2024-05-152023/24:UU10 · p.6UUForeign affairs
The war in Gaza
Sweden's EU line on the war in Gaza
What's at stake: The decision affects how forcefully Sweden pushes within the EU for a ceasefire and war-crimes accountability in the Gaza war, and whether Sweden should pursue concrete measures against Israel such as ending the trade agreement and banning arms exports. It concerns civilians in Gaza and Israel and Sweden's foreign-policy line within the EU.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
At issue is whether parliament should direct the government to push within the EU for an immediate, permanent ceasefire in Gaza and concrete countermeasures against Israel, or leave the matter to the EU's existing coordinated foreign policy without such a specific directive.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
In its treatment of the EU's common foreign and security policy, the committee proceeds from the view that Swedish positions gain the most traction through a strong, united EU and its established instruments rather than by singling out specific unilateral measures against one state, and on that basis rejects the motion's demands on Gaza.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 11 (V, MP)
The reservation (V, MP) calls for Sweden to push within the EU for the EU to take a stand for an immediate, permanent ceasefire in Gaza and work toward ending the occupation of Palestine — including having the EU terminate its trade agreement with Israel and impose a ban on arms sales to the country — and for war crimes to be investigated with those responsible held accountable before the International Court of Justice and the International Criminal Court.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 11 by V, MP.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
What each plan points to — and how the party voted
For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| Plan | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | No 0/21/0/3 | follows the plan | confidence: high | derived |
| S | No | Yes 93/0/0/13 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| MP | No | No 0/16/0/2 | follows the plan | confidence: high | derived |
| C | Yes | Yes 19/0/0/5 | follows the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| L | Yes | Yes 14/0/0/2 | follows the plan | confidence: low | derived |
| KD | No | Yes 17/0/0/2 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | derived |
| M | Yes | Yes 60/0/0/8 | follows the plan | confidence: low | derived |
| SD | Yes | Yes 61/0/0/11 | follows the plan | confidence: high | derived |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects motion 2023/24:2836 by Håkan Svenneling et al. (V) demands 27 and 31.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motion 2023/24:2836 av Håkan Svenneling m.fl. (V) yrkandena 27 och 31.
Riksdag decision: The Government has submitted a letter concerning activities in the EU during 2023. The Riksdag directs a formal statement (tillkännagivande) to the Government in response to motion demands concerning a review of the rules for EU sanctions against terrorism. The Riksdag holds that the Government should work for the EU to update these rules so that it becomes easier to designate organisations conducting state-supported terrorism as terrorist organisations. The Government should in connection with this also work for the EU to designate the Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps as a terrorist organisation. The Riksdag places the Government's letter on file, that is to say concludes the matter, and says no to other motions.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants the EU to become a nuclear-free zone. (V, MP) — Reservation 11
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan requires a ban on arms exports to states waging wars of aggression and to regimes committing crimes against human rights, and wants crimes against international law to be noted and prosecuted.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires a ban on arms exports to states waging wars of aggression and to regimes committing crimes against human rights, and wants crimes against international law to be noted and prosecuted. Sweden should be a voice for peace and de-escalation, not militarization. The counter-proposal's demands for a ceasefire, termination of the trade agreement, an arms embargo, and prosecution of war crimes therefore align with the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver förbud mot vapenexport till stater som för angreppskrig och till regimer som begår brott mot de mänskliga rättigheterna, och vill att brott mot internationell lag uppmärksammas och prövas. Sverige ska vara en röst för fred och deeskalering, inte för militarisering. Motförslagets krav på eldupphör, uppsagt handelsavtal, vapenembargo och prövning av krigsbrott ligger därför i linje med planen.
- ban on arms exportsdecisive»förbjuda vapenexport till diktaturer, stater som för angreppskrig och« (party programme ↗)“prohibit arms exports to dictatorships, states waging wars of aggression and”
- no weapons to human rights violators»regimer som begår brott mot de mänskliga rättigheterna.« (party programme ↗)“regimes that commit crimes against human rights.”
- accountability for crimes against international law»Genom FN får även små länder en röst och starka militärmakters brott mot internationell lag kan uppmärksammas och motverkas.« (party programme ↗)“Through the UN, even small countries get a voice and powerful military powers' crimes against international law can be noted and countered.”
- voice for peace»Vänsterpartiet anser att Sverige ska vara en röst för fred och rättvisa, inte för ökad militarisering.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Left Party believes that Sweden should be a voice for peace and justice, not for increased militarization.”
