2026-03-042025/26:KrU5 · p.13KrUCulture
Operational frameworks for public service companies
Operating frameworks and funding for public-service broadcasting (SR/SVT)
What's at stake: The outcome affects whether public service gets extra resources for security and preparedness amid a worsening security situation, whether it can keep broadcasting major sports events, and how well funding keeps pace with rising costs as commercial players leave the terrestrial network.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The vote is about whether parliament should now call on the government to change the frameworks or funding for the public-service companies - including in light of the security situation and sports broadcasts - or whether the government's already-set frameworks should stand unchanged.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee considers the government's proposal on frameworks, content offering, and preparedness to be well balanced, and that any extra costs can be handled through separate funding decisions, and therefore rejects the motions.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 16 (S)
A worsened security situation - with attacks on SVT and rising influence operations and disinformation - together with rising costs for sports rights and the phase-out of the terrestrial network, calls for funding that gives public service real capacity to strengthen security, broadcast major sports events, and be visible on external platforms.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 16 by S.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
What each plan points to — and how the party voted
For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| Plan | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Yes 19/0/0/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| S | No | No 0/93/0/13 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| MP | No | Abstain 0/0/15/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| C | No | Abstain 1/0/20/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| L | No | Yes 14/0/0/2 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| KD | No | Yes 16/0/0/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| M | Yes | Yes 60/0/0/8 | follows the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| SD | No | Yes 61/0/0/10 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
Broke with the party line
| CMadeleine Atlas (C, Skåne läns västra) | Yes — party line: Abstain |
MPs whose vote differs from their party's majority position in this division. Marked with a dark ring in the chamber view.
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2025/26:797 by Elsa Widding (-), 2025/26:2866 by Jan Ericson and Lars Beckman (both M), 2025/26:2893 by Lars Beckman (M), 2025/26:3183 by Catarina Deremar et al. (C) demand 21, 2025/26:3459 by Björn Wiechel et al. (S) demands 66 and 67, and 2025/26:3775 by Amanda Lind et al. (MP) demands 79 and 80.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2025/26:797 av Elsa Widding (-), 2025/26:2866 av Jan Ericson och Lars Beckman (båda M), 2025/26:2893 av Lars Beckman (M), 2025/26:3183 av Catarina Deremar m.fl. (C) yrkande 21, 2025/26:3459 av Björn Wiechel m.fl. (S) yrkandena 66 och 67 samt 2025/26:3775 av Amanda Lind m.fl. (MP) yrkandena 79 och 80.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag rejected 84 proposals in motions on access to culture from the general motion period 2025. The proposals concern, among other things, culture throughout the country, expanded financing of the cultural sector, public service, and children's right to culture. The Riksdag primarily refers to the fact that work is already underway in the areas covered by the proposals.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants the state to ensure that all children in Sweden have access to museums and cultural heritage regardless of socioeconomic background and place of residence. (S) — Reservation 16
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan wants to see a strong, broad, and independent role for public service with comprehensive coverage at national, regional, and local levels, and establishes that this work needs good resources to function.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to see a strong, broad, and independent role for public service with comprehensive coverage at national, regional, and local levels, and establishes that this work needs good resources to function. Financing that provides real opportunities to strengthen quality and maintain a broad offering follows from that commitment. The election manifesto also highlights public service's independent position as something that particularly needs to be invested in.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill se en stark, bred och självständig roll för public service med heltäckande bevakning på nationell, regional och lokal nivå, och slår fast att det arbetet behöver goda resurser för att fungera. En finansiering som ger reella möjligheter att stärka säkerheten och behålla ett brett utbud följer av det åtagandet. Valplattformen lyfter också public services oberoende ställning som något som särskilt behöver satsas på.
- strong independent public servicedecisive»Vi vill se en stark, bred och självständig roll för« (party programme ↗)“We want to see a strong, broad and independent role for”
- comprehensive coverage»bevakning på nationell, regional och lokal nivå.« (party programme ↗)“coverage at national, regional and local level.”
- invest in public service»Därför är det särskilt viktigt att satsa på och utveckla folkbiblioteken, folkbildningen och public services oberoende ställning.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Therefore it is particularly important to invest in and develop public libraries, public education and public service's independent position.”
- free culture and democracy»En fri kultur är avgörande för en stark demokrati.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“A free culture is crucial for a strong democracy.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan wants to constitutionally protect a broad, independent and jointly financed public service, which presupposes financing that meets the mandate.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to constitutionally protect a broad, independent and jointly financed public service, which presupposes financing that meets the mandate. The commitment to strengthen the ability to withstand cyberattacks and disinformation carries the requirement for resources to protect broadcasting operations in a deteriorated security situation. However, the plan does not take a position on individual cost items such as sports rights.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill grundlagsskydda en bred, oberoende och gemensamt finansierad public service, vilket förutsätter en finansiering som klarar uppdraget. Åtagandet att stärka förmågan att stå emot cyberattacker och desinformation bär kravet på medel för att skydda sändningsverksamheten i ett försämrat säkerhetsläge. Planen tar dock inte ställning till enskilda kostnadsposter som sporträttigheter.
