2025-04-022024/25:FöU4 · p.4FöUDefence
Rescue services
State versus municipal responsibility for the rescue service
What's at stake: The decision affects how equal and coordinated the rescue service becomes across different municipalities, particularly during larger incidents and crises that require resources from multiple sources. It concerns residents who depend on a fast and competent rescue response, as well as the municipalities currently responsible for organising the service.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the state should take back principal responsibility for the rescue service from municipalities in order to ensure a uniform standard nationwide, or whether the municipal rescue service should continue to be developed within its current organisation, supported by state assignments and initiatives.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee rejects the call to examine state responsibility for the rescue service. It considers that the municipal rescue service should continue to operate as uniformly, effectively and safely as possible nationwide, pointing to the government's and MSB's ongoing work on efficiency improvements, reactivated civic service duty, the next generation of the Rakel radio network and guidance on drone use as sufficient measures for now.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 6 (SD)
The reservation (SD) calls for the government to examine whether the state should once again become the principal for the rescue service, as it was before municipalisation in 1986. The reasoning is that the municipal rescue service has faced recurring problems with resource shortages, staff shortages, coordination problems between municipalities and an unclear division of responsibility, and that state responsibility would ensure a uniform standard and ease coordination during major incidents.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 6 by SD.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
What each plan points to — and how the party voted
For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| Plan | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Abstain 0/0/20/4 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| S | No | Abstain 0/0/93/13 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| MP | Yes | Abstain 0/0/15/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| C | Yes | Abstain 0/0/20/4 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| L | No | Yes 13/0/0/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| KD | Yes | Yes 17/0/0/2 | follows the plan | confidence: low | derived |
| M | Yes | Yes 60/0/0/8 | follows the plan | confidence: low | derived |
| SD | No | No 0/62/0/10 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2024/25:656 by Mattias Eriksson Falk and Roger Hedlund (both SD) requests 1 and 2, 2024/25:857 by Hanna Gunnarsson et al. (V) requests 1 and 7, 2024/25:1407 by Björn Söder et al. (SD) request 10, 2024/25:2955 by Muharrem Demirok et al. (C) request 42, 2024/25:3023 by Peter Hultqvist et al. (S) requests 52 and 63, 2024/25:3038 by Daniel Helldén et al. (MP) requests 59-61 and 2024/25:3160 by Mikael Larsson et al. (C) requests 33, 34, 36, 37 and 56.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2024/25:656 av Mattias Eriksson Falk och Roger Hedlund (båda SD) yrkandena 1 och 2, 2024/25:857 av Hanna Gunnarsson m.fl. (V) yrkandena 1 och 7, 2024/25:1407 av Björn Söder m.fl. (SD) yrkande 10, 2024/25:2955 av Muharrem Demirok m.fl. (C) yrkande 42, 2024/25:3023 av Peter Hultqvist m.fl. (S) yrkandena 52 och 63, 2024/25:3038 av Daniel Helldén m.fl. (MP) yrkandena 59-61 och 2024/25:3160 av Mikael Larsson m.fl. (C) yrkandena 33, 34, 36, 37 och 56.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag said no to approximately 100 proposals concerning society's crisis preparedness in motions from the general motion period 2024. The proposals deal with, for example, crisis preparedness, cyber security, radiation safety and protection against accidents. The Riksdag refers in part to the fact that work is already underway in the areas covered by the proposals.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants the government to investigate whether the state should become the principal for rescue services. (SD) — Reservation 6
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan does not address fire and rescue services, but gives the state overall responsibility for welfare and demands that services function throughout the country.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan does not address fire and rescue services, but gives the state overall responsibility for welfare and demands that services function throughout the country. Where municipal administration has created unequal conditions, the plan wants the state to take over primary responsibility, which it does explicitly for schools. Investigating state administration for uniform standards therefore lies in line with the plan, even though municipal self-government is also valued.
Original (Swedish)
Planen behandlar inte räddningstjänsten, men ger staten det övergripande ansvaret för välfärden och kräver att service fungerar överallt i landet. Där kommunal huvudmannaskap gett ojämlika förutsättningar vill planen att staten tar över huvudansvaret, vilket den gör uttryckligen för skolan. Att utreda ett statligt huvudmannaskap för enhetlig standard ligger därför i linje med planen, även om det kommunala självstyret också värnas.
- state's overall responsibilitydecisive»Staten har det övergripande ansvaret för välfärden.« (party programme ↗)“The state has overall responsibility for welfare.”
- equivalent service throughout the country»Skola, vård, omsorg och annan service behöver fungera överallt.« (party programme ↗)“Schools, healthcare, care and other services need to function everywhere.”
