2025-05-082024/25:SkU14 · p.1SkUTaxation

Tax rates

VAT rates

What's at stake: The outcome affects the price of goods and services currently subject to different VAT rates, such as cinema tickets and artworks, and therefore affects consumers, cultural venues, and other sectors shaped by where the lines for reduced rates are drawn.

Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.

What the vote decides

The question is whether VAT rates should be reviewed and made more differentiated — for example with a lower rate on cinema tickets — or whether a uniform VAT with the standard rate as the main rule should remain unchanged.

Yes Yes — the committee proposal

The committee considers VAT an efficient tax that should be safeguarded as a state revenue source, with a uniform rate at the standard level remaining the guiding principle; it points out, among other things, that new legislation has already secured a uniform rate for art sales, and it therefore rejects all the motions calling for changes to the VAT rate structure.

No No — the reservations

Reservation 1 (S)

The dissenters want the government to investigate a reduced VAT on cinema tickets, in line with other cultural events, pointing out that the high Swedish cinema VAT has already pushed up ticket prices and forced some smaller cinemas to close; at the same time, they favor making VAT more uniform over time, with fewer reduced rates, and channeling support for the affected goods and services through the state budget's spending side instead.

Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.

VSMPCLKDMSD
YesNoAbstainAbsent

What do the votes mean here?

Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).

No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 1 by S.

Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.

What each plan points to — and how the party voted

For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.

PlanVoteConfidenceEvidence
VNoYes 19/0/0/5departs from the planconfidence: lownot addressed
Sown reservationNoNo 0/92/0/14follows the planconfidence: lowderived
MPNoYes 17/0/0/1departs from the planconfidence: lowderived
CNoAbstain 0/0/20/4departs from the planconfidence: lownot addressed
LNoYes 12/0/0/4departs from the planconfidence: lowderived
KDYesYes 17/0/0/2follows the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
MNoYes 59/0/0/9departs from the planconfidence: lowderived
SDNoAbstain 0/0/61/11departs from the planconfidence: lownot addressed

Committee proposal

The Riksdag rejects the motions 2024/25:155 by Victoria Tiblom (SD), 2024/25:563 by David Perez (SD), 2024/25:669 by Mattias Eriksson Falk and Roger Hedlund (both SD), 2024/25:1150 by Charlotte Nordström (M), 2024/25:1238 by Lars Engsund (M) motion 1, 2024/25:1352 by Per Söderlund et al. (SD) motions 1 and 4, 2024/25:1418 by Alexander Christiansson et al. (SD) motion 9, 2024/25:1450 by Tobias Andersson et al. (SD) motion 6, 2024/25:1474 by Larry Söder and Cecilia Engström (both KD), 2024/25:1480 by Helena Gellerman (L), 2024/25:1518 by Anna-Belle Strömberg and Malin Larsson (both S), 2024/25:1609 by Anna Lasses et al. (C), 2024/25:1636 by Lawen Redar (S), 2024/25:1858 by Kristina Axén Olin et al. (M), 2024/25:1950 by Margareta Cederfelt (M), 2024/25:2195 by Johanna Rantsi (M), 2024/25:2280 by Mattias Eriksson Falk and Roger Hedlund (both SD), 2024/25:2785 by Sten Bergheden (M), 2024/25:2882 by Sten Bergheden (M), 2024/25:2883 by Sten Bergheden (M), 2024/25:2953 by Helena Lindahl et al. (C) motion 27, 2024/25:2954 by Muharrem Demirok et al. (C) motion 2.2, 2024/25:3079 by Markus Wiechel (SD) motion 2, 2024/25:3110 by Lawen Redar et al. (S) motion 56, 2024/25:3157 by Helena Vilhelmsson et al. (C) motion 45, 2024/25:3169 by Rickard Nordin et al. (C) motion 52 and 2024/25:3190 by Niklas Karlsson et al. (S) motion 4.

