2026-06-152025/26:SfU32 · p.3SfUMigration & social insurance

Other Parts of the Bill

The remaining parts of the bill on strengthened return enforcement

What's at stake: The package includes, among other things, a lower threshold for internal immigration checks and expanded powers to establish a person's identity, including confiscating phones and other devices. It therefore affects both the authorities' ability to carry out removals and deportations and the risk that people of foreign background - including those who have the right to remain in Sweden - face more checks.

Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.

What the vote decides

The question is whether the Riksdag should adopt the remaining parts of the bill - including changes to the Code of Judicial Procedure, the Citizenship Act, the Aliens Act and the Aliens Data Act - as the government has designed them, or instead reject the proposition in this part with the exception of the rules on removal obstacles and the right to counsel.

Yes Yes — the committee proposal

The committee stresses that effective, well-functioning return enforcement is a precondition for a sustainable long-term migration policy. Concerns that the disclosure duty and the expanded controls could reduce trust in public institutions and make foreign nationals avoid contact with authorities are not seen as needing to be exaggerated, since better cooperation between authorities and more effective return enforcement could instead increase trust in the state. The committee therefore proposes that the Riksdag adopt the remaining parts of the bill.

No No — the reservations

Reservation 3 (V, MP)

The reservation (V, MP) argues that the proposals fail to solve the problems of a 'shadow society' and that fear of contact with authorities risks increasing even in situations where people need help, protection or basic support, making them more vulnerable and weakening society's ability to detect exploitation. The reservers warn that a lower threshold for internal immigration checks and the new disclosure duty open the door to risks of racial and ethnic profiling, and that expanded powers to establish identity - including confiscating phones and other devices for up to three months - amount to a disproportionate intrusion into private life. They therefore want to reject the proposition in this part, with the exception of the rules on removal obstacles and the right to counsel.

Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.

VSMPCLKDMSD
YesNoAbstainAbsent

What do the votes mean here?

Yes The committee proposal: adopting the government's legislative proposal and rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).

No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 3 by V, MP.

Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.

What each plan points to — and how the party voted

For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.

PlanVoteConfidenceEvidence
Vown reservationNoNo 0/21/0/0follows the planconfidence: highderived
SYesYes 105/0/0/1follows the planconfidence: mediumderived
MPown reservationNoNo 0/18/0/0follows the planconfidence: highderived
CNoYes 24/0/0/0departs from the planconfidence: mediumderived
LYesYes 16/0/0/0follows the planconfidence: mediumderived
KDYesYes 19/0/0/0follows the planconfidence: mediumderived
MYesYes 66/0/0/0follows the planconfidence: highderived
SDYesYes 70/0/0/0follows the planconfidence: highexplicit

Committee proposal

The Riksdag adopts the government's proposal for 1. Act amending the Code of Judicial Procedure, 2. Act amending the Act (2001:82) on Swedish Citizenship, 3. Act amending the Aliens Act (2005:716) in the parts not covered by the Committee's proposal above, 4. Act amending the Aliens Data Act (2016:27), 5. Act amending the Act (2018:1693) on Police Handling of Personal Data within the Crime Data Act's Scope, 6. Act amending the Act (2022:700) on Special Control of Certain Aliens, 7. Act amending the Act (2026:000) amending the Act (2025:945) amending the Aliens Data Act (2016:27). Thereby, the Riksdag approves Proposition 2025/26:263 points 1, 2, 3 in this respect and 4-7, and rejects the motions 2025/26:4150 by Tony Haddou et al. (V) demand 1 in this respect and 2025/26:4173 by Annika Hirvonen et al. (MP) demands 1 and 6, both in this respect.

