2023-05-032022/23:CU18 · p.3CUCivil law & housing

The future design of legislation

Future shape of train passengers' rights

What's at stake: The question concerns how strong protection train passengers should have in the event of delays and cancellations, compared with other modes such as air travel. It affects everyone travelling by train, particularly on local and regional journeys.

Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.

What the vote decides

Whether the rules on train passengers' rights should be made more uniform and generous beyond the EU regulation — e.g. neutrality between transport modes, uniform rules for short and long journeys, a wider right to pay on board, and faster refunds — or whether the current regulation is already well balanced.

Yes Yes — the committee proposal

The committee supports the government's proposal exempting transport operators from the duty to pay fare reductions for delays caused by force majeure, including in local and regional traffic, and rejects the other motions on matters such as uniform rules and wider onboard payment rights. The committee considers that the new EU regulation and the bill already strengthen passengers' rights and that the regulation is well balanced.

No No — the reservations

Reservation 2 (S)

The government's proposal is insufficient. Further action is needed for the climate goals, clearer information for passengers, and a wider right to compensation. The rules should be made neutral between modes of transport and uniform between short and long journeys, the right to pay on board should be extended to all passengers, the ability to bring a bicycle on board should be improved, and the refund period should be shortened to match air tickets.

Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.

VSMPCLKDMSD
YesNoAbstainAbsent

What do the votes mean here?

Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).

No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 2 by S.

Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.

What each plan points to — and how the party voted

For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.

PlanVoteConfidenceEvidence
VNoAbstain 0/0/20/4departs from the planconfidence: highnot addressed
Sown reservationNoNo 0/94/0/13follows the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
MPNoAbstain 0/0/14/4departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
CNoYes 21/0/0/3departs from the planconfidence: mediumderived
LNoYes 13/0/0/3departs from the planconfidence: lowderived
KDNoYes 16/0/0/3departs from the planconfidence: lownot addressed
MYesYes 60/0/0/8follows the planconfidence: lowderived
SDNoAbstain 0/0/63/9departs from the planconfidence: lownot addressed

Committee proposal

Parliament rejects the motions 2022/23:1003 by Mikael Eskilandersson et al. (SD) motion 29, 2022/23:2350 by Nadja Awad et al. (V) motions 1-3, 2022/23:2351 by Mikael Eskilandersson et al. (SD) motions 1 and 2, 2022/23:2352 by Jennie Nilsson et al. (S) motions 1-4 and 2022/23:2354 by Katarina Luhr et al. (MP) motion 2.

Original (Swedish)

Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2022/23:1003 av Mikael Eskilandersson m.fl. (SD) yrkande 29, 2022/23:2350 av Nadja Awad m.fl. (V) yrkandena 1-3, 2022/23:2351 av Mikael Eskilandersson m.fl. (SD) yrkandena 1 och 2, 2022/23:2352 av Jennie Nilsson m.fl. (S) yrkandena 1-4 och 2022/23:2354 av Katarina Luhr m.fl. (MP) yrkande 2.

Riksdag decision: Parliament said yes to the government's proposal about changed rules for public transport passengers and railway traffic. The EU has introduced a new train passenger regulation that contains basic rules about transport agreements, information and tickets. Due to the new train passenger regulation, the government proposes partly an exemption from the passenger's right to a price discount if a delay is caused by an extraordinary event. For example, extreme weather conditions or a major public health crisis. The proposal also states that railway traffic operated for historical purposes or tourism shall be exempted from the train passenger regulation. The new rules come into effect on 7 June 2023.

Counter-proposals

Plan vs actual vote

Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.

VVänsterpartietNoAbstaindeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan requires that public transport be expanded and made cheaper and more accessible throughout the country, that local and regional transport be entirely tax-financed and free for users and that transport be shifted to railways.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan requires that public transport be expanded and made cheaper and more accessible throughout the country, that local and regional transport be entirely tax-financed and free for users and that transport be shifted to railways. Passengers' rights, uniform rules between transport modes and better opportunities to bring a bicycle strengthen precisely that accessibility and climate benefit. The counter-proposal's requirement for more far-reaching rules is therefore supported.

Original (Swedish)

Planen kräver att kollektivtrafiken byggs ut och görs billigare och mer tillgänglig i hela landet, att den lokala och regionala trafiken är fullt skattefinansierad och gratis för brukaren och att transporter flyttas till järnväg. Resenärers rättigheter, enhetliga regler mellan trafikslag och bättre möjligheter att ta med cykel stärker just tillgängligheten och klimatnyttan. Motförslagets krav på mer långtgående regler stöds därför.