Original (Swedish)

Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2024/25:155 av Victoria Tiblom (SD), 2024/25:563 av David Perez (SD), 2024/25:669 av Mattias Eriksson Falk och Roger Hedlund (båda SD), 2024/25:1150 av Charlotte Nordström (M), 2024/25:1238 av Lars Engsund (M) yrkande 1, 2024/25:1352 av Per Söderlund m.fl. (SD) yrkandena 1 och 4, 2024/25:1418 av Alexander Christiansson m.fl. (SD) yrkande 9, 2024/25:1450 av Tobias Andersson m.fl. (SD) yrkande 6, 2024/25:1474 av Larry Söder och Cecilia Engström (båda KD), 2024/25:1480 av Helena Gellerman (L), 2024/25:1518 av Anna-Belle Strömberg och Malin Larsson (båda S), 2024/25:1609 av Anna Lasses m.fl. (C), 2024/25:1636 av Lawen Redar (S), 2024/25:1858 av Kristina Axén Olin m.fl. (M), 2024/25:1950 av Margareta Cederfelt (M), 2024/25:2195 av Johanna Rantsi (M), 2024/25:2280 av Mattias Eriksson Falk och Roger Hedlund (båda SD), 2024/25:2785 av Sten Bergheden (M), 2024/25:2882 av Sten Bergheden (M), 2024/25:2883 av Sten Bergheden (M), 2024/25:2953 av Helena Lindahl m.fl. (C) yrkande 27, 2024/25:2954 av Muharrem Demirok m.fl. (C) yrkande 2.2, 2024/25:3079 av Markus Wiechel (SD) yrkande 2, 2024/25:3110 av Lawen Redar m.fl. (S) yrkande 56, 2024/25:3157 av Helena Vilhelmsson m.fl. (C) yrkande 45, 2024/25:3169 av Rickard Nordin m.fl. (C) yrkande 52 och 2024/25:3190 av Niklas Karlsson m.fl. (S) yrkande 4.

Riksdag decision: The Riksdag rejected approximately 40 motions regarding changes to VAT rates (moms) and exemptions from VAT. The motions were submitted during the general motion period in 2024 and concern, among other things, changed tax rates within culture and tourism as well as on fuel. The motions also concern lower tax rates for certain goods and services, and exemptions from VAT within, among other things, healthcare, as well as on recovered building materials and driver's license training. The Riksdag refers, among other things, to that preparation is ongoing and that it has already taken a position on these issues.

Counter-proposals

Plan vs actual vote

Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.

VVänsterpartietNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan particularly points out that culture has been impoverished and that cinemas exist in fewer places, and requires a broad culture that reaches everyone throughout the country.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan particularly points out that culture has been impoverished and that cinemas exist in fewer places, and requires a broad culture that reaches everyone throughout the country. To investigate reduced VAT on cinema tickets directly addresses that, while at the same time the counter-proposal's line of a more uniform VAT system with support via the spending side comes close to the plan's requirement for a simple, stable and solidaristic tax system. Overall, the plan supports the requirement, but the basis is weak.

Original (Swedish)

Planen pekar särskilt ut att kulturen utarmats och att biografer finns på färre orter, och kräver en bred kultur som kommer alla till del i hela landet. Att utreda sänkt moms på biobiljetter svarar direkt mot det, samtidigt som motförslagets linje om ett mer enhetligt momssystem med stöd via utgiftssidan ligger nära planens krav på ett enkelt, stabilt och solidariskt skattesystem. Sammantaget talar planen för kravet, men underlaget är svagt.

  • impoverished culture throughout the countrydecisive»Även kulturen och idrotten har utarmats när skolbibliotek läggs ned, simskolan blivit dyrare och biografer finns på färre orter.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Culture and sport have also been impoverished when school libraries close, swimming lessons become more expensive and cinemas exist in fewer places.”
  • culture throughout the country»Det är viktigt att kulturen står fri från såväl kommersiell som politisk styrning och finns i hela landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It is important that culture is free from both commercial and political control and exists throughout the country.”
  • culture that reaches everyone»Vi vill se gott om utrymmen för kulturellt skapande, som når alla i« (party programme ↗)“We want to see plenty of space for cultural creativity, that reaches everyone in”
  • simple and solidaristic tax system»skattesystem där de rikaste åter börjar betala sin del.« (party programme ↗)“tax system where the richest start paying their share again.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

SSocialdemokraternaNoNofollows the planderived

The counter-proposal's main line – that VAT over time is made more uniform with fewer reduced rates and that support is instead given on the expenditure side of the budget – coincides with the party programme's tax principles of broad tax bases, simplicity and uniform taxation.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The counter-proposal's main line – that VAT over time is made more uniform with fewer reduced rates and that support is instead given on the expenditure side of the budget – coincides with the party programme's tax principles of broad tax bases, simplicity and uniform taxation. At the same time, society's support for a vibrant cultural life throughout the country is an explicit commitment, which includes examining the conditions for cinemas. The plan says nothing specifically about cinema VAT, so the position is derived.

