2024-02-072023/24:NU4 · p.13NUBusiness & energy
AB Svensk Bilprovning
AB Svensk Bilprovning's public mandate and ownership
What's at stake: The issue affects whether vehicle inspection, including mobile inspection in rural areas, remains available nationwide, or whether commercial operation and a possible sale of the company are allowed to determine what services are offered.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the government should refrain from selling AB Svensk Bilprovning and instead consider giving it a public-service mandate or re-regulating the inspection business, or whether the existing authorisation to divest the company should remain unchanged.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee rejects the motions and sees no reason at this time to limit the government's authorisation to divest AB Svensk Bilprovning or to give the company a new public-service mandate.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 21 (S)
The reservation (S) wants the government to refrain from selling AB Svensk Bilprovning and instead consider whether the company should be given a public-service mandate or the inspection business re-regulated, pointing out that the company discontinued mobile inspection serving seven rural locations for over 15 years, and that inspection is an important service linked to societal safety requirements.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 21 by S.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have held
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: VVänsterpartiet
Ja 189–89Ja 171–107
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Yes 18/0/0/6 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| S | No | No 0/89/0/18 | match | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| MP | No | Yes 11/0/0/7 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| C | Yes | Yes 20/0/0/4 | match | confidence: low | not addressed |
| L | Yes | Yes 11/0/0/5 | match | confidence: medium | derived |
| KD | Yes | Yes 12/0/0/7 | match | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| M | Yes | Yes 55/0/0/13 | match | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| SD | No | Yes 62/0/0/10 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2023/24:150 by Magnus Jacobsson (KD), 2023/24:2537 by Markus Wiechel and Alexander Christiansson (both SD) point 2 and 2023/24:2683 by Fredrik Olovsson et al. (S) point 4.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2023/24:150 av Magnus Jacobsson (KD), 2023/24:2537 av Markus Wiechel och Alexander Christiansson (båda SD) yrkande 2 och 2023/24:2683 av Fredrik Olovsson m.fl. (S) yrkande 4.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag has addressed the government's letter on the 2023 annual report on state-owned enterprises. The Riksdag emphasizes the importance of the annually recurring letter and stresses the importance of the government continuing to develop its content so that the Riksdag gets a good picture of developments in state-owned enterprises. The Riksdag said no to approximately 60 proposals in motions on, among other things, state ownership and management of enterprises, submitted during the general motion period 2023. The Riksdag thus filed the letter with the records, that is, concluded the matter.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to ensure that board members in state-owned companies have knowledge of climate transition. (S) — Reservation 21
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan requires that the share of collectively owned enterprises in the economy increases, that privatised socially important activities are taken back and that services should exist also in smaller towns.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that the share of collectively owned enterprises in the economy increases, that privatised socially important activities are taken back and that services should exist also in smaller towns. Refraining from selling the company and instead considering a public mandate or re-regulation of inspection follows directly from these commitments, especially when mobile inspection in rural areas has been discontinued. The plan also requires a regional policy that reduces the gaps.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att de gemensamt ägda företagens andel av ekonomin ökar, att privatiserad samhällsviktig verksamhet tas tillbaka och att service ska finnas också på mindre orter. Att avstå från att sälja bolaget och i stället överväga ett samhällsuppdrag eller återreglering av besiktningen följer direkt av dessa åtaganden, särskilt när den mobila besiktningen på landsbygden lagts ned. Planen kräver också en regionalpolitik som minskar klyftorna.
- increase collective ownershipdecisive»utnyttjas fullt ut. De gemensamt ägda företagens andel av ekonomin« (party programme ↗)“is fully utilised. The share of collectively owned enterprises in the economy”
- reclaim privatised activities»Det är hög tid att agera och ta tillbaka den samhällsviktiga verksamhet och infrastruktur som har privatiserats.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It is high time to act and take back the socially important activities and infrastructure that have been privatised.”
- services in smaller towns»Äldreomsorg, förskola, skola och matbutik behöver finnas på fler mindre orter.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Elderly care, preschool, school and grocery stores need to exist in more small towns.”
