2024-03-202023/24:MJU8 · p.3MJUEnvironment & agriculture

Measures to achieve climate goals

Measures to meet the climate targets within the reduction obligation

What's at stake: The decision affects whether Sweden meets its climate and transport-sector targets and EU commitments, and industry's and forestry's capacity to contribute to them - shaping the trade-off between household fuel costs and climate ambition.

Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.

What the vote decides

The question is whether the government's ongoing work is enough to reach the climate and transport targets, or whether the government should be required to clearly explain how it will meet the targets given lower reduction levels and an announced future phase-out of the obligation.

Yes Yes — the committee proposal

The committee rejects the motion, pointing to ongoing work - the government's climate action plan, an upcoming review of cost-effective policy instruments, and reviews of fuel environmental classification and a bioeconomy strategy - which it considers gives good conditions for continuing to work toward the climate targets without a separate report at this point.

No No — the reservations

Reservation 4 (S, C, MP)

The reservation (S, C, MP) is critical of the government having lowered the reduction levels while also announcing a phase-out of the reduction obligation by 2027, and questions how the climate targets - including the transport-sector milestone for 2030 and Sweden's commitments under the EU's Fit for 55 package - will be met when industry's and the forestry sector's capacity to contribute risks being weakened. The reservation demands that the government clearly explain to the public and affected industries how the targets will be met despite reduced investment in biofuels.

Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.

VSMPCLKDMSD
YesNoAbstainAbsent

What do the votes mean here?

Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).

No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 4 by S, C, MP.

Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.

What each plan points to — and how the party voted

For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.

PlanVoteConfidenceEvidence
VNoAbstain 0/0/18/6departs from the planconfidence: highderived
Sown reservationNoNo 0/91/0/15follows the planconfidence: highexplicit
MPown reservationNoNo 0/15/0/3follows the planconfidence: highexplicit
Cown reservationNoNo 0/21/0/3follows the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
LNoYes 11/0/0/5departs from the planconfidence: mediumderived
KDYesYes 15/0/0/4follows the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
MYesYes 58/0/0/10follows the planconfidence: lownot addressed
SDYesYes 62/0/0/10follows the planconfidence: highexplicit

Committee proposal

The Riksdag rejects motion 2023/24:2791 by Anna-Caren Sätherberg et al. (S) demand 3.

Original (Swedish)

Riksdagen avslår motion 2023/24:2791 av Anna-Caren Sätherberg m.fl. (S) yrkande 3.

Riksdag decision: The Riksdag has considered a government communication concerning the National Audit Office's examination of whether the reduction obligation contributes to achieving climate policy goals effectively or not. The National Audit Office examined the previous design of the reduction obligation, that is, before the decision was made to reduce and eliminate the reduction levels for petrol and diesel. The National Audit Office's overall conclusion is that the reduction obligation partially contributes to achieving climate policy goals effectively. The National Audit Office also made recommendations to the government and the Energy Agency. In its communication, the government agrees with the National Audit Office's findings that the reduction obligation can partially contribute to climate policy goals effectively, but that in its current form it is not feasible. With this, the Riksdag placed the government's communication in the records, that is, concluded the matter.

Counter-proposals

Plan vs actual vote

Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.

VVänsterpartietNoAbstaindeparts from the planderived

The plan requires strengthened governance based on new, tightened climate targets and that all political decisions take account of the acute climate crisis, with updated targets for all emissions that Swedish policy can influence.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan requires strengthened governance based on new, tightened climate targets and that all political decisions take account of the acute climate crisis, with updated targets for all emissions that Swedish policy can influence. A requirement for clear reporting of how climate targets will be achieved when investment in biofuels decreases is a direct application of that commitment. The plan also requires powerful economic instruments.

Original (Swedish)

Planen kräver stärkt styrning utifrån nya, skärpta klimatmål och att alla politiska beslut tar hänsyn till den akuta klimatkrisen, med uppdaterade mål för alla utsläpp som svensk politik kan påverka. Ett krav på tydlig redovisning av hur klimatmålen ska nås när satsningen på biodrivmedel minskar är en direkt tillämpning av det åtagandet. Planen kräver också kraftfulla ekonomiska styrmedel.

