2026-02-252025/26:TU8 · p.13TUTransport & infrastructure
Postal service throughout the country
Nationwide postal service: continued monitoring or a guaranteed universal service
What's at stake: The decision affects whether people in cities and rural areas alike can rely on access to postal services, and how the postal service functions as part of Sweden's civil preparedness, for instance in a crisis.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the government's current approach — monitoring developments in the postal market and standing ready to act — is enough to secure a universal postal service across the country, or whether parliament should guarantee that the service is not left to market forces alone.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee notes the major changes in the postal market but points out that preparedness work is already under way: the government is monitoring developments and a universal postal service meeting users' needs will remain in place, an inquiry proposal on keeping the scope of the basic service unchanged while revising delivery-time requirements is already being processed, and the committee therefore sees no reason to take further action now.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 26 (S)
The S party demands that access to postal services be guaranteed across the whole country, in both cities and rural areas, and that the postal service not be left entirely to the market since profit motives should not govern basic postal service; it also stresses that the postal service is part of Sweden's preparedness, not least in a crisis.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 26 by S.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have gone the other way
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: LLiberalerna, SDSverigedemokraterna
Ja 168–94Nej 93–169
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Abstain 0/0/18/4 | differs | confidence: high | not addressed |
| S | No | No 0/93/0/13 | match | confidence: high | not addressed |
| MP | No | Yes 15/0/1/2 | differs | confidence: high | not addressed |
| C | No | Abstain 0/0/21/3 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| L | No | Yes 13/0/0/3 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: medium | explicit |
| KD | No | Yes 17/0/0/2 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| M | Yes | Yes 60/0/0/8 | match | confidence: low | not addressed |
| SD | No | Yes 62/0/0/9 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
Broke with the party line
| MPDaniel Helldén (MP, Stockholms kommun) | Abstain — party line: Yes |
MPs whose vote differs from their party's majority position in this division. Marked with a dark ring in the chamber view.
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2025/26:603 by Marie Olsson (S), 2025/26:2370 by Malin Östh et al. (V) motions 3 and 6, 2025/26:3404 by Lars Püss and Helena Storckenfeldt (both M), 2025/26:3652 by Aylin Nouri et al. (S) motion 23 and 2025/26:3728 by Ulrika Heie et al. (C) motion 59.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2025/26:603 av Marie Olsson (S), 2025/26:2370 av Malin Östh m.fl. (V) yrkandena 3 och 6, 2025/26:3404 av Lars Püss och Helena Storckenfeldt (båda M), 2025/26:3652 av Aylin Nouri m.fl. (S) yrkande 23 och 2025/26:3728 av Ulrika Heie m.fl. (C) yrkande 59.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag said no to approximately 110 proposals in motions concerning digitalization and postal issues. The Riksdag also filed the Government's statement concerning the Swedish National Audit Office's audit report on state strategic digitalization projects with the documents, that is, concluded the matter. The motions were submitted during the general motion period of 2025 and one of them from 2024. The proposals primarily concern digital inclusion, digitalization in public activities, access to electronic communication, artificial intelligence and postal issues. The Riksdag refers, among other things, to ongoing work and measures taken. In the statement, the Government presents its assessment of the Swedish National Audit Office's findings and recommendations in the audit report State Strategic Digitalization Projects – Major Shared Challenges.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to ensure good connectivity, digital competence, and clear rules for data protection in digitalization and AI use. (S) — Reservation 26
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan's bearing commitment is that important societal operations and infrastructure shall be taken back from the market and that service shall function everywhere in the country.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's bearing commitment is that important societal operations and infrastructure shall be taken back from the market and that service shall function everywhere in the country. The counter-proposal's demands for guaranteed postal service nationwide and that profit interests shall not steer basic postal service are exactly the conclusion the plan draws from privatization's consequences, with pharmacies as an explicit example. The plan moreover sees robust public service as part of preparedness against crises.
