2025-03-272024/25:NU18 · p.6NUBusiness & energy
Mining of uranium, oil, coal and gas
Future regulation of uranium mining and oil-shale extraction
What's at stake: The decision affects whether a ban on uranium mining and oil-shale extraction is fixed permanently in law, with consequences for the environment and local communities where such mining could otherwise take place, or whether the question stays open pending forthcoming legislation and evidence on Sweden's access to energy resources in a crisis or heightened state of alert.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether parliament should now permanently ban uranium mining and the mining of or extraction from oil shale, or whether this should wait for the ongoing legislative work and inquiries on uranium extraction, oil shale, and domestic energy resources.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee rejects the motions calling for a permanent ban on uranium mining and oil-shale extraction. It points to a legislative proposal on uranium extraction being drafted within the Government Offices that should not be pre-empted, to existing restrictions on oil-shale extraction that should be allowed to operate for a while before parliament takes further action, and to an inquiry into industry supply security that is expected to provide important knowledge about access to coal, oil and natural gas.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 19 (MP)
The reservation (MP) calls on parliament to declare to the government that uranium mining should be permanently banned and that a national ban on mining or extracting from oil shale should be introduced. The reasoning is that uranium mining causes serious environmental problems through radioactive emissions and mine waste, that oil-shale mining always damages nature and communities, and that today's suitability-assessment requirement is not considered sufficient protection against this damage.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 19 by MP.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
What each plan points to — and how the party voted
For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| Plan | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | No 0/20/0/4 | follows the plan | confidence: high | not addressed |
| S | No | Yes 93/0/0/13 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| MP | No | No 0/14/0/4 | follows the plan | confidence: high | explicit |
| C | Yes | Abstain 1/0/17/6 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| L | Yes | Yes 13/0/0/3 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| KD | Yes | Yes 15/0/0/4 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| M | Yes | Yes 59/0/0/9 | follows the plan | confidence: high | not addressed |
| SD | Yes | Abstain 0/0/59/13 | departs from the plan | confidence: high | not addressed |
Broke with the party line
| CAnna Lasses (C, Stockholms län) | Yes — party line: Abstain |
MPs whose vote differs from their party's majority position in this division. Marked with a dark ring in the chamber view.
Committee proposal
Parliament rejects the motions 2024/25:811 by Linus Lakso et al. (MP), 2024/25:1329 by Elin Söderberg et al. (MP) motions 9 and 10, 2024/25:1457 by Tobias Andersson et al. (SD) motion 19 and 2024/25:3169 by Rickard Nordin et al. (C) motion 114.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2024/25:811 av Linus Lakso m.fl. (MP), 2024/25:1329 av Elin Söderberg m.fl. (MP) yrkandena 9 och 10, 2024/25:1457 av Tobias Andersson m.fl. (SD) yrkande 19 och 2024/25:3169 av Rickard Nordin m.fl. (C) yrkande 114.
Riksdag decision: Parliament rejected 43 proposals in motions on mineral policy, among other things with reference to that work is ongoing in several matters, including developing a new national mineral strategy. The proposals were submitted during the regular motion period 2024 and concern among other things general questions about mining and mineral industry, permit processes, critical metals and minerals as well as mining of coal, oil, natural gas and uranium.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants Sweden to develop a strategy for sustainable mineral and metal supply with focus on circularity, resource efficiency, and globally sustainable mining. (MP) — Reservation 19
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan rejects plans for expanded nuclear power and wants to take Sweden out of both fossil fuel dependence and nuclear power dependence with an energy policy based on renewable electricity.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan rejects plans for expanded nuclear power and wants to take Sweden out of both fossil fuel dependence and nuclear power dependence with an energy policy based on renewable electricity. Then there is no reason in the plan to extract uranium, and the plan requires that extraction is carried out with a long-term holistic perspective that takes into account local natural values, which supports a ban against extraction in alum shale. The bans are not explicitly mentioned, so the position is derived.
Original (Swedish)
Planen avvisar planerna på utbyggd kärnkraft och vill ta Sverige ur både fossilberoendet och kärnkraftsberoendet med en energipolitik byggd på förnybar el. Då finns inget planenligt skäl att bryta uran, och planen kräver att utvinning drivs med ett långsiktigt helhetsperspektiv som väger in lokala naturvärden, vilket talar för förbud även mot brytning i alunskiffer. Förbuden nämns inte uttryckligen, varför ställningstagandet härleds.
- no nuclear power expansiondecisive»planerna på att bygga ut kärnkraften som en väg ut ur fossilberoendet.« (party programme ↗)“plans to expand nuclear power as a way out of fossil fuel dependence.”
- out of nuclear power dependence»beroendet och kärnkraftsberoendet.« (party programme ↗)“dependence and nuclear power dependence.”
