2024-05-162023/24:UbU10 · p.8UbUEducation
Learning for sustainable development
Sustainable development as a perspective in education
What's at stake: How clearly sustainable development is written into education's foundational mission affects how systematically the issue is addressed across all school forms; proponents argue that children in preschool already have this perspective while older students and adult learners lack an equally clear provision.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question was whether the Education Act should explicitly establish that sustainable development, with its social, economic and ecological dimensions, must permeate all education for both children and adults, or whether education's current value base and curricula already provide sufficient support for this.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The Committee points out that the Education Act already establishes that education must be designed in accordance with fundamental democratic values and human rights and rest on a scientific basis, and that the curricula describe education's value base in more detail; on that basis, the Committee sees no reason for a specific statutory provision on sustainable development and rejects the motion.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 14 (V, MP)
The Left Party and the Green Party want sustainable development to permeate all education and to be made more explicit in the school system's mission, so that all school forms for both students and adults have sustainable development - with its social, economic and ecological dimensions - as a foundational perspective, in the same way already applied to children in preschool.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 14 by V, MP.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
What each plan points to — and how the party voted
For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| Plan | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | No 0/19/0/5 | follows the plan | confidence: high | explicit |
| S | No | Yes 93/0/0/13 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| MP | No | No 0/13/0/5 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| C | No | Yes 19/0/0/5 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| L | Yes | Yes 12/0/0/4 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| KD | No | Yes 14/0/0/5 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| M | Yes | Yes 60/0/0/8 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| SD | Yes | Yes 61/0/0/11 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects motion 2023/24:2451 by Camilla Hansén et al. (MP) demand 23.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motion 2023/24:2451 av Camilla Hansén m.fl. (MP) yrkande 23.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag rejected approximately 130 proposals in motions concerning fundamental questions about education from the general motion period in 2023. The proposals dealt with, for example, schools' value foundations, safety and academic order in schools, grades and assessment, educational materials and school libraries. The Riksdag referred to, among other things, current regulations and that work is already underway in the areas covered by the motions.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants municipalities to be tasked with developing preventive measures against violence in preschools, schools, youth activities, and sports. (V, MP) — Reservation 14
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The election manifesto requires massive initiatives for education in what sustainable societal development means and that all political decisions should take into account the climate crisis.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto requires massive initiatives for education in what sustainable societal development means and that all political decisions should take into account the climate crisis. That sustainable development should more clearly be part of the education system's mission and permeate all education is directly in line with that commitment. The party programme also wants to see a school with a broad mission built on scientific foundation.
Original (Swedish)
Valplattformen kräver massiva satsningar på utbildning i vad hållbar samhällsutveckling innebär och att alla politiska beslut ska ta hänsyn till klimatkrisen. Att hållbar utveckling tydligare ska framgå av skolväsendets uppdrag och genomsyra all utbildning ligger direkt i linje med det åtagandet. Partiprogrammet vill dessutom se en skola med brett uppdrag byggd på vetenskaplig grund.
- education for sustainable developmentdecisive»massiva satsningar på omställningsstöd, kompetensutveckling och utbildning i vad hållbar samhällsutveckling innebär« (2022 manifesto ↗)“massive initiatives on transition support, competence development and education in what sustainable societal development means”
- climate considerations in all decisions»Omställningen behöver ske omgående och alla politiska beslut behöver ta hänsyn till den akuta kris som vi befinner oss i.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The transition needs to happen immediately and all political decisions need to take into account the acute crisis we are in.”
- the school's broad mission»Vi vill se en skola med ett brett uppdrag« (party programme ↗)“We want to see a school with a broad mission”
- scientifically based school»grundad i vetenskap och inriktad på att stärka människors möjligheter« (party programme ↗)“based on science and aimed at strengthening people's opportunities”
Both the election manifesto and the party programme make climate transformation our generation's defining question and bind the party to the climate policy framework.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
Both the election manifesto and the party programme make climate transformation our generation's defining question and bind the party to the climate policy framework. That sustainable development should permeate the entire school system's mission follows from this prioritization, even if the plan does not comment on the school law's formulations. The support therefore rests on derivation from general commitments rather than on a school policy promise.
Original (Swedish)
Både valmanifestet och partiprogrammet gör klimatomställningen till vår tids ödesfråga och binder partiet vid det klimatpolitiska ramverket. Att hållbar utveckling ska genomsyra hela skolväsendets uppdrag följer av den prioriteringen, även om planen inte uttalar sig om skollagens formuleringar. Stödet vilar därför på härledning ur allmänna åtaganden snarare än på ett skolpolitiskt löfte.
