2024-05-222023/24:UU4 · p.7UUForeign affairs
Foreign policy, security policy and crisis preparedness
A joint Nordic defense and security policy commission
What's at stake: The decision concerns how Nordic defense cooperation should be organized and politically anchored, which affects how coordinated the region can be in meeting security threats and how much influence the national parliaments get over the joint security-policy analysis.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether Sweden should work to establish a Nordic defense and security policy commission anchored in all the Nordic parliaments, or whether the ongoing cooperation within Nordefco and NATO is already sufficient.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee points to the already ongoing and deepening cooperation within Nordefco and NATO, including a new long-term vision for joint military operations, materiel cooperation and total defense, and therefore rejects the proposal for a separate Nordic defense and security policy commission.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 11 (S)
The reservation wants Sweden to work for the prompt establishment of a Nordic defense and security policy commission anchored in all the Nordic parliaments, with a joint security-policy analysis, the development of total defense, and developments in the Arctic and the Baltic Sea as main points, to enable more effective planning and coordination of defense resources.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 11 by S.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
What each plan points to — and how the party voted
For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| Plan | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Yes 19/0/0/5 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| S | No | No 0/93/0/13 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| MP | No | Abstain 0/0/16/2 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | derived |
| C | No | Abstain 0/0/19/5 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| L | No | Yes 11/0/0/5 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| KD | No | Yes 17/0/0/2 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| M | No | Yes 60/0/0/8 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| SD | No | Yes 62/0/0/10 | departs from the plan | confidence: high | derived |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2022/23:1465 by Emma Berginger et al. (MP) claim 7, 2023/24:1879 by Emma Berginger et al. (MP) claim 7, 2023/24:2466 by Kerstin Lundgren et al. (C) claim 35, 2023/24:2562 by Morgan Johansson et al. (S) claim 13, and 2023/24:2564 by Peter Hultqvist et al. (S) claim 37.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2022/23:1465 av Emma Berginger m.fl. (MP) yrkande 7, 2023/24:1879 av Emma Berginger m.fl. (MP) yrkande 7, 2023/24:2466 av Kerstin Lundgren m.fl. (C) yrkande 35, 2023/24:2562 av Morgan Johansson m.fl. (S) yrkande 13 och 2023/24:2564 av Peter Hultqvist m.fl. (S) yrkande 37.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag filed a memorandum on Nordic cooperation and a report on the Swedish delegation of the Nordic Council's activities in the records, meaning the matters are concluded. The Riksdag also rejected approximately 80 proposals in motions. The proposals dealt with, among other things, Nordic cooperation, the Arctic and the Barents Region, and foreign policy, security policy and crisis preparedness.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to strengthen Sweden's engagement for the Arctic and drive international cooperation for security, stability, climate, and sustainable development in the region. (S) — Reservation 11
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The party programme wants to see close cooperation between the Nordic countries and build better, defensive cooperation as a counterweight to NATO, with a total defence built on universal conscription.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme wants to see close cooperation between the Nordic countries and build better, defensive cooperation as a counterweight to NATO, with a total defence built on universal conscription. A Nordic commission anchored in all Nordic parliaments is in that direction and moreover gives elected oversight in security policy. The plan's opposition to militarization makes the support conditional and the assessment somewhat uncertain.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet vill se ett tätt samarbete mellan de nordiska länderna och bygga upp bättre, defensiva samarbeten som motvikt till Nato, med ett totalförsvar byggt på allmän värnplikt. En nordisk kommission förankrad i samtliga nordiska parlament ligger i den riktningen och ger dessutom folkvald insyn i säkerhetspolitiken. Planens motstånd mot militarisering gör stödet villkorat och bedömningen något osäker.
- close Nordic cooperationdecisive»Vi vill se ett tätt samarbete mellan de nordiska länderna och ett gott« (party programme ↗)“We want to see close cooperation between the Nordic countries and good”
- defensive cooperation»motvikt till det, som istället bygger upp bättre, defensiva samarbeten,« (party programme ↗)“counterweight to that, which instead builds up better, defensive cooperation,”
- total defence with conscription»Vi vill se ett modernt totalförsvar byggt på allmän värnplikt, med en« (party programme ↗)“We want to see modern total defence built on universal conscription, with a”
- against militarization»Vi vänder oss emot militarisering och kapprustning.« (party programme ↗)“We oppose militarization and arms races.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto makes Nordic cooperation central to security policy and wants to continue international cooperation and strengthen civil defence.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto makes Nordic cooperation central to security policy and wants to continue international cooperation and strengthen civil defence. The party programme explicitly wants to develop Nordic cooperation to meet common challenges. A Nordic defence and security policy commission with shared analysis and coordination of total defence aligns with these commitments.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet gör det nordiska samarbetet centralt i säkerhetspolitiken och vill fortsätta internationella samarbeten samt rusta det civila försvaret. Partiprogrammet vill uttryckligen utveckla det nordiska samarbetet för att möta gemensamma utmaningar. En nordisk försvars- och säkerhetspolitisk kommission med gemensam analys och samordning av totalförsvaret ligger i linje med dessa åtaganden.
