2026-03-042025/26:AU10 · p.15AULabour market
Shortened working hours
An inquiry into a general reduction in working hours
What's at stake: The decision affects whether lawmakers actively push for shorter working hours for everyone, or whether the matter continues to be settled through negotiations between unions and employers. It concerns all employees whose working hours are governed by collective agreements or the Working Hours Act.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the government should launch an inquiry into a general reduction in working hours, or whether the matter should remain one for labor-market parties to resolve through collective agreements.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee notes that the Working Hours Act is largely non-mandatory and that questions of working time, including any reduction, are primarily for labor-market parties to resolve through collective agreements. The committee sees no reason for the state to intervene in the matter. The motions are rejected.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 18 (V, MP)
The reservation (V, MP) wants the government to launch an inquiry into a general reduction in working hours, arguing that shorter hours would create a more sustainable labor market in which people can work until retirement age, and better conditions for couples to share work and life equally.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 18 by V, MP.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have held
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: SSocialdemokraterna
Ja 267–36Ja 174–129
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | No 0/19/0/3 | match | confidence: high | explicit |
| S | No | Yes 93/0/0/13 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: medium | explicit |
| MP | No | No 0/15/0/3 | match | confidence: high | explicit |
| C | Yes | Yes 21/0/0/3 | match | confidence: medium | derived |
| L | Yes | Yes 14/0/0/2 | match | confidence: medium | derived |
| KD | Yes | Yes 16/0/0/3 | match | confidence: medium | derived |
| M | Yes | Yes 60/0/0/8 | match | confidence: high | not addressed |
| SD | Yes | Yes 61/0/0/10 | match | confidence: medium | derived |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2025/26:300 by Fredrik Lindahl (SD), 2025/26:932 by Jamal El-Haj (-) motions 1 and 2, 2025/26:1532 by Emma Ahlström Köster (M) motion 1, and 2025/26:2371 by Ciczie Weidby et al. (V) motion 25.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2025/26:300 av Fredrik Lindahl (SD), 2025/26:932 av Jamal El-Haj (-) yrkandena 1 och 2, 2025/26:1532 av Emma Ahlström Köster (M) yrkande 1 och 2025/26:2371 av Ciczie Weidby m.fl. (V) yrkande 25.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag rejected approximately 70 proposals in motions from the general motion session of 2025 concerning labour law and working hours. The Riksdag refers, among other things, to the fact that current regulations do not require the changes proposed, and to the responsibility of the parties for regulating conditions on the labour market. The proposals concern, among other things, employment protection, posting of workers, and work via digital platforms.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to strengthen employment security for employees with temporary contracts through stricter rules and reduced risk of abuse. (V, MP) — Reservation 18
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan explicitly demands a general reduction in working hours and wants to begin a gradual reduction with maintained wages.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan explicitly demands a general reduction in working hours and wants to begin a gradual reduction with maintained wages. An investigation into general working-hour reduction is a direct step towards that commitment. The plan's own motives—sustainable working life and more equal distribution of unpaid domestic work—are moreover the same as the counter-proposal's.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver uttryckligen en generell arbetstidsförkortning och vill påbörja en stegvis förkortning med bibehållen lön. En utredning om generell arbetstidsförkortning är ett direkt steg mot det åtagandet. Planens egna motiv - hållbart arbetsliv och jämnare fördelning av det obetalda hemarbetet - är dessutom desamma som motförslagets.
- general reduction in working hoursdecisive»Vi vill se en generell arbetstidsförkortning.« (party programme ↗)“We want to see a general reduction in working hours.”
- gradual reduction with maintained wages»Vi vill påbörja en stegvis arbetstidsförkortning« (party programme ↗)“We want to begin a gradual reduction in working hours”
- six-hour working day»Med dagens tekniska utveckling finns förutsättningar att inleda en arbetstidsförkortning, med sikte på sex timmars arbetsdag, med bibehållen lön.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“With today's technological development there are conditions to begin a reduction in working hours, aiming at a six-hour working day, with maintained wages.”
- working hours as a gender equality issue»En arbetstidsförkortning skulle vara ett viktigt steg för ökad jämställdhet eftersom det också skulle möjliggöra för en mer jämställd fördelning av det obetalda hemarbetet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“A reduction in working hours would be an important step for increased gender equality since it would also enable a more equal distribution of unpaid domestic work.”