  • cheaper and accessible public transportdecisive»För att såväl öka alla människors rörelsefrihet som för att minska utsläppen av växthusgaser så behöver även kollektivtrafiken byggas ut och göras billigare och mer tillgänglig i hela landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“In order both to increase all people's freedom of movement and to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, public transport also needs to be expanded and made cheaper and more accessible throughout the country.”
  • tax-financed public transport»ska vara fullt ut skattefinansierad och gratis för brukaren.« (party programme ↗)“shall be entirely tax-financed and free for users.”
  • accessibility for all passengers»tillgänglig både fysiskt och ekonomiskt.« (party programme ↗)“accessible both physically and economically.”
  • shifting to railways»Tunga transporter behöver styras till järnväg och hållbar sjöfart.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Heavy transport needs to be steered to railways and sustainable maritime shipping.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

SSocialdemokraternaNoNofollows the plannot addressed

The party programme requires that transport systems be redesigned for more walking, cycling and public transport and places the consumer's position at the centre, and the election manifesto wants through massive rail investments to get more people to travel climate-smart and makes public transport cheaper for young people.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The party programme requires that transport systems be redesigned for more walking, cycling and public transport and places the consumer's position at the centre, and the election manifesto wants through massive rail investments to get more people to travel climate-smart and makes public transport cheaper for young people. Demands for traffic mode-neutral and uniform rules, expanded right to pay on board, better bicycle carriage and shorter refund periods go in that direction, but the details are not addressed in the plan.

Original (Swedish)

Partiprogrammet kräver att transportsystemen läggs om mot mer gång-, cykel- och kollektivtrafik och sätter konsumentens ställning i centrum, och valmanifestet vill genom massiva järnvägsinvesteringar få fler att resa klimatsmart och gör kollektivtrafiken billigare för unga. Krav på trafikslagsneutrala och enhetliga regler, utökad rätt att betala ombord, bättre cykelmedtagning och kortare återbetalningstider ligger i den riktningen, men detaljerna behandlas inte i planen.

  • shift to rail and cyclingdecisive»Transportsystemen ska läggas om för mer gång-, cykel- och kollektivtrafik och så att« (party programme ↗)“Transport systems shall be redesigned for more walking, cycling and public transport and so that”
  • more should travel by train»Genom massiva investeringar i både ny och befintlig järnväg kommer fler att kunna resa klimatsmart med tåg.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Through massive investments in both new and existing railway, more will be able to travel climate-smart by train.”
  • strengthened consumer position»Socialdemokratin vill att varje människa som medborgare, löntagare och konsument ska ha« (party programme ↗)“Social Democracy wants every person as citizen, wage-earner and consumer to have”
  • cheaper public transport»Vi vill ge möjligheten till gymnasieelever och studenter att resa avgiftsfritt i kollektivtrafiken under sommaren.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to give the opportunity for secondary school and university students to travel free in public transport during summer.”
MPMiljöpartietNoAbstaindeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan wants to expand public transport and make it cheaper and simpler to travel by bus and train, and requires that train companies coordinate fares and tickets to become more consumer-friendly.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan wants to expand public transport and make it cheaper and simpler to travel by bus and train, and requires that train companies coordinate fares and tickets to become more consumer-friendly. Uniform rules between modes of transport, expanded right to pay on board, better bicycle carrying and shorter refund periods are such consumer-friendly improvements. The plan furthermore wants to promote cycling and public transport for climate reasons.

Original (Swedish)

Planen vill bygga ut kollektivtrafiken och göra det billigare och enklare att resa med buss och tåg, och kräver att tågbolagen samordnar taxor och biljetter för att bli mer konsumentvänliga. Enhetliga regler mellan trafikslag, utökad rätt att betala ombord, bättre cykelmedtagning och kortare återbetalningstider är sådana konsumentvänliga förbättringar. Planen vill dessutom främja cykel och kollektivtrafik av klimatskäl.

  • more consumer-friendly train journeysdecisive»måste samordna taxor, biljettbeställning och« (party programme ↗)“must coordinate fares, ticket booking and”
  • cheaper and better public transport»bygga ut kollektivtrafiken i hela landet, och gör det billigare att åka buss och tåg, särskilt för unga och pensionärer.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“expand public transport throughout the country, and make it cheaper to travel by bus and train, especially for young people and pensioners.”
  • strong consumer protection»god konsumentvägledning, tydlig märkning av varor och tjänster« (party programme ↗)“good consumer guidance, clear labelling of goods and services”
  • cycling and public transport promoted»minska bilåkandet i storstäderna och främja gång-, cykel- och kollektivtrafik.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“reduce car driving in major cities and promote walking, cycling and public transport.”

flags: citat_migrerat

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

CCenterpartietNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The plan demands that public transport and cycling become smoother and more attractive and that it shall be simple to opt out of the car in favour of train, bus, boat and cycling.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan demands that public transport and cycling become smoother and more attractive and that it shall be simple to opt out of the car in favour of train, bus, boat and cycling. More uniform rules, better information, expanded right to pay on board and easier cycle transport make travel more attractive and climate-smart. The plan also invests broadly in rail transport throughout the country.

