2026-06-092025/26:SoU32 · p.2SoUHealth & social services
Government legislative proposals
The government's bill allowing municipalities to employ doctors in municipal healthcare
What's at stake: The proposal would allow municipalities to employ their own doctors, which supporters say increases flexibility and access to care, but critics argue it risks creating duplicate and inefficient care structures, eroding regions' responsibility, and leading to more unequal care across different parts of the country.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether parliament should adopt the government's bill allowing municipalities to employ doctors for direct clinical patient work in municipal healthcare in full, or whether that specific part should be rejected while the rest of the proposal is adopted.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee welcomes the government's proposal to give municipalities the power to employ doctors and considers that it increases flexibility without changing the division of responsibility between regions and municipalities or creating parallel organizations. The committee therefore supports the bill in full and rejects the demands to reject parts of the proposal.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 2 (S, V, C, MP)
The reservation shares the ambition to strengthen medical competence in municipal healthcare, but points out that the proposal has received strong criticism from a majority of consultation bodies and considers that specifically the part allowing municipalities to employ doctors for direct clinical patient work risks creating duplicate and inefficient structures, eroding regions' responsibility, and making care more unequal. The reservation therefore wants that part of the proposal rejected, while adopting the proposal for authority to regulate agreements on doctor involvement between regions and municipalities.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: adopting the government's legislative proposal and rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 2 by S, V, C, MP.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
What each plan points to — and how the party voted
For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| Plan | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | No 0/21/0/0 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| S | No | No 0/106/0/0 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| MP | No | No 0/18/0/0 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| C | Yes | No 0/24/0/0 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| L | Yes | Yes 16/0/0/0 | follows the plan | confidence: high | explicit |
| KD | Yes | Yes 19/0/0/0 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| M | Yes | Yes 66/0/0/0 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| SD | No | Yes 68/0/0/2 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag adopts the Government's proposal for an Act amending the Health and Medical Care Act (2017:30). Thereby the Riksdag grants proposition 2025/26:216 and rejects the motions 2025/26:4081 by Fredrik Lundh Sammeli et al. (S) and 2025/26:4094 by Christofer Bergenblock et al. (C).
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen antar regeringens förslag till lag om ändring i hälso- och sjukvårdslagen (2017:30). Därmed bifaller riksdagen proposition 2025/26:216 och avslår motionerna 2025/26:4081 av Fredrik Lundh Sammeli m.fl. (S) och 2025/26:4094 av Christofer Bergenblock m.fl. (C).
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag approved the Government's proposal on strengthened medical competence in municipal health and medical care. The proposal means that municipalities can employ doctors in their own healthcare. The Riksdag considers that the Government's proposal provides increased flexibility regarding municipalities' opportunities to ensure access to doctors and thus ultimately to provide care according to need and of good quality. Furthermore, the Riksdag notes that the Government's law amendments mean that it is the municipalities themselves who decide whether doctors are to be employed. However, the region's responsibility for medical services remains regardless of whether a municipal doctor is employed or not. The law amendments shall come into force on 1 August 2026.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to reject the government's proposal on municipal health and medical care in its entirety. (S, V, C, MP) — Reservation 2
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan demands equal care regardless of where in the country you live and criticizes that care has been fragmented between levels and actors so that people are passed around.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan demands equal care regardless of where in the country you live and criticizes that care has been fragmented between levels and actors so that people are passed around. It bears the counter-proposal's objection that municipal doctor employment for patient-near work risks double structures, hollowed out regional responsibility and more unequal care. The plan also asserts that care shall be provided after needs and not after capacity in incorrectly constructed systems. The committee's reasoning about unchanged division of responsibility thus directly meets this.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver en jämlik vård oavsett var i landet man bor och kritiserar att vården styckats upp mellan nivåer och aktörer så att människor bollas runt. Det bär motförslagets invändning att kommunal läkaranställning för patientnära arbete riskerar dubbla strukturer, urholkat regionansvar och mer ojämlik vård. Planen slår också fast att vård ska ges efter behov och inte efter kapaciteten i felaktigt konstruerade system. Utskottets skäl om oförändrad ansvarsfördelning möts därför direkt.
- against fragmented caredecisive»Vården och omsorgen har styckats upp, mellan nivåer och aktörer, människor bollas runt i en stor administrativ apparat och det är ofta en kamp för den enskilde och dess anhöriga att få rätt tillgång till vård.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Care and services have been fragmented, between levels and actors, people are passed around in a large administrative apparatus and it is often a struggle for the individual and their relatives to get proper access to care.”
