2025-02-262024/25:NU13 · p.2NUBusiness & energy

WTO reform

Reform of the WTO, with a focus on tariffs on environmental and climate technology

What's at stake: As an export-dependent country, Sweden relies heavily on global trade rules. How the WTO is reformed affects both the export prospects of Swedish companies and access to cheaper environmental and climate technology through lower tariffs.

Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.

What the vote decides

The question is whether the Riksdag should call on the government to work for a reform of the WTO that gives top priority to a global agreement lowering and removing tariffs on environmental and climate technology, or whether no such statement should be made.

Yes Yes — the committee proposal

The committee rejects the motions calling for a reform of the WTO.

No No — the reservations

Reservation 6 (C)

The reservation (C) argues that Sweden is an export-dependent country whose prosperity rests on free trade in an open market, making the WTO's rules very important. According to the reservation, the WTO meeting in Abu Dhabi in 2024 showed how large countries instead want to strengthen their own domestic markets for short-term gains, which is why the WTO needs to be reformed so that new global trade agreements can again be concluded. The reservation holds that a global agreement lowering and removing tariffs on environmental and climate technology should be the top priority for a reformed WTO.

Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.

VSMPCLKDMSD
YesNoAbstainAbsent

What do the votes mean here?

Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).

No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 6 by C.

Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.

What each plan points to — and how the party voted

For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.

PlanVoteConfidenceEvidence
VYesAbstain 0/0/19/5departs from the planconfidence: lownot addressed
SNoAbstain 1/0/92/13departs from the planconfidence: highexplicit
MPNoAbstain 0/0/15/3departs from the planconfidence: mediumexplicit
Cown reservationNoNo 0/21/0/3follows the planconfidence: highnot addressed
LNoYes 12/0/0/4departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
KDNoYes 16/0/0/3departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
MNoYes 60/0/0/8departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
SDNoAbstain 0/0/63/9departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed

Broke with the party line

SKenneth G Forslund (S, Västra Götalands läns västra)Yes — party line: Abstain

MPs whose vote differs from their party's majority position in this division. Marked with a dark ring in the chamber view.

Committee proposal

The Riksdag rejects the motions 2024/25:1466 by Tobias Andersson et al. (SD) claims 17 and 18, 2024/25:2467 by Elisabeth Thand Ringqvist et al. (C) claim 24, 2024/25:3107 by Morgan Johansson et al. (S) claim 45 and 2024/25:3136 by Fredrik Olovsson et al. (S) claim 32.

Original (Swedish)

Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2024/25:1466 av Tobias Andersson m.fl. (SD) yrkandena 17 och 18, 2024/25:2467 av Elisabeth Thand Ringqvist m.fl. (C) yrkande 24, 2024/25:3107 av Morgan Johansson m.fl. (S) yrkande 45 och 2024/25:3136 av Fredrik Olovsson m.fl. (S) yrkande 32.

Riksdag decision: The Riksdag rejected approximately 80 proposals on trade policy in motions from the regular motion period 2024. The proposals concern, among other things, the reform of the World Trade Organization, WTO, trade relations with certain countries and regions, and the free movement of certain goods and services. The Riksdag refers, among other things, to the policy pursued and that work is already underway in many of the issues covered by the proposals.

Counter-proposals

Plan vs actual vote

Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.

VVänsterpartietYesAbstaindeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan works against trade agreements that restrict the space for democratic decisions and favours intergovernmental minimum rules over supranational decisions, as well as fairness rather than free trade terms.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan works against trade agreements that restrict the space for democratic decisions and favours intergovernmental minimum rules over supranational decisions, as well as fairness rather than free trade terms. A WTO reform whose purpose is to make it easier to conclude new free trade agreements goes in the opposite direction, even though the plan shares the interest in technology transfer in the climate field — where it however advocates climate tariffs, not abolished tariffs. The conclusion is derived with low certainty.

Original (Swedish)

Planen arbetar mot handelsavtal som inskränker utrymmet för demokratiska beslut och förordar mellanstatliga minimiregler framför överstatliga beslut, samt rättvisa snarare än fria handelsvillkor. En WTO-reform vars syfte är att göra det lättare att sluta nya frihandelsavtal går i motsatt riktning, även om planen delar intresset av tekniköverföring på klimatområdet — där den dock förespråkar klimattullar, inte avskaffade tullar. Slutsatsen är härledd med låg säkerhet.

