2025-02-262024/25:JuU22 · p.4JuUJustice
Calculation of the statute of limitations for young offenders
Calculating the limitation period for young offenders
What's at stake: How the limitation period is calculated affects how long young people suspected of crimes can face prosecution, and critics argue that an arrangement without special regard to age could hit this group harder than adult offenders.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether a special rule is needed for calculating the limitation period for young offenders, beyond the new arrangement that is based solely on an offense's maximum penalty.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee rejects the motion calling for a special rule on how the limitation period should be calculated for young offenders, and considers that the new arrangement - under which the limitation period is set based on an offense's maximum penalty - should apply without such an exception.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 3 (V)
The reservation (V) supports the new arrangement of basing the limitation period on an offense's maximum penalty, but considers it risks hitting young offenders disproportionately hard and that the analysis of the effect on this group is insufficient, and therefore wants the government to come back with a special proposal on how the limitation period should be calculated for young offenders.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 3 by V.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
What each plan points to — and how the party voted
For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| Plan | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | No 0/19/0/5 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| S | No | Yes 91/2/0/13 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| MP | No | Yes 15/0/0/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| C | No | Yes 21/0/0/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| L | Yes | Yes 12/0/0/4 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| KD | No | Yes 15/0/0/4 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | derived |
| M | Yes | Yes 60/0/0/8 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| SD | Yes | Yes 63/0/0/9 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
Broke with the party line
| SAlexandra Völker (S, Stockholms län) | No — party line: Yes |
| SSofia Amloh (S, Södermanlands län) | No — party line: Yes |
MPs whose vote differs from their party's majority position in this division. Marked with a dark ring in the chamber view.
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motion 2024/25:3287 by Gudrun Nordborg et al. (V) claim 2.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motion 2024/25:3287 av Gudrun Nordborg m.fl. (V) yrkande 2.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag approved the government's proposal for new criminal statutory limitations legislation. Among other things, the statutes of limitations for serious crimes shall be extended and all crimes that can result in life imprisonment shall be excluded from limitations. The new rules also mean that the statute of limitations for gross violation of personal integrity and honor-based oppression of a child shall be calculated from the day the injured party reaches or would have reached 18 years of age, and that imposed prison sentences shall not be subject to limitations. The legislative changes take effect from 1 April 2025. Most of the legislative changes also apply to crimes that have been committed but at that time had not been subject to limitations.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants the statute of limitations to remain for crimes with life imprisonment in the sentence scale. (V) — Reservation 3
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The party programme demands that sentences and penalties be carefully designed so they actually reduce crime and do not worsen problems, and that the child's best interests be weighed in every case according to the Convention on the Rights of the Child.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme demands that sentences and penalties be carefully designed so they actually reduce crime and do not worsen problems, and that the child's best interests be weighed in every case according to the Convention on the Rights of the Child. The counter-proposal's demand for a specific proposal on how the statute of limitations should be calculated for younger offenders follows directly from that commitment. The election manifesto also emphasizes that focus should be on preventing children from being drawn into criminality rather than on generally harsher rules.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet kräver att straff och påföljder är noggrant utformade så att de faktiskt sänker brottsligheten och inte förvärrar problem, och att barnets bästa ska vägas in i varje läge enligt barnkonventionen. Motförslagets krav på ett särskilt förslag om hur preskriptionstiden ska beräknas för yngre lagöverträdare följer direkt av det åtagandet. Valmanifestet betonar också att fokus ska ligga på att hindra att barn dras in i kriminalitet snarare än på generellt hårdare regler.
- carefully designed penaltiesdecisive»Straff och andra påföljder för brott behöver vara noggrant« (party programme ↗)“Sentences and other penalties for crimes need to be careful”
- child's best interests in every case»barnkonventionen och principen att i varje läge se till barnets« (party programme ↗)“the Convention on the Rights of the Child and the principle that in every case take into account the best”
- prevent recruitment of children»Vissa straff kan behöva höjas men mycket mer fokus måste riktas mot att förhindra rekryteringen av nya barn till gängkriminalitet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Certain penalties may need to be increased but much more focus must be directed toward preventing the recruitment of new children to gang crime.”
