2024-11-272024/25:CU4 · p.3CUCivil law & housing
Judges' Competence
Requiring child-development competence for judges in custody cases
What's at stake: How well judges understand children's development and reactions to violence affects the quality of best-interests assessments in custody disputes, which has direct consequences for the children and families whose lives are decided in court.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
Parliament decides whether judges handling cases on custody, residence and contact should be subject to a statutory requirement for specific child-development competence, or whether today's voluntary training efforts are sufficient.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee agrees that judges handling cases on custody, residence and contact need sufficient knowledge and opportunities for continuous professional development, but finds the existing training options and the ongoing work at the National Courts Administration sufficient. It therefore sees no grounds to take further action, such as a statutory competence requirement.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 2 (V)
Judges ruling in family-law cases should be required to hold specific child-development competence, as a minimum requirement for handling cases on custody, residence and contact — since current voluntary training is too slow, and a lack of competence on children's development and reactions to violence otherwise risks harming individual children in complex disputes.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 2 by V.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have held
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: SDSverigedemokraterna
Ja 267–21Ja 204–84
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | No 0/21/0/3 | match | confidence: high | explicit |
| S | No | Yes 92/0/0/14 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| MP | No | Abstain 0/0/14/4 | differs | confidence: high | not addressed |
| C | No | Yes 21/0/0/3 | differs | confidence: low | not addressed |
| L | No | Yes 15/0/0/1 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
| KD | No | Yes 15/0/0/4 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
| M | Yes | Yes 59/0/0/9 | match | confidence: low | not addressed |
| SD | No | Yes 63/0/0/9 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2024/25:268 by Andreas Lennkvist Manriquez et al. (V) demand 5, 2024/25:1389 by Mikael Eskilandersson et al. (SD) demand 20, 2024/25:1755 by Katarina Luhr et al. (MP) demand 1 and 2024/25:2618 by Rasmus Ling et al. (MP) demand 21.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2024/25:268 av Andreas Lennkvist Manriquez m.fl. (V) yrkande 5, 2024/25:1389 av Mikael Eskilandersson m.fl. (SD) yrkande 20, 2024/25:1755 av Katarina Luhr m.fl. (MP) yrkande 1 och 2024/25:2618 av Rasmus Ling m.fl. (MP) yrkande 21.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag approved the government's proposal to strengthen child protection against violence in the home and to strengthen the security and stability of children placed in foster care. The proposals mean that special consideration shall be given to the risk that a child may be harmed when assessing what is in the best interest of the child in matters of custody, residence and contact. This shall be achieved through the following changes. Improve the district courts' decision basis when assessing whether a child risks being harmed. In difficult cases or matters concerning custody, residence and contact, the court shall request an expert opinion from a licensed psychologist. A child's right to contact with a parent the child does not live with shall only apply when the contact is consistent with the child's best interest. It shall be clarified which circumstances shall be taken into special consideration for it to become relevant to transfer custody from the child's parents to specially appointed guardians. When such assessment is conducted by the social committee and in court, a public representative shall as a rule be appointed for the child and its guardians. The amendments to the law come into force on 1 January 2025.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants judges who decide family law cases to have mandatory training in child competence. (V) — Reservation 2
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan explicitly requires increased knowledge within the legal system about violence against women and children and that the child perspective is strengthened in custody disputes.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan explicitly requires increased knowledge within the legal system about violence against women and children and that the child perspective is strengthened in custody disputes. A binding competence requirement for judges handling cases about custody, residence and contact is exactly such a measure, and voluntary training that proceeds too slowly is insufficient according to the plan's ambition. The plan also emphasizes that work against patriarchal violence must build on understanding the power patterns of violence.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver uttryckligen ökad kunskap inom rättsväsendet om våld mot kvinnor och barn och att barnperspektivet stärks i vårdnadstvister. Ett bindande kompetenskrav för domare som handlägger mål om vårdnad, boende och umgänge är just en sådan åtgärd, och frivillig utbildning som går för långsamt räcker inte enligt planens ambition. Planen betonar också att arbetet mot patriarkalt våld måste bygga på förståelse för våldets maktmönster.
- increased legal system knowledgedecisive»ökad kunskap inom rättsväsendet om samtycke och om våld mot kvinnor och barn« (2022 manifesto ↗)“increased knowledge within the legal system about consent and about violence against women and children”
- strengthened child perspective in custody disputes»Barnperspektivet måste stärkas i vårdnadstvister och det ska inte vara möjligt för våldsutövare att behålla gemensam vårdnad.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The child perspective must be strengthened in custody disputes and it should not be possible for perpetrators to retain joint custody.”
