2026-04-012025/26:KU29 · p.3KUConstitution
Local State Service
Local state service and the development of service centres
What's at stake: Service centres are the main point of contact with several government agencies for many people, especially those who cannot or do not want to handle matters digitally. Decisions on the number and location of offices affect access to state services across different parts of the country.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the current direction for the network of state service centres — continued streamlining and digitalisation — is sufficient, or whether the state should instead actively expand and reopen service centres across the country.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee rejects the motions. State presence and service across the country matter, but digital services can improve service delivery, and the measures Statens servicecenter is taking toward a more cost-effective office network — along with deeper service cooperation with the Migration Agency — are seen as important without reducing quality; the committee expects work to develop the operation cost-effectively to continue.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 2 (S, V, C, MP)
Service centres are highly valued (over 2.8 million visits in 2024, 95 percent customer satisfaction), but the government's cuts to the service centre agency's budget mean at least 35 offices will close, hitting citizen service hard. Instead, service centres should continue to develop, closed offices should reopen, and more services should be attached to them, with a regional perspective in every siting decision.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 2 by S, V, C, MP.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have gone the other way
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: KDKristdemokraterna, LLiberalerna
Ja 145–144Nej 117–172
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | No 0/17/0/5 | match | confidence: high | derived |
| S | No | No 0/90/0/16 | match | confidence: high | explicit |
| MP | No | No 0/15/0/3 | match | confidence: high | derived |
| C | No | No 0/19/0/5 | match | confidence: high | explicit |
| L | No | Yes 12/0/0/4 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| KD | No | Yes 16/0/0/3 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| M | Yes | Yes 55/0/0/11 | match | confidence: low | not addressed |
| SD | No | Yes 59/0/0/11 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2025/26:684 by Sanne Lennström and Kristoffer Lindberg (both S), 2025/26:1267 by Louise Thunström et al. (S), 2025/26:1946 by Mikael Dahlqvist (S), 2025/26:2817 by Birger Lahti et al. (V) request 3 and 2025/26:3721 by Jennie Nilsson et al. (S) request 17.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2025/26:684 av Sanne Lennström och Kristoffer Lindberg (båda S), 2025/26:1267 av Louise Thunström m.fl. (S), 2025/26:1946 av Mikael Dahlqvist (S), 2025/26:2817 av Birger Lahti m.fl. (V) yrkande 3 och 2025/26:3721 av Jennie Nilsson m.fl. (S) yrkande 17.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag rejected 53 proposals in motions on public administration from the general motion period 2025. The proposals dealt with, among other things, corruption, transfer of administrative tasks, local state service, the Parliamentary Ombudsman, the county administrative boards, official activism and opinion-forming activities. The Riksdag refers, among other things, to already taken measures and ongoing work.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants the government to offer special support and guidance to municipalities and regions in combating corruption and infiltration. (S, V, C, MP) — Reservation 2
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan requires that welfare and services exist everywhere and that elderly care, preschool, school and grocery stores should exist in more small towns, and that everyone should feel that society exists where, wherever in the country you live.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that welfare and services exist everywhere and that elderly care, preschool, school and grocery stores should exist in more small towns, and that everyone should feel that society exists where, wherever in the country you live. Closed service offices go directly against that commitment, while the counter-proposal's requirements for expansion, reopening and a regional perspective follow it. The plan also sees the centralisation of services to cities as a problem that politics should correct.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att välfärd och service finns överallt och att äldreomsorg, förskola, skola och matbutik ska finnas på fler mindre orter, och att alla ska känna att samhället finns där oavsett var i landet man bor. Nedlagda servicekontor går rakt emot det åtagandet, medan motförslagets krav på utbyggnad, återöppning och regionalt perspektiv följer det. Planen ser också centraliseringen av service till städerna som ett problem som politiken ska rätta till.
- services in more small townsdecisive»Äldreomsorg, förskola, skola och matbutik behöver finnas på fler mindre orter.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Elderly care, preschool, school and grocery stores need to exist in more small towns.”
- welfare everywhere»Välfärden måste vara till för alla och finnas överallt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Welfare must be for everyone and exist everywhere.”
- society present throughout the country»Alla ska känna att samhället finns där, var i landet vi än bor.« (party programme ↗)“Everyone should feel that society exists where, wherever in the country we live.”
