2025-04-022024/25:CU14 · p.7CUCivil law & housing
Climate Issues in Planning and Green Area Planning
Climate adaptation, stormwater management and green space in physical planning
What's at stake: The decision affects how well built-up areas cope with heavy rainfall, heatwaves and other climate effects, and who bears responsibility and cost for managing stormwater and creating more green space. It concerns property owners, municipalities' planning work, and residents of densely built areas who are most exposed to flooding and heat.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether new legislation is needed to require property owners to manage stormwater, introduce a mandatory green-space factor for new construction and regulate the share of permeable ground, or whether the existing Planning and Building Act already provides sufficient tools for climate adaptation in planning.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee rejects the motions calling for stricter requirements on stormwater management, a green-space factor and nature compensation. It assesses that the existing Planning and Building Act already provides the means to accommodate proposals on climate adaptation and stormwater management at various stages of the planning process, including through the county administrative board's power to overturn unsuitable local plans.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 12 (MP)
The reservation (MP) calls for legislation requiring property owners to manage part of the stormwater on their own land, making a green-space factor mandatory for all new construction, and examining regulation of how much plot, block and public land must remain permeable. The reasoning is that older local plans are rarely reassessed, that water and sewage network maintenance is lagging, and that more urban greenery is needed to withstand both heavy rainfall and heatwaves.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 12 by MP.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
What each plan points to — and how the party voted
For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| Plan | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Yes 20/0/0/4 | departs from the plan | confidence: high | derived |
| S | No | Yes 93/0/0/13 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| MP | No | No 0/16/0/2 | follows the plan | confidence: high | explicit |
| C | No | Abstain 0/0/20/4 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| L | No | Yes 13/0/0/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| KD | Yes | Yes 17/0/0/2 | follows the plan | confidence: low | derived |
| M | Yes | Yes 60/0/0/8 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| SD | Yes | Yes 62/0/0/10 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2024/25:161 by Ingemar Kihlström (KD), 2024/25:203 by Mathias Bengtsson (KD), 2024/25:1315 by Katarina Luhr et al. (MP) items 1, 3 and 5-7, 2024/25:1318 by Katarina Luhr et al. (MP) items 11-13, 2024/25:2485 by Stina Larsson et al. (C) items 9 and 13, 2024/25:2613 by Elin Söderberg et al. (MP) items 96 and 159, 2024/25:2627 by Elin Söderberg et al. (MP) items 6, 8, 9, 11 and 12, and 2024/25:3037 by Daniel Helldén et al. (MP) items 151-153.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2024/25:161 av Ingemar Kihlström (KD), 2024/25:203 av Mathias Bengtsson (KD), 2024/25:1315 av Katarina Luhr m.fl. (MP) yrkandena 1, 3 och 5-7, 2024/25:1318 av Katarina Luhr m.fl. (MP) yrkandena 11-13, 2024/25:2485 av Stina Larsson m.fl. (C) yrkandena 9 och 13, 2024/25:2613 av Elin Söderberg m.fl. (MP) yrkandena 96 och 159, 2024/25:2627 av Elin Söderberg m.fl. (MP) yrkandena 6, 8, 9, 11 och 12 samt 2024/25:3037 av Daniel Helldén m.fl. (MP) yrkandena 151-153.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag rejected approximately 170 proposals on planning and construction in motions from the 2024 general motion period. The Riksdag refers, among other things, to ongoing work and applicable regulations within the areas covered by the proposals. The proposals concern, among other things, the planning system, sustainability and climate adaptation measures, as well as questions about building and demolition permits.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants the Board of Housing, Building and Planning to include sports facility and sports environment planning in its guidance to municipalities. (MP) — Reservation 12
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan wants housing to be built as part of a larger urban planning with protective greenery, and requires that all political decisions take into account the acute climate situation.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants housing to be built as part of a larger urban planning with protective greenery, and requires that all political decisions take into account the acute climate situation. Requirements for stormwater management, green factor and permeable ground are precisely such measures against cloudbursts and heat waves. The plan calls for ambitious goals monitored by sharp legislation, not merely guidance.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill att bostäder byggs som del av ett större samhällsbygge med skyddande grönska, och kräver att alla politiska beslut tar hänsyn till det akuta klimatläget. Krav på dagvattenhantering, grönytefaktor och genomsläpplig mark är just sådana åtgärder mot skyfall och värmeböljor. Planen efterfrågar ambitiösa mål som följs upp med skarp lagstiftning, inte enbart vägledning.