- penalties must not worsen problems»utformade för att faktiskt leda till lägre brottslighet och inte förvärra« (party programme ↗)“designed to actually lead to lower crime and not worsen”
The party programme requires that the best interests of the child be considered in all decisions and the election manifesto builds youth policy on no young person becoming criminal, with social action rather than just sharpened outcomes.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme requires that the best interests of the child be considered in all decisions and the election manifesto builds youth policy on no young person becoming criminal, with social action rather than just sharpened outcomes. The counter-proposal does not reject the new statute of limitations calculation but requests a special proposal for younger offenders, which follows from these commitments. The election manifesto's sentence increases are directed at gang-related crime and repeated serious crime, not at young people as a group.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet kräver att barnets bästa beaktas vid alla beslut och valmanifestet bygger ungdomspolitiken på att ingen ung ska bli kriminell, med sociala insatser snarare än enbart skärpta utfall. Motförslaget avvisar inte den nya preskriptionsberäkningen utan begär ett särskilt förslag för yngre lagöverträdare, vilket följer av dessa åtaganden. Valmanifestets straffskärpningar riktas mot gängbrottslighet och upprepad allvarlig brottslighet, inte mot unga som grupp.
- best interests of child in all decisionsdecisive»Alla barn ska ha rätt till en trygg uppväxt i enlighet med FN:s barnkonvention.« (party programme ↗)“Every child has the right to a safe childhood in accordance with the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child.”
- young people away from crime»Ingen ung ska bli kriminell.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“No young person shall become criminal.”
- social action for young people»Vi vill se fler och mer långtgående sociala insatser och föräldrar ska vara skyldiga att medverka när deras barn behöver socialtjänstens åtgärder.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to see more and more far-reaching social action and parents shall be obliged to participate when their child needs social services action.”
- sharpened sentences for gang crime»Vi vill skärpa straffen bland annat för gängrelaterad brottslighet, för den som begår upprepade och allvarliga brott och för den som understödjer organiserad kriminalitet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to sharpen sentences including for gang-related crime, for those who commit repeated and serious crime and for those who support organized crime.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan is based on sentences being rehabilitative and the child perspective permeating decisions through the Convention on the Rights of the Child as law and child impact assessments.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan is based on sentences being rehabilitative and the child perspective permeating decisions through the Convention on the Rights of the Child as law and child impact assessments. A requirement for a special proposal on how the statute of limitations should be calculated for younger offenders is precisely such an impact assessment for young people. At the same time, the plan accepts tougher measures against young people who commit serious crimes, but never discusses the statute of limitations as such.
Original (Swedish)
Planen bygger på att påföljder ska vara rehabiliterande och att barnperspektivet ska genomsyra beslut genom barnkonventionen som lag och barnkonsekvensanalyser. Ett krav på ett särskilt förslag om hur preskriptionstiden ska beräknas för yngre lagöverträdare är just en sådan konsekvensanalys för unga. Planen accepterar samtidigt skärpta insatser mot unga som begår grova brott, men talar aldrig om preskription i sig.
- rehabilitative sentencesdecisive»Brottspåföljder har både ett brottsförebyggande och ett rehabiliterande syfte.« (party programme ↗)“Sentences for crimes have both a crime prevention and a rehabilitative purpose.”
- child impact assessment of decisions»FN:s barnkonvention ska bli svensk lag och politiska beslut bör föregås av en barnkonsekvensanalys.« (party programme ↗)“The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child should become Swedish law and political decisions should be preceded by a child impact assessment.”
- humane criminal care»Kriminalvård ska vara human och ha som mål att den som dömts inte ska återfalla i kriminalitet.« (party programme ↗)“Criminal care should be humane and aim to prevent those convicted from reoffending.”
- stricter but caring youth sentence»höja maxtiden för sluten ungdomsvård och förstärka vårdinsatser och utbildning under tiden den unge är frihetsberövad« (2022 manifesto ↗)“raise the maximum duration of closed youth care and strengthen care and education while the young person is deprived of liberty”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan lacks commitments regarding statutes of limitations, but the party programme establishes that criminal policy should also encourage those who have committed crimes to a new situation and that children's rights and perspective weigh most.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan lacks commitments regarding statutes of limitations, but the party programme establishes that criminal policy should also encourage those who have committed crimes to a new situation and that children's rights and perspective weigh most. A special analysis of how longer statutes of limitations affect young offenders is close to that principle. At the same time, the election manifesto wants to toughen sentences and prevent recruitment, which makes the basis weak.
Original (Swedish)
Planen saknar åtaganden om preskriptionsregler, men partiprogrammet slår fast att kriminalpolitiken också ska stimulera dem som begått brott till en ny livssituation och att barnens rättigheter och perspektiv väger tyngst. En särskild analys av hur längre preskriptionstider slår mot unga lagöverträdare ligger nära den principen. Samtidigt vill valmanifestet skärpa straffen och förebygga nyrekrytering, vilket gör underlaget svagt.
