2025-05-212024/25:FiU37 · p.2FiUEconomy & finance
Continued opportunities for credit intermediation
Continued scope for credit intermediaries to operate as consumer credit institutions
What's at stake: If requirements differ between credit provision and credit intermediation, firms risk circumventing the tightened rules by restructuring as intermediaries, undermining consumer protection against aggressive marketing and debt. It affects consumers with loans as well as firms that broker or grant credit.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether credit intermediaries should continue to be allowed to operate as consumer credit institutions, or whether they — like credit providers — should be required to hold a banking or financing licence.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee considers that differing requirements for credit provision and credit intermediation create an incentive to shift activity into intermediation to avoid the new requirements, risking continued aggressive marketing toward already indebted groups. Much of the proposal's consumer protection would be lost unless the same level applies to intermediaries, so the committee rejects the motion.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 2 (C)
The reservation holds that credit intermediaries should be able to continue their business without being forced to run a banking or financing operation, and wants the government to come back with a proposal that accommodates this.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 2 by C.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
What each plan points to — and how the party voted
For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| Plan | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | Yes | Yes 21/0/0/3 | follows the plan | confidence: high | derived |
| S | Yes | Yes 93/0/0/13 | follows the plan | confidence: low | derived |
| MP | Yes | Yes 15/0/0/3 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| C | No | No 0/21/0/3 | follows the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| L | Yes | Yes 14/0/0/2 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| KD | Yes | Yes 16/0/0/3 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| M | No | Yes 60/0/0/8 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| SD | Yes | Yes 63/0/0/9 | follows the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects motion 2024/25:3373 by Martin Ådahl et al. (C) item 2.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motion 2024/25:3373 av Martin Ådahl m.fl. (C) yrkande 2.
Riksdag decision: Consumer protection on the credit market shall be strengthened. The Riksdag approved the government's proposal aimed at preventing over-indebtedness among Swedish households. The market for consumer credit has grown rapidly in recent years. Quick loans provided by consumer credit institutions, so-called quick loan companies, have according to the government and Riksdag contributed to over-indebtedness. It is above all young people with low incomes who have taken the quick loans. According to the decision, it shall no longer be possible to conduct business as a consumer credit institution. Instead, only banks shall be allowed to provide consumer credit. The new rules come into force on 1 July 2025.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to reject the government's proposal and instead strengthen regulation of the credit market. (C) — Reservation 2
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan establishes that indebtedness weakens people's independence and that regulation of loan terms shall be based on our common needs rather than financial capital's, and requires harder regulation of banks' societal-impact activities.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that indebtedness weakens people's independence and that regulation of loan terms shall be based on our common needs rather than financial capital's, and requires harder regulation of banks' societal-impact activities. An exception that lets credit brokers continue without the same requirements as credit providers opens precisely the gap the plan wants to close and risks continued aggressive marketing toward the economically vulnerable.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att skuldsättning försvagar människors självständighet och att regleringen av lånevillkor ska utgå från våra gemensamma behov snarare än finanskapitalets, och kräver hårdare reglering av bankernas samhällspåverkande verksamhet. Ett undantag som låter kreditförmedlare fortsätta utan samma krav som kreditgivare öppnar just den lucka planen vill stänga och riskerar fortsatt aggressiv marknadsföring mot ekonomiskt svaga.
- indebtedness weakens independencedecisive»Skuldsättning försvagar många människors självständighet och« (party programme ↗)“Indebtedness weakens many people's independence and”
- regulation of loan terms»Regleringen av lånevillkor behöver utgå från« (party programme ↗)“Regulation of loan terms needs to be based on”
- needs before financial capital»våra gemensamma behov snarare än finanskapitalets.« (party programme ↗)“our common needs rather than financial capital's.”