Original (Swedish)
Planens bärande åtagande är att samhällsviktig verksamhet och infrastruktur ska tas tillbaka från marknaden och att service ska fungera överallt i landet. Motförslagets krav på garanterad posttjänst i hela landet och att vinstintresset inte ska styra grundläggande postservice är precis den slutsats planen drar av privatiseringarnas följder, med apoteken som uttryckligt exempel. Planen ser dessutom robust samhällsservice som en del av beredskapen mot kriser.
- reclaim privatized infrastructuredecisive»Det är hög tid att agera och ta tillbaka den samhällsviktiga verksamhet och infrastruktur som har privatiserats.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It is high time to act and take back the important societal operations and infrastructure that have been privatized.”
- service nationwide»Skola, vård, omsorg och annan service behöver fungera överallt.« (party programme ↗)“School, healthcare, elderly care and other services need to function everywhere.”
- privatization depletes rural areas»Privatiseringar har lett till dyrare elpris, att apoteken flyttar från landsbygd till städer och från fattiga till rika områden« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Privatizations have led to higher electricity prices, pharmacies moving from rural areas to cities and from poor to rich areas”
- welfare everywhere»Välfärden måste vara till för alla och finnas överallt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Welfare must be for everyone and exist everywhere.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan's decisive commitment is democratic control over functions vital to society and that resilience and citizens' security are placed before market interests.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's decisive commitment is democratic control over functions vital to society and that resilience and citizens' security are placed before market interests. The party programme further points out in particular that privatization of preparedness-vital functions has weakened the country's resilience, and demands good social service regardless of where in the country one lives. This is exactly what the counter-proposal demands for postal service.
Original (Swedish)
Planens avgörande åtagande är demokratisk kontroll över samhällsviktiga funktioner och att motståndskraft och medborgarnas trygghet sätts före marknadsintressen. Partiprogrammet pekar dessutom särskilt ut att privatisering av beredskapsviktiga funktioner försvagat landets motståndskraft, och kräver god samhällsservice oavsett var i landet man bor. Det är precis vad motförslaget kräver för postservicen.
- democratic control over societal functionsdecisive»Demokratisk kontroll över välfärden och samhällsviktiga funktioner.« (party programme ↗)“Democratic control over welfare and functions vital to society.”
- privatization weakens preparedness»Privatisering av funktioner som är viktiga för Sveriges beredskap har medfört risker för landets« (party programme ↗)“Privatization of functions important for Sweden's preparedness has led to risks for the country”
- social service throughout the country»God tillgång till samhällets service i hela landet.« (party programme ↗)“Good access to social service throughout the country.”
- resilience before market interests»Svensk motståndskraft liksom medborgarnas säkerhet och trygghet sätts före« (party programme ↗)“Swedish resilience as well as citizens' security and safety are placed before”
The plan states that public services shall exist in all parts of the country and explicitly criticises that services have disappeared when the state has abandoned monopolies on important public functions.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan states that public services shall exist in all parts of the country and explicitly criticises that services have disappeared when the state has abandoned monopolies on important public functions. It also requires that society secures control over critical infrastructure and communication in crises. The counter-proposal's requirement for guaranteed postal service throughout the country, without profit interests driving it, follows directly from these commitments.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att samhällsservice ska finnas i alla delar av landet och kritiserar uttryckligen att service försvunnit när staten släppt monopol på viktiga samhällsfunktioner. Den kräver också att samhället säkrar kontroll över kritisk infrastruktur och kommunikation i kriser. Motförslagets krav på garanterad posttjänst i hela landet, utan att vinstintresset styr, följer direkt av dessa åtaganden.
- public services throughout the countrydecisive»Vi vill att alla delar av landet ska leva, och att samhället ska säkerställa att samhällsservice ska finnas i alla områden.« (party programme ↗)“We want all parts of the country to thrive, and that society shall ensure that public services exist in all areas.”
