2026-06-102025/26:UU23 · p.1UUForeign affairs
Agreement on enhanced partnership and cooperation between the European Union and its Member States, on the one hand, and the Republic of Kyrgyzstan, on the other hand
Approval of the EU-Kyrgyzstan Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement
What's at stake: The decision determines Sweden's stance on the EU's deepened cooperation with Kyrgyzstan in areas including trade, research, climate and security policy, weighing the benefits of engagement in Central Asia against the risk of legitimizing a government where democracy is under pressure.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
At issue is whether parliament should approve the enhanced partnership and cooperation agreement between the EU and Kyrgyzstan, or reject it on the grounds that democracy in the country is weakening and that cooperation should instead be used to more clearly advance human rights and rule-of-law principles.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee welcomes that the agreement rests on respect for democratic principles, human rights, fundamental freedoms and the rule of law, notes that it is not expected to have any effect on state finances, and considers that parliament should approve the enhanced partnership agreement with Kyrgyzstan.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 1 (MP)
The reservation is not opposed to cooperation with Kyrgyzstan as such but holds that the agreement should be rejected, since cooperation with a country where democracy is weakening should instead be used to more clearly push for human rights and rule-of-law principles.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: approving what the committee proposes and rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 1 by MP.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
What each plan points to — and how the party voted
For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| Plan | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Yes 21/0/0/0 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| S | Yes | Yes 105/0/0/1 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| MP | Yes | No 0/18/0/0 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | derived |
| C | Yes | Yes 22/0/0/2 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| L | Yes | Yes 16/0/0/0 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| KD | Yes | Yes 19/0/0/0 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| M | Yes | Yes 66/0/0/0 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| SD | Yes | Yes 69/0/0/1 | follows the plan | confidence: low | derived |
Committee proposal
Parliament approves the agreement on enhanced partnership and cooperation between the European Union and its Member States, on the one hand, and the Republic of Kyrgyzstan, on the other hand. Thereby Parliament concurs with proposition 2025/26:248 and rejects motion 2025/26:4190 by Jacob Risberg et al. (MP) claim 1.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen godkänner avtalet om fördjupat partnerskap och samarbete mellan Europeiska unionen och dess medlemsstater, å ena sidan, och Republiken Kirgizistan, å andra sidan. Därmed bifaller riksdagen proposition 2025/26:248 och avslår motion 2025/26:4190 av Jacob Risberg m.fl. (MP) yrkande 1.
Riksdag decision: Parliament approved the Government's proposal for an agreement on enhanced partnership and cooperation between the European Union and its Member States, on the one hand, and the Republic of Kyrgyzstan, on the other hand. The agreement aims to deepen the political and economic relations between the EU and Kyrgyzstan and is based on the common values that the EU is built on: democracy, respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms and the principles of the rule of law. The agreement covers several areas of cooperation such as trade, sustainable development and connectivity, intellectual property, research and innovation, education, environment and climate change, the principles of the rule of law, human rights and civil society. The European Union (EU) has since 1999 had a partnership and cooperation agreement with the Republic of Kyrgyzstan. With the enhanced agreement, today's political and economic conditions are better reflected, as well as the EU's ambition to further develop its relation with the country.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to prioritize protection of free media, independent civil society, political opposition, women's rights organizations, and human rights defenders in cooperation with Kyrgyzstan. (MP) — Reservation 1
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan wants Sweden to consistently drive human rights and realize the UN declaration fully, and it is critical of agreements that strengthen authoritarian regimes or restrict the space for democratic decisions.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants Sweden to consistently drive human rights and realize the UN declaration fully, and it is critical of agreements that strengthen authoritarian regimes or restrict the space for democratic decisions. Rejecting a deepened partnership agreement with a country where democracy is weakening, in order instead to use the relationship to push for rule of law and human rights, is in line with this. The plan does not however address this particular agreement, so the conclusion is derived.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill att Sverige konsekvent driver mänskliga rättigheter och förverkligar FN:s förklaring fullt ut, och den är kritisk mot avtal som stärker auktoritära regimer eller inskränker utrymmet för demokratiska beslut. Att avslå ett fördjupat partnerskapsavtal med ett land där demokratin försvagas, för att i stället använda relationen till att driva på för rättsstat och mänskliga rättigheter, ligger i linje med detta. Planen behandlar dock inte just detta avtal, varför slutsatsen härleds.
- human rights fully realizeddecisive»rättigheterna var ett historiskt framsteg vi vill förverkliga fullt ut.« (party programme ↗)“rights were a historical step forward that we want to realize fully.”
