Future direction

The plan requires that all political decisions take the climate crisis into account, which speaks for the rules on fossil energy in the ethical review to be clearly reported. It is also built on the notion that class, gender and racism are separate but interacting systems of power, which is exactly the intersectional perspective the counter-proposal is asking for.

• all decisions should be climate-testeddecisive»Omställningen behöver ske omgående och alla politiska beslut behöver ta hänsyn till den akuta kris som vi befinner oss i.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The transition needs to happen immediately and all political decisions need to take into account the acute crisis we find ourselves in.”
• state of climate emergency»Vi befinner oss i ett klimatnödläge.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We find ourselves in a state of climate emergency.”
• systems of power interact»Även patriarkatet och rasismen samverkar.« (party programme ↗)“Patriarchy and racism also interact.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

The plan requires that equality policy is directed against all forms of domination and subordination in a holistic perspective, which is precisely an intersectional approach. The commitment to a fossil-free welfare nation and to environmental considerations as an overriding requirement supports that rules about fossil energy in ethical review are clarified. The counter-proposal's demand for broader sustainability linkage is thereby in line with the plan.

• intersectional equality workdecisive»Jämlikhetspolitik måste riktas mot alla former av över- och underordning, och dessa måste ses i ett helhetsperspektiv där olika förtryckande strukturer samverkar och förstärker varandra.« (party programme ↗)“Equality policy must be directed against all forms of domination and subordination, and these must be seen in a holistic perspective where different oppressive structures interact and reinforce each other.”
• multiple subordination»Många människor möter en dubbel eller flerdubbel underordning, där olika maktstrukturer förstärker varandra.« (party programme ↗)“Many people encounter a double or multiple subordination, where different power structures reinforce each other.”
• fossil-free welfare nation»Sverige ska bli världens första fossilfria välfärdsnation.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden shall become the world's first fossil-free welfare nation.”
• environmental consideration overriding»Den ser miljöhänsyn som ett överordnat krav i all produktion.« (party programme ↗)“It sees environmental consideration as an overriding requirement in all production.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

The plan requires that coal, oil and fossil gas are phased out and that fossil subsidies cease, which argues for clarifying rules on fossil energy in the ethical scrutiny of investments. The party programme's intersectional power analysis and the requirement for ethical, social and ecological considerations also support a broader sustainability and intersectional perspective in the direction. The plan therefore supports the counter-proposal.

• phasing out of fossil energydecisive»införa en omställningslag så att all industri fasar ut kol, olja och fossilgas till senast 2030.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“introduce a transition law so that all industry phases out coal, oil and fossil gas by no later than 2030.”
• no fossil subsidies»fasa ut fossila subventioner.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“phase out fossil subsidies.”
• intersectional power analysis»Vi ser att maktordningar som etnicitet, sexuell« (party programme ↗)“We see that power structures such as ethnicity, sexual”
• ethical investment requirements»Alla aktörer i ekonomin har ett ansvar att ta etiska,« (party programme ↗)“All actors in the economy have a responsibility to take ethical,”

The plan does not address the fund's reporting, but its commitments point in the same direction as the counter-proposal's three requirements: fossil fuels should be phased out, policy should be long-term sustainable, and all structures that discriminate against people should be fought regardless of grounds. The requirement for dispersal throughout the country corresponds to the plan's line that activities should reach the whole country.

• counter discriminatory structuresdecisive»Vi bekämpar alla strukturer, formella och informella, som förtrycker eller diskriminerar människor.« (party programme ↗)“We fight all structures, formal and informal, that oppress or discriminate against people.”
• phase out fossil fuels»Vi vill stoppa all energihandel med Ryssland och fasa ut fossila bränslen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to stop all energy trade with Russia and phase out fossil fuels.”
• long-term sustainability»Vår politik bygger på reformer som är långsiktigt hållbara« (party programme ↗)“Our politics is based on reforms that are long-term sustainable”
• activities throughout the country»Statliga kulturinstitutioner ska sprida sin verksamhet i hela landet.« (party programme ↗)“State cultural institutions shall spread their activities throughout the country.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

The documents say nothing about this fund's direction or reporting. Nearest lying principles are that liberal justice is about equal opportunities and not equal results and that the individual, not group identity, is the starting point, which argues against steering distribution with an intersectional perspective. The plan's environmental line is also built on general steering instruments and takes distance from symbolic politics rather than on detailed placement conditions.