The programme states that society's productivity increases should be converted into both increased living standards and shorter working hours, and counts reduced working hours as part of the better working conditions that technological development should provide.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The programme states that society's productivity increases should be converted into both increased living standards and shorter working hours, and counts reduced working hours as part of the better working conditions that technological development should provide. The goal that more people should be able to work throughout their working life is also the reason the counter-proposal cites. An investigation into general reduction in working hours is thus in line with the plan, even though the plan sees collective agreements as the norm.
Original (Swedish)
Programmet slår fast att samhällets produktivitetsökningar ska omsättas i både ökad levnadsstandard och kortare arbetstid, och räknar minskad arbetstid till de bättre arbetsvillkor den tekniska utvecklingen ska ge. Målet att fler ska orka jobba hela arbetslivet är också det skäl motförslaget anför. En utredning om generell arbetstidsförkortning ligger därmed i linje med planen, även om planen ser kollektivavtalen som norm.
- productivity gains to shorter working hoursdecisive»Samhällets produktivitetsökningar omsätts i både ökad levnadsstandard och kortare« (party programme ↗)“Society's productivity increases are converted into both increased living standards and shorter”
- reduced working hours»bättre arbetsvillkor inklusive minskad arbetstid.« (party programme ↗)“better working conditions including reduced working hours.”
- sustainable working life»Fler som orkar jobba hela arbetslivet.« (party programme ↗)“More people who can manage working throughout their working life.”
- collective agreements as norm»Kollektivavtal som norm, försvar av den svenska modellen.« (party programme ↗)“Collective agreements as norm, defense of the Swedish model.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan aims to legislate on reduced normal working hours with a 35-hour week as a first step and the vision of a four-day week, and the election manifesto promises to shorten working hours so more people can work a full working life.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan aims to legislate on reduced normal working hours with a 35-hour week as a first step and the vision of a four-day week, and the election manifesto promises to shorten working hours so more people can work a full working life. This is exactly the counter-proposal's rationale for a more sustainable labor market. An investigation into general working-hours reduction is a minimum requirement in relation to the plan's own ambition.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill lagstifta om sänkt normalarbetstid med 35-timmarsveckan som ett första steg och visionen om fyradagarsvecka, och valmanifestet lovar att korta arbetstiden så att fler orkar jobba ett helt arbetsliv. Det är exakt motförslagets motiv om en mer hållbar arbetsmarknad. En utredning om generell arbetstidsförkortning är ett minimikrav i förhållande till planens egna ambition.
- legislated shorter working hoursdecisive»Därför vill vi i Miljöpartiet lagstifta om sänkt normalarbetstid, där en 35-timmarsvecka är ett första steg, med visionen om en fyradagarsvecka.« (party programme ↗)“Therefore, in the Green Party we want to legislate on reduced normal working hours, where a 35-hour week is a first step, with the vision of a four-day week.”
- shorter working hours for sustainability»korta arbetstiden så att fler människor orkar jobba ett helt arbetsliv.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“shorten working hours so that more people can work a full working life.”
- working hours as a freedom reform»Kortare arbetstid är en frihetsreform som ger människor makten över sin tid.« (party programme ↗)“Shorter working hours is a freedom reform that gives people power over their time.”
- unsustainable working life»Stressrelaterad ohälsa har blivit den vanligaste grunden för sjukskrivning.« (party programme ↗)“Stress-related illness has become the most common reason for sick leave.”
The plan wants the labor market's rules to be determined by the parties rather than through legislation to the greatest possible extent, and values the work ethic and more work hours as the foundation for welfare financing.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants the labor market's rules to be determined by the parties rather than through legislation to the greatest possible extent, and values the work ethic and more work hours as the foundation for welfare financing. A government investigation into general working time reduction is the opposite of both these commitments. The plan does not directly address working hours length, which is why the position is derived.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill att arbetsmarknadens spelregler i mesta möjliga mån fastställs av parterna i stället för genom lagstiftning, och den värnar arbetslinjen och fler arbetade timmar som grunden för välfärdens finansiering. En statlig utredning om generell arbetstidsförkortning är motsatsen till båda dessa åtaganden. Planen behandlar inte arbetstidens längd direkt, varför ställningstagandet härleds.
- parties before legislationdecisive»arbetsmarknadens parter i stället för genom lagstiftning.« (party programme ↗)“the labor market's parties rather than through legislation.”
- valued work ethic»Arbetslinjen måste värnas, och den som kan jobba ska inte leva på skattebetalarnas pengar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The work ethic must be valued, and those who can work should not live on taxpayers' money.”
