2026-04-012025/26:KU29 · p.5KUConstitution
County administrative boards
The role of the county administrative boards and cooperation with government agencies
What's at stake: How well the county administrative boards can coordinate the efforts of government agencies within the counties affects work on matters including crisis preparedness, civil defence and total defence, as well as the ability of municipalities and regions to have regional circumstances taken into account in national policy.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether other government agencies should be placed under an explicit duty to cooperate with the county administrative boards to strengthen their coordinating role in the counties, or whether it is enough for the government to continue developing its governance of the boards as planned.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee stresses that the county administrative boards have an important role in coordinating the efforts of government agencies and that the government's governance needs to create good conditions for their cooperation and dialogue with municipalities and regions. It notes that the government intends to continue developing its governance of the boards, including by clarifying their role at the regional level and reviewing whether tasks should be streamlined vis-a-vis other agencies, and assumes that the relevant agencies will cooperate with the boards. Against that background the committee considers that parliament need not take any action, and the motions are rejected.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 3 (S)
The reservation (S) stresses that Sweden's 21 county administrative boards are central to effective state administration and should work to ensure that national goals are implemented in the counties with regard to regional circumstances, not least within crisis preparedness, civil defence and total defence. It demands that the boards' mandate to coordinate government agencies be complemented by an explicit duty for those agencies to cooperate, so that the boards can genuinely function as a unifying force in the counties.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 3 by S.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
What each plan points to — and how the party voted
For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| Plan | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Yes 17/0/0/5 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| S | No | No 0/90/0/16 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| MP | No | Yes 15/0/0/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| C | No | Yes 19/0/0/5 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| L | No | Yes 12/0/0/4 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| KD | No | Yes 16/0/0/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| M | No | Yes 55/0/0/11 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| SD | No | Yes 59/0/0/11 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2025/26:147 by Eric Palmqvist (SD), 2025/26:1967 by Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M), 2025/26:2150 by Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M), 2025/26:2195 by Sten Bergheden (M), 2025/26:2360 by Sten Bergheden (M) and 2025/26:3721 by Jennie Nilsson et al. (S) amendment 12.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2025/26:147 av Eric Palmqvist (SD), 2025/26:1967 av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M), 2025/26:2150 av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M), 2025/26:2195 av Sten Bergheden (M), 2025/26:2360 av Sten Bergheden (M) och 2025/26:3721 av Jennie Nilsson m.fl. (S) yrkande 12.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag rejected 53 proposals in motions on public administration from the general motion period 2025. The proposals concern, among other things, corruption, transfer of administrative tasks, local state services, the Ombudsman (Justitiekanslern), county administrative boards, activism by authorities and opinion-forming activities. The Riksdag refers, among other things, to measures already taken and ongoing work.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to develop service centers, reopen closed centers, and connect more services to them with a regional perspective. (S) — Reservation 3
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan says nothing about the governance of county administrative boards, but the nearest principle is that school, healthcare, care and other services should function everywhere and that society should exist everywhere regardless of where in the country you live.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan says nothing about the governance of county administrative boards, but the nearest principle is that school, healthcare, care and other services should function everywhere and that society should exist everywhere regardless of where in the country you live. An explicit mandate to government agencies to cooperate with county administrative boards is a means for national goals to reach throughout the country. The plan also wants to see a total defence with broad capacity to meet crises, which the counter-proposal refers to.
Original (Swedish)
Planen säger inget om styrningen av länsstyrelserna, men den närmast liggande principen är att skola, vård, omsorg och annan service ska fungera överallt och att samhället ska finnas där oavsett var i landet man bor. Ett uttryckligt uppdrag till statliga myndigheter att samverka med länsstyrelserna är ett medel för att nationella mål ska nå ut i hela landet. Planen vill också se ett totalförsvar med bred förmåga att möta kriser, vilket motförslaget knyter an till.
- public services throughout the countrydecisive»Skola, vård, omsorg och annan service behöver fungera överallt.« (party programme ↗)“School, healthcare, care and other services need to function everywhere.”