- Nordic cooperation is centraldecisive»Också det nordiska samarbetet är centralt, liksom samarbetet med de baltiska staterna.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Nordic cooperation is also central, as is cooperation with the Baltic states.”
- develop Nordic cooperation»Vi vill utveckla det nordiska samarbetet för att möta de gemensamma utmaningarna som« (party programme ↗)“We want to develop Nordic cooperation to meet the common challenges facing”
- continued defence cooperation»Vi vill fortsätta internationella samarbeten och utveckla cyberförsvaret och underrättelseförmågan.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to continue international cooperation and develop cyber defence and intelligence capability.”
- strengthened civil defence»Arbetet att förstärka det civila försvaret och krisberedskapen måste fortsätta« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Work to strengthen civil defence and crisis preparedness must continue”
The plan explicitly values Nordic cooperation in the region and wants to broaden security policy so that it meets future crises, with a greater share of defence spending on civil defence and crisis preparedness.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan explicitly values Nordic cooperation in the region and wants to broaden security policy so that it meets future crises, with a greater share of defence spending on civil defence and crisis preparedness. A joint Nordic commission for security policy analysis and total defence aligns with this, even though the plan does not mention any such body.
Original (Swedish)
Planen värnar uttryckligen det nordiska samarbetet i närområdet och vill bredda säkerhetspolitiken så att den möter framtidens kriser, med större andel av försvarets pengar till det civila försvaret och krisberedskapen. En gemensam nordisk kommission för säkerhetspolitisk analys och totalförsvar ligger i linje med detta, även om planen inte nämner något sådant organ.
- Nordic cooperationdecisive»Vi vill värna det unika samarbetet i vårt närområde, mellan de nordiska staterna.« (party programme ↗)“We want to value the unique cooperation in our region, between the Nordic states.”
- civil defence and crisis preparedness»satsa en större andel av försvarets pengar på det civila försvaret, och öka anslagen till krisberedskap« (2022 manifesto ↗)“allocate a greater share of defence spending to civil defence, and increase allocations to crisis preparedness”
- broad security perspective»Vi vill se en politik som sätter mänsklig säkerhet« (party programme ↗)“We want to see a policy that puts human security”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The party programme emphasises Nordic cooperation as an important role for security and bridging European constellations.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme emphasises Nordic cooperation as an important role for security and bridging European constellations. The election manifesto wants to strengthen both military defence and civilian preparedness, which are precisely the issues a Nordic defence and security policy commission should analyse and coordinate. The requirement is therefore in line with the plan, even though the plan does not comment on the specific commission format.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet lyfter det nordiska samarbetet som en viktig roll för säkerhet och överbryggande av europeiska konstellationer. Valmanifestet vill rusta både det militära försvaret och den civila beredskapen, vilket är just de frågor en nordisk försvars- och säkerhetspolitisk kommission ska analysera och samordna. Kravet ligger därför i linje med planen, även om planen inte uttalar sig om just kommissionsformen.
- Nordic cooperation importantdecisive»Det nordiska samarbetet, som överbryggar många europeiska konstellationer, spelar en viktig roll.« (party programme ↗)“Nordic cooperation, which bridges many European constellations, plays an important role.”
- strengthen defence and preparedness»Centerpartiet vill rusta försvaret, stärka Sveriges civila beredskap och fullfölja inträdet i Nato.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Centre Party wants to strengthen defence, strengthen Sweden's civilian preparedness and complete NATO accession.”
- strengthened total defence»Även det civila försvaret är livsviktigt. Vi måste rusta civilförsvaret och samhällets beredskap inför krig och kris.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Civilian defence is also vital. We must strengthen civil defence and society's preparedness for war and crisis.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan bases security policy on cooperation with other democracies and wishes Sweden never to hesitate to together with democratic neighboring countries defend democracy, with particular Swedish contributions to the defense of Finland and the Baltic.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan bases security policy on cooperation with other democracies and wishes Sweden never to hesitate to together with democratic neighboring countries defend democracy, with particular Swedish contributions to the defense of Finland and the Baltic. A Nordic defense and security policy commission with joint analysis of the Arctic and the Baltic Sea serves precisely that purpose. The substantive demand is therefore supported, even though the plan does not mention the commission form.
