2025-03-192024/25:FiU17 · p.7FiUEconomy & finance
Environment and climate
The government's reporting on the environmental and climate goals in the 2030 Agenda
What's at stake: The call for a more in-depth account aims to make visible whether climate and environmental policy is actually contributing to the global sustainability goals, which affects the ability to follow up on and scrutinize work on emissions, oceans, and biodiversity.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the government should provide a more transparent and thorough account of its work on the climate, ocean, and biodiversity goals within the 2030 Agenda, or whether the current reporting and ongoing work should be considered sufficient.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee sees no reason to require a more transparent and thorough account of the work on the climate, ocean, and biodiversity goals beyond what is already being done, and recommends rejecting the motion.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 9 (V, MP)
The reservation holds that climate and environmental policy under the 2030 Agenda has largely had the opposite effect to the goals set, with the Climate Policy Council and the Fiscal Policy Council criticizing the policy for increasing emissions and slowing the climate transition. It wants the government to produce an action plan with a more transparent and thorough account of work to combat climate change and protect oceans and biodiversity, including how Swedish aid contributes to the international effort.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 9 by V, MP.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
What each plan points to — and how the party voted
For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| Plan | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | No 0/21/0/3 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| S | No | Yes 93/0/0/13 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| MP | No | No 0/16/0/2 | follows the plan | confidence: high | explicit |
| C | No | Yes 20/0/0/4 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| L | No | Yes 15/0/0/1 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| KD | No | Yes 17/0/0/2 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| M | Yes | Yes 60/0/0/8 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| SD | Yes | Yes 62/0/0/10 | follows the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects motion 2024/25:3306 by Janine Alm Ericson et al. (Green Party) demands 10-12.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motion 2024/25:3306 av Janine Alm Ericson m.fl. (MP) yrkandena 10-12.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag has considered a statement from the government concerning Sweden's implementation of Agenda 2030 and the global goals for sustainable development that the UN General Assembly adopted in 2015. The Riksdag welcomes the statement and states that there are now five years left until Agenda 2030 is to be implemented. The Riksdag believes, like the government, that Sweden has good chances to achieve the goals, while at the same time there are challenges both nationally and globally. The Riksdag filed the statement in the archives, that is, concluded the case.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to strengthen political governance of Agenda 2030 work through an action plan and a political committee. (V, MP) — Reservation 9
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan requires an emissions budget that ties climate targets to concrete, quantified proposals and ambitious environmental targets that are monitored, which is the same thing as a transparent and comprehensive account of climate, ocean and biodiversity work.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires an emissions budget that ties climate targets to concrete, quantified proposals and ambitious environmental targets that are monitored, which is the same thing as a transparent and comprehensive account of climate, ocean and biodiversity work. The plan also requires increased aid and a driving Swedish role internationally. The criticism that the politics increases emissions aligns with the plan's climate perspective.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver en utsläppsbudget som knyter klimatmålen till konkreta, siffersatta förslag och ambitiösa miljömål som följs upp, vilket är samma sak som en transparent och uttömmande redovisning av klimat-, havs- och mångfaldsarbetet. Planen kräver också ökat bistånd och en pådrivande svensk roll internationellt. Kritiken mot att politiken ökar utsläppen ligger i linje med planens klimatsyn.
- emissions budget and monitoringdecisive»Vi vill att regeringen arbetar med en utsläppsbudget som knyter ihop« (party programme ↗)“We want the government to work with an emissions budget that ties together”
- monitored environmental targets»miljömål som följs upp med skarp lagstiftning och praktiskt arbete.« (party programme ↗)“environmental targets that are monitored with strict legislation and practical work.”
- stricter climate targets»Investeringar i grön teknik, industri och infrastruktur, utbyggd energikapacitet och stärkt styrning utifrån nya, skärpta klimatmål behövs.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Investments in green technology, industry and infrastructure, expanded energy capacity and strengthened governance based on new, stricter climate targets are needed.”
- increased aid»Sverige ska öka biståndet, stärka FN och skriva under kärnvapenkonventionen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden should increase aid, strengthen the UN and sign the nuclear weapons convention.”
The plan's commitment is a fixed climate policy framework, increased pace of emission reduction and protection of biological diversity, plus doubled climate aid.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's commitment is a fixed climate policy framework, increased pace of emission reduction and protection of biological diversity, plus doubled climate aid. An action plan with more transparent and exhaustive reporting on climate, marine and diversity work, including the role of aid, is a means for maintaining that ambition level. Reporting forms are not addressed in the plan, so the position is derived.