- municipal self-government»Det kommunala självstyret är en betydelsefull del av den svenska« (party programme ↗)“The local self-government is an important part of the Swedish”
- broad total defence against crises»Vi vill se ett modernt totalförsvar byggt på allmän värnplikt, med en« (party programme ↗)“We want to see a modern total defence built on general military service, with a”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan requires that civil defence and crisis preparedness be strengthened and that the state is present throughout the country with equivalent conditions.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that civil defence and crisis preparedness be strengthened and that the state is present throughout the country with equivalent conditions. An explicit mandate for state agencies to cooperate with county administrative boards is a means for that coordination, in line with the plan's requirement to tear down barriers between authorities. The plan does not address county administrative board instructions, however.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att det civila försvaret och krisberedskapen rustas upp och att staten är närvarande i hela landet med likvärdiga förutsättningar. Ett uttryckligt uppdrag till statliga myndigheter att samverka med länsstyrelserna är ett medel för den samordningen, i linje med planens krav på att riva hinder mellan myndigheter. Planen nämner dock inte länsstyrelsernas instruktioner.
- strengthened civil defencedecisive»Rusta upp det civila försvaret.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strengthen civil defence.”
- state responsibility throughout the country»Större statligt ansvar för likvärdiga förutsättningar i hela Sverige.« (party programme ↗)“Greater state responsibility for equivalent conditions throughout Sweden.”
- removed barriers for authority cooperation»Sekretesshinder mellan myndigheter ska rivas så att polisen och andra yrkesgrupper kan göra sitt jobb.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Secrecy barriers between authorities shall be torn down so that police and other professional groups can do their job.”
- preparedness for hybrid threats»Beredskap mot hybridattacker.« (party programme ↗)“Preparedness for hybrid attacks.”
The plan requires strengthened civil defence and increased appropriations for crisis preparedness and that public services and institutions are present across the entire country.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires strengthened civil defence and increased appropriations for crisis preparedness and that public services and institutions are present across the entire country. It also emphasizes that decisions shall be taken as close to those affected as possible. An explicit mandate to state agencies to collaborate with county administrative boards is a means for coordinated regional crisis preparedness and state presence, which aligns with the plan. The question of agency management is however not directly addressed.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver ett stärkt civilt försvar och ökade anslag till krisberedskap samt att samhällsservice och institutioner finns närvarande i hela landet. Den betonar också att beslut ska tas så nära de berörda som möjligt. Ett uttryckligt uppdrag till statliga myndigheter att samverka med länsstyrelserna är ett medel för samordnad regional krisberedskap och statlig närvaro, vilket ligger i linje med planen. Frågan om myndighetsstyrning behandlas dock inte direkt.
- strengthened civil defencedecisive»satsa en större andel av försvarets pengar på det civila försvaret, och öka anslagen till krisberedskap.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“allocate a larger share of defence funding to civil defence and increase appropriations for crisis preparedness.”
- public services across the country»delar av landet ska leva, och att samhället ska säkerställa att samhällsservice ska finnas« (party programme ↗)“areas of the country shall live, and that society shall ensure that public services exist”
- decisions close to those affected»Därför bör beslut tas så nära människor som möjligt« (party programme ↗)“Therefore decisions should be taken as close to people as possible”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan requires that state authorities cooperate and points out that the presence and understanding of state authorities for people's life situations has diminished in parts of the country.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that state authorities cooperate and points out that the presence and understanding of state authorities for people's life situations has diminished in parts of the country. An explicit cooperation mandate that makes the county administrative boards a unifying force in the counties is in line with that, as is the commitment to strengthen civil defence and society's preparedness. The plan does not however address the governance of county administrative boards themselves, hence the derivation.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att statliga myndigheter samverkar och pekar på att myndigheternas närvaro och förståelse för människors livssituation minskat i delar av landet. Ett uttryckligt samverkansuppdrag som gör länsstyrelserna till en samlande kraft i länen ligger i linje med det, liksom med åtagandet att rusta civilförsvaret och samhällets beredskap. Planen behandlar dock inte länsstyrelsernas styrning i sig, därav härledning.
- authorities shall cooperatedecisive»Statliga myndigheter måste samverka och arbeta marksnålt när man tar ny mark i anspråk för väg, tåg, el, etc.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“State authorities must cooperate and work pragmatically when taking new land into use for roads, railways, electricity, etc.”
- strengthen civil preparedness»Även det civila försvaret är livsviktigt. Vi måste rusta civilförsvaret och samhällets beredskap inför krig och kris.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Civil defence is also vital. We must strengthen civil defence and society's preparedness for war and crisis.”