- jointly financed public servicedecisive»Bred, oberoende och grundlagsskyddad public service som är gemensamt finansierad.« (party programme ↗)“Broad, independent and constitutionally protected public service that is jointly financed.”
- constitutionally protected public service»Vi vill grundlagsskydda public service.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to constitutionally protect public service.”
- defence against cyberattacks»Arbetet för att stärka förmågan att stå emot cyberattacker och desinformation ska stärkas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Work to strengthen the ability to withstand cyberattacks and disinformation shall be strengthened.”
- counter disinformation»Åtgärder mot desinformation, hatpropaganda och hot.« (party programme ↗)“Measures against disinformation, hate speech and threats.”
The plan stands guard for broad and independent public service and sees free media as a prerequisite for democracy, which presupposes financing that is sufficient for the mission.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan stands guard for broad and independent public service and sees free media as a prerequisite for democracy, which presupposes financing that is sufficient for the mission. It also requires that society ensures that communication works in crisis situations, which is precisely the protection of broadcasting that the counter-proposal calls for. The deteriorated security situation makes the preparedness part more urgent than the plan foresaw.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår vakt om ett brett och oberoende public service och ser fria medier som en förutsättning för demokratin, vilket förutsätter en finansiering som räcker till uppdraget. Den kräver också att samhället säkrar att kommunikation fungerar i krissituationer, vilket är just det skydd av sändningsverksamheten motförslaget efterlyser. Det försämrade säkerhetsläget gör beredskapsdelen mer akut än planen förutsåg.
- broad and independent public servicedecisive»Miljöpartiet slår vakt om ett brett och oberoende public service och en mångfald av kommersiella medier, för att garantera en mångfald av åsikter.« (party programme ↗)“The Green Party stands guard for broad and independent public service and a diversity of commercial media, to guarantee a diversity of opinions.”
- protected public service»skydda ett oberoende public service i grundlagen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“protect an independent public service in the constitution.”
- communication in crisis»Samhället måste säkra kontroll över kritisk infrastruktur och att välfärd, kommunikation, vatten, energiproduktion och elnät fungerar i krissituationer.« (party programme ↗)“Society must ensure control over critical infrastructure and that welfare, communication, water, energy production and power grids function in crisis situations.”
- free media sustain democracy»Fria medier och journalister som granskar makten och informerar invånarna är en förutsättning för att demokratin ska utvecklas och frodas.« (party programme ↗)“Free media and journalists who scrutinize power and inform the inhabitants are a prerequisite for democracy to develop and flourish.”
Worldstate weighed in: Deteriorated security situation with outbreak of war between Israel/USA and Iran — Intensifies the plan's requirement that communication and broadcasting work in crisis, which strengthens support for increased crisis preparedness financing
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan establishes that an independent public service shall be defended as part of democracy's infrastructure and that protection for those active in media shall be strengthened against threats and violence.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that an independent public service shall be defended as part of democracy's infrastructure and that protection for those active in media shall be strengthened against threats and violence. A worsened security situation with attacks on broadcast operations and increased external influence makes financing sufficient for strengthened security an application of these commitments, together with the demand to strengthen society's preparedness. The plan does not however take a position on broadcast terms.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att en oberoende public service ska försvaras som en del av demokratins infrastruktur och att skyddet för dem som är verksamma i medierna ska stärkas mot hot och våld. Ett försämrat säkerhetsläge med attacker mot sändningsverksamheten och ökad påverkan utifrån gör en finansiering som räcker till stärkt säkerhet till en tillämpning av dessa åtaganden, tillsammans med kravet att rusta samhällets beredskap. Planen tar dock inte ställning till sändningsramarna.
- defend public servicedecisive»En allsidig, oberoende och livskraftig mediebevakning i hela landet är avgörande för demokratin. Pressfriheten ska skyddas och oberoende public service försvaras.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Comprehensive, independent and vital media monitoring throughout the country is crucial for democracy. Press freedom shall be protected and independent public service defended.”
- protection for media operations»Hat, hot, trakasserier och våld riktade mot demokratibärande institutioner måste upphöra. Vi ska stärka skyddet för personer verksamma bland annat i media, religiösa samfund och offentlig förvaltning.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Hate, threats, harassment and violence directed at democracy-bearing institutions must cease. We shall strengthen protection for persons active in, among other things, media, religious communities and public administration.”