Original (Swedish)
Planens åtagande är ett fast klimatpolitiskt ramverk, en ökad takt i utsläppsminskningen och skydd av den biologiska mångfalden, samt ett dubblerat klimatbistånd. En handlingsplan med mer transparent och uttömmande redovisning av klimat-, havs- och mångfaldsarbetet, inklusive biståndets roll, är ett medel för att hålla den ambitionsnivån. Redovisningsformerna behandlas inte i planen, så ställningstagandet är härlett.
- fixed climate frameworkdecisive»Det klimatpolitiska ramverket ska ligga fast.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The climate policy framework shall remain fixed.”
- increased pace of emission reduction»Redan nu minskar utsläppen i vårt land, men takten måste öka.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Already now emissions are decreasing in our country, but the pace must increase.”
- doubled climate aid»Därför vill vi dubblera klimatbiståndet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Therefore we want to double climate aid.”
- protect biological diversity»biologiska mångfalden måste skyddas.« (party programme ↗)“biological diversity must be protected.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto requires a Swedish emissions budget that ensures climate goals are met, protection of at least 30 per cent of the world's oceans, and development aid that protects oceans and biological diversity.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto requires a Swedish emissions budget that ensures climate goals are met, protection of at least 30 per cent of the world's oceans, and development aid that protects oceans and biological diversity. The party programme wants climate goals to guide investments. The counter-proposal's requirement for an action plan with more transparent and comprehensive reporting on climate, ocean and biodiversity work, including the role of development aid, is precisely the direction the plan seeks.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet kräver en svensk utsläppsbudget som gör att klimatmålen nås, skydd av minst 30 procent av världens hav och ett bistånd som skyddar hav och biologisk mångfald. Partiprogrammet vill att klimatmålen styr investeringarna. Motförslagets krav på en handlingsplan med en mer transparent och uttömmande redovisning av klimat-, havs- och mångfaldsarbetet, inklusive biståndets roll, är just den styrning planen efterfrågar.
- emissions budget as a steering instrumentdecisive»ta fram en svensk utsläppsbudget som gör att vi når klimatmålen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“develop a Swedish emissions budget that ensures we meet climate goals.”
- development aid for oceans and biodiversity»att biståndet ska hjälpa till att bygga hållbara, klimatsmarta samhällen, skydda hav, främja biologisk mångfald och ekosystemtjänster.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“that development aid shall help build sustainable, climate-smart societies, protect oceans, promote biodiversity and ecosystem services.”
- global ocean protection»skydda minst 30 procent av världens hav.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“protect at least 30 per cent of the world's oceans.”
- climate goals guide policy»Klimatskadliga subventioner ska fasas ut och klimatmålen ska styra investeringarna i infrastruktur.« (party programme ↗)“Climate-damaging subsidies shall be phased out and climate goals shall guide investments in infrastructure.”
The election manifesto requires new climate leadership that prioritises effective measures over symbolic politics or passivity, and states that every day without action is a lost day.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto requires new climate leadership that prioritises effective measures over symbolic politics or passivity, and states that every day without action is a lost day. The party programme states that climate policy shall be based on what science shows is necessary. An action plan with open and exhaustive reporting on climate, sea and diversity work follows from this, as does the commitment to save lakes, watercourses and seas.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet kräver ett nytt klimatledarskap som prioriterar effektiva åtgärder framför symbolpolitik eller passivitet, och konstaterar att varje dag utan handling är en förlorad dag. Partiprogrammet slår fast att klimatpolitiken ska utgå från vad vetenskapen visar är nödvändigt. En handlingsplan med öppen och uttömmande redovisning av klimat-, havs- och mångfaldsarbetet följer av detta, liksom åtagandet att rädda sjöar, vattendrag och hav.
- effective measures, not passivitydecisive»Ett ledarskap som prioriterar effektiva åtgärder framför symbolpolitik eller passivitet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Leadership that prioritises effective measures over symbolic politics or passivity.”
- acute climate challenge»Klimatutmaningen är akut. Temperaturer stiger, polarisar smälter och bränder rasar. Ekosystem kollapsar, människor flyr och matförsörjningen hotas. Varje dag utan handling är en förlorad dag.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The climate challenge is acute. Temperatures rise, ice sheets melt and fires rage. Ecosystems collapse, people flee and food supplies are threatened. Every day without action is a lost day.”