• equal opportunities not resultsdecisive»Liberal rättvisa handlar om lika förutsättningar, inte om lika resultat.« (party programme ↗)“Liberal justice is about equal opportunities, not equal results.”
• the individual as starting point»Det liberala samhället bärs upp av individer i gemenskap.« (party programme ↗)“The liberal society is supported by individuals in community.”
• no to symbolic politics»tar avstånd från symbolpolitik och åtgärder som dövar samveten i stället för att rädda miljön« (party programme ↗)“takes distance from symbolic politics and measures that numb the conscience instead of saving the environment”

The counter-proposal wants to steer the foundation's future direction toward broader sustainability linkage and a clearer intersectional perspective. The plan's view of humanity starts from the fact that every person has the same absolute value regardless of group affiliation and explicitly rejects collectivist starting points, and support should primarily be directed to children's and youth activities based on need. A group-dividing perspective as a guiding direction therefore receives no support, while the stewardship requirement for ethical review supports it.

• equal value regardless of groupdecisive»att varje enskild människa har samma absoluta värde oavsett ålder, etniskt eller socialt ursprung« (party programme ↗)“that each individual person has the same absolute value regardless of age, ethnic or social origin”
• rejects collectivism»Kristdemokratin vänder sig mot såväl individualismen som kollektivismen.« (party programme ↗)“Christian democracy opposes both individualism and collectivism.”
• support to children and youth»första hand inriktas mot barn- och ungdomsverksamhet.« (party programme ↗)“first hand directed toward children's and youth activities.”
• stewardship in all decisions»Alla politiska beslut bör fattas i enlighet med förvaltarskapsprincipen« (party programme ↗)“All political decisions should be made in accordance with the stewardship principle”

The counter-proposal wants to steer the fund's reporting with fossil rules in ethical review, broader sustainability linkage and an intersectional perspective. The party programme rejects identity politics' collectivization of humankind and warns against environmental policy becoming expensive symbolic politics, and the election manifesto changes goal from renewable to fossil-free. The requirements thus lie wrong in relation to the plan's principles and are rejected.

• no to symbolic politicsdecisive»Klimatpolitiken får aldrig reduceras till dyrbar symbolpolitik eller snäv klimatnationalism.« (party programme ↗)“Environmental policy must never be reduced to expensive symbolic politics or narrow climate nationalism.”
• rejects identity politics»identitetspolitikens kollektivisering av människan« (party programme ↗)“identity politics' collectivization of humankind”
• fossil-free before renewable»Ändra det energipolitiska målet från 100 procent förnybart till 100 procent fossilfritt« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Change the energy policy goal from 100 per cent renewable to 100 per cent fossil-free”

The counter-proposal wishes to direct the fund's future orientation with rules on fossil energy, broader sustainability goals and a clearer intersectional perspective. The plan rejects political experiments and gender-theoretical premises and requires that climate measures be guided by evidence and global effect rather than political will to go furthest. An intersectional framework for resource allocation has no support in the plan.

• reject gender theorydecisive»Vi tror på vetenskap och inser att förvirrande genusteorier får förödande konsekvenser när de omsätts i praktiken.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We believe in science and realize that confusing gender theories have devastating consequences when put into practice.”
• formal equality»Riktig jämställdhet nås inte genom att vidta politiska åtgärder för att på gruppnivå skapa samma utfall mellan män och kvinnor, utan genom att ta krafttag mot samhällsfenomen som begränsar den enskilde.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“True equality is not achieved by taking political action to create the same outcomes between men and women at the group level, but by taking action against social phenomena that limit the individual.”
• evidence-guided climate goals»Evidens, resultat och svensk konkurrenskraft ska styra genomförandet av klimatmål i högre utsträckning än politikers vilja att gå först och längst.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Evidence, results and Swedish competitiveness shall guide the implementation of climate goals to a greater extent than politicians' will to go first and furthest.”
• stop political experiments»Avsluta de politiska experimenten på Sveriges barn och unga« (2022 manifesto ↗)“End the political experiments on Sweden's children and young people”