- climate as defining questiondecisive»Klimatomställningen är vår tids ödesfråga.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Climate transformation is our generation's defining question.”
- stable climate policy framework»Det klimatpolitiska ramverket ska ligga fast.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The climate policy framework should remain in place.”
- climate as overriding challenge»Klimatfrågan är vår tids ödesfråga.« (party programme ↗)“The climate question is our generation's defining question.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan's core principle is solidarity with future generations and that society must transform to be able to live well within nature's limits.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's core principle is solidarity with future generations and that society must transform to be able to live well within nature's limits. The party programme makes critical thinking and ethical discussions important components of teaching to prepare students to participate in social development. That sustainable development clearly shall permeate the entire school system's mission follows from these commitments.
Original (Swedish)
Planens bärande princip är solidaritet med kommande generationer och att samhället måste ställas om för att kunna leva gott inom naturens ramar. Partiprogrammet gör kritiskt tänkande och etiska diskussioner till viktiga inslag i undervisningen för att förbereda eleverna att delta i samhällsutvecklingen. Att hållbar utveckling tydligt ska genomsyra hela skolväsendets uppdrag följer av dessa åtaganden.
- solidarity with future generationsdecisive»solidaritet med kommande generationer« (2022 manifesto ↗)“solidarity with future generations”
- transformation within nature's limits»Vi måste ställa om våra samhällen så att vi klarar att leva ett gott liv i framtiden« (party programme ↗)“We must transform our societies so that we manage to live a good life in the future”
- critical thinking in school»kritiskt tänkande är viktiga inslag i undervisningen« (party programme ↗)“critical thinking are important components of teaching”
- school's global starting point»Undervisningen i skolan« (party programme ↗)“Teaching in school”
Sustainability is the plan's central principle: the party shall be leading in environmental matters and care for the environment and climate is described as a central part of politics, never a special interest.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
Sustainability is the plan's central principle: the party shall be leading in environmental matters and care for the environment and climate is described as a central part of politics, never a special interest. The party programme also formulates a responsibility to use without consuming for future generations and sees education as fundamental in a democratic society. Letting sustainable development more clearly pervade the education system's mission is in line with these commitments, even though the plan does not take a position on the legal text's design.
Original (Swedish)
Hållbarhet är planens bärande princip: partiet ska vara ledande i miljöfrågor och omsorgen om miljö och klimat beskrivs som en central del av politiken, aldrig ett särintresse. Partiprogrammet formulerar dessutom ett ansvar att bruka utan att förbruka för kommande generationer och ser utbildningen som grundläggande i ett demokratiskt samhälle. Att låta hållbar utveckling tydligare genomsyra skolväsendets uppdrag ligger i linje med dessa åtaganden, även om planen inte tar ställning till lagtextens utformning.
- environment is central, not a special interestdecisive»För Centerpartiet är omsorg om miljö och klimat en central del av politiken, aldrig en nedprioritering eller ett särintresse.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“For the Centre Party, care for the environment and climate is a central part of politics, never a downgrade or a special interest.”
- leading in environmental matters»Centerpartiet ska vara det ledande partiet i miljöfrågor« (party programme ↗)“The Centre Party shall be the leading party in environmental matters”
- responsibility for future generations»Vi har en skyldighet att bruka utan att förbruka« (party programme ↗)“We have a responsibility to use without consuming”
- education's societal mission»Utbildning är grundläggande i ett demokratiskt samhälle.« (party programme ↗)“Education is fundamental in a democratic society.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan wishes to narrow and sharpen the school's mission: knowledge is the main task and curricula shall be revised toward more facts and knowledge, with more teaching time in Swedish and mathematics.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wishes to narrow and sharpen the school's mission: knowledge is the main task and curricula shall be revised toward more facts and knowledge, with more teaching time in Swedish and mathematics. Imposing by law a comprehensive assignment about sustainable development on the entire school system pulls in the opposite direction and lies close to the symbolic politics the plan distances itself from. The counter-proposal's demands are therefore rejected.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill smalna av och skärpa skolans uppdrag: kunskap är huvuduppdraget och läroplanerna ska revideras mot mer fakta och kunskap, med mer undervisningstid i svenska och matematik. Att i lag ålägga hela skolväsendet ett genomgripande uppdrag om hållbar utveckling drar åt motsatt håll och ligger nära den symbolpolitik planen tar avstånd från. Motförslagets krav avvisas därför.
