2026-02-042025/26:KU19 · p.10KUConstitution
Transparency in the register of Riksdag members' financial interests
Online publication of the register of MPs' financial interests
What's at stake: The register is already a public document, but how easily the information can be accessed affects how well the public and media can scrutinise members' financial ties and detect possible conflicts of interest.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the information in the register of MPs' financial interests and commitments should be published on the Riksdag's website to make it more accessible, or whether the register should remain accessible only on request, as it is today.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee notes that the register of members' commitments and financial interests is already a public document that anyone can access, and maintains that there are no grounds for publishing the information on the Riksdag's website without the parties first reaching agreement on it. The committee recommends rejecting the motion.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 1 (S, V)
The reservation (S, V) calls for making the Riksdag's financial register more accessible by publishing the information on the Riksdag's website. The reasoning is that transparency is the strongest safeguard against corruption, conflicts of interest and improper influence, and that trust between elected representatives and citizens is essential in a democracy.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 1 by S, V.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have held
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: LLiberalerna
Ja 182–113Ja 168–127
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | No 1/18/0/3 | match | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| S | No | No 0/91/0/15 | match | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| MP | No | Yes 11/0/0/7 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| C | No | Yes 20/1/0/3 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| L | No | Yes 14/0/0/2 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| KD | No | Yes 14/0/0/5 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
| M | No | Yes 58/0/0/10 | differs | confidence: low | not addressed |
| SD | No | Yes 62/0/0/9 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
Broke with the party line
| VGudrun Nordborg (V, Västerbottens län) | Yes — party line: No |
| CAlireza Akhondi (C, Stockholms län) | No — party line: Yes |
MPs whose vote differs from their party's majority position in this division. Marked with a dark ring in the chamber view.
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects motion 2025/26:3721 by Jennie Nilsson et al. (S) item 11.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motion 2025/26:3721 av Jennie Nilsson m.fl. (S) yrkande 11.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag rejected approximately 50 proposals in motions from the general motion period 2025 concerning the Riksdag's working methods. The proposals concern, among other things, the opening of the Riksdag session, the right to submit motions, transparency in the register of Riksdag members' financial interests, review of elected representatives' conditions and the Riksdag Administration's activities. The Riksdag refers, among other things, to the fact that investigations are already underway in several of the issues covered by the proposals.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants the Parliament's economic register of members' interests to be published on Parliament's website for increased transparency. (S, V) — Reservation 1
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan counts the principle of public access and freedom of information among democracy's most important foundations and wants legal certainty to be upheld through public scrutiny and independent oversight.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan counts the principle of public access and freedom of information among democracy's most important foundations and wants legal certainty to be upheld through public scrutiny and independent oversight. Publishing members' economic interests on the web is a practical application of that line. The plan also explicitly warns of how economic power is converted into political power via lobbyists, which strengthens the reasons for open disclosure.
Original (Swedish)
Planen räknar offentlighetsprincipen och meddelarfriheten till demokratins viktigaste byggstenar och vill att rättssäkerheten upprätthålls genom medborgerlig insyn och oberoende granskning. Att publicera ledamöternas ekonomiska intressen på webben är en praktisk tillämpning av den linjen. Planen varnar dessutom uttryckligen för hur ekonomisk makt omsätts i politisk makt via lobbyister, vilket stärker skälen för öppen redovisning.
- the principle of public accessdecisive»meddelarfriheten och offentlighetsprincipen« (party programme ↗)“freedom of information and the principle of public access”
- public scrutiny»insyn och oberoende granskning.« (party programme ↗)“public scrutiny and independent oversight.”
- counter economic power influence»Överklassen omsätter sin ekonomiska makt i politisk makt genom« (party programme ↗)“The upper class converts its economic power into political power through”
- greater public scrutiny»Vi vill gå mot en större samhällelig insyn« (party programme ↗)“We want to move towards greater public scrutiny”
The party programme lifts prevention of corruption and improper influence as its own goal for democracy, and the party wants to expand the principle of publicity to all publicly financed activities.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme lifts prevention of corruption and improper influence as its own goal for democracy, and the party wants to expand the principle of publicity to all publicly financed activities. To publish board members' economic interests on a website is a step in that direction: transparency becomes real instead of formal. The plan supports the counter-proposal's demands, even though the specific publication form is not mentioned.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet lyfter förhindrande av korruption och otillbörlig påverkan som ett eget mål för demokratin, och partiet vill utvidga offentlighetsprincipen till all offentligt finansierad verksamhet. Att publicera ledamöternas ekonomiska intressen på en webbplats är ett steg i den riktningen: insynen görs verklig i stället för formell. Planen stöder därför motförslagets krav, även om just publiceringsformen inte nämns.
