2025-11-262025/26:CU6 · p.1CUCivil law & housing
More comprehensive criminal liability for attacks on trade secrets
Broader criminal liability for attacks on trade secrets, including biometric searches of the Migration Agency's registers
What's at stake: The proposal is meant to give law enforcement better tools against state-directed disclosure of technical trade secrets - a crime that is hard to investigate and that harms Swedish companies' research and competitiveness, and thus jobs and security. The price is an intrusion on privacy: fingerprints and photos people submitted in migration cases may be used in criminal investigations, which affects a large group who are not suspected of anything.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the government's bill on criminal liability for attacks on trade secrets should be adopted in full, including the power to run biometric comparisons against the Migration Agency's registers of fingerprints and photographs, or whether that part should be rejected on privacy grounds.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee holds that parliament should adopt the government's bill, with one editorial change, and reject the motion. Law enforcement needs effective tools to investigate state-directed unlawful disclosure of technical trade secrets, since it is a crime that is hard to investigate, and the committee judges that the government has struck an appropriate balance between the need for and expected benefit of biometric comparisons against the Migration Agency's registers on the one hand and the privacy intrusion this entails on the other. It therefore backs allowing biometric comparison against the Migration Agency's registers of fingerprints and photographs for such crime. Otherwise the committee notes that no motion opposes the legislative proposals in substance; the change is that the new offence designation in section 26 a of the Trade Secrets Act must be underlined so that the italics remain when the act is published.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 1 (MP)
The reservation (MP) wants to safeguard personal privacy and limit the use of the Migration Agency's registers for law enforcement. It therefore wants to reject the government's proposed amendment to the act on police processing of personal data under the Criminal Data Act, while adopting the other legislative proposals.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: adopting the government's legislative proposal and rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 1 by MP.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have held
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: LLiberalerna
Ja 281–15Ja 269–27
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Yes 16/1/0/5 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
| S | Yes | Yes 93/0/0/13 | match | confidence: medium | derived |
| MP | No | No 0/14/0/4 | match | confidence: medium | derived |
| C | No | Yes 20/0/0/4 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
| L | No | Yes 12/0/0/4 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: medium | explicit |
| KD | Yes | Yes 16/0/0/3 | match | confidence: medium | derived |
| M | Yes | Yes 60/0/0/8 | match | confidence: medium | derived |
| SD | Yes | Yes 61/0/0/11 | match | confidence: high | derived |
Broke with the party line
| VIda Gabrielsson (V, Stockholms kommun) | No — party line: Yes |
MPs whose vote differs from their party's majority position in this division. Marked with a dark ring in the chamber view.
Committee proposal
Parliament adopts the government's proposals for 1. act amending the act (2018:558) on trade secrets, with the change that the term "unlawful use or unlawful disclosure of technical trade secret" in section 26 a first paragraph shall be replaced with "unlawful use or unlawful disclosure of technical trade secret", 2. act amending the code of judicial procedure, 3. act amending the act (2007:979) on measures to prevent certain particularly serious crimes, 4. act amending the act (2024:562) on amendment of the act (2007:979) on measures to prevent certain particularly serious crimes, 5. act amending the act (2012:278) on gathering of information on electronic communications in the crime prevention authorities' intelligence activities, 6. act amending the act (2018:1693) on the police's processing of personal data within the crime database area, 7. act amending the act (2024:326) on secret coercive measures for the purpose of enforcing custodial sentences. Parliament thereby approves Proposition 2024/25:208 points 1-7 and rejects motion 2025/26:209 by Amanda Palmstierna et al. (MP).