- greenery in residential environmentsdecisive»Bostäderna behöver vara en del av ett större samhällsbygge, där vi skapar goda boendemiljöer med skyddande grönska, mötesplatser,« (party programme ↗)“Housing needs to be part of larger urban planning, where we create good living environments with protective greenery, meeting places,”
- climate consideration in all decisions»Omställningen behöver ske omgående och alla politiska beslut behöver ta hänsyn till den akuta kris som vi befinner oss i.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The transition needs to happen immediately and all political decisions need to take account of the acute crisis we are in.”
- sharp environmental legislation»Vi vill se ambitiösa miljömål som följs upp med skarp lagstiftning och praktiskt arbete.« (party programme ↗)“We want to see ambitious environmental goals monitored by sharp legislation and practical work.”
- comprehensive ecosystem work»Sverige behöver också ett medvetet och heltäckande arbete med att skapa goda villkor för rika ekosystem, bland annat genom att återställa natur och kompensera för förlorade naturvärden.« (party programme ↗)“Sweden also needs a conscious and comprehensive effort to create good conditions for rich ecosystems, including by restoring nature and compensating for lost natural values.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto commits to strengthening preparedness against extreme weather and continuing major investments so municipalities can adapt locally to climate change, and the party programme requires that environmental considerations be built in from the start and forward-looking urban development.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto commits to strengthening preparedness against extreme weather and continuing major investments so municipalities can adapt locally to climate change, and the party programme requires that environmental considerations be built in from the start and forward-looking urban development. Requirements for stormwater management on the owner's property, green space factor and permeable ground are concrete expressions for the same line against cloudbursts and heat waves. The individual instruments are not mentioned in the documents.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet åtar sig att stärka beredskapen mot extremväder och fortsätta de stora investeringarna så att kommunerna kan klimatanpassa lokalt, och partiprogrammet kräver att miljöhänsyn byggs in redan från början och ett framtidsinriktat stadsbyggande. Krav på dagvattenhantering på egen fastighet, grönytefaktor och genomsläpplig mark är konkreta uttryck för samma linje mot skyfall och värmeböljor. De enskilda instrumenten nämns inte i dokumenten.
- municipal climate adaptationdecisive»Vi vill fortsätta de stora investeringarna så att kommunerna kan klimatanpassa lokalt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to continue major investments so municipalities can adapt locally to climate change.”
- preparedness for extreme weather»Stärk beredskapen mot extremväder.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strengthen preparedness against extreme weather.”
- environmental requirements from the start»Hänsynen till miljöns krav ska byggas in i produktionsprocesserna redan från början.« (party programme ↗)“Environmental considerations shall be built into production processes from the start.”
- forward-looking urban development»framtidsinriktat stadsbyggande som skapar integrerade, variationsrika och transportsnåla« (party programme ↗)“forward-looking urban development that creates integrated, varied and transport-efficient”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan wants to invest in more nature and greenery in cities and towns and requires more greenery and open water in built-up areas precisely to cope with cloudburst flooding, and climate adaptation of buildings for cloudburst and heat.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to invest in more nature and greenery in cities and towns and requires more greenery and open water in built-up areas precisely to cope with cloudburst flooding, and climate adaptation of buildings for cloudburst and heat. The counter-proposal's requirements for local stormwater management, green space factor at new production and regulated permeable ground are the same thing in substance. Therefore, the plan supports the requirement.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill investera i mer natur och grönska i städer och tätorter och kräver mer grönska och öppet vatten i tätorterna just för att klara skyfall, samt klimatanpassning av bebyggelse för skyfall och hetta. Motförslagets krav på lokal dagvattenhantering, grönytefaktor vid nyproduktion och reglerad genomsläpplig mark är samma sak i sak. Därför stöder planen kravet.