- understanding violence patterns»Arbetet mot det patriarkala våldet behöver bygga på en förståelse för« (party programme ↗)“Work against patriarchal violence needs to build on an understanding of”
- prioritize work against violence»våld mot kvinnor behöver börja prioriteras på ett sätt som motsvarar« (party programme ↗)“violence against women needs to begin being prioritized in a way that corresponds to”
The party programme establishes children's right to a secure upbringing according to the Convention on the Rights of the Child and to equal conditions, and the election manifesto promises measures against violence in close relationships.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme establishes children's right to a secure upbringing according to the Convention on the Rights of the Child and to equal conditions, and the election manifesto promises measures against violence in close relationships. A minimum requirement that judges in custody matters have knowledge of children's development and reactions to violence follows from this, since lack of competence would otherwise harm individual children. The plan also gives the state responsibility for competence supply.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet slår fast barns rätt till en trygg uppväxt enligt barnkonventionen och till likvärdiga villkor, och valmanifestet lovar krafttag mot våld i nära relationer. Ett minimikrav på att domare i vårdnadsmål har kunskap om barns utveckling och reaktioner på våld följer av det, eftersom bristande kompetens annars drabbar enskilda barn. Planen ger också staten ansvar för kompetensförsörjningen.
- the Convention governsdecisive»Alla barn ska ha rätt till en trygg uppväxt i enlighet med FN:s barnkonvention.« (party programme ↗)“All children shall have the right to a secure upbringing in accordance with the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child.”
- equal conditions for children»Alla barn och ungdomar ska ha rätt till likvärdiga villkor« (party programme ↗)“All children and young people shall have the right to equal conditions”
- against violence in close relationships»Krafttag för att stoppa hedersrelaterat våld, sexualbrott och mäns våld mot kvinnor.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Measures to stop honour-related violence, sexual crimes and men's violence against women.”
- state responsibility for competence»Staten har ett ansvar för att säkra kompetensförsörjningen, inte minst i välfärden.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The state has a responsibility to secure competence supply, not least in welfare.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan commits to protecting children from being forced into contact with a violent parent and states that the child's right to safety outweighs violent parents' right to their children.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan commits to protecting children from being forced into contact with a violent parent and states that the child's right to safety outweighs violent parents' right to their children. The child's legal certainty shall be strengthened in cases of suspected violence, and society's institutions shall have tools against violence. A competence requirement for judges in custody cases regarding children's reactions to violence follows from these commitments.
Original (Swedish)
Planen åtar sig att skydda barn från att tvingas till umgänge med en våldsam förälder och slår fast att barns rätt till trygghet väger tyngre än våldsamma föräldrars rätt till sina barn. Barnets rättstrygghet ska stärkas vid misstankar om våld, och samhällets institutioner ska ha verktyg mot våld. Ett kompetenskrav på domare i vårdnadsmål om barns reaktioner på våld följer av dessa åtaganden.
- protection against contact with violent parentdecisive»skydda barn från att tvingas till umgänge med en våldsam förälder.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“protect children from being forced into contact with a violent parent.”
- child's safety outweighs most»I vårt Sverige väger barns rätt till trygghet tyngre än våldsamma föräldrars rätt till sina barn.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“In our Sweden the child's right to safety outweighs violent parents' right to their children.”
- strengthened legal certainty for children»Barnets rättstrygghet måste stärkas om det« (party programme ↗)“The child's legal certainty must be strengthened if”
- institutions with tools against violence»beredskap och verktyg för att motverka patriarkalt« (party programme ↗)“readiness and tools to counteract patriarchal”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan requires that professional groups who work with children are trained so that violence and oppression can be detected faster, and that children's rights and perspective are put first in all of society's functions.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that professional groups who work with children are trained so that violence and oppression can be detected faster, and that children's rights and perspective are put first in all of society's functions. A competence requirement for judges who decide custody, residence and access cases is the same commitment applied to the court. The plan's protection of the independence of the courts is a qualification, but concerns the form rather than the requirement for competence.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att yrkesgrupper som möter barn utbildas för att våld och förtryck ska upptäckas snabbare, och att barnens rättigheter och perspektiv sätts först i samhällets alla funktioner. Ett kompetenskrav på domare som avgör vårdnads-, boende- och umgängesmål är samma åtagande tillämpat på domstolen. Planens värn om domstolarnas oberoende är en kvalifikation, men rör formen snarare än kravet på kompetens.