- equal care nationwide»Sjukvården måste vara jämlik, jämställd och tillgänglig, oavsett var i landet du bor och oavsett vem du är.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Healthcare must be equal, equitable and accessible, regardless of where in the country you live and regardless of who you are.”
- care after need»Vård måste ges efter människors behov och inte efter kapaciteten i felaktigt konstruerade system.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Care must be provided after people's needs and not after capacity in incorrectly constructed systems.”
- clear principal responsibility»Lösningen är inte att förstatliga sjukvården men för att säkerställa en jämlik vård i Sverige måste staten ta ett större ansvar för att skapa lika förutsättningar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The solution is not to nationalize healthcare but to ensure equal care in Sweden, the state must take greater responsibility for creating equal preconditions.”
The plan requires increased state responsibility and control of healthcare for national equity and equal right to good care regardless of where in the country one lives.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires increased state responsibility and control of healthcare for national equity and equal right to good care regardless of where in the country one lives. An arrangement where municipalities' different ability to hire doctors determines medical competence risks exactly the inequality the plan wants to eliminate. Limiting that part but maintaining regulation of agreements on doctor participation corresponds to the plan's requirement for clear principal responsibility.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver ökat statligt ansvar och kontroll över sjukvården för nationell likvärdighet och lika rätt till god vård oavsett var i landet man bor. En ordning där kommunernas olika förmåga att anlita läkare avgör den medicinska kompetensen riskerar just den ojämlikhet planen vill undanröja. Att begränsa den delen men behålla regleringen av avtal om läkarmedverkan svarar mot planens krav på tydligt huvudmannaskap.
- national equity in healthcaredecisive»Ökat statligt ansvar och kontroll över sjukvården för nationell likvärdighet.« (party programme ↗)“Increased state responsibility and control of healthcare for national equity.”
- equal right to care»Lika rätt för alla till god hälso- och sjukvård genom samhällets försorg.« (party programme ↗)“Equal right for all to good health and medical care provided by society.”
- equitable welfare throughout the country»God service och välfärd till medborgarna oavsett var i landet de bor.« (party programme ↗)“Good service and welfare for citizens regardless of where in the country they live.”
- equal care throughout the country»Vi vill ha en ny äldreomsorgslag som säkerställer att alla får en lika bra omsorg i hela landet och tillgång till sjuksköterskor dygnet runt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want a new elderly care law that ensures everyone receives equally good care throughout the country and access to nurses around the clock.”
The plan states that primary care shall be the hub of accessible care and that care shall be provided according to need, not according to place of residence, and warns that market adaptation has made access to care unequal.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan states that primary care shall be the hub of accessible care and that care shall be provided according to need, not according to place of residence, and warns that market adaptation has made access to care unequal. The counter-proposal wants to limit municipalities' ability to hire doctors for patient-close clinical work, because it risks double structures and more unequal care, which follows from the plan's commitments.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att primärvården ska vara navet i en nära vård och att vård ska ges efter behov, inte efter bostadsort, samt varnar för att marknadsanpassning gjort tillgången till vård ojämlik. Motförslaget vill begränsa möjligheten för kommuner att anställa läkare för patientnära kliniskt arbete, eftersom det riskerar dubbla strukturer och mer ojämlik vård, vilket följer av planens åtaganden.
- primary care as hubdecisive»Primärvården ska vara navet i en nära och förebyggande vård, med hälsofrämjande insatser i hemtjänst, elevhälsa, socialtjänst och äldreomsorg.« (party programme ↗)“Primary care shall be the hub of accessible and preventive care, with health-promoting efforts in home care, school health services, social services and elderly care.”
- equal care according to need»Ett hållbart samhälle bygger på förebyggande hälsosatsningar och tillgång till vård efter behov - inte efter plånbok eller bostadsort.« (party programme ↗)“A sustainable society is built on preventive health investments and access to care according to need - not according to wallet or place of residence.”
- unequal access to care»En ökad marknadsanpassning har också bidragit till att tillgången till vård skiljer sig mellan regioner« (party programme ↗)“Increased market adaptation has also contributed to access to care differing between regions”
- needs-driven elderly care»Äldreomsorgen ska vara behovsstyrd och offentligt finansierad.« (party programme ↗)“Elderly care shall be needs-driven and publicly financed.”
The plan's central principle for welfare is that healthcare shall be conducted closer to residents and that cooperation between municipal and regional healthcare shall increase.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's central principle for welfare is that healthcare shall be conducted closer to residents and that cooperation between municipal and regional healthcare shall increase. Restricting municipalities' ability to engage doctors for patient-facing work pulls in the opposite direction and moves decisions upward, contrary to the party programme's decentralisation principle. The counter-proposal's requirement is therefore rejected.