Original (Swedish)

Riksdagen antar regeringens förslag till 1. lag om ändring i rättegångsbalken, 2. lag om ändring i lagen (2001:82) om svenskt medborgarskap, 3. lag om ändring i utlänningslagen (2005:716) i de delar som inte omfattas av utskottets förslag ovan, 4. lag om ändring i utlänningsdatalagen (2016:27), 5. lag om ändring i lagen (2018:1693) om polisens behandling av personuppgifter inom brottsdatalagens område, 6. lag om ändring i lagen (2022:700) om särskild kontroll av vissa utlänningar, 7. lag om ändring i lagen (2026:000) om ändring i lagen (2025:945) om ändring i utlänningsdatalagen (2016:27). Därmed bifaller riksdagen proposition 2025/26:263 punkterna 1, 2, 3 i denna del och 4-7 samt avslår motionerna 2025/26:4150 av Tony Haddou m.fl. (V) yrkande 1 i denna del och 2025/26:4173 av Annika Hirvonen m.fl. (MP) yrkandena 1 och 6, båda i denna del.

Riksdag decision: The government wants to make return work more efficient and implement several changes to, among other things, the Aliens Act. The Riksdag voted yes to the government's proposal. To make return work more efficient, the government proposes that the Police Authority and the Migration Board shall receive better tools to enforce deportation and expulsion decisions. The government proposes a new obligation for the Employment Service, the Social Insurance Agency, the Prison and Probation Service, the Enforcement Authority, the Pensions Authority and the Tax Authority to on their own initiative provide information about an alien to the Police Authority, if there is reason to believe that he or she does not have the right to reside in Sweden. The proposal also means that the authorities are given additional tools to clarify an alien's identity. A possibility is introduced to take custody of and search an alien's mobile telephone, if it can be assumed to contain information about the alien's identity. Furthermore, fingerprints and photographs shall be allowed to be used in alien matters to a greater extent and more efficiently than today. The law amendments start to apply on 13 July 2026.

Counter-proposals

Plan vs actual vote

Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.

VVänsterpartietNoNofollows the planderived

The plan establishes that all people have the right to protection of their personal integrity and that authorities have a special responsibility to meet everyone with the same respect, and it explicitly warns of racism in authority practice.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan establishes that all people have the right to protection of their personal integrity and that authorities have a special responsibility to meet everyone with the same respect, and it explicitly warns of racism in authority practice. A lowered threshold for internal checks, a new reporting obligation and seizure of mobile phones for up to three months stand in conflict with that. The counter-proposal's demand to not implement the bill in this part is therefore supported by the plan.

Original (Swedish)

Planen slår fast att alla människor har rätt till skydd av sin personliga integritet och att myndigheter har ett särskilt ansvar att möta alla med samma respekt, och den varnar uttryckligen för rasism i myndighetsutövningen. En sänkt tröskel för inre kontroller, en ny uppgiftsskyldighet och omhändertagande av mobiltelefoner i upp till tre månader står i konflikt med det. Motförslagets krav att inte genomföra lagförslaget i denna del stöds därför av planen.

  • protection of personal integritydecisive»har rätt till skydd av sin personliga integritet.« (party programme ↗)“have the right to protection of their personal integrity.”
  • against racism in authority practice»Många unga, särskilt med utländsk bakgrund, som bor i fattiga områden, utsätts även för rasism och övervåld från polisen« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Many young people, especially with foreign background, who live in poor areas, are also subjected to racism and police brutality”
  • asylum rights cannot be compromised»Rätten att söka asyl kan aldrig tummas på, vi kräver att endast permanenta uppehållstillstånd ska utfärdas vid beviljad asyl.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The right to seek asylum can never be compromised, we demand that only permanent residence permits be issued upon granted asylum.”
  • equal treatment»Myndigheter har ett särskilt ansvar att möta alla människor« (party programme ↗)“Authorities have a special responsibility to meet all people”
SSocialdemokraternaYesYesfollows the planderived

The plan wants secrecy barriers between authorities to be torn down and the police to have more tools to do their job, and maintains a strict migration policy.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan wants secrecy barriers between authorities to be torn down and the police to have more tools to do their job, and maintains a strict migration policy. Not implementing the bill's provisions on internal controls, reporting requirements and identity clarification goes against those commitments. The plan's requirements for privacy protection and combating discrimination justify legal certainty guarantees, but not stopping the proposal.