- functioning services everywhere»Skola, vård, omsorg och annan service behöver fungera överallt.« (party programme ↗)“School, healthcare, care and other services need to function everywhere.”
The plan establishes that the state must be present throughout the country and that citizens must have good access to public services regardless of where they live.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that the state must be present throughout the country and that citizens must have good access to public services regardless of where they live. Closure of service offices goes directly against that commitment, while the counter-proposal's requirement for continued expansion and reopened offices follows it. The plan also requires greater state responsibility for equal conditions.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att staten ska finnas närvarande i hela landet och att medborgarna ska ha god tillgång till samhällets service oavsett var de bor. Nedläggning av servicekontor går rakt emot det åtagandet, medan motförslagets krav på fortsatt utbyggnad och återöppnade kontor följer det. Planen kräver också ett större statligt ansvar för likvärdiga förutsättningar.
- state presence throughout the countrydecisive»Staten ska finnas närvarande i hela landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The state must be present throughout the country.”
- public services throughout the country»God tillgång till samhällets service i hela landet.« (party programme ↗)“Good access to public services throughout the country.”
- state responsibility for equality»Större statligt ansvar för likvärdiga förutsättningar i hela Sverige.« (party programme ↗)“Greater state responsibility for equal conditions throughout Sweden.”
- services regardless of residence»God service och välfärd till medborgarna oavsett var i landet de bor.« (party programme ↗)“Good services and welfare for citizens regardless of where in the country they live.”
The plan's core commitment is that society and its institutions shall be present in all areas and that public services shall exist across the entire country, regardless of where you live.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's core commitment is that society and its institutions shall be present in all areas and that public services shall exist across the entire country, regardless of where you live. The plan particularly points out that society has withdrawn and that market adaptation has caused public services to disappear. Building out service offices, reopening closed offices and incorporating a regional perspective is therefore what the plan requires.
Original (Swedish)
Planens bärande åtagande är att samhället och dess institutioner ska vara närvarande i alla områden och att samhällsservice ska finnas i hela landet, oavsett var man bor. Planen pekar särskilt ut att samhället dragit sig tillbaka och att marknadsanpassning fått samhällsservice att försvinna. Att bygga ut servicekontoren, öppna nedlagda kontor igen och väga in ett regionalt perspektiv är därför vad planen kräver.
- state presence in all areasdecisive»Samhället och dess institutioner ska vara närvarande i alla områden.« (party programme ↗)“Society and its institutions shall be present in all areas.”
- public services across the country»delar av landet ska leva, och att samhället ska säkerställa att samhällsservice ska finnas« (party programme ↗)“areas of the country shall live, and that society shall ensure that public services exist”
- service regardless of place of residence»du bor ska du kunna lita på att samhället finns där, med service, trygghet och« (party programme ↗)“you live you can rely on that society exists there, with service, security and”
- presence prevents segregation»För att bryta segregationen behöver samhället vara närvarande i hela landet.« (party programme ↗)“To break segregation, society needs to be present across the entire country.”
The election manifesto states that public services shall be close and reliable throughout the country and even requires that closed local offices be reopened.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto states that public services shall be close and reliable throughout the country and even requires that closed local offices be reopened. The counter-proposal's requirement for continued expansion of service offices, reopened offices and a regional perspective in location directly follows from that commitment. The plan further sees reduced state presence as a cause of lower trust.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet slår fast att offentlig service ska vara nära och pålitlig i hela landet och kräver till och med att nedlagda lokala kontor öppnas igen. Motförslagets krav på fortsatt utbyggnad av servicekontoren, återöppnade kontor och ett regionalt perspektiv vid lokalisering följer direkt av det åtagandet. Planen ser dessutom minskad myndighetsnärvaro som en orsak till lägre tillit.
- close public services everywheredecisive»Offentlig service ska vara nära och pålitlig i hela landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Public services shall be close and reliable throughout the country.”