- science-based climate policy»Klimatpolitiken ska utgå från vad vetenskapen visar är nödvändigt för att undvika farliga förändringar.« (party programme ↗)“Climate policy shall be based on what science shows is necessary to avoid dangerous change.”
- protect seas and water»Rädda Sveriges sjöar, vattendrag och hav.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Save Sweden's lakes, watercourses and seas.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan's key commitment is that climate policy shall be measured by how much it actually reduces emissions and not by symbolic measures, which requires precisely a transparent and exhaustive account of the results.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's key commitment is that climate policy shall be measured by how much it actually reduces emissions and not by symbolic measures, which requires precisely a transparent and exhaustive account of the results. The plan furthermore points out lack of transparency in aid as a serious problem and requires protection of the most valuable sea areas. The counter-proposal's demand for an action plan with clearer reporting is therefore in line with the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Planens avgörande åtagande är att klimatpolitiken ska mätas i hur mycket den faktiskt får ner utsläppen och inte i symbolåtgärder, vilket förutsätter just en transparent och uttömmande redovisning av resultaten. Planen pekar dessutom ut bristande öppenhet i biståndet som ett allvarligt problem och kräver skydd av de mest värdefulla havsområdena. Motförslagets krav på en handlingsplan med tydligare redovisning ligger därför i linje med planen.
- emissions impact must be measureddecisive»en klimatpolitik som inte mäts i hur många skatter som höjs eller hur mycket den kostar skattebetalarna utan i hur mycket den på riktigt får ner utsläppen« (2022 manifesto ↗)“a climate policy that is not measured by how many taxes are raised or how much it costs taxpayers but by how much it actually reduces emissions”
- transparency in aid»Samtidigt finns i dag allvarliga problem med bristande öppenhet och korruption med svenska biståndspengar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“At the same time there are serious problems today with lack of transparency and corruption with Swedish aid money.”
- protect seas and diversity»Kampen mot övergödningen ska fortsätta, industrifisket ska begränsas och de mest värdefulla havsområdena skyddas som marina reservat.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The fight against eutrophication shall continue, industrial fishing shall be limited and the most valuable sea areas protected as marine reserves.”
- raised climate ambitions»miljö- och klimatområdet måste höjas och regelverken skärpas.« (party programme ↗)“the environmental and climate area must be raised and regulations tightened.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan wants national accounts to be complemented with measures that highlight the connection between economy and environment, that environmental consideration permeates all policy areas and that action is taken against climate change and for biological diversity.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants national accounts to be complemented with measures that highlight the connection between economy and environment, that environmental consideration permeates all policy areas and that action is taken against climate change and for biological diversity. A more transparent and comprehensive reporting of climate, marine and biodiversity work responds to this requirement for visibility, but the plan mentions no action plan and describes climate transition as functioning, so support is weak.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill att nationalräkenskaperna kompletteras med mått som synliggör sambandet mellan ekonomi och miljö, att miljöhänsyn genomsyrar alla politikområden och att krafttag tas mot klimatförändringen och för biologisk mångfald. En mer transparent och uttömmande redovisning av klimat-, havs- och mångfaldsarbetet svarar mot detta krav på synlighet, men planen nämner ingen handlingsplan och beskriver klimatomställningen som fungerande, varför stödet är svagt.
- report on environment and quality of lifedecisive»Nationalräkenskaperna bör utöver ekonomiska« (party programme ↗)“National accounts should, in addition to economic”
- environmental consideration in all policy areas»Miljöhänsyn behöver genomsyra alla« (party programme ↗)“Environmental consideration needs to permeate all”
- action against climate change»För att motverka klimatförändring krävs krafttag för« (party programme ↗)“In order to counteract climate change, action is required for”
- value biological diversity»Att slå vakt om den biologiska mångfalden är viktigt av« (party programme ↗)“Safeguarding biological diversity is important from”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan's climate line is net zero emissions by 2045 at the latest through electrification, new nuclear power and international efforts where every krona achieves the most emission reduction.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's climate line is net zero emissions by 2045 at the latest through electrification, new nuclear power and international efforts where every krona achieves the most emission reduction. It explicitly rejects climate policy that stops at expensive symbolic politics, and a new action plan with expanded reporting requirements is precisely such a measure rather than emission reduction. The counter-proposal's premise that the policy pursued increases emissions has no support in the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Planens klimatlinje är nettonollutsläpp senast 2045 genom elektrifiering, ny kärnkraft och internationella insatser där varje krona ger mest utsläppsminskning. Den avvisar uttryckligen klimatpolitik som stannar vid dyrbar symbolpolitik, och en ny handlingsplan med utvidgade redovisningskrav är just en sådan åtgärd snarare än utsläppsminskning. Motförslagets premiss att den förda politiken ökar utsläppen har inget stöd i planen.