- counter corruptiondecisive»Förhindrande av korruption och otillbörlig påverkan.« (party programme ↗)“Prevention of corruption and improper influence.”
- broad principle of publicity»Offentlighetsprincip i all offentligt finansierad verksamhet.« (party programme ↗)“Principle of publicity in all publicly financed activities.”
- expanded transparency»Offentlighetsprincipen ska gälla även privat vård och omsorg.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The principle of publicity shall apply also to private care and health services.”
The plan establishes that power shall be divided and always scrutinized critically, and that public access and transparency are foundations of democracy.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that power shall be divided and always scrutinized critically, and that public access and transparency are foundations of democracy. Publishing members' financial interests on a website is precisely what makes such scrutiny practically possible for citizens. The plan also wishes to strengthen citizen influence, which presupposes easily accessible information about the elected representatives.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att makt ska delas och alltid granskas kritiskt och att offentlighet och insyn hör till demokratins grundvalar. Att publicera ledamöternas ekonomiska intressen på en webbplats är just det som gör en sådan granskning praktiskt möjlig för medborgarna. Planen vill dessutom stärka det medborgerliga inflytandet, vilket förutsätter lättillgänglig information om de folkvalda.
- power shall be critically scrutinizeddecisive»Överdriven maktkoncentration är odemokratiskt och korrumperar. Därför bör makt delas« (party programme ↗)“Excessive concentration of power is undemocratic and corrupts. Therefore, power should be divided”
- public access and transparency»offentlighetsprincipen samt meddelarfriheten ska gälla i hela unionen.« (party programme ↗)“the principle of public access and the right to disclose information shall apply throughout the union.”
- strengthened citizen influence»Vi i Miljöpartiet arbetar för att stärka och utveckla det medborgerliga inflytandet.« (party programme ↗)“We in the Green Party work to strengthen and develop citizen influence.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto requires that Sweden shall become even more transparent, with an anti-corruption agency, tightened anti-corruption rules and a lobby register.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto requires that Sweden shall become even more transparent, with an anti-corruption agency, tightened anti-corruption rules and a lobby register. Publishing members' financial interests on the web is the same kind of transparency measure against conflict of interest and improper influence that the counter-proposal seeks. The party programme makes openness and transparency a basic prerequisite for preventing corruption.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet kräver att Sverige ska bli ännu mer transparent, med antikorruptionsmyndighet, skärpta korruptionsregler och ett lobbyregister. Att publicera ledamöternas ekonomiska intressen på webben är samma slags öppenhetsåtgärd mot jäv och otillbörlig påverkan som motförslaget efterfrågar. Partiprogrammet gör öppenhet och transparens till en grundförutsättning för att förhindra korruption.
- transparency against corruptiondecisive»Sverige ska bli ännu mer transparent. Vi vill inrätta en antikorruptionsmyndighet, skärpa regler mot korruption och införa ett lobbyregister.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden shall become even more transparent. We want to establish an anti-corruption agency, tighten anti-corruption rules and introduce a lobby register.”
- openness prevents corruption»Öppenhet och transparens är grundförutsättningar för frihet, demokrati och för att förhindra korruption och övergrepp.« (party programme ↗)“Openness and transparency are basic prerequisites for freedom, democracy and for preventing corruption and abuse.”
- tightened rules against influence»De politiska partierna är sårbara mot påverkan och infiltration. Reglerna för finansiering av politiska partier bör skärpas och deras motståndskraft mot yttre påverkan och infiltration rustas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Political parties are vulnerable to influence and infiltration. Rules for financing political parties should be tightened and their resilience against external influence and infiltration strengthened.”
- openness as party ideal»Centerpartiet ska vara Sveriges mest öppna politiska parti.« (party programme ↗)“The Center Party shall be Sweden's most open political party.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The party programme states that diaries and public documents should to a greater extent be made available online to facilitate transparency, and that all public services that can be made digitally accessible at reasonable cost should also be made digitally accessible.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme states that diaries and public documents should to a greater extent be made available online to facilitate transparency, and that all public services that can be made digitally accessible at reasonable cost should also be made digitally accessible. Publishing elected officials' economic interests on a website is precisely this. The plan also demands regulation-based transparency about party financing, which rests on the same transparency thinking.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet slår fast att diarier och allmänna handlingar i större utsträckning bör göras tillgängliga på nätet för att underlätta insyn, och att allt offentligt som till rimlig kostnad kan göras digitalt tillgängligt också ska göras det. Att publicera ledamöternas ekonomiska intressen på en webbplats är precis detta. Planen kräver dessutom lagreglerad öppenhet om partiernas finansiering, vilket vilar på samma transparenstanke.