- accessible public services»den offentliga servicen ska finnas där när man behöver den« (2022 manifesto ↗)“public services shall be there when you need them”
- reopen closed offices»det är dags att öppna upp landsbygdens polisstationer på nytt« (2022 manifesto ↗)“it is time to reopen the countryside's police stations”
- guaranteed public services»Det offentliga ska garantera att en sådan grundläggande samhällsservice finns, i hela landet,« (party programme ↗)“The public sector shall guarantee that such basic public services exist, throughout the country,”
The election manifesto explicitly states that state agencies shall be present in all parts of Sweden, and the party programme that access to state services shall be secured throughout the country.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto explicitly states that state agencies shall be present in all parts of Sweden, and the party programme that access to state services shall be secured throughout the country. The counter-proposal's requirement for expanded service offices with a regional perspective thus follows directly from the plan. The plan also affirms digital accessibility, but it does not replace the commitment to physical state presence.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet slår uttryckligen fast att statliga myndigheter ska finnas närvarande i alla delar av Sverige, och partiprogrammet att tillgången till statlig service ska säkras i hela landet. Motförslagets krav på utbyggda servicekontor med regionalt perspektiv följer därmed direkt av planen. Planen bejakar samtidigt digital tillgänglighet, men det ersätter inte åtagandet om fysisk statlig närvaro.
- state presence throughout the countrydecisive»Vägnätet ska fungera och statliga myndigheter ska finnas närvarande i alla delar av Sverige.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The road network shall function and state agencies shall be present in all parts of Sweden.”
- state services throughout the country»Tillgången till statlig service ska säkras i hela landet.« (party programme ↗)“Access to state services shall be secured throughout the country.”
- digital accessibility»som till en rimlig kostnad kan göras digitalt tillgängliga också ska göras digitalt tillgängliga.« (party programme ↗)“which can be made digitally accessible at reasonable cost shall also be made digitally accessible.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The election manifesto explicitly promises to establish more state service offices so people shall feel security throughout the country, which is the direct opposite of closing 35 offices.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto explicitly promises to establish more state service offices so people shall feel security throughout the country, which is the direct opposite of closing 35 offices. The plan further places on the state responsibility that state service be accessible throughout Sweden and has as goal that the whole country shall live. The counter-proposal's requirement for expansion and regional perspective in location decisions follow directly from this.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet lovar uttryckligen att inrätta fler statliga servicekontor för att människor ska känna trygghet i hela landet, vilket är raka motsatsen till nedläggning av 35 kontor. Planen lägger dessutom på staten ett ansvar för att den statliga servicen är tillgänglig i hela Sverige och har som mål att hela Sverige ska leva. Motförslagets krav på utbyggnad och regionalt perspektiv i lokaliseringsbeslut följer direkt av detta.
- more state service officesdecisive»Fler poliser med lokal närvaro, utbyggd primärvård, enklare starta lokal läkarmottagning och inrätta fler statliga servicekontor.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“More police with local presence, expanded primary care, easier to start local medical practices and establish more state service offices.”
- state service throughout the country»Samtidigt har staten ansvar för att den statliga servicen är tillgänglig i hela Sverige.« (party programme ↗)“At the same time the state has responsibility that state service be accessible throughout Sweden.”
- the whole country shall live»Målet är att hela Sverige ska leva och att varje kommun och region ska vara ett fungerande« (party programme ↗)“The goal is that the whole country shall live and that every municipality and region shall be a functioning”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan's line for the state administration is efficiency and streamlining: state expenses shall decrease, an efficiency office shall examine all agencies' finances and assignments shall be streamlined.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's line for the state administration is efficiency and streamlining: state expenses shall decrease, an efficiency office shall examine all agencies' finances and assignments shall be streamlined. To instead expand the service centre network, reopen closed offices and link more activities to them is a spending increase that the plan does not commit to. The plan's ambition that the whole of Sweden shall function does indeed pull the other way, but does not bear the demand.
Original (Swedish)
Planens linje för statsförvaltningen är effektivisering och renodling: statens utgifter ska minska, ett effektiviseringskansli ska gå igenom alla myndigheters ekonomi och uppdrag ska renodlas. Att i stället bygga ut servicekontorsnätet, öppna nedlagda kontor igen och koppla fler verksamheter till dem är en utgiftsökning som planen inte åtar sig. Planens ambition att hela Sverige ska fungera drar visserligen åt andra hållet, men bär inte kravet.