- state administration for equality»För att bygga upp en jämlik skola vill vi att staten tar över huvudansvaret från kommunerna« (party programme ↗)“To build an equal school we want the state to take over primary responsibility from the municipalities”
- valued municipal self-government»Det kommunala självstyret är en betydelsefull del av den svenska demokratin.« (party programme ↗)“Municipal self-government is a meaningful part of Swedish democracy.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The documents say nothing about the responsibility for rescue services, but the plan is clear that the state shall be present throughout the country and that all residents shall have equal access to society's services regardless of municipality, which is precisely what the counter-proposal wants to investigate.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The documents say nothing about the responsibility for rescue services, but the plan is clear that the state shall be present throughout the country and that all residents shall have equal access to society's services regardless of municipality, which is precisely what the counter-proposal wants to investigate. The commitment to strengthen civil defence and crisis preparedness points in the same direction. The conclusion is based on general principles and is therefore uncertain.
Original (Swedish)
Dokumenten säger inget om huvudmannaskapet för räddningstjänsten, men planen är tydlig med att staten ska finnas närvarande i hela landet och att alla invånare ska ha likvärdig tillgång till samhällets tjänster oavsett kommun, vilket är precis det motförslaget vill utreda. Åtagandet att rusta upp det civila försvaret och krisberedskapen pekar i samma riktning. Slutsatsen bygger på allmänna principer och är därför osäker.
- state presence throughout the countrydecisive»Staten ska finnas närvarande i hela landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The state shall be present throughout the country.”
- equal services throughout the country»Alla invånare i hela landet ska ha likvärdig tillgång till skola, vård och omsorg.« (party programme ↗)“All residents in the whole country shall have equal access to school, healthcare and care.”
- strengthened crisis preparedness»Arbetet att förstärka det civila försvaret och krisberedskapen måste fortsätta« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The work to strengthen civil defence and crisis preparedness must continue”
- legislated equality»Vi vill ha en ny äldreomsorgslag som säkerställer att alla får en lika bra omsorg i hela landet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want a new elderly care law that ensures everyone gets equally good care throughout the country”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan is explicitly decentralist: decisions should be made close to those affected and society should build on more alternative and local solutions to become robust.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan is explicitly decentralist: decisions should be made close to those affected and society should build on more alternative and local solutions to become robust. Moving responsibility for rescue services from municipalities to the state goes in the opposite direction. The plan's response to the resource shortage is instead increased appropriations for crisis preparedness and civil defence, which makes the position uncertain but derived.
Original (Swedish)
Planen är uttalat decentralistisk: beslut ska fattas nära dem som berörs och samhället bör bygga på fler alternativa och lokala lösningar för att bli robust. Att flytta huvudmannaskapet för räddningstjänsten från kommunerna till staten går i motsatt riktning. Planens svar på resursbristen är i stället ökade anslag till krisberedskap och civilt försvar, vilket gör ställningstagandet osäkert men härlett.
- decentralizationdecisive»Miljöpartiet de gröna förespråkar decentralisering.« (party programme ↗)“The Green Party advocates decentralization.”
- decisions close to citizens»Beslut bör tas så nära medborgarna som möjligt.« (party programme ↗)“Decisions should be made as close to citizens as possible.”
- local solutions provide robustness»vi att fler alternativa och lokala lösningar skapas« (party programme ↗)“we that more alternative and local solutions are created”
- more resources for crisis preparedness»satsa en större andel av försvarets pengar på det civila försvaret, och öka anslagen till krisberedskap.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“allocate a larger share of defence spending to civil defence, and increase appropriations for crisis preparedness.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan is consistently decentralist: decisions must be made close to those affected and responsibility for welfare activities must not be moved from the local and regional level to the state.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan is consistently decentralist: decisions must be made close to those affected and responsibility for welfare activities must not be moved from the local and regional level to the state. The counter-proposal wants to investigate state takeover of the responsibility for rescue services, which is contrary to that principle. Equality throughout the country should, according to the plan, be achieved through close and reliable services, not through centralisation. Therefore, the plan rejects the demand.
Original (Swedish)
Planen är konsekvent decentralistisk: beslut ska fattas nära dem som berörs och ansvaret för välfärdsverksamhet ska inte flyttas från den lokala och regionala nivån till staten. Motförslaget vill undersöka ett statligt återtagande av huvudmannaskapet för räddningstjänsten, vilket är motsatsen till den principen. Likvärdighet i hela landet ska enligt planen nås genom nära och pålitlig service, inte genom centralisering. Därför avvisar planen kravet.