- harder banking regulation»Tills dess behövs en hårdare reglering av bankernas« (party programme ↗)“Until then, harder regulation of banks'”
The plan does not address credit brokerage.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan does not address credit brokerage. The closest principle is the party programme's requirement for democratic counterweights and stable market rules, and that democracy has the supreme right to set the framework for the economy. Allowing brokers to continue without the same requirements as credit providers opens just the loophole that undermines consumer protection. The plan therefore speaks against the counter-proposal's requirement.
Original (Swedish)
Planen behandlar inte kreditförmedling. Närmast liggande princip är partiprogrammets krav på demokratiska motvikter och stabila spelregler för marknaden, och att demokratin har den överordnade rätten att ange ramar för ekonomin. Att låta förmedlare fortsätta utan samma krav som kreditgivare öppnar just den kryphålsväg som urholkar konsumentskyddet. Planen talar därför emot motförslagets krav.
- democratic counterweights against the marketdecisive»Det krävs demokratiska motvikter för att skapa de stabila spelregler som behövs för att« (party programme ↗)“Democratic counterweights are required to create the stable rules that are needed to”
- democracy sets the framework»den överordnade rätten att ange villkor och ramar för ekonomin.« (party programme ↗)“the supreme right to set conditions and framework for the economy.”
- respect for household finances»Den ekonomiska politiken behöver bedrivas med stor varsamhet och respekt för vanliga hushålls ekonomi.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Economic policy needs to be conducted with great care and respect for ordinary households' finances.”
The counter-proposal wants to let credit brokers continue without the tightened requirements.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The counter-proposal wants to let credit brokers continue without the tightened requirements. The party programme states that greed and over-indebtedness shall be counteracted, that too high private debt is a risk for the individual and the economy and that consumer protection shall be strong. The plan therefore speaks against an exemption that hollows out protection.
Original (Swedish)
Motförslaget vill låta kreditförmedlare fortsätta utan de skärpta kraven. Partiprogrammet slår fast att girighet och överskuldsättning ska motverkas, att en alltför hög privat skuldsättning är en risk för individen och samhällsekonomin och att konsumentskyddet ska vara starkt. Planen talar därför emot ett undantag som urholkar skyddet.
- counteract over-indebtednessdecisive»Girighet, överskuldsättning och spekulation ska motverkas.« (party programme ↗)“Greed, over-indebtedness and speculation shall be counteracted.”
- risk with high indebtedness»En alltför hög privat skuldsättning är en risk för individen och för samhällsekonomin.« (party programme ↗)“Too high private debt is a risk for the individual and the economy.”
- strong consumer protection»Vi vill ha ett starkt skydd för konsumenterna genom god konsumentvägledning, tydlig märkning av varor och tjänster och en relevant konsumentutbildning i skolan.« (party programme ↗)“We want strong consumer protection through good consumer guidance, clear labelling of goods and services and relevant consumer education in school.”
- sound market conditions»Staten ska genom lagstiftning och övervakning se till att sunda villkor råder på marknaden.« (party programme ↗)“The state shall through legislation and supervision ensure that sound conditions prevail on the market.”
The plan says nothing about credit intermediation, but it consistently requires that regulatory red tape be cleaned up for businesses large and small and that the market economy be free from command-economy directives with given and predictable rules.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan says nothing about credit intermediation, but it consistently requires that regulatory red tape be cleaned up for businesses large and small and that the market economy be free from command-economy directives with given and predictable rules. Forcing intermediaries to run banking or financing operations is a threshold that eliminates smaller players and reduces competition. The conclusion is therefore derived from general business policy principles.
Original (Swedish)
Planen säger inget om kreditförmedling, men den kräver genomgående att regelträsket rensas upp för företag stora som små och att marknadsekonomin är fri från planekonomiska pekpinnar med givna och förutsägbara spelregler. Att tvinga förmedlare att driva bank- eller finansieringsrörelse är en tröskel som slår ut mindre aktörer och minskar konkurrensen. Slutsatsen är därför härledd ur allmänna näringspolitiska principer.