- documents accessible onlinedecisive»Diarier och allmänna handlingar bör i större utsträckning göras tillgängliga på nätet för att underlätta insyn.« (party programme ↗)“Diaries and public documents should to a greater extent be made available online to facilitate transparency.”
- digital accessibility as principle»En central princip är därför att alla offentliga funktioner som till en rimlig kostnad kan göras digitalt tillgängliga också ska göras digitalt tillgängliga.« (party programme ↗)“A central principle is therefore that all public functions that at reasonable cost can be made digitally accessible shall also be made digitally accessible.”
- transparency enables scrutiny»Offentlighetsprincipen har en grundläggande betydelse för att förankra och fördjupa folkstyret, och är en förutsättning för granskning och debatt.« (party programme ↗)“The principle of public access has a fundamental significance for anchoring and deepening popular government, and is a prerequisite for scrutiny and debate.”
- transparency about political financing»Partiernas skyldighet att redovisa källorna för sin finansiering ska vara reglerad i lag.« (party programme ↗)“Parties' obligation to disclose the sources of their financing shall be regulated by law.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The party programme makes the principle of public access central to an open democracy and requires that secrecy be used restrictively, while there must be effective means against abuse of power.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme makes the principle of public access central to an open democracy and requires that secrecy be used restrictively, while there must be effective means against abuse of power. Publishing a register that is already a public record on a website makes transparency real and is therefore an application of these commitments. The plan's requirement to respect personal integrity when handling personal data sets a limit, but weighs less when it comes to elected representatives' own conflicts of interest.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet gör offentlighetsprincipen central för en öppen demokrati och kräver att sekretessmöjligheten nyttjas restriktivt, samtidigt som det ska finnas effektiva medel mot maktmissbruk. Att publicera ett register som redan är allmän handling på en webbplats gör insynen reell och är därför en tillämpning av dessa åtaganden. Planens krav på respekt för personlig integritet vid hantering av personuppgifter sätter en gräns men väger lättare när det gäller folkvaldas egna intressekonflikter.
- principle of public accessdecisive»Offentlighetsprincipen, det vill säga tillgången till allmänna handlingar, är central för en öppen och vital demokrati.« (party programme ↗)“The principle of public access, that is access to public records, is central to an open and vital democracy.”
- restrictive secrecy»Sekretessmöjligheten ska nyttjas restriktivt.« (party programme ↗)“Secrecy shall be used restrictively.”
- means against abuse of power»Det måste finnas effektiva medel mot maktmissbruk och maktkoncentration.« (party programme ↗)“There must be effective means against abuse of power and concentration of power.”
- protection for personal integrity»Den personliga integriteten ska ha ett starkt grundlagsskydd och det offentliga måste tillämpa stor försiktighet och respekt för den personliga integriteten vid hantering av personuppgifter.« (party programme ↗)“Personal integrity shall have strong constitutional protection and the public must apply great caution and respect for personal integrity when handling personal data.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan says nothing about the register of members' financial interests.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan says nothing about the register of members' financial interests. The nearest commitments are to clarify how responsibility can be demanded for public decisions and to sharpen civil servant liability, and the principle that public power shall be subject to constitutional, political and media scrutiny. Publishing the data on a website makes such scrutiny easier and is thus in line with the plan, even if without explicit support.
Original (Swedish)
Planen säger inget om registret över ledamöternas ekonomiska intressen. Närmast liggande åtaganden är att förtydliga hur ansvar kan utkrävas för offentliga beslut och att skärpa tjänstemannaansvaret, samt principen att den offentliga makten ska vara underkastad konstitutionell, politisk och medial granskning. Att publicera uppgifterna på en webbplats gör den granskningen enklare och ligger därmed i linje med planen, om än utan uttryckligt stöd.
- accountability for public decisionsdecisive»Vi ser stora behov av att förstärka domstolarnas oberoende och förtydliga hur ansvar kan utkrävas för offentliga beslut.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We see major needs to strengthen the independence of the courts and clarify how responsibility can be demanded for public decisions.”