- jobs build welfare»Jobben är grunden för hela samhällets utveckling« (party programme ↗)“Jobs are the foundation for all society's development”
- more in work»Det måste bli lättare att få ett jobb och bli billigare att anställa.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It must become easier to get a job and cheaper to hire.”
The plan asserts the work principle and the striving towards full employment, and wants more to be able to work longer in life rather than shorter.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan asserts the work principle and the striving towards full employment, and wants more to be able to work longer in life rather than shorter. It also establishes that conditions on the labor market shall mainly be determined by agreement and not by law, which speaks against a state investigation into general working time reduction. The plan's answer to the need for sustainability is instead individual influence over one's own working time.
Original (Swedish)
Planen hävdar arbetslinjen och strävan mot full sysselsättning, och vill att fler ska kunna arbeta längre i livet snarare än kortare. Den slår också fast att villkoren på arbetsmarknaden i huvudsak ska bestämmas genom avtal och inte i lag, vilket talar mot en statlig utredning om generell arbetstidsförkortning. Planens svar på behovet av hållbarhet är i stället individuellt inflytande över den egna arbetstiden.
- the work principle is asserteddecisive»Vi människor lever inte för att arbeta, men för att stärka den enskildes möjlighet till ett självständigt liv och för den gemensamma välfärdens skull är det viktigt att hävda arbetslinjen och sträva mot full sysselsättning.« (party programme ↗)“We people do not live to work, but to strengthen the individual's opportunity for an independent life and for the sake of common welfare it is important to assert the work principle and strive towards full employment.”
- conditions through agreements»Den svenska arbetsmarknadsmodellen, där villkoren i huvudsak bestäms genom avtal och inte i lag, bidrar till ansvarstagande på arbetsmarknaden.« (party programme ↗)“The Swedish labor market model, where conditions are mainly determined by agreement and not by law, contributes to responsibility on the labor market.”
- individual influence over working time»Fler anställda bör ha inflytande över sin egen arbetstid, till exempel genom en timbank eller en arbetstid som varierar över året.« (party programme ↗)“More employees should have influence over their own working time, for example through an hour bank or working time that varies over the year.”
- longer working life»Att äldre ges större möjlighet att fortsätta arbeta ökar den enskildes valfrihet och förbättrar samhällsekonomin.« (party programme ↗)“That older people are given greater opportunity to continue working increases individual freedom of choice and improves the economy.”
The plan states that the design of working time is a matter for the labour market parties, rejects state direction in the form of income policy and warns politicians against unnecessarily interfering.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan states that the design of working time is a matter for the labour market parties, rejects state direction in the form of income policy and warns politicians against unnecessarily interfering. The election manifesto moreover wants to make it possible to work longer and more flexibly, not to generally shorten working time. A state inquiry into general working time reduction thus goes against the plan's line.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att arbetstidens utformning är arbetsmarknadens parters sak, avvisar statlig styrning i form av inkomstpolitik och varnar politiker för att i onödan lägga sig i. Valmanifestet vill dessutom göra det möjligt att arbeta längre och mer flexibelt, inte att generellt korta arbetstiden. En statlig utredning om generell arbetstidsförkortning går därför emot planens linje.
- the parties design working timedecisive»Utformningen ska göras av arbetsmarknadens parter. En klar rollfördelning ska« (party programme ↗)“Design shall be done by the labour market parties. A clear division of roles shall”
- no to state control»inkomstpolitik avvisas.« (party programme ↗)“income policy is rejected.”
- work longer and more flexibly»Gör det möjligt att arbeta längre och mer flexibelt för den som kan genom att förlänga rätten att arbeta (LAS-åldern) i två steg till 75 års ålder, med ömsesidig rätt att minska arbetstiden till 50%.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Make it possible to work longer and more flexibly for those who can by extending the right to work (LAS age) in two steps to age 75, with mutual right to reduce working time to 50%.”
- politics should not interfere»Politiker måste motstå frestelsen att i onödan lägga sig i.« (party programme ↗)“Politicians must resist the temptation to unnecessarily interfere.”
The counter-proposal wants to investigate a general reduction of working hours.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The counter-proposal wants to investigate a general reduction of working hours. The plan's core commitment is the opposite: the work line should be re-established, more should work and work more, and taxes and benefit systems should be based on the work line. The plan even wants to reduce involuntary part-time work, which is incompatible with politically shortening general working hours.