The election manifesto makes international law and human rights the bearing parts of foreign policy, and the party programme establishes that organized violence against the civilian population must always be rejected and that individuals' right to life in freedom and security is defended.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto makes international law and human rights the bearing parts of foreign policy, and the party programme establishes that organized violence against the civilian population must always be rejected and that individuals' right to life in freedom and security is defended. That the EU conditions trade after human rights is also the plan's line. This supports the counter-proposal's demand, even though the plan does not mention the conflict.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet gör folkrätten och de mänskliga rättigheterna till bärande delar av utrikespolitiken, och partiprogrammet slår fast att organiserat våld mot civilbefolkningen alltid måste avvisas och att enskildas rätt till liv i frihet och säkerhet försvaras. Att EU villkorar handel efter mänskliga rättigheter är också planens linje. Det stöder motförslagets krav, även om planen inte nämner konflikten.
- violence against civilians rejecteddecisive»Varje form av terrorhandling, liksom organiserat våld riktat« (party programme ↗)“Every form of terrorist act, as well as organized violence directed”
- international law as a guiding star»Vi har en lång historia av att stå upp för folkrätten, solidaritet, nedrustning, demokrati och jämställdhet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We have a long history of standing up for international law, solidarity, disarmament, democracy and equality.”
- trade conditioned on human rights»EU behöver sluta fler handelsavtal där också våra värderingar om social dialog, mänskliga rättigheter och miljö är vägledande.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The EU needs to conclude more trade agreements where our values on social dialogue, human rights and environment are also guiding.”
- protection of civilians»människors rätt till liv i frihet och säkerhet måste alltid försvaras.« (party programme ↗)“people's right to life in freedom and security must always be defended.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan requires that exports of weapons to countries in armed conflict or where serious human rights violations occur be abolished, which directly supports the counter-proposal's demand for a weapons embargo against a conflict party.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that exports of weapons to countries in armed conflict or where serious human rights violations occur be abolished, which directly supports the counter-proposal's demand for a weapons embargo against a conflict party. The plan furthermore puts international law and human rights at the centre and wants to set strict requirements in trade policy, which supports both termination of the trade agreement and accountability for war crimes. According to the plan, peace is not only the goal but also the path to it.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att export av vapen till länder i väpnad konflikt eller där grova kränkningar av mänskliga rättigheter förekommer avskaffas, vilket direkt bär motförslagets krav på vapenembargo mot en konfliktpart. Planen sätter dessutom folkrätten och de mänskliga rättigheterna i centrum och vill ställa hårda krav i handelspolitiken, vilket stöder både uppsägning av handelsavtalet och ansvarsutkrävande för krigsbrott. Fred är enligt planen inte bara målet utan också vägen dit.
- stop to weapons exports to conflict partiesdecisive»Export av vapen och annan krigsmateriel till diktaturer, länder som befinner sig i väpnad konflikt eller där grova och omfattande kränkningar av mänskliga rättigheter förekommer ska avskaffas.« (party programme ↗)“Exports of weapons and other war material to dictatorships, countries in armed conflict or where serious and extensive human rights violations occur shall be abolished.”
- international law at the centre»Miljöpartiet de gröna sätter folkrätten och de mänskliga rättigheterna i centrum.« (party programme ↗)“The Green Party puts international law and human rights at the centre.”
- no passive Swedish position»den gemensamma utrikespolitiken får inte bli en ursäkt för en passiv svensk politik i FN:s generalförsamling.« (party programme ↗)“the common foreign policy must not become an excuse for passive Swedish policy in the UN General Assembly.”
- conditional trade policy»Vi vill införa hårda miljökrav och sociala krav i handelspolitiken som kan bidra till förbättringar långt utanför EU:s gränser.« (party programme ↗)“We want to introduce strict environmental and social requirements in trade policy that can contribute to improvements far outside the EU's borders.”
The plan does not address the conflict, but its clearest trade policy commitment is that Sweden needs more free trade and international cooperation, not protectionism, and that trade barriers shall be avoided.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan does not address the conflict, but its clearest trade policy commitment is that Sweden needs more free trade and international cooperation, not protectionism, and that trade barriers shall be avoided. The counter-proposal demands that a trade agreement be terminated and that an arms sales ban be introduced, which goes against that line. However, the plan's requirement that human freedoms and rights be protected supports the part about investigating war crimes, which is why the conclusion is uncertain.
Original (Swedish)
Planen behandlar inte konflikten, men dess tydligaste handelspolitiska åtagande är att Sverige behöver mer frihandel och internationellt samarbete, inte protektionism, och att handelshinder ska undvikas. Motförslaget kräver att ett handelsavtal sägs upp och att ett vapenförsäljningsförbud införs, vilket går emot den linjen. Planens krav på att mänskliga fri- och rättigheter ska värnas stödjer däremot delen om att krigsbrott utreds, varför slutsatsen är osäker.