- rehabilitation of offendersdecisive»Kriminalpolitiken ska därför både förebygga och avskräcka från brott, stödja brottsdrabbade och stimulera dem som har begått olagliga handlingar till en ny livssituation utan brottslighet.« (party programme ↗)“Criminal policy shall therefore both prevent and deter from crime, support crime victims and encourage those who have committed illegal acts to a new situation without crime.”
- child perspective in decisions»Samhällets aktörer ska inta individens perspektiv. Av största betydelse är då barnens rättigheter och perspektiv.« (party programme ↗)“Society's actors shall take the individual's perspective. Of paramount importance is children's rights and perspective.”
- every child's rights»Särskilt viktigt är att värna varje barns rätt att bli respekterad och att bli sedd för den man är.« (party programme ↗)“It is particularly important to protect every child's right to be respected and to be seen for who they are.”
- stricter sentences against gang crime»För att besegra dem krävs bättre insatser som förebygger nyrekrytering, mer resurser till polis, åklagare, domstolar och kriminalvården och strängare straff.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“To defeat them requires better measures that prevent recruitment, more resources for police, prosecutors, courts and prisons and stricter sentences.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan's line toward young offenders is tightening, not leniency: the multiple offender discount shall be abolished, the maximum duration of closed youth care is extended and crimes by suspects under 15 as a main rule are investigated by police.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's line toward young offenders is tightening, not leniency: the multiple offender discount shall be abolished, the maximum duration of closed youth care is extended and crimes by suspects under 15 as a main rule are investigated by police. A special regulation that reduces the statute of limitations precisely for younger offenders goes in the opposite direction to this commitment. The plan therefore speaks against the counter-proposal's demand.
Original (Swedish)
Planens linje mot unga lagöverträdare är skärpning, inte lindring: mängdrabatten ska avskaffas, den maximala vårdtiden för sluten ungdomsvård förlängas och brott av misstänkta under 15 år som huvudregel utredas av polis. En särreglering som mildrar preskriptionstiden just för yngre lagöverträdare går i motsatt riktning mot detta åtagande. Planen talar därför mot motförslagets krav.
- increased sentences, no discountdecisive»Vi vill avskaffa dagens mängdrabatt på brott, slopa den närmast automatiska frigivningen från fängelsestraff och skärpa straffen för bland annat vapenbrott, våldtäkt och utpressning.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to abolish today's multiple offender discount, eliminate the nearly automatic release from prison sentences and increase sentences for, among other things, weapons crimes, rape and extortion.”
- stricter penalties for young people»Den maximala vårdtiden för sluten ungdomsvård ska förlängas, så att unga mördare som i dag inte ska kunna släppas fria efter fyra år.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The maximum duration of closed youth care shall be extended, so that young murderers who today must not be released free after four years.”
- young crimes shall be investigated»Huvudregeln ska vara att alla brott som anmäls till polis och där den misstänkte är under 15 år ska utredas av polis.« (party programme ↗)“The main rule shall be that all crimes reported to police where the suspect is under 15 shall be investigated by police.”
- stricter sentences upon reoffending»Påföljdssystemet ska förändras så att återfall och upprepad brottslighet ger strängare straff, liksom medverkan i organiserad brottslighet.« (party programme ↗)“The penalty system shall be changed so that reoffending and repeated crime incur stricter sentences, as does participation in organized crime.”
The plan does not address limitation periods, but it treats young offenders as a separate group: community service shall always be considered first for young people, authorities shall react particularly quickly to crimes by young people, and the sanction shall break a criminal pattern and adapt the young person to a meaningful life.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan does not address limitation periods, but it treats young offenders as a separate group: community service shall always be considered first for young people, authorities shall react particularly quickly to crimes by young people, and the sanction shall break a criminal pattern and adapt the young person to a meaningful life. Demanding a special proposal on how the limitation period shall be calculated for younger offenders follows from that special treatment. Since the support rests on general principles, certainty is low.
Original (Swedish)
Planen behandlar inte preskriptionstider, men den håller unga lagöverträdare som en egen grupp: samhällstjänst ska alltid övervägas i första hand för ungdomar, myndigheterna ska reagera särskilt snabbt på brott av unga, och påföljden ska bryta ett brottsligt mönster och anpassa den unge till ett meningsfullt liv. Att kräva ett särskilt förslag om hur preskriptionstiden ska beräknas för yngre lagöverträdare följer av den särbehandlingen. Eftersom stödet vilar på allmänna principer är säkerheten låg.