- state presence throughout the country»På många håll har myndigheters närvaro och förståelse för människors livssituation minskat, vilket leder till lägre tillit.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“In many places the presence and understanding of state authorities for people's life situations has diminished, which leads to lower trust.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan states that access to state services shall be secured throughout the country and that state agencies shall be present in all parts of Sweden, and it presumes that agencies can efficiently collaborate and share information.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan states that access to state services shall be secured throughout the country and that state agencies shall be present in all parts of Sweden, and it presumes that agencies can efficiently collaborate and share information. An explicit mandate for state agencies to collaborate with county administrative boards follows from that line, particularly when the plan wants to strengthen total defence and civil defence. However, the plan does not take a position on county administrative boards' mandate as such.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att tillgången till statlig service ska säkras i hela landet och att statliga myndigheter ska finnas närvarande i alla delar av Sverige, och den förutsätter att myndigheter effektivt kan samverka och dela information. Ett uttryckligt uppdrag till statliga myndigheter att samverka med länsstyrelserna följer av den linjen, särskilt när planen vill stärka totalförsvaret och det civila försvaret. Planen tar dock inte ställning till länsstyrelsernas uppdrag som sådant.
- state services throughout the countrydecisive»Tillgången till statlig service ska säkras i hela landet.« (party programme ↗)“Access to state services shall be secured throughout the country.”
- efficient inter-agency collaboration»att myndigheter effektivt kan dela information med varandra« (party programme ↗)“that agencies can efficiently share information with each other”
- strengthened civil defence»det civila försvaret stärkas i samma takt som det militära« (2022 manifesto ↗)“civil defence is strengthened at the same pace as the military”
- state presence throughout the country»Vägnätet ska fungera och statliga myndigheter ska finnas närvarande i alla delar av Sverige.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The road network shall function and state agencies shall be present in all parts of Sweden.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan says nothing about the county administrative boards, but it places on the state responsibility that state service be accessible throughout Sweden and requires that crises be met with all preventive means of policy and that total defence have readiness for disasters.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan says nothing about the county administrative boards, but it places on the state responsibility that state service be accessible throughout Sweden and requires that crises be met with all preventive means of policy and that total defence have readiness for disasters. An explicit cooperation mandate for state authorities in the counties realizes this and accords with the idea of subsidiarity about the right power in the right place. The conclusion is derived from general principles.
Original (Swedish)
Planen säger inget om länsstyrelserna, men den ålägger staten ansvar för att den statliga servicen är tillgänglig i hela Sverige och kräver att kriser möts med politikens alla preventiva möjligheter och att totalförsvaret har beredskap för katastrofer. Ett uttryckligt samverkansuppdrag till statliga myndigheter i länen förverkligar detta och stämmer med subsidiaritetens tanke om rätt makt på rätt plats. Slutsatsen är härledd ur allmänna principer.
- state service throughout the countrydecisive»Samtidigt har staten ansvar för att den statliga servicen är tillgänglig i hela Sverige.« (party programme ↗)“At the same time the state has responsibility that state service be accessible throughout Sweden.”
- preventive crisis readiness»Kriser måste mötas med politikens alla preventiva möjligheter.« (party programme ↗)“Crises must be met with all preventive means of policy.”
- the right power in the right place»Rätt makt på rätt plats, det är den kristdemokratiska subsidiaritetsprincipens innebörd.« (party programme ↗)“The right power in the right place, that is the meaning of the Christian democratic subsidiarity principle.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan establishes that security presupposes strong civil defence and good crisis preparedness, and promises long-term planning for civil defence as well as a national security council that coordinates.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that security presupposes strong civil defence and good crisis preparedness, and promises long-term planning for civil defence as well as a national security council that coordinates. An explicit mandate to state agencies to cooperate with regional administrative authorities in crisis and total defence fulfils precisely that coordination thought without expanding the state. The plan, however, does not address regional administrative authorities as such.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att tryggheten förutsätter ett starkt civilförsvar och god krisberedskap, och lovar en långsiktig planering för det civila försvaret samt ett nationellt säkerhetsråd som samordnar. Ett uttryckligt uppdrag till statliga myndigheter att samverka med länsstyrelserna inom kris och totalförsvar fullföljer just den samordningstanken utan att bygga ut staten. Planen talar dock inte om länsstyrelserna som sådana.