- free trade before trade barriersdecisive»Sverige behöver mer frihandel och internationellt samarbete, inte protektionism och stängda gränser.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden needs more free trade and international cooperation, not protectionism and closed borders.”
- against trade barriers»Tullar och handelshinder begränsar konsumenters och producenters val.« (party programme ↗)“Tariffs and trade barriers limit consumers' and producers' choices.”
- the importance of free trade»Sverige klarar sig inte utan frihandel.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden cannot manage without free trade.”
- HR and accountability»Utrikes- och säkerhetspolitiken syftar ytterst till att värna universella mänskliga fri- och rättigheter.« (party programme ↗)“Foreign and security policy ultimately aims to protect universal human freedoms and rights.”
The counter-proposal requires, among other things, that a trade agreement be terminated and that weapons sales to a party to conflict be prohibited.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The counter-proposal requires, among other things, that a trade agreement be terminated and that weapons sales to a party to conflict be prohibited. The plan is an explicit free trade line that wants to strengthen the EU as a free trade union and work for more free trade agreements, and draws the line for weapons exports at dictatorships, which speaks against trade agreements being terminated as a foreign policy pressure tool. The requirement that war crimes be investigated does, however, have support in the plan's commitment to a stronger international criminal court.
Original (Swedish)
Motförslaget kräver bland annat att ett handelsavtal sägs upp och att vapenförsäljning till en konfliktpart förbjuds. Planen är en uttalad frihandelslinje som vill stärka EU som frihandelsunion och verka för fler frihandelsavtal, och drar gränsen för vapenexport vid diktaturer, vilket talar emot att avtal rivs upp som utrikespolitiskt påtryckningsmedel. Kravet på att krigsbrott utreds har däremot stöd i planens åtagande om en starkare internationell brottmålsdomstol.
- strong voice for free tradedecisive»Sverige ska vara en stark röst för frihandel, i första hand genom globala avtal men annars genom regionala överenskommelser.« (party programme ↗)“Sweden should be a strong voice for free trade, primarily through global agreements but otherwise through regional arrangements.”
- more free trade agreements»Vi ska stärka EU som frihandelsunion med en fördjupad inre marknad, värna den fria rörligheten i Europa och verka för fler frihandelsavtal med omvärlden.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We should strengthen the EU as a free trade union with a deepened internal market, protect free movement in Europe, and work for more free trade agreements with the rest of the world.”
- limit of weapons exports»Sverige ska inte exportera vapen till diktaturer.« (party programme ↗)“Sweden should not export weapons to dictatorships.”
- accountability for war crimes»Internationella brottmålsdomstolens roll för att lagföra brott mot mänskliga rättigheter ska stärkas.« (party programme ↗)“The International Criminal Court's role in prosecuting crimes against human rights should be strengthened.”
The plan gives precedence to peaceful methods over use of weapons and establishes that weapons exports shall not go to countries engaged in offensive warfare or states with systematic violations of human rights.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan gives precedence to peaceful methods over use of weapons and establishes that weapons exports shall not go to countries engaged in offensive warfare or states with systematic violations of human rights. That war crimes are investigated and tried follows from the requirement that international courts be strengthened. Terminating a trade agreement is a sanction, and such measures are according to the plan a tool of last resort, which makes the support less unambiguous.
Original (Swedish)
Planen ger fredliga metoder företräde framför vapenbruk och slår fast att vapenexport inte ska gå till offensivt krigförande länder eller stater med systematiska kränkningar av mänskliga rättigheter. Att krigsbrott utreds och prövas följer av kravet att internationella domstolar ska stärkas. Att säga upp ett handelsavtal är en sanktion, och sådana är enligt planen ett medel för sista utvägen, vilket gör stödet mindre entydigt.
- peaceful methods firstdecisive»Vid konflikter har fredliga metoder, såsom diskussion och förhandling, företräde framför vapenbruk.« (party programme ↗)“In conflicts, peaceful methods, such as discussion and negotiation, shall take precedence over use of weapons.”
- restrictive weapons exports»Export ska ej gå till offensivt krigförande länder eller till stater där det förekommer systematiska kränkningar av mänskliga rättigheter.« (party programme ↗)“Exports shall not go to countries engaged in offensive warfare or to states where systematic violations of human rights occur.”
- accountability in international courts»Därför måste FN:s ställning skyddas och stärkas, liksom olika internationella domstolar och rättssystem inom FN-systemet.« (party programme ↗)“Therefore, the UN's position must be protected and strengthened, as must various international courts and legal systems within the UN system.”