Original (Swedish)

Motförslagets huvudlinje – att momsen på sikt görs mer enhetlig med färre nedsatta satser och att stöd i stället ges på budgetens utgiftssida – sammanfaller med partiprogrammets skatteprinciper om breda skattebaser, enkelhet och likformig beskattning. Samtidigt är samhällets stöd till ett levande kulturliv i hela landet ett uttalat åtagande, vilket rymmer att biografernas villkor utreds. Planen säger inget om just biografmoms, så ställningstagandet är härlett.

  • broad tax bases and uniformitydecisive»tydlighet i regelverket, breda skattebaser och att alla förvärvsinkomster och ersättningar« (party programme ↗)“clarity in the regulatory framework, broad tax bases and that all earned income and compensation”
  • society's support for cultural life»Samhället ska stödja kulturlivet och ge konstnärer inom alla konstarter« (party programme ↗)“Society should support cultural life and support artists in all art forms”
  • vibrant cultural life»Sverige ska ha ett levande, fritt och obundet kulturliv som både stärker samhörigheten och utmanar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden should have a vibrant, free and independent cultural life that both strengthens togetherness and challenges.”
MPMiljöpartietNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The plan wants to build a stronger cultural life that more have access to and establishes that culture must be accessible to all.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan wants to build a stronger cultural life that more have access to and establishes that culture must be accessible to all. It also uses reduced VAT as a tool when something should become cheaper and more accessible, which makes an investigation of reduced cinema VAT consistent with the plan's line. The plan, however, says nothing about cinema VAT or about uniform tax rates, so the foundation is weak.

Original (Swedish)

Planen vill bygga ett starkare kulturliv som fler har tillgång till och slår fast att kulturen ska vara tillgänglig för alla. Den använder också nedsatt moms som verktyg när något ska bli billigare och mer tillgängligt, vilket gör en utredning av sänkt biografmoms förenlig med planens linje. Planen säger dock inget om biografmoms eller om enhetliga skattesatser, varför underlaget är svagt.

  • support for the entire cultural sectordecisive»satsa på en bred återhämtningsplan för kulturlivet i hela landet, som omfattar både offentliga, fria, professionella och ideella aktörer.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“invest in a comprehensive recovery plan for cultural life throughout the country, which includes both public, free, professional and non-profit actors.”
  • culture accessible to all»Kulturen ska vara tillgänglig för alla.« (party programme ↗)“Culture must be accessible to all.”
  • reduced VAT as a policy tool»sänka momsen kraftigt på bilpooler och andra delningstjänster och underlätta för de som vill dela, istället för äga, en bil.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“reduce VAT significantly on car pools and other sharing services and facilitate for those who want to share, rather than own, a car.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

CCenterpartietNoAbstaindeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan does not specify individual VAT rates, but states that total tax pressure must decrease and that no tax increases that harm business should be implemented.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan does not specify individual VAT rates, but states that total tax pressure must decrease and that no tax increases that harm business should be implemented. Investigating a reduction in VAT on cinema tickets is in line with this, as is the plan's commitment to provide culture throughout the country and create conditions for everyone to participate in cultural life. However, the evidence is weak, so the position is uncertain.

Original (Swedish)

Planen ger inget besked om enskilda momssatser, men slår fast att det totala skattetrycket ska ned och att inga skattehöjningar som skadar verksamheter ska genomföras. Att utreda en sänkt moms på biobiljetter ligger i linje med det, liksom med planens åtagande att tillhandahålla kultur i hela landet och skapa förutsättningar för alla att delta i kulturlivet. Underlaget är dock svagt, varför ställningstagandet är osäkert.