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen antar regeringens förslag till 1. lag om ändring i lagen (2018:558) om företagshemligheter, med den ändringen att uttrycket ”olovligt utnyttjande eller olovligt röjande av teknisk företagshemlighet” i 26 a § första stycket ska bytas ut mot ”olovligt utnyttjande eller olovligt röjande av teknisk företagshemlighet”, 2. lag om ändring i rättegångsbalken, 3. lag om ändring i lagen (2007:979) om åtgärder för att förhindra vissa särskilt allvarliga brott, 4. lag om ändring i lagen (2024:562) om ändring i lagen (2007:979) om åtgärder för att förhindra vissa särskilt allvarliga brott, 5. lag om ändring i lagen (2012:278) om inhämtning av uppgifter om elektronisk kommunikation i de brottsbekämpande myndigheternas underrättelseverksamhet, 6. lag om ändring i lagen (2018:1693) om polisens behandling av personuppgifter inom brottsdatalagens område, 7. lag om ändring i lagen (2024:326) om hemliga tvångsmedel i syfte att verkställa frihetsberövande påföljder. Därmed bifaller riksdagen proposition 2024/25:208 punkterna 1-7 och avslår motion 2025/26:209 av Amanda Palmstierna m.fl. (MP).
Riksdag decision: Parliament approved the government's proposal to criminalize unlawful use and disclosure of technical trade secrets. The decision means that it becomes punishable to without permission use or disclose trade secrets, even when the person through, for example, their employment had lawful access to the information. The criminalization applies to technical trade secrets, that is trade secrets that are important for technical development. This can, for example, involve drawings, processes or research results. The law changes begin to apply on January 1, 2026.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to protect personal integrity and limit the use of the Migration Board's register for crime-fighting. (MP) — Reservation 1
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan establishes that all people have the right to protection of their personal integrity and that those seeking asylum shall be guaranteed an individual and legally secure assessment under dignified circumstances.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that all people have the right to protection of their personal integrity and that those seeking asylum shall be guaranteed an individual and legally secure assessment under dignified circumstances. Using the migration agency's fingerprint and photo register for crime prevention makes asylum seekers a particularly monitored group, which clashes with that and with the plan's requirement that the legal system makes up for its racist legacy. The counter-proposal's limitation of register use is therefore supported by the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att alla människor har rätt till skydd av sin personliga integritet och att den som söker asyl ska garanteras en individuell och rättssäker prövning under värdiga omständigheter. Att använda migrationsmyndighetens fingeravtrycks- och fotoregister för brottsbekämpning gör asylsökande till en särskilt övervakad grupp, vilket krockar med det och med planens krav på att rättsväsendet gör upp med sitt rasistiska arv. Motförslagets begränsning av registeranvändningen stöds därför av planen.
- personal integritydecisive»Alla människor har rätt till skydd av sin personliga integritet.« (party programme ↗)“All people have the right to protection of their personal integrity.”
- dignified asylum assessment»Här ska den som söker asyl garanteras sin rätt till en individuell och rättssäker prövning under värdiga omständigheter.« (party programme ↗)“Here those seeking asylum shall be guaranteed their right to an individual and legally secure assessment under dignified circumstances.”
- legal system's racist legacy»Rättsväsendet har historiska problem som kommer ur klassamhället, patriarkatet och rasistiskt tankegods och behöver ett aktivt och medvetet arbete för att lägga det bakom sig.« (party programme ↗)“The legal system has historical problems stemming from class society, patriarchy and racist ideology and needs active and conscious work to move past them.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto establishes that Sweden must be able to defend itself against espionage and cyberattacks and that the police need more tools, while secrecy barriers between authorities should be torn down.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto establishes that Sweden must be able to defend itself against espionage and cyberattacks and that the police need more tools, while secrecy barriers between authorities should be torn down. Restricting the use of the migration authority's register in state-directed disclosure of technical trade secrets goes against this. The protection of personal privacy qualifies the balancing but does not support the counter-proposal's demand.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet slår fast att Sverige måste kunna försvara sig mot spionage och cyberangrepp och att polisen behöver fler verktyg, samtidigt som sekretesshinder mellan myndigheter ska rivas. Att begränsa användningen av migrationsmyndighetens register vid statsstyrt röjande av tekniska företagshemligheter går emot detta. Skyddet för den personliga integriteten kvalificerar avvägningen men bär inte motförslagets krav.