Original (Swedish)
Planens bärande princip för välfärden är att vården ska bedrivas närmare invånarna och att samarbetet mellan kommunal och regional hälso- och sjukvård ska öka. Att begränsa kommunernas möjlighet att anlita läkare för patientnära arbete drar åt motsatt håll och flyttar beslut uppåt, tvärtemot partiprogrammets decentraliseringsprincip. Motförslagets krav avvisas därför.
- healthcare closer to residentsdecisive»Vi är övertygade om att vägen till en bättre välfärd går genom att bedriva den närmare invånarna i hela landet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We are convinced that the path to better welfare goes through conducting it closer to residents throughout the country”
- cooperation between municipality and region»Genom en platsmiljard och ökat samarbete mellan kommunal och regional hälso- och sjukvård ökar vi möjligheterna att nå målet om en beläggningsgrad på 90% på våra sjukhus.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Through a location investment and increased cooperation between municipal and regional healthcare we increase the possibilities of achieving the goal of 90% occupancy levels in our hospitals.”
- decisions close to people»Beslut som endast berör en mer lokal nivå, eller bara individen själv, bör inte flyttas upp till en högre nivå« (party programme ↗)“Decisions that only affect a more local level, or only the individual themselves, should not be moved to a higher level”
- close care and choice»Vi vill försvara valfriheten inom vård och omsorg och bedriva verksamheten nära vårdtagarna.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to defend freedom of choice within healthcare and conduct activities close to patients.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan explicitly demands that the prohibition on municipalities employing physicians in elder care be removed, as a security reform for municipal care.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan explicitly demands that the prohibition on municipalities employing physicians in elder care be removed, as a security reform for municipal care. The counter-proposal wishes to limit precisely the part that allows municipalities to employ physicians for patient-centered clinical work and thus goes directly against the plan's commitment. The plan's other line on strengthened primary care and reduced hospital stays point in the same direction.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver uttryckligen att förbudet för kommuner att anställa läkare i äldreomsorgen tas bort, som en trygghetsreform för den kommunala vården. Motförslaget vill begränsa just den delen som låter kommuner anställa läkare för patientnära kliniskt arbete och går därmed rakt emot planens åtagande. Planens övriga linje om stärkt primärvård och minskade sjukhusvistelser pekar åt samma håll.
- municipalities shall be allowed to employ physiciansdecisive»För att öka tryggheten vill vi ta bort förbudet för kommuner att anställa läkare i äldreomsorgen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“To increase security we wish to remove the prohibition on municipalities employing physicians in elder care.”
- strengthened municipal care»För patientens skull ska vistelserna på akutsjukhus så långt möjligt minimeras och kommunerna ha hög beredskap att ta emot patienter som behöver fortsatt omsorg.« (party programme ↗)“For the patient's sake hospital stays at acute hospitals shall be minimized as much as possible and municipalities have high readiness to receive patients needing continued care.”
- strengthened primary care»Primärvårdens roll i sjukvårdssystemet ska stärkas.« (party programme ↗)“The role of primary care in the healthcare system shall be strengthened.”
- national quality governance»Den nationella styrningen av äldreomsorgens kvalitet behöver stärkas.« (party programme ↗)“National governance of elder care quality needs to be strengthened.”
The election manifesto demands increased medical expertise in elderly care and more care in people's own homes, which speaks for municipalities being able to hire doctors.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto demands increased medical expertise in elderly care and more care in people's own homes, which speaks for municipalities being able to hire doctors. The plan does not safeguard the regions' organisation as such but rather wants to move the main responsibility for care to achieve equal care. The counter-proposal's demand to limit precisely that part therefore goes against the documents' line.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet kräver ökad medicinsk kompetens inom äldreomsorgen och mer vård i det egna hemmet, vilket talar för att kommunerna ska kunna anlita läkare. Planen värnar inte regionernas organisation som sådan utan vill tvärtom flytta huvudmannaskapet för vården för att få en jämlik vård. Motförslagets krav på att begränsa just den delen går därför emot dokumentens linje.
- medical expertise in elderly caredecisive»Ökad medicinsk kompetens inom äldreomsorgen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Increased medical expertise in elderly care.”
- care in one's own home»Ökad möjlighet att vårdas i egna hemmet, särskilt för multisjuka, genom mobila sjukvårdsenheter som kan ge vård i hemmet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Increased opportunity to be cared for in one's own home, particularly for those with multiple illnesses, through mobile healthcare units that can provide care in the home.”