  • reduced total tax pressuredecisive»Det totala skattetrycket måste ner nästa mandatperiod.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Total tax pressure must decrease in the next term of office.”
  • culture throughout the country»Att tillhandahålla kultur i hela landet är en viktig utgångspunkt för Centerpartiet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Providing culture throughout the country is an important starting point for the Centre Party.”
  • conditions for cultural participation»Politiken ska fokusera på att skapa förutsättningar för alla att delta i kulturlivet.« (party programme ↗)“Policy should focus on creating conditions for everyone to participate in cultural life.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

LLiberalernaNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The counter-proposal's bearing principle – that VAT in time should become more uniform with fewer reduced tax rates and that support instead is given via the state budget's expenditure side – is the same line as the plan's requirement for a simple and comprehensible tax system and for support to culture to be given in open forms.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The counter-proposal's bearing principle – that VAT in time should become more uniform with fewer reduced tax rates and that support instead is given via the state budget's expenditure side – is the same line as the plan's requirement for a simple and comprehensible tax system and for support to culture to be given in open forms. That investigating the deviating cinema VAT is in that light a question of uniformity between cultural forms rather than a new reduction. The link is however derived: the plan does not take a stance on individual VAT rates, which makes the conclusion uncertain.

Original (Swedish)

Motförslagets bärande princip - att momsen på sikt ska bli mer enhetlig med färre nedsatta skattesatser och att stöd i stället ges över statsbudgetens utgiftssida - är samma linje som planens krav på ett enkelt och begripligt skattesystem och på att stöd till kultur ska ges i öppna former. Att utreda den avvikande biografmomsen är i det ljuset en fråga om likformighet mellan kulturformer snarare än en ny nedsättning. Kopplingen är dock härledd: planen tar inte ställning till enskilda momssatser, vilket gör slutsatsen osäker.

  • simple and understandable taxesdecisive»Sveriges skattenivåer ska vara konkurrenskraftiga och lättförståeliga för att uppmuntra till företagande, utbildning och investeringar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden's tax levels shall be competitive and easy to understand to encourage entrepreneurship, education and investments.”
  • tax shift towards consumption taxes»Sänkta skatter ska växlas mot höjda konsumtionsskatter och miljöskatter.« (party programme ↗)“Reduced taxes shall be exchanged for higher consumption taxes and environmental taxes.”
  • accessible and diverse culture»Det offentliga ska på alla nivåer gynna mångfalden av kulturuttryck, öka kulturens tillgänglighet« (party programme ↗)“The public shall at all levels favour a diversity of cultural expression, increase the accessibility of culture”
  • support instead of governance»Därför vill vi att staten ska styra mindre och att det ska vara kulturskapare och inte politiker som fattar besluten om stöd.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Therefore we want the state to govern less and for it to be cultural creators and not politicians who make the decisions on support.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

KDKristdemokraternaYesYesfollows the plannot addressed

The party programme's starting point is that the VAT rate in principle shall be general and that tax rules shall be as simple as possible.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The party programme's starting point is that the VAT rate in principle shall be general and that tax rules shall be as simple as possible. An investigation into reduced VAT on cinema tickets entails yet another reduced tax rate and thus goes against that starting point, even though the plan allows that exceptions sometimes may be needed. Cultural accessibility shall according to the plan be promoted by the public, but the plan does not indicate VAT reduction as the means.

Original (Swedish)

Partiprogrammets utgångspunkt är att mervärdesskattenivån i princip ska vara generell och att skattereglerna ska vara så enkla som möjligt. En utredning om sänkt moms på biobiljetter innebär ytterligare en nedsatt skattesats och går därmed emot den utgångspunkten, även om planen medger att undantag ibland kan behöva göras. Kulturens tillgänglighet ska enligt planen främjas av det offentliga, men planen anvisar inte momsnedsättning som medlet.