- regulatory simplification for businessdecisive»Rensa upp i regelträsket för entreprenörer, stora som små. Vi vill införa en ny och förenklad företagsform för mikroföretag, så att fler ska våga testa att driva företag.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Clean up the regulatory red tape for entrepreneurs, large and small. We want to introduce a new and simplified business form for microenterprises, so that more people dare to try running a business.”
- predictable rules»Ekonomin ska ha givna och förutsägbara spelregler« (party programme ↗)“The economy should have given and predictable rules”
- freer markets and competition»Genom att skapa friare marknader och förbättra konkurrensen kan vi dämpa priserna ytterligare.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“By creating freer markets and improving competition, we can further dampen prices.”
flags: citat_blockerat
The plan establishes that private power can also be abused and that market economy requires rules, and that the individual's position shall be strengthened through improved consumer and contract legislation.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that private power can also be abused and that market economy requires rules, and that the individual's position shall be strengthened through improved consumer and contract legislation. An exception that allows credit intermediaries to escape lender requirements opens the door to aggressive marketing against those already in debt. The plan thus speaks against the counter-proposal's requirement, although the regulatory burden should generally decrease.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att även privat makt kan missbrukas och att marknadsekonomin kräver spelregler, samt att den enskildes ställning ska stärkas genom förbättrad konsument- och avtalslagstiftning. Ett undantag som låter kreditförmedlare slippa kreditgivarnas krav öppnar för aggressiv marknadsföring mot redan skuldsatta. Planen talar därför emot motförslagets krav, även om regelbördan generellt bör minska.
- stronger consumer protectiondecisive»vardagen behöver stärkas genom förbättrad konsument- och avtalslagstiftning.« (party programme ↗)“everyday life needs to be strengthened through improved consumer and contract legislation.”
- rules against abuse»Även den privata makten kan missbrukas. Marknadsekonomin kräver spelregler för att« (party programme ↗)“Private power can also be abused. Market economy requires rules for”
- help for the over-indebted»Reglerna för skuldsanering ska ändras så att överskuldsatta får större möjlighet att bli skuldfria.« (party programme ↗)“The rules for debt relief shall be changed so that the over-indebted get greater opportunity to become debt-free.”
- lower regulatory burden»Regelbördan för små företag ska minska, genom ansträngningar på både kommunal, statlig och« (party programme ↗)“The regulatory burden for small businesses shall decrease, through efforts at municipal, state, and”
The plan requires active and well-informed consumers and effective legal rules, and makes it a state role to oversee that legislation and good ethics are upheld in the market.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires active and well-informed consumers and effective legal rules, and makes it a state role to oversee that legislation and good ethics are upheld in the market. To let credit brokers continue without corresponding requirements opens exactly the path around consumer protection that the plan wants to close. The requirement that laws be tested from a small-business perspective weighs against but does not carry the counter-proposal.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver aktiva och välinformerade konsumenter samt effektiva rättsliga spelregler, och gör det till statens roll att övervaka att lagstiftning och god etik upprätthålls på marknaden. Att låta kreditförmedlare fortsätta utan motsvarande krav öppnar just den väg runt konsumentskyddet som planen vill stänga. Kravet på att lagar prövas ur ett småföretagarperspektiv väger emot men bär inte motförslaget.
- strong consumer protectiondecisive»En fungerande marknadsekonomi kräver aktiva och välinformerade konsumenter samt effektiva rättsliga spelregler. En väl utbyggd konsumentinformation är nödvändig.« (party programme ↗)“A functioning market economy requires active and well-informed consumers and effective legal rules. Well-developed consumer information is necessary.”
- state market oversight»Statens roll i näringspolitiken är att övervaka att lagstiftningen och en god etik upprätthålls på marknaden.« (party programme ↗)“The state's role in business policy is to oversee that legislation and good ethics are upheld in the market.”