- young people are specially treated in the sanction systemdecisive»Samhällstjänst ska alltid övervägas i första hand« (party programme ↗)“Community service shall always be considered first”
- rapid reaction to youth crime»är särskilt viktigt att myndigheterna reagerar snabbt på« (party programme ↗)“it is especially important that authorities react quickly to”
- reintegration of the young person»och anpassa denne till ett normalt och meningsfullt liv.« (party programme ↗)“and adapt him to a normal and meaningful life.”
- the sanction shall provide insight»Straffet ska vara så utformat att det ger brottslingen« (party programme ↗)“The sanction shall be designed so that it gives the perpetrator”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan's bearing line is stricter and earlier consequences for young offenders: all sentencing discounts for those who have turned 18 should be removed, the age of criminal responsibility should be investigated and youth prisons established.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's bearing line is stricter and earlier consequences for young offenders: all sentencing discounts for those who have turned 18 should be removed, the age of criminal responsibility should be investigated and youth prisons established. The counter-proposal instead demands a special regulation to protect younger offenders from the effects of a statute of limitations calculated on maximum penalty. This conflicts with the plan's commitment that those who choose the path of crime should be met with early and clear consequences.
Original (Swedish)
Planens bärande linje är skärpta och tidigare konsekvenser för unga lagöverträdare: alla straffrabatter för den som fyllt 18 år ska bort, straffmyndighetsåldern ska utredas och ungdomsfängelser inrättas. Motförslaget kräver tvärtom en särreglering som ska skydda yngre lagöverträdare från effekterna av en preskriptionstid beräknad på straffmaximum. Det strider mot planens åtagande att den som väljer brottsbanan ska mötas av tidiga och tydliga konsekvenser.
- no sentencing discountsdecisive»Ta bort alla straffrabatter för den som fyllt 18 år och slopa dagens mängdrabatter« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Remove all sentencing discounts for those who have turned 18 and eliminate today's quantity discounts”
- early clear consequences»de som ändå väljer den brottsliga vägen ska mötas av tidiga och tydliga konsekvenser« (2022 manifesto ↗)“those who nevertheless choose the criminal path should be met with early and clear consequences”
- stricter accountability for youth»Utreda sänkt straffmyndighetsålder och inrätta ungdomsfängelser« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Investigate lowered age of criminal responsibility and establish youth prisons”
- personal responsibility from youth»skolan och socialtjänsten ska inskärpa den enskildes ansvar« (party programme ↗)“schools and social services shall instil personal responsibility from young years”
The election manifesto's stance towards young offenders is harder, not softer: sentence reductions for those who commit serious crimes as young people should be removed and the age of criminal responsibility should be lowered.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto's stance towards young offenders is harder, not softer: sentence reductions for those who commit serious crimes as young people should be removed and the age of criminal responsibility should be lowered. The counter-proposal, on the other hand, wants the period of limitation to be calculated specially for younger people because the new rule risks being harsh on them. The plan moreover requires that law violations be punished swiftly and consistently, which speaks against special leniency for this group.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestets linje mot unga lagöverträdare är hårdare, inte mildare: straffrabatter för den som begått en rå gärning som ung ska tas bort och straffmyndighetsåldern sänkas. Motförslaget vill tvärtom att preskriptionstiden beräknas särskilt för yngre eftersom den nya regeln riskerar att slå hårt mot dem. Planen kräver dessutom att lagöverträdelser bestraffas snabbt och konsekvent, vilket talar mot en särskild lindring för denna grupp.
- abolished youth sentence reductiondecisive»Straffrabatter för den som begått flerfaldig brottslighet eller begått en rå gärning som ung ska tas bort« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sentence reductions for those who have committed repeated crimes or committed serious crimes as young people shall be removed”
- lowered age of criminal responsibility»Sänka straffmyndighetsåldern« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Lower the age of criminal responsibility”
- swift and consistent punishment»lagöverträdelser bestraffas snabbt och konsekvent« (party programme ↗)“law violations are punished swiftly and consistently”
- harder approach early»Ge socialtjänst, skola och rättsväsende möjlighet att ingripa med tuffare tag i ett tidigt skede« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Give social services, schools and the justice system the ability to intervene with a harder approach at an early stage”
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2024/25:JuU22)
- Committee report full text (HC01JuU22)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2024/25:3111 — Utgiftsområde 4 Rättsväsendet av Teresa Carvalho m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2024/25:3164 — Rättspolitik av Ulrika Liljeberg m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2024/25:3287 — med anledning av prop. 2024/25:59 En modern straffrättslig preskriptionslagstiftning av Gudrun Nordborg m.fl. (V)
- Proposition 2024/25:59 — En modern straffrättslig preskriptionslagstiftning
Source: The Swedish Parliament