- training requirements for professional groupsdecisive»Skolpersonal och vårdpersonal bör utbildas och nationell frånvarostatistik införas för att snabbare kunna upptäcka hedersvåld.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“School and care staff should be trained and national absence statistics introduced to more quickly detect honour-based violence.”
- the child's perspective first»Samhällets aktörer ska inta individens perspektiv. Av största betydelse är då barnens rättigheter och perspektiv.« (party programme ↗)“Society's actors shall take the individual's perspective. Of utmost importance is then the rights and perspective of children.”
- protection for every child»Särskilt viktigt är att värna varje barns rätt att bli respekterad och att bli sedd för den man är.« (party programme ↗)“Particularly important is protecting each child's right to be respected and to be seen for who they are.”
- independence of the courts»Vi vill göra det svårare att ändra grundlagen, skydda oppositionens ställning i riksdagen och stärka domstolarnas oberoende.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to make it harder to change the constitution, protect the opposition's position in parliament and strengthen the independence of the courts.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The party programme requires that those participating in interviews with or of children have special training, and the election manifesto wants knowledge among professionals about violence and oppression to increase.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme requires that those participating in interviews with or of children have special training, and the election manifesto wants knowledge among professionals about violence and oppression to increase. A competency requirement for judges deciding cases on custody, residence and visiting rights follows from the same commitment, because lack of knowledge otherwise harms children in violence cases. That the requirement shall be enshrined in law is not addressed in the plan, so the coverage is derived.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet kräver att de som medverkar i förhör av eller med barn har särskild utbildning, och valmanifestet vill att kunskapen hos yrkesverksamma om våld och förtryck ökar. Ett kompetenskrav för domare som avgör mål om vårdnad, boende och umgänge följer av samma åtagande, eftersom bristande kunskap annars drabbar barn i våldsärenden. Att kravet ska lagstadgas behandlas inte i planen, varför täckningen är härledd.
- special competence on childrendecisive»De som medverkar i förhör av eller med barn ska ha särskild utbildning.« (party programme ↗)“Those who participate in interviews with or of children shall have special training.”
- increased professional knowledge»stöden till offren byggas ut, kunskapen hos yrkesverksamma öka« (2022 manifesto ↗)“support for victims be expanded, knowledge among professionals increase”
- action against violence»Vi vill se en ökad handlingskraft mot sexuellt våld och våld mot kvinnor genom bland annat högre straff för sexualbrott och ett bättre skydd och stöd för offren.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to see increased action against sexual violence and violence against women through, among other things, increased penalties for sexual offences and better protection and support for victims.”
- children's rights in the process»Barn och ungdomar har rätt att respekteras som individer och i takt med åldern få ta ett ökande« (party programme ↗)“Children and young people have the right to be respected as individuals and increasingly take part”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan establishes that effective handling of cases involving violence in close relationships presupposes well-trained staff in the relevant authorities, and that the child's best interests shall come first.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that effective handling of cases involving violence in close relationships presupposes well-trained staff in the relevant authorities, and that the child's best interests shall come first. Children have the right to a safe growing-up environment. A competence requirement on children's development and reactions to violence for judges in custody cases therefore follows from the plan, although the plan also protects the independence of the courts.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att effektiv handläggning av ärenden om våld i nära relationer förutsätter välutbildade medarbetare i de berörda myndigheterna, och att barnets bästa ska komma i främsta rummet. Barn har rätt till en trygg uppväxtmiljö. Ett kompetenskrav om barns utveckling och reaktioner på våld för domare i vårdnadsmål följer därför av planen, även om planen också värnar domstolarnas självständighet.
- competence in cases of violencedecisive»Effektiv handläggning av ärenden som rör våld i nära relationer förutsätter välutbildade medarbetare hos polis,« (party programme ↗)“Effective handling of cases involving violence in close relationships presupposes well-trained staff at the police,”
- the child's best interests first»barnets bästa ska komma i främsta rummet.« (party programme ↗)“the child's best interests shall come first.”
- safe upbringing»Barn har rätt till en trygg uppväxtmiljö.« (party programme ↗)“Children have the right to a safe growing-up environment.”