- curricula with knowledge focusdecisive»Läroplanerna ska revideras och få ett större fokus på fakta och kunskap.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Curricula shall be revised and receive greater focus on facts and knowledge.”
- knowledge as main task»Kunskap är skolans huvuduppdrag.« (party programme ↗)“Knowledge is school's main task.”
- more time for core subjects»Vi vill bygga ut undervisningstiden i bland annat svenska och matematik så att det finns tid till att lära sig mer.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We wish to expand teaching time in, among other things, Swedish and mathematics so there is time to learn more.”
- rejects symbolic politics»En klimatpolitik som ersätter den symbolpolitik där bidrag betalas ut till klimatångest i stället för det vi vet är allra viktigast: mer ny teknik, mer internationellt samarbete och fler effektiva styrmedel.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“A climate policy that replaces the symbolic politics where benefits are paid out to climate anxiety instead of what we know is most important: more new technology, more international cooperation and more effective policy instruments.”
The party programme defines sustainable development with the same three dimensions as the counter-proposal and requires that environmental considerations permeate all policy areas.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme defines sustainable development with the same three dimensions as the counter-proposal and requires that environmental considerations permeate all policy areas. According to the plan, the stewardship principle shall guide all political decisions and entails a responsibility to pass on values to future generations. That sustainable development shall permeate the entire school system therefore follows from the plan's fundamental stance.
Original (Swedish)
Principprogrammet definierar hållbar utveckling med samma tre dimensioner som motförslaget och kräver att miljöhänsyn genomsyrar alla politikområden. Förvaltarskapsprincipen ska enligt planen styra alla politiska beslut och innebär ett ansvar att föra vidare värden till kommande generationer. Att hållbar utveckling ska genomsyra hela skolväsendet följer därför av planens grundhållning.
- three sustainability dimensionsdecisive»Hållbar utveckling förutsätter att ekologi, ekonomi och sociala hänsyn integreras.« (party programme ↗)“Sustainable development requires that ecology, economics and social considerations are integrated.”
- stewardship in all decisions»Alla politiska beslut bör fattas i enlighet med förvaltarskapsprincipen« (party programme ↗)“All political decisions should be made in accordance with the stewardship principle”
- environmental considerations in all policy areas»Miljöhänsyn behöver genomsyra alla« (party programme ↗)“Environmental considerations need to permeate all”
- stewardship in education»Enligt förvaltarskapsprincipen har vi också en gemensam förpliktelse att föra vidare tidigare generationers« (party programme ↗)“According to the stewardship principle we also have a shared obligation to pass on previous generations'”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan's school policy purifies the knowledge mission: measurable factual knowledge, clear knowledge requirements and fewer burdens on teachers.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's school policy purifies the knowledge mission: measurable factual knowledge, clear knowledge requirements and fewer burdens on teachers. Writing sustainable development as a comprehensive mission for the entire school system adds another comprehensive value-based mission and pulls in the opposite direction. The party programme emphasizes that everything else rests on the school's ability to fulfil its main mission to impart knowledge.
Original (Swedish)
Planens skolpolitik renodlar kunskapsuppdraget: mätbara faktakunskaper, tydliga kunskapskrav och färre pålagor på lärarna. Att skriva in hållbar utveckling som ett genomgripande uppdrag för hela skolväsendet lägger till ytterligare ett övergripande värdegrundsuppdrag och drar åt motsatt håll. Idéprogrammet betonar att allt annat vilar på skolans förmåga att klara sitt huvuduppdrag att förmedla kunskap.
- measurable factual knowledgedecisive»Fokusera på mätbara faktakunskaper, med inspiration från Finlands läroplan« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Focus on measurable factual knowledge, inspired by Finland's curriculum”
- the knowledge mission first»skolans förmåga att klara sitt huvuduppdrag att förmedla« (party programme ↗)“the school's ability to fulfil its main mission to impart”
- clear knowledge requirements»Den svenska skolan ska ställa tydliga kunskapskrav och« (party programme ↗)“The Swedish school should set clear knowledge requirements and”
- fewer burdens on the school»Minska lärarnas dokumentationskrav« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Reduce teachers' documentation requirements”
The plan's key school commitment is a knowledge-focused school with tried-and-tested pedagogy and clearer learning objectives, and it explicitly opposes pedagogy marked by fuzzy thinking and norm critique.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's key school commitment is a knowledge-focused school with tried-and-tested pedagogy and clearer learning objectives, and it explicitly opposes pedagogy marked by fuzzy thinking and norm critique. Writing in that sustainable development should permeate all education pulls in the opposite direction, toward values-based governance rather than educational mandate. The plan also wants to end political experiments in schools, which speaks against the counter-proposal's demands.