- streamline agenciesdecisive»Inrätta ett effektiviseringskansli som ska gå inom alla myndigheters ekonomi för att frigöra resurser till försvaret« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Establish an efficiency office that shall examine all agencies' finances to free up resources for defence”
- decreased state spending»Statens utgifter ska minska – vi ska stoppa slöseriet med skattepengar« (2022 manifesto ↗)“State expenses shall decrease – we shall stop waste of tax money”
- prioritise core tasks»Politiken har en viktig uppgift att prioritera och välja bort,« (party programme ↗)“Policy has an important task to prioritise and make choices,”
- service across the country»Men ska det gå att bo och verka i hela Sverige måste också hela Sverige fungera.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“But for it to work to live and work in the whole of Sweden the whole of Sweden must also function.”
The plan states as a fundamental problem that public service has been dismantled in rural areas and in large parts of the country, and establishes the principle that all of Sweden shall live.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan states as a fundamental problem that public service has been dismantled in rural areas and in large parts of the country, and establishes the principle that all of Sweden shall live. It also wants to relocate more government jobs to smaller towns. Expanding the service centres instead of closing them, with a regional perspective in location decisions, therefore aligns with the plan even though the service centres are not mentioned.
Original (Swedish)
Planen anför som ett grundproblem att offentlig service monterats ned på landsbygden och i stora delar av landet, och slår fast principen att hela Sverige ska leva. Den vill dessutom utlokalisera fler myndighetsjobb till mindre orter. Att bygga ut servicekontoren i stället för att stänga dem, med regionalt perspektiv i lokaliseringsbesluten, ligger därför i linje med planen även om servicekontoren inte nämns.
- stop dismantled rural servicesdecisive»Skolresultaten har sjunkit, köerna till sjukvården har vuxit, polisen kommer allt mer sällan till den som utsatts för vardagsbrott och offentlig service har monterats ned på landsbygd och i stora delar av landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“School results have fallen, queues for healthcare have grown, police increasingly rarely come to those who have been victims of everyday crime and public service has been dismantled in rural areas and in large parts of the country.”
- all of Sweden shall live»Principen om att hela Sverige skall leva är mycket viktig för Sverigedemokraterna.« (party programme ↗)“The principle that all of Sweden shall live is very important to Sweden Democrats.”
- state presence in smaller towns»Sverigedemokraterna ser potential för att utlokalisera fler myndighetsjobb till mindre orter« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden Democrats see potential to relocate more government jobs to smaller towns”
- policy for the whole country»Bedriva en politik för hela Sverige« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Conduct a policy for all of Sweden”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2025/26:KU29)
- Committee report full text (HD01KU29)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2025/26:100 — Antikorruptionsmyndighet under riksdagen av Josef Fransson (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:1267 — Säkerställande av statlig service i hela landet av Louise Thunström m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1278 — Begränsning av rätten till tolk av Josefin Malmqvist (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1427 — Politisk påverkan från statliga myndigheter av Sten Bergheden (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1432 — Konsekvensanalys för funktionshindersperspektiv av Markus Selin (S)
- Motion 2025/26:147 — Ledamotsrum på landets länsstyrelser av Eric Palmqvist (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:1530 — Förstärkt tjänstemannaansvar och transparens vid implementering av EU-regler av Emma Ahlström Köster m.fl. (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1564 — Tjänstemannaansvar av Larry Söder (KD)
- Motion 2025/26:1602 — Sverige behöver en avregleringsminister av Cecilia Rönn (L)
- Motion 2025/26:1631 — Stärkt rättssäkerhet och likvärdigt stöd för döva av Jessica Rodén och Louise Thunström (båda S)
- Motion 2025/26:1700 — Precisering av proportionalitetsprincipens tillämpning i förvaltningslagen av Staffan Eklöf (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:1731 — Effektiviseringsfunktion inom Regeringskansliet av Jan Ericson (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1744 — Myndigheters opinionsbildning av Jan Ericson m.fl. (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1763 — Tydliga myndighetsbeslut av Jan Ericson (M)
- Motion 2025/26:18 — Ett civilsamhälle skilt från staten av Josef Fransson (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:1839 — Justitiekanslerns resurser av Isak From och Anna-Caren Sätherberg (båda S)
- Motion 2025/26:1874 — Anmälningsplikt för medlemskap i ordenssällskap och hemliga sällskap av Tomas Kronståhl m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1946 — Demokratisk infrastruktur av Mikael Dahlqvist (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1967 — Borttagande av åldersgräns för landshövdingar av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2029 — Enklare för personer med nedsatt syn av Sten Bergheden (M)
Source: The Swedish Parliament