  • tightened climate targets and governancedecisive»Investeringar i grön teknik, industri och infrastruktur, utbyggd energikapacitet och stärkt styrning utifrån nya, skärpta klimatmål behövs.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Investments in green technology, industry and infrastructure, expanded energy capacity and strengthened governance based on new, tightened climate targets are needed.”
  • targets for all emissions»uppdaterade klimatmål för alla utsläpp som svensk politik har inflytande över« (2022 manifesto ↗)“updated climate targets for all emissions that Swedish policy has influence over”
  • climate considerations in all decisions»Omställningen behöver ske omgående och alla politiska beslut behöver ta hänsyn till den akuta kris som vi befinner oss i.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The transition needs to happen immediately and all political decisions need to take account of the acute crisis we find ourselves in.”
  • powerful instruments»Därför behövs en kraftfull lagstiftning, ekonomiska styrmedel, långsiktig samhällsplanering, klimatinvesteringar« (party programme ↗)“Therefore powerful legislation, economic instruments, long-term societal planning, climate investments are needed”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

SSocialdemokraternaNoNofollows the planexplicit

The election manifesto establishes that the climate policy framework shall remain fixed, that Sweden shall become the world's first fossil-free welfare nation and that there shall be no net emissions by 2045.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The election manifesto establishes that the climate policy framework shall remain fixed, that Sweden shall become the world's first fossil-free welfare nation and that there shall be no net emissions by 2045. The counter-proposal's requirement for clear reporting on how the goals shall be achieved when investment in biofuels decreases protects precisely these commitments. The plan furthermore wants to increase Swedish production of renewable fuels.

Original (Swedish)

Valmanifestet slår fast att det klimatpolitiska ramverket ska ligga fast, att Sverige ska bli världens första fossilfria välfärdsnation och att inga nettoutsläpp ska finnas 2045. Motförslagets krav på en tydlig redovisning av hur målen ska nås när satsningen på biodrivmedel minskar skyddar exakt dessa åtaganden. Planen vill dessutom öka den svenska produktionen av förnybara drivmedel.

  • the climate framework remains fixeddecisive»Det klimatpolitiska ramverket ska ligga fast.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The climate policy framework shall remain fixed.”
  • net zero emissions 2045»År 2045 ska Sverige inte ha några nettoutsläpp av växthusgaser till atmosfären, för att därefter uppnå negativa utsläpp.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“By 2045, Sweden shall have no net greenhouse gas emissions to the atmosphere, and thereafter shall achieve negative emissions.”
  • fossil-free welfare nation»Sverige ska bli världens första fossilfria välfärdsnation.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden shall become the world's first fossil-free welfare nation.”
  • renewable fuels»Vi vill öka den svenska produktionen av förnybara drivmedel, så att det blir lättare att tanka fossilfritt i Sverige.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to increase Swedish production of renewable fuels, so it becomes easier to refuel with fossil-free fuels in Sweden.”
MPMiljöpartietNoNofollows the planexplicit

The election manifesto commits to producing a Swedish emissions budget that achieves climate targets and a transition law for phasing out fossil fuels; the counter-proposal's demand for clear reporting of how targets will be met despite reduced biofuel investment is a direct consequence of that commitment.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The election manifesto commits to producing a Swedish emissions budget that achieves climate targets and a transition law for phasing out fossil fuels; the counter-proposal's demand for clear reporting of how targets will be met despite reduced biofuel investment is a direct consequence of that commitment. The plan also establishes that transport emissions must decrease to meet climate targets and that Sweden must lead in reducing climate impact. Lowering reduction levels without documented target fulfilment contradicts the plan.

Original (Swedish)

Valmanifestet åtar sig att ta fram en svensk utsläppsbudget som gör att klimatmålen nås och en omställningslag för utfasning av fossila bränslen; motförslagets krav på en tydlig redovisning av hur målen ska nås trots minskad biodrivmedelssatsning är en direkt följd av det åtagandet. Planen slår också fast att trafikens utsläpp måste minska för att klimatmålen ska klaras och att Sverige ska vara ledande i att minska klimatpåverkan. Att sänka reduktionsnivåerna utan redovisad måluppfyllelse strider mot planen.

  • emissions budget for target achievementdecisive»ta fram en svensk utsläppsbudget som gör att vi når klimatmålen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“produce a Swedish emissions budget that achieves our climate targets.”
  • law-driven fossil phase-out»införa en omställningslag så att all industri fasar ut kol, olja och fossilgas till senast 2030.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“introduce a transition law so that all industry phases out coal, oil and fossil gas by 2030 at the latest.”
  • reduced transport emissions»Trafikens utsläpp måste minska om vi ska ha en chans att klara klimatmålen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Transport emissions must decrease if we are to have a chance of meeting climate targets.”
  • Sweden leading in climate work»Sverige ska vara ledande i att minska den mänskliga« (party programme ↗)“Sweden must lead in reducing human”
CCenterpartietNoNofollows the plannot addressed

The plan puts climate first, states that every day without action is a lost day and wants climate policy to be based on what science requires.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan puts climate first, states that every day without action is a lost day and wants climate policy to be based on what science requires. A requirement for clear reporting of how climate targets will be reached when investment in biofuels decreases follows from that commitment, especially as the plan wants to reduce taxes to the maximum on blended biofuels. However, the plan does not specifically address the form of reporting.

