2024-03-062023/24:FiU34 · p.9FiUEconomy & finance
Procurement, unscrupulous actors and national security
Public procurement, rogue operators and national security
What's at stake: The decision concerns how billions in public funds are protected from rogue companies engaged in tax evasion, criminal activity or exploitation of foreign labor, and how national security interests are safeguarded in procurement - affecting both taxpayers and vulnerable workers.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether additional measures beyond the ongoing work - such as an information portal for authorities, tougher vetting of bidders and tighter rules on switching from asylum to work-permit status - should be introduced to exclude rogue operators and safeguard national security interests in public procurement.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee rejects the motions, pointing to the ongoing work on coordinated background checks for contracting authorities and entities, as well as to the National Agency for Public Procurement's support for security-related procurements.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 11 (S)
The reservation wants it to become easier to exclude untrustworthy bidders, the Migration Agency's oversight to be strengthened, switching from asylum to work-permit status to be made harder where irregularities or exploitation are suspected, and an information portal to be set up where authorities can share information to support contracting authorities' assessment of suppliers' reliability.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 11 by S.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have held
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: VVänsterpartiet
Ja 187–94Ja 167–114
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Yes 20/0/0/4 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| S | No | No 0/93/0/13 | match | confidence: high | explicit |
| MP | No | Yes 15/0/0/3 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| C | No | Abstain 1/0/18/5 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| L | No | Yes 13/0/0/3 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
| KD | No | Yes 16/0/0/3 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
| M | No | Yes 60/0/0/8 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| SD | No | Yes 61/0/0/11 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
Broke with the party line
| CAlireza Akhondi (C, Stockholms län) | Yes — party line: Abstain |
MPs whose vote differs from their party's majority position in this division. Marked with a dark ring in the chamber view.
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2023/24:1314 by Hanna Westerén and Peder Björk (both S), 2023/24:2493 by Christofer Bergenblock et al. (C) point 8 and 2023/24:2647 by Mikael Damberg et al. (S) points 2-5.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2023/24:1314 av Hanna Westerén och Peder Björk (båda S), 2023/24:2493 av Christofer Bergenblock m.fl. (C) yrkande 8 och 2023/24:2647 av Mikael Damberg m.fl. (S) yrkandena 2-5.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag rejected approximately 50 proposals in motions on public procurement from the general motion period of 2023. The motions concern, among other things, how the framework for public procurement is designed, social criteria and animal welfare. The Riksdag refers, among other things, to the fact that the motion demands have been partly met.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to increase the share of idea-driven organizations' delivery of welfare services by allowing municipalities and regions to reserve procurements for non-profit actors. (S) — Reservation 11
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan requires that public procurement is used strategically to guarantee and strengthen labor rights and working conditions and that collective agreement requirements are set.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that public procurement is used strategically to guarantee and strengthen labor rights and working conditions and that collective agreement requirements are set. Making it easier to exclude unserious bidders and strengthening control against exploitation of foreign workers is the same commitment in practice. Wage dumping and economic crime are identified as central threats, and it is companies that are responsible for economic crimes.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att den offentliga upphandlingen används strategiskt för att garantera och stärka arbetsrätt och arbetsvillkor och att krav på kollektivavtal ställs. Att göra det lättare att utesluta oseriösa anbudsgivare och stärka kontrollen mot exploatering av utländsk arbetskraft är samma åtagande i praktiken. Lönedumpning och ekonomisk brottslighet pekas ut som centrala hot, och det är företagen som står för ekobrotten.
- strategic procurement for labor rightsdecisive»Den offentliga upphandlingen omfattar mycket stora ekonomiska värden. Den måste användas strategiskt av upphandlare på olika nivåer för att garantera och stärka arbetsrätt och arbetsvillkor.« (party programme ↗)“Public procurement comprises very large economic values. It must be used strategically by procurement officers at different levels to guarantee and strengthen labor rights and working conditions.”
- collective agreement requirement in procurement»Vänsterpartiet ställer krav på kollektivavtal vid offentliga upphandlingar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Left Party demands collective agreements in public procurement.”
- against wage dumping and economic crime»Lönedumpning, ekonomisk brottslighet och utnyttjande är centrala hot idag.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Wage dumping, economic crime and exploitation are central threats today.”