- criticism of deregulated public services»staten släppt tidigare monopol på viktiga samhällsfunktioner« (party programme ↗)“the state has abandoned previous monopolies on important public functions”
- critical infrastructure in crises»Samhället måste säkra kontroll över kritisk infrastruktur och att välfärd, kommunikation, vatten, energiproduktion och elnät fungerar i krissituationer.« (party programme ↗)“Society must secure control over critical infrastructure and that welfare, communication, water, energy production and electrical grid function in crisis situations.”
- equivalent service regardless of location»Alla ska ha tillgång till likvärdig välfärd, god digital infrastruktur, kultur, service och utbildning.« (party programme ↗)“Everyone shall have access to equivalent welfare, good digital infrastructure, culture, service and education.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan's central commitment is that public and basic social services shall be close and reliable throughout the country, regardless of where one lives.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's central commitment is that public and basic social services shall be close and reliable throughout the country, regardless of where one lives. The counter-proposal's requirement for guaranteed postal services in both city and rural areas follows directly from this, and the link to societal preparedness is supported by the commitment to strengthen civil defence and preparedness. The plan's market-friendly basic view nuances the formulation on profit motive, but the actual requirement for access throughout the country holds.
Original (Swedish)
Planens bärande åtagande är att offentlig och grundläggande samhällsservice ska vara nära och pålitlig i hela landet, oavsett var man bor. Motförslagets krav på garanterad posttjänst i både stad och landsbygd följer direkt av det, och kopplingen till samhällets beredskap stöds av åtagandet att rusta civilförsvaret och beredskapen. Planens marknadsvänliga grundsyn nyanserar formuleringen om vinstintresse, men själva kravet på tillgång i hela landet bär.
- public service throughout the countrydecisive»Offentlig service ska vara nära och pålitlig i hela landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Public service shall be close and reliable throughout the country.”
- guaranteed social services»Det offentliga ska garantera att en sådan grundläggande samhällsservice finns, i hela landet,« (party programme ↗)“The public shall guarantee that such a basic social service exists throughout the country,”
- communications throughout the country»Alla ska ha tillgång till bredband, mobiltelefoni och surf i hela landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Everyone shall have access to broadband, mobile telephony and mobile internet throughout the country.”
- strengthened civilian preparedness»Även det civila försvaret är livsviktigt. Vi måste rusta civilförsvaret och samhällets beredskap inför krig och kris.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Civilian defence is also vital. We must strengthen civil defence and society's preparedness for war and crisis.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The party programme explicitly says that access to postal services must function throughout the country, and the election manifesto that state agencies shall be present in all parts of Sweden.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme explicitly says that access to postal services must function throughout the country, and the election manifesto that state agencies shall be present in all parts of Sweden. The plan therefore supports the demand for guaranteed postal service in both city and countryside, and that post is counted toward preparedness follows from the commitment to strengthen civil defense. The plan's market perspective, however, provides no support for the counter-proposal's principled rejection of profit interest.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet säger uttryckligen att tillgången till posttjänster måste fungera i hela landet, och valmanifestet att statliga myndigheter ska finnas närvarande i alla delar av Sverige. Planen stöder därför kravet på garanterad postservice i både stad och landsbygd, och att posten räknas till beredskapen följer av åtagandet att stärka det civila försvaret. Planens marknadssyn ger däremot inget stöd för motförslagets principiella avvisande av vinstintresse.
- postal services throughout the countrydecisive»Tillgången till posttjänster måste fungera i hela landet.« (party programme ↗)“Access to postal services must function throughout the country.”
- state presence throughout the country»Vägnätet ska fungera och statliga myndigheter ska finnas närvarande i alla delar av Sverige.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The road network shall function and state agencies shall be present in all parts of Sweden.”
- strengthened civil defense»Antalet anställda och värnpliktiga i krigsorganisationen ska öka, ny materiel tillföras och det civila försvaret stärkas i samma takt som det militära.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The number of employees and conscripts in the wartime organization shall increase, new materiel be supplied and civil defense be strengthened at the same pace as the military.”
