2025-04-092024/25:KU26 · p.20KUConstitution
Pensioners' council
Mandatory senior citizen councils in municipalities and regions
What's at stake: The outcome affects older people's ability to have influence and insight into matters concerning their living conditions, in the municipalities and regions that currently lack such councils.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether it should become mandatory for municipalities and regions to set up senior citizen councils to give older people influence, or whether this should remain voluntary for each municipality and region to decide.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee notes that citizen councils for older people already exist in most municipalities and regions and therefore sees no reason to make senior citizen councils mandatory. The Riksdag therefore rejects the motion.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 8 (S)
The reservation (S) calls for making it mandatory for municipalities and regions to establish senior citizen councils, which through consultation between senior organisations and municipal boards and committees would give older people influence and insight into matters concerning their living conditions. The reasoning is that society needs to get better at drawing on older people's skills and experience.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 8 by S.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
What each plan points to — and how the party voted
For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| Plan | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Yes 20/0/0/4 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| S | No | No 0/93/0/13 | follows the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| MP | No | Yes 14/0/0/4 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| C | Yes | Yes 19/0/0/5 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| L | No | Yes 13/0/0/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| KD | No | Yes 15/0/0/4 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | derived |
| M | Yes | Yes 60/0/0/8 | follows the plan | confidence: low | derived |
| SD | No | Yes 62/0/0/10 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motion 2024/25:3022 by Fredrik Lundh Sammeli et al. (S) demand 82.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motion 2024/25:3022 av Fredrik Lundh Sammeli m.fl. (S) yrkande 82.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag said no to approximately 40 proposals in motions on municipal and regional matters from the general motion period 2024. The proposals deal, for example, with municipal cooperation and competence, the number of members and deputies in the municipal council and municipal party support. The Riksdag refers, among other things, to the fact that work is already underway within the areas covered by the motions.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to make it mandatory for municipalities and regions to establish pension boards to give pensioners influence. (S) — Reservation 8
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan wants democratic processes to permeate all of society and for everyone, regardless of how we function, to be able to participate and be treated as the people they are.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants democratic processes to permeate all of society and for everyone, regardless of how we function, to be able to participate and be treated as the people they are. That dependence on care should not limit the ability to control one's life speaks for guaranteeing older people influence and insight into issues that affect them. Mandatory pensioner councils are such a form of popular influence.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill att demokratiska processer genomsyrar hela samhället och att alla, oavsett hur vi fungerar, kan vara delaktiga och bemötas som de personer de är. Att beroendet av omsorg inte ska begränsa möjligheten att styra över sitt liv talar för att äldre garanteras inflytande och insyn i frågor som rör dem. Obligatoriska pensionärsråd är en sådan form av folkligt inflytande.
- democracy permeates societydecisive»Vi vill gå i riktning mot ett samhälle där demokratiska processer genomsyrar hela samhället« (party programme ↗)“We want to move towards a society where democratic processes permeate all of society”
- self-determination in care»Att du är beroende av omsorg ska inte, som idag, begränsa dina möjligheter att styra över ditt liv.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“That you are dependent on care should not, as it does today, limit your ability to control your own life.”
- participation for everyone»Alla behöver kunna vara delaktiga i samhället, bli bemötta för den person de är« (party programme ↗)“Everyone needs to be able to participate in society, be treated as the people they are”
- spaces for popular influence»Det behövs gott om utrymmen för folkliga politiska diskussioner som kan mynna ut i genomtänkta beslut.« (party programme ↗)“There is a need for plenty of spaces for popular political discussion that can result in well-considered decisions.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The party programme states that everyone has equal right to influence social development and that politics shall be formed in a living dialogue with civil society, and the election manifesto that it shall be safe to grow old in Sweden.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme states that everyone has equal right to influence social development and that politics shall be formed in a living dialogue with civil society, and the election manifesto that it shall be safe to grow old in Sweden. Mandatory pensioner councils are a means for such influence and insight for older people. The documents say nothing about mandatory consultation bodies in municipalities, so the conclusion is derived.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet slår fast att alla har lika rätt att påverka samhällets utveckling och att politiken ska formas i en levande dialog med civilsamhället, och valmanifestet att det ska vara tryggt att åldras i Sverige. Obligatoriska pensionärsråd är ett medel för sådant inflytande och insyn för äldre. Dokumenten säger inget om obligatoriska samrådsorgan i kommunerna, så slutsatsen är härledd.