  • trade agreements must not bind democracydecisive»mot handelsavtal som inskränker utrymmet för« (party programme ↗)“against trade agreements that restrict the space for”
  • intergovernmental minimum rules»en bättre väg att gå än överstatliga beslut.« (party programme ↗)“a better way to go than supranational decisions.”
  • fairness rather than free trade»solidariskt bistånd och rättvisa handelsvillkor.« (party programme ↗)“solidarity-based aid and fair trade terms.”
  • climate tariffs as a tool»tullar är viktiga verktyg för det.« (party programme ↗)“tariffs are an important tool for that.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

SSocialdemokraternaNoAbstaindeparts from the planexplicit

The plan establishes that global cooperation within the WTO shall be strengthened and that Sweden shall export climate-smart solutions and drive other countries in climate transition.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan establishes that global cooperation within the WTO shall be strengthened and that Sweden shall export climate-smart solutions and drive other countries in climate transition. Reforming global trade rules and prioritising an agreement on reduced tariffs on environmental and climate technology combine these two commitments. The plan also stands up for open, free and fair trade.

Original (Swedish)

Planen slår fast att det globala samarbetet inom WTO ska stärkas och att Sverige ska exportera klimatsmarta lösningar och driva på andra länder i klimatomställningen. Att reformera de globala handelsreglerna och prioritera ett avtal om sänkta tullar på miljö- och klimatteknik förenar dessa två åtaganden. Planen står dessutom upp för en öppen, fri och rättvis handel.

  • strengthened WTO cooperationdecisive»Det globala samarbetet inom WTO ska stärkas, liksom samarbetet med likasinnade länder.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Global cooperation within the WTO shall be strengthened, as shall cooperation with like-minded countries.”
  • drive global climate transition»Exportera klimatsmarta lösningar och driv på andra länder.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Export climate-smart solutions and drive other countries forward.”
  • open and fair trade»Vi står upp för en öppen, fri och rättvis handel.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We stand up for open, free and fair trade.”
  • trade consistent with environmental agreements»De internationella handelsavtalen måste stämma överens med de internationella« (party programme ↗)“International trade agreements must be consistent with the international”

The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.

MPMiljöpartietNoAbstaindeparts from the planexplicit

The party programme explicitly requires that the World Trade Organisation WTO be reformed and democratised and that Sweden pursues fair trade.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The party programme explicitly requires that the World Trade Organisation WTO be reformed and democratised and that Sweden pursues fair trade. The plan also wants Swedish industry to deliver green goods and services globally, which argues for reduced tariffs on environmental and climate technology. That the plan simultaneously wants to introduce climate tariffs against countries outside the EU is a caveat, but the reform requirement is substantively supported.

Original (Swedish)

Partiprogrammet kräver uttryckligen att Världshandelsorganisationen WTO reformeras och demokratiseras och att Sverige verkar för frihandel på rättvisa villkor. Planen vill också att svensk industri levererar gröna varor och tjänster globalt, vilket talar för sänkta tullar på miljö- och klimatteknik. Att planen samtidigt vill införa klimattullar mot länder utanför EU är ett förbehåll, men reformkravet i sak stöds.

  • reform WTOdecisive»Världshandelsorganisationen WTO, Internationella valutafonden IMF och« (party programme ↗)“The World Trade Organisation WTO, the International Monetary Fund IMF and”
  • free trade on fair terms»omvärlden och verka för frihandel på rättvisa« (party programme ↗)“the world and pursue free trade on fair”
  • dissemination of green technology»svensk industri att leverera gröna varor och tjänster« (party programme ↗)“Swedish industry to deliver green goods and services”
  • climate tariffs as a caveat»höja priset på utsläppsrätter i EU, inkludera utsläpp från flyg och sjöfart i systemet och införa klimattullar på varor från länder utanför EU.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“raise the price on emission rights in the EU, include emissions from aviation and shipping in the system and introduce climate tariffs on goods from countries outside the EU.”

The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.

CCenterpartietNoNofollows the plannot addressed

The election manifesto makes trade policy a climate tool that should cut fossil subsidies and press major emitters, and states that Sweden cannot manage without free trade and more open markets.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The election manifesto makes trade policy a climate tool that should cut fossil subsidies and press major emitters, and states that Sweden cannot manage without free trade and more open markets. The party programme condemns tariffs and trade barriers and argues that shared challenges like tariff walls and climate issues can only be solved through international cooperation. Reformed global trade rules with abolished tariffs on climate technology as highest priority follows directly from this, even though the WTO is not mentioned.

