2024-02-072023/24:TU6 · p.2TUTransport & infrastructure
Organization of railway maintenance
In-house state railway maintenance
What's at stake: The decision affects how railway maintenance is organized and how the Transport Administration's own expertise and purchasing capability develop, which in turn shapes how robust, reliable and punctual rail traffic is for passengers and freight.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the state, through the Swedish Transport Administration, should carry out a larger share of railway maintenance in-house to build up expertise, or whether today's deregulated model of competitively procured maintenance should be kept.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee shares the government's view that the deregulated railway market has contributed to a positive development of railway maintenance, but considers that the Transport Administration needs the right expertise to maintain the infrastructure in the best way and act as an effective purchaser. The committee therefore rejects the motions calling for more maintenance to be carried out in-house.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 2 (S)
The reservation (S) wants the government to look into the possibility for the state to carry out a larger share of railway maintenance in-house. The reasoning is that the deregulated railway has led the state to lose its own expertise in the area, that preventive maintenance is cheaper than corrective maintenance, and that greater in-house expertise is needed for a robust Swedish railway.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 2 by S.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have gone the other way
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: VVänsterpartiet
Ja 96–89Nej 78–107
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Yes 18/0/0/6 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| S | No | No 0/89/0/18 | match | confidence: medium | derived |
| MP | No | Abstain 0/0/11/7 | differs | confidence: high | derived |
| C | Yes | Abstain 0/0/20/4 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
| L | Yes | Yes 11/0/0/5 | match | confidence: medium | derived |
| KD | No | Yes 12/0/0/7 | differs | confidence: low | derived |
| M | Yes | Yes 55/0/0/13 | match | confidence: medium | derived |
| SD | No | Abstain 0/0/62/10 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
Committee proposal
Parliament rejects the motions 2023/24:400 by Patrik Jönsson et al. (SD) point 2, 2023/24:1577 by Mattias Vepsä (S), 2023/24:1878 by Daniel Helldén et al. (MP) point 3, 2023/24:2465 by Ulrika Heie et al. (C) point 38 and 2023/24:2625 by Gunilla Svantorp et al. (S) point 25.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2023/24:400 av Patrik Jönsson m.fl. (SD) yrkande 2, 2023/24:1577 av Mattias Vepsä (S), 2023/24:1878 av Daniel Helldén m.fl. (MP) yrkande 3, 2023/24:2465 av Ulrika Heie m.fl. (C) yrkande 38 och 2023/24:2625 av Gunilla Svantorp m.fl. (S) yrkande 25.
Riksdag decision: Parliament rejected approximately 60 proposals in motions regarding railway matters from the general motion period 2023. Parliament refers, among other things, to completed or ongoing initiatives in the field. The motions concern, among other things, the organization of railway maintenance, the railway's signal system, railway protection and the Arlanda rail link.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants the state to increase the share of railway maintenance performed in-house. (S) — Reservation 2
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan demands that publicly important activities and infrastructure that have been privatised be taken back and that public ownership is strong in key sectors such as transport systems.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan demands that publicly important activities and infrastructure that have been privatised be taken back and that public ownership is strong in key sectors such as transport systems. Increasingly carrying out railway maintenance in-house and reclaiming lost expertise is exactly this. The plan explicitly opposes the market rules the committee relies on when evaluating deregulation as positive.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att samhällsviktig verksamhet och infrastruktur som privatiserats tas tillbaka och att samhällsägandet är starkt i nyckelsektorer som transportsystem. Att i ökad utsträckning utföra järnvägsunderhållet i egen regi och återta förlorad kompetens är just detta. Planen vänder sig uttryckligen mot de marknadsregler utskottet lutar sig mot när det bedömer avregleringen som positiv.
- reclaim privatised activitiesdecisive»Det är hög tid att agera och ta tillbaka den samhällsviktiga verksamhet och infrastruktur som har privatiserats.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It is high time to act and take back the publicly important activities and infrastructure that have been privatised.”
