2026-06-152025/26:SfU32 · p.2SfUMigration & social insurance

New reporting obligations

New data-disclosure duties for authorities in return-enforcement cases

What's at stake: The decision affects how easily the Public Employment Service, the Social Insurance Agency, the Prison and Probation Service, the Enforcement Authority, the Pensions Agency and the Tax Agency can pass on information about individuals to the Police Authority, which in turn can affect people's willingness to have any contact with these authorities at all.

Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.

What the vote decides

The question is what evidentiary threshold should apply for when six authorities must, on their own initiative, pass on information to the Police Authority indicating that a foreign national may lack the right to remain in Sweden - the government's lower bar of ‘reason to assume’ versus a stricter requirement of ‘strong grounds to assume’ - and whether so-called side information should also be covered by the duty.

Yes Yes — the committee proposal

The committee upholds the government's proposal that the disclosure duty should apply already when there is reason to assume that a foreign national lacks the right to remain in Sweden, since the purpose is not for the six authorities to make a full determination of residence rights but to pass on information to the enforcing authorities when concrete circumstances point with some force to the person lacking such a right. Concerns about reduced trust in the authorities are not seen as needing to be exaggerated, since better cooperation and more effective return enforcement could instead increase trust in the state.

No No — the reservations

Reservation 1 (S, C)

The reservation (S, C) wants to replace 'reason to assume' with 'strong grounds to assume' as the condition for the disclosure duty, since the lower threshold sets a low evidentiary bar that risks enabling arbitrary decisions about whose data is passed on. The reservers also want so-called side information - for example observations made during an inspection but not directly relevant to its purpose - to be excluded from the disclosure duty.

Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.

VSMPCLKDMSD
YesNoAbstainAbsent

What do the votes mean here?

Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).

No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 1 by S, C.

Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.

What each plan points to — and how the party voted

For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.

PlanVoteConfidenceEvidence
VNoNo 0/21/0/0follows the planconfidence: mediumderived
Sown reservationYesNo 0/105/0/1departs from the planconfidence: mediumderived
MPNoNo 0/17/1/0follows the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
Cown reservationNoNo 0/24/0/0follows the planconfidence: mediumderived
LNoYes 16/0/0/0departs from the planconfidence: mediumderived
KDYesYes 19/0/0/0follows the planconfidence: lowderived
MYesYes 66/0/0/0follows the planconfidence: mediumderived
SDYesYes 70/0/0/0follows the planconfidence: mediumderived

Broke with the party line

MPEmma Berginger (MP, Skåne läns södra)Abstain — party line: No

MPs whose vote differs from their party's majority position in this division. Marked with a dark ring in the chamber view.

Committee proposal

The Riksdag adopts Chapter 17, Section 6 of the Government's proposal for an amendment to the Aliens Act (2005:716). By this the Riksdag approves proposition 2025/26:263 point 3 in this part and rejects the motions 2025/26:4150 by Tony Haddou et al. (V) request 1 in this part, 2025/26:4152 by Ida Karkiainen et al. (S) request 1, 2025/26:4159 by Niels Paarup-Petersen et al. (C) request 1 and 2025/26:4173 by Annika Hirvonen et al. (MP) requests 1 in this part, 2, 5 and 6 in this part.

Original (Swedish)

Riksdagen antar 17 kap. 6 § regeringens förslag till lag om ändring i utlänningslagen (2005:716). Därmed bifaller riksdagen proposition 2025/26:263 punkt 3 i denna del och avslår motionerna 2025/26:4150 av Tony Haddou m.fl. (V) yrkande 1 i denna del, 2025/26:4152 av Ida Karkiainen m.fl. (S) yrkande 1, 2025/26:4159 av Niels Paarup-Petersen m.fl. (C) yrkande 1 och 2025/26:4173 av Annika Hirvonen m.fl. (MP) yrkandena 1 i denna del, 2, 5 och 6 i denna del.

Riksdag decision: The Government wants to streamline return operations and implement several changes in the Aliens Act, among other things. The Riksdag voted yes to the Government's proposal. In order to streamline return operations, the Government proposes that the Police Authority and the Migration Agency obtain better tools to enforce deportation and expulsion decisions. The Government proposes a new obligation for the Employment Agency, the Social Insurance Agency, the Correctional Service, the Enforcement Authority, the Pensions Agency and the Tax Agency to on their own initiative provide information about a foreigner to the Police Authority if there is reason to believe that he or she does not have the right to remain in Sweden. The proposal entails, among other things, also that the authorities are given additional tools to clarify a foreigner's identity. A possibility is introduced to take possession of and search a foreigner's mobile phone if it can be assumed to contain information about the foreigner's identity. Furthermore, fingerprints and photographs shall be permitted to be used in alien matters to a greater extent and more efficiently than today. The legislative changes enter into force on 13 July 2026.