- equal right to influencedecisive»Alla har lika rätt att påverka samhällets utveckling.« (party programme ↗)“Everyone has equal right to influence social development.”
- dialogue with civil society»formas i en levande dialog med det civila samhälle« (party programme ↗)“formed in a living dialogue with civil society”
- safe aging»Det ska vara tryggt att åldras i Sverige.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It shall be safe to grow old in Sweden.”
- respect for social movements»Samhällsarbetet måste bygga på tilltro till och respekt för« (party programme ↗)“Society's work must be based on confidence in and respect for”
The plan establishes that elderly people's knowledge and experience are invaluable, that a rich life is characterized by self-determination and participation and that personal power and influence over welfare should be strengthened.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that elderly people's knowledge and experience are invaluable, that a rich life is characterized by self-determination and participation and that personal power and influence over welfare should be strengthened. Mandatory pensioner councils are a means for such influence. At the same time, the plan is decentralist and does not take a position on mandatory municipal bodies, which makes the position uncertain.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att äldres kunskaper och erfarenheter är ovärderliga, att ett rikt liv kännetecknas av självbestämmande och deltagande och att egenmakten och inflytandet över välfärden ska stärkas. Obligatoriska pensionärsråd är ett medel för sådant inflytande. Samtidigt är planen decentralistisk och tar inte ställning till obligatoriska kommunala organ, vilket gör ställningstagandet osäkert.
- elderly people's experience as a resourcedecisive»Äldres kunskaper och erfarenheter är ovärderliga« (party programme ↗)“Elderly people's knowledge and experience are invaluable”
- strengthened influence over welfare»och inflytandet över välfärden.« (party programme ↗)“and influence over welfare.”
- self-determination and participation»Ett rikt liv kännetecknas av självbestämmande,« (party programme ↗)“A rich life is characterized by self-determination,”
- participating citizens»Vi tror på en demokrati med aktiva och delaktiga« (party programme ↗)“We believe in democracy with active and participating”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan is based on decisions being made as close to those affected as possible and that decisions concerning only the local level should not be moved up.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan is based on decisions being made as close to those affected as possible and that decisions concerning only the local level should not be moved up. A state requirement for pensioner councils moves precisely such a decision from the municipality to the Riksdag. The plan certainly wants to increase user influence, but argues against the requirement for mandatory regulation.
Original (Swedish)
Planen bygger på att beslut ska fattas så nära de berörda som möjligt och att beslut som bara rör den lokala nivån inte ska flyttas uppåt. Ett statligt obligatorium för pensionärsråd flyttar just ett sådant beslut från kommunen till riksdagen. Planen vill visserligen öka brukarinflytandet, men talar emot kravet på tvingande reglering.
- decentralized decision-makingdecisive»Decentralisera mera. Människor ska få bestämma mer själva, och politiska beslut ska fattas nära dem som berörs.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Decentralize further. People shall be allowed to decide more themselves, and political decisions shall be made close to those affected.”
- the proximity principle»beslut i första hand ska fattas av människor själva, eller så nära den enskilda människan som möjligt« (party programme ↗)“decisions should first and foremost be made by people themselves, or as close to the individual as possible”
- no decisions moved up»Beslut som endast berör en mer lokal nivå, eller bara individen själv, bör inte flyttas upp till en högre nivå,« (party programme ↗)“Decisions that only concern a more local level, or only the individual themselves, should not be moved up to a higher level,”
- increased user influence»att öka brukarinflytandet så att de som går i skolan, eller de som har behov av omsorg« (party programme ↗)“to increase user influence so that those who go to school, or those who need care”
The plan asserts the elderly's right to self-determination and wants citizens' knowledge to be utilized even between elections through systematic citizen dialogue.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan asserts the elderly's right to self-determination and wants citizens' knowledge to be utilized even between elections through systematic citizen dialogue. Mandatory pensioner councils are a concrete form for that influence. At the same time the plan wants to give municipalities greater freedom to try their own organizational forms, which pulls in the opposite direction and makes the assessment uncertain.