- against agreements that restrict democracy»mot handelsavtal som inskränker utrymmet för« (party programme ↗)“against trade agreements that restrict the space for”
- strict demands on dictatorships»förbjuda vapenexport till diktaturer, stater som för angreppskrig och« (party programme ↗)“ban arms exports to dictatorships, states waging wars of aggression and”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan wants the EU to conclude more agreements where our values about social dialogue, human rights and environment are guiding, and stands up for open and fair trade.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants the EU to conclude more agreements where our values about social dialogue, human rights and environment are guiding, and stands up for open and fair trade. Rejecting the partnership agreement with Kyrgyzstan is the opposite of that line: the plan uses agreements as a tool to advance human rights, not something to refrain from. The demand for respect for international law and democracy is instead addressed through the agreement's terms.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill att EU sluter fler avtal där våra värderingar om social dialog, mänskliga rättigheter och miljö är vägledande, och står upp för en öppen och rättvis handel. Att avslå partnerskapsavtalet med Kirgizistan är motsatsen till den linjen: planen använder avtalen som verktyg för att driva mänskliga rättigheter, inte som något att avstå från. Kravet på respekt för folkrätt och demokrati tillgodoses i stället genom avtalets villkor.
- values-based agreementsdecisive»EU behöver sluta fler handelsavtal där också våra värderingar om social dialog, mänskliga rättigheter och miljö är vägledande.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The EU needs to conclude more trade agreements where our values about social dialogue, human rights and environment are also guiding.”
- open and fair trade»Vi står upp för en öppen, fri och rättvis handel.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We stand up for open, free and fair trade.”
- free trade against protectionism»Insatser för att främja svensk export, värna frihandeln och motverka protektionism.« (party programme ↗)“Efforts to promote Swedish exports, protect free trade and counter protectionism.”
- international law and rule of law»Försvar för folkrätten och en regelbaserad världsordning.« (party programme ↗)“Defence of international law and a rules-based world order.”
The counter-proposal's requirement is that the partnership agreement with Kyrgyzstan be rejected.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The counter-proposal's requirement is that the partnership agreement with Kyrgyzstan be rejected. The plan by contrast wants Sweden to be a driver for democracy and human rights precisely in cooperation between states and sees trade and cooperation agreements as tools for democratisation. Rejecting an agreement rather than using it does not thereby align with the plan's line, even though the conclusion is derived.
Original (Swedish)
Motförslagets krav är att partnerskapsavtalet med Kirgizistan avslås. Planen vill tvärtom att Sverige är pådrivande för demokrati och mänskliga rättigheter just i samarbeten mellan stater och ser handels- och samarbetsavtal som verktyg för demokratisering. Att avvisa ett avtal snarare än att använda det ligger därmed inte i linje med planens linje, även om slutsatsen är härledd.
- driver in state-to-state cooperationdecisive»för demokrati och mänskliga rättigheter både inom internationella organisationer och i« (party programme ↗)“for democracy and human rights both within international organisations and in”
- trade as a democratisation tool»Sveriges och EU:s handelspolitik ska vara ett verktyg för« (party programme ↗)“Sweden's and the EU's trade policy shall be a tool for”
- more state-to-state cooperation»Vi är övertygade om att det behövs mer samarbete mellan länder för att lösa« (party programme ↗)“We are convinced that more cooperation between countries is needed to solve”
- universal human rights»Vår solidaritet är global. Mänskliga fri- och rättigheter är universella och en förutsättning« (party programme ↗)“Our solidarity is global. Human freedoms and rights are universal and a prerequisite”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The counter-proposal wants to reject the partnership agreement.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The counter-proposal wants to reject the partnership agreement. The plan's core commitment goes the other way: Sweden needs more free trade and international cooperation, not protectionism and closed borders, and the world should be seen as an opportunity rather than a threat. The party programme lifts cooperation and dialogue as the way to defend oppressed people's rights. The plan supports making tougher demands within the framework of agreements, not stopping agreements.
Original (Swedish)
Motförslaget vill avslå partnerskapsavtalet. Planens bärande åtagande går åt motsatt håll: Sverige behöver mer frihandel och internationellt samarbete, inte protektionism och stängda gränser, och omvärlden ska ses som en möjlighet snarare än ett hot. Partiprogrammet lyfter samarbete och dialog som vägen att försvara förtryckta människors rätt. Planen stöder däremot att hårdare krav ställs inom ramen för avtal, inte att avtal stoppas.