  • general VAT ratedecisive»Nivån på mervärdesskatten bör i princip vara generell.« (party programme ↗)“The VAT rate should in principle be general.”
  • simple tax rules»viktigt att skattereglerna utformas så enkelt som möjligt« (party programme ↗)“important that tax rules are designed as simply as possible”
  • exceptions may be needed»En hög generell nivå på momssatsen medför dock att undantag kan behöva göras.« (party programme ↗)“A high general VAT rate level does however mean that exceptions may need to be made.”
  • culture shall reach citizens»Det offentliga ska inte bara garantera kulturell frihet, utan också aktivt bidra till att kulturen kommer medborgarna till del.« (party programme ↗)“The public shall not only guarantee cultural freedom, but also actively contribute to culture reaching citizens.”
MModeraternaNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The plan does not address cinema VAT, but its tax policy commitments are a simpler tax system, a tax-increase ceiling and that more tax is not a solution in a country with one of the world's highest tax burdens.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan does not address cinema VAT, but its tax policy commitments are a simpler tax system, a tax-increase ceiling and that more tax is not a solution in a country with one of the world's highest tax burdens. The counter-proposal combines an investigation of lower VAT with a longer-term more uniform value-added tax, which aligns with both of these commitments. The plan therefore supports the requirement in substance, albeit derived.

Original (Swedish)

Planen tar inte upp biografmoms, men dess skattepolitiska åtaganden är ett enklare skattesystem, ett skattehöjarstopp och att mer skatt inte är någon lösning i ett land med ett av världens högsta skattetryck. Motförslaget kombinerar en utredning av sänkt moms med en långsiktigt mer enhetlig mervärdesskatt, vilket ligger i linje med båda dessa åtaganden. Planen stöder därför kravet i sak, om än härlett.

  • simpler tax systemdecisive»måste skattesystemet bli enklare« (2022 manifesto ↗)“the tax system must become simpler”
  • no new tax increases»mer skatt är ingen lösning« (2022 manifesto ↗)“more tax is no solution”
  • tax-increase ceiling»Införa ett skattehöjarstopp under den kommande mandatperioden som innebär att de samlade skatterna inte höjs« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Introduce a tax-increase ceiling during the coming mandate period meaning that combined taxes are not increased”
  • effective taxes»effektiva och aldrig avkräva medborgarna mer än nödvändigt« (party programme ↗)“effective and never demand more from citizens than necessary”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

SDSverigedemokraternaNoAbstaindeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan does not address cinema VAT, but establishes that reduced or better designed taxes can in the long term increase tax revenues and that small businesses' burdens should be eased.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan does not address cinema VAT, but establishes that reduced or better designed taxes can in the long term increase tax revenues and that small businesses' burdens should be eased. It also wants to protect, care for and promote Swedish culture. An investigation into reduced VAT on cinema tickets, which pressures smaller cinemas, lies closest to these principles. However, the basis is weak and the conclusion derived.

Original (Swedish)

Planen behandlar inte biografmoms, men slår fast att sänkta eller bättre utformade skatter på sikt kan öka skatteintäkterna och att småföretagens bördor ska lättas. Den vill också värna, vårda och visa svensk kultur. En utredning av sänkt moms på biobiljetter, som pressar mindre biografer, ligger närmast dessa principer. Underlaget är dock svagt och slutsatsen härledd.

  • reduced and better designed taxesdecisive»Sänkta eller bättre utformade skatter kommer i många fall att på sikt öka skatteintäkterna eftersom en sådan politik leder till ökad tillväxt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Reduced or better designed taxes will in many cases in the long term increase tax revenues because such a policy leads to increased growth.”
  • protect Swedish culture»Sverigedemokraterna vill värna, vårda och visa svensk kultur.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Sweden Democrats wish to protect, care for and promote Swedish culture.”
  • ease the burden for smaller actors»Verka för regelförenkling och avlasta småföretagens administrativa börda« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Work for regulatory simplification and relieve small businesses' administrative burden”
  • smaller actors' conditions»Onödigt stränga villkor i branschstandarder och i upphandlingar gör det ofta svårt för mindre aktörer att slå sig in på marknaden.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Unnecessarily strict conditions in industry standards and in procurement often make it difficult for smaller actors to break into the market.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

Share and embed

Embed as a widget (iframe): previewSizeLanguage

Sources and documents

Documents under consideration

Source: The Swedish Parliament