- publicly owned transport infrastructure»transportsystem, kommunikationer och övrig infrastruktur, finansiell sektor, bostadsproduktion, energiförsörjning, strategiska naturtillgångar och så vidare. Samhällsägda företag ska vara föredömen« (party programme ↗)“transport systems, communications and other infrastructure, financial sector, housing production, energy supply, strategic natural resources and so on. Publicly owned companies should be the model”
- challenge market-fundamentalist rules»tjänster ska premiera effektiv energianvändning och hållbara lösningar. Miljöarbetet ska ta hänsyn till landsbygdens behov. De marknadsfundamentalistiska konkurrens- och frihandelsregler som försvårar« (party programme ↗)“services should reward efficient energy use and sustainable solutions. Environmental work must take rural needs into account. The market-fundamentalist competition and free-trade rules that complicate”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan sees market experiments as having gone too far and wants society to take back control of socially important activities, with democracy's priority before the market.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan sees market experiments as having gone too far and wants society to take back control of socially important activities, with democracy's priority before the market. To an increasing extent carrying out railway maintenance in-house to reclaim competence and get a robust railway is in line with this and with the plan's massive rail investments. The plan moreover emphasizes readiness in the transport sector, which requires own capability.
Original (Swedish)
Planen ser marknadsexperiment som gått för långt och vill att samhället tar tillbaka kontrollen över samhällsviktig verksamhet, med demokratins företräde före marknaden. Att i ökad utsträckning utföra järnvägsunderhåll i egen regi för att återta kompetens och få en robust järnväg ligger i linje med detta och med planens massiva järnvägsinvesteringar. Planen betonar dessutom beredskapen i transportsektorn, vilket kräver egen förmåga.
- society takes back controldecisive»Samhället ska flytta fram positionerna för att ta tillbaka kontrollen över utvecklingen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Society should advance positions to take back control of development.”
- democracy's priority before the market»Demokratin har därför företräde före marknaden.« (party programme ↗)“Democracy therefore has priority before the market.”
- robust railway through investments»Genom massiva investeringar i både ny och befintlig järnväg kommer fler att kunna resa klimatsmart med tåg.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Through massive investments in both new and existing railways, more people will be able to travel in a climate-smart way by train.”
- readiness in the transport sector»och öka beredskapen i transportsektorn.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“and increase readiness in the transport sector.”
The party programme wants parts of the railway system to be re-regulated to achieve an optimal and long-term functioning transport system, and that society itself controls and funds infrastructure expansion.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme wants parts of the railway system to be re-regulated to achieve an optimal and long-term functioning transport system, and that society itself controls and funds infrastructure expansion. The plan also establishes that one should be able to rely on the railway and that the tracks must therefore be maintained. To review increased maintenance in-house, to regain expertise and prioritize preventive maintenance, follows from these commitments.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet vill att järnvägssystemet till vissa delar återregleras för att bli optimalt och långsiktigt fungerande, och att samhället självt styr och står för utbyggnaden av infrastrukturen. Planen slår också fast att man ska kunna lita på järnvägen och att spåren därför måste underhållas. Att se över ökat underhåll i egen regi, för att återta kompetens och prioritera förebyggande underhåll, följer av dessa åtaganden.
- re-regulation of the railwaydecisive»delar återregleras för att få ett optimalt och långsiktigt fungerande transportsystem.« (party programme ↗)“parts are re-regulated to achieve an optimal and long-term functioning transport system.”
- reliable railway requires maintenance»Man ska kunna lita på järnvägen. Därför måste« (party programme ↗)“One should be able to rely on the railway. Therefore must”
- societal responsibility for infrastructure»Samhället måste själv styra och stå för utbyggnad« (party programme ↗)“Society must itself control and provide for expansion”
- upgraded railway network»bygga ut och rusta upp järnvägsnätet för snabba tåg i hela landet och skynda på bygget av nya stambanor för höghastighetståg.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“build out and upgrade the railway network for fast trains throughout the country and accelerate construction of new main lines for high-speed trains.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The party programme sees competition as an important driving force, believes that public activities can advantageously be opened to competition and wants a market economy free from centrally planned directives.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme sees competition as an important driving force, believes that public activities can advantageously be opened to competition and wants a market economy free from centrally planned directives. To increasingly take rail maintenance back in-house goes against this. The plan's means for a robust railway is instead upgrading and higher standards on the tracks.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet ser konkurrens som en viktig drivkraft, menar att offentlig verksamhet med fördel kan konkurrensutsättas och vill en marknadsekonomi fri från planekonomiska pekpinnar. Att i ökad utsträckning återta järnvägsunderhållet i egen regi går emot detta. Planens medel för en robust järnväg är i stället upprustning och högre standard på banorna.