- greenery against cloudburstdecisive»tätorterna mer grönska och öppet vatten.« (party programme ↗)“built-up areas more greenery and open water.”
- more urban greenery»investera i mer natur och grönska i städer och tätorter.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“invest in more nature and greenery in cities and towns.”
- climate-adapted buildings»anpassa äldreboenden, skolor och förskolor för att klara skyfall och hetta.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“adapt elderly homes, schools and preschools to cope with cloudbursts and heat.”
- invest in climate adaptation»investera i klimatanpassning för att möta effekterna av klimatförändringarna.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“invest in climate adaptation to meet the effects of climate change.”
The plan wants greener cities with more green areas close to people and cleaner water, and is based on the principle that those who pollute the environment should bear the cost — which the counter-proposal's requirement that property owners manage their own stormwater is an expression of.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants greener cities with more green areas close to people and cleaner water, and is based on the principle that those who pollute the environment should bear the cost — which the counter-proposal's requirement that property owners manage their own stormwater is an expression of. Green space factor and permeable ground are measures in the same direction ahead of heavy rainfall and heat waves. The plan's warning against costly and complicated regulations points in the opposite direction, but the substance direction weighs more heavily. The plan therefore supports the requirement.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill grönare städer med fler grönområden nära människor och renare vatten, och bygger på principen att den som belastar miljön ska bära kostnaden — vilket motförslagets krav på att fastighetsägaren hanterar sitt eget dagvatten är ett uttryck för. Grönytefaktor och genomsläpplig mark är åtgärder i samma riktning inför skyfall och värmeböljor. Planens varning för dyra och krångliga regelverk drar åt motsatt håll, men sakinriktningen väger tyngre. Planen stöder därför kravet.
- greener cities and cleaner waterdecisive»Vi vill se fler grönområden nära där människor bor, renare vatten och mer biologisk mångfald.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to see more green areas near where people live, cleaner water and more biodiversity.”
- the polluter pays»Det ska alltid vara lönsamt att vara miljövårdande och olönsamt att agera miljöförstörande.« (party programme ↗)“It should always be profitable to be environmentally caring and unprofitable to act as an environmental destroyer.”
- fast climate action pays off»Snabba, konkreta åtgärder för klimatet lönar sig« (party programme ↗)“Fast, concrete climate action pays off”
- avoid complicated regulations»Klimatet kan inte vänta på dyra och krångliga regelverk.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Climate cannot wait for costly and complicated regulations.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan establishes that green spaces must have an obvious place in urban densification and that future societies shall be built in an environmentally sustainable way.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that green spaces must have an obvious place in urban densification and that future societies shall be built in an environmentally sustainable way. The counter-proposal's demand for local stormwater management and more urban greenery is in line with that, as is the commitment to clean water. At the same time the plan wants to simplify building regulations, which pulls in the opposite direction and makes the assessment uncertain.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att grönområden måste få en självklar plats vid förtätning av städer och att framtidens samhällen ska byggas miljömässigt hållbart. Motförslagets krav på lokal dagvattenhantering och mer stadsgrönska ligger i den linjen, liksom åtagandet om rent vatten. Samtidigt vill planen förenkla byggnormerna, vilket drar åt motsatt håll och gör bedömningen osäker.
- green spaces in densificationdecisive»Vid förtätning av städer måste grönområden få en självklar plats.« (party programme ↗)“In urban densification, green spaces must have an obvious place.”