Original (Swedish)

Planen sätter klimatet först, slår fast att varje dag utan handling är en förlorad dag och vill att klimatpolitiken utgår från vad vetenskapen kräver. Ett krav på tydlig redovisning av hur klimatmålen ska nås när satsningen på biodrivmedel minskar följer av det åtagandet, särskilt som planen vill sänka skatten maximalt på inblandade biodrivmedel. Planen talar dock inte om redovisningsformen som sådan.

  • climate firstdecisive»Centerpartiet sätter klimatet först, för att framtiden måste vara grön.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Centre Party puts climate first, because the future must be green.”
  • science-based climate policy»Klimatpolitiken ska utgå från vad vetenskapen visar är nödvändigt för att undvika farliga förändringar.« (party programme ↗)“Climate policy should be based on what science shows is necessary to avoid dangerous changes.”
  • biofuel investment»Sänk skatten maximalt på biodrivmedel som blandas in i bensin och diesel. Det skulle sänka bilisternas kostnader, gynna klimatet, skapa jobb och minska Sveriges oljeberoende.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Reduce taxes to the maximum on biofuels blended into petrol and diesel. This would reduce motorists' costs, benefit the climate, create jobs and reduce Sweden's oil dependence.”
  • urgency in climate work»Varje dag utan handling är en förlorad dag.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Every day without action is a lost day.”
LLiberalernaNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The plan binds itself to reaching the climate targets, with net zero emissions no later than 2045, and wants climate policy to be measured by how much it actually gets down emissions.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan binds itself to reaching the climate targets, with net zero emissions no later than 2045, and wants climate policy to be measured by how much it actually gets down emissions. A report of how the targets shall be reached when the investment in biofuels decreases is precisely the kind of target-fulfilment control the plan demands. The plan also affirms that fossil emissions from the transport sector shall be gone.

Original (Swedish)

Planen binder sig vid att klimatmålen ska nås, med nettonollutsläpp senast 2045, och vill att klimatpolitiken mäts i hur mycket den på riktigt får ner utsläppen. En redovisning av hur målen ska nås när satsningen på biodrivmedel minskar är precis den sortens måluppfyllelsekontroll planen efterfrågar. Planen slår också fast att fossilutsläppen från transportsektorn ska bort.

  • reach the climate targetsdecisive»Vi ska nå klimatmålen – inga nettoutsläpp av växthusgaser senast 2045 och därefter negativa utsläpp – inom ramen för en växande ekonomi.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We shall reach the climate targets – no net emissions of greenhouse gases no later than 2045 and thereafter negative emissions – within the framework of a growing economy.”
  • measure actual emission reductions»Och nu behövs en klimatpolitik som inte mäts i hur många skatter som höjs eller hur mycket den kostar skattebetalarna utan i hur mycket den på riktigt får ner utsläppen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“And now we need a climate policy that is not measured by how many taxes are raised or how much it costs taxpayers but by how much it actually gets down emissions.”
  • zero emissions in transport»Fossilutsläppen från transportsektorn ska bort.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Fossil emissions from the transport sector shall be gone.”
  • climate as greatest environmental threat»Klimatförändringarna är vår generations största miljöhot.« (party programme ↗)“Climate change is our generation's greatest environmental threat.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

KDKristdemokraternaYesYesfollows the plannot addressed

The counter-proposal is based on the premise that reduced investment in biofuels jeopardises climate goals and demands an account of how goals shall be met otherwise.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The counter-proposal is based on the premise that reduced investment in biofuels jeopardises climate goals and demands an account of how goals shall be met otherwise. The plan's explicit commitment is the opposite: price reductions shall occur mainly through reduced inclusion of expensive biofuel, whilst Sweden shall be a world leader in climate transition in a way that works and is effective. The plan thus sees no conflict between less biofuel and climate goals and therefore does not support the counter-proposal's premise and demand. No commitment on reporting requirements exists in the plan.

Original (Swedish)

Motförslaget bygger på att en minskad satsning på biodrivmedel äventyrar klimatmålen och kräver en redovisning av hur målen ändå ska nås. Planens uttryckliga åtagande är det motsatta: prissänkningar ska ske främst genom minskad inblandning av dyrt biobränsle, samtidigt som Sverige ska vara världsledande i klimatomställningen på ett sätt som fungerar och är effektivt. Planen ser alltså ingen konflikt mellan mindre biobränsle och klimatmålen och stöder därför inte motförslagets premiss och krav. Något åtagande om redovisningskrav finns inte i planen.