- preparedness in broadcast operations»Även det civila försvaret är livsviktigt. Vi måste rusta civilförsvaret och samhällets beredskap inför krig och kris.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Civil defence too is vital. We must strengthen civil defence and society's preparedness for war and crisis.”
Worldstate weighed in: Israel's and USA's attacks on Iran and worsened security situation — strengthens the reasons to equip broadcast operations' security and preparedness
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto promises that public service companies shall continue to have a broad programme range and increased legal protection for their independence, and the party programme that financing shall safeguard the companies' independence.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto promises that public service companies shall continue to have a broad programme range and increased legal protection for their independence, and the party programme that financing shall safeguard the companies' independence. Financing that is sufficient for both security and continued broad range follows from these commitments. That broadcasting operations need to be protected against attacks also ties in with the plan's requirement for strengthened civil defence.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet lovar att public service-bolagen ska fortsätta ha ett brett programutbud och ökat lagskydd för sitt oberoende, och partiprogrammet att finansieringen ska slå vakt om bolagens oberoende. En finansiering som räcker till både säkerhet och fortsatt brett utbud följer av dessa åtaganden. Att sändningsverksamheten behöver skyddas mot attacker knyter dessutom an till planens krav på stärkt civilt försvar.
- broad public service remitdecisive»Därför ska Sveriges Television, Sveriges Radio och Utbildningsradion ha ökat skydd i lagen för sitt oberoende från politisk styrning, och public service-bolagen ska fortsätta ha ett brett programutbud.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Therefore, Sweden's Television, Sweden's Radio and Educational Radio should have increased legal protection for their independence from political control, and public service companies should continue to have a broad programme range.”
- independent financing»Finansieringen av public servicemedierna ska slå vakt om bolagens oberoende.« (party programme ↗)“Financing of public service media shall safeguard the companies' independence.”
- broad remit with quality»Public service ska fortsatt ha ett brett uppdrag och sträva efter kvalitet och relevans.« (party programme ↗)“Public service should continue to have a broad remit and strive for quality and relevance.”
- strengthened civil defence»Antalet anställda och värnpliktiga i krigsorganisationen ska öka, ny materiel tillföras och det civila försvaret stärkas i samma takt som det militära.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The number of employees and conscripts in the war organisation shall increase, new equipment shall be supplied and civil defence shall be strengthened at the same pace as military defence.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan attributes great importance to independent and ad-free channels and gives public service a broad mandate with independent news provision.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan attributes great importance to independent and ad-free channels and gives public service a broad mandate with independent news provision. It also demands that Sweden can meet cyber warfare and other influence and that civil defence has sufficient resources. A financing that provides real opportunities to strengthen the security of broadcasting operations therefore follows from the plan's commitments.
Original (Swedish)
Planen tillmäter oberoende och reklamfria kanaler stor betydelse och ger public service ett brett uppdrag med oberoende nyhetsförmedling. Den kräver också att Sverige kan möta cyberkrigföring och annan påverkan och att totalförsvaret har tillräckliga resurser. En finansiering som ger reella möjligheter att stärka säkerheten i sändningsverksamheten följer därför av planens åtaganden.
- independent public servicedecisive»Betydelsen av oberoende och reklamfria radio- och TV-kanaler utan vinstintressen är stor.« (party programme ↗)“The importance of independent and ad-free radio and TV channels without profit interests is great.”
- broad public service mandate»Public service ska tillhandahålla oberoende och saklig nyhetsförmedling liksom ett brett och« (party programme ↗)“Public service shall provide independent and factual news provision as well as broad”
- meet cyber threats and influence»Sverige måste kunna möta angrepp från internationell kriminalitet, terrorism,« (party programme ↗)“Sweden must be able to meet attacks from international crime, terrorism,”
- sufficient preparedness resources»Det samlade totalförsvaret måste ha tillräckliga resurser för att kunna garantera« (party programme ↗)“Civil defence as a whole must have sufficient resources to guarantee”
Worldstate weighed in: Israeli and US attacks against Iran and deteriorated security situation — increases the weight of the plan's requirement to meet influence and attacks on broadcasts
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The counter-proposal demands financing that gives public service real opportunities to both strengthen security and continue broadcasting major sporting events.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The counter-proposal demands financing that gives public service real opportunities to both strengthen security and continue broadcasting major sporting events. The plan's commitment is to protect and strengthen public service's core assignment and the requirement for factuality and impartiality - not to broaden the assignment and costs - and it prioritises the justice system, defence and welfare in a tight budget situation. The security part has some support through the action plan against hybrid threats, but the whole is not supported.
Original (Swedish)
Motförslaget kräver en finansiering som ger public service reella möjligheter att både stärka säkerheten och fortsätta sända stora sportevenemang. Planens åtagande är att värna och stärka public services kärnuppdrag och kravet på saklighet och opartiskhet - inte att bredda uppdraget och kostnaderna - och den prioriterar rättsväsende, försvar och välfärd i ett ansträngt budgetläge. Säkerhetsdelen har visst stöd genom handlingsplanen mot hybridhot, men helheten stöds inte.
