2026-06-092025/26:UU10 · p.1UUForeign affairs
Overarching questions
Climate conditions for EU budget support and the EU's enlargement policy
What's at stake: The decision affects how hard member states are pressed to live up to their climate commitments in order to receive EU support, and how the EU's enlargement toward new member states is conditioned on rule of law and other fundamental values. It concerns the EU's credibility both as a climate actor and as a model for candidate countries.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the EU's budget support to member states should be conditioned on a dedicated climate lock in addition to the existing control mechanisms for climate commitments, and how strictly the merit- and conditionality-based principle should be applied in the EU's enlargement policy.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee maintains that EU enlargement should be merit-based and conditioned on progress on rule of law and human rights, notes that the EU's control mechanisms for member states' climate commitments have already been tightened through annual review and requirements under the governance regulation, and therefore agrees to reject the call for a dedicated climate lock on the EU budget.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 3 (C)
The reservation (C) wants Sweden and the EU to lead with ambitious emission-reduction targets and for a climate lock, similar to the rule-of-law lock, to be introduced on the EU budget so that member states that fail to take sufficient climate action do not receive EU support.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 3 by C.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have held
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: MPMiljöpartiet
Ja 190–23Ja 172–41
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Abstain 0/0/20/1 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| S | No | Abstain 1/0/105/0 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
| MP | No | Yes 18/0/0/0 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| C | No | No 0/23/0/1 | match | confidence: medium | derived |
| L | No | Yes 16/0/0/0 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
| KD | Yes | Yes 18/0/0/1 | match | confidence: low | derived |
| M | Yes | Yes 64/0/0/2 | match | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| SD | Yes | Yes 68/0/0/2 | match | confidence: high | explicit |
Broke with the party line
| SKenneth G Forslund (S, Västra Götalands läns västra) | Yes — party line: Abstain |
MPs whose vote differs from their party's majority position in this division. Marked with a dark ring in the chamber view.
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2025/26:3623 by Morgan Johansson et al. (S) motion item 36, 2025/26:3729 by Kerstin Lundgren et al. (C) motion item 34 and 2025/26:3988 by Håkan Svenneling et al. (V) motion items 8 and 37.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2025/26:3623 av Morgan Johansson m.fl. (S) yrkande 36, 2025/26:3729 av Kerstin Lundgren m.fl. (C) yrkande 34 och 2025/26:3988 av Håkan Svenneling m.fl. (V) yrkandena 8 och 37.
Riksdag decision: The Government has submitted a report on activities in the EU during 2025. The report covers decisions and events in the union and presents the breadth of the union's issues based on the work in the different ministerial councils. In the report, the Government describes how European security has been challenged by an unstable neighbourhood, hybrid threats and a global context in which the rules-based world order is being questioned. The Riksdag considers, as before, that it is central to Sweden's security and stability in the world that the rules-based world order is maintained. During the year, Sweden has been a driving force behind the EU imposing further sanctions against Russia and Belarus due to Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine. The Riksdag welcomes that the Government is working to increase pressure on Russia. The enlargement process in the union has also made progress during 2025. The Riksdag considers that an enlargement is important for peace, stability and prosperity in Europe. But an enlargement is only possible if the process is perceived as legitimate and has broad support in the member states. Furthermore, the Riksdag considers that respect for the EU's common fundamental values – democracy, the rule of law, human rights and international law – is one of the union's foremost assets that must be guaranteed. The Riksdag filed the report away, that is, concluded the matter.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants Sweden to be a leader in EU emission reductions and for the EU to introduce a climate lock on its budget. (C) — Reservation 3
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan requires sharpened climate targets for all emissions that Swedish policy has influence over and that Sweden plays a driving role for far-reaching international climate agreements that set requirements on pace.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires sharpened climate targets for all emissions that Swedish policy has influence over and that Sweden plays a driving role for far-reaching international climate agreements that set requirements on pace. A climate lock that conditions EU support with sufficient climate measures is precisely such a mechanism of requirements. That the party is otherwise EU-critical does not change that climate and environmental regulations within the EU shall be defended and built upon.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver skärpta klimatmål för alla utsläpp som svensk politik har inflytande över och att Sverige är pådrivande för långtgående internationella klimatavtal som ställer krav på takten. Ett klimatlås som villkorar EU-stöd med tillräckliga klimatåtgärder är just en sådan kravmekanism. Att partiet i övrigt är EU-kritiskt ändrar inte att de klimat- och miljöregleringar som finns inom EU ska försvaras och byggas vidare på.