Original (Swedish)

Planen kräver att kollektivtrafik och cykel blir smidigare och attraktivare och att det ska vara enkelt att välja bort bilen till förmån för tåg, buss, båt och cykel. Enhetligare regler, bättre information, utökad rätt att betala ombord och lättare cykeltransport gör just resandet mer attraktivt och klimatsmart. Planen satsar dessutom brett på tågtrafiken i hela landet.

  • attractive public transportdecisive»Utsläppsfria transporter, cyklar, elbilar och kollektivtrafik ska bli smidigare och attraktivare.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Emission-free transport, bicycles, electric cars and public transport shall become smoother and more attractive.”
  • easy to opt out of the car»Det ska dessutom vara smidigt att välja bort bilen till förmån för tåg, buss, båt och cykel.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It shall also be easy to opt out of the car in favour of train, bus, boat and cycling.”
  • investment in railways»Vi vill rusta upp regionala järnvägar, bygga nya stambanor från norr till söder, höja standarden på det nationella stambanenätet i hela landet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to upgrade regional railways, build new trunk lines from north to south, raise the standard of the national trunk railway network throughout the country”
  • better cycling opportunities»Landsbygden behöver bättre vägar och bättre tillgång till cykelvägar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The countryside needs better roads and better access to cycle paths.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

LLiberalernaNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The plan wants to strengthen the individual's position in everyday contracts through improved consumer legislation and maintains high ambition for consumer protection in the EU.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan wants to strengthen the individual's position in everyday contracts through improved consumer legislation and maintains high ambition for consumer protection in the EU. More uniform and neutral regulations between transport modes, better cycling opportunities, and shorter refund periods are in line with this and the plan's goal of fossil-free public transport. The plan does not address train passengers' rights specifically, so support is derived.

Original (Swedish)

Planen vill stärka den enskildes ställning i vardagens avtal genom förbättrad konsumentlagstiftning och håller en hög ambitionsnivå för konsumentskyddet i EU. Enhetligare och mer neutrala regler mellan trafikslag, bättre cykelmöjligheter och kortare återbetalningstider ligger i linje med detta och med planens mål om fossilfri kollektivtrafik. Planen behandlar inte tågresenärers rättigheter särskilt, så stödet är härlett.

  • stronger consumer rightsdecisive»enskildes inflytande över de avtal som ingås i vardagen behöver stärkas genom förbättrad konsument- och« (party programme ↗)“individuals' influence over everyday contracts needs to be strengthened through improved consumer”
  • high ambition in consumer protection»Målet ska vara att konsumentlagstiftningen i EU-länderna ligger på en hög ambitionsnivå, men med« (party programme ↗)“The goal should be that consumer legislation in EU countries is at a high ambition level, but with”
  • fossil-free public transport»Fler flygresor ska göras fossilfria och all kollektivtrafik på väg och spår ska vara fossilfri senast 2030.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“More flights should be made fossil-free and all public transport on road and rail should be fossil-free by 2030.”
  • facilitate cycling»Cykling är ett effektivt och miljövänligt transportslag för främst kortare resor.« (party programme ↗)“Cycling is an efficient and environmentally friendly mode of transport mainly for shorter journeys.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

KDKristdemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan wants public transport by bus, tram, train and underground to be attractive travel alternatives and for each mode of transport to bear its own socioeconomic costs, which supports neutral and uniform rules between transport modes.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan wants public transport by bus, tram, train and underground to be attractive travel alternatives and for each mode of transport to bear its own socioeconomic costs, which supports neutral and uniform rules between transport modes. The bicycle is highlighted as an important daily means of transport, which supports better bike-carrying capacity. The plan does not, however, address repayment periods or the right to pay on board, making the conclusion uncertain.

Original (Swedish)

Planen vill att kollektivtrafiken med buss, spårvagn, tåg och tunnelbana är attraktiva resealternativ och att varje trafikslag bär sina egna samhällsekonomiska kostnader, vilket talar för neutrala och enhetliga regler mellan trafikslag. Cykeln pekas ut som ett viktigt dagligt transportmedel, vilket stödjer bättre cykelmedtagning. Planen behandlar däremot inte återbetalningstider eller rätten att betala ombord, varför slutsatsen är osäker.