- competition as driving forcedecisive»Konkurrens är en viktig drivkraft för utvecklingen av marknadsekonomin.« (party programme ↗)“Competition is an important driving force for the development of a market economy.”
- open public activities to competition»Offentlig verksamhet kan med fördel konkurrensutsättas« (party programme ↗)“Public activities can advantageously be opened to competition”
- upgraded railway»höja standarden på det nationella stambanenätet i hela landet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“raise the standard on the national backbone railway network throughout the country”
flags: citat_blockerat
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan establishes that the public sector shall not operate activities that crowd out functioning private alternatives and shall only operate business activities when there is a strong public interest.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that the public sector shall not operate activities that crowd out functioning private alternatives and shall only operate business activities when there is a strong public interest. The counter-proposal's requirement for increased railway maintenance in its own administration goes in the opposite direction. The plan's answer to railway shortcomings is instead renovation and expansion, and building away the bottlenecks.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att det offentliga inte ska driva verksamhet som tränger ut fungerande privata alternativ och bara ska driva affärsverksamhet vid ett starkt samhällsintresse. Motförslagets krav på ökat järnvägsunderhåll i egen regi går i motsatt riktning. Planens svar på järnvägens brister är i stället upprustning och utbyggnad samt att flaskhalsarna byggs bort.
- do not crowd out private alternativesdecisive»offentliga ska inte driva verksamheter som tränger ut fungerande privata alternativ eller försvårar« (party programme ↗)“public shall not operate activities that crowd out functioning private alternatives or complicate”
- restricted state enterprise»Det offentliga ska endast driva affärsverksamhet om det finns ett starkt samhällsintresse.« (party programme ↗)“The public sector shall only operate business activities if there is a strong public interest.”
- renovated railway»persontransporter är i starkt behov av upprustning och utbyggnad, liksom vissa delar av vägnätet.« (party programme ↗)“passenger transport is in urgent need of renovation and expansion, as are certain parts of the road network.”
- away with railway bottlenecks»Vi vill bygga bort järnvägsnätets flaskhalsar« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to build away the railway network's bottlenecks”
The plan places responsibility for transport system infrastructure on the public and demands that investment levels in railways are kept long-term high, while the traffic itself shall be conducted in competition.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan places responsibility for transport system infrastructure on the public and demands that investment levels in railways are kept long-term high, while the traffic itself shall be conducted in competition. The stewardship principle moreover requires responsible use of common assets, which speaks for own competence and preventive maintenance. The plan's requirement for procurement in competition pulls partly in the opposite direction.
Original (Swedish)
Planen lägger ansvaret för trafiksystemens infrastruktur på det offentliga och kräver att investeringsnivån i järnvägar hålls långsiktigt hög, medan det är själva trafiken som ska bedrivas i konkurrens. Förvaltarskapsprincipen kräver dessutom ett ansvarsfullt brukande av gemensamma tillgångar, vilket talar för egen kompetens och förebyggande underhåll. Planens krav på upphandling i konkurrens drar delvis i motsatt riktning.
- public infrastructure responsibilitydecisive»Det offentliga samhället har ansvar för trafiksystemens utveckling och dess infrastruktur.« (party programme ↗)“Public society has responsibility for transport systems' development and its infrastructure.”
- long-term high investment level»att investeringsnivån i kommunikationssystemens infrastruktur såsom vägar, järnvägar och elektroniska« (party programme ↗)“that investment levels in communication system infrastructure such as roads, railways and electronic”
- stewardship of common assets»Förvaltarskapsprincipen innebär ett ansvar för medmänniskor och miljö« (party programme ↗)“The stewardship principle means a responsibility for fellow humans and the environment”
- procurement in competition»upphandlas i konkurrens.« (party programme ↗)“procured in competition.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan assumes that the public sector should not carry out what can be done equally well or better by others and warns that a large state produces a weaker society.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan assumes that the public sector should not carry out what can be done equally well or better by others and warns that a large state produces a weaker society. The counter-proposal's demand for increased railway maintenance in-house means the opposite direction. The plan's commitment is instead to upgrade the existing railway so that trains can run on time, regardless of delivery method.