- defense against espionagedecisive»Vi måste kunna försvara oss militärt, men också mot hybridattacker, spionage och cyberangrepp.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We must be able to defend ourselves militarily, but also against hybrid attacks, espionage and cyberattacks.”
- more tools for the police»Polisen behöver också fler verktyg, som bättre möjligheter till avlyssning och husrannsakan.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The police also need more tools, such as better capabilities for wiretapping and house searches.”
- torn down secrecy barriers»Sekretesshinder mellan myndigheter ska rivas så att polisen och andra yrkesgrupper kan göra sitt jobb.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Secrecy barriers between authorities should be torn down so that the police and other professions can do their job.”
- protection of personal privacy»Skydd för den personliga integriteten.« (party programme ↗)“Protection of personal privacy.”
The plan establishes that the state should both protect against crime and respect personal integrity and that crime prevention must not happen at the expense of rule-of-law principles.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that the state should both protect against crime and respect personal integrity and that crime prevention must not happen at the expense of rule-of-law principles. Using the migration authority's register of fingerprints and photos for crime prevention affects a particularly vulnerable group whose legal certainty the plan explicitly wants to strengthen. The counter-proposal's demand that precisely this part is not implemented is therefore in line with the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att staten både ska skydda mot brott och respektera den personliga integriteten och att brottsbekämpning inte får ske på bekostnad av rättsstatens principer. Att använda migrationsmyndighetens register över fingeravtryck och foton för brottsbekämpning drabbar en särskilt utsatt grupp vars rättssäkerhet planen uttryckligen vill stärka. Motförslagets krav att just den delen inte genomförs ligger därför i linje med planen.
- integrity weighed against crime preventiondecisive»Staten har ansvar både för att skydda människor från brott och för att respektera« (party programme ↗)“The state has responsibility both to protect people from crime and to respect”
- rule of law before efficiency»Brottsbekämpning ska inte ske på bekostnad av« (party programme ↗)“Crime prevention must not happen at the expense of”
- legal certainty for asylum seekers»stärka rättssäkerheten i asylprocessen och stödet för hbtqi-flyktingar och andra sårbara grupper.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“strengthen legal certainty in the asylum process and support for LGBTQI refugees and other vulnerable groups”
- careful legal certainty review»prövas noggrant utifrån rättssäkerhet och grundläggande fri- och rättigheter.« (party programme ↗)“carefully tested on the basis of legal certainty and fundamental freedoms and rights.”
flags: citat_migrerat
The plan requires that all legislation is tested against its impact on personal privacy and that the restriction stands in proportion to the purpose, and characterizes strong privacy protection as indispensable.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that all legislation is tested against its impact on personal privacy and that the restriction stands in proportion to the purpose, and characterizes strong privacy protection as indispensable. Opening the migration authority's fingerprint and photo register for biometric comparisons in criminal investigations is a privacy intrusion against people who provided the information for a completely different purpose. The plan's forceful action against crime weighs against but does not carry precisely this register.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att all lagstiftning prövas mot sin påverkan på den personliga integriteten och att inskränkningen står i proportion till syftet, och betecknar ett starkt integritetsskydd som omistligt. Att öppna migrationsmyndighetens fingeravtrycks- och fotoregister för biometriska jämförelser i brottsutredningar är ett integritetsintrång mot personer som lämnat uppgifterna i ett helt annat syfte. Planens krafttag mot brottslighet väger emot men bär inte just detta register.
- privacy assessment of all legislationweak support»All lagstiftning bör prövas mot dess påverkan på människors personliga integritet.« (party programme ↗)“All legislation should be tested against its impact on people's personal privacy.”
- no to rights-restricting measuresdecisive»Rättsstaten och individens rättigheter gentemot staten måste försvaras. Vi säger därför nej till visitationszoner, kollektiv bestraffning, omvänd bevisbörda, anonyma vittnen, preventiv avlyssning och inskränkningar av religionsfriheten.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The rule of law and the individual's rights against the state must be defended. We therefore say no to search zones, collective punishment, reversed burden of proof, anonymous witnesses, preventive tapping and restrictions on freedom of religion.”