- driving in climate agreementsdecisive»Vi vill att Sverige ska spela en pådrivande roll« (party programme ↗)“We want Sweden to play a driving role”
- sharpened climate targets»ett program med utgångspunkt i uppdaterade klimatmål för alla utsläpp som svensk politik har inflytande över« (2022 manifesto ↗)“a programme based on updated climate targets for all emissions that Swedish policy has influence over”
- defend EU's climate regulations»utbyte mellan länder och vissa klimat- och miljöregleringar.« (party programme ↗)“exchange between countries and certain climate and environmental regulations.”
- climate emergency requires sharpening»Vi befinner oss i ett klimatnödläge.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We are in a climate emergency.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan wants Sweden to drive the issue in the EU and UN for countries in the world to increase their climate commitments and requires climate perspective at all levels of decision-making.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants Sweden to drive the issue in the EU and UN for countries in the world to increase their climate commitments and requires climate perspective at all levels of decision-making. A climate lock on the EU budget is the same kind of conditioning as the plan already accepts when it wants EU countries that have abandoned the rule of law principles not to remain as members. The requirement for ambitious emission reduction targets follows directly from the plan's leadership ambition in the climate transition.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill att Sverige driver på i EU och FN för att världens länder ökar sina klimatåtaganden och kräver klimatperspektiv på alla nivåer av beslutsfattande. Ett klimatlås på EU-budgeten är samma slags villkorande som planen redan accepterar när den vill att EU-länder som övergett rättsstatens principer inte får vara kvar som medlemmar. Kravet på ambitiösa utsläppsminskningsmål följer direkt av planens ledarskapsambition i klimatomställningen.
- driving force in the EU and UNdecisive»Sverige ska vara en stark kraft i FN och EU för att världens länder ska öka sina åtaganden för att göra verklighet av Parisavtalets ambitioner.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden must be a strong force in the UN and EU for the world's countries to increase their commitments to make reality of the Paris Agreement's ambitions.”
- climate perspective in all decisions»Klimatperspektiv på alla nivåer av beslut och beslutsfattande.« (party programme ↗)“Climate perspective at all levels of decisions and decision-making.”
- conditional EU membership»EU-länder som övergett demokratin och rättsstatens principer tillåts inte vara kvar som« (party programme ↗)“EU countries that have abandoned democracy and the rule of law principles are not permitted to remain as”
- Swedish climate leadership»Svenskt ledarskap i klimatomställningen genom stark industri och innovationskraft.« (party programme ↗)“Swedish leadership in the climate transition through strong industry and innovation capacity.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan states that the EU should be the leading force in global climate action and that member states must lead by example, which is exactly what the counter-proposal requires.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan states that the EU should be the leading force in global climate action and that member states must lead by example, which is exactly what the counter-proposal requires. The plan also accepts that EU funding can be withdrawn as a pressure measure against member states that do not meet the union's requirements, which is the mechanism on which a climate lock is built. Stricter climate control measures in the EU are furthermore an explicit election promise.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att EU ska vara den ledande kraften i det globala klimatarbetet och att medlemsländerna själva måste gå före, vilket är precis det motförslaget kräver. Planen accepterar också att EU-stöd dras in som påtryckningsmedel mot medlemsstater som inte lever upp till unionens krav, vilket är den mekanism ett klimatlås bygger på. Skärpta klimatstyrmedel i EU är dessutom ett uttryckligt vallöfte.