- net zero emissions 2045decisive»Vi ska som land ta fullt ansvar här hemma och nå nettonollutsläpp senast år 2045.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We shall as a country take full responsibility here at home and reach net zero emissions by 2045 at the latest.”
- no symbolic politics»Klimatpolitiken får aldrig reduceras till dyrbar symbolpolitik eller snäv klimatnationalism.« (party programme ↗)“Climate policy must never be reduced to expensive symbolic politics or narrow climate nationalism.”
- cost-effective climate efforts»Samtidigt är kostnaden för att minska utsläppen genom internationella klimatinsatser ofta mycket lägre än för att minska utsläppen i Sverige – därför kommer Moderaterna också att rikta om biståndet för att minska utsläppen i andra länder.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“At the same time, the cost of reducing emissions through international climate efforts is often much lower than reducing emissions in Sweden – therefore the Moderates will also redirect aid to reduce emissions in other countries.”
- climate aid before reporting»Öka klimatbiståndets andel av det totala biståndet för att minska utsläppen utomlands« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Increase climate aid's share of total aid to reduce emissions abroad”
The plan's climate line is that policy should be effective and have a global perspective and that costs for climate measures and aid should decrease, while at the same time rejecting costly poster politics with new regulations and reporting requirements.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's climate line is that policy should be effective and have a global perspective and that costs for climate measures and aid should decrease, while at the same time rejecting costly poster politics with new regulations and reporting requirements. An action plan with expanded reporting on climate, sea and diversity work appears in the plan's light as further administration rather than real effect. The plan's general requirement for clear results for every public investment pulls partly in the opposite direction, however, which makes the conclusion uncertain.
Original (Swedish)
Planens klimatlinje är att politiken ska vara effektiv och ha ett globalt perspektiv och att kostnaderna för klimatåtgärder och bistånd ska minska, samtidigt som den avvisar en kostsam plakatpolitik med nya regelverk och redovisningskrav. En handlingsplan med utökad redovisning av klimat-, havs- och mångfaldsarbetet framstår i planens ljus som ytterligare administration snarare än verklig effekt. Planens allmänna krav på tydliga resultat för varje offentlig satsning drar dock delvis i motsatt riktning, vilket gör slutsatsen osäker.
- effective climate policydecisive»Bedriva en effektiv klimatpolitik med ett tydligt globalt perspektiv« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Conduct effective climate policy with a clear global perspective”
- against climate poster politics»kostsam plakatpolitik där det är viktigare att spendera mycket skattemedel, införa nya skatter och införa överdimensionerade regelverk än att göra skillnad på riktigt« (2022 manifesto ↗)“costly poster politics where it is more important to spend large tax revenues, introduce new taxes and introduce oversized regulations than to make real difference”
- lower climate and aid costs»Minska kostnaderna för migrationspolitik, bistånd, EU-bidrag och klimatåtgärder som kan göras mer effektiva« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Reduce costs for migration policy, aid, EU subsidies and climate measures that can be made more efficient”
- result requirements for investments»Begära tydliga resultat för varje offentlig satsning« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Demand clear results for every public investment”
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2024/25:FiU17)
- Committee report full text (HC01FiU17)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2024/25:3299 — med anledning av skr. 2024/25:66 Sveriges genomförande av Agenda 2030 av Ida Gabrielsson m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2024/25:3300 — med anledning av skr. 2024/25:66 Sveriges genomförande av Agenda 2030 av Mikael Damberg m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2024/25:3306 — med anledning av skr. 2024/25:66 Sveriges genomförande av Agenda 2030 av Janine Alm Ericson m.fl. (MP)
- Regeringens skrivelse 2024/25:66 — Sveriges genomförande av Agenda 2030
Source: The Swedish Parliament