Original (Swedish)

Planen vill att sekretesshinder mellan myndigheter rivs och att polisen får fler verktyg för att kunna göra sitt jobb, och håller fast vid en stram migrationspolitik. Att inte genomföra lagförslagets delar om inre kontroller, uppgiftsskyldighet och identitetsklarläggande går emot de åtagandena. Planens krav på integritetsskydd och bekämpad diskriminering motiverar rättssäkerhetsgarantier, men inte att förslaget stoppas.

  • more tools for the policedecisive»Polisen behöver också fler verktyg, som bättre möjligheter till avlyssning och husrannsakan.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The police also need more tools, such as better capabilities for wiretapping and house searches.”
  • strict migration policy»Vi har stramat åt migrationspolitiken, och denna linje ligger fast.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We have tightened migration policy, and this line is firm.”
  • personal privacy»Skydd för den personliga integriteten.« (party programme ↗)“Protection of personal privacy.”
  • countered discrimination»Bekämpande av rasism och diskriminering.« (party programme ↗)“Combating racism and discrimination.”
MPMiljöpartietNoNofollows the planderived

The counter-proposal wants to stop the new reporting obligation and expanded identification authority, citing the risk of ethnic profiling and disproportionate infringements on privacy.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The counter-proposal wants to stop the new reporting obligation and expanded identification authority, citing the risk of ethnic profiling and disproportionate infringements on privacy. The plan states that human rights encompass everyone, even undocumented persons, that the state shall respect personal integrity and that work against all racism must be strengthened. A humane and legally secure migration policy is the plan's explicit line.

Original (Swedish)

Motförslaget vill stoppa den nya uppgiftsskyldigheten och de utvidgade identitetsbefogenheterna, med hänvisning till risk för etnisk profilering och oproportionerliga ingrepp i privatlivet. Planen slår fast att de mänskliga rättigheterna omfattar alla, även papperslösa, att staten ska respektera den personliga integriteten och att arbetet mot all rasism måste stärkas. En human och rättssäker migrationspolitik är planens uttryckliga linje.

  • rights even for undocumented personsdecisive»omfattar alla, även människor på flykt och papperslösa.« (party programme ↗)“encompass everyone, even people in flight and undocumented persons.”
  • respect for personal integrity»Staten har ansvar både för att skydda människor från brott och för att respektera« (party programme ↗)“The state has the responsibility both to protect people from crime and to respect”
  • counter ethnic profiling»Arbetet mot all typ av rasism måste stärkas. Antisemitism, islamofobi och afrofobi är« (party programme ↗)“Work against all types of racism must be strengthened. Anti-Semitism, Islamophobia and Afrophobia are”
  • humane and legally secure migration policy»Vi gröna står för en human och rättssäker migrationspolitik. I en tid där människor som« (party programme ↗)“We Greens stand for a humane and legally secure migration policy. In a time when people who”
CCenterpartietNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The election manifesto explicitly says no to search zones, collective punishment and preventive tapping, and the party programme requires proportionality between legislation's intrusion and its purpose.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The election manifesto explicitly says no to search zones, collective punishment and preventive tapping, and the party programme requires proportionality between legislation's intrusion and its purpose. To seize mobile phones for up to three months and lower the threshold for internal controls contradicts this, as does the risk of ethnic profiling that the plan commits itself to counteracting. The counter-proposal's demands are therefore in line with the plan.

Original (Swedish)

Valmanifestet säger uttryckligen nej till visitationszoner, kollektiv bestraffning och preventiv avlyssning, och partiprogrammet kräver proportionalitet mellan lagstiftningens intrång och dess syfte. Att omhänderta mobiltelefoner i upp till tre månader och sänka tröskeln för inre kontroller står i strid med det, liksom risken för etnisk profilering som planen förbinder sig att motverka. Motförslagets krav ligger därför i linje med planen.