- renewable energy strategy»strategi som bygger på förnybar el och låga klimatutsläpp.« (party programme ↗)“strategy based on renewable electricity and low greenhouse gas emissions.”
- holistic view of mining»ett långsiktigt helhetsperspektiv som ser till såväl de globala behoven« (party programme ↗)“a long-term holistic perspective that considers both global needs”
The party programme's requirement is that all environmental impact in the form of emissions and waste products must be minimized, that environmental consideration is built in from the start and that the energy system is transformed to renewable.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme's requirement is that all environmental impact in the form of emissions and waste products must be minimized, that environmental consideration is built in from the start and that the energy system is transformed to renewable. A permanent ban on uranium mining and on extraction from alum shale, which entails radioactive mine waste and damage to nature and communities, can be derived from this. At the same time, the election manifesto states that there are no sacred cows in the energy question, which makes the assessment uncertain.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammets krav är att all miljöpåverkan i form av utsläpp och avfallsprodukter ska minimeras, att miljöhänsynen byggs in från början och att energisystemet ställs om till förnybart. Ett permanent förbud mot uranbrytning och mot utvinning ur alunskiffer, som medför radioaktivt gruvavfall och skador på natur och samhällen, kan härledas ur detta. Samtidigt säger valmanifestet att det inte finns några heliga kor i energifrågan, vilket gör bedömningen osäker.
- minimize emissions and wastedecisive»miljöpåverkan i form av utsläpp och avfallsprodukter ska minimeras.« (party programme ↗)“environmental impact in the form of emissions and waste products must be minimized.”
- renewable replaces fossil and nuclear»Vårt energisystem måste ställas om. Miljövänlig och förnybar energi måste ersätta såväl de« (party programme ↗)“Our energy system must be transformed. Environmentally friendly and renewable energy must replace both the”
- environmental consideration in production»Hänsynen till miljöns krav ska byggas in i produktionsprocesserna redan från början.« (party programme ↗)“Environmental consideration must be built into production processes from the beginning.”
- openness to all energy sources»När det gäller att lösa Sveriges energibehov finns inga heliga kor.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“When it comes to solving Sweden's energy needs there are no sacred cows.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The party programme states that gas and oil drilling and uranium mining shall be prohibited in Sweden and that environmental considerations shall outweigh short-term exploitation interests.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme states that gas and oil drilling and uranium mining shall be prohibited in Sweden and that environmental considerations shall outweigh short-term exploitation interests. Mining shall be based on long-term stewardship of mineral resources. A permanent ban on uranium mining and extraction from alum shale is thereby the plan's own stance.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet slår fast att gas- och oljeborrning samt uranbrytning ska förbjudas i Sverige och att miljöhänsyn ska väga tyngre än kortsiktiga exploateringsintressen. Gruvnäringen ska bygga på långsiktig hushållning med mineraltillgångar. Ett permanent förbud mot uranbrytning och mot utvinning ur alunskiffer är därmed planens egen ståndpunkt.
- ban on uranium miningdecisive»Gas- och oljeborrning samt uranbrytning ska förbjudas i Sverige.« (party programme ↗)“Gas and oil drilling and uranium mining shall be prohibited in Sweden.”
- environmental considerations outweigh short-term interests»Miljöhänsyn ska väga tyngre än kortsiktiga exploateringsintressen.« (party programme ↗)“Environmental considerations shall outweigh short-term exploitation interests.”
- long-term mineral stewardship»Gruvnäringen i Sverige ska bygga på långsiktig hushållning med mineraltillgångar.« (party programme ↗)“Mining in Sweden shall be based on long-term stewardship of mineral resources.”
- no new fossil extraction»Internationellt vill vi verka för ett moratorium mot all nyexploatering av fossila bränslen.« (party programme ↗)“Internationally we want to work for a moratorium on all new exploitation of fossil fuels.”
The election manifesto states that Sweden for the green transition shall take advantage of its natural resources and extract more minerals and metals instead of importing from countries with larger carbon footprint, and that new jobs shall be created in extraction of the minerals the transition requires.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto states that Sweden for the green transition shall take advantage of its natural resources and extract more minerals and metals instead of importing from countries with larger carbon footprint, and that new jobs shall be created in extraction of the minerals the transition requires. A national prohibition on extraction from alum shale conflicts with that. That the party programme's vision is a society without nuclear power speaks instead for the uranium ban, which makes the assessment divided.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet slår fast att Sverige för den gröna omställningen ska ta vara på sina naturresurser och utvinna mer mineral och metaller i stället för att importera från länder med större klimatavtryck, och att nya jobb ska skapas i utvinningen av de mineral omställningen kräver. Ett nationellt förbud mot brytning ur alunskiffer strider mot det. Att partiprogrammets vision är ett samhälle utan kärnkraft talar däremot för uranförbudet, vilket gör bedömningen delad.