- the independence of the courts»bete. Domstolarna ska stå fria och oberoende från« (party programme ↗)“conduct. The courts shall remain free and independent from”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The counter-proposal wants to legislate a competence requirement for judges handling custody cases.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The counter-proposal wants to legislate a competence requirement for judges handling custody cases. The plan's line is that the independence of the courts shall be strengthened and that the court system itself shall have the ability to rule justly, which argues against politically determined qualification requirements for individual judges. The plan at the same time requires that violence against women and children be combated with great determination, but places that specialization with the police rather than with the courts. The conclusion is therefore a rejection, with low confidence.
Original (Swedish)
Motförslaget vill lagstifta om ett kompetenskrav för domare som handlägger vårdnadsmål. Planens linje är att domstolarnas oberoende ska stärkas och att domstolsväsendet självt ska ha förmågan att döma rättssäkert, vilket talar mot politiskt fastställda behörighetskrav på enskilda domare. Planen kräver samtidigt att våld mot kvinnor och barn bekämpas med stor bestämdhet, men lägger den specialiseringen hos polisen snarare än hos domstolarna. Slutsatsen blir därför ett avvisande, med låg säkerhet.
- court independencedecisive»Stärka domstolarnas oberoende och skyddet för medborgarnas fri- och rättigheter« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strengthen the independence of the courts and the protection of citizens' freedoms and rights”
- just judgment»med ett oberoende domstolsväsende som har förmågan att döma rättssäkert« (party programme ↗)“with an independent court system that has the ability to rule justly”
- specialization in police»Införa särskilda grupper i varje polisregion som är specialiserade på sexualbrott och våld i nära relation för att fler anmälda brott ska leda till lagföring och straff« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Introduce specialized groups in each police region specialized in sexual crimes and violence in close relationships so that more reported crimes lead to prosecution and punishment”
- violence against children combated»Det våld som inte minst riktas mot kvinnor och barn ska bekämpas med stor bestämdhet och tydliga konsekvenser.« (party programme ↗)“Violence that is directed especially against women and children shall be combated with great determination and clear consequences.”
The plan explicitly requires capacity-building measures for all who work with children, young people and family law matters and that investigations concerning children shall be quality-assured and legally secure.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan explicitly requires capacity-building measures for all who work with children, young people and family law matters and that investigations concerning children shall be quality-assured and legally secure. A competence requirement for judges ruling in cases concerning custody, residence and access is a direct application of that commitment. The plan's principle that the best interests of the child shall always be considered points in the same direction.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver uttryckligen kunskapshöjande åtgärder för alla som arbetar med barn, unga och familjerättsliga frågor och att utredningar om barn ska vara kvalitetssäkrade och rättssäkra. Ett kompetenskrav på domare som dömer i mål om vårdnad, boende och umgänge är en direkt tillämpning av det åtagandet. Planens princip att barnets bästa alltid ska beaktas pekar i samma riktning.
- competence requirements in family lawdecisive»Det behövs också kunskapshöjande åtgärder för alla som arbetar med barn och unga och familjerättsliga frågor.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Capacity-building measures are also needed for all who work with children, young people and family law matters.”
- quality-assured child investigations»Utredningar rörande barn ska vara kvalitetssäkrade och rättssäkra.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Investigations concerning children shall be quality-assured and legally secure.”
- legal security for children»Öka kvalité och rättssäkerhet i utredningar om barn« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Increase quality and legal security in investigations concerning children.”
- the best interests of the child»Att barnets bästa alltid ska beaktas« (2022 manifesto ↗)“That the best interests of the child shall always be considered.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2024/25:CU4)
- Committee report full text (HC01CU4)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2024/25:1389 — Familjerätt av Mikael Eskilandersson m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1755 — med anledning av prop. 2024/25:10 Tryggare hem för barn av Katarina Luhr m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2024/25:2481 — Barns rätt vid tvångsumgänge av Ida Ekeroth Clausson m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2024/25:2567 — Förenkla adoption av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2024/25:2618 — Åtgärder för att bekämpa mäns våld mot kvinnor av Rasmus Ling m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2024/25:268 — En familjepolitik med barnen i centrum av Andreas Lennkvist Manriquez m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2024/25:2857 — Vårdnad och umgänge på barnets villkor av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2024/25:762 — Barns rättigheter före föräldrarnas av Heléne Björklund och Magnus Manhammar (båda S)
- Motion 2024/25:806 — Barns rättigheter vid våld i nära relationer av Janine Alm Ericson m.fl. (MP)
- Proposition 2024/25:10 — Tryggare hem för barn
Source: The Swedish Parliament