  • reduced biofuel inclusiondecisive»Sänk bensin- och dieselpriserna rejält för alla, främst genom minskad inblandningen av dyrt biobränsle.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Lower petrol and diesel prices significantly for all, mainly through reduced inclusion of expensive biofuel.”
  • effective climate transition»Sverige är världsledande i klimatomställningen och det ska vi fortsätta vara på ett sätt som både fungerar och är effektivt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden is a world leader in climate transition and we shall remain so in a way that both works and is effective.”
  • economy and ecology balanced»Hållbar utveckling förutsätter att ekologi, ekonomi och sociala hänsyn integreras« (party programme ↗)“Sustainable development requires that ecology, economics and social considerations are integrated”
MModeraternaYesYesfollows the plannot addressed

The counter-proposal rests on lower reduction levels being the wrong path, while the plan's explicit promise is to lower the price of petrol and diesel and for climate policy to be cost-effective rather than expensive symbol politics.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The counter-proposal rests on lower reduction levels being the wrong path, while the plan's explicit promise is to lower the price of petrol and diesel and for climate policy to be cost-effective rather than expensive symbol politics. The plan stands by net zero 2045, but wants to reach it through electrification, technology and international measures. The requirement linked to maintaining higher blending is therefore not supported.

Original (Swedish)

Motförslaget bygger på att sänkta reduktionsnivåer är fel väg, medan planens uttryckliga löfte är att sänka priset på bensin och diesel och att klimatpolitiken ska vara kostnadseffektiv snarare än dyrbar symbolpolitik. Planen står fast vid nettonoll 2045, men vill nå dit genom elektrifiering, teknik och internationella insatser. Kravet som är kopplat till att hålla kvar en högre inblandning stöds därför inte.

  • lower fuel pricesdecisive»Sänka priset på bensin och diesel så att du klarar din vardagsekonomi« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Lower the price of petrol and diesel so that you manage your everyday budget”
  • no expensive symbol politics»Klimatpolitiken får aldrig reduceras till dyrbar symbolpolitik eller snäv klimatnationalism.« (party programme ↗)“Climate policy must never be reduced to expensive symbol politics or narrow climate nationalism.”
  • cost-effective climate policy»Samtidigt är kostnaden för att minska utsläppen genom internationella klimatinsatser ofta mycket lägre än för att minska utsläppen i Sverige« (2022 manifesto ↗)“At the same time the cost of reducing emissions through international climate measures is often much lower than reducing emissions in Sweden”
  • net zero emissions 2045»Vi ska som land ta fullt ansvar här hemma och nå nettonollutsläpp senast år 2045.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We shall as a country take full responsibility here at home and reach net zero emissions by no later than 2045.”
SDSverigedemokraternaYesYesfollows the planexplicit

The counter-proposal is based on reduced reduction levels being a problem for climate goals.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The counter-proposal is based on reduced reduction levels being a problem for climate goals. The plan explicitly wants to lower the reduction obligation and fuel tax and believes that Swedish climate goals should be adapted to the EU level instead of being driven further at the cost of living standards and competitiveness. Climate policy should be guided by evidence and cost-effectiveness, not by the ambition to go first and farthest.

Original (Swedish)

Motförslaget bygger på att sänkta reduktionsnivåer är ett problem för klimatmålen. Planen vill uttryckligen sänka reduktionsplikten och bränsleskatten och anser att de svenska klimatmålen ska anpassas till EU-nivån i stället för att drivas längre på bekostnad av levnadsstandard och konkurrenskraft. Klimatpolitiken ska styras av evidens och kostnadseffektivitet, inte av ambitionen att gå först och längst.

  • reduced reduction obligationdecisive»Sänka bensin- och dieselpriset genom sänkt bränsleskatt och minskad reduktionsplikt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Lower petrol and diesel prices through reduced fuel tax and reduced reduction obligation.”
  • climate goals adapted to EU»De svenska klimatmålen bör anpassas till den klimatlagstiftning som finns på EU-nivå för att inte kraven på andra länder ska bli lägre som en konsekvens av att vi gör mer än nödvändigt på bekostnad av vår levnadsstandard och konkurrenskraft.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Swedish climate goals should be adapted to the climate legislation that exists at EU level so that requirements on other countries do not become lower as a consequence of us doing more than necessary at the cost of our living standards and competitiveness.”
  • competitiveness over pioneering role»Evidens, resultat och svensk konkurrenskraft ska styra genomförandet av klimatmål i högre utsträckning än politikers vilja att gå först och längst.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Evidence, results and Swedish competitiveness should guide the implementation of climate goals to a greater extent than politicians' desire to go first and farthest.”
  • global perspective on climate»Bedriva en effektiv klimatpolitik med ett tydligt globalt perspektiv« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Pursue an effective climate policy with a clear global perspective”

Share and embed

Embed as a widget (iframe): previewSizeLanguage

Sources and documents

Documents under consideration

Source: The Swedish Parliament