- regions' responsibility not sacrosanct»Avskaffa regionernas ansvar för sjukvården. Låt staten ta över ansvaret för vården med en gemensam organisation i stället för 21 olika. Det ger en högkvalitativ, effektiv och jämlik vård på lika villkor till hela befolkningen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Abolish regions' responsibility for healthcare. Let the state take over responsibility for care with a shared organisation instead of 21 different ones. This gives high-quality, efficient and equitable care on equal terms to the entire population.”
- doctors close to the patient»Fler vårdcentraler på landsbygden och enklare för enskilda läkare att starta egen verksamhet - så att vården finns nära till hands.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“More doctor's clinics in rural areas and easier for individual doctors to start their own activities - so that care is close at hand.”
The plan requires that medical expertise and continuity be strengthened in elderly care and that a patient-responsible physician contact forms the hub of elderly healthcare.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that medical expertise and continuity be strengthened in elderly care and that a patient-responsible physician contact forms the hub of elderly healthcare. Giving municipalities the authority to hire physicians serves that purpose, whereas the counter-proposal wants to strike out precisely that part. The plan is also based on choice and on decisions being made close to those affected. The requirement is rejected.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att den medicinska kompetensen och kontinuiteten stärks i äldreomsorgen och att en patientansvarig läkarkontakt utgör navet i äldres sjukvård. Att ge kommunerna befogenhet att anlita läkare tjänar det syftet, medan motförslaget vill stryka just den delen. Planen bygger dessutom på valfrihet och på att beslut fattas nära dem som berörs. Kravet avvisas.
- strengthened medical expertise in elderly caredecisive»Den medicinska kompetensen och kontinuiteten måste stärkas inom äldreomsorgen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Medical expertise and continuity must be strengthened within elderly care.”
- patient-responsible doctor as hub»Se till att den patientansvariga läkarkontakten ska utgöra navet i äldres sjukvård« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Ensure that the patient-responsible physician contact forms the hub of elderly healthcare”
- choice and diversity in welfare»För Moderaterna är valfrihet en central del av den svenska« (party programme ↗)“For the Moderates, choice is a central part of the Swedish”
- decisions close to citizens»Det politiska systemet ska bygga på att beslut fattas på lägsta« (party programme ↗)“The political system should be based on decisions being made at the lowest”
The plan requires a new unified healthcare system and wants the state to take greater primary responsibility, which speaks against building up a separate municipal doctor organization for patient-facing work.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires a new unified healthcare system and wants the state to take greater primary responsibility, which speaks against building up a separate municipal doctor organization for patient-facing work. The plan also states that care should be even and good throughout the country without regional imbalances, which supports the counter-proposal's concern for inequality. The demand for strengthened primary care is shared by the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver en ny sammanhållen sjukvård och vill att staten i större utsträckning tar huvudansvaret, vilket talar emot att bygga upp en egen kommunal läkarorganisation för patientnära arbete. Planen slår också fast att vården ska vara jämn och god över hela landet utan regionala obalanser, vilket stöder motförslagets oro för ojämlikhet. Kravet på en förstärkt primärvård delas av planen.
- unified healthcaredecisive»För att åstadkomma det krävs en ny sammanhållen sjukvård i Sverige.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“To achieve that requires a new unified healthcare system in Sweden.”
- equal care throughout the country»Sverigedemokraterna ser till hela Sveriges bästa och anser det därför vara av yttersta vikt att det skapas en jämn och god vård över hela landet så att inte regionala obalanser uppstår.« (party programme ↗)“The Sweden Democrats look to all of Sweden's benefit and therefore believe it is of utmost importance to create even and good care throughout the country so that regional imbalances do not arise.”
- review of care organization»Se över sjukvårdens organisation« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Review the organization of healthcare”
- strengthened primary care»Satsa på primärvården« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Invest in primary care”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2025/26:SoU32)
- Committee report full text (HD01SoU32)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2025/26:4081 — med anledning av prop. 2025/26:216 Stärkt medicinsk kompetens i kommunal hälso- och sjukvård av Fredrik Lundh Sammeli m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:4083 — med anledning av prop. 2025/26:216 Stärkt medicinsk kompetens i kommunal hälso- och sjukvård av Karin Rågsjö m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2025/26:4094 — med anledning av prop. 2025/26:216 Stärkt medicinsk kompetens i kommunal hälso- och sjukvård av Christofer Bergenblock m.fl. (C)
- Proposition 2025/26:216 — Stärkt medicinsk kompetens i kommunal hälso- och sjukvård
Source: The Swedish Parliament