- reduce regional gaps»Regionalpolitiken ska därför drivas för att minska klyftorna.« (party programme ↗)“Regional policy should therefore be pursued to reduce the gaps.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan wants society to retake control and the state to be present throughout the country, based on the principle that the whole country shall be able to live and develop.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants society to retake control and the state to be present throughout the country, based on the principle that the whole country shall be able to live and develop. To refrain from selling the company and instead consider a public mission or re-regulation of the inspection service responds to this, particularly when services in rural areas have been withdrawn. The plan does not address vehicle testing in itself, but its line against continued privatizations is clear.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill att samhället tar tillbaka kontrollen och att staten finns närvarande i hela landet, med utgångspunkt i att hela landet ska kunna leva och utvecklas. Att avstå från att sälja bolaget och i stället överväga ett samhällsuppdrag eller återreglering av besiktningsverksamheten svarar mot detta, särskilt när servicen på landsbygden dragits in. Planen behandlar inte bilprovning i sig, men dess linje mot fortsatta utförsäljningar är tydlig.
- samhället tar tillbaka kontrollendecisive»Samhället ska flytta fram positionerna för att ta tillbaka kontrollen över utvecklingen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Society shall move forward positions to retake control over development.”
- statlig närvaro i hela landet»Staten ska finnas närvarande i hela landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The state shall be present throughout the country.”
- hela landet ska leva»Alla har ett gemensamt intresse av att hela landet kan leva och utvecklas.« (party programme ↗)“Everyone has a common interest in the whole country being able to live and develop.”
- demokratins företräde före marknaden»Demokratin har därför företräde före marknaden.« (party programme ↗)“Democracy therefore takes priority before the market.”
The party programme establishes that in certain cases there are reasons for the state to own and operate business activities and that such ownership shall be active, and that public services shall be available across the entire country with good local service in rural areas.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme establishes that in certain cases there are reasons for the state to own and operate business activities and that such ownership shall be active, and that public services shall be available across the entire country with good local service in rural areas. That the mobile inspection service has been closed down affects precisely that availability. To refrain from sale and instead consider a public service assignment or re-regulation therefore aligns with the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet slår fast att det i vissa fall finns skäl för staten att äga och driva affärsverksamhet och att ägarskapet då ska vara aktivt, samt att samhällsfunktioner ska finnas tillgängliga över hela landet med god närservice på landsbygden. Att den mobila besiktningen lagts ned drabbar just den tillgängligheten. Att avstå från försäljning och i stället överväga samhällsuppdrag eller återreglering ligger därför i linje med planen.
- state ownership can be justifieddecisive»I vissa fall kan det dock finnas skäl för staten« (party programme ↗)“In certain cases there may indeed be reasons for the state”
- public service across the country»Samhällsfunktioner som polis, arbetsförmedling och« (party programme ↗)“Public services such as police, employment service and”
- local service in rural areas»God närservice, informationsteknik,« (party programme ↗)“Good local service, information technology,”
- active state ownership»ska ägarskapet vara aktivt och inflytandet« (party programme ↗)“shall ownership be active and the influence”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The party programme demands a market economy free from centrally planned direction and sees competitive tendering as an advantage, and the election manifesto wants to clear away unnecessary regulations.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme demands a market economy free from centrally planned direction and sees competitive tendering as an advantage, and the election manifesto wants to clear away unnecessary regulations. To halt a sale and consider re-regulation of inspection activities goes against that line. The plan's requirement for close and reliable service throughout the country pulls in the opposite direction, making the assessment uncertain.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet kräver en marknadsekonomi fri från planekonomiska pekpinnar och ser konkurrensutsättning som en fördel, och valmanifestet vill rensa upp bland överflödiga regler. Att stoppa en försäljning och överväga återreglering av besiktningsverksamheten går emot den linjen. Planens krav på nära och pålitlig service i hela landet drar åt motsatt håll, vilket gör bedömningen osäker.
- competitively tender public servicesdecisive»Offentlig verksamhet kan med fördel konkurrensutsättas« (party programme ↗)“Public services may advantageously be subject to competitive tendering”
- fewer regulations»Vi ska rensa upp bland överflödiga regler och byråkrati.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We shall clear away unnecessary regulations and bureaucracy.”
- service throughout the country»Offentlig service ska vara nära och pålitlig i hela landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Public services shall be close and reliable throughout the country.”
flags: citat_blockerat
The plan allows state enterprises only in the presence of a strong public interest and states that the public sector shall not run activities that crowd out functioning private alternatives.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan allows state enterprises only in the presence of a strong public interest and states that the public sector shall not run activities that crowd out functioning private alternatives. The counter-proposal's requirement to avoid sale and consider public service commissions or re-regulation of inspection services goes against this. The plan's requirement for a functioning road network and state presence throughout the country supports the rural argument but not state ownership as a means.