- no nationalisation of welfaredecisive»Ansvaret för vården ska inte flyttas från regionerna till staten.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Responsibility for care must not be moved from regions to the state.”
- decentralisation»Decentralisera mera. Människor ska få bestämma mer själva, och politiska beslut ska fattas nära dem som berörs.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Decentralise more. People must be able to decide more themselves, and political decisions must be made close to those affected.”
- decentralisation at all levels»inom alla områden och på alla nivåer, att verka för decentralisering av beslut« (party programme ↗)“in all areas and at all levels, to work for decentralisation of decisions”
- close and equivalent services»Offentlig service ska vara nära och pålitlig i hela landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Public services must be close and reliable throughout the country.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan advocates consistent state responsibility where equity falls short: the state shall take over schools from municipalities, have consolidated responsibility for personal assistance and take greater responsibility for healthcare preparedness and planning.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan advocates consistent state responsibility where equity falls short: the state shall take over schools from municipalities, have consolidated responsibility for personal assistance and take greater responsibility for healthcare preparedness and planning. Access to state services shall be ensured throughout the country. To investigate state responsibility for rescue services therefore follows the plan's line.
Original (Swedish)
Planen förespråkar genomgående statligt huvudmannaskap där likvärdigheten brister: staten ska ta över skolan från kommunerna, ha det samlade huvudmannaskapet för den personliga assistansen och ta ett större ansvar för sjukvårdens beredskap och planering. Tillgången till statlig service ska säkras i hela landet. Att utreda ett statligt huvudmannaskap för räddningstjänsten följer därför planens linje.
- state responsibility for equalitydecisive»Vi vill att staten tar över ansvaret från skolan från kommunerna så att alla elever får gå i bra skolor – inte bara de som råkar bo på rätt ställe.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want the state to take over responsibility for schools from municipalities so that all pupils get to attend good schools – not just those who happen to live in the right place.”
- consolidated state responsibility»ha det samlade huvudmannaskapet för den personliga assistansen.« (party programme ↗)“have consolidated responsibility for personal assistance.”
- state responsibility for preparedness»Staten ska ta ett större ansvar för sjukvårdens strategiska planering, placering av högspecialiserad vård, beredskap och långsiktig kompetensförsörjning.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The state shall take greater responsibility for strategic planning of healthcare, placement of specialized care, preparedness and long-term competency supply.”
- state services nationwide»Tillgången till statlig service ska säkras i hela landet.« (party programme ↗)“Access to state services shall be ensured throughout the country.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan wants a strong municipal self-governance and places the burden of proof on whoever wants to deprive a lower level of its task; investigating a state takeover of the rescue service goes against this starting point.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants a strong municipal self-governance and places the burden of proof on whoever wants to deprive a lower level of its task; investigating a state takeover of the rescue service goes against this starting point. What a community can manage effectively it should also be allowed to manage. That the election manifesto wants to nationalise healthcare at the same time shows that the plan allows exceptions when inequality is proven, so confidence is low.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill ha en stark kommunal självstyrelse och lägger bevisbördan på den som vill beröva en lägre nivå dess uppgift; att undersöka ett statligt övertagande av räddningstjänsten går emot den utgångspunkten. Det en gemenskap kan sköta ändamålsenligt ska den också få sköta. Att valmanifestet vill förstatliga sjukvården visar samtidigt att planen tillåter undantag när ojämlikheten är bevisad, varför säkerheten är låg.
- strong municipal self-governancedecisive»Den kommunala självstyrelsen ska vara stark« (party programme ↗)“Strong municipal self-governance shall be maintained”
- burden of proof in centralisation»Denna princip innebär att bevisbördan vilar på dem« (party programme ↗)“This principle means that the burden of proof rests on those”
- subsidiarity»sköta ska den också få sköta.« (party programme ↗)“should manage shall it also be allowed to manage.”
- the state takes over when inequality is shown»Avskaffa regionernas ansvar för sjukvården.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Abolish the regions' responsibility for healthcare.”
The plan says nothing about the ownership of the rescue service.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan says nothing about the ownership of the rescue service. The closest principles speak against a state takeover: decisions should be made as close to citizens as possible, decentralized decision-making makes society more robust and a large state creates a weaker society. The plan wants instead to strengthen civil defence planning and staffing within the current structure. Therefore the plan rejects the requirement.
Original (Swedish)
Planen säger inget om huvudmannaskapet för räddningstjänsten. Närmast liggande principer talar mot ett statligt övertagande: beslut ska fattas så nära medborgarna som möjligt, decentraliserat beslutsfattande gör samhället mer robust och en stor stat ger ett svagare samhälle. Planen vill däremot stärka det civila försvarets planering och personalförsörjning inom nuvarande ordning. Därför avvisar planen kravet.
