Declaration, etc.

The plan demands that legal certainty be maintained through among other things legal aid and independent scrutiny, which bears the demand for fairer compensation for court costs when small businesses otherwise refrain from appealing. The plan also wants to see good conditions for sound companies and strong independence for voluntary organizations, which speaks for a review of the organizations' control duty threshold. The plan does not address tax procedure in detail, so the assessment is derived.

• legal certainty and legal aiddecisive»Rättssäkerheten behöver upprätthållas genom rättshjälp, medborgerlig« (party programme ↗)“Legal certainty needs to be maintained through legal aid, citizen”
• good conditions for sound companies»Vi vill se goda villkor för sunda företag« (party programme ↗)“We want to see good conditions for sound companies”
• strong voluntary organizations»Vi driver på för villkor som säkrar en stark« (party programme ↗)“We push for conditions that ensure strong”
• small businesses' conditions»Du som arbetar hårt inom ditt eget småföretag, i konkurrens med storbolag.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“You who work hard within your own small business, in competition with large companies.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

The plan stands guard over the principles of the rule of law and a legal system built on everyone's equality before the law, which supports the demand for more legally secure compensation for procedural costs when small businesses would otherwise refrain from appealing. The commitment to security for small business points the same way, as does the will to protect viable grassroots movements when the administrative burden of associations shall be reduced.

• equality before the lawdecisive»En rättsordning som bygger på allas likhet inför lagen.« (party programme ↗)“A legal system built on everyone's equality before the law.”
• security for small business»Trygghet för småföretagare.« (party programme ↗)“Security for small business.”
• rule of law principles»Slå vakt om rättsstatens principer.« (party programme ↗)“Stand guard over the principles of the rule of law.”
• viable grassroots movements»Livskraftiga folkrörelser för att hålla ihop samhället.« (party programme ↗)“Viable grassroots movements to hold society together.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

The plan states that everyone shall be equal before the law and that legal security must be guaranteed throughout the justice system, which becomes empty if small businesses refrain from appealing due to cost reasons. It also wants to make it easier to do business and that conditions for civil society shall be long-term and clear. Reviewing compensation for legal costs and the administrative burden for non-profit treasurers follows from these commitments.

• legal security for everyonedecisive»Alla ska vara lika inför lagen och rättssäkerheten måste garanteras i hela rättssystemet.« (party programme ↗)“Everyone shall be equal before the law and legal security must be guaranteed throughout the justice system.”
• facilitate for small businesses»Miljöpartiet vill stärka möjligheterna för människor med goda idéer att starta och driva företag.« (party programme ↗)“The Green Party wants to strengthen the opportunities for people with good ideas to start and run businesses.”
• clear conditions for associations»Stöd och villkor för civilsamhället måste vara långsiktiga och tydliga.« (party programme ↗)“Support and conditions for civil society must be long-term and clear.”
• facilitate voluntary engagement»Vi vill att fler människor ska ha möjlighet att lägga tid och engagemang på att organisera sig.« (party programme ↗)“We want more people to have the opportunity to devote time and commitment to organising themselves.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

The plan explicitly requires that the possibility of suing the state and municipality shall not be reserved for those with high income and wants to create a possibility for compensation for legal counsel when the individual had grounds to have their case heard. The counter-proposal's requirement for more secure regulation of court costs in tax cases, so that small businesses do not refrain from appealing on grounds of cost, is the same commitment. The requirement for a review of the monetary limit for associations' reporting obligations is supported by the deregulation line.

• compensation for legal counseldecisive»Vi vill skapa en möjlighet för enskilda att kunna få ersättning för ombud i förvaltningsärenden då denne haft skäl att få sin sak prövad.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to create a possibility for individuals to receive compensation for legal counsel in administrative cases when they have had grounds to have their case heard.”
• equal access to legal review»Möjligheten att processa mot stat eller kommun, då man har goda skäl att få sin sak prövad, ska i en liberal demokrati inte vara en rätt förbehållen de med hög inkomst.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The possibility of suing the state or municipality, when one has good grounds to have one's case heard, must in a liberal democracy not be a right reserved for those with high income.”
• reduced administration»Rensa upp i regelträsket för entreprenörer, stora som små.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Clear away regulatory red tape for entrepreneurs, large and small.”
• light burden for civil society»beskatta det så lite som möjligt.« (party programme ↗)“tax it as little as possible.”