- scrutiny of public power»Den är lagstyrd, professionell och underkastad konstitutionell, politisk« (party programme ↗)“It is statutory, professional and subject to constitutional, political”
- sharpened civil servant liability»Skärpa tjänstemannaansvaret så att du som skattebetalare vet att med all offentlig maktutövning följer ett ansvar för de beslut som fattas« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sharpen civil servant liability so you as a taxpayer know that all public exercise of power is followed by responsibility for the decisions made”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan's democracy section establishes that measures should be taken to increase transparency and the possibility of political accountability, and that official responsibility should be introduced.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's democracy section establishes that measures should be taken to increase transparency and the possibility of political accountability, and that official responsibility should be introduced. Publishing members' financial interests on a website is such a transparency measure. The plan also wants to counter systems that invite fraud and corruption. Therefore, the plan supports the counter-proposal's demands.
Original (Swedish)
Planens demokratiavsnitt slår fast att åtgärder ska genomföras för att öka transparensen och möjligheten till politiskt ansvarsutkrävande, och att tjänstemannaansvar ska införas. Att publicera ledamöternas ekonomiska intressen på en webbplats är en sådan transparensåtgärd. Planen vill också motverka system som lockar till fusk och korruption. Därför stöder planen motförslagets krav.
- increased transparency and accountabilitydecisive»Tjänstemannaansvar ska införas och åtgärder ska genomföras för att öka transparensen och möjligheten att utkräva politiskt ansvarsutkrävande.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Official responsibility shall be introduced and measures shall be taken to increase transparency and the possibility to demand political accountability.”
- counter corruption-promoting systems»Både fusk och sådana system som tenderar att locka till fusk och korruption ska motverkas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Both fraud and systems that tend to invite fraud and corruption should be countered.”
- accountability for public funds»Sverigedemokraterna vill stärka möjligheter för ansvarsutkrävande när hanteringen av de offentliga resurserna brister.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden Democrats want to strengthen possibilities for accountability when the management of public resources fails.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2025/26:KU19)
- Committee report full text (HD01KU19)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2025/26:1041 — Al-nakba av Jamal El-Haj (-)
- Motion 2025/26:1056 — Fira Sveriges statschef H.M. Konung Carl XVI Gustafs 80-årsdag med ett porträtt i Sveriges riksdag av Marie-Louise Hänel Sandström m.fl. (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1058 — Dag Hammarskjölds fotokonst av Gudrun Brunegård (KD)
- Motion 2025/26:1092 — Avskaffa allmänna motionstiden av Fredrik Lundh Sammeli m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1406 — Översyn av riksdagsledamöters arbete i syfte att göra det enklare att använda tiden effektivt av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1436 — Ett data- och digitaliseringsutskott i riksdagen av Markus Selin (S)
- Motion 2025/26:152 — Svenska flaggan som gåva från riksdagen eller dess ledamöter till allmänheten av Eric Palmqvist (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:1524 — Stärkt demokrati - mot hot och förföljelse av förtroendevalda, tjänstemän och minoriteter av Emma Ahlström Köster (M)
- Motion 2025/26:153 — Hörselskadade och riksdagen av Eric Palmqvist (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:1539 — Öppen licensiering av riksdagens information av Niels Paarup-Petersen (C)
- Motion 2025/26:1542 — Avskaffande av riktkarlssystemet i riksdagen av Alireza Akhondi (C)
- Motion 2025/26:1549 — Hantering av enskilda motioner av Alireza Akhondi (C)
- Motion 2025/26:1624 — Inrättande av ett omställningsutskott i riksdagen av Magnus Manhammar m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1663 — Tjänstgöring för riksdagsledamöter inom totalförsvaret eller samhällsviktiga områden under sommaren av Carl Nordblom (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1689 — Ledamöters placering i plenisalen av Margareta Cederfelt (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1877 — Riksdagens resebidragssystem för skolbesök av Laila Naraghi (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1992 — Upprätta bättre säkerhet utanför riksdagshusen av Sten Bergheden och Johanna Rantsi (båda M)
- Motion 2025/26:2517 — Minnesplats för Dag Hammarskjöld i riksdagen av Morgan Johansson (S)
- Motion 2025/26:2557 — Inrättande av ett utskott för kommunala och regionala frågor av Mattias Eriksson Falk och Roger Hedlund (båda SD)
- Motion 2025/26:276 — Ändring i grundlagen och avlägsnande av EU-symbol i riksdagens plenisal av Björn Söder (SD)
Source: The Swedish Parliament