- free trade and international cooperationdecisive»Sverige behöver mer frihandel och internationellt samarbete, inte protektionism och stängda gränser.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden needs more free trade and international cooperation, not protectionism and closed borders.”
- openness towards the world»Sverige behöver också ett politiskt ledarskap som ser resten av världen som en möjlighet, inte som ett hot« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden also needs a political leadership that sees the rest of the world as an opportunity, not as a threat”
- cooperation and dialogue»Dagens internationella ekonomiska beroende ökar betydelsen av fredsinsatser, samarbete och dialog.« (party programme ↗)“Today's international economic interdependence increases the importance of peace efforts, cooperation and dialogue.”
- demands within agreements»Ställ hårdare krav på arbetsvillkor, miljö och klimat i handelsavtal.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Set tougher demands on working conditions, environment and climate in trade agreements.”
The plan sees information exchange and contacts with the rest of the world as decisive precisely for democratic forces in unfree states, and makes Sweden a strong voice for free trade through agreements.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan sees information exchange and contacts with the rest of the world as decisive precisely for democratic forces in unfree states, and makes Sweden a strong voice for free trade through agreements. To reject a partnership agreement with Kyrgyzstan would close that channel instead of opening it. The plan's requirement for democracy and rights conditions in agreements speaks for tightened conditions, not rejection.
Original (Swedish)
Planen ser informationsutbyte och kontakter med omvärlden som avgörande just för demokratikrafterna i ofria stater, och gör Sverige till en stark röst för frihandel genom avtal. Att avslå ett partnerskapsavtal med Kirgizistan skulle stänga den kanalen i stället för att öppna den. Planens krav på demokrati- och rättighetsvillkor i avtal talar för skärpta villkor, inte för avslag.
- contacts strengthen democratic forcesdecisive»Informationsutbyte och kontakter med omvärlden är avgörande för demokratikrafterna i världens ofria stater.« (party programme ↗)“Information exchange and contacts with the rest of the world are decisive for democratic forces in the world's unfree states.”
- free trade through agreements»Sverige ska vara en stark röst för frihandel, i första hand genom globala avtal men annars genom regionala överenskommelser.« (party programme ↗)“Sweden shall be a strong voice for free trade, first and foremost through global agreements but otherwise through regional agreements.”
- rights conditions in agreements»EU:s grannskapsavtal med unionens grannar söderut måste innehålla samma krav på demokrati och mänskliga rättigheter som avtalen med grannarna österut, och tydliga krav om respekt för kvinnors, barns och minoriteters rättigheter ska ställas.« (party programme ↗)“The EU's neighborhood agreements with the union's neighbors to the south must contain the same requirements for democracy and human rights as the agreements with the neighbors to the east, and clear requirements for respect for women's, children's and minorities' rights shall be set.”
- cooperation for freedoms and rights»Därför vill vi att Sverige gör mycket mer, både som enskilt land och inom internationella samarbeten, för fri- och rättigheter, frihandel, fria val och samarbete i den fria världen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Therefore we want Sweden to do much more, both as a single country and within international cooperations, for freedoms and rights, free trade, free choice and cooperation in the free world.”
The plan establishes that positive means such as cooperation projects, talks and dialogues shall be used primarily to promote human rights, and that boycotts are only a last resort.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that positive means such as cooperation projects, talks and dialogues shall be used primarily to promote human rights, and that boycotts are only a last resort. Rejecting a partnership agreement with Kyrgyzstan is the opposite of that order. The plan also wants the EU's relations with the world to be characterized by respect and dialogue.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att positiva verkningsmedel som samarbetsprojekt, samtal och dialoger ska användas i första hand för att främja mänskliga rättigheter, och att bojkott först är en sista utväg. Att avslå ett partnerskapsavtal med Kirgizistan är motsatsen till den ordningen. Planen vill också att EU:s relationer till omvärlden präglas av respekt och dialog.
- positive means firstdecisive»I främjandet av mänskliga rättigheter ska i första hand positiva verkningsmedel användas,« (party programme ↗)“In promoting human rights, positive means shall be used primarily,”
- sanctions as a last resort»mänskliga rättigheter. Som en sista utväg kan bojkott och sanktioner bli aktuella.« (party programme ↗)“human rights. As a last resort, boycotts and sanctions may become relevant.”
- bilateral human rights dialogue»En dialog om mänskliga rättigheter bör även föras bilateralt med enskilda länder.« (party programme ↗)“A dialogue on human rights should also be conducted bilaterally with individual countries.”