- strong privacy protection»Ett starkt integritetsskydd är därför en omistlig del av ett öppet och demokratiskt samhälle.« (party programme ↗)“Strong privacy protection is therefore an indispensable part of an open and democratic society.”
- forceful action against crime»Samhället ska inte vika sig för gängen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Society must not yield to gangs.”
flags: citat_svagt
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan establishes that surveillance and registration should not be used for purposes other than the original reasons, which is precisely what biometric searching in the migration authority's register for crime prevention entails.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that surveillance and registration should not be used for purposes other than the original reasons, which is precisely what biometric searching in the migration authority's register for crime prevention entails. It also requires that privacy intrusions are only justified when a competing interest clearly outweighs it. The counter-proposal's requirement that precisely that part be removed thus follows from the plan, even though the plan elsewhere wants to give police more tools.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att övervakning och registrering inte ska användas för andra syften än de ursprungliga motiven, vilket är precis vad en biometrisk sökning i migrationsmyndighetens register för brottsbekämpning innebär. Den ställer dessutom krav på att integritetsintrång bara är berättigade när ett motstående intresse väger uppenbart tyngre. Motförslagets krav att just den delen utgår följer därför av planen, trots att planen på annat håll vill ge polisen fler verktyg.
- no mission creep in registersdecisive»Övervakning och registrering ska inte användas för andra syften än vad som var de ursprungliga motiven eller vad som var känt för den individ som lämnade uppgifterna.« (party programme ↗)“Surveillance and registration should not be used for purposes other than what were the original reasons or what was known to the individual who provided the data.”
- proportionality in privacy intrusions»Åtgärder som påverkar den personliga integriteten negativt är endast berättigade om ett motstående intresse väger uppenbart tyngre och åtgärden är effektiv.« (party programme ↗)“Measures affecting personal privacy negatively are only justified if a competing interest clearly outweighs it and the measure is effective.”
- privacy review of legislation»Alla nya lagförslag ska analyseras ur integritetssynpunkt.« (party programme ↗)“All new legislative proposals should be analysed from a privacy perspective.”
- more tools for police»Avlyssning och andra hemliga tvångsmedel ska kunna användas både vid misstanke om fler brott än i dag« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Wiretapping and other secret coercive measures can be used both when suspicion of more crimes than today”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The election manifesto requires a total review of secrecy rules so that authorities can share information with each other to prevent and solve crimes, and the party programme requires cooperation across agency boundaries and that all crimes be prosecuted.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto requires a total review of secrecy rules so that authorities can share information with each other to prevent and solve crimes, and the party programme requires cooperation across agency boundaries and that all crimes be prosecuted. The counter-proposal's requirement to limit the use of the migration authority's register for crime prevention points in the opposite direction. The plan's strong protection for personal privacy is a genuine counterbalancing commitment, but the explicit requirement for information-sharing carries greater weight.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet kräver en total översyn av sekretessreglerna så att myndigheter kan dela uppgifter mellan sig för att förebygga och klara upp brott, och partiprogrammet kräver samarbete över myndighetsgränser och att alla brott beivras. Motförslagets krav på att begränsa användningen av migrationsmyndighetens register för brottsbekämpning går i motsatt riktning. Planens starka skydd för den personliga integriteten är ett verkligt motstående åtagande, men det uttryckliga kravet på uppgiftsdelning väger tyngre.
- authorities shall share informationdecisive»Total översyn av sekretessreglerna, så att myndigheter kan dela uppgifter mellan sig för att förebygga och klara upp brott.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Total review of secrecy rules, so that authorities can share information with each other to prevent and solve crimes.”