Original (Swedish)
Planen tillåter statligt företagande endast vid ett starkt samhällsintresse och slår fast att det offentliga inte ska driva verksamhet som tränger ut fungerande privata alternativ. Motförslagets krav på att undvika försäljning och överväga samhällsuppdrag eller återreglering av besiktningsverksamheten går emot detta. Planens krav på fungerande vägnät och statlig närvaro i hela landet stöder landsbygdsargumentet men inte statligt ägande som medel.
- restrictive state enterprisedecisive»Det offentliga ska endast driva affärsverksamhet om det finns ett starkt samhällsintresse.« (party programme ↗)“The public sector shall only run business activities if there is a strong public interest.”
- not crowd out private alternatives»offentliga ska inte driva verksamheter som tränger ut fungerande privata alternativ eller försvårar« (party programme ↗)“the public shall not run activities that crowd out functioning private alternatives or complicate”
- the state shall not own enterprises»Staten ska inte äga flygbolag, banker och telebolag.« (party programme ↗)“The state shall not own airlines, banks and telecommunications companies.”
- services throughout the country»Vägnätet ska fungera och statliga myndigheter ska finnas närvarande i alla delar av Sverige.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The road network shall function and state agencies shall be present in all parts of Sweden.”
The plan establishes that monopolies and competitive restrictions shall occur only exceptionally and that effective competition policy shall counter monopolies, and that personal ownership shall be encouraged over institutional.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that monopolies and competitive restrictions shall occur only exceptionally and that effective competition policy shall counter monopolies, and that personal ownership shall be encouraged over institutional. The counter-proposal wants to avoid sale and reconsider regulation of inspections, which goes against this. The plan's care for public service in the countryside motivates presence but not state ownership or re-regulation.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att monopol och konkurrensbegränsningar endast får förekomma undantagsvis och att en effektiv konkurrenspolitik ska motverka monopol, samt att personligt ägande ska uppmuntras framför institutionellt. Motförslaget vill undvika försäljning och överväga återreglering av besiktningen, vilket går emot detta. Planens omsorg om samhällsservice på landsbygden motiverar närvaro men inte statligt ägande eller återreglering.
- monopolies only exceptionallydecisive»Monopol och konkurrensbegränsningar får endast förekomma undantagsvis,« (party programme ↗)“Monopolies and competitive restrictions shall occur only exceptionally,”
- effective competition policy»effektiv konkurrenspolitik motverkar oligopol, monopol och illojal konkurrens.« (party programme ↗)“effective competition policy counters oligopolies, monopolies and unfair competition.”
- personal over institutional ownership»Det är också angeläget att det personliga ägandet uppmuntras på bekostnad av det institutionella ägandet.« (party programme ↗)“It is also important that personal ownership be encouraged at the expense of institutional ownership.”
- public service in the countryside»Fler poliser med lokal närvaro, utbyggd primärvård, enklare starta lokal läkarmottagning och inrätta fler statliga servicekontor.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“More police with local presence, expanded primary care, easier to start local medical practices and establish more state service offices.”
The plan establishes that what can be done equally well or better by others should not be performed by the public and wants to reduce state ownership.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that what can be done equally well or better by others should not be performed by the public and wants to reduce state ownership. The counter-proposal's demand to stop a sale and instead consider community assignments or re-regulation of inspection activities contradicts this line. That service shall function across the country is, however, an articulated ambition in the plan and pulls partly towards the counter-proposal's direction.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att det som kan göras lika bra eller bättre av andra inte ska utföras av det offentliga och vill minska statens ägande. Motförslagets krav på att stoppa en försäljning och i stället överväga samhällsuppdrag eller återreglering av besiktningsverksamheten strider mot denna linje. Att service ska fungera i hela landet är dock en uttalad ambition i planen och drar delvis åt motförslagets håll.