- sustainable society building»Framtidens samhällen måste byggas på ett miljömässigt hållbart sätt.« (party programme ↗)“Future societies must be built in an environmentally sustainable manner.”
- clean water and water management»Alla har rätt till rent vatten.« (party programme ↗)“Everyone has a right to clean water.”
- simplified building regulations»Byggnormerna bör förenklas« (party programme ↗)“Building regulations should be simplified”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan states that unnecessary rules must not stand in the way of building and that the rule system must not create unnecessary obstacles to housing construction or to using one's property; legal requirements for stormwater management on one's own property and green space factor in all new construction are just such new obstacles.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan states that unnecessary rules must not stand in the way of building and that the rule system must not create unnecessary obstacles to housing construction or to using one's property; legal requirements for stormwater management on one's own property and green space factor in all new construction are just such new obstacles. The plan instead wants to reach the goals through environmentally adapted architecture and the value of urban greenery, which makes the stance uncertain.
Original (Swedish)
Planen säger att onödiga regler inte får stå i vägen för byggande och att regelsystem inte får skapa onödiga hinder för bostadsbyggande eller för att nyttja sin egendom; lagkrav på dagvattenhantering inom egen fastighet och grönytefaktor vid all nyproduktion är just sådana nya hinder. Planen vill i stället nå målen genom miljöanpassad arkitektur och värdet av stadsgrönska, vilket gör ställningstagandet osäkert.
- unnecessary rules hinder buildingdecisive»och onödiga regler får inte stå i vägen för en kommun« (party programme ↗)“and unnecessary rules must not stand in the way of a municipality”
- no obstacles to building»inte skapa onödiga hinder för bostadsbyggande och« (party programme ↗)“not create unnecessary obstacles for housing construction and”
- environmentally adapted architecture»Miljöanpassad arkitektur spelar en viktig roll för« (party programme ↗)“Environmentally adapted architecture plays an important role in”
- green areas for health»Även små grönytor i städerna fyller en viktig« (party programme ↗)“Even small green areas in cities serve an important”
The counter-proposal requires new legislation on stormwater management on private property, a mandatory green space factor in all new construction and regulation of permeable land.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The counter-proposal requires new legislation on stormwater management on private property, a mandatory green space factor in all new construction and regulation of permeable land. The plan goes in the opposite direction: the building regulations should be simplified with simpler building plans and red tape reduced, and the owner's right to use their property as they see fit should be guiding. Water problems in the plan are met with investments in water treatment, not with new requirements on property owners. The plan therefore rejects the requirement.
Original (Swedish)
Motförslaget kräver ny lagstiftning om dagvattenhantering på egen fastighet, obligatorisk grönytefaktor vid all nyproduktion och reglering av genomsläpplig mark. Planen går i motsatt riktning: byggregelverket ska förenklas med enklare byggplaner och regelkrånglet minskas, och ägarens rätt att använda sitt ägande efter eget huvud ska vara vägledande. Vattenproblemen möts i planen med satsningar på vattenrening, inte med nya krav på fastighetsägare. Planen avvisar därför kravet.
- simplified building processdecisive»Ersätta avancerade detaljplaner med enklare byggplaner« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Replace advanced detailed plans with simpler building plans”
- strong property rights»rätt att använda sitt ägande efter eget huvud ska vara vägledande.« (party programme ↗)“the owner's right to use their property as they see fit should be guiding.”