- cooperation across agency boundaries»För att möta den internationella brottsutvecklingen krävs ett väl fungerande samarbete över« (party programme ↗)“To meet international crime development requires well-functioning cooperation across”
- crimes shall be prosecuted without exception»Alla brott ska effektivt och utan undantag beivras,« (party programme ↗)“All crimes shall be effectively and without exception prosecuted,”
- protection for personal integrity»Den personliga integriteten ska ha ett starkt grundlagsskydd« (party programme ↗)“Personal integrity shall have strong constitutional protection”
The plan wants the state to stand with full force behind companies subjected to espionage and attacks by foreign powers and to strengthen the Security Police's capacity.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants the state to stand with full force behind companies subjected to espionage and attacks by foreign powers and to strengthen the Security Police's capacity. To remove the proposed possibility for biometric comparisons would remove a tool against state-controlled disclosure of technical business secrets. The plan sees freedom and security as compatible and therefore speaks against the counter-proposal's demand.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill att staten står med full kraft bakom företag som utsätts för spionage och angrepp från främmande makt och att Säkerhetspolisens förmåga stärks. Att stryka den föreslagna möjligheten till biometriska jämförelser skulle ta bort ett verktyg mot statsstyrt röjande av tekniska företagshemligheter. Planen ser frihet och trygghet som förenliga och talar därför emot motförslagets krav.
- protection against espionagedecisive»Ge företag som är engagerade i säkerhetskänslig verksamhet bättre stöd från staten att kunna möta cyberattacker, spionage och stöldförsök från främmande makt« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Give companies engaged in security-sensitive activities better support from the state to meet cyber attacks, espionage and theft attempts from foreign powers”
- strengthened security service»Stärka Säkerhetspolisen för att öka deras förmåga att skydda den liberala demokratin och landets alla medborgare« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strengthen the Security Police to increase their capacity to protect liberal democracy and all citizens of the country”
- crimes against companies prioritized»Ge Brå i uppdrag att kartlägga brott mot företag« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Commission the Crime Survey to map crimes against companies”
- security as a condition for freedom»Frihet och trygghet går hand i hand.« (party programme ↗)“Freedom and security go hand in hand.”
The plan requires that the justice system's tools for detecting and prosecuting criminals are improved, that procedural obstacles to increased prosecution are removed and that more controls are used against the shadow economy.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that the justice system's tools for detecting and prosecuting criminals are improved, that procedural obstacles to increased prosecution are removed and that more controls are used against the shadow economy. The counter-proposal instead wants to stop police's ability to make biometric comparisons against the immigration authority's register. It removes one such tool in a criminality directed against Swedish industry and which the plan wants to protect.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att rättsväsendets verktyg för att upptäcka och lagföra kriminella förbättras, att processuella hinder för ökad lagföring undanröjs och att fler kontroller används mot skuggsamhället. Motförslaget vill i stället stoppa polisens möjlighet att göra biometriska jämförelser mot migrationsmyndighetens register. Det tar bort ett sådant verktyg i en brottslighet som riktas mot svensk industri och som planen vill skydda.
- tools for the judiciarydecisive»Rättsväsendets samverkan mellan myndigheter och verktyg för att upptäcka och lagföra kriminella ska förbättras.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The justice system's cooperation between authorities and tools for detecting and prosecuting criminals should be improved.”
- removed obstacles»Processuella hinder för att möjliggöra en ökad lagföring måste också undanröjas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Procedural obstacles to enabling increased prosecution must also be removed.”
- more controls»Bekämpa skuggsamhället och illegal migration med fler kontroller och fler utvisningar« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Combat the shadow economy and illegal migration with more controls and more deportations”
- protect Swedish industry»Prioritera svensk industri och konkurrenskraft« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Prioritize Swedish industry and competitiveness”
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2025/26:CU6)
- Committee report full text (HD01CU6)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2025/26:209 — med anledning av prop. 2024/25:208 Ett mer heltäckande straffansvar vid angrepp på företagshemligheter av Amanda Palmstierna m.fl. (MP)
- Proposition 2024/25:208 — Ett mer heltäckande straffansvar vid angrepp på företagshemligheter
Source: The Swedish Parliament