- ethics as foundation of market»En väl fungerande marknadsekonomi förutsätter en effektiv konkurrens, stabila institutioner och etiskt handlande. I annat fall hotas tilltron till marknadsekonomin.« (party programme ↗)“A well-functioning market economy presupposes effective competition, stable institutions and ethical conduct. Otherwise trust in the market economy is threatened.”
- small-business perspective»Tillkommande lagar bör prövas ur ett småföretagarperspektiv.« (party programme ↗)“New laws should be tested from a small-business perspective.”
The plan does not address credit intermediation or consumer credit.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan does not address credit intermediation or consumer credit. The closest principle is that conditions for starting, growing and expanding should be good and that one third of red tape and companies' administration costs should be removed, together with the party programme's strong protection of business freedom. Allowing credit intermediaries to continue without requirements for banking or financing operations lies closest to these principles, but the conclusion is derived.
Original (Swedish)
Planen behandlar inte kreditförmedling eller konsumentkrediter. Närmast liggande princip är att villkoren för att starta, växa och expandera ska vara goda och att en tredjedel av regelkrånglet och företagens administrationskostnader ska bort, tillsammans med partiprogrammets starka skydd för näringsfriheten. Att låta kreditförmedlare fortsätta utan krav på bank- eller finansieringsrörelse ligger närmast dessa principer, men slutsatsen är härledd.
- good conditions for businessdecisive»Villkoren för att starta, växa och expandera behöver vara goda för att fler ska våga lämna trygga och välbetalda jobb för att starta företag.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Conditions for starting, growing and expanding need to be good so that more dare to leave secure and well-paid jobs to start companies.”
- reduced red tape»Ta bort en tredjedel av företagens administrationskostnader och en tredjedel av regelkrånglet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Remove one third of companies' administration costs and one third of red tape”
- strong business freedom»Äganderätten och näringsfriheten ska ha ett starkt skydd« (party programme ↗)“Property rights and business freedom shall have strong protection”
- market economy's responsibility»Marknadsekonomin främjar hushållning, ansvar, kreativitet och långsiktighet.« (party programme ↗)“The market economy promotes husbandry, responsibility, creativity and long-termism.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan does not address consumer credit or credit intermediation.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan does not address consumer credit or credit intermediation. The nearest principle is that unnecessary regulations should be removed where the costs to companies do not justify the benefit to society, which presupposes that social benefit is weighed in, and that the market economy should be responsibly regulated. That credit intermediaries be exempted from the toughened requirements therefore lacks support in the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Planen behandlar inte konsumentkrediter eller kreditförmedling. Den närmast liggande principen är att onödiga regler ska tas bort där kostnaderna för företagen inte motsvarar nyttan för samhället, vilket förutsätter att samhällsnyttan vägs in, samt att marknadsekonomin ska vara ansvarsfullt reglerad. Att undanta kreditförmedlare från de skärpta kraven har därför inte stöd i planen.
- rules weighed against social benefitdecisive»För att få fler och växande företag är det viktigt att ta bort onödiga regler där kostnaderna för företagen inte motsvarar nyttan för samhället.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“To get more and growing companies it is important to remove unnecessary rules where the costs to companies do not justify the benefit to society.”
- responsibly regulated market»reglerad marknadsekonomi, byggd på långsiktigt tänkande, är för oss självklar.« (party programme ↗)“responsible market economy, built on long-term thinking, is self-evident to us.”
- cost-effective rules»Nya regler ska vara kostnadseffektiva och befintliga regler behöver ses över.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“New rules shall be cost-effective and existing rules need to be reviewed.”
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2024/25:FiU37)
- Committee report full text (HC01FiU37)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2024/25:3373 — med anledning av prop. 2024/25:138 Stärkt konsumentskydd på kreditmarknaden av Martin Ådahl m.fl. (C)
- Proposition 2024/25:138 — Stärkt konsumentskydd på kreditmarknaden
Source: The Swedish Parliament