- extract more minerals in Swedendecisive»För att klara den gröna omställningen måste vi ta vara på Sveriges naturresurser. Det är bättre att Sverige tar ansvar och utvinner mer mineral och metaller istället för att fortsätta importera dem från länder med större klimatavtryck och sämre arbetsvillkor.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“To achieve the green transition, we must take advantage of Sweden's natural resources. It is better that Sweden takes responsibility and extracts more minerals and metals instead of continuing to import them from countries with larger carbon footprint and worse working conditions.”
- mining jobs for the transition»Med rätt reformer kommer nya jobb att skapas på landsbygden inom allt från produktion av biobränslen till utvinning av de mineral och metaller som krävs för den gröna omställningen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“With the right reforms, new jobs will be created in the countryside from everything from production of biofuels to extraction of the minerals and metals required for the green transition.”
- vision without nuclear power»där Centerpartiets vision är ett samhälle utan kärnkraft« (party programme ↗)“where the Centre Party's vision is a society without nuclear power”
- protect water and environment»Rädda Sveriges sjöar, vattendrag och hav.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Save Sweden's lakes, watercourses and seas.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan establishes that nuclear power is needed for climate reasons and wishes to enable more new reactors, and that the state to the extent possible shall be neutral between energy sources that meet clear environmental and safety requirements.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that nuclear power is needed for climate reasons and wishes to enable more new reactors, and that the state to the extent possible shall be neutral between energy sources that meet clear environmental and safety requirements. A permanent ban on uranium mining and a national oil shale ban replace such requirements with total bans and are therefore rejected. The plan instead meets the risks with research and tightened requirements on operation and waste management.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att kärnkraften behövs för klimatets skull och vill möjliggöra fler nya reaktorer, samt att staten så långt möjligt ska vara neutral mellan energislag som uppfyller tydliga miljö- och säkerhetskrav. Ett permanent förbud mot uranbrytning och ett nationellt alunskifferförbud ersätter sådana krav med totalförbud och avvisas därför. Planen möter riskerna i stället med forskning och skärpta krav på drift och avfallshantering.
- nuclear power for climatedecisive»Kärnkraften behövs för klimatets skull och för att minska världens utsläpp.« (party programme ↗)“Nuclear power is needed for climate reasons and to reduce the world's emissions.”
- requirements instead of bans»För alla energislag ska finnas tydliga miljö- och säkerhetskrav.« (party programme ↗)“Clear environmental and safety requirements shall exist for all energy sources.”
- expanded nuclear power»möjliggöra fler nya reaktorer på fler ställen« (2022 manifesto ↗)“enable more new reactors in more places”
- research reduces risks»utveckling behövs för att minimera riskerna vid drift samt hantering av bränsle och avfall.« (party programme ↗)“development is needed to minimize risks in operation and handling of fuel and waste.”
The election manifesto invests in nuclear power with long-term conditions and expansion with new reactors, and the party programme explicitly distances itself from a view of nature in which humans are not allowed to intervene in or manage nature.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto invests in nuclear power with long-term conditions and expansion with new reactors, and the party programme explicitly distances itself from a view of nature in which humans are not allowed to intervene in or manage nature. Stewardship is active but cautious, with the precautionary principle as framework. Permanent national bans on uranium mining and all extraction from oil shale go further than the plan's cautious use.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet satsar på kärnkraften med långsiktiga villkor och utbyggnad med nya reaktorer, och partiprogrammet tar uttryckligen avstånd från en natursyn där människan inte tillåts ingripa i eller förvalta naturen. Förvaltarskapet är aktivt men varsamt, med försiktighetsprincipen som ram. Permanenta nationella förbud mot uranbrytning och all utvinning ur alunskiffer går längre än planens varsamma bruk.
- expanded nuclear powerdecisive»Satsa på kärnkraften med långsiktiga villkor att utvecklas. Förläng befintliga reaktorers drift och bygg ut med nya reaktorer.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Invest in nuclear power with long-term conditions to develop. Extend existing reactors' operation and build out with new reactors.”
- distance from ecocentrism»tillåts ingripa i naturen eller förvalta den« (party programme ↗)“allowed to intervene in nature or manage it”
- active but cautious stewardship»Människan kan därför ingripa och påverka naturen, men ska göra det på ett sätt som är långsiktigt hållbart och varsamt.« (party programme ↗)“Humans can therefore intervene and influence nature, but shall do so in a way that is long-term sustainable and cautious.”