Original (Swedish)
Planen hävdar äldres rätt till självbestämmande och vill att medborgarnas kunskaper tas tillvara även mellan valen genom systematisk medborgardialog. Obligatoriska pensionärsråd är en konkret form för det inflytandet. Samtidigt vill planen ge kommunerna större frihet att pröva egna organisationsformer, vilket drar åt motsatt håll och gör bedömningen osäker.
- elderly's self-determinationdecisive»Äldres rätt till självbestämmande ska hävdas och alla tendenser till åldersfördomar bekämpas.« (party programme ↗)“The elderly's right to self-determination shall be upheld and all tendencies to age discrimination shall be combated.”
- systematic citizen dialogue»En systematisk medborgardialog bidrar till att medborgarnas kunskaper och intresse tas tillvara« (party programme ↗)“A systematic citizen dialogue contributes to citizens' knowledge and interest being utilized”
- active citizens»Demokratin förutsätter aktiva medborgare och ett levande demokratiskt samtal.« (party programme ↗)“Democracy presupposes active citizens and a living democratic conversation.”
- municipal organizational freedom»lättare för kommuner att under en försöksperiod pröva nya organisationsformer.« (party programme ↗)“easier for municipalities to during a trial period try new organizational forms.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan establishes that older people's influence through pensioner associations shall be encouraged and that older people are an asset whose experience should benefit the whole of society.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that older people's influence through pensioner associations shall be encouraged and that older people are an asset whose experience should benefit the whole of society. The election manifesto is moreover prepared to impose obligations on all municipalities for the elderly. That speaks for a mandatory pensioner council, although the plan's strong municipal self-government points the other way.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att äldres inflytande genom pensionärsföreningar ska uppmuntras och att de äldre är en tillgång vars erfarenhet bör komma hela samhället till del. Valmanifestet är dessutom berett att ålägga alla kommuner uppgifter för de äldre. Det talar för ett obligatoriskt pensionärsråd, även om planens starka kommunala självstyrelse drar åt motsatt håll.
- older people's influencedecisive»Äldres inflytande i form av patient-, pensionärs- eller brukarföreningar ska uppmuntras.« (party programme ↗)“Older people's influence in the form of patient, pensioner or user associations shall be encouraged.”
- commitments in all municipalities»Bryt äldres ofrivilliga ensamhet och isolering genom äldresamtal i alla kommuner« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Break older people's involuntary loneliness and isolation through elderly conversations in all municipalities”
- older people's experience as resource»De äldre utgör en stor tillgång. De representerar en« (party programme ↗)“Older people are a great asset. They represent”
- strong municipal self-government»Den kommunala självstyrelsen ska vara stark« (party programme ↗)“Municipal self-government shall be strong”
flags: citat_migrerat
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan takes no position on pensioner councils.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan takes no position on pensioner councils. The nearest principles speak against mandatory obligation: decisions should be made at the lowest possible level and municipalities and regions should be allowed to choose different paths according to their circumstances, whereas a large state produces a weaker society. The plan also values older people's right to a secure and dignified old age, but not through mandatory bodies. The plan therefore rejects the requirement.
Original (Swedish)
Planen tar inte ställning till pensionärsråd. Närmast liggande principer talar mot ett lagstadgat tvång: beslut ska fattas på lägsta möjliga nivå och kommuner och regioner ska tillåtas välja olika vägar utifrån sina förutsättningar, medan en stor stat ger ett svagare samhälle. Planen värnar samtidigt äldres rätt till en trygg och värdig ålderdom, men inte genom obligatoriska organ. Planen avvisar därför kravet.
- decisions at lowest leveldecisive»Beslut ska fattas på lägsta möjliga nivå, så nära medborgarna som möjligt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Decisions should be made at the lowest possible level, as close to citizens as possible.”
- municipal freedom of action»tillåta att olika regioner och kommuner väljer« (party programme ↗)“allow different regions and municipalities to choose”
- limited state apparatus»En stor stat leder till ett svagare samhälle.« (party programme ↗)“A large state leads to a weaker society.”