- dialogue with the world»omvärlden präglas av respekt och dialog.« (party programme ↗)“relations with the world are characterized by respect and dialogue.”
The plan is based on Sweden together with others building political and economic cooperation and the state facilitating trade and internationalisation.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan is based on Sweden together with others building political and economic cooperation and the state facilitating trade and internationalisation. To reject a partnership agreement that rests on democratic principles and rule of law lies outside that approach. The plan's method for promoting democracy and human rights is engagement and prioritised measures, not absent cooperation. The requirement is rejected.
Original (Swedish)
Planen bygger på att Sverige tillsammans med andra ska bygga politiska och ekonomiska samarbeten och att staten ska underlätta handel och internationalisering. Att avslå ett partnerskapsavtal som vilar på demokratiska principer och rättsstatens principer ligger utanför den linjen. Planens metod för att främja demokrati och mänskliga rättigheter är engagemang och prioriterade insatser, inte uteblivet samarbete. Kravet avvisas.
- cooperation as foreign policy methoddecisive»Sverige ska fortsätta att tillsammans med likasinnade nationer« (party programme ↗)“Sweden shall continue to together with like-minded nations”
- facilitate trade»och underlätta för handel och internationalisering.« (party programme ↗)“and facilitate trade and internationalisation.”
- democracy support through initiatives»Prioritera insatser som stödjer arbetet för demokrati och mänskliga rättigheter« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Prioritise initiatives that support work for democracy and human rights”
- Swedish interests guide foreign policyweak support»Svensk utrikespolitik ska värna svenska intressen.« (party programme ↗)“Swedish foreign policy shall protect Swedish interests.”
flags: citat_svagt
The plan wants Sweden to trade and maintain good relations with other states and for Sweden's position in trade to be improved, which speaks for approving rather than rejecting a partnership agreement.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants Sweden to trade and maintain good relations with other states and for Sweden's position in trade to be improved, which speaks for approving rather than rejecting a partnership agreement. The plan is fundamentally positive toward free trade and interstate cooperation. Rejecting the agreement as leverage for democracy lacks support in the plan, even though it wants to make a distinction in support for undemocratic regimes.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill att Sverige handlar och upprätthåller goda relationer med andra stater och att Sveriges ställning i handeln förbättras, vilket talar för att ett partnerskapsavtal godkänns snarare än avslås. Planen är i grunden positiv till frihandel och mellanstatligt samarbete. Att avslå avtalet som påtryckningsmedel för demokrati saknar stöd i planen, även om den vill göra åtskillnad i stödet till odemokratiska regimer.
- promote tradedecisive»Förbättra Sveriges ställning på den internationella marknaden och i handel« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Improve Sweden's position on the international market and in trade”
- cooperation and good relations»Sverigedemokraterna vill arbeta för att Sverige skall handla, samarbeta och upprätthålla goda relationer med alla demokratiska och fredliga nationer och stater i världen.« (party programme ↗)“The Sweden Democrats want to work for Sweden to trade, cooperate and maintain good relations with all democratic and peaceful nations and states in the world.”
- free trade friendliness»Sverigedemokraterna är i grunden positiva till frihandel« (party programme ↗)“The Sweden Democrats are fundamentally positive toward free trade”
- distinction based on democratic values»Sverige bör göra större åtskillnad i sin hållning till demokratiska värden och upphöra med finansiellt eller politiskt stöd till länder eller rörelser som varken bidrar till svenskarnas intressen eller har en genuin sekulär rättsstatlig strävan eller respekt för mänskliga fri- och rättigheter för alla oberoende av kön, religion eller sexuell läggning.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden should make greater distinctions in its stance toward democratic values and cease financial or political support to countries or movements that neither contribute to Swedes' interests nor have a genuine secular rule-of-law aspiration or respect for human freedom and rights for all regardless of gender, religion or sexual orientation.”
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2025/26:UU23)
- Committee report full text (HD01UU23)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2025/26:4190 — med anledning av prop. 2025/26:248 Avtal om fördjupat partnerskap och samarbete mellan Europeiska unionen och dess medlemsstater, å ena sidan, och Republiken Kirgizistan, å andra sidan av Jacob Risberg m.fl. (MP)
- Proposition 2025/26:248 — Avtal om fördjupat partnerskap och samarbete mellan Europeiska unionen och dess medlemsstater, å ena sidan, och Republiken Kirgizistan, å andra sidan
Source: The Swedish Parliament