- the precautionary principle»att agerandet grundas på försiktighetsprincipen« (party programme ↗)“action is grounded in the precautionary principle”
The plan establishes that Sweden's rich mineral resources shall be able to be extracted responsibly and long-term sustainably, and its energy line is to abolish bans that hinder nuclear power rather than introduce new ones.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that Sweden's rich mineral resources shall be able to be extracted responsibly and long-term sustainably, and its energy line is to abolish bans that hinder nuclear power rather than introduce new ones. Permanent bans on uranium mining and extraction from alum shale therefore go in the opposite direction. The plan also requires that science and facts, not general bans, guide environmental policy.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att Sveriges rika mineraltillgångar ska kunna utvinnas ansvarsfullt och långsiktigt hållbart, och dess energilinje är att avskaffa förbud som hindrar kärnkraften snarare än att införa nya. Permanenta förbud mot uranbrytning och utvinning ur alunskiffer går därför i motsatt riktning. Planen kräver dessutom att vetenskap och fakta, inte generella förbud, styr miljöpolitiken.
- responsible mineral extractiondecisive»Våra rika mineraltillgångar ska kunna utvinnas ansvarsfullt och långsiktigt hållbart.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Our rich mineral resources shall be able to be extracted responsibly and long-term sustainably.”
- abolish nuclear power ban»Ta bort förbudet mot att ha fler än tio kärnkraftsreaktorer i drift« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Remove the ban on having more than ten nuclear reactors in operation”
- fewer bans in energy policy»Avskaffa förbudet mot att bygga reaktorer på andra platser än vid de befintliga kärnkraftverken« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Abolish the ban on building reactors in places other than at existing nuclear power plants”
- science guides environmental policyweak support»Vetenskap och fakta ska vara ledande i klimat- och miljöpolitiken.« (party programme ↗)“Science and facts shall be guiding in climate and environmental policy.”
flags: citat_svagt
The plan wants to make it easier and faster to open mines, streamline the permitting processes for the mining industry and create conditions for new nuclear power, and explicitly criticises a policy where mines are not allowed to start.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to make it easier and faster to open mines, streamline the permitting processes for the mining industry and create conditions for new nuclear power, and explicitly criticises a policy where mines are not allowed to start. Permanent bans on uranium mining and on extraction from alum shale are the opposite of that direction. Uranium and alum shale are not mentioned explicitly, which is why the position is derived from mining and energy policy.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill göra det enklare och snabbare att öppna gruvor, effektivisera tillståndsprocesserna för gruvnäringen och skapa förutsättningar för ny kärnkraft, och kritiserar uttryckligen en politik där gruvor inte får startas. Permanenta förbud mot uranbrytning och mot utvinning ur alunskiffer är motsatsen till den inriktningen. Uran och alunskiffer nämns inte uttryckligen, varför ställningstagandet är härlett ur gruv- och energipolitiken.
- facilitate miningdecisive»Effektivisera och öka förutsägbarheten i tillståndsprocesserna för gruvnäring, elnätsutbyggnad och industri« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Streamline and increase predictability in the permitting processes for mining, grid expansion and industry.”
- easier to open mines»Det behöver också bli enklare och gå snabbare att öppna gruvor för de mineraler som behövs för exempelvis tillverkning av batterier.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It also needs to become easier and faster to open mines for the minerals needed for, for example, battery production.”
- new nuclear power»Skapa förutsättningar för ny kärnkraft i Sverige och en färdplan för byggandet av SMR-reaktorer« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Create conditions for new nuclear power in Sweden and a roadmap for building SMR reactors.”
- against shutdown policy»Regeringens strategi under två mandatperioder har strävat efter att stänga ner.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The government's strategy over two terms has aimed at shutting down.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2024/25:NU18)
- Committee report full text (HC01NU18)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2024/25:1329 — Gruvpolitik för en mer hållbar mineral- och metallförsörjning av Elin Söderberg m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2024/25:1457 — Mineralpolitik för en stark gruvnäring av Tobias Andersson m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1612 — Ranstad av Ulrika Heie (C)
- Motion 2024/25:1743 — Snabbare tillståndsprocesser med bibehållen miljöprestanda av Elin Söderberg m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2024/25:1754 — Politik för samer av Jan Riise m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2024/25:2467 — En näringspolitik för tillväxt i hela landet av Elisabeth Thand Ringqvist m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2024/25:2906 — Stärkt äganderätt i minerallagen av Sten Bergheden (M)
- Motion 2024/25:3037 — Kraftsamling för levande hav och vatten av Daniel Helldén m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2024/25:3109 — Utgiftsområde 20 Klimat, miljö och natur av Anna-Caren Sätherberg m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2024/25:3136 — Utgiftsområde 24 Näringsliv av Fredrik Olovsson m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2024/25:3169 — Ledarskap för klimat och grön omställning av Rickard Nordin m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2024/25:554 — Industri- och landsbygdspolitik av Birger Lahti m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2024/25:811 — Ett globalt nedrustningsavtal för utvinning av fossila bränslen av Linus Lakso m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2024/25:999 — Förenklande för privatpersoner att vaska guld och leta mineral av Rickard Nordin (C)
Source: The Swedish Parliament