  • attractive public transportdecisive»Kollektivtrafiken med buss, spårvagn, tåg och« (party programme ↗)“Public transport by bus, tram, train and”
  • transport modes bear own costs»Målet ska vara att respektive transportslag bär sina egna samhällsekonomiska« (party programme ↗)“The goal shall be that each mode of transport bears its own socioeconomic”
  • the bicycle as a means of transport»Cykeln är för många ett viktigt och dagligt transportmedel.« (party programme ↗)“The bicycle is for many an important and daily means of transport.”
  • informed consumers»En fungerande marknadsekonomi kräver aktiva« (party programme ↗)“A functioning market economy requires active”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

MModeraternaYesYesfollows the planderived

The plan wishes to counteract over-implementation and carry out EU rules at minimum level and drastically reduce businesses' regulatory burden.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan wishes to counteract over-implementation and carry out EU rules at minimum level and drastically reduce businesses' regulatory burden. The counter-proposal by contrast demands longer-reaching obligations for transport operators than the EU regulation, partly with climate targets as reason, while the programme warns against climate policy that becomes costly symbolic politics. Passenger rights are not addressed in the documents, so the conclusion is derived from nearest principles.

Original (Swedish)

Planen vill motverka överimplementering och genomföra EU-regler på miniminivå samt kraftigt minska företagens regelbörda. Motförslaget kräver tvärtom längre gående skyldigheter för transportörerna än EU-förordningen, delvis med klimatmålen som skäl, medan programmet varnar för klimatpolitik som blir dyrbar symbolpolitik. Resenärsrättigheter behandlas inte i dokumenten, så slutsatsen härleds ur närmast liggande principer.

  • EU rules at minimum leveldecisive»som huvudregel ska EU-direktiv genomföras på miniminivå« (2022 manifesto ↗)“as a main rule EU directives shall be implemented at minimum level”
  • reduced regulatory burden»Ta bort en tredjedel av företagens administrationskostnader och en tredjedel av regelkrånglet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Remove one-third of businesses' administrative costs and one-third of regulatory burden”
  • no climate symbolic politics»Klimatpolitiken får aldrig reduceras till dyrbar symbolpolitik eller snäv klimatnationalism.« (party programme ↗)“Climate policy must never reduce to costly symbolic politics or narrow climate nationalism.”
  • punctuality before new burdens»Rusta upp dagens järnväg i stället för att satsa på höghastighetståg som riskerar att vara omoderna redan innan de är klara« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Upgrade today's railways instead of investing in high-speed rail that risks being obsolete before completion”
SDSverigedemokraternaNoAbstaindeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan states that all modes of transport are important and opposes certain modes of transport being taxed or treated unilaterally harshly, which speaks for neutral and uniform rules between modes of transport and between short and long-distance travel.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan states that all modes of transport are important and opposes certain modes of transport being taxed or treated unilaterally harshly, which speaks for neutral and uniform rules between modes of transport and between short and long-distance travel. The practical requirements of being able to pay on board, bring a bicycle and receive faster reimbursement strengthen travelers without conflicting with the plan. The plan, however, does not share the climate motivation behind the counter-proposal, as it rejects symbolic politics.

Original (Swedish)

Planen slår fast att samtliga transportslag är viktiga och vänder sig mot att vissa trafikslag beskattas eller behandlas ensidigt hårt, vilket talar för neutrala och enhetliga regler mellan trafikslag och mellan kort- och långväga resor. De praktiska kraven om att kunna betala ombord, ta med cykel och få snabbare återbetalning stärker resenärerna utan att stå i strid med planen. Klimatmotivet bakom motförslaget delar planen däremot inte, eftersom den avvisar symbolpolitik.

  • alla trafikslag behövsdecisive»Sverigedemokraterna anser att samtliga transportslag, inklusive bil och flyg, är viktiga för att samhället ska fungera.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden Democrats believe that all modes of transport, including car and air, are important for society to function.”
  • trafikslagsneutralitet»Att ensidigt beskatta vissa trafikslag extremt hårt slår mot dem som saknar alternativ till bilen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Unilaterally taxing certain modes of transport extremely heavily hits those who lack alternatives to the car.”
  • fungerande resande i hela landet»Rusta upp väg- och järnvägsnätet i hela landet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Upgrade road and rail networks throughout the country”
  • ingen symbolpolitik»Stoppa symbolpolitik som går ut över möjligheten att bedriva industri och näring« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Stop symbolic politics that goes at the expense of the possibility to conduct industry and commerce”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

Share and embed

Embed as a widget (iframe): previewSizeLanguage

Sources and documents

Documents under consideration

Source: The Swedish Parliament