar mot båda sidor och frysa associeringsavtalet till dess domstolsutslag följs ligger i linje med detta.
- international obligations shall be complied withdecisive»efterlevandet av internationella förpliktelser garanteras« (party programme ↗)“compliance with international obligations is guaranteed”
- strengthened international courts»liksom olika internationella domstolar och rättssystem« (party programme ↗)“as well as various international courts and legal systems”
- peace and HR as aim»Svensk utrikespolitik ska främja fred, frihet, demokrati och utveckling« (party programme ↗)“Swedish foreign policy shall promote peace, freedom, democracy and development”
- sanctions as last resort»utväg kan bojkott och sanktioner bli aktuella.« (party programme ↗)“last resort boycott and sanctions can become relevant.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan does not take a position in the conflict.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan does not take a position in the conflict. Its decisive requirement on this area is that Swedish foreign policy shall value Swedish interests and that the state shall facilitate trade and internationalization. Freezing the association agreement with Israel is a trade restriction that lacks support in the plan, even though the plan's line to be a strong voice for human rights speaks for the other parts of the counter-proposal.
Original (Swedish)
Planen tar inte ställning i konflikten. Dess avgörande krav på detta område är att svensk utrikespolitik ska värna svenska intressen och att staten ska underlätta handel och internationalisering. Att frysa associeringsavtalet med Israel är en handelsrestriktion som saknar stöd i planen, även om planens linje om att vara en stark röst för mänskliga rättigheter talar för de övriga delarna av motförslaget.
- Swedish interests guideweak support»Svensk utrikespolitik ska värna svenska intressen.« (party programme ↗)“Swedish foreign policy shall value Swedish interests.”
- trade shall be facilitateddecisive»och underlätta för handel och internationalisering.« (party programme ↗)“and facilitate trade and internationalization.”
- strong voice for human rights»Sverige ska vara en stark röst för frihet, demokrati och« (party programme ↗)“Sweden shall be a strong voice for freedom, democracy and”
flags: citat_svagt
The plan's foreign policy commitment is that the relationship with Israel, as the only democracy in its region, shall be restored and maintained and that foreign policy shall primarily protect Swedish interests.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's foreign policy commitment is that the relationship with Israel, as the only democracy in its region, shall be restored and maintained and that foreign policy shall primarily protect Swedish interests. Freezing the EU's association agreement with Israel and driving legal proceedings against the country goes against that commitment. The requirement for release of hostages, on the other hand, aligns with the plan's fight against international terrorism, but the plan's main line speaks against the counter-proposal as a whole.
Original (Swedish)
Planens utrikespolitiska åtagande är att relationen till Israel, som den enda demokratin i sin region, ska återupprättas och vårdas och att utrikespolitiken främst ska värna svenska intressen. Att frysa EU:s associeringsavtal med Israel och driva rättsprocesser mot landet går emot det åtagandet. Kravet på frigivning av gisslan ligger däremot i linje med planens kamp mot internationell terrorism, men planens huvudlinje talar mot motförslaget som helhet.
- maintained Israel relationshipdecisive»Relationen till Israel, som den enda demokratin i sin region, bör återupprättas och vårdas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The relationship with Israel, as the only democracy in its region, should be restored and maintained.”
- Swedish interests first»Sverigedemokraterna vill att inriktningen av utrikespolitiken i högre utsträckning än idag ska värna svenskarnas intressen på det globala planet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden Democrats want the direction of foreign policy to a greater extent than today protect Swedes' interests on the global stage.”
- against terrorism»Bekämpa internationell terrorism och islamism« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Combat international terrorism and Islamism”
- independent foreign policy»värna svenska intressen samt demokratiska fri- och rättigheter i världen« (party programme ↗)“protect Swedish interests and democratic freedoms and rights in the world”
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2024/25:UU15)
- Committee report full text (HC01UU15)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2024/25:1041 — Erkännande av Jerusalem som Israels huvudstad av Magnus Oscarsson och Dan Hovskär (båda KD)
- Motion 2024/25:1159 — Marshallplan för fred och utveckling i Gaza av Magnus Jacobsson och Magnus Berntsson (båda KD)
- Motion 2024/25:1211 — Inrättande av en internationell tribunal för att ställa IS till svars av Yusuf Aydin och Magnus Berntsson (båda KD)
- Motion 2024/25:1214 — Självstyre för kristna minoriteter på Nineveslätten i Irak av Yusuf Aydin (KD)
- Motion 2024/25:1215 — Omprövning av sanktioner mot Syrien i humanitärt syfte av Yusuf Aydin (KD)
- Motion 2024/25:1247 — Sverige måste anta en ny Iranpolitik av Azadeh Rojhan och Louise Thunström (båda S)
- Motion 2024/25:134 — Avveckling av Sveriges generalkonsulat i Jerusalem av Magnus Jacobsson (KD)
- Motion 2024/25:135 — Avveckling av UNRWA av Magnus Jacobsson (KD)
- Motion 2024/25:137 — Flytt av Sveriges ambassad till Jerusalem av Magnus Jacobsson (KD)
- Motion 2024/25:1430 — Vissa frågor i Mellanöstern och Afrika av Markus Wiechel m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1435 — Stöd till utsatta grupper av Rasmus Giertz m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1437 — Israel och Palestina av Rasmus Giertz m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1438 — Internationella relationer och mänskliga rättigheter av Markus Wiechel m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1716 — Israel och Palestina av Jamal El-Haj (-)
- Motion 2024/25:1721 — Hävande av ockupationen av Palestina av Jamal El-Haj (-)
- Motion 2024/25:1735 — Fryst UNRWA-stöd till förmån för UNHCR av Hans Eklind (KD)
- Motion 2024/25:1736 — Erkännande av Jerusalem som Israels huvudstad av Hans Eklind (KD)
- Motion 2024/25:1737 — Flytt av Sveriges ambassad i Israel av Mikael Oscarsson och Magnus Oscarsson (båda KD)
- Motion 2024/25:2009 — Vapenvila i Gaza, sanktioner mot bosättarrörelsen och frysning av handelsavtalet mellan Israel och EU av Joakim Sandell m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2024/25:225 — Indraget bistånd till UNRWA av Josef Fransson (SD)
Source: The Swedish Parliament