Original (Swedish)
Planen grundar säkerhetspolitiken på samarbete med andra demokratier och vill att Sverige aldrig ska tveka att tillsammans med demokratiska grannländer försvara demokratin, med särskilda svenska bidrag till försvaret av Finland och Baltikum. En nordisk försvars- och säkerhetspolitisk kommission med gemensam analys av Arktis och Östersjön tjänar just det syftet. Sakkravet stöds därför, även om planen inte nämner kommissionsformen.
- cooperation with democraciesdecisive»Grunden för Sveriges säkerhetspolitik ska vara samarbete med andra demokratier.« (party programme ↗)“The foundation for Sweden's security policy shall be cooperation with other democracies.”
- joint defense with neighboring countries»Vi är den tydligaste rösten för att Sverige aldrig ska tveka att tillsammans med demokratiska grannländer försvara demokratin.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We are the clearest voice for Sweden never to hesitate to together with democratic neighboring countries defend democracy.”
- Swedish strategic depth in the north»Sverige ska inom Nato särskilt kunna bidra med den infrastruktur som behövs för att skapa ett nödvändigt och strategiskt djup för försvaret av Finland och Baltikum.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden shall within NATO be particularly able to contribute the infrastructure needed to create a necessary and strategic depth for the defense of Finland and the Baltic.”
- joint defense in the alliance»Därför ska Sverige gå med i Nato och tillsammans med USA, Kanada och våra europeiska grannar försvara både Sverige och vår del av världen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Therefore Sweden shall join NATO and together with the USA, Canada and our European neighbors defend both Sweden and our part of the world.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The party programme establishes that Swedish security policy shall be characterized by cooperation, foresight and comprehensive solutions and that appropriate joint institutions should exist to streamline international cooperation.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme establishes that Swedish security policy shall be characterized by cooperation, foresight and comprehensive solutions and that appropriate joint institutions should exist to streamline international cooperation. A Nordic defense and security policy commission with joint analysis is such an institution. The plan is, however, silent on parliamentary anchoring specifically.
Original (Swedish)
Principprogrammet slår fast att svensk säkerhetspolitik ska präglas av samarbete, förutseende och helhetslösningar och att lämpliga gemensamma institutioner bör finnas för att effektivisera internationellt samarbete. En nordisk försvars- och säkerhetspolitisk kommission med gemensam analys är en sådan institution. Planen är dock tyst om just parlamentarisk förankring.
- cooperation in security policydecisive»Sveriges säkerhetspolitik ska präglas av samarbete, förutseende och helhetslösningar« (party programme ↗)“Swedish security policy shall be characterized by cooperation, foresight and comprehensive solutions”
- joint institutions»bör lämpliga gemensamma institutioner finnas« (party programme ↗)“appropriate joint institutions should exist”
- cooperation with allies»vara en naturlig del av svensk säkerhetspolitik.« (party programme ↗)“be a natural part of Swedish security policy.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto wants Sweden's NATO membership together with Finland to lead to deepened cooperation within the Nordic region and between the Nordic region and the Baltics, and for cooperation in Northern Europe to be deepened.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto wants Sweden's NATO membership together with Finland to lead to deepened cooperation within the Nordic region and between the Nordic region and the Baltics, and for cooperation in Northern Europe to be deepened. A Nordic defence and security policy commission with shared security policy analysis is a concrete expression of that commitment. The plan moreover readily establishes coordinating bodies, such as a national security council.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet vill att Natomedlemskapet tillsammans med Finland leder till ett fördjupat samarbete inom Norden och mellan Norden och Baltikum, och att samarbetet i norra Europa fördjupas. En nordisk försvars- och säkerhetspolitisk kommission med gemensam säkerhetspolitisk analys är ett konkret uttryck för det åtagandet. Planen skapar dessutom gärna samordnande organ, som ett nationellt säkerhetsråd.