- limited state ownership»Staten ska inte äga flygbolag, banker och telebolag.« (party programme ↗)“The state shall not own airlines, banks and telephone companies.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The election manifesto makes access to public services throughout the country a key issue and wants to establish more state service offices, and the party programme places on the state a responsibility for state services being accessible throughout Sweden.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto makes access to public services throughout the country a key issue and wants to establish more state service offices, and the party programme places on the state a responsibility for state services being accessible throughout Sweden. Postal services are such a basic service, and the plan moreover counts supplies and preparedness to totaldefence's core. The counter-proposal's demands for guaranteed postal services throughout the country and for postal services as a readiness function are therefore supported by the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet gör tillgången till samhällsservice i hela landet till en huvudfråga och vill inrätta fler statliga servicekontor, och partiprogrammet lägger på staten ett ansvar för att statlig service är tillgänglig i hela Sverige. Postservice är en sådan grundläggande service, och planen räknar dessutom försörjning och beredskap till totalförsvarets kärna. Motförslagets krav på garanterad posttjänst i hela landet och på posten som beredskapsfunktion stöds därför av planen.
- state services throughout the countrydecisive»Fler poliser med lokal närvaro, utbyggd primärvård, enklare starta lokal läkarmottagning och inrätta fler statliga servicekontor. Du ska känna dig trygg i hela landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“More police with local presence, expanded primary healthcare, easier to start a local doctor's clinic and establish more state service offices. You shall feel safe throughout the country.”
- state service responsibility»Samtidigt har staten ansvar för att den statliga servicen är tillgänglig i hela Sverige.« (party programme ↗)“At the same time the state has responsibility for state services being accessible throughout Sweden.”
- the whole country shall function»Hela Sverige ska fungera och det ska gå att bo och verka även utanför de stora städerna.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The whole of Sweden shall function and it shall be possible to live and work even outside the major cities.”
- preparedness as part of total defence»Det ekonomiska försvaret är en viktig del av totalförsvaret.« (party programme ↗)“Economic preparedness is an important part of total defence.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The counter-proposal's core requirement is that the postal service must not be transferred to the market because profit interest must not drive basic postal service.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The counter-proposal's core requirement is that the postal service must not be transferred to the market because profit interest must not drive basic postal service. The plan is built on the opposite premise: a market economy and private ownership are the foundation for prosperity, and anything that can be performed equally well by someone other than the public sector should not be performed by the public sector. While having the entire country function and strengthening civil preparedness would indeed support the counter-proposal's position, they do not justify the requirement to exempt postal service from the market.
Original (Swedish)
Motförslagets bärande krav är att posten inte får överlåtas till marknaden eftersom vinstintresse inte ska styra grundläggande postservice. Planen bygger på motsatt utgångspunkt: marknadsekonomi och enskilt ägande är grunden för välståndet, och det som kan utföras lika bra av någon annan än det offentliga ska inte utföras av det offentliga. Att hela landet ska fungera och att den civila beredskapen ska stärkas talar visserligen åt motförslagets håll, men bär inte kravet på att undanta posten från marknaden.
- market economy as foundationdecisive»Grunden för Sveriges välstånd är en marknadsekonomi baserad« (party programme ↗)“The foundation for Sweden's prosperity is a market economy based”
- private before public provision»Om något kan göras lika bra eller bättre av« (party programme ↗)“If something can be done equally well or better by”
- service throughout the country»Moderaterna vill ta vara på hela Sveriges möjligheter. Men ska det gå att bo och verka i hela Sverige måste också hela Sverige fungera.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Moderates want to harness all of Sweden's opportunities. But if it is to be possible to live and work throughout Sweden, all of Sweden must function.”
- strengthened civil preparedness»Säkra en långsiktig planering för det civila försvaret« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Ensure long-term planning for civil defense”
The plan explicitly says that all should have access to functioning postal services and particularly points out that postal delivery is worse in rural areas.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan explicitly says that all should have access to functioning postal services and particularly points out that postal delivery is worse in rural areas. That is precisely what the counter-proposal demands: guaranteed postal service nationwide, in city and countryside. The plan's demand for strengthened crisis preparedness also supports the argument that postal service is part of society's preparedness.