  • no to general coercive measuresdecisive»Rättsstaten och individens rättigheter gentemot staten måste försvaras. Vi säger därför nej till visitationszoner, kollektiv bestraffning, omvänd bevisbörda, anonyma vittnen, preventiv avlyssning och inskränkningar av religionsfriheten.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The rule of law and the individual's rights against the state must be defended. We therefore say no to search zones, collective punishment, reversed burden of proof, anonymous witnesses, preventive tapping and restrictions on freedom of religion.”
  • proportionality»Det måste finnas en proportionalitet mellan lagstiftningens inskränkning av medborgarnas integritet och lagarnas syfte.« (party programme ↗)“There must be proportionality between legislation's restriction of citizens' privacy and the laws' purpose.”
  • counter ethnic profiling»Diskriminering, strukturell rasism och intolerans, i alla dess former, ska motverkas.« (party programme ↗)“Discrimination, structural racism and intolerance, in all its forms, shall be countered.”
  • personal privacy»Respekten för den enskildes personliga integritet är en grundsten i varje demokrati.« (party programme ↗)“Respect for the individual's personal privacy is a cornerstone of every democracy.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

LLiberalernaYesYesfollows the planderived

The counter-proposal wants the bill not to be implemented in the part concerning internal controls, reporting obligations and expanded identity tools.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The counter-proposal wants the bill not to be implemented in the part concerning internal controls, reporting obligations and expanded identity tools. The plan establishes that those without asylum grounds should leave the country and wants more persons awaiting return and deportation to be held in custody, thus more effective return. The plan's requirements for proportionality in privacy intrusions and against discrimination place demands on the design but do not support rejection.

Original (Swedish)

Motförslaget vill att lagförslaget inte genomförs i den del som gäller inre kontroller, uppgiftsskyldighet och utökade identitetsverktyg. Planen slår fast att den som saknar asylskäl ska lämna landet och vill att fler som väntar på av- och utvisning hålls i förvar, alltså ett mer verkningsfullt återvändande. Planens krav på proportionalitet vid integritetsingrepp och mot diskriminering ställer krav på utformningen men bär inte ett avslag.

  • effective returndecisive»Asylrätten ska värnas där den med asylskäl ska stanna och den utan skäl lämnar landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The right to asylum should be valued where those with asylum grounds stay and those without grounds leave the country.”
  • custody pending deportation»Fler som väntar på både utvisning och avvisning ska hållas i förvar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“More persons awaiting both deportation and refusal of entry should be held in custody.”
  • proportionality in privacy intrusions»Åtgärder som påverkar den personliga integriteten negativt är endast berättigade om ett motstående intresse väger uppenbart tyngre och åtgärden är effektiv.« (party programme ↗)“Measures affecting personal privacy negatively are only justified if a competing interest clearly outweighs it and the measure is effective.”
  • against discrimination»Därför ska staten med kraft bekämpa all slags rasism, diskriminering och intolerans.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Therefore, the state must vigorously combat all kinds of racism, discrimination and intolerance.”
KDKristdemokraternaYesYesfollows the planderived

The counter-proposal wants the bill's parts on internal controls, reporting obligations and identity tools not to be implemented.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The counter-proposal wants the bill's parts on internal controls, reporting obligations and identity tools not to be implemented. The election manifesto requires a strict immigration policy and a total review of secrecy rules so that authorities can share information, and the programme wants to counteract irregular migration. Integrity protection speaks for proportionality in application, but not for refraining from the tools.

Original (Swedish)

Motförslaget vill att lagförslagets delar om inre kontroller, uppgiftsskyldighet och identitetsverktyg inte genomförs. Valmanifestet kräver en stram migrationspolitik och en total översyn av sekretessreglerna så att myndigheter kan dela uppgifter, och programmet vill motverka irreguljär migration. Integritetsskyddet talar för proportionalitet i tillämpningen, men inte för att avstå från verktygen.