- decisions at the lowest leveldecisive»Beslut ska fattas på lägsta möjliga nivå, så nära medborgarna som möjligt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Decisions shall be made at the lowest possible level, as close to citizens as possible.”
- decentralization creates robustness»Decentraliserat beslutsfattande gör samhället mer robust« (party programme ↗)“Decentralized decision-making makes society more robust”
- limited state apparatus»En stor stat leder till ett svagare samhälle.« (party programme ↗)“A large state leads to a weaker society.”
- strengthened civil preparedness»Förstärka det civila försvarets personalförsörjning« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strengthen civil defence staffing”
The party programme states that essential parts of our infrastructure should be under state control and counts national security among the state's core responsibilities, and the plan advocates the same solution in other areas by having the state resume principal responsibility where municipal differences create unequal service.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme states that essential parts of our infrastructure should be under state control and counts national security among the state's core responsibilities, and the plan advocates the same solution in other areas by having the state resume principal responsibility where municipal differences create unequal service. The fire and rescue service is such a protective function where the plan wants equivalent standards nationwide. Examining state principal responsibility is therefore supported by the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet slår fast att väsentliga delar av vår infrastruktur bör stå under statlig kontroll och räknar nationens säkerhet till statens kärnuppgifter, och planen förespråkar samma lösning på andra områden genom att staten återtar huvudmannaskapet där kommunala skillnader skapar ojämlik service. Räddningstjänsten är en sådan skyddsfunktion där planen vill ha likvärdig standard i hela landet. Att utreda ett statligt huvudmannaskap stöds därför av planen.
- state control over core functionsdecisive»väsentliga delar av vår infrastruktur bör stå under statlig kontroll« (party programme ↗)“essential parts of our infrastructure should be under state control”
- state principal responsibility»Samtidigt som Sverigedemokraterna förespråkar att staten återtar huvudmannaskapet« (party programme ↗)“At the same time, the Sweden Democrats advocate that the state resumes principal responsibility”
- review of state principal responsibility»Sverigedemokraterna vill också se över hur staten i större utsträckning kan ta över huvudansvaret för sjukvården, med utgångspunkt i framgångsrika exempel i Norge och Danmark.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Sweden Democrats also want to review how the state to a greater extent can assume principal responsibility for healthcare, based on successful examples in Norway and Denmark.”
- the state's safety responsibility»garantera medborgarnas trygghet och säkerhet.« (party programme ↗)“guarantee citizens' safety and security.”
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2024/25:FöU4)
- Committee report full text (HC01FöU4)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2024/25:1009 — Översyn av lagstiftningen kring spridningstillstånd av Rickard Nordin (C)
- Motion 2024/25:1012 — Sveriges behov av att rusta för klimatförändringar av Kerstin Lundgren (C)
- Motion 2024/25:1177 — Ansvaret för samordningen av särskilda händelser av Torsten Elofsson (KD)
- Motion 2024/25:1178 — Skärpta regler för köp av pyrotekniska varor av Torsten Elofsson (KD)
- Motion 2024/25:119 — Ett starkare Norden av Kjell-Arne Ottosson (KD)
- Motion 2024/25:1191 — Sveriges 13 sämsta lagar av Rickard Nordin och Niels Paarup-Petersen (båda C)
- Motion 2024/25:1281 — Använt kärnbränsle som energikälla av Lars Engsund (M)
- Motion 2024/25:1318 — Ett va-system för nutid och framtid av Katarina Luhr m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2024/25:1363 — En tillgänglig sjukvård i världsklass av Carina Ståhl Herrstedt m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1365 — God vård och omsorg för äldre av Carina Ståhl Herrstedt m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1382 — Vattenförsörjning och vattenhantering av Mikael Eskilandersson m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1393 — Post och it i hela landet av Thomas Morell m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1395 — Jordbruk - ökad konkurrenskraft utan förlust av biologisk mångfald av Martin Kinnunen m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1407 — Civilt försvar av Björn Söder m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1467 — En framtidsinriktad it-politik av Tobias Andersson m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1767 — Kostnadsansvar för naturkatastrofer av Paula Örn m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2024/25:1768 — Ansvar för utfärdande och kontroll av sprängkort av Paula Örn m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2024/25:1922 — En funktionsrättspolitik för trygghet och delaktighet av Nadja Awad m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2024/25:194 — Förbud av försäljning av fyrverkerier till allmänheten av Hanna Gunnarsson m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2024/25:1976 — Fotografering av skyddsobjekt av Ann-Sofie Alm (M)
Source: The Swedish Parliament