The plan demands that individuals' opportunities to assert their rights against government agencies increase and that the right to compensation for government mistakes improve, which is the core of the question of compensation for court costs in tax cases. It also demands reduced regulatory burden for small businesses and good conditions for civil society, which affects the amount limit for organizations' control reports. The counter-proposal's demands are therefore supported.

• strengthened legal standing against agenciesdecisive»Den enskildes möjligheter att hävda sina rättigheter gentemot myndigheterna måste öka.« (party programme ↗)“Individuals' opportunities to assert their rights against government agencies must increase.”
• compensation for government error»Rätten till kompensation eller skadestånd vid myndigheters misstag eller övergrepp behöver förbättras.« (party programme ↗)“The right to compensation or damages for government mistakes or abuse needs to be improved.”
• reduced regulatory burden»Regelbördan för små företag ska minska, genom ansträngningar på både kommunal, statlig och europeisk nivå, och offentliga beslut analyseras ur småföretagarperspektiv.« (party programme ↗)“The regulatory burden on small businesses shall decrease, through efforts at municipal, national and European levels, and public decisions analyzed from a small-business perspective.”
• good conditions for civil society»Politiken ska bidra till att det civila samhället ges goda förutsättningar.« (party programme ↗)“Policy shall contribute to civil society being given good conditions.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

The plan requires that courts' position is strong and that individuals thereby gain a stronger position against the state and municipality; that small businesses refrain from appealing due to cost reasons undermines exactly this. The plan also wants forthcoming laws to be tested from a small business perspective and for tax rules to be as simple as possible, and it wants to facilitate non-profit activity.

• the individual's position against the statedecisive»Domstolarnas ställning ska vara stark och självständig. Den enskilda människan får« (party programme ↗)“Courts' position shall be strong and independent. The individual”
• small business perspective»Tillkommande lagar bör prövas ur ett« (party programme ↗)“Forthcoming laws should be tested from”
• simple tax rules»utformas så enkelt som möjligt för att därigenom underlätta för bland annat« (party programme ↗)“be designed as simply as possible to thereby facilitate”
• facilitate non-profit sector»Ideell verksamhet ska prioriteras framför kommersiella intressen vid utformningen av« (party programme ↗)“Non-profit activity shall be prioritized over commercial interests in the design of”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

The counter-proposal wants to make compensation for legal costs in tax cases more legally secure and review an amount limit that creates unnecessary administration for non-profit organizations. The plan promises to remove a third of red tape and administrative costs and to shorten authorities' processing times, while the party programme requires that all exercise of public power should be governed by law and predictable. Both elements of the counter-proposal are thus in the plan's direction.

• reduced administrative burdendecisive»Ta bort en tredjedel av företagens administrationskostnader och en tredjedel av regelkrånglet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Remove a third of companies' administrative costs and a third of red tape”
• legally secure exercise of power»All offentlig maktutövning ska vara lagstyrd och vägledas av« (party programme ↗)“All exercise of public power should be governed by law and guided by”
• more efficient authority processes»Korta myndigheternas handläggningstider genom en bortre tidsgräns« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Shorten authorities' processing times through a final deadline”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

The plan wants to simplify regulations, improve legal security and reduce small businesses' administrative burden. Investigating fairer compensation for procedural costs in tax cases hits precisely the situation where costs for the individual business owner do not match social benefit, and a review of the unchanged amount threshold for associations' information obligations reduces unnecessary administration. The plan also states that existing rules need to be reviewed.

• reduced administrative burdendecisive»Verka för regelförenkling och avlasta småföretagens administrativa börda« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Work for regulatory simplification and reduce small businesses' administrative burden”
• legally secure regulations»Förenkla regelverken och förbättra rättssäkerheten« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Simplify regulations and improve legal security”
• unnecessary rules out»För att få fler och växande företag är det viktigt att ta bort onödiga regler där kostnaderna för företagen inte motsvarar nyttan för samhället.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“To get more and growing businesses it is important to remove unnecessary rules where the costs to businesses do not match society's benefit.”
• review of existing rules»Nya regler ska vara kostnadseffektiva och befintliga regler behöver ses över.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“New rules should be cost-effective and existing rules need to be reviewed.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.