- dignified old age»Äldre har en självklar rätt till en trygg och värdig ålderdom« (party programme ↗)“Older people have a clear right to a secure and dignified old age”
The plan requires that demands be placed on elder advocates in each municipality who should work together with the municipality's pensioners and their organisations.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that demands be placed on elder advocates in each municipality who should work together with the municipality's pensioners and their organisations. It thus accepts national demands on municipalities to give older people influence, which is exactly what the counter-proposal demands. The municipal self-determination is at the same time a principle that argues against an obligation, which reduces the certainty.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att det ställs krav på äldreombudsmän i varje kommun som ska arbeta tillsammans med kommunens pensionärer och deras organisationer. Den accepterar därmed nationella krav på kommunerna för att ge äldre inflytande, vilket är just vad motförslaget begär. Det kommunala självbestämmandet är samtidigt en princip som talar emot obligatorium, vilket dämpar säkerheten.
- demands on elder advocatesdecisive»Se krav på äldreombudsmän i varje kommun« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Place demands on elder advocates in each municipality”
- elderly organisations in the municipality»Vi vill se äldreombudsmän ute i kommunerna, som aktivt ska arbeta tillsammans med kommunens pensionärer och organisationer för att uppmuntra till sociala aktiviteter och hälsofrämjande insatser.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to see elder advocates in municipalities who should actively work together with the municipality's pensioners and organisations to encourage social activities and health-promoting measures.”
- society's obligation to the elderly»Dagens pensionärer har byggt Sverige och bidragit till att skapa ett fantastiskt land för oss att leva i.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Today's pensioners have built Sweden and contributed to creating a fantastic country for us to live in.”
- municipal self-government»Vi betraktar det kommunala självbestämmandet som en central del av demokratin« (party programme ↗)“We regard municipal self-determination as a central part of democracy”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2024/25:KU26)
- Committee report full text (HC01KU26)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2024/25:1043 — Åtgärder mot kommunalt befogenhetsöverskridande i utrikespolitiska frågor av Magnus Berntsson (KD)
- Motion 2024/25:1377 — Några valfrågor av Matheus Enholm m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1379 — Kommunpolitik av Matheus Enholm m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1493 — Öppna omröstningar i kommunfullmäktige av Dan Hovskär (KD)
- Motion 2024/25:190 — Möjliggörande av fler folkinitiativ av Jonas Andersson (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:2244 — Återkallande av uppdrag i styrelser, nämnder med mera för förtroendevalda som blivit vildar i kommun- och regionfullmäktige av Mattias Eriksson Falk m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:2246 — Reglera utskott i kommunallagen av Mattias Eriksson Falk och Roger Hedlund (båda SD)
- Motion 2024/25:2250 — Krav på folkomröstning vid förslag om sammanslagning av kommuner och regioner av Mattias Eriksson Falk och Roger Hedlund (båda SD)
- Motion 2024/25:2263 — Utökning av antalet ersättare i kommunfullmäktige av Mattias Eriksson Falk och Roger Hedlund (båda SD)
- Motion 2024/25:2285 — Utökad möjlighet att behålla förtroendeuppdrag vid tillfällig flytt för studier av Mattias Eriksson Falk och Roger Hedlund (båda SD)
- Motion 2024/25:2304 — Översyn av 37 och 38 §§ kommunallagen av Mats Wiking m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2024/25:2350 — Tomma stolar i kommunfullmäktige av Johan Andersson m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2024/25:2585 — Avpolitisera den kommunala revisionen av Boriana Åberg (M)
- Motion 2024/25:277 — Öppna omröstningar i kommunfullmäktige - en demokratifråga av Gudrun Brunegård (KD)
- Motion 2024/25:2955 — Livskraft och framtidstro på Sveriges landsbygder av Muharrem Demirok m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2024/25:2963 — Förtroendevaldas närvaro av Markus Wiechel och Alexander Christiansson (båda SD)
- Motion 2024/25:3022 — Utgiftsområde 9 Hälsovård, sjukvård och social omsorg av Fredrik Lundh Sammeli m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2024/25:472 — Kommunjurist som lyder under oppositionen av Josef Fransson (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:476 — Sänkta partistöd för en stärkt demokrati av Josef Fransson (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:633 — Komplettering av kommunallagens bestämmelser om ledighet från anställning för förtroendevalda av Mattias Eriksson Falk och Roger Hedlund (båda SD)
Source: The Swedish Parliament