- long-term civil defencedecisive»Säkra en långsiktig planering för det civila försvaret« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Secure long-term planning for civil defence”
- strong civil defence»Tryggheten i Sverige förutsätter också ett starkt civilförsvar« (party programme ↗)“Security in Sweden also presupposes strong civil defence”
- coordination of security work»Inrätta ett nationellt säkerhetsråd på Statsrådsberedningen« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Establish a national security council at the Prime Minister's Office”
- action plan against hybrid threats»Införa en handlingsplan med konkreta åtgärder mot hybridhot och cyberattacker« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Introduce an action plan with concrete measures against hybrid threats and cyber-attacks”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan wants special legislation to be drawn up for how a crisis organization can effectively coordinate society's efforts and that crisis management capability is strengthened at authorities, regions and municipalities.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants special legislation to be drawn up for how a crisis organization can effectively coordinate society's efforts and that crisis management capability is strengthened at authorities, regions and municipalities. The counter-proposal's demand that county administrative boards' coordination mandate is complemented with an explicit duty to cooperate for state authorities is a means for precisely the coordination the plan calls for. The plan does not mention county administrative boards, so the coverage is derived.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill att särskild lagstiftning tas fram för hur en krisorganisation effektivt ska kunna samordna samhällets insatser och att krisledningsförmågan stärks vid myndigheter, regioner och kommuner. Motförslagets krav på att länsstyrelsernas samordningsuppdrag kompletteras med en uttrycklig samverkansskyldighet för statliga myndigheter är ett medel för just den samordning planen efterlyser. Planen nämner inte länsstyrelserna, varför täckningen är härledd.
- legislative crisis coordinationdecisive»Särskild lagstiftning bör tas fram för hur en krisorganisation effektivt ska kunna samordna samhällets insatser vid en kris och hur undantagsåtgärder snabbt ska kunna sättas in av det allmänna.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Special legislation should be drawn up for how a crisis organization can effectively coordinate society's efforts in a crisis and how extraordinary measures can quickly be implemented by the public sector.”
- strengthened crisis management at all levels»Den operativa krisledningsförmågan behöver stärkas på Regeringskansliet och vid landets myndigheter, regioner och kommuner.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The operational crisis management capability needs to be strengthened at the Government Offices and at the country's authorities, regions and municipalities.”
- central crisis management capability»Förbättra den centrala krisledningsförmågan« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Improve central crisis management capability”
- streamlined agency mandates»Sverigedemokraterna vill också slå samman myndigheter och renodla offentliga verksamheter där det är möjligt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden Democrats also want to merge authorities and streamline public operations where possible.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2025/26:KU29)
- Committee report full text (HD01KU29)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2025/26:100 — Antikorruptionsmyndighet under riksdagen av Josef Fransson (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:1267 — Säkerställande av statlig service i hela landet av Louise Thunström m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1278 — Begränsning av rätten till tolk av Josefin Malmqvist (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1427 — Politisk påverkan från statliga myndigheter av Sten Bergheden (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1432 — Konsekvensanalys för funktionshindersperspektiv av Markus Selin (S)
- Motion 2025/26:147 — Ledamotsrum på landets länsstyrelser av Eric Palmqvist (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:1530 — Förstärkt tjänstemannaansvar och transparens vid implementering av EU-regler av Emma Ahlström Köster m.fl. (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1564 — Tjänstemannaansvar av Larry Söder (KD)
- Motion 2025/26:1602 — Sverige behöver en avregleringsminister av Cecilia Rönn (L)
- Motion 2025/26:1631 — Stärkt rättssäkerhet och likvärdigt stöd för döva av Jessica Rodén och Louise Thunström (båda S)
- Motion 2025/26:1700 — Precisering av proportionalitetsprincipens tillämpning i förvaltningslagen av Staffan Eklöf (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:1731 — Effektiviseringsfunktion inom Regeringskansliet av Jan Ericson (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1744 — Myndigheters opinionsbildning av Jan Ericson m.fl. (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1763 — Tydliga myndighetsbeslut av Jan Ericson (M)
- Motion 2025/26:18 — Ett civilsamhälle skilt från staten av Josef Fransson (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:1839 — Justitiekanslerns resurser av Isak From och Anna-Caren Sätherberg (båda S)
- Motion 2025/26:1874 — Anmälningsplikt för medlemskap i ordenssällskap och hemliga sällskap av Tomas Kronståhl m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1946 — Demokratisk infrastruktur av Mikael Dahlqvist (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1967 — Borttagande av åldersgräns för landshövdingar av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2029 — Enklare för personer med nedsatt syn av Sten Bergheden (M)
Source: The Swedish Parliament