- focus on core assignmentdecisive»Värna och stärka public services kärnuppdrag och kravet på saklighet och opartiskhet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Protect and strengthen public service's core assignment and the requirement for factuality and impartiality”
- prioritisation of core tasks»De stora behoven inom rättsväsendet, försvaret och välfärden ställer stora krav på prioriteringar under åren som kommer.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The major needs within the justice system, defence and welfare place great demands on prioritisations in the years to come.”
- risk with public media financing»offentlig finansiering och politiska ambitioner utgör en risk« (party programme ↗)“public financing and political ambitions constitute a risk”
- protection against hybrid threats»Införa en handlingsplan med konkreta åtgärder mot hybridhot och cyberattacker« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Introduce an action plan with concrete measures against hybrid threats and cyberattacks”
The plan states that public service shall broadcast major sporting events and that it is in the national interest that such broadcasts reach the entire population, which is the essence of the counter-proposal's demands.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan states that public service shall broadcast major sporting events and that it is in the national interest that such broadcasts reach the entire population, which is the essence of the counter-proposal's demands. The plan moreover wants to strengthen society's preparedness, which speaks in favour of broadcast security being strengthened. However, the plan's desire to reduce political steering of the media sphere limits how far an expanded mandate should go.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att public service ska sända stora idrottsevenemang och att det är av nationellt intresse att sådana sändningar når hela befolkningen, vilket är kärnan i motförslagets krav. Planen vill dessutom stärka samhällets beredskap, vilket talar för att sändningssäkerheten ska kunna förstärkas. Planens vilja att minska den politiska styrningen av mediesfären begränsar däremot hur långt ett utökat uppdrag bör gå.
- public service should broadcast sportsdecisive»Att public service ska sända stora idrottsevenemang« (2022 manifesto ↗)“That public service shall broadcast major sporting events”
- sports accessible to all»Det är av nationellt intresse att sändningar från sådana evenemang kan tillgängliggöras för hela befolkningen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It is in the national interest that broadcasts from such events can be made accessible to the entire population.”
- strengthened preparedness»Sverigedemokraterna vill stärka samhällets beredskap för alla typer av kriser som kan uppstå.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden Democrats want to strengthen society's preparedness for all types of crises that may arise.”
- reduced political steering of media»Mediernas oberoende ska öka genom minskad politisk styrning från statsmakten och åtgärder för en ökad mångfald.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Media independence should increase through reduced political steering by state power and measures for increased diversity.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2025/26:KrU5)
- Committee report full text (HD01KrU5)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2025/26:1086 — Kulturskolor och barns tillgång till kultur och musik av Anna Wallentheim (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1273 — Jämlik tillgång till kulturskola av Hanna Westerén (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1423 — En stark kultur i hela landet av Åsa Karlsson (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1425 — Musikers och kulturarbetares situation i trygghetssystemet av Mirja Räihä och Per-Arne Håkansson (båda S)
- Motion 2025/26:1520 — Utvärdering och förtydligande av religionsfrihetens gränser för att motverka normkollisioner och värna det öppna samhället av Emma Ahlström Köster (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1568 — Tillgänglighet av nordiska public service-medier i hela Norden av Heléne Björklund m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1598 — Ett starkare kulturliv i Västsverige av Jessica Rodén m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1618 — Politik för sverigefinnar av Jan Riise m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2025/26:1692 — Semester på landet en möjlighet för alla av Staffan Eklöf (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:1803 — Långsiktigt stöd till Amatörteaterns riksförbund (ATR) av Lena Johansson (S)
- Motion 2025/26:190 — En kulturell allemansrätt för barn och unga av Mats Berglund m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2025/26:2454 — Värnande av kulturen i hela landet av Linus Sköld m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:2743 — Nationell strategi för ungas mötesplatser och fritidsgårdar av Mats Wiking (S)
- Motion 2025/26:2778 — En funktionsrättspolitik för trygghet och delaktighet av Nadja Awad m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2025/26:2819 — Vissa kulturpolitiska frågor av Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2025/26:2866 — Omfattningen av public service av Jan Ericson och Lars Beckman (båda M)
- Motion 2025/26:2893 — Snedvriden konkurrens mellan olika medier av Lars Beckman (M)
- Motion 2025/26:30 — Föräldralås på barnens appar av Josef Fransson (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:3183 — Kultur, civilsamhälle och medier av Catarina Deremar m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2025/26:3366 — Kulturljudzoner och bättre villkor för livekulturen av Mats Berglund m.fl. (MP)
Source: The Swedish Parliament