Original (Swedish)
Planen säger uttryckligen att alla ska ha tillgång till fungerande posttjänster och pekar särskilt ut att postutdelningen är sämre i glesbygden. Det är precis vad motförslaget kräver: garanterad posttjänst i hela landet, i stad som på landsbygd. Planens krav på stärkt krisberedskap stödjer också argumentet att posten är en del av samhällets beredskap.
- functioning postal services for alldecisive»Sverigedemokraterna vill satsa på utbyggnaden av bredband samt säkerställa att alla har tillgång till telefoni och fungerande posttjänster, inklusive möjligheten att få sin myndighetspost digitalt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Sweden Democrats want to invest in broadband expansion and ensure that everyone has access to telephone and functioning postal services, including the possibility to receive official mail digitally.”
- postal service in rural areas»Sverigedemokraterna ser med oro på hur landsbygden halkar efter i bredbandsutbyggnaden, men även mobiltäckningen och postutdelningen är sämre i glesbygden.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Sweden Democrats view with concern how rural areas are falling behind in broadband expansion, but postal delivery and mobile coverage are also worse in rural areas.”
- all of Sweden shall live»Principen om att hela Sverige skall leva är mycket viktig för Sverigedemokraterna.« (party programme ↗)“The principle that all of Sweden shall live is very important to the Sweden Democrats.”
- postal service as part of preparedness»Sverigedemokraterna vill stärka samhällets beredskap för alla typer av kriser som kan uppstå.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Sweden Democrats want to strengthen society's preparedness for all types of crises that can occur.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2025/26:TU8)
- Committee report full text (HD01TU8)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2024/25:3107 — Internationell samverkan av Morgan Johansson m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1082 — Satsning på infrastruktur och digital tillgång i Jönköpings län av Markus Kauppinen m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1165 — En säker e-legitimation under statlig kontroll av Adrian Magnusson och Amalia Rud Stenlöf (båda S)
- Motion 2025/26:1323 — Åtgärder för att motverka digitalt utanförskap av Sanna Backeskog m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1474 — Skyldighet för mobil- och teleoperatörer att samverka med rättsvårdande myndigheter av Eric Westroth (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:1774 — Risker och möjligheter med artificiell intelligens (AI) av Jan Ericson m.fl. (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1815 — Märkning av AI-genererat material för att motverka desinformation och deepfakes av Aylin Nouri och Eva Lindh (båda S)
- Motion 2025/26:1897 — Spetskompetens och digital utveckling inom tech av Mattias Jonsson och Johan Büser (båda S)
- Motion 2025/26:2297 — Skärpning av lagen om ansvar för elektroniska anslagstavlor - lex Flashback av Markus Selin (S)
- Motion 2025/26:2370 — Fungerande postservice, bredband och telefoni i hela landet av Malin Östh m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2025/26:2391 — Obligatoriskt biometriskt register av Markus Wiechel (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:251 — Förstärkta åtgärder för att bekämpa olagligt innehåll i postförsändelser av Johnny Svedin (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:2591 — Registrering av geodata vid inloggning i bankappar av Mattias Eriksson Falk och Roger Hedlund (båda SD)
- Motion 2025/26:2615 — Ökad transparens på bredbandsmarknaden av Rickard Nordin (C)
- Motion 2025/26:2616 — Enkel rapportering av telefonbedrägerier direkt i telefonen av Rickard Nordin (C)
- Motion 2025/26:2661 — Stärkt krav på mobiloperatörers reservkraft för ett robust samhälle av Cecilia Rönn (L)
- Motion 2025/26:2780 — Transporteffektivt och hållbart samhälle av Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2025/26:2832 — Digitalisering för hela Sverige av Niels Paarup-Petersen m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2025/26:2880 — Likvärdig digital infrastruktur i hela Värmland med särskilt fokus på landsbygden av Marléne Lund Kopparklint (M)
- Motion 2025/26:3028 — En fungerande telekommunikation i hela landet av Thomas Ragnarsson (M)
Source: The Swedish Parliament