- limited public responsibilitydecisive»Om något kan göras lika bra eller bättre av« (party programme ↗)“If something can be done equally well or better by”
- market economy and private ownership»Grunden för Sveriges välstånd är en marknadsekonomi baserad« (party programme ↗)“The foundation for Sweden's prosperity is a market economy based”
- divest state ownership»Sälja av en större andel av statliga Sveaskogs innehav till personer med regional anknytning« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sell a larger share of state-owned Sveaskog holdings to people with regional connections”
- service across the country»Du ska kunna känna dig trygg med att välfärden fungerar oavsett var i landet du bor.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“You shall be able to feel secure that healthcare functions regardless of where in the country you live.”
The plan requires strong welfare and public services throughout the country and particularly points out that public service has been dismantled in rural areas as a problem to be reversed.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires strong welfare and public services throughout the country and particularly points out that public service has been dismantled in rural areas as a problem to be reversed. The counter-proposal's demand to avoid sales and instead consider a societal mission or re-regulation aims precisely to preserve vehicle inspection in smaller towns. This is in line with the plan's principle that all of Sweden shall live.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver en stark välfärd och samhällsservice i hela landet och pekar särskilt ut att offentlig service monterats ned på landsbygden som ett problem som ska vändas. Motförslagets krav att undvika försäljning och i stället överväga ett samhällsuppdrag eller återreglering syftar just till att bevara besiktning på mindre orter. Det ligger i linje med planens princip att hela Sverige ska leva.
- public services throughout the countrydecisive»Sverigedemokraterna vill satsa på en stark välfärd och samhällsservice i hela landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden Democrats want to invest in strong welfare and public services throughout the country.”
- dismantled rural services»Skolresultaten har sjunkit, köerna till sjukvården har vuxit, polisen kommer allt mer sällan till den som utsatts för vardagsbrott och offentlig service har monterats ned på landsbygd och i stora delar av landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“School results have fallen, queues for healthcare have grown, police increasingly rarely come to those who have been victims of everyday crime and public service has been dismantled in rural areas and in large parts of the country.”
- policy for all of Sweden»Bedriva en politik för hela Sverige« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Conduct a policy for all of Sweden”
- all of Sweden shall live»Principen om att hela Sverige skall leva är mycket viktig för Sverigedemokraterna.« (party programme ↗)“The principle that all of Sweden shall live is very important to Sweden Democrats.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2023/24:NU4)
- Committee report full text (HB01NU4)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2023/24:1123 — Opinionsbildande myndigheter och statliga bolag av Helena Storckenfeldt och Lars Püss (båda M)
- Motion 2023/24:1409 — Översyn av möjligheten att sälja fler statliga bolag av Carl Nordblom (M)
- Motion 2023/24:150 — Avyttring av statens ägande i AB Svensk Bilprovning av Magnus Jacobsson (KD)
- Motion 2023/24:1861 — De statliga bolagens medlemskap i Svenskt Näringsliv av Joakim Sandell m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2023/24:1877 — Statliga bolag för en hållbar utveckling av Elin Söderberg m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2023/24:1878 — För en framtidssäkrad hållbar svensk järnväg av Daniel Helldén m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2023/24:2005 — Utveckling av naturvårdsområdet Malingsbo-Kloten av Sofie Eriksson m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2023/24:2068 — Skogspolitik med helhetssyn av Mattias Eriksson Falk m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2023/24:2107 — Statens företag av Jesper Skalberg Karlsson och Louise Meijer (båda M)
- Motion 2023/24:2346 — En järnväg för framtiden av Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2023/24:2492 — En näringspolitik för tillväxt av Elisabeth Thand Ringqvist m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2023/24:2537 — Försäljning av statliga bolag av Markus Wiechel och Alexander Christiansson (båda SD)
- Motion 2023/24:2539 — Åtgärder för ett robust elsystem av Lars Engsund (M)
- Motion 2023/24:2683 — Statliga bolag av Fredrik Olovsson m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2023/24:294 — Försäljning eller avveckling av statliga bolag av Joar Forssell (L)
- Motion 2023/24:310 — Försäljning av SAS av Cecilia Rönn (L)
- Motion 2023/24:372 — Bevarande och utveckling av torvbruket av Martin Kinnunen m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2023/24:400 — En konkurrenskraftig svensk järnväg av Patrik Jönsson m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2023/24:415 — Post och it i hela landet av Jimmy Ståhl m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2023/24:444 — Statligt ägande av Tobias Andersson m.fl. (SD)
Source: The Swedish Parliament