- reduced red tape»Ta bort en tredjedel av företagens administrationskostnader och en tredjedel av regelkrånglet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Remove one-third of companies' administrative costs and one-third of red tape”
- technology instead of new requirements»Satsa på forskning om vattenrening samt utbyggnad av avancerad vattenrening« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Invest in research on water treatment and expansion of advanced water treatment”
The plan wants to facilitate residential construction by simplifying processes and reviewing the extensive regulations and requirements that govern construction, and strengthen property rights.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to facilitate residential construction by simplifying processes and reviewing the extensive regulations and requirements that govern construction, and strengthen property rights. Legislating on stormwater management within own property, making green space factor mandatory in all new construction and regulating the share of permeable land instead add new requirements and costs to construction and property owners. The plan wants to achieve environmental benefit primarily through technical development and measures that provide most environment per krona.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill underlätta bostadsbyggande genom att förenkla processerna och se över de omfattande regelverk och krav som styr byggandet, samt stärka äganderätten. Att lagstifta om dagvattenhantering inom egen fastighet, göra grönytefaktor obligatorisk vid all nyproduktion och reglera andelen genomsläpplig mark lägger i stället nya krav och kostnader på byggande och fastighetsägare. Planen vill nå miljönytta främst genom teknisk utveckling och åtgärder som ger mest miljö per krona.
- fewer building requirementsdecisive»Sverigedemokraterna vill underlätta bostadsbyggande genom att förenkla och snabba på beslutsprocesser och se över de omfattande regelverk och krav som styr bostadsbyggande.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden Democrats want to facilitate residential construction by simplifying and speeding up decision processes and reviewing the extensive regulations and requirements that govern residential construction.”
- strengthened property rights»Stärka äganderätten« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strengthen property rights”
- technology before requirements»Målet om ett miljövänligare samhälle bör primärt uppnås genom teknisk utveckling,« (party programme ↗)“The goal of a more environmentally friendly society should primarily be achieved through technical development,”
- environment per krona»Sträva efter miljöeffektivitet och hitta de åtgärder som ger mest miljö per krona« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strive for environmental efficiency and find the measures that provide most environment per krona”
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2024/25:CU14)
- Committee report full text (HC01CU14)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2024/25:1011 — Tydliggörande att avvikelse enligt PBL prövas generöst av Kerstin Lundgren (C)
- Motion 2024/25:1058 — Möjliggör att ställa krav på återbruk i samband med rivningslov av Christofer Bergenblock (C)
- Motion 2024/25:1088 — Möjliggör energieffektiviseringar på beslutade detaljplaner av Alexandra Anstrell (M)
- Motion 2024/25:1113 — Klagande grannar som flyttat intill en skjutbana av Marléne Lund Kopparklint (M)
- Motion 2024/25:1184 — Gör Sveriges städer roligare av Niels Paarup-Petersen (C)
- Motion 2024/25:1224 — Låt bostadsintresset övertrumfa riksintressen av Larry Söder (KD)
- Motion 2024/25:1225 — Avgift för att överklaga planbeslut av Larry Söder (KD)
- Motion 2024/25:1287 — Retroaktiva säkerhetskrav på hissar i bostäder av Carita Boulwén (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1315 — Stärkande av naturen i våra stadsmiljöer av Katarina Luhr m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2024/25:1318 — Ett va-system för nutid och framtid av Katarina Luhr m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2024/25:1347 — Arkitekturfrågor av Anna-Lena Hedberg m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1383 — Planering och byggande av Mikael Eskilandersson m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1386 — Inriktning för bostadspolitiken av Mikael Eskilandersson m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1532 — Sportskytte och jakt av Marléne Lund Kopparklint (M)
- Motion 2024/25:1564 — CE-märkning av virke av Daniel Bäckström och Helena Lindahl (båda C)
- Motion 2024/25:1604 — Tidsgräns för domstolars handläggning av överklagande av detaljplaner m.m. av Ulrika Heie (C)
- Motion 2024/25:161 — Undantag från kravet på ett ladduttag för elbilar av Ingemar Kihlström (KD)
- Motion 2024/25:1617 — Turismöversiktplan av Martina Johansson och Elisabeth Thand Ringqvist (båda C)
- Motion 2024/25:1753 — Rivning och återbruk inom byggsektorn av Katarina Luhr m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2024/25:181 — Mer byggande på gamla detaljplaner av Catarina Deremar (C)
Source: The Swedish Parliament