Original (Swedish)

Valmanifestet gör handelspolitiken till ett klimatverktyg som ska kapa fossila subventioner och pressa stora utsläppare, och slår fast att Sverige inte klarar sig utan frihandel och öppnare marknader. Partiprogrammet fördömer tullar och handelshinder och menar att gemensamma utmaningar som tullmurar och klimatfrågan bara kan lösas genom internationellt samarbete. Reformerade globala handelsregler med avskaffade tullar på klimatteknik som högsta prioritet följer direkt av detta, även om WTO inte nämns.

  • trade policy for climatedecisive»Vi ska använda handelspolitiken för att kapa fossila subventioner runtom i världen och pressa stora utsläppare som Kina att stänga ner sina kolkraftverk.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We shall use trade policy to cut fossil subsidies around the world and pressure major emitters like China to shut down their coal power plants.”
  • free trade and open markets»Sverige klarar sig inte utan frihandel. Öppna upp fler marknader för svenska varor och tjänster.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden cannot manage without free trade. Open more markets for Swedish goods and services.”
  • away with tariffs»Tullar och handelshinder begränsar konsumenters och producenters val.« (party programme ↗)“Tariffs and trade barriers limit consumers' and producers' choice.”
  • international cooperation required»Utmaningar som är gemensamma för många nationer, som tullmurar, klimatfrågan och internationell brottslighet, kan bara lösas genom internationellt samarbete.« (party programme ↗)“Challenges that are shared by many nations, such as tariff walls, the climate issue and international crime, can only be solved through international cooperation.”
LLiberalernaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The party programme requires that Sweden is a strong voice for free trade in the first place through global agreements and that tariffs and other trade barriers against the rest of the world are completely abolished – which is precisely the direction in the counter-proposal's demand for reformed global trade rules.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The party programme requires that Sweden is a strong voice for free trade in the first place through global agreements and that tariffs and other trade barriers against the rest of the world are completely abolished – which is precisely the direction in the counter-proposal's demand for reformed global trade rules. That a global agreement on reduced tariffs on environmental and climate technology is prioritized responds to that climate aspects shall be integrated in trade policy and that new technology and international cooperation is the most important climate tool. WTO is not explicitly mentioned, so the conclusion is derived.

Original (Swedish)

Partiprogrammet kräver att Sverige är en stark röst för frihandel i första hand genom globala avtal och att tullar och andra handelshinder mot omvärlden helt avskaffas – vilket är precis inriktningen i motförslagets krav på reformerade globala handelsregler. Att ett globalt avtal om sänkta tullar på miljö- och klimatteknik prioriteras svarar mot att klimataspekterna ska integreras i handelspolitiken och att ny teknik och internationellt samarbete är det viktigaste klimatverktyget. WTO nämns inte uttryckligen, så slutsatsen är härledd.

  • global free trade agreements firstdecisive»Sverige ska vara en stark röst för frihandel, i första hand genom globala avtal men annars genom« (party programme ↗)“Sweden shall be a strong voice for free trade, first and foremost through global agreements but otherwise through”
  • abolished tariffs»EU ska helt avskaffa tullar och andra handelshinder mot omvärlden.« (party programme ↗)“The EU shall completely abolish tariffs and other trade barriers against the rest of the world.”
  • climate in trade policy»Klimataspekterna ska integreras i EU:s handelspolitik.« (party programme ↗)“Climate aspects shall be integrated in the EU's trade policy.”
  • technology and international cooperation»mer ny teknik, mer internationellt samarbete och fler effektiva styrmedel« (2022 manifesto ↗)“more new technology, more international cooperation and more effective instruments”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

KDKristdemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The party programme makes freer world trade with fairer rules a prerequisite for reduced global inequality and requires trade liberalizations for the products poorer countries are best at producing.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The party programme makes freer world trade with fairer rules a prerequisite for reduced global inequality and requires trade liberalizations for the products poorer countries are best at producing. The plan also places requirements on international trade bodies like the WTO and establishes that the EU shall work for a solution to climate problems, which supports the requirement for reduced tariffs on environmental and climate technology. The counter-proposal's requirement for reformed global trade rules is therefore in line with the plan.