- the EU should lead climate actiondecisive»EU ska vara den ledande kraften i det globala klimatarbetet och driva på för att minska« (party programme ↗)“The EU should be the leading force in global climate action and drive to reduce”
- withdrawn EU funding as a sanction»ska kunna få sanktioner riktade mot sig, exempelvis genom indragna EU-stöd, förlorad« (party programme ↗)“can be subject to sanctions, for example through withdrawn EU funding, lost”
- stricter EU climate control measures»höja priset på utsläppsrätter i EU, inkludera utsläpp från flyg och sjöfart i systemet och införa klimattullar på varor från länder utanför EU.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“increase the price of emission allowances in the EU, include emissions from aviation and shipping in the system and introduce climate tariffs on goods from countries outside the EU.”
- binding emissions budget»ta fram en svensk utsläppsbudget som gör att vi når klimatmålen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“develop a Swedish emission budget that ensures we meet the climate targets.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan puts climate first and requires leadership that is firmly resolved that Sweden shall go first and show the way, and that the EU's climate tools become even more ambitious.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan puts climate first and requires leadership that is firmly resolved that Sweden shall go first and show the way, and that the EU's climate tools become even more ambitious. A climate lock that conditions EU support on actual climate action follows from the principle that common policy shall become more powerful precisely on climate and that weak requirements shall not prevent strengthened ambitions. The counter-proposal's requirements are thus in line with the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Planen sätter klimatet först och kräver ett ledarskap som är fast beslutet att Sverige ska gå före och visa vägen, samt att EU:s klimatverktyg görs ännu mer ambitiösa. Ett klimatlås som villkorar EU-stöd mot faktiska klimatåtgärder följer av principen att den gemensamma politiken ska bli kraftfullare just på klimatområdet och att låga krav inte får hindra skärpta ambitioner. Motförslagets krav ligger därmed i linje med planen.
- Sweden shall lead in climate policydecisive»Ett ledarskap som tar klimatfrågan på allvar och som är fast beslutet att Sverige ska gå före och visa vägen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Leadership that takes the climate question seriously and is firmly resolved that Sweden shall go first and show the way.”
- more ambitious EU climate policy»EU:s system för handel med utsläppsrätter är bland de mest effektiva verktyg vi har, och vi vill göra det ännu mer ambitiöst och öppna upp det för fler länder som vill ansluta sig.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The EU's system for trading in emission allowances is among the most effective tools we have, and we want to make it even more ambitious and open it up to more countries that want to join.”
- more powerful joint climate policy»På områden som klimatomställningen, frihandeln och den gränsöverskridande brottsligheten bör den gemensamma politiken bli kraftfullare« (party programme ↗)“In areas such as climate transition, free trade and cross-border crime the common policy should become more powerful”
- science-based climate goals»Klimatpolitiken ska utgå från vad vetenskapen visar är nödvändigt för att undvika farliga förändringar.« (party programme ↗)“Climate policy shall be based on what science shows is necessary to avoid dangerous changes.”
The plan makes the EU the most important instrument for climate work and requires that the union's ambitions be raised and regulations be tightened.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan makes the EU the most important instrument for climate work and requires that the union's ambitions be raised and regulations be tightened. It also accepts that EU support be withdrawn as a sanction when member states break common commitments, which is exactly the construction the counter-proposal's climate lock builds on. The requirement that Sweden and the EU lead with ambitious emission targets follows directly from the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Planen gör EU till det viktigaste instrumentet för klimatarbetet och kräver att unionens ambitioner höjs och regelverken skärps. Den accepterar också att EU-stöd dras in som sanktion när medlemsländer bryter mot gemensamma åtaganden, vilket är exakt den konstruktion motförslagets klimatlås bygger på. Kravet på att Sverige och EU går före med ambitiösa utsläppsmål följer direkt av planen.
- raised EU ambitionsdecisive»EU-samarbetet är vårt viktigaste instrument för att driva på miljöarbetet internationellt. EU:s ambitioner måste höjas och regelverken skärpas.« (party programme ↗)“EU cooperation is our most important tool to drive environmental work internationally. The union's ambitions must be raised and regulations must be tightened.”
- increased European climate ambitions»Inte minst vill vi öka de europeiska klimatambitionerna samt se en tätare samverkan mot inre och yttre hot.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Not least, we want to increase European climate ambitions and see closer cooperation against internal and external threats.”