- control directed at companies»Det är företagen som överlägset står för de flesta ekobrotten, inte enskilda som fuskar med våra trygghetssystem.« (party programme ↗)“It is companies that overwhelmingly are responsible for most economic crimes, not individuals who cheat our social security systems.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The election manifesto requires that public procurement bodies shall be models in promoting fair competition and that welfare crime and tax evasion are stopped.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto requires that public procurement bodies shall be models in promoting fair competition and that welfare crime and tax evasion are stopped. It also wants to tear down secrecy barriers between authorities so they can do their job, which is precisely the counter-proposal's information portal for data sharing. Being able more easily to exclude unserious bidders follows directly from these commitments.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet kräver att offentliga upphandlare ska vara föredömen i att verka för sund konkurrens och att välfärdsbrottslighet och skattefusk stoppas. Det vill också riva sekretesshinder mellan myndigheter så att de kan göra sitt jobb, vilket är just motförslagets informationsportal för uppgiftsdelning. Att lättare kunna utesluta oseriösa anbudsgivare följer direkt av dessa åtaganden.
- procurement bodies as modelsdecisive»Krafttag mot arbetslivskriminaliteten. Arbetslivs kriminalitet ska inte finnas på svensk arbetsmarknad och offentliga arbetsgivare och upphandlare ska vara föredömen i att verka för en sund konkurrens.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Decisive action against workplace crime. Workplace crime shall not exist on the Swedish labour market and public employers and procurement bodies shall be models in promoting fair competition.”
- tear down secrecy barriers between authorities»Sekretesshinder mellan myndigheter ska rivas så att polisen och andra yrkesgrupper kan göra sitt jobb.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Secrecy barriers between authorities shall be torn down so that the police and other professions can do their job.”
- stop welfare crime»Skattefusk, välfärdsbrottslighet och penningtvätt ska stoppas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Tax evasion, welfare crime and money laundering shall be stopped.”
- no competition through exploitation»Det ska aldrig löna sig att begå brott eller skaffa sig konkurrensfördelar genom att försumma de anställdas rätt till en trygg arbetsmiljö.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It shall never pay to commit crime or gain competitive advantage by neglecting employees' right to a safe working environment.”
flags: citat_migrerat
The plan demands that social conditions and working environment are set as requirements in procurements and that all forms of corruption are combated.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan demands that social conditions and working environment are set as requirements in procurements and that all forms of corruption are combated. The counter-proposal's demands to more easily exclude unreliable bidders, strengthen control against exploitation of foreign workers and share information between authorities serve these commitments. The plan also wants to strengthen inter-agency cooperation to strike at criminal activity in corporate form.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att sociala villkor och arbetsmiljö ställs som krav i upphandlingar och att alla former av korruption motarbetas. Motförslagets krav på att lättare utesluta oseriösa anbudsgivare, stärka kontrollen mot exploatering av utländsk arbetskraft och dela uppgifter mellan myndigheter tjänar dessa åtaganden. Planen vill dessutom att myndighetssamverkan stärks för att slå mot kriminell verksamhet i företagsform.
- social requirements in procurementdecisive»I upphandlingar ska krav ställas vad gäller miljö, sociala villkor samt arbetsmiljö.« (party programme ↗)“In procurements requirements shall be set regarding environment, social conditions and working environment.”
- combat corruption»Alla former av korruption måste motarbetas.« (party programme ↗)“All forms of corruption must be combated.”
- strengthened inter-agency cooperation»stoppa finansieringen av de kriminella gängen genom att stärka myndighetssamverkan« (2022 manifesto ↗)“stop the financing of criminal gangs by strengthening inter-agency cooperation”
- quality before lowest price»Vid offentliga upphandlingar ska miljö- och kvalitetsaspekterna viktas betydligt tyngre än i dag.« (party programme ↗)“In public procurements environmental and quality aspects shall be weighted significantly more than today.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan wants to tighten rules against corruption, establish an anti-corruption agency and make Sweden more transparent, and it demands vigorous action against crimes that harm businesses.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to tighten rules against corruption, establish an anti-corruption agency and make Sweden more transparent, and it demands vigorous action against crimes that harm businesses. The party programme demands fair and predictable rules of the game and competition-neutral regulations. Making it easier to exclude unreliable bidders, strengthening control against exploitation of foreign labor and sharing information between authorities serves precisely these commitments.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill skärpa reglerna mot korruption, inrätta en antikorruptionsmyndighet och göra Sverige mer transparent, och den kräver krafttag mot brott som drabbar företag. Idéprogrammet kräver givna och förutsägbara spelregler och konkurrensneutrala regelverk. Att lättare kunna utesluta oseriösa anbudsgivare, stärka kontrollen mot exploatering av utländsk arbetskraft och dela uppgifter mellan myndigheter tjänar just dessa åtaganden.
- tightened rules against corruptiondecisive»Sverige ska bli ännu mer transparent. Vi vill inrätta en antikorruptionsmyndighet, skärpa regler mot korruption och införa ett lobbyregister.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden shall become even more transparent. We want to establish an anti-corruption agency, tighten rules against corruption and introduce a lobbying register.”