Original (Swedish)

Partiprogrammet gör en friare världshandel med rättvisare spelregler till en förutsättning för minskade globala klyftor och kräver handelsliberaliseringar för de produkter fattigare länder är bäst på att producera. Planen ställer också krav på internationella handelsorgan som WTO och slår fast att EU ska verka för en lösning av klimatproblemet, vilket bär kravet på sänkta tullar på miljö- och klimatteknik. Motförslagets krav på reformerade globala handelsregler ligger därför i linje med planen.

  • freer world tradedecisive»En friare världshandel med rättvisare spelregler är en förutsättning för att klyftorna ska kunna minska.« (party programme ↗)“Freer world trade with fairer rules is a prerequisite for inequality to be able to decrease.”
  • requirements on trade bodies»Internationella organ som Världshandelsorganisationen WTO« (party programme ↗)“International bodies such as the World Trade Organization WTO”
  • global climate solution»EU verka för en lösning av klimatproblemet.« (party programme ↗)“EU work for a solution to climate problems.”
  • trade liberalizations»Det behövs handelsliberaliseringar för de produkter« (party programme ↗)“Trade liberalizations are needed for the products”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

MModeraternaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan sees the state's task as facilitating trade and internationalization and wants to reform international institutions, including the UN.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan sees the state's task as facilitating trade and internationalization and wants to reform international institutions, including the UN. It also establishes that emission reductions abroad are often cheaper than at home, which argues for abolishing tariffs on environmental and climate technology. A reform of the WTO to enable new agreements therefore aligns with the plan, which however does not mention the WTO.

Original (Swedish)

Planen ser statens uppgift som att underlätta för handel och internationalisering och vill reformera de internationella institutionerna, bland annat FN. Den slår också fast att utsläppsminskningar utomlands ofta är billigare än här hemma, vilket talar för avskaffade tullar på miljö- och klimatteknik. En reformering av WTO för att möjliggöra nya avtal ligger därför i linje med planen, som dock inte nämner WTO.

  • underlätta handeldecisive»underlätta för handel och internationalisering« (party programme ↗)“facilitate trade and internationalization”
  • reformerade internationella institutioner»Verka för ett reformerat FN« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Work for a reformed UN”
  • internationella klimatinsatser lönar sig»Samtidigt är kostnaden för att minska utsläppen genom internationella klimatinsatser ofta mycket lägre än för att minska utsläppen i Sverige« (2022 manifesto ↗)“At the same time, the cost of reducing emissions through international climate initiatives is often much lower than the cost of reducing emissions in Sweden”
  • regelbaserad handelsordning»det regelbaserade systemet för handel« (party programme ↗)“the rules-based system for trade”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

SDSverigedemokraternaNoAbstaindeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan establishes that the possibility for global trade and Swedish exports are fundamental to Swedish prosperity and that Sweden's position in trade should be improved.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan establishes that the possibility for global trade and Swedish exports are fundamental to Swedish prosperity and that Sweden's position in trade should be improved. It also wants to contribute to reduced emissions through increased export of goods and services, which lowered tariffs on environmental and climate technology favour. Reformed global trade rules are therefore supported, with the requirement that Swedish interests are protected in the agreements.

Original (Swedish)

Planen slår fast att möjligheten till global handel och svensk export är grundläggande för svenskt välstånd och att Sveriges ställning i handeln ska förbättras. Den vill dessutom bidra till minskade utsläpp genom ökad export av varor och tjänster, vilket sänkta tullar på miljö- och klimatteknik gynnar. Reformerade globala handelsregler stöds därför, med kravet att svenska intressen värnas i avtalen.

  • global trade and Swedish exportsdecisive»Men det handlar också om att förbättra möjligheten till global handel och svensk export, som är grundläggande för svenskt välstånd.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“But it is also about improving the possibility for global trade and Swedish exports, which are fundamental to Swedish prosperity.”
  • exports as a climate measure»Bidra till minskade utsläpp genom att öka exporten av mat, varor och tjänster« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Contribute to reduced emissions by increasing exports of food, goods and services”
  • strengthened Swedish trade»Förbättra Sveriges ställning på den internationella marknaden och i handel« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Improve Sweden's position on the international market and in trade”
  • Swedish interests in agreements»Värna svenska intressen i frihandelsavtal« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Protect Swedish interests in free trade agreements”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

Share and embed

Embed as a widget (iframe): previewSizeLanguage

Sources and documents

Documents under consideration

Source: The Swedish Parliament