  • strict immigration policydecisive»Stram migrationspolitik krävs för att ta itu med integrationsproblem och utanförskap.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strict immigration policy is required to address integration problems and exclusion.”
  • counteract irregular migration»säkra land. Vi vill motverka irreguljär migration, motverka människosmuggling och ha ett« (party programme ↗)“secure country. We want to counteract irregular migration, counteract human smuggling and have a”
  • authorities shall share information»Total översyn av sekretessreglerna, så att myndigheter kan dela uppgifter mellan sig för att förebygga och klara upp brott.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Total review of secrecy rules, so that authorities can share information with each other to prevent and solve crimes.”
  • protection for personal integrity»Den personliga integriteten ska ha ett starkt grundlagsskydd och det« (party programme ↗)“Personal integrity shall have strong constitutional protection and it”
MModeraternaYesYesfollows the planderived

The plan establishes that those who have been denied shall leave the country as soon as possible and that the alternative is a growing shadow society with vulnerability and crime.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan establishes that those who have been denied shall leave the country as soon as possible and that the alternative is a growing shadow society with vulnerability and crime. It also wants to determine who actually lives in Sweden. Stopping the new tools for internal control, information provision and identity clarification goes directly against this, even though the plan protects personal integrity. The requirement is rejected.

Original (Swedish)

Planen slår fast att den som fått avslag så fort som möjligt ska lämna landet och att alternativet är ett växande skuggsamhälle med utsatthet och brottslighet. Den vill dessutom fastställa vilka som faktiskt lever i Sverige. Att stoppa de nya verktygen för inre kontroll, uppgiftslämnande och identitetsklarläggande går rakt emot det, även om planen värnar personlig integritet. Kravet avvisas.

  • quick return on denialdecisive»Av största vikt är att den som fått ett nej på asylansökan så fort som möjligt lämnar landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It is of utmost importance that those who have been denied asylum leave the country as soon as possible.”
  • prevent shadow society»Vi riskerar annars ett växande skuggsamhälle, med social utsatthet, illegalt arbete och brottslighet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Otherwise we risk a growing shadow society, with social vulnerability, illegal work and crime”
  • control over who resides in the country»Ett viktigt första steg är att fastställa vilka som lever i Sverige och att stoppa fusket med tillfälliga personnummer – samordningsnummer.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“An important first step is to determine who lives in Sweden and to stop fraud with temporary identification numbers – coordination numbers.”
  • protected personal integrity»Den personliga integriteten ska värnas, såväl från intrång« (party programme ↗)“Personal integrity shall be protected, both from intrusions”
SDSverigedemokraternaYesYesfollows the planexplicit

The election manifesto requires that the shadow economy be combated with more inspections and more deportations and that the thresholds for detention and enforcement be lowered.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The election manifesto requires that the shadow economy be combated with more inspections and more deportations and that the thresholds for detention and enforcement be lowered. The counter-proposal wants to stop precisely those tools that give authorities notification obligations, internal control, and the ability to clarify identity. The plan therefore speaks against the counter-proposal's demands and instead lies behind the bill in substance.

Original (Swedish)

Valmanifestet kräver att skuggsamhället bekämpas med fler kontroller och fler utvisningar och att trösklarna för förvar och verkställighet sänks. Motförslaget vill stoppa just de verktyg som ger myndigheterna uppgiftsskyldighet, inre kontroll och möjlighet att klarlägga identitet. Planen talar därför emot motförslagets krav och ligger tvärtom bakom lagförslaget i sak.

  • more inspections and deportationsdecisive»Bekämpa skuggsamhället och illegal migration med fler kontroller och fler utvisningar« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Combat the shadow economy and illegal migration with more inspections and more deportations”
  • lowered deportation thresholds»Trösklarna för att ta i förvar och utvisa personer samt verkställa utvisningar behöver också sänkas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The thresholds for detention, deportation of persons, and enforcement of deportations also need to be lowered.”
  • strengthened cooperation between authorities»Rättsväsendets samverkan mellan myndigheter och verktyg för att upptäcka och lagföra kriminella ska förbättras.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Cooperation between authorities and tools to detect and prosecute criminals should be improved.”
  • focus on return»Sverige behöver vända decennier av oansvarig massinvandring till att fokusera på frivillig återvändandeverksamhet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden needs to turn decades of irresponsible mass immigration towards focusing on voluntary return activities.”

Share and embed

Embed as a widget (iframe): previewSizeLanguage

Sources and documents

Documents under consideration

Source: The Swedish Parliament