- vigorous action against crimes against businesses»krafttag mot brott emot företag« (2022 manifesto ↗)“vigorous action against crimes against businesses”
- predictable rules of the game»Ekonomin ska ha givna och förutsägbara spelregler« (party programme ↗)“The economy shall have fair and predictable rules of the game”
- competition neutrality»näringslivet får konkurrensneutrala regelverk« (party programme ↗)“business receives competition-neutral regulations”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan requires that laws and regulations protect fair competition and legal security, and that authorities can effectively share information with each other.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that laws and regulations protect fair competition and legal security, and that authorities can effectively share information with each other. More easily being able to exclude disreputable bidders, strengthening control against exploitation of foreign workers and establishing an information portal follow from these commitments. The plan also sees access to strategic assets by undemocratic states as a security question, which supports weighing national security interests in procurement.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att lagar och regler slår vakt om konkurrens på lika villkor och rättssäkerhet, och att myndigheter effektivt kan dela information med varandra. Att lättare kunna utesluta oseriösa anbudsgivare, stärka kontrollen mot exploatering av utländsk arbetskraft och inrätta en informationsportal följer av dessa åtaganden. Planen ser dessutom odemokratiska staters åtkomst till strategiska tillgångar som en säkerhetsfråga, vilket stöder att nationella säkerhetsintressen vägs in vid upphandling.
- fair competitiondecisive»slå vakt om äganderätt, konkurrens på lika villkor, rättssäkerhet« (party programme ↗)“protect property rights, fair competition, legal security”
- information sharing between authorities»myndigheter effektivt kan dela information med varandra.« (party programme ↗)“authorities can effectively share information with each other.”
- national security interests»odemokratiska eller rentav totalitära stater förvärvar strategiska tillgångar« (party programme ↗)“undemocratic or even totalitarian states acquire strategic assets”
- counter exploitation of workers»systemet för arbetskraftsinvandring inte ska missbrukas för till exempel svartjobb« (party programme ↗)“the system for labour immigration should not be abused for example for undeclared work”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto requires a comprehensive review of secrecy rules so that authorities can share information with each other, which is precisely what the information portal aims to do.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto requires a comprehensive review of secrecy rules so that authorities can share information with each other, which is precisely what the information portal aims to do. The plan furthermore gives the state the role of overseeing that legislation and good ethics are upheld in the market and that disloyal competition is countered. That it be easier to exclude unreliable bidders follows from this.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet kräver en total översyn av sekretessreglerna så att myndigheter kan dela uppgifter med varandra, vilket är precis vad informationsportalen syftar till. Planen ger dessutom staten rollen att övervaka att lagstiftning och god etik upprätthålls på marknaden och att illojal konkurrens motverkas. Att lättare kunna utesluta oseriösa anbudsgivare följer av detta.
- authorities shall share informationdecisive»Total översyn av sekretessreglerna, så att myndigheter kan dela uppgifter mellan sig för att förebygga och klara upp brott.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Comprehensive review of secrecy rules, so that authorities can share information between themselves to prevent and solve crimes.”
- good ethics in the market»lagstiftningen och en god etik upprätthålls på marknaden.« (party programme ↗)“legislation and good ethics are upheld in the market.”
- counter disloyal competition»effektiv konkurrenspolitik motverkar oligopol, monopol och illojal konkurrens.« (party programme ↗)“effective competition policy counters oligopoly, monopoly and disloyal competition.”
- stable institutions»effektiv konkurrens, stabila institutioner och etiskt handlande.« (party programme ↗)“effective competition, stable institutions and ethical conduct.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan's line is that tax funds shall not end up with unreliable recipients and that secrecy barriers between authorities shall be removed when they stand in the way of control, while public waste shall be combated.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's line is that tax funds shall not end up with unreliable recipients and that secrecy barriers between authorities shall be removed when they stand in the way of control, while public waste shall be combated. To more easily be able to exclude unreliable bidders and allow authorities to share information in an information portal is in line with this. The plan also promises government support to protect security-sensitive activities against foreign power.
Original (Swedish)
Planens linje är att skattemedel inte ska hamna hos oseriösa mottagare och att sekretesshinder mellan myndigheter ska undanröjas när de står i vägen för kontroll, samtidigt som offentligt slöseri ska bekämpas. Att lättare kunna utesluta oseriösa anbudsgivare och låta myndigheter dela uppgifter i en informationsportal ligger i linje med detta. Planen lovar också statligt stöd för att skydda säkerhetskänslig verksamhet mot främmande makt.