Original (Swedish)
Planen utgår från att det offentliga inte ska utföra det som kan göras lika bra eller bättre av andra och varnar för att en stor stat ger ett svagare samhälle. Motförslagets krav på ökat järnvägsunderhåll i egen regi innebär motsatt riktning. Planens åtagande är i stället att rusta upp den befintliga järnvägen så att tågen kan gå i tid, oavsett utförandeform.
- limited public deliverydecisive»Om något kan göras lika bra eller bättre av« (party programme ↗)“If something can be done equally well or better by”
- market economy»Grunden för Sveriges välstånd är en marknadsekonomi baserad« (party programme ↗)“The foundation for Sweden's prosperity is a market economy based”
- upgraded existing railway»Rusta upp dagens järnväg i stället för att satsa på höghastighetståg som riskerar att vara omoderna redan innan de är klara« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Upgrade today's railway instead of betting on high-speed trains that risk being outdated before they are finished”
- smaller state»En stor stat leder till ett svagare samhälle.« (party programme ↗)“A large state leads to a weaker society.”
The plan notes that the railway is neglected and requires that maintenance of roads and railways be improved and that the network be upgraded throughout the country.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan notes that the railway is neglected and requires that maintenance of roads and railways be improved and that the network be upgraded throughout the country. Essential parts of infrastructure should according to the plan be under state control. To review increased in-house delivery of railway maintenance to reclaim expertise thus aligns with the plan's commitments.
Original (Swedish)
Planen konstaterar att järnvägen är eftersatt och kräver att underhållet av vägar och järnväg förbättras och att nätet rustas upp i hela landet. Väsentliga delar av infrastrukturen bör enligt planen stå under statlig kontroll. Att se över ökat eget utförande av järnvägsunderhållet för att återta kompetens ligger därmed i linje med planens åtaganden.
- better railway maintenancedecisive»Förbättra underhållet av vägar och järnväg« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Improve the maintenance of roads and railways”
- neglected railway»Järnvägen är eftersatt och på sina håll får tågen köra mycket långsamt på grund av krokig sträckning och svaga banvallar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The railway is neglected and in some places trains have to run at very low speed because of crooked alignment and weak embankments.”
- state control of infrastructure»försvar och väsentliga delar av vår infrastruktur bör stå under statlig kontroll« (party programme ↗)“defence and essential parts of our infrastructure should be under state control”
- upgraded railway network»Rusta upp väg- och järnvägsnätet i hela landet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Upgrade the road and rail network throughout the country”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2023/24:TU6)
- Committee report full text (HB01TU6)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2023/24:1542 — Etablering och utveckling av övningsanläggningar i Stockholm-Mälardalsregionen av Hans Ekström och Caroline Helmersson Olsson (båda S)
- Motion 2023/24:1577 — Demokratisk kontroll över järnvägen av Mattias Vepsä (S)
- Motion 2023/24:1838 — Ökad säkerhet på tågperrongerna av Carita Boulwén och Johnny Svedin (båda SD)
- Motion 2023/24:1878 — För en framtidssäkrad hållbar svensk järnväg av Daniel Helldén m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2023/24:1891 — En familjevänlig tågtrafik av Julia Kronlid (SD)
- Motion 2023/24:1971 — Persontågstrafik genom hela landet av Linus Sköld m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2023/24:2092 — Utrop på tågstationer av Mattias Eriksson Falk och Roger Hedlund (båda SD)
- Motion 2023/24:230 — Infrastruktur till stöd för jobb och värdeskapande av Mattias Bäckström Johansson (SD)
- Motion 2023/24:2346 — En järnväg för framtiden av Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2023/24:2465 — Hållbara och tillgängliga transporter för hela landet av Ulrika Heie m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2023/24:2516 — Infrastruktur till stöd för jobb och värdeskapande av Laila Naraghi (S)
- Motion 2023/24:2625 — Utgiftsområde 22 Kommunikationer av Gunilla Svantorp m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2023/24:400 — En konkurrenskraftig svensk järnväg av Patrik Jönsson m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2023/24:413 — Sverigevänlig konsumentpolitik av Mikael Eskilandersson m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2023/24:960 — Flyget i en ohållbar tid av Daniel Helldén m.fl. (MP)
Source: The Swedish Parliament