Counter-proposals

Plan vs actual vote

Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.

VVänsterpartietNoNofollows the planderived

The plan states that all people have the right to protection of their personal integrity and that authorities have a special responsibility to treat all people with the same respect.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan states that all people have the right to protection of their personal integrity and that authorities have a special responsibility to treat all people with the same respect. A standard of proof based merely on suspicion opens the door to arbitrariness and for information to be provided based on how someone looks, which the plan explicitly warns against when it describes racism in authority operations. A higher standard of proof and exceptions for incidental information thus follow from the plan's commitments.

Original (Swedish)

Planen slår fast att alla människor har rätt till skydd av sin personliga integritet och att myndigheter har ett särskilt ansvar att möta alla människor med samma respekt. Ett beviskrav på blotta anledningen att anta öppnar för godtycke och för att uppgifter lämnas utifrån hur någon ser ut, vilket planen uttryckligen varnar för när den beskriver rasism i myndighetsutövningen. Ett höjt beviskrav och undantag för sidoinformation följer därför av planens åtaganden.

  • protection of personal integritydecisive»har rätt till skydd av sin personliga integritet.« (party programme ↗)“have the right to protection of their personal integrity.”
  • equal treatment»Myndigheter har ett särskilt ansvar att möta alla människor« (party programme ↗)“Authorities have a special responsibility to treat all people”
  • against racism in authority operations»Många unga, särskilt med utländsk bakgrund, som bor i fattiga områden, utsätts även för rasism och övervåld från polisen« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Many young people, especially those with foreign backgrounds, who live in poor areas, are also subjected to racism and police brutality”
  • legal security in authority decisions»Rättssäkerheten behöver upprätthållas genom rättshjälp, medborgerlig« (party programme ↗)“Legal security needs to be maintained through legal aid, civil”
SSocialdemokraternaYesNodeparts from the planderived

The plan explicitly states that secrecy barriers between government agencies shall be removed so that the police and other professions can do their job.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan explicitly states that secrecy barriers between government agencies shall be removed so that the police and other professions can do their job. Raising the burden of proof and exempting side information would instead build new thresholds for information sharing. The plan moreover maintains a tight migration policy, even while it protects personal integrity.

Original (Swedish)

Planen slår uttryckligen fast att sekretesshinder mellan myndigheter ska rivas så att polisen och andra yrkesgrupper kan göra sitt jobb. Att höja beviskravet och undanta sidoinformation bygger tvärtom upp nya trösklar för informationsutbytet. Planen håller dessutom fast vid en stram migrationspolitik, även om den också värnar den personliga integriteten.

  • removed secrecy barriersdecisive»Sekretesshinder mellan myndigheter ska rivas så att polisen och andra yrkesgrupper kan göra sitt jobb.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Secrecy barriers between government agencies shall be removed so that the police and other professions can do their job.”
  • tight migration policy»Vi har stramat åt migrationspolitiken, och denna linje ligger fast.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We have tightened migration policy, and this line is firmly in place.”
  • personal integrity»Skydd för den personliga integriteten.« (party programme ↗)“Protection of personal integrity.”
  • countered discrimination»Bekämpande av rasism och diskriminering.« (party programme ↗)“Combating racism and discrimination.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

MPMiljöpartietNoNofollows the plannot addressed

The counter-proposal wants to raise the evidentiary standard for the reporting obligation and exempt secondary information, to avoid arbitrary assessments of which people information concerns.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The counter-proposal wants to raise the evidentiary standard for the reporting obligation and exempt secondary information, to avoid arbitrary assessments of which people information concerns. The plan requires that the state respects people's personal privacy, that new legislation be examined carefully against fundamental rights and that work against all forms of racism be strengthened. Rights also extend to undocumented migrants.

Original (Swedish)

Motförslaget vill höja beviskravet för uppgiftsskyldigheten och undanta sidoinformation, för att undvika godtyckliga bedömningar av vilka personer uppgifter lämnas om. Planen kräver att staten respekterar människors personliga integritet, att ny lagstiftning prövas mot grundläggande rättigheter och att arbetet mot all typ av rasism stärks. Rättigheterna omfattar dessutom även papperslösa.

  • respect for personal privacydecisive»Staten har ansvar både för att skydda människor från brott och för att respektera« (party programme ↗)“The state has responsibility both for protecting people from crime and for respecting”
  • counter structural racism»Arbetet mot all typ av rasism måste stärkas. Antisemitism, islamofobi och afrofobi är« (party programme ↗)“Work against all forms of racism must be strengthened. Antisemitism, Islamophobia and Afrophobia are”
  • legally certain legislation»prövas noggrant utifrån rättssäkerhet och grundläggande fri- och rättigheter.« (party programme ↗)“carefully examined based on legal certainty and fundamental freedoms and rights.”
  • rights even for undocumented migrants»omfattar alla, även människor på flykt och papperslösa.« (party programme ↗)“includes everyone, including refugees and undocumented migrants.”
CCenterpartietNoNofollows the planderived

The party programme makes strong privacy protection an indispensable part of a democratic society and requires proportionality between legislation's intrusion and its purpose.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The party programme makes strong privacy protection an indispensable part of a democratic society and requires proportionality between legislation's intrusion and its purpose. A higher burden of proof than reasonable cause to suspect, and an exception for incidental information, is just such a proportionality weighing against arbitrariness. The election manifesto also explicitly says no to reverse burden of proof and similar general coercive measures.