- no tax funds to unreliabledecisive»Stoppa utbetalningar av skattemedel till extremister« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Stop disbursement of tax funds to extremists”
- information sharing between authorities»Undanröja alla sekretesshinder mellan socialtjänst och polis« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Remove all secrecy barriers between social services and police”
- respect for tax funds»Offentligt slöseri i alla former ska bekämpas.« (party programme ↗)“Public waste in all forms shall be combated.”
- protection of security-sensitive activities»Ge företag som är engagerade i säkerhetskänslig verksamhet bättre stöd från staten att kunna möta cyberattacker, spionage och stöldförsök från främmande makt« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Give companies engaged in security-sensitive activities better support from the state to be able to meet cyber attacks, espionage and theft attempts from foreign power”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan points out shortcomings in public procurement and requires that fraud and systems that encourage fraud and corruption be counteracted, and that the cooperation of authorities and tools to detect criminals be improved.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan points out shortcomings in public procurement and requires that fraud and systems that encourage fraud and corruption be counteracted, and that the cooperation of authorities and tools to detect criminals be improved. It also describes trading in residence permits and exploitation of foreign labour as a real problem. The counter-proposal's requirements for easier exclusion of unserious bidders, strengthened control and an information portal follow from these commitments.
Original (Swedish)
Planen pekar ut brister i offentliga upphandlingar och kräver att fusk och system som lockar till fusk och korruption motverkas, samt att myndigheternas samverkan och verktyg för att upptäcka kriminella förbättras. Den beskriver också handel med uppehållstillstånd och utnyttjande av utländsk arbetskraft som ett reellt problem. Motförslagets krav på lättare uteslutning av oseriösa anbudsgivare, stärkt kontroll och en informationsportal följer av dessa åtaganden.
- counteract fraud and corruptiondecisive»Både fusk och sådana system som tenderar att locka till fusk och korruption ska motverkas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Both fraud and such systems that tend to encourage fraud and corruption shall be counteracted.”
- authority cooperation against crime»Rättsväsendets samverkan mellan myndigheter och verktyg för att upptäcka och lagföra kriminella ska förbättras.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The judicial system's cooperation between authorities and tools to detect and prosecute criminals shall be improved.”
- shortcomings in procurement»Den offentliga sektorn har dels problem med upphandlingar, ekonomistyrning och uppföljning« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The public sector has partly problems with procurement, financial management and follow-up.”
- stop exploitation of labour»Korruption, fusk och handel med både uppehållstillstånd och människor är vanligt förekommande.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Corruption, fraud and trading in both residence permits and people are common.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2023/24:FiU34)
- Committee report full text (HB01FiU34)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2023/24:1085 — Stärkt kvinno- och tjejjour av Azra Muranovic m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2023/24:1111 — Offentlig upphandling av Boriana Åberg (M)
- Motion 2023/24:1304 — Krav på kollektivavtal vid offentlig upphandling av Jamal El-Haj m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2023/24:1314 — Oseriösa aktörer i offentlig upphandling av Hanna Westerén och Peder Björk (båda S)
- Motion 2023/24:1336 — Lagen om offentlig upphandling (LOU) av Denis Begic (S)
- Motion 2023/24:1519 — En grön klimathandlingsplan för Sverige av Elin Söderberg m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2023/24:1540 — Yrkeslärlingar vid offentlig upphandling av byggentreprenader av Kenneth G Forslund m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2023/24:1574 — Klimatpolitiken, rättvis omställning och hållbar offentlig upphandling av Mattias Vepsä och Jytte Guteland (båda S)
- Motion 2023/24:1640 — Upphandling och offentliga inköp under EU:s tröskelvärde av Niels Paarup-Petersen (C)
- Motion 2023/24:1944 — Kollektivavtal vid offentlig upphandling av Aylin Nouri m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2023/24:2060 — Offentlig upphandling och krav på kollektivavtal av Kristoffer Lindberg m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2023/24:2195 — Översyn av lagen om offentlig upphandling av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2023/24:2196 — Offentlig upphandling av Ann-Charlotte Hammar Johnsson och Malin Höglund (båda M)
- Motion 2023/24:2319 — Hyresrätt och allmännytta av Malcolm Momodou Jallow m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2023/24:2453 — Ledarskap för klimat och grön omställning av Rickard Nordin m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2023/24:2493 — Tillgänglig, proaktiv och personcentrerad vård och omsorg i hela landet av Christofer Bergenblock m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2023/24:2617 — Utgiftsområde 9 Hälsovård, sjukvård och social omsorg av Fredrik Lundh Sammeli m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2023/24:2637 — Bostadspolitik av Jennie Nilsson m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2023/24:2647 — Offentlig upphandling av Mikael Damberg m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2023/24:378 — Livsmedel av Staffan Eklöf m.fl. (SD)
Source: The Swedish Parliament