- withdrawn EU support as sanction»Systematiska kränkningar av medborgarnas rättigheter eller diskriminering av minoriteter ska kunna leda till sanktioner i form av indragna EU-stöd efter beslut av EU-domstolen, eller i särskilt allvarliga fall suspenderad rösträtt i rådet.« (party programme ↗)“Systematic violations of citizens' rights or discrimination of minorities shall be able to result in sanctions in the form of withdrawn EU support after decision of the EU court, or in particularly serious cases suspended voting rights in the council.”
- European climate policy instruments»Det behövs en europeisk koldioxidskatt och klimattullar för att höja kostnaden för utsläpp, samtidigt som det europeiska klimatbiståndet ökar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“A European carbon tax and climate tariffs are needed to raise the cost of emissions, while European climate aid increases.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan wants environmental policy to be flexible enough that every country and region can adapt measures to their circumstances and that the EU's tasks are delimited to prevent unwelcome centralization.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants environmental policy to be flexible enough that every country and region can adapt measures to their circumstances and that the EU's tasks are delimited to prevent unwelcome centralization. A climate lock that conditions payments from the EU budget pulls in the opposite direction and disturbs the subsidiarity principle's distribution of power. The plan agrees that the EU should work toward solving the climate problem, but not with this tool.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill att miljöpolitiken är så flexibel att varje land och region kan anpassa åtgärder efter sina förhållanden och att EU:s uppgifter avgränsas för att förhindra ovälkommen centralisering. Ett klimatlås som villkorar utbetalningar ur EU-budgeten drar åt motsatt håll och rubbar subsidiaritetens fördelning av makt. Att EU ska verka för en lösning av klimatproblemet delar planen, men inte detta verktyg.
- flexible national environmental policydecisive»flexibel att varje land och region kan anpassa åtgärder efter sina unika förhållanden. På« (party programme ↗)“flexible so that every country and region can adapt measures to their unique circumstances. On”
- delimited EU competence»för att förhindra ovälkommen centralisering. En mekanism för tillämpning av« (party programme ↗)“to prevent unwelcome centralization. A mechanism for application of”
- subsidiarity»Rätt makt på rätt plats, det är den kristdemokratiska subsidiaritetsprincipens innebörd.« (party programme ↗)“Right power in the right place, that is the meaning of the Christian Democratic subsidiarity principle.”
- the EU should work for climate solution»global nivå måste EU verka för en lösning av klimatproblemet. Miniminivåer för miljöavgifter« (party programme ↗)“global level must the EU work toward solving the climate problem. Minimum levels for environmental charges”
The plan establishes that the EU shall neither do nor decide on everything and shall never develop at member states' expense.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that the EU shall neither do nor decide on everything and shall never develop at member states' expense. A climate lock conditioning EU support shifts power to the union level and binds the budget to new requirements. The plan moreover warns against costly symbolic politics and points out that emissions are often reduced more cheaply through international efforts than through raised domestic targets. The demand is rejected.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att EU varken ska göra eller besluta om allt och aldrig utvecklas på medlemsstaternas bekostnad. Ett klimatlås som villkorar EU-stöd flyttar makt till unionsnivå och binder budgeten vid nya krav. Planen varnar dessutom för dyrbar symbolpolitik och pekar på att utsläppen ofta minskas billigare genom internationella insatser än genom höjda egna mål. Kravet avvisas.
- limited EU mandatedecisive»Moderaternas syn på EU speglar vår syn på statens uppgifter: EU ska varken göra eller fatta beslut om allt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Moderate view of the EU reflects our view of the state's tasks: the EU shall neither do nor decide on everything.”
- member states' sovereignty»Men EU ska aldrig utvecklas på medlemsstaternas bekostnad.« (party programme ↗)“But the EU shall never develop at member states' expense.”
- effective climate policy without symbolic politics»Klimatpolitiken får aldrig reduceras till dyrbar symbolpolitik eller snäv klimatnationalism.« (party programme ↗)“Climate policy must never reduce to costly symbolic politics or narrow climate nationalism.”