Original (Swedish)

Partiprogrammet gör ett starkt integritetsskydd till en omistlig del av ett demokratiskt samhälle och kräver proportionalitet mellan lagstiftningens intrång och dess syfte. Ett högre beviskrav än anledning att anta, och ett undantag för sidoinformation, är just en sådan proportionalitetsavvägning mot godtycke. Valmanifestet säger dessutom uttryckligen nej till omvänd bevisbörda och liknande generella tvångsmedel.

  • proportionality and privacyweak support»All lagstiftning bör prövas mot dess påverkan på människors personliga integritet. Det måste finnas en proportionalitet mellan lagstiftningens inskränkning av medborgarnas integritet och lagarnas syfte.« (party programme ↗)“All legislation should be tested against its impact on people's personal privacy. There must be proportionality between legislation's restriction of citizens' privacy and the purpose of the laws.”
  • strong privacy protectiondecisive»Ett starkt integritetsskydd är därför en omistlig del av ett öppet och demokratiskt samhälle.« (party programme ↗)“Strong privacy protection is therefore an indispensable part of an open and democratic society.”
  • no to arbitrary coercive measures»Rättsstaten och individens rättigheter gentemot staten måste försvaras. Vi säger därför nej till visitationszoner, kollektiv bestraffning, omvänd bevisbörda, anonyma vittnen, preventiv avlyssning och inskränkningar av religionsfriheten.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The rule of law and the individual's rights against the state must be defended. We therefore say no to stop-and-search zones, collective punishment, reverse burden of proof, anonymous witnesses, preventive wiretapping, and restrictions on freedom of religion.”
  • personal privacy»Respekten för den enskildes personliga integritet är en grundsten i varje demokrati.« (party programme ↗)“Respect for the individual's personal privacy is a cornerstone of every democracy.”

flags: citat_svagt

LLiberalernaNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The plan permits privacy intrusions only when an opposing interest weighs obviously heavier and the measure is effective, and requires that information is not used for other purposes than the original ones.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan permits privacy intrusions only when an opposing interest weighs obviously heavier and the measure is effective, and requires that information is not used for other purposes than the original ones. A raised burden of proof and an exception for ancillary information is precisely the limitation these principles require. The plan also establishes that one who lacks permission is not thereby rightless.

Original (Swedish)

Planen tillåter integritetsingrepp bara när ett motstående intresse väger uppenbart tyngre och åtgärden är effektiv, och kräver att uppgifter inte används för andra syften än de ursprungliga. Ett höjt beviskrav och ett undantag för sidoinformation är precis den avgränsning dessa principer kräver. Planen slår också fast att den som saknar tillstånd inte därmed är rättslös.

  • proportionality in privacy intrusionsdecisive»Åtgärder som påverkar den personliga integriteten negativt är endast berättigade om ett motstående intresse väger uppenbart tyngre och åtgärden är effektiv.« (party programme ↗)“Measures that negatively affect personal privacy are only justified if an opposing interest weighs obviously heavier and the measure is effective.”
  • purpose limitation»Övervakning och registrering ska inte användas för andra syften än vad som var de ursprungliga motiven eller vad som var känt för den individ som lämnade uppgifterna.« (party programme ↗)“Surveillance and registration shall not be used for other purposes than what were the original motives or what was known to the individual who provided the information.”
  • privacy analysis of bills»Alla nya lagförslag ska analyseras ur integritetssynpunkt.« (party programme ↗)“All new legislative proposals shall be analyzed from a privacy perspective.”
  • rights regardless of status»Att vara papperslös är inte att vara rättslös.« (party programme ↗)“To be undocumented is not to be rightless.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

KDKristdemokraternaYesYesfollows the planderived

The counter-proposal wants to raise the threshold for the reporting obligation and exempt side information.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The counter-proposal wants to raise the threshold for the reporting obligation and exempt side information. The election manifesto instead requires a complete review of confidentiality rules so that state agencies can share information with each other, and a strict migration policy where irregular migration is countered. The protection of personal integrity pulls in the other direction, but the explicit commitments about information sharing against crime carry more weight here.