- sanctions as a last resort»Som en sista utväg kan bojkott och sanktioner bli aktuella.« (party programme ↗)“As a last resort, boycotts and sanctions may become relevant.”
flags: citat_migrerat
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan does not address the conflict in Gaza.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan does not address the conflict in Gaza. Its foreign policy line is that Sweden acts together with like-minded countries and that the EU alongside NATO is the most important cooperation, and that foreign policy should protect Swedish interests and free trade. Terminating a trade agreement and imposing an arms embargo against a single party are unilateral measures that the plan does not support.
Original (Swedish)
Planen behandlar inte konflikten i Gaza. Dess utrikespolitiska linje är att Sverige agerar tillsammans med likasinnade och att EU vid sidan av Nato är det viktigaste samarbetet, samt att utrikespolitiken ska värna svenska intressen och frihandel. Att säga upp ett handelsavtal och införa vapenembargo mot en enskild part är ensidiga åtgärder som planen inte ger stöd för.
- act through the EUdecisive»EU är tillsammans med Nato vårt allra viktigaste internationella samarbete.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The EU is together with NATO our most important international cooperation.”
- interest-based foreign policyweak support»Svensk utrikespolitik ska värna svenska intressen.« (party programme ↗)“Swedish foreign policy should protect Swedish interests.”
- cooperation with like-minded»Sverige ska fortsätta att tillsammans med likasinnade nationer« (party programme ↗)“Sweden should continue together with like-minded nations”
flags: citat_svagt
The plan states that the relationship with Israel, as the only democracy in its region, should be restored and nurtured, and that Islamism and terrorism shall be combated.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan states that the relationship with Israel, as the only democracy in its region, should be restored and nurtured, and that Islamism and terrorism shall be combated. Requirements that the union terminate the trade agreement and impose a weapons embargo against one of the parties go directly against that commitment. The plan also does not want the EU's foreign policy power to be expanded at the expense of member states.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att relationen till Israel, som den enda demokratin i sin region, bör återupprättas och vårdas, och att islamism och terrorism ska bekämpas. Krav på att unionen säger upp handelsavtalet och inför vapenembargo mot en av parterna går rakt emot det åtagandet. Planen vill dessutom inte att EU:s utrikespolitiska makt utvidgas på medlemsstaternas bekostnad.
- vårdad relation till Israeldecisive»Relationen till Israel, som den enda demokratin i sin region, bör återupprättas och vårdas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The relationship with Israel, as the only democracy in its region, should be restored and nurtured.”
- bekämpad islamism»Bekämpa internationell terrorism och islamism« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Combat international terrorism and Islamism”
- nej till utvidgad EU-makt»Stoppa maktöverföringar och EU-skatter« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Stop transfers of power and EU taxes”
- svenska intressen främst»Värna svenska intressen i internationella sammanhang« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Protect Swedish interests in international contexts”
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2023/24:UU10)
- Committee report full text (HB01UU10)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2023/24:1668 — Skärpta sanktioner mot Ryssland av Anders Ygeman (S)
- Motion 2023/24:190 — Utredning om Elon Musks roll i Ukrainakriget av Magnus Jacobsson (KD)
- Motion 2023/24:191 — Ökat stöd till Ukraina av Magnus Jacobsson (KD)
- Motion 2023/24:197 — Balkankonferens avseende handel och försoning av Magnus Jacobsson (KD)
- Motion 2023/24:2343 — En svensk utvecklingspolitik för rättvisa, jämställdhet och hållbar utveckling av Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2023/24:2466 — Utrikes- och biståndspolitik av Kerstin Lundgren m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2023/24:2562 — Internationell samverkan av Morgan Johansson m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2023/24:2564 — Försvar och samhällets krisberedskap av Peter Hultqvist m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2023/24:2605 — Belarus av Martin Ådahl (C)
- Motion 2023/24:2836 — med anledning av skr. 2023/24:115 Verksamheten i Europeiska unionen under 2023 av Håkan Svenneling m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2023/24:292 — Europeisk federation av Joar Forssell (L)
- Motion 2023/24:462 — Nordafrika och Mellanöstern av Håkan Svenneling m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2023/24:476 — Internationella relationer och mänskliga rättigheter av Markus Wiechel m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2023/24:481 — Sverigedemokraternas biståndspolitik av Yasmine Eriksson m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2023/24:482 — Säkerhetspolitik av Aron Emilsson m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2023/24:486 — Vissa Latinamerikafrågor av Markus Wiechel m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2023/24:729 — Skärpning av EU:s sanktioner mot regimen i Belarus av Mikael Oscarsson (KD)
- Motion 2023/24:731 — Flytt av Sveriges ambassad till Jerusalem av Mikael Oscarsson (KD)
- Motion 2023/24:732 — Förföljelse av kristna av Mikael Oscarsson (KD)
- Motion 2023/24:964 — Sveriges globala röst av Per Bolund m.fl. (MP)
Source: The Swedish Parliament