Original (Swedish)
Planens bärande skolåtagande är en kunskapsfokuserad skola med beprövad pedagogik och tydligare kunskapsmål, och den vänder sig uttryckligen mot en pedagogik präglad av flum och normkritik. Att skriva in att hållbar utveckling ska genomsyra all utbildning drar åt motsatt håll, mot värdegrundsstyrning framför kunskapsuppdrag. Planen vill också avsluta politiska experiment i skolan, vilket talar emot motförslagets krav.
- knowledge-focused schooldecisive»Återupprätta en kunskapsfokuserad skola genom beprövad pedagogik och fokus på traditionellt lärande med lika villkor på alla skolor« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Re-establish a knowledge-focused school through tried-and-tested pedagogy and focus on traditional learning with equal conditions at all schools”
- against fuzzy pedagogy»En pedagogik som präglas av flum, normkritik och elevansvar får svårast följder för de som istället behöver lära sig om normer och tillhandahållas tydlig struktur och kunskap i skolan, som de inte får från annat håll.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Pedagogy marked by fuzzy thinking, norm critique and student responsibility has the harshest consequences for those who instead need to learn about norms and be provided with clear structure and knowledge at school, which they do not get elsewhere.”
- clearer learning objectives»Läroplaner ska kompletteras med tydligare kunskapsmål.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Curricula should be supplemented with clearer learning objectives.”
- no political experiments»Avsluta de politiska experimenten på Sveriges barn och unga« (2022 manifesto ↗)“End the political experiments on Sweden's children and young people”
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2023/24:UbU10)
- Committee report full text (HB01UbU10)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2023/24:1008 — Trygga rum för alla av Daniel Vencu Velasquez Castro (S)
- Motion 2023/24:1036 — Nollvision mot mobbning av Anna Wallentheim (S)
- Motion 2023/24:1049 — Pornografins skadeverkningar av Roland Utbult (KD)
- Motion 2023/24:1051 — Skolavslutningar och firanden av högtider med konfessionella inslag i kyrkolokaler av Ingemar Kihlström (KD)
- Motion 2023/24:1164 — Nationell gemenskap i skolan av Staffan Eklöf (SD)
- Motion 2023/24:119 — Totalförsvarskunskap i skolan av Eric Palmqvist (SD)
- Motion 2023/24:12 — Införande av svenskt kulturarv och hembygdskunskap i läroplanen av Björn Tidland (SD)
- Motion 2023/24:1200 — Betyg utan utslagning i skolan av Jim Svensk Larm (S)
- Motion 2023/24:1332 — Undervisa om folkmordet seyfo 1915 av Denis Begic och Ingela Nylund Watz (båda S)
- Motion 2023/24:1396 — Ingen plats för hederskultur i ett demokratiskt och jämställt samhälle av Ann-Sofie Alm (M)
- Motion 2023/24:1430 — Likvärdig skola med nationella prov för den anpassade skolan av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2023/24:1460 — Förändringar i läroplanen av Markus Wiechel och Alexander Christiansson (båda SD)
- Motion 2023/24:1462 — En samhällsförberedande skola av Markus Wiechel och Alexander Christiansson (båda SD)
- Motion 2023/24:1494 — Skolbibliotek av Gunilla Carlsson och Mattias Jonsson (båda S)
- Motion 2023/24:1524 — Politik för de nationella minoriteterna av Amanda Lind m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2023/24:1573 — Allmänt fritidshem och lovverksamhet för barn av Adnan Dibrani m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2023/24:1592 — F som betyg i grundskolan av Sofia Skönnbrink m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2023/24:1671 — Stärkt demokrati av Alexandra Völker och Azadeh Rojhan (båda S)
- Motion 2023/24:1717 — Politiska ungdomsförbund av Camilla Brunsberg (M)
- Motion 2023/24:1721 — Ungdomsförbund i skolan av Teresa Carvalho m.fl. (S)
Source: The Swedish Parliament