Original (Swedish)
Motförslaget vill utreda en generell arbetstidsförkortning. Planens bärande åtagande är motsatt: arbetslinjen ska återupprättas, fler ska arbeta och arbeta mer, och skatter och bidragssystem ska utgå från arbetslinjen. Planen vill till och med minska det ofrivilliga deltidsarbetet, vilket är oförenligt med att politiskt korta den generella arbetstiden.
- re-established work linedecisive»Att återupprätta arbetslinjen är det bästa sättet att se till att Sveriges hushåll har styrka nog att komma igenom den tuffa tid som ligger framför oss.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Re-establishing the work line is the best way to ensure that Swedish households have the strength to get through the tough time ahead of us.”
- work line as foundation»Skatter och bidragssystem ska utgå från arbetslinjen.« (party programme ↗)“Taxes and benefit systems should be based on the work line.”
- more working hours»Minska det ofrivilliga deltidsarbetet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Reduce involuntary part-time work”
- work should pay»Sänka skatten på arbete så att din ansträngning lönar sig bättre« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Lower the tax on work so that your effort pays off better”
The plan establishes that everyone with the ability should work in real jobs and that it should become more profitable to work, with business conditions as the foundation of welfare.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that everyone with the ability should work in real jobs and that it should become more profitable to work, with business conditions as the foundation of welfare. A general reduction in working time pulls the opposite direction and would also move a question that the plan says belongs with the labour market parties to state regulation. The plan provides no support for investigating shorter working hours.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att alla som har förmågan ska arbeta i riktiga jobb och att det ska bli mer lönsamt att arbeta, med företagens villkor som grund för välfärden. En generell arbetstidsförkortning drar åt motsatt håll och skulle dessutom flytta en fråga som planen menar hör hemma hos arbetsmarknadens parter till statlig reglering. Planen ger inget stöd för att utreda kortare arbetstid.
- work as foundationdecisive»Alla som har förmågan ska arbeta i riktiga jobb, försörja sig och bidra till att bygga Sverige bättre.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Everyone with the ability shall work in real jobs, support themselves, and contribute to building Sweden better.”
- it should pay to work»Göra det mer lönsamt att arbeta« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Make it more profitable to work”
- the parties determine working conditions»Sverigedemokraterna försvarar grunderna i den svenska modellen« (party programme ↗)“Sweden Democrats defend the foundations of the Swedish model”
- business conditions bear welfare»Grunden för välfärden skapas i företagen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The foundation for welfare is created in companies.”
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2025/26:AU10)
- Committee report full text (HD01AU10)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2025/26:1044 — Tydliga arbetsrättsliga regler för plattformsekonomin av Jamal El-Haj (-)
- Motion 2025/26:12 — Avsked inom offentlig sektor av Josef Fransson (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:1351 — Heltidsarbete som norm inom offentlig sektor av Roger Hedlund och Mattias Eriksson Falk (båda SD)
- Motion 2025/26:1502 — Förbättrad arbetsmiljö av Jamal El-Haj (-)
- Motion 2025/26:1504 — Stärkt skydd för arbetstagares integritet av Jamal El-Haj (-)
- Motion 2025/26:1532 — Förlängda arbetsincitament genom en moderniserad 80-90-modell av Emma Ahlström Köster (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1747 — Visselblåsarfunktion för statligt anställda av Jan Ericson (M)
- Motion 2025/26:187 — Ett modernt skydd för den personliga integriteten i arbetslivet av Leila Ali Elmi m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2025/26:1942 — Stärkta villkor och arbetsmiljö inom gigekonomin av Mattias Jonsson (S)
- Motion 2025/26:2114 — Möjliggörande av dygnspass inom svensk blåljusverksamhet av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2371 — Arbetsmiljö och arbetstid av Ciczie Weidby m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2025/26:2372 — En arbetsrätt för starka och trygga löntagare av Ciczie Weidby m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2025/26:2392 — Medborgarskapskrav vid anställning hos Migrationsverket av Markus Wiechel (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:2445 — Avtalsrätt för yrkesnära fackorganisationer av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2449 — Möjliggörande av dygnspass av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2462 — Politisk strejk av John E Weinerhall (M)
- Motion 2025/26:300 — Förbättringar och andra åtgärder kring arbetsmiljö och arbetsmarknad för nattarbete av Fredrik Lindahl (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:307 — Ordning och reda på arbetsmarknaden av Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2025/26:3187 — Socialförsäkringar av Martina Johansson m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2025/26:3191 — Arbetsmarknad av Jonny Cato m.fl. (C)
Source: The Swedish Parliament