- cost-effective emission reductions»Samtidigt är kostnaden för att minska utsläppen genom internationella klimatinsatser ofta mycket lägre än för att minska utsläppen i Sverige« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Meanwhile the cost of reducing emissions through international climate efforts is often much lower than the cost of reducing emissions in Sweden”
The plan states that Swedish climate targets should be adapted to the EU level and that Sweden should not do more than necessary at the expense of living standards and competitiveness.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan states that Swedish climate targets should be adapted to the EU level and that Sweden should not do more than necessary at the expense of living standards and competitiveness. The counter-proposal's demand that Sweden and the EU lead with more ambitious emissions targets directly contradicts this. A climate lock on the EU budget also means a further shift of power to the EU, which the plan wants to stop.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att de svenska klimatmålen ska anpassas till EU-nivån och att Sverige inte ska göra mer än nödvändigt på bekostnad av levnadsstandard och konkurrenskraft. Motförslagets krav på att Sverige och EU går före med mer ambitiösa utsläppsmål strider direkt mot detta. Ett klimatlås på EU-budgeten innebär dessutom en ytterligare maktförskjutning till EU, som planen vill stoppa.
- no climate targets beyond EUdecisive»De svenska klimatmålen bör anpassas till den klimatlagstiftning som finns på EU-nivå för att inte kraven på andra länder ska bli lägre som en konsekvens av att vi gör mer än nödvändigt på bekostnad av vår levnadsstandard och konkurrenskraft.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Swedish climate targets should be adapted to the climate legislation that exists at EU level so that requirements on other countries should not be lower as a consequence of us doing more than necessary at the expense of our standard of living and competitiveness.”
- not to lead the way»Evidens, resultat och svensk konkurrenskraft ska styra genomförandet av klimatmål i högre utsträckning än politikers vilja att gå först och längst.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Evidence, results and Swedish competitiveness should guide the implementation of climate targets to a greater extent than politicians' desire to go first and furthest.”
- stop EU's increase in power»Stoppa maktöverföringar och EU-skatter« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Stop transfers of power and EU taxes”
- lower EU contribution»Kraftigt minska Sveriges EU-avgift« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Significantly reduce Sweden's EU contribution”
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2025/26:UU10)
- Committee report full text (HD01UU10)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2024/25:1431 — Vissa Asienfrågor av Markus Wiechel m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:388 — Uigurernas situation i Kina av Björn Söder och Markus Wiechel (båda SD)
- Motion 2025/26:2003 — Stöd till Moldaviens europeiska väg av Magnus Berntsson (KD)
- Motion 2025/26:2369 — Kina av Håkan Svenneling m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2025/26:2379 — Ett system för att synliggöra kringgående av internationella sanktioner av Markus Wiechel (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:2776 — Västafrika och Västsahara av Håkan Svenneling m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2025/26:2800 — Belarus av Markus Wiechel (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:2818 — En svensk utvecklings- och biståndspolitik för rättvisa, jämställdhet och hållbar utveckling av Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2025/26:2831 — En näringspolitik för tillväxt i hela landet av Elisabeth Thand Ringqvist m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2025/26:292 — EU:s avtal med och finansiering av Kubas regim av Björn Söder och Markus Wiechel (båda SD)
- Motion 2025/26:3411 — Kina - mänskliga rättigheter, miljö och geopolitik av Jacob Risberg m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2025/26:3570 — Bistånd i en ny världsordning av Anna Lasses m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2025/26:3593 — Utgiftsområde 24 Näringsliv av Fredrik Olovsson m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:3622 — Utgiftsområde 7 Internationellt bistånd av Morgan Johansson m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:3623 — Internationell samverkan av Morgan Johansson m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:3724 — Förbud mot kärnvapen och utträde ur NATO av Daniel Riazat (-)
- Motion 2025/26:3729 — Internationellt samarbete i en utmanande tid av Kerstin Lundgren m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2025/26:3795 — Klassificering av Kuba som statlig sponsor av terrorism av Markus Wiechel (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:3988 — med anledning av skr. 2025/26:115 Verksamheten i Europeiska unionen under 2025 av Håkan Svenneling m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2025/26:404 — Konfliktmineraler och deras offer av Gudrun Brunegård (KD)
Source: The Swedish Parliament