- fördjupat nordiskt samarbetedecisive»Verka för att Sveriges Natomedlemskap tillsammans med Finland leder till ett fördjupat samarbete inom Norden och mellan Norden och Baltikum« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Work for Sweden's NATO membership together with Finland to lead to deepened cooperation within the Nordic region and between the Nordic region and the Baltics”
- samarbete i norra Europa»Verka för ett fördjupat samarbete i norra Europa« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Work for deepened cooperation in Northern Europe”
- grannländernas särställning»Relationen till våra nordiska och baltiska grannländer har en« (party programme ↗)“The relationship with our Nordic and Baltic neighbours has a”
- samordning av säkerhetspolitiken»Inrätta ett nationellt säkerhetsråd på Statsrådsberedningen« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Establish a national security council at the Government Offices”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan explicitly commits to deepening Nordic defence and security cooperation further and itself proposes a joint Nordic body in the form of a crisis management committee.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan explicitly commits to deepening Nordic defence and security cooperation further and itself proposes a joint Nordic body in the form of a crisis management committee. A Nordic defence and security policy commission anchored in Nordic parliaments is the same type of coordination instrument. The plan also points to the Arctic and neighbouring region's security situation as prioritized issues.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill uttryckligen fördjupa det nordiska försvars- och säkerhetssamarbetet ytterligare och föreslår själv ett gemensamt nordiskt organ i form av en krisberedskapskommitté. En nordisk försvars- och säkerhetspolitisk kommission med förankring i de nordiska parlamenten är samma typ av samordningsinstrument. Planen pekar dessutom ut Arktis och närområdets säkerhetsläge som prioriterade frågor.
- Nordic defence cooperationdecisive»Fördjupa det nordiska försvars- och säkerhetssamarbetet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Deepen Nordic defence and security cooperation”
- deepened security cooperation»Det är vår mening att försvars- och säkerhetssamarbetet behöver fördjupas ytterligare och att gemensamma insatser krävs för att stävja gränsöverskridande organiserad brottslighet och terrorism.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It is our view that defence and security cooperation needs to be deepened further and that joint efforts are required to stem transnational organized crime and terrorism.”
- Nordic coordination body»Inrätta en nordisk krisberedskapskommitté för samordnad hantering av kriser« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Establish a Nordic crisis management committee for coordinated crisis response”
- Arctic policy»En tydlig Arktispolitik ska tas fram som hindrar ryska och kinesiska framflyttningar och bejakar svenska ekonomiska intressen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“A clear Arctic policy should be drawn up that prevents Russian and Chinese advances and supports Swedish economic interests.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2023/24:UU4)
- Committee report full text (HB01UU4)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2022/23:1465 — Förbud mot kärnvapen och krav på Sveriges framtida Natomedlemskap av Emma Berginger m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2022/23:1673 — Jämställdhet för hållbar utveckling av Annie Lööf m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2022/23:1755 — Arktis av Rasmus Giertz m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2022/23:247 — Försvarsmakten, klimat och miljö av Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2022/23:315 — Internationellt kris- och hälsosamarbete av Markus Wiechel (SD)
- Motion 2022/23:53 — Hbtqi-frågor i världen av Lotta Johnsson Fornarve m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2022/23:849 — Internationellt samarbete i en ny tid av Kerstin Lundgren m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2023/24:1191 — Internationellt kris- och hälsosamarbete av Markus Wiechel (SD)
- Motion 2023/24:1267 — Lagstiftning utan gränshinder av Kjell-Arne Ottosson (KD)
- Motion 2023/24:1607 — En fungerande arbetsmarknad i hela Öresundsområdet av Niels Paarup-Petersen (C)
- Motion 2023/24:1879 — Arbete för kärnvapennedrustning och förhållningssätt till Nato av Emma Berginger m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2023/24:2028 — Samarbete och säkerhet i Norrbotten av Fredrik Lundh Sammeli m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2023/24:2079 — Pånyttfödelse för det nordiska samarbetet av Johan Hultberg (M)
- Motion 2023/24:2466 — Utrikes- och biståndspolitik av Kerstin Lundgren m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2023/24:2492 — En näringspolitik för tillväxt av Elisabeth Thand Ringqvist m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2023/24:2542 — Nationell Öresundsagenda av Noria Manouchi m.fl. (M)
- Motion 2023/24:2562 — Internationell samverkan av Morgan Johansson m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2023/24:2564 — Försvar och samhällets krisberedskap av Peter Hultqvist m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2023/24:2860 — med anledning av skr. 2023/24:90 Nordiskt samarbete 2023 av Ann-Christine Frohm Utterstedt m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2023/24:496 — Arktis av Aron Emilsson m.fl. (SD)
Source: The Swedish Parliament