Original (Swedish)

Motförslaget vill höja tröskeln för uppgiftsskyldigheten och undanta sidoinformation. Valmanifestet kräver tvärtom en total översyn av sekretessreglerna så att myndigheter kan dela uppgifter med varandra, och en stram migrationspolitik där irreguljär migration motverkas. Skyddet för den personliga integriteten drar åt andra hållet, men de uttryckliga åtagandena om informationsdelning väger tyngre här.

  • state agencies shall share informationdecisive»Total översyn av sekretessreglerna, så att myndigheter kan dela uppgifter mellan sig för att förebygga och klara upp brott.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Complete review of confidentiality rules, so that state agencies can share information between them to prevent and clear up crime.”
  • all crime must be combated»Stram migrationspolitik krävs för att ta itu med integrationsproblem och utanförskap.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“All crime must be effectively and without exception be combated, also such that can be dismissed as minor offences and misdemeanours.”
  • counter irregular migration»säkra land. Vi vill motverka irreguljär migration, motverka människosmuggling och ha ett« (party programme ↗)“secure land. We want to counter irregular migration, counter people smuggling and have a”
  • protection of personal integrity»Den personliga integriteten ska ha ett starkt grundlagsskydd och det« (party programme ↗)“Personal integrity shall have strong constitutional protection and the public must apply great caution and respect for personal integrity in handling personal data.”
MModeraternaYesYesfollows the planderived

The plan wants to remove obstacles for authorities to share information and establishes that those denied asylum must quickly leave the country, otherwise a shadow society grows.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan wants to remove obstacles for authorities to share information and establishes that those denied asylum must quickly leave the country, otherwise a shadow society grows. An elevated standard of proof and exceptions for ancillary information would choke off precisely the information flow that makes return migration effective. The plan's integrity principle speaks in part against this, but the demand is rejected.

Original (Swedish)

Planen vill undanröja hinder för att myndigheter delar information och slår fast att den som fått avslag snabbt ska lämna landet, annars växer ett skuggsamhälle. Ett höjt beviskrav och undantag för sidoinformation skulle strypa just det uppgiftsflöde som gör återvändandet effektivt. Planens integritetsprincip talar delvis emot, men kravet avvisas.

  • effective return migrationdecisive»Av största vikt är att den som fått ett nej på asylansökan så fort som möjligt lämnar landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Of utmost importance is that those denied asylum leave the country as soon as possible.”
  • removed confidentiality barriers»Undanröja alla sekretesshinder mellan socialtjänst och polis« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Remove all confidentiality barriers between social services and police”
  • counter shadow society»Vi riskerar annars ett växande skuggsamhälle, med social utsatthet, illegalt arbete och brottslighet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We risk otherwise a growing shadow society, with social hardship, illegal work and crime”
  • protected personal integrity»Den personliga integriteten ska värnas, såväl från intrång« (party programme ↗)“Personal integrity shall be protected, both from intrusion”
SDSverigedemokraternaYesYesfollows the planderived

The plan demands that the shadow society is combated with more checks and more deportations and that the authorities' tools to detect persons not entitled to be here are improved.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan demands that the shadow society is combated with more checks and more deportations and that the authorities' tools to detect persons not entitled to be here are improved. A raised burden of proof and an exemption for incidental information would reduce the number of reports reaching the enforcement authorities. The counter-proposal's demands thus go against the plan's commitment to lowered thresholds for enforcement.

Original (Swedish)

Planen kräver att skuggsamhället bekämpas med fler kontroller och fler utvisningar och att myndigheternas verktyg för att upptäcka personer utan rätt att vistas här förbättras. Ett höjt beviskrav och ett undantag för sidoinformation skulle minska antalet uppgifter som når de verkställande myndigheterna. Motförslagets krav går därmed emot planens åtagande om sänkta trösklar för verkställighet.

  • more checksdecisive»Bekämpa skuggsamhället och illegal migration med fler kontroller och fler utvisningar« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Combat the shadow society and illegal migration with more checks and more deportations”
  • improved inter-agency cooperation»Rättsväsendets samverkan mellan myndigheter och verktyg för att upptäcka och lagföra kriminella ska förbättras.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The judicial system's cooperation between authorities and tools to detect and prosecute criminals shall be improved.”
  • lowered thresholds»Trösklarna för att ta i förvar och utvisa personer samt verkställa utvisningar behöver också sänkas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The thresholds for taking persons into custody and deporting persons and enforcing deportations also need to be lowered.”
  • shadow society must be stopped»Många har dessutom fått avslag på sin asylansökan men ändå valt att stannat, kunnat ta del av välfärden och bidragit till framväxten av det så kallade skuggsamhället.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Many have also been denied their asylum application but still chose to stay, been able to benefit from welfare and contributed to the emergence of the so-called shadow society.”

Share and embed

Embed as a widget (iframe): previewSizeLanguage

Sources and documents

Documents under consideration

Source: The Swedish Parliament